MASTERS OF DECEPTION:ZIONISM,9/11
AND THE WAR ON TERROR HOAX
BY ZANDER C.FUERZA
CHAPTER FIFTEEN
The Neocons and the Holocaust©:
Zionism’s Big Lie
Besides Al-Qaeda’s purported sponsorship of 9/11 and Saddam’s alleged “Weapons of Mass
Destruction,” the neocons were intoxicated with a third monstrous myth: the holocaust story.
Many of the most prominent Jewish neocons have acknowledged that their belief in the
holocaust story lies at the very foundation of their Zionist fanaticism and lust for war with the
perceived enemies of the Jews and Israel. Gal Beckerman, writing for the Jewish Forward, made
note of the “holocaust consciousness” that enshrouds the thinking and worldview of Jewish
neocons, writing:
“It was [Norman] Podhoretz, however, who gave neoconservatism its most explicitly
Jewish cast. The August 1968 issue of Commentary featured Emil Fackenheim’s
famous essay, “Jewish Faith and the Holocaust: A Fragment,” which included
Fackenheim’s contention that after Auschwitz, Jews had a moral responsibility to
defend Jewish interests so as not to hand Hitler a “posthumous victory.” By
February 1972, Podhoretz himself wrote a piece titled, without irony, “Is It Good
for the Jews?”
Holocaust consciousness was growing in the 1970s, as was a renewed sense of threat
to Jews and a feeling that, as Podhoretz put it, the postwar “statute of limitations”
on antisemitism had run out. Israel’s security, threatened in the Six Day War and
the Yom Kippur War — both events that gave Jews existential pause — suddenly
became a top American Jewish concern. Podhoretz came to identify more and more
with the defense of Jews, and by the 1980s, half his articles on international affairs
focused on Israel and threats to the Jewish people.” (“The Neoconservative Persuasion: Examining the Jewish roots of an intellectual movement,” The Forward, Jan. 06, 2006.)
The three prime engineers of the war in Iraq — Douglas Feith, Richard Perle and Paul
Wolfowitz — have all conceded that it is the holocaust story that constitutes the engine that
drives their calamitous policies of aggressive warfare. Speaking about what motivates his views
on foreign policy, Richard Perle said:
“For those of us who are involved in foreign and defense policy today of my
generation, the defining moment of our history was certainly the holocaust. It was
destruction, a genocide of a whole people, and it was the failure to respond in a
timely fashion to a threat that was clearly gathering. We don’t want that to happen
again. When we have the ability to stop totalitarian regimes we should do so because
when we fail to do so the results are catastrophic.” (“The War Party,” BBC)
A New York Times piece on Paul Wolfowitz noted his status as “one of Israel’s staunchest
allies in the Bush administration” and explained that his world view was,
158
“forged by family history… Brooklyn-born and raised in Ithaca, N.Y., Mr.
Wolfowitz, 58, is the son of a Cornell University mathematician who escaped Poland
after World War I. The rest of his father’s family perished in the Holocaust. ‘That
sense of what happened in Europe in World War II has shaped a lot of my views,’
he said.” (Eric Schmitt, “The Busy Life of Being a Lightning Rod for Bush,” New York Times, April 22, 2002.)
Douglas Feith furnished some autobiographical material to explain why he is such a fervent
promoter of war and death, telling journalist Jeffrey Goldberg:
“I had done a lot of reading, relative for a kid, about World War Two, and I
thought about Chamberlain a lot. Chamberlain wasn’t popular in my house. What I
was hearing from the antiwar movement, with which I had a fair amount of
sympathy . . . were thoughts about how the world works, how war is not the answer.
I mean, the idea that we could have peace no matter what anybody else in the world
does didn’t make sense to me. It’s a solipsism. When I took all these nice-sounding
ideas and compared it to my own little personal ‘Cogito, ergo sum,’ which was my
understanding that my family got wiped out by Hitler, and that all this stuff about
working things out-well, talking to Hitler to resolve the problem didn’t make any
sense to me. The kind of people who put bumper stickers on their car that declare
that ‘war is not the answer,’ are they making a serious comment? What’s the
answer to Pearl Harbor? What’s the answer to the Holocaust? The surprising thing
is not that there are so many Jews who are neocons but that there are so many who
are not.” (“A Little Learning: What Douglas Feith knew, and when he knew it.,” The New Yorker, May 9, 2005.)
Expressing a deep hatred of gentiles and a desire to exterminate anyone who gets in the way of
Jewish group interests, these three Zionist warmongers invoke nonsensical justifications in
defense of their evil policies. The argument that they seem to be making, is that since some of
their family members perished during the Second World War — along with the over 60 million
others who also died in the war — a war instigated by the Jewish elite themselves — they now
feel that they have an obligation to crush any possible ‘threat’ to Jewish world hegemony.
Neocon crime boss Michael Ledeen also acknowledged the centrality of the holocaust story to
his views. In an article entitled “The New Holocaust” (PJ Media, Dec. 22, 2010.) Ledeen writes
that he has “spent a lot of time interviewing Holocaust survivors” and goes on to propagate
the flaccid falsehood that:
“…unlike most of the Holocaust, the slaughter of contemporary Jews is not carried
out in antiseptic gas chambers, but in the streets, markets, restaurants, airports, and
skyscrapers of the modern world. These killers do not have the comforting distance
that Nazi technology placed between killers and martyrs. The jihadis think of
themselves as individual assassins, not deranged industrial managers, as did so
many of Hitler’s men.”
Bradley Smith, the founder of the Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust (CODOH),
opined that this neocon obsession with, and blind belief in, the holocaust dogma of German WMD – the myth of the gas chambers – is what lies behind their sinister policies of open-ended
aggression against the entire Arab and Muslim world, with the intention of bolstering Israeli
military and economic supremacy in the Middle East. Smith writes:
“We are left to imagine how this uninformed (I choose to trust that Wolfowitz is not
willfully ignoring revisionist work on the gas chamber fraud) view of what
happened between Germans and Jews during World War II influences how he
morally justifies the creation of a Jewish state on Muslim land in the Middle East,
the ensuing US alliance with Israel, and the war against Iraq which helps to secure
Israel as a homeland for Jews, in the short run.” (“Paul Wolfowitz: the Blind Leading the Blind,” Outlaw History Newsletter, Nov. 23, 2004.)
The official account of the ‘holocaust’ is divorced from reality on a multitude of levels. The
veracity of the claims made about ‘homicidal gas chambers’ in German concentration camps
during the Second World War has been scientifically debunked by chemists and engineers such
as Fred Leuchter, Germar Rudolf, Dr. William B. Lindsey and Walter Lüftl. The orthodox
holocaust story has been cut to pieces by rigorous analysis and research done by revisionist
scholars such as Ernst Zündel, Robert Faurisson, Arthur Butz, Mark Weber, Fredrick Töben,
Carlo Mattogno, Jürgen Graf, Bradley Smith, David Cole and many others (whose works can be
read for free on line at VHO.org). Raul Hilberg, a leading holocaust dogmatist, was obliged to
confess on the witness stand at the Toronto kangaroo court of the first Ernst Zündel trial in 1985
that there is neither documentary evidence nor any scientific proof of the holocaust. (“No scientific proof Jews exterminated: witness,” The Montreal Gazette, Jan. 18, 1985.) The French
Emperor Napoleon wisely said that authorized history is merely a made-up fable agreed upon by
the victors of any battle or war. Thus the professional deceivers calling themselves
neoconservatives are not only upholding old lies that were used to justify the Zionist seizure of
Arab land, but are continually concocting new lies with which to sucker Westerners into fighting
more wars of aggression to secure the Zionist dream.
At the root of the holocaust deception lies the Zionist desire to conquer what was Arab-held
Palestine and form a Jewish ‘homeland’ in its place. This nefarious Zionist conspiracy was
articulated in plain English by a prominent American-Jewish rabbi named Stephen S. Wise, an
influential adviser to numerous U.S.
Presidents, including Woodrow
Wilson and Franklin D. Roosevelt. In
1900 — 14 years before World War
One and 39 years before World War
Two — rabbi Wise spoke of
“6,000,000 living, bleeding,
suffering arguments in favor of
Zionism,” unveiling the kabbalistic
‘6,000,000’ figure in the context of a
Zionist public relations effort to use
perceived persecution of Jews as a
way of garnering world sympathy for
the creation of a Jewish state.(“ZIONISTS’ MASS MEETING: Rabbi Wise’s Address,” New York Times, June 11, 1900.)
The grand exaggerations and fabrications of the holocaust story are indeed a critical component
of this whole narrative, but the intricacies of the holocaust fraud is a subject for another book.
Considering the vastness of the subject, I will simply mention a few examples of the previous
attempts by Jews to submerge unsuspecting non-Jewish populations underneath a tidal wave of
Jewish persecution stories, invoking the kabbalistic ‘six million’ figure with an obsessive,
religious passion. This was usually done as an attempt to divert the world’s attention away from
Jewish-inflicted atrocities, like the heinous murders that were being perpetrated by Jewish
Bolsheviks in Russia and elsewhere in Europe. It was also intended to elicit public sympathy and
support for Jewish political causes, primarily Zionism. Here are a few examples:
1) In 1902, the tenth edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica references “six million
Jews” of Romania and Russia being “systematically degraded.”
5) In 1911, at the tenth Zionist Congress in Basle, Switzerland, the co-founder of the
World Zionist Organization Max Nordau made a startling prediction that “6,000,000
Jews” would soon be annihilated by European governments. (Hecht, Ben. Perfidy. New York: Messner, 1961. p. 254.)
8) On the 31st of October 1919, shortly after World War One had ended, the Governor of
New York at the time, Martin H. Glynn, published an article in the American Hebrew
161
Magazine entitled “The Crucifixion of Jews Must Stop” in which he speaks of the
imminent destruction of “six million Jewish men and women,” calling it a “holocaust
of human life.”
11) In 1936, Zionist kingpin Chaim Weizmann, in an effort to lobby the British
government to permit mass Jewish immigration to Palestine, expressed the view that
6,000,000 Jews had “neither hope nor future” in Europe. (“Before The Royal Commission,” Jewish Western Bulletin, Dec. 11, 1936 / “The Jewish Case: Dr. Weizmann Before Royal Commission,” The London Times, Nov. 26, 1936.)
12) Also in 1936, a desperate appeal for the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine
appeared in the New York Times. The article spoke of the “sufferings of millions of
persecuted Jews” in “the European holocaust.” Zionists yearned for England to
“throw open the gates of Palestine and let in the victimized and persecuted Jews
escaping from the European holocaust,” asserting that “the restoration of the land of
Israel to the children of Israel is the guiding star in this great struggle for a better
world.” (“Americans Appeal For Jewish Refuge,” New York Times, May 31, 1936.)
16) In November and December of 1944, with a full six months left of the war still to be
fought, articles began appearing in Jewish publications already alleging that exactly
6,000,000 Jews had been killed. “Six Million Jews Listed Slaughtered” was the
heading of an article published in the November 28, 1944, edition of the Pittsburgh Post On the same day, the Palestine Post ran the heading “Six Millions Murdered”. These
stories were all based on the preposterous claims of Ilya Ehrenburg, a Jewish-Soviet communist propagandist who, in March of 1945, several months before fighting would
cease, again prematurely announced that “the world now knows that Germany has
killed six million Jews.” (Soviet War News, Mar. 15, 1945.)
That is just a small sample of Jewish persecution propaganda, alleging an imminent “holocaust
of six million Jews,” emanating from Zionist media sources. What it shows is that Zionist Jews
have been promoting the kabbalistic fable of “six million Jews on the brink of extermination” as
a foregone conclusion bound to happen for many years before, during and after World War One.
This is documented more thoroughly by Don Heddesheimer in his book “The First Holocaust: Jewish Fundraising Campaigns With Holocaust Claims During and After World War One”. Even
as far as the official account is concerned, the figure of ‘six million’ Jewish deaths in their
claimed ‘holocaust’ during World War Two was laid to rest long ago. Historian Mark Weber has
noted that the “Auschwitz story has changed drastically over the years.” In 1990, the
Auschwitz state museum officially revised the alleged death toll there from the absurd figure of 4
million — which was uncritically accepted as ‘fact’ for decades — to 1 or 1.5 million. Other
prominent historians have reduced the total amount of deaths in Auschwitz to as low as 500,000,
whereas the revisionists calculate that somewhere between 150,000 and 350,000 Jews and nonJews
died in Auschwitz from all causes, mainly disease and starvation. (Mark Weber, “Auschwitz: Myths and Facts,” Institute for Historical Review, Sept. 2009.) Majdanek, a
German concentration camp in Poland, was claimed to be the resting place of 1.5 million
murdered Jews until, in recent years, the official authorities there drastically reduced the figure to
79,000, a bare fraction of its former magnitude. Revisionist historians have arrived at an even
lower number. (Jürgen Graf, “A Revisionist Analysis of Majdanek Concentration Camp,” Revisionist History) The 1963 edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica speaks of “2,000,000
people, mostly Jews” who were allegedly done to death by the Germans in Mauthausen, a
concentration camp in Austria. Official sources were forced to concede that this figure is yet
another grotesque exaggeration, now placing the Jewish death toll at that camp somewhere
around 14,000. (“Mauthausen,” United States Holocaust Memorial Museum Website)
In a rare display of honesty, the Israeli author Tom Segev revealed that the oft-repeated figure of
five million non-Jewish victims of Hitler and National Socialism is a tissue of lies. In his book
“Simon Wiesenthal: The Life and Legends,” Segev explained that the Jewish con-artist Simon
Wiesenthal, the infamous ‘Nazi Hunter,’ conjured this figure out of thin air as a marketing ploy
to elicit non-Jewish interest in holocaust lore — it has no basis in reality. (Deborah E. Lipstadt, “Simon Wiesenthal and the Ethics of History,” Jewish Review of Books) When taken together,
these official reductions of ‘holocaust’ death figures — including the five million gentile victims
invented by Wiesenthal — amounts to over 11,000,000 completely made up victims of the
Germans! On top of that, there are millions of Jews who claim to be “survivors” of Hitler’s
alleged ‘death camps.’ on page 81 of his book “The Holocaust Industry,” Jewish scholar
Norman Finkelstein recalled a question that his mother used to ask: “If everyone who claims to
be a [holocaust] survivor actually is one, then who did Hitler kill?” Evidently, Hitler didn’t
kill very many Jews at all because his policy all along was deportation, not extermination.
Yet why, despite these official admissions and astonishing discoveries that have made a
gargantuan dent in the sacrosanct “six million dead Jews” figure, are people still being taught in
school that this many Jews perished in the Second World War? Why do the media, like trained
163
parrots, endlessly repeat this number? A clue
as to why this is was disclosed by the
‘holocaust’ pope Raul Hilberg. Speaking
about the Jewish fixation on the ‘six million’
number he said, “call it religious if you
like.” (“The war on truth,” The Guardian, Mar. 12, 2001.) Indeed, the holocaust story
itself is not a matter of history but a matter
of religion — a made-up fairy tale designed
to pacify the ‘goyim’ and pave the way for
the creation of Israel and Jewish world
dominion. Ian J. Kagedan, a top official of
the Jewish-Masonic group B’nai B’rith, let
slip the Jewish supremacist agenda
underpinning the widespread promotion of
the holocaust myth. In 1991, Kagedan said
that memorializing the holocaust story “is
central to the new world order” and that achieving their “quest of a “new world order”
depends on our learning the Holocaust’s lessons.” (Toronto Star, Nov. 26, 1991.) This “New
World Order” of global Jewish domination was promised to the leaders of American Jewry by
the dedicated Zionist servant Arthur Greenwood, a member of the British War Cabinet during
the Second World War. In a vocal pledge of servitude to World Jewry, he proclaimed that upon
Hitler’s defeat in the war Jews everywhere would be given an opportunity to “make a
distinctive and constructive contribution in the rebuilding of the world.” (“New World Order Pledged To Jews,” New York Times, Oct. 8, 1940.)
This analysis would not be complete without mentioning the lies that fomented the first Gulf
War and their holocaust connection. Most people are unaware of the circumstances that
facilitated the first Gulf War between the United States and Iraq. When Saddam Hussein moved
his military forces into Kuwait on August 2, 1990, the Zionist Lobby was itching to use this
action as an excuse to bomb Iraq and remove Saddam Hussein from power. The American
public, however, was not eager to go to war with Saddam and did not feel obliged to get involved
in inter-Arab squabbles in the Middle East. To counter the anti-war sentiment, a scheming
Jewish-Zionist official in the U.S. government orchestrated a colossal propaganda hoax with
which to demonize Iraq and drive the U.S. into war against Saddam and his forces. A short time
after Saddam’s occupation of Kuwait, Tom Lantos, the late Jewish democratic Senator from
California, created a phony ‘human rights’ organization called the “Congressional Human Rights
Foundation”. The group was a front for the Jewish-run public relations firm Hill & Knowlton,
which shared the same office building as Lantos’ organization. In October of 1991, Lantos
organized a totally scripted conference called the “Congressional Human Rights Caucas” in
which Kuwaiti actors posing as ‘downtrodden victims’ of Saddam’s aggression against Kuwait
were paid to give false testimony. (“To Sell A War,” CBC News: The Fifth Estate) The star of
this Zionist-produced show was a young 15-year-old Kuwaiti girl who appeared at the hearing
using the assumed name “Nayirah.” She gave a tearful testimony about how she witnessed
atrocities committed by Iraqi soldiers in Kuwait with her own eyes, stating:
“While I was there, I saw the Iraqi soldiers come into the hospital with guns, and go
into the room where . . . babies were in incubators. They took the babies out of the
incubators, took the incubators, and left the babies on the cold floor to die.” (Ibid.)
Author John R. MacArthur observed that, “Of all the accusations made against the dictator
[Saddam Hussein] none had more impact on American public opinion than the one about
Iraqi soldiers removing 312 babies from their incubators and leaving them to die on the
cold hospital floors of Kuwait City.” (“How PR Sold the War in the Persian Gulf,” PR Watch) It was later revealed that “Nayirah” was a member of the Kuwaiti Royal Family, the daughter of
Saud Nasir al-Sabah, Kuwait’s Ambassador to the U.S. She spoke perfect American English
without an accent, having lived in the U.S. her whole life. She had been given her lines and
trained in the art of acting by the public relations firm Hill & Knowlton. (Ibid.) Her story was a
complete fabrication, a lie from A to Z. Nayirah’s false testimony was trumpeted around the
world by mainstream media outlets and phony ‘human rights’ groups, and even at the UN by
lying Kuwaiti officials seeking Western support in their struggle against Iraq. This fabricated
story was the single most critical piece of propaganda that turned the tides of American public
and government opinion in favor of war against Saddam. President George H. W. Bush and his
top Jewish adviser, the notorious war criminal Henry Kissinger, used it as the casus belli for
their policy of aggression in the Gulf.
During the hearing, Lantos and some of his paid stooges incessantly made comparisons between
Saddam Hussein and Adolf Hitler, and Iraq and Nazi Germany. Lantos, a Jew of Hungarian
origin, claims to be one of the countless millions of ‘holocaust survivors,’ so he is well versed in
the art of lying for a political cause. At the heart of his agenda to instigate an American attack
against Iraq was certainly his commitment to the cause of Zionism, seeking the destruction of
one of Israel’s main adversaries in the Middle East, Iraq and Saddam Hussein. Lantos, who
thankfully is now deceased, was one of the featured stars of Steven Spielberg’s egregious
holocaust hoax documentary “The Last Days”. The utter fraudulence of Spielberg’s film and the
testimony of the interviewees featured in it was exposed in a counter-documentary called “The Last Days of the Big Lie
To top off all of this disgraceful deception on the part of Jewish supremacists and their evil
minions, there is another piece of
information worth drawing
attention to. In a stunning example
of the Jewish propensity to spread
malicious lies about their enemies,
a ridiculous display of anti-Iraqi
propaganda was featured in the
New York-based Jewish Press, then
calling itself “the largest
independent Anglo-Jewish weekly
newspaper,” which had on its title
page on February 21, 1991:
“IRAQIS HAVE GAS
CHAMBERS FOR ALL JEWS”.
165
Moreover, the front cover announcement of volume 12, number 1 (spring 1991), of Response, a
periodical published by the Jewish Simon Wiesenthal Center in Los Angeles, was: “GERMANS
PRODUCE ZYKLON B IN IRAQ (Iraq’s German-made gas chamber)”. Nobody took these
claims seriously, and they were patently untrue, but it goes to show that Jews are not very
inventive when it comes to war propaganda, simply repeating lame anti-German canards from
the Second World War.
The lesson to be learned from all of this is that Jews love to tell atrocity tales involving young
children as the victims. This type of propaganda is very effective at inflaming public opinion
because nobody, other than Zionist Jews, likes to see innocent children suffer and die. While
Jewish propagandists promulgate phony tales of Germans and Iraqis slaughtering children, the
Israeli army actually guns down little Palestinian children in the streets of Gaza and the West
Bank on a daily basis, having deliberately murdered tens of thousands of innocent children since
the earliest days of the Zionist takeover of Palestine led by the Irgun and Stern gangs. In
“Operation Cast Lead,” Israel’s barbaric and lethal siege against the people of Gaza in 2008/09,
about one quarter of the nearly 1400 Palestinian casualties were children; of the 5300 injured,
1606 (“Operation Cast Lead, 27 Dec. ’08 to 18 Jan. ’09,” B’tselem, Jan. 01, 2011.)were children. Journalist Stephen Lendman reported that “since the September 2000 Second
Intifada, Israeli forces killed 1179 children, including 865 in Gaza as part of a decades-long
policy of collectively punishing millions of Palestinians in the Occupied Territories, mostly
civilian men, women, and children.” (“Israeli War Crimes Against Children During Operation Cast Lead,” Global Research, June 12, 2009.) The Jewish lust for the blood of innocent children
was perfectly epitomized in an unnerving interview featuring Madeleine Albright, the Secretary
of State under Bill Clinton. In an interview with CBS 60 Minutes, the Zionist Jew Albright was
asked if the inhuman economic sanctions imposed on Iraq by the U.S. government after the first
Gulf War, which caused the deaths of over 500,000 Iraqi children, was “worth the price.” With a
sick look in her eyes, Albright coldly responded: “I think this is a very hard choice, but we
think the price was worth it.” (“Punishing Saddam,” CBS News 60 Minutes, May 12, 1996.) These facts reveal who the real child-killers are in this world.
Why are Jews such prolific peddlers of lies and falsehoods? The Jewish religion actually
advocates lying to and deceiving non-Jews. In his scholarly study “The Truth About the
Talmud,” revisionist historian Michael Hoffman noted that in Baba Kamma 113a of the
Babylonian Talmud it condones the use of lies and subterfuges to “circumvent a Gentile.”
Rabbi Joseph Telushkin plainly
admitted that “Jewish tradition is
tolerant of those who bend the
truth… Jewish law is remarkably
tolerant of ‘white lies.’” (“White Lies,” My Jewish Learning Website) Each year, religious Jews undergo a
ritual in which they pledge
themselves to be recklessly
dishonest, relinquishing all future
oaths and promises. This ritual,
called the “Kol Nidre,” is considered the holiest of Jewish prayers. Critics, however, have called the prayer a license to lie and cheat. (Rev. Ted Pike, “Kol Nidre: Judaism’s License To Lie,” Truth Tellers, Nov. 17, 2008.)On the
eve of the ‘Day of Atonement,’ Jews recite these words:
“All vows, obligations, oaths, and anathemas, whether called ‘ḳonam,’ ‘ḳonas,’ or
by any other name, which we may vow, or swear, or pledge, or whereby we may be
bound, from this Day of Atonement until the next (whose happy coming we await),
we do repent. May they be deemed absolved, forgiven, annulled, and void, and made
of no effect; they shall not bind us nor have power over us. The vows shall not be
reckoned vows; the obligations shall not be obligatory; nor the oaths be oaths.” (“KOL NIDRE,” Jewish Encyclopedia, 1906.)
The communist doctrine — the spawn of Jewish supremacist ideologues — also championed the
use of lies and subterfuge to accomplish political objectives. The communist idol and first Soviet
dictator Vladimir Lenin, a monstrous Jewish criminal who founded the Cheka, the genocidal
secret police apparatus of the Soviet regime, once said that “a lie told often enough becomes
the truth.” (M. Kumar. Dictionary of Quotations. APH Publishing: New Delhi, India, 2008. p. 134) Promises, Lenin surmised, “are like pie-crusts—made to be broken.” (LIFE Magazine, Dec. 23, 1957.) Extolling the virtues of deception, Lenin instructed his underlings to “utilize all
possible cunning and illegal methods, deny and conceal the truth.” (“The present stage of Soviet global expansion: sources, goals and prospects,” U.S. Army Institute for Advanced Russian and East European Studies, p. 29.) Now compare the maniacal teachings of Judaism and
its birth-child Bolshevism with that of National Socialism. The ideology of Adolf Hitler and his
National Socialist German Workers’ Party (NSDAP) is exactly the opposite of Judaism and
Bolshevism, preaching honor, integrity, loyalty, pride and truth. . (Gottfried Feder, “Programme of the Party of Hitler, the NSDAP and its General Conceptions,” Zentralverlag der NSDAP, 1932.)National Socialism is the most vilified political philosophy on earth due to its staunch
opposition to Jewish domination. Despite the vicious lies and hatred surrounding Hitler and his
movement, the true facts of the time paint quite a drastically different picture of the man and the
philosophy he espoused. Unlike Bolshevism and its father, Judaism, National Socialism
practiced a rather benevolent strategy when it came to propaganda. The NSDAP’s “Handbook On Propaganda” itself states on page 5:
“… we are not propagandizing lies and untruths as England did during the War,
but rather we are preaching freedom and prosperity, socialism and patriotism to
our confused people. Our struggle and our propaganda have one supreme principle:
to take truth and only truth as the foundation of our propaganda.”
The National Socialist propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels, dubbed a “big liar” by Jewish
Media, always held that the best propaganda is that which does no more than serve the truth. In
1935, at a Nuremberg rally, Goebbels righteously explained that, “Good propaganda does not
need to lie … It has no reason to fear the truth. … A propaganda that lies proves that it has
a bad cause. It cannot be successful in the long run.”(“Goebbels at Nuremberg — 1934,” Calvin German Propaganda Archive) The late Jacques Ellul, a French professor of history and
sociology at the University of Bordeaux and a former anti-German partisan during World War
Two, conceded that Goebbels “never stopped battling for propaganda to be as accurate as possible.” (Garth S. Jowett and Victoria O’Donnell. Readings in Propaganda and Persuasion: New and Classic Essays. SAGE, 2006, p. 48, note 47) Hitler, in his autobiography ‘Mein
Kampf,’ repeated a phrase coined by the German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer that the Jews
are the ‘Great Master of Lies,’ explaining that “from time immemorial … the Jews have
known better than any others how falsehood and calumny can be exploited.” (Mein Kampf, Murphy Translation, p. 134)Hitler harshly condemned the use of “Big Lies” in political
propaganda and identified the Jews and their invention Marxism as the source of this technique.
(Ibid.) Hitler stressed that those who are too foolish or dimwitted to recognize the deceitful
nature of the Jew will “never be able to lend a hand in helping truth to prevail.” (Ibid.)
Hitler’s profound wisdom came through in his extraordinary speeches and writings. He was
vastly knowledgeable and possessed expert reasoning abilities. He was a tremendously skillful
logical thinker and had the uncanny gift of foresight. Writing about the Jewish lust for a
‘homeland’ in Palestine, Hitler sniffed out the insincerity of this Zionist endeavor, suggesting
that the Jews did not actually want a state of their own for the purpose of living there. The real
aim of Zionism, Hitler theorized, was to establish a “central organization for their
international world swindle, endowed with its own sovereign rights and removed from the
intervention of other states: a haven for convicted scoundrels and a university for budding
crooks.” (Mein Kampf, Chapter XI: Nation and Race) In much the same way that Osama bin
Laden described the desire of Jewish supremacists to control and subjugate their foes, Hitler
once stated that the modus operandi of International Jewry is to “exploit nations and make
them the slaves of their international guild of criminals.” (Adolf Hitler, and Max Domarus. The Essential Hitler: Speeches and Commentary. Bolchazy-Carducci Publishers, Illinois. 2007. pp. 406-412.)
Undoubtedly, the Jewish propaganda of the past is propelling the Jewish propaganda of the
present. In essence, these atrocious lies are designed to drive a wedge between the Christian
world and the Muslim world, railroading gentiles into a third world war in which the only real
victor will be World Jewry and their fabricated nation-state of Israel. Most importantly, the
religious creed of these neoconservative warmongers is the holocaust fable – it is the backbone
of neocon thinking. This dangerous convergence of historical untruths, and the blind acceptance
of these falsehoods by the majority of the masses of people, is leading the entire planet toward
perpetual hostilities and bloodshed.
CHAPTER SIXTEEN
Was American Intelligence
Also Complicit in 9/11?
It is certainly true that American intelligence agencies, particularly the CIA and the FBI at the
highest levels, were complicit in the staging of 9/11 and the subsequent cover-up, and are thus
also culpable for this crime. It can easily be shown, however, that American intelligence
agencies are under the direct influence of Organized Jewry and serve their Zionist-Globalist
agenda.
Take, for instance, the provocative and sycophantic statements made by George Tenet, the
director of the CIA from July 1997 to July 2004. In 2008, at an event hosted by the Anti-Defamation
League, Tenet proclaimed: “I knew that on 9/11 we had all become Israelis.” (“Former CIA Director Reaffirms United States’ “Strategic Relationship” With Israel In Fight Against Terrorism,” ADL Official Website, Oct. 07, 2008.) This pro-Zionist bootlicker further
suggested that the ‘special relationship’ between Israel and America “will be unbroken and will
always be bound together.” (Ibid.) A.D.L National Director Abe Foxman praised Tenet as a
“committed friend to the State of Israel, who encouraged exchanges between the CIA and
Israeli intelligence services.” (Ibid.) Tenet’s dealings with the Jewish lobby date back to his
early years as chief of the agency. In 1999, allegations of “Antisemitism” surfaced at the CIA
and George Tenet launched a full investigation into the matter at the urging of the A.D.L. In a
letter of fawning servitude to the A.D.L, Tenet announced that he “will not tolerate antisemitism
… at the CIA,” assuring his master Abe Foxman that “there is no place for antiSemitism
at the CIA.” (“CIA Director Tells ADL He Will Not Tolerate Anti-Semitism at Intelligence Agency,” A.D.L Official Website, April 14, 1999.) For his loyal service to the cause
of Zionism and global Jewish hegemony, Mr. Tenet received the A.D.L’s highest honor,
“America’s Democratic Legacy Award,” as well as the William and Naomi Gorowitz Institute
Service Award in 2008. (“Former CIA Director George Tenet Presented With A.D.L’S Highest Honor,” A.D.L Official Website, Feb. 11, 2005.)
The FBI, like the CIA, have been kissing cousins with America’s domestic Jewish lobby for
decades. At the A.D.L’s National Commission Meeting in 2005, FBI director Robert Mueller,
who officially assumed that position on September 4, 2001, laid out the cozy relationship
between the two organizations, stating:
“The training and education you [the ADL] provide for the FBI and for law
enforcement have never been more relevant. This especially includes the classes at
the Holocaust Museum. At a time when law enforcement must be aggressive in
stopping terror these classes provide powerful lessons on why we must always
protect civil rights and uphold the rule of law.” (“ADL and Law Enforcement: Fighting Terror before 9/11 and Beyond,” ADL Official Website, Aug. 24, 2011.)
The FBI forces its new trainees to take a mandatory tour of the holocaust memorial museum in
Washington, D.C. where they are subjected to a grotesque Zionist brainwashing campaign. The
FBI’s own website boasts about how “before becoming special agents, students from the FBI
Training Academy tour the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum,” also
169
acknowledging that “more than 60,000 law enforcement professionals—including about
10,000 new FBI agents and analysts—have gone through the [Holocaust] program.” (“A Different Kind of Training: What New Agents Learn from the Holocaust,” FBI Official Website, Mar. 30, 2010.) New applicants to the FBI are intensively conditioned to sympathize with the
Jews and to loathe the enemies of the Jews before they are even considered for employment with
the agency. After touring the Zionist hate theme park known as the “U.S. Holocaust Memorial
Museum,” these aspiring FBI officers emerge with the perception that the historical enemies of
the Jews are the ‘bad guys’ who don’t deserve the same civil rights as the rest of society. It is no
coincidence that since 9/11 the FBI has been trampling all over the civil rights of American/Muslims
with impunity. The two groups that presently threaten the Jewish World Order are
Muslims and White nationalists, both of whom are constant targets for FBI sting operations and
all kinds of other subversive shenanigans — all at the behest of the A.D.L. This is part and parcel
of the FBI’s dedication to upholding Jewish supremacist rule in America.
On its website the A.D.L boasts of massive involvement in the training of American law
enforcement, admitting that their influence with the police and intelligence community increased
significantly as a direct result of 9/11. They write:
“The Anti-Defamation League has worked closely with law enforcement for decades
to carry out our mission of protecting both the Jewish people and all others from
extremism, hatred and injustice. But since the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the scale of our
work with law enforcement has increased significantly and the greatest demand for
A.D.L expertise has been in the area of training for law enforcement. As the foremost
non-governmental authority on domestic terrorism, extremism, organized hate
groups and hate crimes, A.D.L has been the leading non-government organization
training police. In 2010 alone, we trained more than 10,500 law enforcement officers
from all over the country.” (“ADL and Law Enforcement: Fighting Terror before 9/11 and Beyond,” ADL Official Website, Aug. 24, 2011.)
The Jewish journalist Max Blumenthal detailed what he calls the ‘Israelification’ of American
law enforcement and domestic security in an article entitled “From Occupation to “Occupy”: The Israelification of American Domestic Security”(Information Clearing House, Dec. 05, 2011.).
Exposing the Israeli takeover and subjugation of American society, Blumenthal revealed:
“The process of Israelification began in the immediate wake of 9/11, when national
panic led federal and municipal law enforcement officials to beseech Israeli security
honchos for advice and training. America’s Israel lobby exploited the climate of
hysteria, providing thousands of top cops with all-expenses paid trips to Israel and
stateside training sessions with Israeli military and intelligence officials. By now,
police chiefs of major American cities who have not been on junkets to Israel are the
exception.
“Israel is the Harvard of antiterrorism,” said former US Capitol Police Chief Terrance W.
Gainer, who now serves as the US Senate Sergeant-at-Arms. Cathy Lanier, the Chief of
the Washington DC Metropolitan Police, remarked, “No experience in my life has had
more of an impact on doing my job than going to Israel.” “One would say it is the front line,” Barnett Jones, the police chief of Ann Arbor, Michigan, said of Israel. “We’re in a
global war.”
Karen Greenberg, the director of Fordham School of Law’s Center on National
Security and a leading expert on terror and civil liberties, said the Israeli influence
on American law enforcement is so extensive it has bled into street-level police
conduct. “After 9/11 we reached out to the Israelis on many fronts and one of those
fronts was torture,” Greenberg told me. “The training in Iraq and Afghanistan on
torture was Israeli training. There’s been a huge downside to taking our cue from the
Israelis and now we’re going to spread that into the fabric of everyday American life? It’s
counter-terrorism creep. And it’s exactly what you could have predicted would have
happened.”
The Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (J.I.N.S.A) is at the heart of AmericanIsraeli
law enforcement collaboration. J.I.N.S.A is a Jerusalem and Washington DC-based
think tank known for stridently neoconservative policy positions on Israel’s policy
towards the Palestinians and its brinkmanship with Iran. The group’s board of directors
boasts a Who’s Who of neocon ideologues. Two former J.I.N.S.A advisors who have also
consulted for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Douglas Feith and Richard
Perle, went on to serve in the Department of Defense under President George W. Bush,
playing influential roles in the push to invade and occupy Iraq.
Through its Law Enforcement Education Program (LEEP), J.I.N.S.A claims to have
arranged Israeli-led training sessions for over 9000 American law enforcement
officials at the federal, state and municipal level. “The Israelis changed the way we do
business regarding homeland security in New Jersey,” Richard Fuentes, the NJ State
Police Superintendent, said after attending a 2004 J.I.N.S.A-sponsored Israel trip and a
subsequent J.I.N.S.A conference alongside 435 other law enforcement officers.
During a 2004 LEEP trip, J.I.N.S.A brought 14 senior American law enforcement
officials to Israel to receive instruction from their counterparts. The Americans
were trained in “how to secure large venues, such as shopping malls, sporting events
and concerts,” JINSA’s website reported. Escorted by Brigadier General Simon
Perry, an Israeli police attaché and former Mossad official, the group toured the
Israeli separation wall, now a mandatory stop for American cops on junkets to
Israel. “American officials learned about the mindset of a suicide bomber and how
to spot trouble signs,” according to J.I.N.S.A. And they were schooled in Israeli killing
methods. “Although the police are typically told to aim for the chest when shooting
because it is the largest target, the Israelis are teaching [American] officers to aim
for a suspect’s head so as not to detonate any explosives that might be strapped to
his torso,” the New York Times reported. [...]
Besides J.I.N.S.A, the Anti-Defamation League (A.D.L) has positioned itself as an important
liaison between American police forces and the Israeli security-intelligence apparatus.
Though the A.D.L promotes itself as a Jewish civil rights group, it has provoked
controversy by publishing a blacklist of organizations supporting Palestinian rights, and for condemning a proposal to construct an Islamic community center in downtown New
York, several blocks from Ground Zero, on the basis that some opponents of the project
were entitled to “positions that others would characterize as irrational or bigoted.”
Through the A.D.L’s Advanced Training School course on Extremist and Terrorist
Threats, over 700 law enforcement personnel from 220 federal and local agencies
including the FBI and CIA have been trained by Israeli police and intelligence
commanders. This year, the A.D.L brought 15 high-level American police officials to
Israel for instruction from the country’s security apparatus. According to the A.D.L,
over 115 federal, state and local law enforcement executives have undergone A.D.L organized
training sessions in Israel since the program began in 2003. “I can honestly
say that the training offered by A.D.L is by far the most useful and current training course
I have ever attended,” Deputy Commissioner Thomas Wright of the Philadelphia Police
Department commented after completing an A.D.L program this year. The A.D.L’s
relationship with the Washington DC Police Department is so cozy its members are
invited to accompany DC cops on “ride along” patrols.
The A.D.L claims to have trained over 45,000 American law enforcement officials
through its Law Enforcement and Society program, which “draws on the history of
the Holocaust to provide law enforcement professionals with an increased
understanding of…their role as protectors of the Constitution,” the group’s website
stated. All new FBI agents and intelligence analysts are required to attend the A.D.L
program, which is incorporated into three FBI training programs. According to
official FBI recruitment material, ‘all new special agents must visit the US
Holocaust Memorial Museum to see firsthand what can happen when law
enforcement fails to protect individuals.’”
Commenting on the insidious influence of the ADL, the Reverend Ted Pike opined: “Since its
founding in 1913, the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith has enjoyed almost mythical
powers of intimidation against public figures who might criticize it.” (“A Year of Blunders By ADL,” National Prayer Network)Congressman John R. Rarrick wrote in the Congressional
Record: “…the world’s largest spy network, the A.D.L – the Anti-Defamation League – is
either too powerful to be curbed by Congress or too well embedded to be mentioned (by
Congress) or to come under scrutiny.” (Ibid.) On December 6th, 1971, Rarrick read into the
Congressional Record Senator Jack B. Tenney’s prophetic warning concerning the A.D.L’s
dangerously subversive schemes:
“The CIA and FBI are tinker toys compared to the A.D.L. We are beginning to
understand something of the magnitude of the A.D.L’s operations. We are beginning
to appreciate the vast spy network sprawling over the nation and throughout the
whole world. Our imagination is staggered by its apparent control of the avenues of
communication. Their secret agents spy upon American citizens. Extensive files and
dossiers are compiled on those with whom they disagree. Through their
multitudinous controls of the media of communication, they are capable of
destroying reputations and silencing all rebuttal.” (“’The CIA and FBI are Tinker Toys Compared to the A.D.L’ — Sen. Jack B. Tenney,” David Duke Official Website, Aug. 21, 2007.)
Remarking on Tenney’s courageous and truthful observations, the brave anti-Zionist activist
David Duke made this insightful analysis:
“During the 1940s Senator Jack Tenney was the heroic head of the Un-American
Activities Committee for the State of California, his patriotic work made him one of
the most knowledgeable people in the world concerning the Zionist-Communist
network. Although Senator Tenney’s “Tinker Toy” comparison may sound a bit
over the top, it is actually probably close to the mark when one considers that the
B’nai B’rith has some 200,000 Jewish extremist supporters, that they are backed by
the State of Israel, that the global Zionist media covers for them and that they are
able to make use of the extensive Jewish sayanim intelligence gathering network to
further their aims.” (Ibid.)
The indications are far too numerous to ignore: American intelligence and law enforcement
agencies are under the control and direction of Israel and Organized Jewry. The close
collaboration between U.S. intelligence and U.S. law enforcement with Israel and Organized
Jewish groups reveals a one-sided relationship — that of a slave-owner and his servant. This
disturbing reality unveils a pattern of treason on the part of the U.S. intelligence-police
community, whose actions solely benefit a foreign power and a domestic power bloc who are
loyal to that foreign power. With this in mind, it should not come as a shock to see the CIA and
FBI participate in the attacks of 9/11 and the subsequent cover-up of the truth, working in
tandem with their Israeli and American-Jewish overlords.
next
Jewish Occupation: Zionism Rules America
FAIR USE NOTICE
THIS SITE CONTAINS COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL THE USE OF WHICH HAS NOT ALWAYS BEEN SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED BY THE COPYRIGHT OWNER. AS A JOURNALIST, I AM MAKING SUCH MATERIAL AVAILABLE IN MY EFFORTS TO ADVANCE UNDERSTANDING OF ARTISTIC, CULTURAL, HISTORIC, RELIGIOUS AND POLITICAL ISSUES. I BELIEVE THIS CONSTITUTES A 'FAIR USE' OF ANY SUCH COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL AS PROVIDED FOR IN SECTION 107 OF THE US COPYRIGHT LAW.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107, THE MATERIAL ON THIS SITE IS DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PROFIT TO THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED A PRIOR INTEREST IN RECEIVING THE INCLUDED INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL CAN BE REMOVED ON THE REQUEST OF THE OWNER.
