THE FLAT EARTH PSYOP: EVERYTHING OLD IS NEW AGAIN

The Flat Earth Psyop: 

Everything Old is New Again 

by Josh G
@http://mileswmathis.com/updates.html 

If you're reading this, you have hopefully already realized that the Flat Earth psyop is a discredit by-association (D.B.A) strategy, what Miles likes to call 'black frosting.' What I hope to show in this short paper is that it's not new and that's what it has always been. Of course it is not only a D.B.A strategy, it's also a W.O.T strategy: used to waste our time. So much so that you should probably stop reading this now and move on with your life. I'm not even joking. The only reason I'm writing this is because I sent Miles some info on the original Flat Earth movement, and he thought it was worth bringing it to the attention of his readers. I know he doesn't like wasting mine or other people's time, so I agreed. But I promised myself to keep it short. I think it is sprinkled with enough other useful information to make it worth reading. 

A little background: when I was in 6th grade our teacher asked us to debate Flat Earth. Nobody else in the class wanted to take the Flat Earth side, so I volunteered and ended up winning the debate against the entire class. Of course that doesn't mean I believe in Flat Earth. It just means that the fact that (apparently) so many people have been convinced the Earth is flat shows they don't have better than a 6th grade grasp of science and math. It also means that it is pretty easy to win such a debate with low-level debating tricks. As I learned later in debating class, debating has nothing to do with truth. It has to do with mastering a few tools of discourse. 

Flat Earth may seem beguiling for some, I suppose. For those who have come to realize that they are surrounded by lies, being lied to about the shape of the Earth seems like the logical next step. But keep your guard up and don't fall for it. Flat Earthers will tell me that I should keep an open mind and really give it a chance. But I did. I figured if I could win a debate against my entire 6th grade class, then there must be some compelling arguments. Well, there aren't. I spent two solid days of my life looking into it, searching in vain for something that could not be easily shown to be false, and I'm still angry about losing that much time to such drivel. If you find yourself falling for fallacious FE arguments, you can check out   this youtube channel or read  this exhaustive debunking of Eric Dubay's “proofs” the Earth is flat.* And of course don't forget the most decisive argument against Flat Earth:

Anyway, the reason I even looked into the history of Flat Earth at all is that I was reminded that I was helped in that debate by some junk mail my grandfather shared with me that had been sent to him by the Flat Earth Society. That meant the that Flat Earth psyop had been going around for at least a few decades at that time, and I figured it was probably promoted by spooks back then as it is now. So anyway, on a lark waiting at the doctor's office recently I decided to  crack open Wikipedia to find out more. 

It turns out that the impetus for the original Flat Earth Society (the Zetetic Society) can be traced to the 1849 pamphlet and 1881 book attributed to Samuel Birley Rowbotham.  Tellingly, he went by the moniker “Parallax”. Sounds like a modern online spook handle, doesn't it? These people don't change much: they hate to exist under their own names and always have to hiding behind some alias. Anyway, he apparently went up and down England trying to convince people the Earth was flat. We are denied any information on Rowbotham's background, but it's worth noting that there are 7 Rowbothams and 106 Birleys listed at thepeerage.com. The Wikipedia page on him details many of the same lies, dissembling and rhetorical sleights-of-hand that one sees in the recent Flat Earth renaissance. 

The key to understanding who this Rowbotham was is where Wiki tells us that he started out as “an organizer of an Owenite commune in the Fens.” If you don't know why that's a towering red flag, see Miles' paper on Engels and Owen. . ** [In fact, if you haven't read it, stop now and go read it. The dirt on Owen starts at page 10.] It's not entirely clear which commune he was allegedly involved with, but it was probably the Cambridgeshire Colony, which was founded by Methodist minister William Hodson, who is a ghost but may have been related to  another spook by the same name.

This colony clues us in on a few things about Owen and his movement, so it's worth a short detour. To begin with, if we follow the link on Rowbotham's page to 'Owenism,' we get this: 

Utopian socialist economic thought such as Owen’s was a reaction to the laissez-faire impetus of Malthusian Poor Law reform... Owen’s Plan began as grandiose but otherwise not exceptionally unusual workhouse scheme to place the unemployed poor in newly built rural communities. 

The New Poor Law enacted in England in 1834 all but ended charity for the poor and required them to work in workhouses. So basically the Owenite plan simply tried to put a sugar coating on the idea of the workhouse. Conditions there were presumably only marginally better than conditions in non-Owenist workhouses, but both followed the policy of 'less eligibility,' whereby the conditions in workhouses had to be worse than conditions outside so there was a deterrent to claiming poor relief. 

Don't get me wrong, I think the ideas of cooperatives and genuine profit-sharing are great. But that's not what these tycoons like Owen had in mind, which Miles showed in his paper. Beyond that, these schemes—including the Cambridgeshire Colony—appear designed to completely discredit the idea that businesses could be operated cooperatively. Note that every single one of the socialist utopian communities mentioned on the Owenism Wikipedia page ended in failure fairly quickly. [One of these was in Kendal, Ohio, whose  Quaker residents included Mayhew Folger, his sister and her husband,  Thomas Coffin. All big spook families, as we have seen.] 

As if being destined for economic failure was not enough to discredit the idea of cooperative businesses and profit sharing, many of the people involved in these schemes promoted ideas and lifestyles that were anathema to working-class values. For example,  a Daily Mail article on the Cambridgeshire Colony leads with this: 'The long-lost site of an infamous Victorian colony of “free love” socialists which encouraged wife-swapping has been discovered by archaeologists.' Yes, I'm sure wife-swapping went over really well with regular folk in 1835. Other Owenites promoted radical atheism (another thing that Marx himself would later do to ensure that Marxism never gained traction among the working class), vegetarianism and in some cases spiritualism, which was of course a precursor to the Theosophy project.her project set out to discredit socialism. Is it any wonder that an early organizer of one of these communes went on to kick-start the Flat Earth project? 

[Miles here: I did a little more research on Rowbotham. Unlike Josh, I find this paper quite important: I probably get a lot more emails on the subject than he does. In fact, I got one today. It is no use arguing science with these people, since they don't know any, but exposing the whole project as a fraud should shut them up permanently. So connecting Flat Earth incontrovertibly to the same crypto-Jewish families in the peerage that we have outed as responsible for all other scams is an easy masterstroke. As we would expect, this Samuel Birley Rowbotham has been scrubbed from the peerage and most genealogies. However, we do find a later Samuel Rowbotham from the same area, who may be his son or other descendant. His wife was a Brocklehurst daughter of a Bancroft, indicating links to the peerage. Another indication of this is that both Rowbotham and his wife were from Macclesfield, Cheshire. Macclesfield Castle was built by the Dukes of Buckingham, and this area of Cheshire has always had great wealth. At the time of our story, Macclesfield was the largest producer of finished silk in the world, having 71 silk mills in 1832. Of course this links us directly to the East India Company and the Jewish interests behind it. We also find a Victor Samuel Rowbotham, b. 1884, who was connected to Johannesburg, South Africa, indicating the same thing. His son was John Neville Rowbotham, and his father was Benjamin Rowbotham, of Treforest, Wales. Treforest links us to the Crawshay family and the Halls, Barons Llanover. Crawshay, Cornwall and Moser was a major ironworks firm in the 1800s, and Crawshay, its head, is the one who built Cyfarthfa Castle. This also links us to the Jones and the Herberts, Barons Treowen. Note the Owen there, which is not a coincidence. The 1st Baron was a Major General before WWI. 

Which leads us to the peerage, where we find several Rowbothams, including Bridadier Guy Reginald Rowbotham, CBE. Also a George Rowbotham of Iffley (Oxford). These Rowbothams are related to the Rhys and Faulkners. 

But perhaps surprisingly, it is our Samuel Birley Rowbotham's middle name that really sets the bells to ringing. There are 106 Birleys in the peerage, and they are from Blackburn, Lancashire. Among them we find Joseph Hornby Birley, a sugar merchant at Newton in Makerfield. He is an ancestor of actress Rosamund Pike. The Birleys are also closely related to the Peels. This is important because at the time of our story, a Peel was Prime Minister. This indicates our Samuel Birley Rowbotham was not only from the peerage in both the Birley and Rowbotham lines, he was also closely related to Sir Robert Peel, Home Secretary and Prime Minister from 1822-46. Since the Home Secretary is one of the head spooks, this explains how Rowbotham was recruited for this project. Being an agent, it also explains why he is so well scrubbed in the mainstream documents.] 

Other early Flat Earth promoters are also suspect, such as William Carpenter, who was also a Moss. You can go to his page for more. The most prominent supporter, who also bankrolled the Zetetic Society, was Lady Elizabeth de Sodington Blount. In 1874 she married Sir Walter de Sodington Blount, 9th Baronet, who is said to have been born on December 19, 1833. Judging by the numerology alone, these were a couple of major spooks.  According to Wikipedia, 'for nearly 400 years Sodington remained the principal seat of one of England’s most prominent families – Sir Walter Blount even appears as a leading character in  Shakespeare’s Henry IV.' Yes, Elizabeth's husband was a direct descendant of Sir  Walter Blount who was a supporter of John of Gaunt, Duke of Lancaster. Read Miles's paper on  Henry VII to see why that's a huge red flag. 

[Miles again, with more on William Carpenter. We saw in my paper on the Carpenters (musical duo) that this name is another one from the families. They are prominent in the peerage as well. We find many William Carpenters there, though none born in 1830. We do however find one born in 1800, who had two sons, not listed. This is probably the one we seek, since he married a Forbes, daughter of the 5th Baronet. We would expect our Flat Earth spook William Carpenter to be the son of a Forbes, wouldn't we? His father was a graduate of Trinity College, a Reverend Doctor, a Chaplain on the Isle of Man, and later Vicar at St. Jude, Liverpool. That also sounds about right. William Carpenter's great-uncle was General Forbes, Lord High Commissioner of the Church of Scotland, and his uncle was a judge in the East India Company. The Carpenters had been the Earls of Tyrconnell in the 18th century, and they soon married the Beresfords, Marquesses of Waterford. Through the Beresfords they were closely related to the Stuarts and Lindsays. This is our link between Carpenter and Lady Blount, since the Blount Baronets were closely related to the Molyneux, who were closely related to the Forbes, who were related to the Stuarts, and so on. Lady Blount was probably bored and asked to assigned to some project. The Zetetic/Flat Earth Society being a low ranking project of little consequence, it was thought she couldn't do much harm.]

The moribund Zetetic Society was rebirthed as the Flat Earth Society in 1956 by Samuel Shenton. His genealogy is not available, but there are several indicators on his Wikipedia entry that he was following the same pattern. Most strikingly is that, despite having allegedly dropped out of elementary school and being a Flat Earth promoter, he was elected into the Royal Astronomical and Royal Geographic societies. This makes absolutely no sense, unless we understand that Shenton was actually enlisted as an ally of the scientific aristocracy. So we see the Flat Earth society coming right out of the Royal Scientific Societies in the 1950s, just as it is now coming right out of NASA and SpaceX. Apparently it had been decided long ago that accusing someone of being a Flat Earther would be a good way for the mainstream to discredit those who criticized accepted dogma. And now of course they are using it to discredit anyone who questions the propaganda that the Mockingbird media spoon feeds a dumbed-down populace. Everything old is new again. 

[Miles, one more time: You will not be surprised to hear that there are also Shentons in the peerage, related to these same people. See Seymour Shenton, who married the daughter of General Maunsell in 1924. These Maunsells were the heads of Maunsell Bank, Limerick, and General Maunsell was of the East India Company. There are 1300 Maunsells in the peerage, and they are related to the Beresfords, de Veres, Beauchamps, Eyres, Flemings, Montagues, Livingstones, and Kers. Through the Beresfords, we can link the Shentons to the Carpenters, tying together those two agents in the same project across a century. Tellingly, a Yvonne Shenton married a Barclay in 1939, which of course links us to Barclays Bank. Her grandfather-in-law was the 11th Baronet Barclay of Pierston, CMG. An Elizabeth Shenton married a Dusautoy, and her grandson married a Bradshaw, daughter of a Stewart and a Hoare. Through the Hoares we link to the Rogers and Bennetts, eventually arriving at. . . Jennifer Aniston. 

Which reminds us some current stars claim to be Flat Earthers, including Shaquille O'Neal, Kyrie Irving, Tila Tequila, and B.o.B. Looks like another blackwashing, since who is going to follow the scientific opinions of those folks? If you don't think NASA or SpaceX is 100% legit, you may be lumped in with those known brainiacs. 

In looking into that, I tripped across something else strange. In  this People Magazine article of 2017, we are told musician Thomas Dolby (She Blinded Me with Science) accepted membership in the “reconvened” Flat Earth Society of 2009 as member #1—despite not believing in Flat Earth. Even weirder is the name of the head of the reconvened Flat Earth Society: Daniel Shenton. You will say he is just the son or grandson of Samuel Shenton. You would think so, but that isn't the story. People tells us Daniel only started doing research into Flat Earth in the 1990's, cued by Dolby's album of 1984. If Daniel were the son of Samuel, you would think he would already know about Flat Earth, right? 

And why would Flat Earth reconvene in 2009? Was some new use for Flat Earth discovered in 2009? Or should I say, is it just a coincidence that 2009 is when my science site really lit up, gaining traction in the mainstream? Remember, my first book came out in 2010, in response to mainstream demand, and to compile the huge number of important science papers I had written in the past five years. You will pardon me for seeing Flat Earth as a direct response to my arrival on the scene. It was tailor-made to address just the sort of danger I am posing to the mainstream, and it has always been aimed directly at me. They have been trying to tar me with this baby from the beginning, though it has never stuck to me for a moment. It is as if I am slathered in tasty butter, which no tarbaby can stick to. That's just the way it is, and the way it will remain, so you may as well retire the project, guys. It is just embarrassing that this is all you've got to answer me with. In trying to tarnish me, you just end up burnishing me and varnishing me. Maddening, isn't it?

*Dubay has offered the following argument (not original to him) to explain why the powers that be (Freemasons in his telling) would try to trick us into believing the Earth was a globe: “by removing Earth from the motionless center of the universe, the Masons have moved us physically and metaphysically from a place of supreme importance to one of complete nihilistic indifference. If the Earth is the center of the universe then the ideas of God, creation, and a purpose for human existence are resplendent but if the Earth is but one of billions of planets revolving around billions of stars and billions of galaxies, then the ideas of God, creation, and a specific purpose for Earth and human existence become highly implausible. So by surreptitiously indoctrinating us into their scientific materialist Sun worship, not only do we lose faith in anything beyond the material, we gain absolute faith in materiality, superficiality, status, selfishness, hedonism and consumerism.” 

Sounds good on the surface, right? But there are at least two problems with this: First, do they really need Flat Earth to turn us into superficial materialists? No. They were doing that quite successfully with or without Flat Earth. Second, to explain all of the different things that contradict FE, proponents like Dubay have to come up with new and evermore convoluted explanations. There have been so many that FE theory at this point resembles a jerry-rigged Rube Goldberg contraption. But the idea that the Earth is a globe explains all these different phenomena in one fell swoop. Let's take a moment to consider this, because it really blows up the whole logic behind FE. If the Earth is flat, it means human beings are special, because God put us at the center of the universe. And yet, somehow, this flat Earth was constructed in an extremely elaborate manner so that it would be wholly consistent with the theory that we live on a spinning globe. So let's say you believe that God created the Flat Earth. Well that means that God created it purposely to make it seem as if it's a spinning globe. That means it's part of God's plan. Why would he do that to us? If we're so significant and so much at the center of the universe, then why wouldn't God create the Flat Earth in a way that is transparently, obviously flat. Is he in cahoots with the Masons? 

Finally, I find it maddening that Flat Earth promoters always tell you to believe your own eyes. But then when you bring up visual evidence, such as the fact that boats disappear off the horizon from the bottom-up or that when there are clouds in the sky the sun appears to dip below them before setting off the distant horizon, they instead offer up some convoluted explanation about why you should not, in fact, trust your eyes.

** I came across an article by a Jewish socialist recalling an encounter with Engels that confirms Miles's contention that Engels was Jewish: 'He read to me in Russian and also a few lines in Yiddish from the Arbeiter Zeitung. “Do you think I can’t read loshn koydesh?” [note: in Yiddish that means “the holy tongue,” i.e., Hebrew] he asked…. “No wonder the capitalist press claims that I am also a Jew.”' So basically Engels spoke Yiddish and could read Hebrew and was rumored to have been Jewish at that time by newspapers (which were also owned by Jews). Also of interest in that article is in regards to Marx being Jewish. Of course the mainstream says he wasn't technically Jewish since his dad converted to Christianity before he was born and had Marx christened. But in this article the author also mentions meeting one of Marx's grown daughters, Eleanor: 'Once, standing with me among a group of our Jewish socialists, she put her arm around me and said, “We Jews have special obligations to work for the working class.” As the reader knows, her mother was Christian and even her father was raised as a Christian because his parents were baptized when he was still a small child. But she liked to refer to herself as a Jewish child.' I'd say we can take that as further confirmation of what Miles discovered in his paper on Jenny Marx.

http://mileswmathis.com/flat.pdf

KINGSMEN THE GOLDEN ARISTOCRATS ...AND LOTS OF SPOOKS

Kingsmen 
the Golden Aristocrats

Written by a Miles' reader and published in November 2017@
http://mileswmathis.com/index.html


The Spectre of Fakeness

At the beginning of the James Bond movie Spectre, which Miles wrote a paper about,1 there is a dialogue between two Italian criminals that starts with the question “When do we blow the stadium?” After Bond kills them and demolishes a few buildings, he explains his actions to his boss by saying: “Well, better half a block than a whole stadium full of people.” Since nothing actually involves a stadium in the movie, this reference seems a bit odd. I assume it was purposely added as one of many clues. 

The private consortium (Joint Intelligence Service) controlled by Spectre that wants to take over M.I6 in the movie seems to be based on G.C.H.Q, the N.S.A’s UK counterpart. The construction of its new H.Q in 2003 was “at a cost of £330m ... funded by a private finance initiative (P.F.I) put forward by a collective that included British facilities management and construction company Carillion, the Danish security company Group 4/Falck (now G.4.S), and the British telecommunications company B.T Group. The consortium are scheduled to be paid £800m to maintain the Doughnut for 30 years. The creation of the Doughnut was the largest P.F.I project to date for the British government”. 

*******

[Addendum November 17, 2017: I made a quick, rough search on those private companies that financed the construction of the GCHQ complex. On the  list of officers of the British Telecommunications (B.T) Group, having its H.Q in the City of London, there is a director Anthony Frank Elliott  Ball, who was a former officer of Inside Track II & Inside Track III L.L.P (formerly Inside Films/Inside Track Films). Te name Ball links us back to Miles' research on the Balls. George Washington was a Ball. 

I  googled up Inside Track III L.L.P and I found this article: celebrities' tax avoidance schemes. “The tax demands are said to add up to more than £500 million and could total as much as £1 billion.” “Ingenious' investment schemes included Inside Track Productions, Inside Track 1 L.L.P and Inside Track 2 L.L.P, of which investors became directors.” So, one of the directors of a company that invested in the construction of the new G.C.H.Q complex was an officer of companies that were involved in tax avoidance schemes. What a joy. 

Keith Robertson Cochrane, the Chief Executive of Carillion, for example, had 72 appointments in total. A pretty busy guy, huh? Currently, he has only two, the last one was made on 8 September 2017 in a company that deals with extraction of crude petroleum. At the same time, Ashley Martin Almanza, one of the directors of G.4S, is also a director of a company called Noble Corporation, which also deals with extraction of crude petroleum. I guess these guys like stable companies. And tax avoidance – Noble Corp moved from the Cayman Islands to Switzerland to UK. Noble is another name from the families: think Nobel Prize. 

The heir presumptive of the current  Earl of Westmoreland is Hon. Harry St. Clair Fane. If you search him in the  Companies House register, you can see he has had 3 appointments. Two former and one current. Te former ones were at Ingenious Film Partners L.L.P (2005-2010) and Ingenious Film Partners 2 L.L.P (2006-2011). This relates to Elliott Ball from the B.T Group, who was a director at Inside Track II & Inside Track III (formerly Inside Films/Inside Track Films). As previously stated, these two companies were engaged in alleged £1 billion tax avoidance schemes in the film business, but it seems their originator was the investment group Ingenious Media. Its founder is Patrick McKenna and he is probably related to spook New Age guru and LSD pusher Terrence McKenna from Miles’s paper on the Unabomber. Both Ingenious Film Partners/2 and Inside Track II/III are registered at the same address (15 Golden Square, London, W1F 9JG) – it turns out  all four companies were involved in these schemes. I hope you caught the address: Golden Square, as in Golden Circle, Golden Triangle. Since the investors became their directors, this is why Fane was among them. When you read the news articles about this case, they mention only ‘celebrities’, not Earls like Fane and guys of his caliber.

What is also interesting here are two things. First, one of Fane’s ancestors from the 18th century, the 9th Earl of Westmoreland, was a Commissioner of Taxes. Second, if you look at Fane's profile, you can see he is still active in a company called Obsidian Objects d'Art Limited. Obsidian is a black rock, black being the preferred color of spooks. It should also remind us on the investment company  Black Rock mentioned in Miles's paper on  Lennon. This may link Obsidian to the Rockefeller's. Under 'Correspondence address' it says 31 Bruton Street, London, United Kingdom, W1J 6QS (Mayfair district in the City of Westminster); if you look it up on Google Maps, you find Harry Fane’s “Art Gallery”. When I read gallery, I think of portraits or other real art, but I see  no sign of this at his place. Mostly jewelry. 

But if you click on  Obsidian under Fane's profile, the 'Registered office address' is C/O Buzzacott Llp, 130 Wood Street, London, EC2V 6DL. Well, this is within the City of London. And Buzzacott is an accountant firm offering also tax planning, structuring, and advisory for businesses. Probably more to do with tax avoidance. Do these people do anything of value, other than stealing money? No wonder his  son is running around in super cars. 

The mother of Harry Fane's wife is a Grosvenor. They are the Dukes of Westminster. Also, George Orwell is a Fane. His great-grandfather Charles Blair was a wealthy country gentleman in Dorset who married Lady Mary Fane, daughter of the Earl of Westmorland. You will see him again below. 

I then tried to type in Bank of England, Secret Intelligence Service, Security Service, or Government Communications Headquarters in the UK’s Companies House register.  Any luck? The Bank of England got the royal charter in 1694, so it's a royal chartered company, but there is no information about it in the register. If you read the Intelligence Services Act 1994, you will notice that MI6 and G.C.H.Q are written as ‘Secret Intelligence Service’ and ‘Government Communications Headquarters’. 

If they are not on the  list of the royal chartered companies and not in other company registers, where are they registered? It is the same if you type in Home Office or Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs – zero results (they are not royal chartered companies). This reminded me of something. Do you remember Josh's analysis in the paper on  Ghandi of the Temple area (owned by the Knights Templar) in the City of London, “one of the main legal districts of the capital and a notable center for English law, both historically and in the present day”, still described as an “extra-parochial” area, which Josh assumes is a tax haven? Could they be registered there? I later typed in David Edwin Pepper(b. 1948), former head of G.C.H.Q. It seems that from May 2007 to September 2008 he was a  director of a company called Friends of the Cotswolds (a charity). Under Correspondence Address it says ‘Gchq, Hubble Road, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, FL51 [sic] 0EX’. Well, this is an  official address of G.C.H.Q. If it is an organization and has an address, it should be registered somewhere. But it looks like we found one of our fronts. British Secret Service is hiding behind fake charities.

I tried to find our main intelligence agency in our register of companies and it isn't listed either, despite having a government web page and a publicly displayed address, with its name always written in the same way (our ministries and other state and local bodies, including the government and parliament, are all registered in the one and only companies register, for example). Maybe the official name of these Intel organizations is totally different, but they should be in the register, or some register. If not, how do they get the money from the state? Unless they use front companies for such purposes. 

Maybe this is the case, since on the web page of MI6 history it says: “At first the Foreign and Home Sections shared an office, but Mansfield Cumming soon decided he needed his own base – and one that provided him with accommodation. He settled on Ashley Mansions in Vauxhall Bridge Road and early in 1910 set up a bogus address with the Post Office – Messrs Rasen, Falcon Limited, a firm of ‘shippers and exporters’. This was the first example of what has since then become the classic ‘import/export’ espionage cover and anything sent to this address was forwarded to him at Ashley Mansions.” In this way, they avoid being audited by hiding behind the concept of business secrecy.] 

*******

There actually exist two real UK organisations called Joint Intelligence Organisation and Joint Intelligence Committee which oversee, direct and support MI5, MI6, G.C.H.Q, and the Defense Intelligence. So the change in title for the movie was razor thin. The new G.C.H.Q complex was built right after 9/11, at the time when the D.H.S was founded in the States. The current director is Jeremy Fleming (since 2017, former MI5 deputy director), while one of the former directors was David Pepper (see Sgt. Pepper on the Beatles’ album, who was in real life Maj. John Pepper, head of BSC/MI6 in the US in the late 1940's). When you see Fleming, you should also think of Ian Fleming, who wrote the Bond books. 

The movie was released on October 26 (8+8), 2015 (=8), and a day later the CIA and the George Washington University co-hosted a panel titled The Shared 21st Century International Mission featuring “CIA Director John Brennan, former UK MI6 Chief John Sawers, Director of the French Directorate for External Security Bernard Bajolet, and former Israeli National Security Advisor Yaacov Amidror”.3 I believe that by now you understand what their shared 21st century international mission is all about: chasing fictitious terrorists, among other things. 

Two weeks later in November, on Friday the 13th, the Paris attacks took place. They started with three explosions which occurred outside the country's national sports stadium Stade de France. The first and second explosions occurred in front of the stadium, since the terrorists were prevented entering inside, while the third one happened in a McDonald’s restaurant, or “some distance away from any discernible target” (it seems they can’t agree on this one). All three were suicides. The Paris attacks are considered to be the deadliest in France since WW2.4

Another noteworthy thing from the movie was the Spectre meeting in Rome, where, among other things, they talked about their investments in the drugs sector (pharmaceuticals, not illicit drugs):5 

[...] pharmacy sites has provided an excellent new sales platform. We have adapted many of them into clearinghouses for unapproved drugs. In addition to which, the latest figures show that we presently control 70% of antimalarial vaccines, 34% of H.I.V., and 40% of all ontological drugs across Sub-Saharan Africa. But we face challenges from the WHO in their campaign against our counterfeit pharmaceuticals [...]

Enter Kingsman 

At the beginning of 2015, on January 29 (1+11),6 before Spectre, another British spy movie was released – Kingsman: the Secret Service. Both the good Kingsman and the evil Spectre are private or privately-backed intelligence agencies. They also operate as front organisations: Spectre as environmentalists etc., while the Kingsman's cover is a tailor shop located (in real life) at 11 Savile Row in London.7

What made me write this paper was something from the Kingsman's sequel Kingsman: the Golden Circle, released on September 22, 2017 in the US. You can read the entire plot yourselves on Wiki, and watch the movie for graphics, I am only going to mention a few things that are mostly related to Miles' papers on the Las Vegas hoax and Harvey Weinstein scandal.8,9

Before I had seen it in the movies two weeks ago, I had a feeling that there would be something related to the Vegas shooting, which happened nine days after the movie was released in the States. I think John Denver's song Take me home, country roads and the Statesman's (Kingsman's buddies from the US) cowboy approach from the trailers is what triggered my hunch, since the Vegas victims attended a country music festival. Plus, it is a British spy movie with Taron Egerton as the main actor (Miles mentioned him in his paper on Ben Franklin).10 If you put all this together it seems a series of coincidences just like the ones with Spectre and the Paris attacks, with all the four events (two major British spy movie releases and two record-breaking hoaxes) taking place in the same part of the year: September, October, November. That is the time of Fall, one of the annual low points, or charge field minimums, another one possibly being in February, at the time of Valentine’s Day. [Richmond Valentine, a technology tycoon who wants to reduce the world population, and is mostly dressed in red, is the main villain in the first Kingsman movie.]10.1

If the hoax from Paris is the deadliest in France to date, the one from Vegas is the deadliest in the USA.  11 A coincidence? I don't think so. These events are planned well in advance and scriptwriters can change their scripts any time during production. 

The main clue in the movie is the password needed to save the world: Viva Las Vegan, a word play on the famous song Viva Las Vegas. Based on the previous paragraph, I don't think this has anything to do with the vegan mindset, or any philosophical message related to it. It simply links us to Vegas. Besides, Poppy the villain uses a machine for grinding meat to grind un-loyal workers, making McDonald's-like burgers out of them. That links us to Paris. Moreover, Poppy (heroin is made from a type of poppy) is the head of the world's largest drug cartel, and I am sure there is a lot of drug use in Vegas, the entertainment capital of the world. Another similarity with Spectre is the stadium reference, in this case a real one, since people who consumed her poisoned recreational drugs were put in cages and quarantined in a football stadium. The President of the US wanted to leave them die, so he would win the War on Drugs; if he succeeded, a mass death would occur, just as there was “the deadliest mass shooting” in Vegas. Another subliminal is Merlin's (equivalent to Q tech guru from J.B) suicide death – most terrorists, including the one from Vegas, are scripted to die like this. (The name Merlin should remind you on the Merlin-looking guy from the paper on the NRO.)13

What also reminds me of the Vegas hoax is one of the Statesman’s buildings which somehow looks like the Mandalay Bay Hotel, at least to me. You may think it’s a stretch, but Mandalay is colored gold, and Vegas has been run by criminals for the last century, just as the Golden Circle from the movie is a criminal organisation. 

I googled ‘Mandalay Bay golden circle’ and it turns out there is a Golden Circle Section (category A) seating location at the Mandalay Bay Theater. The term golden/gold circle is used also at other venues outside Vegas to mean the best seating location, and I haven’t been able to trace the origins of the term, so I can’t prove whether it is something peculiar to Mandalay, or Vegas in general. Note the relation to the theater above – the hoax itself was actually a kind of open-air theater.

Strangely, Poppy also invests in “latest technology”. Could this be a reference to L-3 Technologies (of the body scanners meant to be installed in Vegas casinos) owned by Vanguard that Miles mentioned in his paper? Note also that she presents herself as the CEO of Golden Circle. I wonder who the owners are. 

There is something else about Poppy’s organisation [AND MILES SAYS PAY ATTENTION HERE]. The Statesman’s HQ is in Kentucky, their front organisation being a Bourbon whiskey company by the same name. Well, there was a secret society in the mid-19th century called The Knights of the Golden Circle (K.G.C) which was founded in 1854 in Kentucky. Their founder was George Washington Lafayette Bickley and one of the alleged members was John Wilkes Booth. The K.G.C are labelled as a “paramilitary” type of society and their purpose was the US annexation of the so called Golden Circle – Mexico, Central America, northern South America, Cuba, and the rest of the Caribbean.17 Since both Bickley and Booth are part of the top families, and since the Golden Circle was annexed by the those families, we have a big clue here. 

According to the Wikipedia page on the movie, after the “destruction of all Kingsman property at the hands of The Golden Circle, Kingsman Tailors is relocated on St James's Street beside Berry Bros. & Rudd” (wine and spirit merchants). Now, if you go to Google Maps, you will find that there is a “Republic of Texas Plaque” nearby. It tells us that between 1836 and 1845, these wine merchants in London were the landlords of the Embassy of the Republic of Texas, which was above the wine shop. That's weird, eh? Is that a pointer to the shooting hoax in Texas? Maybe. 

For more weirdness, Napoleon III supposedly “lived there in exile while plotting his return to France”. Why was he living in the Republic of Texas embassy? It seems this was a spook nest, and may be one even to this day. On the other side of the street is Mark Masons' Hall, indicating this may be one of the most important streets in London. The third movie will probably start here, since in the sequel, one of the US Statesman agents comes to work in London. I have a feeling, based on the surnames (fictitious and real-life) present in the Kingsman franchise, that these sequels have/will have something to do with Miles’s paper on Benjamin Franklin, i.e. the American Revolution and independence.17.1,17.2,17.3,17.4,17.5

Four more things and I’m done. First, the words of the Statesman’s traitor agent about the fact that if they leave all those drug users to die there would be no more drug users, and the Statesman’s stock would rise as a result, reminded me of Miles’ comments about why Jim Murren sold his shares just before the Vegas shooting (so Vanguard could buy them as cheap as possible and make huge profits afterwards). 

Second, Poppy is selling illicit drugs, but when she appears on TV, you can see “Poppy’s pharmaceuticals” in the background. This is probably because she produced the antidotes to her own poisoned drugs and wants to sell them to the US government in exchange for immunity and the legalization of illicit drugs. We can find a similar thing in Spectre, where they discuss their pharmaceutical business at their meeting in Rome. While making this paper, I stumbled upon an article from August 2017 with the title Drugs sector first to get industrial strategy boost with plan launch next week. It is about Britain’s plan to stimulate their economy ahead of Brexit by reviving the drugs sector, which is now worth around £60bn.18 A coincidence? Record-breaking mass shootings in both the US and UK, and they want to revive the drugs sector? [Miles: sorry, I thought the drugs sector was already flush. Everyone in the US and Europe are already on multiple prescriptions. How do you revive something that isn't dead? Again, we see them misusing words like “revive” on purpose.] 

Third, what does “Kingsman” really refer to? The real tailor shop from London is called Huntsman. Its basic meaning is of course ‘king’s man’, but there are two other options that are more specific. The King’s Men was “the acting company to which William Shakespeare belonged for most of his career”.18.1 Miles wrote a paper about Shakespeare recently, in which the surname de Vere appeared. You will see why this is important in just a moment. 

Also, ‘Kingsman’ (pl. kingsmen) is the lowest enlisted rank in the Duke of Lancaster's Regiment of the British Army. This of course takes us to Miles’ paper on Henry VII, where he shows the War of the Roses (House of York vs. House of Lancaster, both being branches of the House of Plantagenet, resulting in a win for the House of Tudor) was actually managed by the Stanley's, Kings of Man, Anglesey being a part of their territory.19



 Which brings us back to the beginning of this paper, where we can see Taron Egerton from Anglesey as the gentleman spy on the cover picture. And William Stanley was also mentioned in Miles’ paper on Shakespeare, another Intel project done by the top families from the peerage, including Bacon, the disciple of the spy master John Dee.20 Spook markers galore, as Miles would say. 

Fourth, Wiki says that the film Golden Circle was co-produced with 20th Century-Fox, which is owned by 21st Century-Fox, Vanguard being its third biggest shareholder.21,22  Plus, the Huntsman tailor shop “was acquired by Pierre Lagrange, executive producer of Vaughn’s movies since Stardust”.23 Never heard of this guy, but Miles will recognize that surname. Joseph-Louis Lagrange was one of the most important mathematicians of the Enlightenment. As for Pierre Lagrange, he founded GLG Partners, which is owned by the Man Group, supposedly the UK’s largest alternative investment management business. The Man Group was founded by James Man (cf. the Isle of Man), bringing us back to the Stanley's, Kings of Man.24

So the question is, who put the Vegas references in the movie? Vanguard? The Man Group? And does the Harvey Weinstein case relate to this somehow?

Vaughn's Genealogy

The director of this film, Matthew Vaughn, is actually Matthew Allard de Vere Drummond Vaughn. Which reminds us of a couple of things. One, the de Veres were mentioned in Miles' paper on the Shakespeare Intel project, one of them being a top candidate for the real Shakespeare. Also, we remember that an Elisabeth de Vere married a Stanley. Two, the surname Vaughn is a variant of Vaughan, as in David Vaughan Icke, whom Miles has also written a paper about.25 Matthew Vaughn is using this surname only in his professional life, while in his private life he uses the surnames of his biological father, George Albert Harley de Vere Drummond—an English aristocrat who is a godson of King George VI. 26 One of Vaughn's children is named Cosima Violet, which is the feminine version of the name Cosimo—as in Cosimo de Medici, whom Miles outed as a probable crypto Jew in his paper on the Kabbalah.27 And just like the de Medicis were promoting the Corpus Hermeticum during their time, the de Veres, Stanleys, Bacons, and others were promoting Shakespearian plays and other similar things in their time. Plus, some have claimed that Bacon wrote or edited the Authorized King James Version of the Bible, which means this same group of aristocrats I just mentioned may have cooperated on this project as well.28,29  So, to put it bluntly, the spook business is literally in Vaughn's veins. He isn't the director here by accident. 

As Miles has boldly observed, the spooks (and aristocrats) like to reference themselves and their past projects. We find this in the first Kingsman movie, where one of the agents goes undercover to meet the main villain at his home. Let's see what surname he took as a cover: 29.1

Mr. DeVere. It's a pleasure to meet you. 
--I'm awfully sorry. I seem to have my dates muddled up. 
Oh, no no no. I cancelled the gala because of you. Anybody willing to donate that much deserves a private dinner. Come in. 
--Thank you. Gotta admit, I was really intrigued to meet you. There aren't many billionaires I don't know. 
--I don't doubt it. 
Obviously, I've had my people looking into your... affairs and that's some pretty old money you're from. How'd your folks make it? 
--Property, mostly. Property in the markets. Nothing personal, if that's your concern. 

If you think the de Vere reference was just a chance, you should consider most of the characters' surnames from the franchise. The main hero, played by Taron Egerton, is called Gary Unwin,  whose father is Lee Unwin. I thought Un-win was some kind of joke, but it actually comes from the peerage.

[Miles: GeorgeAllen&Unwin is a prominent British book publisher. They published J.R.R. Tolkien's works. Also the works of Bertrand Russell, Gandhi, and Roald Dahl—who is admitted to have worked for B.S.C/MI6. The firm was founded by Sir Stanley Unwin, b. 1884. Note the name Stanley, which links us back to research above. It is unclear at first why these Unwins are in the peerage, since they don't link to any peers. However, we do find Unwin's daughter married a Brodrick, whose brother was Viscount Midleton. A few years earlier, an Edythe Unwin married a Thomson, and their daughter married John Norman Stuart Buchan, Baron Tweedsmuir. Their daughter married a Douglas-Hamilton of the Dukes of Hamilton. This links them closely and immediately to the Percys, Dukes of Northumberland, and the Gordon-Lennoxes, Dukes of Richmond. Wow. Also to the Stuarts, Grants, Pagets, Grevilles, Villiers, Crichtons, Grosvenors, Wellesleys, and. . Egertons. Remember, the star of Kingsman is an Egerton.] 

The same applies to the main villain from the first movie,  Richmond Valentine (alias Mr. V). Both are actually surnames from the peerage. Was the choice based on Col.  Valentine Patrick Terrell Vivian, a former vice-chief of MI6, his nickname being “Vee-Vee (as head of Section V)”? Doesn't Vivian look remarkably like George Orwell (Eric Arthur Blair)? 

Vivian (1886–1969) supposedly started his career as a superintendent in the Indian Imperial Police and became “an assistant director of central intelligence” in India. Orwell (1903– 1950) worked for the Indian Imperial Police too, as an assistant district superintendent, in the same period. A coincidence? Vivian's brother was Percival Vivian – remember this for later (he was also the “author of the first dictionary of literary terms written in English and other works on literature and literary history”; this relates both to Orwell's literary career and the Shakespeare project). 

[Miles: a bit more info on the name Valentine. It was the writer Henry Miller's middle name. And we saw it in my paper on Mark Twain. Remember, the grandfather of Eleanor Roosevelt was Valentine G. Hall. His daughter Edith married William Forbes Morgan, of the Morgan bankers. Valentine Hall was also obscenely wealthy, and he lived in a mansion at 16 Gramercy Park in New York, which later became the infamous Players Club—where many spooks hung out, including John Wilkes Booth. Turns out Booth and Hall were closely related through the Tonnelles, Rathbones and Wetmores. All these families were in the mercantile business, being linked to the East India Company and also trading in the West Indies. They were also Jewish. For more recent indication of that, see  Donald Valentine of the peerage, who in about 1950 married Anne Douglass Gould, daughter of Jay Gould II and Anne Douglass Graham. These are the Goulds of New York who ran many railroads, including the Western Pacific. Of course the Grahams are equally wealthy, being the Dukes of Montrose. We also find a Mary Louise Valentine marrying a Sir John Fox in 1880. Her father was John Sutherland Valentine, scrubbed in thepeerage, but the Sutherlands were dukes, related to the Leveson-Gowers, Howards, Cavendishes, Gordons, Stanleys, and Egertons. And of course  the Foxes we have seen before. It is a variation of the name Fuchs. The earliest Valentine mentioned in the peerage is Robert Valentine, about 1650. Other than that the Valentines are extraordinarily well scrubbed. With more research, we find a Valentine Fleming, who was the father of Ian Fleming. He is in Burke's peerage, p. 207. That ties in directly to our question here, doesn't it? We also find a Lt. Col. Alwyn Valentine Paget, linking us to the Pagets of the peerage, Earls of Uxbridge.]

Two side notes about Orwell. In 1927, he lived on Portobello Road in London. 

 Door no. 22    1950 – 1903 = 47 

Strangely, there is only one photo of Valentine Vivian on the web. When I saw his photo, it immediately reminded me on Orwell ... and also Hitler. It is the mustache of course. In his paper on  Chomsky Miles wrote: “You probably thought Big Brother was based on Hitler, with that mustache [on one of the covers of his book 1984]. Nope, Big Brother is a portrait of Orwell himself. Strange that Orwell had that mustache throughout the war, don't you think?” Today, I don't find it strange, since it appears this was a typical mustache worn by the males of the upper class, or at least a part of it. And since Vivian, Orwell, and Hitler had ties to the British peerage, I wouldn't be surprised if they were actually related. Hitler's half brother Alois from Liverpool also had such a mustache (I got his photo from Jewish Business News—I'm not sure if he is his real brother, the point being the mustache and the connection to Britain).

But the weirdness continues to crescendo. If we do much research on the Las Vegas event, we trip across this: in November 2016, a Vivian Valentine from Las Vegas was allegedly run over and killed by a black pickup truck near the Las Vegas Strip (Channel 8 Drive and Las Vegas Boulevard). She was 62 (=8), while the driver was 47. She  came to the US with her husband (who died when their son was 13) in 1985 (=13) “to escape the Romanian dictatorship” and eventually became a realtor in Vegas. The  interview with her 23-year old son was done by the  KTNV Channel 13 Action News, located at 3355 S. Valley View Blvd, Las Vegas. Yes, there is a thing called ‘action news’ in the States. I found no Vivian Valentine from Nevada on  Find A Grave or in the  Social Security Death Index.  

If you think we are done with the British peers, you are wrong. Almost all characters' surnames from the Kingsman films come from the peerage: Adams, Hart, King, Spencer, Montague, Morton, Herring, Giles, Higins(/Higgins), Barker,Arnold, Hesketh and Fox. Oh, and  Elton John, who plays himself. Remember, comedian Rowan Atkinson  made fun of the fact that Elton uses a surname as his first name – something Miles has noticed about the peers in the last few years of his research. 

Also, the code names of the Kingsman agents are taken after the knights of the Round Table (or characters related to the Arthurian legends): Galahad, Lancelot, Percival (cf. Percival Vivian from before), and Merlin. Their boss, Chester King, is code named Arthur (King Arthur). Another nest of probable noble spooks. 

And there is yet another strange connection related to Matthew Vaughn and his movie franchise. As I previously said, the Kingsman's cover is a tailor shop located at 11 Savile Row in London. The Beatles' Apple Corps used to be at 3 Savile Row, and after they had invested in Dandie Fashions boutique, they renamed it Apple Tailoring. One of the co-founders of Dandie Fashions, Tara Brown (whom Miles outed as a probable MI6 agent, along with the Beatles themselves), supposedly died in a car crash while on his way to the graphic artist David Vaughan. 29.2,29.3,29.4

[Addendum November 17, 2017:

Too many coincidences 

I watched the documentary Kingsman: The Secret Service Revealed about the making of the first movie 30 and in it we see the making of the scene of the mass shooting and fighting in a church in Kentucky. Turns out that now-famous scene is a marker to many false flags in the media. 

On August 5 (=13), 2012, there was a shooting massacre in a Sikh temple in Wisconsin. The killer shot six people, injured four others and committed suicide (he was a former psychological operations specialist in the US Army). All the six shot people were members of the Sikh faith, which is a religion from the Indian subcontinent, whose last guru was Gobind Singh (male Sikhs have 'Singh' as their middle or last name; the Singh surname was mandated by this guru and was later used by several castes and communities). The incident drew responses from Obama and the Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. The five male victims were Satwant Singh Kaleka (the founder of the temple), Prakash Singh, Sita Singh, Ranjit Singh, and Suveg Singh. 

Curiously, the temple founder's son is named Amardeep Singh Kaleka, an award-winning Indian-American film director who became involved in politics after his father’s death, supporting gun control, progressive economic reform, and the peace agenda. He even ran (unsuccessfully) in the Democratic primary for the US House of Representatives. But those who follow the alternative media will know him as the director of the documentary Sirius, which premiered on April 22, 2013, and is based on the ufologist Steven M. Greer’s book Hidden Truth, Forbidden Knowledge. Miles has already outed Greer in his paper on the nuclear program, and I provided a quote of Greer about his mother’s family involvement with the organization of the American Revolution. Besides the Singhs being historical rulers of India, there is a Hindi film clan by the surname Sinha – well, this is just a variation of the surname Singh. The  Singhs are found also in the British peerage. Therefore, I conclude this temple shooting was a fake event which served multiple purposes, among them Amardeep Singh Kaleka’s entry into US politics.31,32,33,34,35,36,37 

And as if this wouldn’t be enough, there was another Singh involved with the alternative (intel-controlled) media. Jeva Singh-Anand, a guy supposedly from Germany who supposedly translated the supposed authentic rituals and doctrines of the Bavarian Illuminati and texts written by Adolph Franz Friedrich Ludwig Knigge. Knigge was an aristocrat and supposedly a leading member of the Bavarian Illuminati (note the hidden hand in the pic below, as is the case with Marx, Napoleon, Washington, and Pope Bergoglio). 

Anyway, you can see on Wiki that a lot of people with the surname  Anand (Indian origin) worked/work in the entertainment business, with the  Anand-Sahni family being another one of the Hindi film clans. That means this guy belongs to two of them – Sinha/Singh and Anand. According to the latest book written by Leo Lyon Zagami, Jeva committed suicide in his basement in October 2015, after he joined the infamous Ordo Templi Orientis fraternity [Aleister Crowley] to try to learn more about their secrets and connections to Weishaupt’s Illuminati. His wife was supposedly a practicing witch and a member of the OTO, some people saying she was partly responsible for his “dramatic ending”. Spook markers galore with this guy. You can be rest assured he didn’t commit any suicide, and his wife wasn’t a witch. They were and are obvious agents. 

A word about Leo Lyon Zagami. I have known about this guy for several years and I must say he has been the most honest spook I have ever come across. He is actually an elite spook having been active in the alternative media since 2006, being a frequent guest of Alex Jones. Besides admitting he “worked” as an agent for the Italian spooks, and being a 33rd degree Freemason, he admits that on his mother’s side (Jessica  Lyon Young) he is related to the Queen Mother of England (also a Lyon). His maternal grandmother was the British writer Felicity Anne Cumming (alias Felicity Mason), who also worked for British intelligence. Since she was part of the top of the British aristocracy and worked for MI6, she was probably related to Mansfield George Smith Cumming, the first head of MI6, the original ‘C’. Strangely, this is what it says about Mansfield Cumming on their official  website:

He was an unusual choice, having neither intelligence experience nor linguistic skills. But he was recommended for the role due to ‘special qualifications'. He was, however, a workaholic and commenced his duties in October 1909, a week early. So it is no surprise that his diary entry for that first day stated that he ‘went to the office and remained all day, but saw no one, nor was there anything to do there.' 

I guess this is a misdirection-passage, possibly telling us he wasn’t any chief of intelligence. Anyway, Zagami’s paternal grandfather was the Senator and high-level Freemason Leopoldo Bartolomeo Zagami, while his paternal grandmother Lidia originated from two noble Sicilian families, the Di Gregorio and the Labruto. 

What a creep, eh? Note the 33 and the hand sign.[cannot locate that image D.C] 

Now let's go back to church/temple shootings. The markers don't stop here. The first Kingsman movie, featuring a mass shooting and fighting inside a church in Kentucky, was released in December 2014 and then in the US in January 2015. Five months later, on June 17 (1+7=8), 2015, there was the Charleston church shooting. I think it was a fake and at the bottom of its Wiki page there are links to other similar shootings, e.g. Baptist Church bombing in Alabama in 1963, the Unitarian Universalist church shooting in Tennessee in 2008, the Quebec City mosque shooting in 2017, the Burnette Chapel shooting again in Tennessee two months ago, and lastly the Sutherland Springs, Texas, (again Baptist) church shooting just recently on 5 November 2017. The killers were alleged Neo-Nazis, KKK, white supremacists, even Trump supporters etc., all the usual stuff that serves as a front for the intelligence agencies.38 

The perpetrator of the last event from Texas, for example, enlisted in the US Air Force, where he “served in logistics readiness at Holloman Air Force Base in New Mexico”.38.1 This should remind us of the Defense Logistics Agency (D.L.A), Department of Defense's combat logistics support agency, which probably supplied the urban assault vehicle for the Charlottesville hoax, as mentioned in Miles's paper on that fake event. Sutherland Springs is a community of only 600 people just 20 miles outside of San Antonio, and D.L.A's tentacles reach also that city. San Antonio is “home to one of the largest concentrations of military bases in the United States, and has become known as Military City, USA”. The defense industry there employs more than 89,000 people. Furthermore, in his  paper on the Las Vegas hoax, Miles mentioned the 7th (not 12th) Psychological Operations Group, having one of its companies based in Las Vegas. Well, its 341st Tactical Psychological Operations Company (T.P.U) is based in San Antonio; the 324th T.P.U is in Aurora, Colorado – this should remind you of the “Batman”shooting  hoax from 2012 which took place in a Cinemark movie theater.

If you are asking yourselves what this  Psychological Operations Group actually does, or originates from, you would probably be surprised to learn that it is the “successor to the United States Army Broadcasting and Visual Activity”, and that its sub units focus on “Product Development and Target Audience Analysis and face-to-face engagement with a given target audience and loudspeaker operations”. This reminds me of the Las Vegas hoax story, which is centered on a country music festival where loudspeakers play a major role. 

As a last bit of circumstantial evidence, I am adding a quote from a notice which was published on the Defense Logistics Agency's website on 10 November 2017: 

Only weeks after mass shootings at a concert in Las Vegas and at a small-town church in South Texas [Nov 5, 2017], employees of the Defense Logistics Agency should know D.L.A and other local first respondents are regularly honing their skills in responding to active shooters, as they did in a Nov. 7 exercise at the McNamara Headquarters Complex [Fort Belvoir] and at the agency’s facility in nearby Lorton. ‘Earn your Academy Award,’ the officer urged the volunteer actors. ‘Make it believable for the respondents. This is real-world to them’. 

Both Fort Belvoir and Lorton are in Virginia and are two-hour drive away from Charlottesville. 

We have come full circle here, as Miles would say. And do you remember what you read a few pages back? The killer from the Sikh temple was a former psychological operations specialist in the US Army. 

Just one last thing. Wiki says that Sutherland Springs is named after its pioneer citizen John Sutherland Jr. This reminds us of Kiefer Sutherland. You probably remember him from the TV series 24, in which he played a character named Jack Bauer, who first served in the Green Berets, then Delta Force, then he worked for the L.A.P.D, then for the CIA, and finally for the Counter Terrorist Unit and the FBI. Well, there is a reference to Jack even in the first Kingsman movie:

Pretty dog. What's his name? 

–J.B. 

As in James  Bond?

–No. 

Jason  Bourne?

–No. Jack  Bauer.

Hah, never thought about those spook characters having the same initials. Of course, all those three surnames are found in the British peerage, along with the Sutherlands. They are dukes. The Bauer reminds me of Franz Anton Beckenbauer, “a German former professional footballer and manager [...] nicknamed Der Kaiser (The Emperor) because of his elegant style, dominance and leadership on the field, and also as his first name Franz is reminiscent of the Austrian emperors”. Yeah, what a coincidence. You know what is also a coincidence? The  Beckenbauers are British peers. Here's our Franz playing for Hamburger SV: 

Recognize that central logo? British Petroleum was their  sponsor. The ‘Becken’ part of his surname reminded me of Boris Franz  Becker, the famous German tennis player. The Beckers are in the British peerage too. And can you guess who the name Franz reminded me of, besides the previously mentioned Franz Knigge of the Bavarian Illuminati? Franz Oberhouser, the villain from the last James Bond movie Spectre. Miles boldly assumed the surname Oberhouser means ‘upper house/class’, but there is also a Wiki entry about a  Josef Oberhouser, an SS Nazi commander, that is littered with spook markers and illogic.] 

[Miles: I wanted to mention the church fight scene from the first film, since my reader/writer didn't hit it (the first time). It is being touted as the greatest fight scene in the history of cinema by many people. Of course these many people are agents, but what the hey. Since it is mostly CGI and camera tricks, that assessment fails even on technical grounds, but I mention the scene for other reasons. I found it highly offensive, and I am not easily offended by stuff in movies. For instance, I watched John Wick and was not offended once. Slightly disgusted many times, yes; offended, no. Wick sucked, but Kingsman sucks much worse. It is offensive because it is such a transparent part of the continuing Theosophy project to undercut all religions and make religious people look like idiot zombies. As usual, I say that despite not being a normal religious person. I am not a Christian, Jew, Muslim, Hindu, etc. So some find it strange to see me defending organized religion. As my regular readers know, I am not defending organized religion so much as outing Intelligence projects. This church scene is part of a major and long running project by the super wealthy against average people, so it burns me for that reason alone. I remind myself that these Christian church scenes are being written, produced, directed, and acted by crypto-Jews. Remind yourself of that and you will probably read them in a different light as well. I also refer you to my recent critique of the film Spotlight, which made this war very clear. There we saw battalions of Jewish people manufacturing a major false flag against the Catholic Church, and then calling the Gentiles good Germans for trying ignore them. If that didn't burn you up, you aren't awake. I recently re-watched The Exorcist as part of ongoing research, and I saw many signs of the same thing. I now read the movie as a crude opportunity for Jewish writers, cast and crew to do lewd things to the cross, the Virgin Mary, the crucifix, and priests. Some have said the movie makes Christ look powerful, since the exorcism was ultimately successful. But I remind you the priests failed. They both died at the end, the Devil taking the soul of one of them. Christianity is very firmly blackwashed in the film, on many levels. That was the point of the book and film. 

As for Kingsman, the church fight scene was clearly an analogue, precursor/postcursor, and clue to the many mass shootings we have seen in churches in the past decade, including the highly promoted one in Charleston (with Dylann Storm Roof) and the very recent one in Sutherland Springs, Texas. Although all these events are fiction, the point of them is to blackwash Christianity. They also hope to scare you away from church, making you afraid you may be the next victim of a madman. If the governors had their way, you would only be allowed to leave the house for work and shopping. They don't want you making any social or sexual ties: they want you to have no outlets for your emotions and frustrations except shopping, drugs, and mass media. This maximizes all their profits.]

http://mileswmathis.com/kingsman.pdf