By Jim Stone
UPDATE: THE SIRENS AT HICKAM AIR FORCE BASE, PEARL HARBOR, AND OTHER BASES WENT OFF, AND THEY ARE NOT HOOKED UP TO THE EAS. THIS RULES OUT THE FINGER BUMBLING FOOL. BUSTED!!!
Hmm, let me guess - They were observing the "anomaly" the whistle blower (below) mentioned that they were already aware of from the day before, had systems locked, activated the anti missile defense system practically instantly, shot down the launched missiles within a minute, killed the sub, AND THEN, 38 minutes later, gave the all clear. How about that for a back story? Obviously it can't be confirmed, but it sure beats the "bumbling fool" on alert button ludicrosy.
Hawaii update
The new line from the MSM is that the police knew it was a false alarm five minutes after the alert was given. I CALL BUNK, because if that was true, how on earth did the EAS take 33 additional minutes after that to give the all clear? Would they not be the first to know? The police should have gotten the all clear from the EAS. If they did not, who gave them the all clear? It's not like all the cops have a secret line to military command post X. I CALL BUNK, it is a cover story for something much bigger.
Remember a few years ago when there was a confirmed missile launch off the coast of California
that was also subsequently scrubbed and white washed? It was proven that it was launched by a Chinese Navy Jin class ballistic missile nuclear submarine, and it got scrubbed by the Pentagon and debunked by Snopes. Yet it was so freaking obvious what it was that no one, even hunch backed emma believed the Pentagon. What happened in California is a SOLID, ROCK SOLID PRECEDENT for there to have been a real missile launch and shoot down off of Hawaii, with subsequent media white wash. You can't trust a damn thing the media says, they are all a bunch of scamming traitors.
The real back story to the Chinese missile incident is that it was a warning shot to the U.S., to prove China could circumvent detection by the U.S. The missile was fired 30 miles off the coast, and sent on a trajectory that caused it to land 400 miles to the west, in the Pacific. The U.S. claims territorial waters 250 miles out, and China totally violated that but what could the Pentagon do? Encourage them to launch another missile the other way?
UPDATE: I AM NOW CONFIDENT MY REPORT ABOUT ISRAEL LAUNCHING A FAILED NUKE ATTACK ON HAWAII IS TRUE.
"Confident" is the best I can do when it can't actually be proven. But the back channels of the internet have filled up with massive numbers of trolls that are onto this story like maggots on a rotting dog, trolls that are saying the most stupid things, like "I wonder what nation owned the sub, Paraguay? (as if they are serious) and other absolutely ridiculous crap.
FACT: There is only ONE nuclear nation that has submarines that fit the description that is not Russia or the U.S. and that is ISRAEL.
The banality of the trollage points ONE DIRECTION: ISRAEL.
Naked banal we have seen it everywhere countless times predictable stupid ISRAELI TROLLAGE.
"Now we have to scream "Nazi" sniff, and force Germany to cough us up another sub . . . . . sniff.
I was a little bit skeptical of this until I saw the nature of the trollage. Now I am like - "Oh my God!"
14 January 2018
Yesterday's nuclear launch on Hawaii real? Possibly.
The following is thus far urban myth, but people should be aware of it because it could be true, and is certainly plausible. If a submarine was destroyed, it is overwhelmingly probable for it to have been Israeli.
I have a way to know if this story is true. Israel should have THREE dolphin 2 submarines in 2018. If the years go on and they can only show two, one of them just bit the dust. The Dolphin 2 submarines have air independent propulsion, which gives them a range and endurance second only to a nuclear submarine. One of these could have made it to Hawaii, especially with clandestine surface support.
The possible submarines are: Dolphin, Leviathan, Tekumah, Tanin, Rahav and Dakar (not yet commissioned) with the last 3 having a very large air independent range. People ought to be able to confirm one missing by keeping an extended (years long) eye on Israeli naval bases.
Once again, the above cannot be confirmed true, but it is intriguing to say the least. Keep an eye on Israel's subs.
Here's an intersting post on this topic. I'd have to say I agree.
I live on maui. The "oops" Hawaii ballistic missile alert just doesn't add up. Think about your job. Imagine the biggest fuck up that you could possibly commit. A fuck up that doesn't damage your workplace or harm anyone that you work with, or outside of work, but a MASSIVE fuck up none the less. Something that would get you immediately fired and or put in prison even.
What would it take for you to fuck up that bad at your job?? Would it even be possible? Is it something so easily done that would have such catastrophic effects? Is it something so simple as hitting a wrong button and sending an alert to a million plus people? I'm sorry but there are no "buttons" that are set up to do that. I just don't see this as a big mistake, there's something more. I'm not sure what but I know it wasn't just a simple fucking mistake.
A subsequent response:
Head dude was asked if he was there when it all went down. He said no, the system is set up so that no one needs to be there. Kinda contradicted his button pushing story.
BTW, I'm on Kauai - Aloha!
My comment: The cover story really is rock stupid. As if the emergency alert system has a custom "button" for a nuke attack, that automatically sends out a canned message. And that is exactly why the purported whistleblower testimony about a submarine nuke launch is so plausible, it is FAR MORE plausible than an idiotic "oops" story.
Twitter, Google, and others steal your data (including E-mail and private messages) AFTER you leave their sites
This video from Project Veritas shows conversations with Twitter programmers, where they brag about stealing your data even if you don't have a Twitter account. It is well worth watching.
Google is doing something a lot worse. I have noticed that if I hit google even once, my bandwidth usage triples even if I only do one search and never hit Google for the rest of the day. Since I do everything over a cell modem it is very noticeable when bandwidth starts vanishing at an accelerated pace. Additionally, in the past when I hit google (a couple years ago) simply hitting the page only ate about 30K. Now simply hitting the page eats 5 or more megs. There's something seriously fishy with Google.
In the video linked above, they brag about reading everyone's private messages. it does not take a genius programmer to do that. If I set up "private messaging", E-mail, or anything of that sort up on this web site for people to use, I'd be able to access everything anyone sent simply because I have the rights to the platform at an administrator level. That's the nature of the beast, you can't set up anything anywhere without giving the people who actually own the service access to everything.
So these "programmers" who are acting all special and self aggrandized in the video above really are just snot nosed kids with nothing absolutely any other web site administrator would have, except for the fact that they have absolutely no morals and peruse people's stuff simply because they automatically can, not because they are any sort of grand genius.
Absolutely anyone who runs any web site can load whatever crap they want onto your system to track you and rape you at will. Some people have more morals than others. This site loads only what you actually see, it does not load a pile of crap in the background and keep sending everything you type and view back to it hours after you leave. Twitter, Google, Facebook and others should be shut down for doing exactly that. There's a final line where it becomes a violation no matter what the contract says, and those three are far over that line.
I will repeat: It takes absolutely zero skill to do what these pathetic snot nosed programmers are doing. They are acting all arrogant and special like they are evil geniuses when all they are is pathetic losers with absolutely zero morals. Absolutely anyone with a web server and an ability to make it work can do what they are doing. VERY FEW HAVE SUCH A LACK OF MORALITY THAT THEY ACTUALLY DO IT. Twitter should burn.
I am well aware of the wikileaks e-mail that "proves" Clinton foundation paid for Chelsea's wedding
There is a major web site that is a little too loose with the facts for my liking that is very popular in the alt media. They sometimes release good looking stories that do not end up here because after fact checking they only look good, they don't pan out.
The latest: Wikileaks mail proves Bill used clinton foundation "resources" to pay for Chelseas wedding.
Ok. So if you have seen this out there, you know what the site is. lots of people just gobble their stuff up and it is too often something Snopes can rightfully debunk. Here's the e-mail they say proves it:
An investigation into something is not proof it happened until the investigation releases the results and proves it. That was not the case when this mail was sent or even now. Therefore the story is bunk.
Now, I have no doubt Bill paid for Chelsea's wedding with clinton foundation funds, as well as 500 cigars and trips to the red zone. But that is not proven here and because this mail proves nothing it is EXACTLY what the liberal scamsters want.
The point I am making with this is that if you don't see it on this site, it does not mean I missed it.
The reason why this site gets problems more than any other is because if it hits this front page you can bank on it being for real, and when I do miss it is clearly corrected later. There has to be a reason why I have so many problems with attacks on communications and financing. The elite don't care about sites that inject "40 percent disinfo" (the site the above came from is a LOT better than that, but a little too loose for my liking) . But if you actually try to hit zero percent disinfo, and then focus on things that make the corrupt elites itch, you're gonna have problems.
According to ABC News Fire and Fury is selling well in the world's sh*tholes
Kim Jong is laughing it up, and the book is a top seller in North Korea. Fiction be damned. Evidently "friends in low places" did not get the news the book is an admitted forged fake, where not a single cabinet official was interviewed and even the preface has this admission:
"Many of the accounts of what has happened in the Trump White House are in conflict with one another; many, in Trumpian fashion, are baldly untrue. These conflicts, and that looseness with the truth, if not with reality itself, are an elemental thread of the book."
But fantasy will work for Kim Jong I guess.
James Woods to Clinton: You robbed Haiti like a peg legged pirate
This is a hilarious twitter exchange, which unlike the ones below it, is not parody.
No comments:
Post a Comment