PART 1: THE PALESTINE PLOT

The "Palestine" Plot 

BY B. JENSEN

" It is therefore, I think, quite possible to state the real as distinct from the proximate objectives of the present war. 

" They are : 

"(1) The establishment of the International Police State on the Russian Model, beginning with Great Britain. ' Can we finally rid Europe of barriers of caste and creed and prejudice ?... our new civilisation must be built through a world at war. But our new civilisation will be built just the same.' (MR. ANTHONY EDEN, broadcasting to America, September 11, 1939). This contemplates the complete abolition of civil rights. 

"(2) The Restoration of the Gold Standard and the Debt System. 

"(3) The elimination of Great Britain in the cultural sense, and the substitution of Jewish-American ideals. 

"(4) The establishment of the Zionist State in Palestine as a geographical centre of World Control, with New York as the centre of World Financial Control." 

C. H. DOUGLAS in " Whose Service is 

Perfect Freedom," published in 

"The Social Crediter," Sept. 23, 1939.

Concerning the " Historical" Connection of the Jews with Palestine. " (The Mandate) is a reprehensible document drawn up, not by the Mandate's Commission . . . but by the Zionists themselves in collusion with the British Government in the interests of the National Home. It was never debated in Parliament, but was issued under an Order in Council. This is the true origin of the trouble in Palestine. A fictitious right has been invented, namely, that ' the historic connection ' of the Jews with Palestine gives them a special status in the land. This supposed ' historic connection ' is none other than an ancient imposture." 

Frances E. Newton: 

"The Mandate for Palestine," 1946. 

" .... not a single inscription has been found in Palestine which can be identified with the Hebrew Kingdom (p. 48). Jerusalem has failed to produce any trace of David or Solomon, any tablet, any inscription or even foundation memorial. Thus there is lacking in their case that documentary evidence which is to be found in the cases of all the other races of Western Asia of any note (p. 49). The Greeks make no mention of the Jews in early days, although such a maritime race would surely have come in contact with them, had Palestine been their home. Divine Homer knows nothing of them . . ." 

H. D. Daunt: 

" The Centre of Ancient 

 Civilisation," London, 1926. 

In July, 1946, Dr. George Kheirallah, who publishes the "Arab World," New York, stated before the Standing Committee on External Affairs of the Canadian House of Commons that "the Jewish merchants from Stamboul went into the Tartar country, the Caspian district, and Judaized the Khazar Tartars. The result is that when you see thousands and thousands of Polish, Russian and Romanian Jews they have neither the Semitic wisdom nor the blood. They are Tartars, and the Arabs to-day are constantly confronted with this Tartar invasion." 

One remembers Disraeli's references to 'the Jews' as a splendidly organised Caucasian race, and there come to mind, also, various descriptions of the peculiar mixture of semi-Asiatic races which inhabited the lands which gave birth to 'Stalin,' the Georgian-Caucasian, and 'Lenin,' in whose veins flowed a large admixture of Mongol blood, as well as of many of the lesser lights of the Soviet-Talmudic scheme of things. 

Dr. Kheirallah's statement that ancient Semitic lands are at the moment being invaded by non-Semitic Tartar-Asiatics who have no more valid claim to ' Zion ' than has e.g., Mr. Emanuel Shinwell to Wentworth Woodhouse, receives support from an article entitled ' Zionists Misleading World with Untruths for Palestine Conquest' which appeared in the " New York Herald Tribune," on January 14, 1947, and which is now being distributed freely and widely by the League for Peace with Justice in Palestine, New York. 

Coming from the Metropolis of World Jewry, and having the support of organisations of Americans of the Christian, Mohammedan and Jewish faiths, all apparently violently anti-Zionist, this document is deserving of critical attention. I am informed that it has received no attention, critical or otherwise, from the official press of this country. 

According to the text of this document, " The Zionists claim that persons of the Jewish Faith in eastern Europe (Polish, Lithuanian, Galician, Ukrainian, Russian and Rumanian) have a legitimate right to be 'repatriated' to Palestine, connoting their right to return to the country of their origin. The basis for this Zionist claim is contradicted and disapproved by the world's foremost historians, ethnologists, anthropologists, philologists and cartographers. The works of these notable Jewish and non-Jewish authorities are to be found in the leading public libraries and educational institutions of higher learning. These authorities agree that persons of the Jewish Faith in eastern Europe are the descendants largely of a non-semitic Turkish-Finnish race which came into Europe from Asia about the 1st century A.D. by a land route north of the Caspian Sea. These people are known in history as Khazars. The Khazars had always been a pagan people. They settled in eastern Europe and there established the Khazar kingdom. By continuous and successful conquests for which the Khazars became famous in history, their kingdom increased in size until by the 8th century A.D. it occupied the greater portion of eastern Europe located west of the Urals and north of the Black Sea, and extending far westwards into Europe. The Khazar nation was converted to Judaism at about the end of the 7th century A.D. The Khazar king in (ca.) 692 selected Judaism rather than either the Christian or Muslim religions which were striving to convert the Khazar king and the Khazar nation to Christianity or to Mohammedanism. After the conversion of the Khazars to Judaism, only a Jewish king could occupy the Khazar throne. Conversion of the Khazars to Judaism was very successful. Judaism became the state religion. Synagogues and schools for teaching Judaism to the Khazars and peoples conquered by them were built throughout the kingdom. Rabbis to officiate in synagogues, and teachers for the schools, were imported from Spain. These non-Semitic Turkish-Finnish people from Asia, now converted to Judaism, formed the Khazar kingdom which dominated eastern Europe: this great and powerful Jewish kingdom at the peak of its power was collecting tribute from no less than twenty-five conquered peoples. Conquest was their vocation. 

This great and powerful Jewish kingdom flourished for almost five hundred years without a setback. Even the neighbouring mighty Byzantine and Persian empires feared the Khazars, and eagerly sought military alliances with them. Towards the end of the 10th century A.D., the Khazars were defeated in a war with the Russians (Varangians) who came down upon them from out of the north. For the first time in their history this Jewish kingdom was defeated and the Khazars were conquered. This conquest of the Khazars was completed in the middle of the 13th century A.D. The Khazar population and former Khazar territory were thus incorporated into the expanded Russian state. The Khazar kingdom disappears at this time from the history of the world. The conquest of the Khazar kingdom by the Russians accounts for the presence in southern Russia of the large and concentrated population of the Jewish faith. During the next few centuries, large parts of this concentrated Jewish population were included in the newly formed Polish, Lithuanian, Galician, Rumanian and other states which through conquests were carved out of the former greater Russia. These new states were in their turn reconquered by Russia, and these large Jewish populations were reunited again as Russians. From the 13th century A.D. to the outbreak of World War II. the Eastern European area of Southern Russia underwent very little ethnic change and continued to include the descendants of the former Khazar Jewish kingdom." 

Ever since that day, Russia has been invading and occupying neighbouring territory: "Conquest was their vocation." 

We may recall Disraeli's remark about that ' mysterious Russian diplomacy ' which was controlled by his co-racialists. Disraeli was in the habit of spending his Sunday nights with the London Rothschilds, who managed the financial interests in England of the ' Czarist' administration. The London Rothschilds were ' Liberals,' and their financial interests were expertly handled in ' reactionary ' Germany by Baron von Bleichroeder of Berlin, and the Warburgs of Hamburg, and in ' reactionary ' Russia by Baron Ginzburg of St. Petersburg, and the Weinsteins of Odessa. 

The influence exercised over the 'Liberal' press of the world by the Rothschild-Bleichroeder-Warburg combination was decisive. From the middle of the 19th century till 1917, when Communists financed by them seized power in Petrograd, the 'Liberal' press of the world was consistently and solidly anti-Russian. Russia was held up to the world as that Oriental Despotism which, under overt Jewish control, it has since become. Russia is, or was until recently, described by the 'Lab-Liberal' press of the world as a workers' paradise. 

The Pro-Sovietism of the 'Internationalist' Press and Parties was, from 1917 to 1933, combined with an equally ardent admiration for German 'Republican Democracy,' an admiration which the advent of 'Hitler' changed into a feeling of vehement 'anti-Nazism,' which, in its turn—as Germany was emptied of her 'Jews' and the war against  'Hitler' drew near—broadened into that kind of anti-German frenzy which we associate with the name of Lord Vansittart. (In 1945, Lord Vansittart discovered, and Mr. Churchill re-discovered, the 'Russian' danger which antedates the 'Nazi' peril by at least 25 years. Hitler was a keen student of Trotsky's works and admitted he had learnt a lot from the Jewish 'Bolshevists' At the time of writing, the Big British Dailies are discovering, with an air of surprise, that 'Stalin' is beginning 'to copy the methods' of 'Hitler.' The British dailies are 'fed' their news by the International News Agencies, many of which are controlled by Jews.) 

Since the end of the Jewish war against 'German' 'Fascism,' the newspaper press of the world has in growing measure directed its powers of invective against the British Empire, now in the process of being liquidated under the guidance of Communist-Labour-Liberal Governments, often openly directed by 'Jews.' 

The quarrel of "World Jewry"—that marvellously organised community of Common (i.e., collectivized) Beings—with the British administration is not, as in the case of 'Czarist' Russia and 'Hitlerite' Germany, that a despotic Government persecutes their fellow 'religionists' (who,as a matter of common observation, are in open control of the key positions of the economic life of this country) but that streams of their 'persecuted' co-Talmudists are not allowed freely to converge on, and settle in, a tiny corner of the Empire in which the Rothschild Dynasty has been economically and otherwise interested since the middle of the 19th century when the first modern Jewish colonists settled, under Red-shield guidance, in the wine-growing parts of Palestine. 

It has been pointed out by Professor Bentwich, former Attorney General of Palestine, Professor of International Relations of the Hebrew University, Mount Scopus, and prominent 'Labour' politician, that the Balfour Declaration to Lord Rothschild and the 'Russian' Revolution took place in the same month, and we may perhaps be justified in considering them as a sort of twin experiment. We know that the Communist and the Zionist movements were financed from the same source. We know that many of the 'officers' of the Tartar-Jewish revolutions; in Russia, Hungary, Spain, etc., found ready employment in the 'agricultural' development of Palestine. We know that the Jewish Agency for Palestine—the mysterious semi-autonomous body which the Jews in Palestine regard as their real government and with which the leading families in Israel, the Samuels, Isaacs, Warburgs, Rothschilds and Schiff's are intimately connected—is left an entirely free hand in the selection of the type of 'labourer' deemed necessary for the continued success of the National Home experiment. 

The Tartar-Jewish zealots who, apparently under perpetual hypnotic suggestion, are everlastingly singing the Hatikvah, their National Anthem in a posture of Prussian rigidity, while being carted from truck to ship and from ship to truck at the orders of the invisible Zionist High Command, offer the most frightening example of what can be done with beings subjected to years of enforced collectivism. The Zionist 'democracy' has 'decided' to return to the 'land of their fathers.' The Zionist High Command encourages that belief with every means in its power. The lot of the Zionist 'democrat' on reaching his Promised Land is far from easy, often tragic. His essential function is to be a number, and with his often equally tragic fellows he adds up, or is beginning to add up, to the desired total. An American writer has a word for it: the 'refugees' are merely being used as the political football of the leading Zionist Jews of the world. The "New York Herald Tribune" article sums the situation up as follows: 

"Since 1916, Zionists have proceeded on the theory that their plan for creating an independent Jewish state in Palestine was the only certain method by which Zionists could acquire complete control and outright ownership of the proven Five Trillion Dollar ($5,000,000,000,000) chemical and mineral wealth of the Dead Sea. A Jewish state possessing this fabulous wealth would by virtue of its financial power soon become a nation with greater international importance than any nation in the history of the world. The real driving force behind the feverish Zionist "give me Palestine or give me nothing" struggle now going on is their hope of resurrecting in Palestine their former eastern European Jewish kingdom (Khazar). Zionists are using the horrible Hitler massacre not for the purpose of accelerating the rescue of their co-religionists from eastern Europe, as 'professional' Zionists would have the world believe as they plead for contributions, but perverting this humanitarian task to get the Five Trillion Dollar ($5,000,000,000,000) juicy Palestine 'prize package.' 

Twenty years before the arrival on the scene of Adolph Hitler and his Nazi murderers, Zionists were then using less impressive alibis to justify their 'high-jacking' of the Five Trillion Dollar ($5,000,000,000,000) chemical and mineral wealth of the Dead Sea, which always has rightfully belonged to the native Palestinians. The official report of the British Crown Agents for the Colonies prepared for the Government of Palestine, entitled 'Production of Minerals from the Waters of the Dead Sea' states on page 2 that there are forty-two billion metric tons of potassium chloride, magnesium bromide, magnesium chloride, calcium chloride and sodium chloride, 'and also a supply of potash which may be considered inexhaustible,' of a total value of about Five Trillion Dollars ($5,000,000,000,000) at today's prices. Zionists will some day be held responsible for the political pollution and financial filth by which they have obtained temporary possession of the Dead Sea, and are now removing from it wrongfully through the operation of Palestine Potash, Ltd., a corporate 'front' for the secret Zionist 'high-command,' the natural resources of the land which belong to the people who live there. Ironically, Zionists are using the profits from this operation to finance the conquest of the country from these natives. When published, the facts will shock the world and rock the reputations of many names long held to be above suspicion." 

The article then proceeds to show how the operations ordered by the Zionist High Command are leading to unexpected developments in the Near East. The Arab peoples are becoming increasingly bitter against (not the British, as it was hoped?) but the Americans, as they are coming to realize that it is 'New York' far more than 'London' which dictates the 'British' policy in Palestine. A Cairo paper, " Al Misry," is quoted as advocating a complete boycott of American merchandise and American 'culture' in the shape of books, periodicals, etc. There are many indications that New York, having for long with complete impunity sowed the wind, is now at last beginning to reap the whirlwind. 

PART I 

Militant Zionism 

versus 

Gentile Civilisation. 

"The attacks on the Talmud have not been made by the enemies of the Jews alone. Large numbers of Jews themselves repudiate it, denying that they are Talmud Jews, or that they have any sympathy with it. Yet there are only the few Karaits in Russia and Austria, and the still fewer Samaritans in Palestine, who are really not Talmud Jews. Radical and Reform, Conservative and Orthodox, not only find their exact counterparts in the Talmud, but also follow in many important particulars the practices instituted through the Talmud .... The modern Jew is the product of the Talmud . . . ." 

New Edition of the "Babylonian Talmud,"

 published by the Boston Talmud Society, 1918, pp. XI.-XII

"A heretic Gentile you may kill outright with your own hands." 

Talmud, Abodah Zara, 4b.

" A short visit to the U.S.A. is sufficient to make it clear to anyone that the Jewish masses there have reached a higher degree of Jewish consciousness than ever before . . . . from the political point of view, America is the stronghold of Zionism today .... in New York, the average citizen sometimes gets the impression that the whole Jewish community is engaged in a passionate, aggressive campaign of anti-British propaganda and of support for the Palestine terrorists .... the average Jew .... is emotionally pro-terrorist . . . ." 

Robert Weltsch: " Currents in American Jewry," printed in 

" The Jewish Chronicle," August 29th, 1947. 

"Every time you blow up a British arsenal, or wreck a British jail, or send a British railroad train sky high, or rob a British bank or let go with your guns and bombs at the British betrayers and invaders of your homeland, the Jews in America make a little holiday in their hearts." 

Ben Hecht, in "P.M.," New York, 1947. 

"The awareness Mr. Hecht has aroused for his own ends must be used to unmask and indict the real criminals, the shadowy figures we glimpse behind both sides of the war, fomenting the struggle for their own ends; and they must be branded with that responsibility. Then we shall be in a position to dissociate Great Britain from their machinations . . . Could we do this, we should see far off, but nevertheless before us, a bearable life for each one of us, bountiful and unencumbered." 

"The Social Crediter," August 9th, 1947. 

For God "so loved the world" that he made it possible for each of us to lead a "bountiful and unencumbered life." And the Devil, following his old custom of turning God's world and ways upside down, has launched against us, in the same half-century, three distinct yet allied campaigns of organised hatred. As a result of his evil work, half of our Christian Europe which was built on Faith (Credit), Hope (Personal Initiative) and Charity (Individual Generosity) lies smouldering in ashes. 

Let us be specific. "Ye are of Your Father the Devil" said Jesus of Nazareth to "the Jews" of his own time. They were city dwellers and moneylenders, then as now, and their slum-world was, then as now, built on false and anti-natural (ungodly) foundations. For thousands of years the Father of Lies has raised his children, "the Jews," on the inverted and Satanic principles of the Talmud. The Jews had "compulsory education" centuries before the Gentiles (under Jewish supervision) introduced this mind destroying institution. (The result among the Gentiles of a few generations of compulsory education is a rapidly falling level of intelligence and a growing inability of the adult population to distinguish  between facts and propaganda. "The education we have so far succeeded in giving to the bulk of our citizens has produced a generation of mental slatterns."—Dorothy Sayers in "The Mind of the Maker"). 

In their Talmud Torahs, as the synagogal schools were called, the Jewish boy seems to acquire those techniques of double-dealing and deceit which we are coming to associate with professional "Communists." 

This early initiation into the mysteries of "the Law" made certain that however far the individual Jew was subsequently removed from the physical prison-world of the ghetto, he would forever remain a prisoner of his own slum mentality. It is an interesting reflection that Mr. Attlee, the "Labour" Prime Minister whose governmental team has done more in a shorter time than any preceding administration to reduce the social life of Great Britain to the level of the East-European ghetto, and who began his political career as Mayor of the East End ghetto-borough of Stepney, is the Patron of the Commercial Road 'Talmud Torah,' London. Not even the most enthusiastic admirer of the "Labour" Government will be able to claim that the City State that Messrs. Attlee-Shinwell-Silkin-Strachey are building in England's formerly green and pleasant land is founded on the three Christian cornerstones of Faith, Hope and Charity. 

The Talmud makes Jesus of Nazareth the subject of several obscene stories, and on him was focussed the hatred which the Talmud Jew was taught to entertain towards non-Jews generally. It accords with this attitude that the gayest of "religious" festivals among the Jews should be the Purim, which celebrates the murder of thousands of Gentiles at the instigation of a Jewish Court concubine, Esther. 

A modern "American" Talmudist, Rabbi Leon Spitz ("American Hebrew," March 1st, 1946), recommends us to re-read the Book of Esther as offering a realistic solution of the problem of anti-Semitism. "We must fill our jails with anti-Semitic gangsters, we must fill our insane asylums with anti-Semitic lunatics . . . . we must harass and prosecute our Jew baiters to the extreme limits of the law, etc., etc." The conscious instilling of feelings of hatred (which became part and parcel of the training of the British army after the accession of the Churchill-"Labour" Coalition in 1940) has been the outstanding feature of Jewish "education" all during the Dispersion. 

The Jew has the policy of his philosophy. That there is nothing theoretical about his inherited anti-Gentilism has been proved on each occasion when he openly has taken over the reins of power. The followers of Trotsky-Bronstein (Russia), of Bela Kun-Cohen (Hungary, Spain) and of Kurt Eisnerlsraelovitch (Bavaria) proved themselves as true sons of the Talmudic Covenant ("A Heretic Gentile you may kill outright with your own hands;" Abodah, 4b, etc.) as were their orthodox protectors, the " International " pillars of Synagogue, Lodge and Finance.  

"LIBERAL" JEWRY 

VERSUS 

" CZARIST" PERSECUTION: 

Circa: 1880—1917. 

It is well-known that the constant stream of anti-Russian articles which appeared in the "Liberal" press during the decades preceding the first World War were written by the "Liberal" Jews of the Western Dispersion. 

Goldwyn Smith, Professor of Modern History at Oxford, wrote in the "Nineteenth Century," October, 1881: 

"When I was last in England we were on the brink of war with Russia, which would have involved the whole Empire .... the Jewish interest throughout Europe, with the Jewish Press of Vienna as its chief organ, was doing its utmost to push us in." 

As a result of Jewry's first military war against Russia in 1904-1905, in which the Japanese were financed by international loans raised by Jacob Schiff (New York), co-operating with Sir Ernest Cassel (England), and the Warburgs (Hamburg), a Parliament, or Duma, containing several Jews ("Socialists") and many Masons ("Liberals") was established in the capital of Russia. That was a beginning, but Mr. Schiff was ambitious, and his goal was indicated in the final letter he wrote to Count Witte, the Czar's emissary to the "Peace" negotiations held at Portsmouth, U.S.A., in 1905: 

"Can it be expected that the influence of the American Jew upon public opinion will be exerted to the advantage of the country which systematically degraded his brethren-in-race .... if the Government now being formed should not succeed in assuring safety and equal opportunity throughout the Empire to the Jewish population, then indeed the time will have come for the Jews in Russia to quit their inhospitable fatherland. While the problem with which the civilised world will then be faced will be an enormous one, it will be solved, and you who are not only a far-seeing statesman but also a great economic student know best that the fate of Russia and its doom will then be sealed."—(Cyrus Adler: "Jacob Schiff, His Life and Letters.") 

The world is becoming acquainted with the various methods employed by the Elders of Israel towards shortening the intervals between military wars. Many of the fathers of the present-day Palestinian Terrorists were enthusiastic Zionists who in the Ghettos of Russo-Poland underwent much the same sort of training as their sons today in Palestine, and they were financed from the same transatlantic source. 

"The subsidies granted to the Nihilists at this period (1905-1914. — Ed.) by Jacob Schiff were no longer acts of isolated generosity. A veritable Russian Terrorist organisation had been set up in the U.S.A. at his expense, charged to assassinate Ministers, governors, heads of police, etc............." 

(Francois Coty, "Figaro," February 20th, 1932.) 

In a very informative work on life in the Russo-Polish Ghetto, "The Polish Jew," written in 1906, Miss B. Baskerville observes (pp. 117-8): 

"Social-Zionism aims at converting the Zionists to Socialism before they go to Palestine, in order to facilitate the establishment of a Socialist government when their dreams have been realised and they have arrived in the Land of Promise. In the meantime they do their best to overthrow those European governments which do not attain to their political standard . . . . their program which is full of Socialistic ideas .... includes the organisation of strikes, acts of terror, and, the organisers being very young, acts of folly as well . . ." 

Jewry's second military war against Russia (officially known as the first World War) saw the disappearance of Imperial Russia and native Russian culture, and the emergence of 90 percent Tartar-Jewish administration in Petrograd. In the same month of November, 1917, the British government, headed by David Lloyd George, former solicitor to the Zionist movement, offered its services to Lord Rothschild in the establishment of a Jewish "National Home" in Palestine. Jacob Schiff explained in a letter to a friend that the opening of the Jewish Ghettos of Russia deprived World Jewry of the sort of "spiritual centre" which they ever needed for strengthening the "beautiful ideas of Judaism." There is consequently the closest possible connection between the "Soviet" experiment in Russia, and the Jewish "home-building" in Palestine. 

The majority of the Tartar-Jews of the Russo-Polish Ghettos spoke, and still speak, Yiddish, which structurally is a German dialect. In Germany was born the prophet of Socialism, Karl Mordechai-Marx, of Talmudic-Rabbinical lineage. From Germany there emigrated to the Western world a long series of Jewish writers and journalists who took up key positions in the editorial chairs of Western Europe, while guiding the "progressive" movements via "Liberalism" towards that State-socialism of which Imperial Germany was the classical example. Imperial Germany, which boasted the highest percentage of child suicides in the world, was the spiritual fatherland of intellectual Jews the world over. 

1. 

The bulk of them sided (like Jacob Schiff, of New York) with the Central Powers, at least during the early part of the 1914 war, when the Zionist headquarters was still in Berlin, and Germany appeared invincible. One cannot help wondering how many of the ex-German Jewish intellectuals in the Allied camp intoned in private that "German" song of hatred against England which the Russo-Polish Jew, Lissauer, had composed to "stiffen German morale." 

One of the most voluble and ardent admirers of "Kaiserism" was Herr Emil Ludwig, whose real name is Cohen. Like Herr Walther Rathenau, the pillar of Imperial Germany who became the Foreign Secretary of the Weimar Republic, Herr Ludwig found no difficulty in exchanging the Monarchy for the Republic. Between the wars, Herr Ludwig-Cohen achieved an international reputation as a biographer and glorifier of the Strong Men of History. There are several ways of preparing the advent of the Messiah. 

"LIBERAL" PRO-SOVIET JEWRY 

VERSUS 

"HITLERITE" TYRANNY. 

Circa: 1933—1945. 

Germany remained with Mr. Ludwig, as with the majority of the Talmudic brotherhood, "a place in the sun" till 1933, when Hitler (SchickelgruberRothschild) came forward to save Germany, and Roosevelt (Redfield) was elected to save America. In London, Mr. Blumenfeld (Flowerfield), Chairman of the " Daily Express," indicated that whatever country was going to be saved, Germany was damned: "Judaea Declares War Again Against Germany" was the caption splashed across his paper. 

In the following year, Mr. Ludwig, by this time a virulent "anti-Nazi," wrote in "Les Annales": "Hitler will have no war, but he will be forced to it, not this year but next." He hastened to publish a book advocating the formation of a Grand Alliance, led by the U.S.A., whose role it would be "to bully and threaten" Germany. In America, Mr. Roosevelt's financial secretary, Mr. Henry Morgenthau, who was one of the architects of the Bretton Woods Gold Standard World Dictatorship, and whose scheme for Vanquished Germany is characterised by prominent American journalists as truly Satanic in purpose, and who, furthermore, is prominently connected with the Zionist financial support for the Jewish Terror-Police "'experiment" in Palestine, declared in the Hearst Press (1934) "that war in Europe in 1934 was inevitable." 

In the same year, Mr. Herbert Morrison, the Chairman of the London County Council (a position now occupied by Lady Nathan) spoke at a function in aid of the Jewish Representative Council for Boycott of German Goods and Services maintaining that "it was the duty of all British citizens who loved their freedom and liberty to boycott German goods and Services." At a somewhat later date, the Jewish Professor A. Kulischer underlines this message in a "call to the democratic press the world over." He demanded "a complete blockade of trade .... and retaliation towards every German man, woman and child. Our fight against Germany must be carried to the limit of what is possible. Israel has been attacked. Let us therefore, defend Israel." Speaking at Ipswich on October 10th, 1935, Sir Stafford Cripps said: " If war comes, as come it may, that war has to be used by the workers in this country to undermine the whole system." 

In 1936, Mr. Morrison exclaimed in the House of Commons: 

".... I have seen these Jewish agricultural settlements in Palestine. They are one of the most wonderful moral demonstrations of the human race in the whole of the civilised world. I come back with a humble feeling that I should like to give up this game of House of Commons politics and join them in the clean, healthy life that they are living. When I think of these splendid young people, happily working in a co-operative and communal manner for the building up of a National Home, subject to murders and shootings, I feel indignant  about it, as if there is some crude and bloody butting into one of the finest moral efforts in the history of Mankind." (Mr. Morrison, however, did not yield to these humble promptings but persevered in the game of 'Conservative-Labour' battledore-and-shuttlecock and lived to be appointed the Chief Administrator, in 1940, of that pleasant little 'Labour-Conservative' scheme known as 18b under which many British citizens, who 'loved their freedom' as least as much as Mr. Morrison, were incarcerated for years without charge or trial. In his excellent " From Admiral to Cabin Boy," Sir Barry Domvile has conclusively proved that the inspiration of this typical ' Soviet' institution was entirely Jewish.) 

In 1937, the third and present Lord Rothschild* was asked ("The Daily Express," April 28th) where he would live when the lease of the Rothschild Piccadilly home fell in. He replied: "Nowhere probably; I just don't know. Not till after the war anyway." Mr. Israel Moses Sieff's famous dictum about the impossibility of making "Britain" embark on large-scale planning without a war, or the threat of it, dates from the same period. 
* In the "Sunday Express" of June 22nd, 1947, the statement was made that when war came, Lord Rothschild "joined the Security Branch and was active in carrying out the Government's interment policy." 15s
On September 13th, 1939, a Dutch-Jewish paper "Centralblaad voor Israeliten" wrote that Jews in every part of the world were "determined to bring the war of annihilation against Germany to its final end." On February 10th, 1940, Scholem Asch, the Jewish author, stated in "Nouvelles Litteraires": "Even if we Jews are not bodily with you in the trenches, we are nevertheless morally with you. This is our war, and you are fighting it for all of us." On February 26th, of the same year, Rabbi M. L. Perlzweig, head of the British section of the World Jewish Congress, told a Canadian audience that "The World Jewish Congress has been at war with Germany for seven years." At a meeting organised by the United Jewish Committee to aid Soviet Russia (Grosvenor House, November, 1942) Mr. Beverley Nichols said that he thought that "when Hitler had said that this was a Jewish war, he was saying something which was largely true . . . ." 

In February, 1945, a leading article of the "Jewish Chronicle" spoke of the "anti-semitism" without which this war would probably not have come about. Two years after the "cessation" of the Jews' War against Hitler, we find in every country of Europe (except, perhaps, in Scandinavia) an "anti-Semitic" problem of the most acute kind. Mr. R. Crossman, M.P., found in his investigation as a member of the Anglo-American Committee on Palestine that in the 'Soviet'-controlled countries immediately behind the Iron Curtain only three careers are open to the Jews: 

"If he (the Jew) is educated he can join the Communist Party. Thereby he gets a job, but he knows that by so doing he is the cause of anti-Semitism. How often in the past have the Jews been accused of organizing Bolshevism? His second possibility is to go into the Black Market. There is plenty of money to be made there . . But if he chooses this career he knows he is being a cause of anti-Semitism. The third possibility is Zionism." 

" Palestine Mission," Hamilton, London, 1947, p. 98. 

The Secret Police appear to continue to exercise a peculiar fascination for the Jews: 

"Some of them (the Polish Jews) had joined the Communist Party and a fair proportion of these had Government jobs, particularly in the Secret Police. Four were in the Cabinet .... we gathered that in Hungary and Roumania, as in Poland, a considerable number of educated Jews had joined the Communist Party and obtained jobs in the Civil Service or the Secret Police." 

The Gentile reaction to the virtual Jewish, monopoly of the various administrations is what we should expect; hardly a day passes without one or more of the Tartar-Jewish administrations of Soviet Eastern Europe being approached by deputations of local and foreign Jews who invariably receive assurance that the local "government" will do everything in its power to prevent further outbreaks of "anti-semitism." —(vide issues of the "Jewish Chronicle" during the past year.) 

"PROGRESSIVE"PRO-

SOVIET-ZIONIST JEWRY 

VERSUS 

"BRITISH" OPPRESSION. 

Circa: 1917-194—? 

The ideological seeds of the Third World War against Christendom were sown long before the second one was properly launched. The liaison work between Moscow and Jerusalem has been carried out right through rebellions, revolutions and wars. From the time of the Rothschild Declaration of November 2nd, 1917, till the present day there has been a steady stream of Russo-Polish Tartar-Jewish ' immigrants' making their way from Soviet-land to Palestine. The assistance given during these fateful years by British politicians of all parties has been considerable, but none have gone so far in their protestation of loyalty to the Zionist Cause as the leaders of British 'Labour.' In their pamphlet "A Palestine Munich" (Gollancz, London, 1946) Messrs. Crossman and Foot assert that in the matter of the Jewish Home in Palestine the British Labour Party 

"has always adopted a single consistent line. Individually and collectively, the members of the [present 'Labour' ] government are pledged to assist in the development of the National Home." 

Mr. Crossman elaborates this statement as follows: 

("Palestine Mission," p. 61)  

"As long ago as 1917, the Party incorporated it (the establishment of the Jewish National Home in Palestine.—Ed.) in its war aims. Since then, on no less than eleven occasions, it has reaffirmed its support for 13 Zionism. On one occasion or another, either in Parliamentary debate or on the platform, almost every Labour leader has expressed his personal adherence to the creed, most prominently, Mr. Morrison, Dr. Dalton, Mr. Philip Noel-Baker, Mr. Tom Williams and Mr. Creech-Jones . . . ." 

In his declaration made before the Anglo-American Commission of Enquiry (of which Mr. Crossman was a member) Dr. Chaim Weizmann stated that he had often had to go down on his knees to implore British 'Labour' politicians to moderate their demands on behalf of Zionism. 

The 'Labour' victory of 1945 was (like the 'Russian' revolution of 1917) hailed with enthusiasm by triumphant Zionists all over the world. Mr. Crossman writes (op. cit. p. 61): 

"The Labour Party in the 1945 election had certainly obtained Jewish support by its uncompromising demand for the rescinding of the White Paper of 1939 and its solemn pledge that it would not prevent the Jews from achieving a majority in Palestine by immigration." 

Shortly after the 'Labour' victory, the third and present Lord Rothschild joined the 'Labour' party and now pleads the double cause of Labour-Zionism in the House of Lords. In his efforts on behalf of 'Zion,' Lord Rothschild is ably assisted by Lord (formerly Sir Herbert; Samuel, first 'British' High Commissioner in Palestine and leader in the House of Lords of that 'Liberal' Party to which belonged the second Lord Rothschild of 'Balfour' Declaration fame; Lord Samuel's deputy is the second Marquess of Reading. Both Lord Samuel and Lord Reading are connected with the Central Fund for Jewish Relief and Rehabilitation of which Mr. Anthony de Rothschild and Mr. Harry Sacher, the Zionist, are joint Chairmen and which co-operated intimately with the notorious UNRRA organisation which has facilitated in various ways the Communist-Zionist trek from Russo-Germany to Palestine. 

When Lord Long in the House of Lords (on August 13th, 1947) asked whether the Government knew if the money of the Jewish Funds collected in England was really getting into the right hands "or was assisting illegal immigration" ("The Scotsman," August 14th, 1947), the Marquess of Reading said that he believed every precaution was taken to prevent the money from reaching undesirable destinations, and added the significant words: 

"It was no use issuing vague exhortations to the Jewish community in this country to exercise an influence with the Jewish terrorists which they do not possess. I wish we had some influence." 

Lord Reading is the son of Rufus Isaacs, who in 1917 negotiated a 'deal' on behalf of His Majesty's Government with the financial interests of New York (Kuhn, Loeb and Co.), a deal the terms of which have never been disclosed. Lord Reading's father was subsequently made Viceroy of India and Chairman of the I.C.I., the Chemical Cartel which was founded by Lord Reading's father-in-law Sir Alfred Mond (Lord Melchett) in 1926. The first Lord Melchett was furthermore instrumental in founding the Extended Jewish Agency, of which Mr. Felix Warburg (of Kuhn, Loeb and Co.) became the 'non-Zionist' head. The present Lord Melchett, Lord Reading's brother in law, is managing director of the I.C.I., and Director of the Palestine Electric Corporation. Lord Reading's wife, Eva Violet, only daughter of Alfred Mond and sister of the present Lord Melchett, is Chairman of the British section of the Jewish Agency and Vice-President of the Palestine Appeal Fund. 

Lord Reading's stepmother, Stella, Dowager Marchioness of Reading, widow of Rufus Isaacs, is Chairman of the (British) Women's Voluntary Service for Civil Defence, Vice-Chairman of the Imperial Relations Trust and Vice-Chairman of the British Broadcasting Corporation. In their work for "Zion" the Mond-Melchetts and Isaacs-Readings are assisted by Viscountess Samuel who is Hon. President of the Women's International Zionist Organisation; and by Mrs. Rebecca Sieff, who is President of the Federation of Women Zionists of Great Britain and Ireland, and wife of Israel Moses Sieff, of P.E.P., and Marks and Spencer, Ltd. Mr. Sieff was a member of Major James de Rothschild's First Jewish Commission to Palestine in 1918. 

The Isaacs-Readings and Mond-Melchetts are related to Lord and Lady Nathan of Churt; the latter is now Chairman of the London County Council, while the former, till recently, was ' Labour' Minister for Civil Aviation. On January 27th, 1939, the "Jewish Chronicle" reported the then Col. Nathan as saying: "If Zion falls, the British Empire falls with it." 

This dark saying recalls the ominous statement made by V. Jabotinsky, who in 1931 had declared in Warsaw that the "Jews might become the dynamite which will blow up the British Empire." Mr. Jabotinsky was the founder of the original Jewish Self Defence Corps known as the Hagana, and as the leader of its illegal activities he was sentenced to fifteen years penal servitude by the Judges of the Army of Occupation shortly after the war. Set free after barely six months, he continued his Zionist career which culminated in his being made Chairman of the New Zionist organisation in 1935. Mr. Jabotinsky's organisation, which possesses a London address, demands the liquidation of the entire Jewish Dispersion and their settlement on both sides of the river Jordan. With the first part of his demand no sane Gentile would quarrel, but the granting to Mr. Jabotinsky's organisation of its territorial claims in the Middle East would of course result in that very explosion which he prophesied so confidently in 1931. 

The " Jewish Chronicle," which may be considered the leading Zionist organ in Great Britain, added its voice to the chorus of official Jewish warnings when in its issue of March 3rd, 1939, it stated: 

"Should the deliberations then in process between the contending parties and the British Government result in the destruction of  Jewish rights in that country (Palestine) ... a deep despair would settle on the masses of the Jewish people . . . that would not be a development that any sane statesman could contemplate with unruffled composure. In very deed, they would be confronted by a Jewish problem in a form more acute than at any time in history, and try how they would, they could not escape it. It would thrust up its hydra-head at countless places in the diplomatic scene and block every avenue of international appeasement." 


The Government White Paper of 1939 in limiting the number of immigrants into Palestine constituted a definite threat to Zionist ambitions. It was opposed by leading 'Labour' politicians, as well as by Mr. Winston Churchill who, as Colonial Secretary, assisted the Rothschild-Zionist interests to obtain the 'Rutenberg' Concession in 1922, and by Mr. Leo S. Amery, former director of Marks and Spencer, Ltd., high-degree Freemason, who in 1917 assisted Lord Rothschild in the final draft of the 'Balfour' Declaration. The White Paper is always brought forward by the Zionists as a sufficient justification for the bestial acts committed since 1939 by the Tartar Jews of Palestine. 

In the early part of 1940, Mr, Vladimir Jabotinsky demanded at a mass meeting in New York the creation of a Jewish army and an international covenant outlawing anti-semitism, and permitting mass immigration into Palestine. The prospects for the realization of these ambitions were vastly improved by the accession of Mr. Winston Churchill and his 'Labour'-coalition to power in the spring of the same year. The "Jewish Standard," of May 17, 1940, wrote: 

"It has taken a war and a military disaster to produce governmental changes long overdue. From the Jewish point of view the changes may prove far-reaching . . . . all the new Labour Cabinet Ministers have time and again Supported the Zionist point of view. Sir Archibald Sinclair, the Minister for Air and the Leader of the Opposition Liberals, has for long opposed the Government's anti-Zionist policy. The most potent reinforcement for Zionism in the Cabinet is without doubt Mr. Duff Cooper, the new Minister for Information. His attitude for Zionism is most positive, and he must be regarded as approaching more closely than any other statesman to the larger political Zionism. Mr. Winston Churchill, the Prime Minister, voted against the Palestine White Paper of May, 1939, and even abstained from voting on the Land Regulations in March, although he was a member of the Government." 

And Mr. Leo Amery, we may add, gave up his directorate on the board of Marks and Spencer, Ltd., to become Minister for India. Mr. I.M.Sieff, Managing Director of Marks and Spencer, Ltd., continued to remain in the political background and paid several visits to Washington during these critical years. In November, 1940, Mr. Arthur Greenwood, 'Labour' Minister without Portfolio, sent to American Jewry a message which was likened in importance to the Balfour Declaration of 1917.

Mr. Greenwood's message, which was taken by Rabbi M. P. Perlzweig to Rabbi Wise in the United States, read in part: 

"In building a civilised society after the war there should be a real opportunity for Jews everywhere to make a distinctive contribution. All men of good will must assuredly hope that in the New Europe, Jewish people, in whatever country they live, will have freedom and full equality before the law with every other citizen." 

Obviously, the Zionist Cause was in the best hands. The 'truce' maintained during the opening stages of the war 'against Hitler' between Palestinian Jewry and the British Administration afforded the Zionist High Command an excellent opportunity for training their shock-troops in the most up-to-date methods of modern warfare under expert British technical supervision. 

(The comment of Mr. Crossman on Major Beamish's suggestion ("Hansard," August 12th, 1947) that there is a possibility of Jews and Kurds being trained in terrorism in a Caucasian sanatorium which is the property of the Soviet Trade Unions with a view to their future activities in Palestine, is revealing: " Most of the men have received their training in the British army during the war when they were trained for sabotage." Both suggestions are probably correct. The combination of the 'Caucasian' spirit animating a person equipped with all the best death-gadgets a United World Chemical Cartel can produce, would lead to just such results as we are experiencing.) 

On October 8th, 1942, "The Sentinel," one of the most influential Jewish journals of the U.S.A., wrote: 

"The Second World War is being fought for the defence of the fundamentals of Judaism." Shortly afterwards, Judge Levinthal, the President of the American Zionist Organisation, said that the plan of a Jewish army was approved by Mr. Churchill over a year ago. Judge Levinthal declared ("Evening Standard," December 3, 1942) that "after the war, the existence of a Jewish army in Palestine might be a very useful argument in emphasising what the Zionists claim to be their rights in Palestine." 

We learn ("Palestine Information Bulletin," October, 1946) that from 1941 onwards increasing numbers of Palestinian Jews "were employed by Allied Strategical Services . . . Outstanding work in Psychological Warfare and the collection of vital information for Allied Intelligence was done with Jewish co-operation." 

During the years 1940 to 1943, Palestine became, in fact, one of the principal intelligence centres for the United Nations. It became the chief 'works' which provided the ammunition for the leaflet-wars conducted by the 'Allies' against the countries subsequently 'liberated' by the Soviets. Jewish leaders continued to stress the Jewish nature of the war and the results the Jews expected to accrue to them from its successful conclusion. In 1942, Rabbi Hillel Silver, 'American' member of the Jewish Agency, declared during a tour of Europe on behalf of the Palestine War Appeal (whatever that may mean) that "there would  never be peace in Europe until the problem of the Jewish People in Europe was solved. And the world ought to know it."—(Conway Hall, December, 1942). 

On January 22nd, 1943, Mr. Berl Locker, the 'British' member of the Jewish Agency, said at a British Zionist Conference that the Jews "had a right to come to the world and say 'here is the Jewish problem which you must solve. Otherwise there will not be any peace in the world'." 

There was not much peace in the world when these words were being spoken, and the continued insistence by the Zionists on a 'Palestinian' solution of the Jewish Problem does not augur well for the future peace of the world. If the British administration was prepared—for the duration—to shut their eyes to Zionist intrigues, the Arab world was not. On June 11, 1943, the Wahabi King of Saudi Arabia published a declaration in his own newspaper "Om El Kura": 

"First, I do not know that the Jews have any justification for their claims in Palestine .... the Arabs conquered Palestine over 1300 years ago, freeing it from the Romans, and since that time it has remained Muslim. The Jews, therefore, have no right to the country .... I see that the Jews' insistence on Palestine cannot be justified (a) because it is unjust to the Arabs and Muslims, and (b) because it only creates friction between the Muslims and their friends. If the Jews need a place in which to live, there are countries in Europe, America, and elsewhere that are larger, more fertile, and more convenient to their interests . . . ." 

It was in the same year, if our memory does not fail us, that an equally statesmanlike pronouncement on Palestine was made by Lord Moyne, who also suggested that there might be somewhere in the world a more suitable territory for the Jews to settle. His Lordship mentioned Madagascar as a possible haven for the Jews. 

On November 20th, 1943, the British flag was hauled down from a British Government building and replaced by the Jewish flag in Tel-Aviv. At the trial of the terrorists, the prosecuting Counsel stated: "There exists in Palestine a vast, wealthy, unscrupulous gun-running organization, threatening the safety of Palestine and having its tentacles outside Palestine." 

In a footnote to his book: "Alternative to Death" (pp. 70-71), the Earl of Portsmouth states: 

"The Palestine Economic Corporation had a large share of economic power in that country (early years of the war). It controlled the Palestine Mortgage and Credit Bank, Ltd., Bayside Land Corporation, Palestine Water Co., Palestine Economic Corporation of New York, and the Central Bank of Co-operative Institutions in Palestine, Ltd. Also, it owned considerable interests in many other Palestinian companies including Palestine Mining Syndicate, Ltd., Palestine Potash, Ltd., and the Agricultural Mortgage Company of Palestine, Ltd. The headquarters of the Palestine Economic Corporation were not in  Palestine or the Levant nor in England, which is responsible for law and order in Palestine. Instead they were in New York on Lexington Avenue." 

Among the Directors were Messrs. Guggenheimer, E. M. M. Warburg and Benjamin V. Cohen, adviser to successive Presidents, and a dozen other influential "American" Zionists. In other words, the Palestine Corporation is the Financial-Chemical Cartel organ for Palestinian exploitation. It is protected by British soldiers. In Great Britain, a resolution was adopted at the Annual Labour Conference of 1943, "reaffirming the traditional policy of the Labour Party in favour of building Palestine as the Jewish National Home." Messrs. Crossman and Foot comment in "A Palestine Munich," p. 11: 

"By 1943, a new factor had emerged. Hitler's plan to exterminate the Jews of Europe had become known, and it was already clear that, when the war ended, the Jewish survivors of the concentration camps would, for the most part, desire to leave Europe and go to the National Home."  

Another "Labour" politician, Norman Bentwich, who is Professor of International Relations at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, mentions in his book "Wanderer in War" (Gollancz, 1946) that during the first years of the war about a hundred thousand "refugees from Hitler's tyranny" had been temporarily absorbed in Great Britain, while another hundred thousand had found their way to Palestine: 

" .... in the mixed Jewish and Gentile islets, which evacuation and the spreading war industries had thrown up, the aliens sowed their intellectual seed .... boys and girls of the Youth Immigration for Palestine, brought from Germany and Central Europe in 1939, formed little Jerusalem's, so to say, in England's green and pleasant land. While they waited to go to Palestine, they could be pioneers, and spread their example of a productive socialist life in the country of their sojourn." 

Supported, no doubt, by these swarms of evangelists spreading a gospel to which they subscribed, the British 'Labour' politicians continued to "reaffirm their traditional Palestine policy." In 1944, Mr. Attlee suggested at the Annual Labour Conference that the Arabs "be encouraged to move out as the Jews moved in," In the House of Commons, Mr. Philip Noel-Baker, 'Labour' Minister of State and Big Businessman, said that he could not but doubt that 

"it was the intention of those who made the Mandate that through the National Home Palestine should become as Jewish as Canada is British." 

In the same year, Mr. Maisky (real name: Steinman), the Soviet-Jewish Ambassador to the Court of St. James, toured the Jewish colonies and industries in Palestine, discussing with Zionist leaders 

"the problem of Palestine's absorptive capacity and the post-war solution of the Jewish problem. There is little doubt that, upon his  return to Moscow, he submitted a comprehensive report .... the Labour party is predominant in Zionism . . . ." (Eliahu Ben-Horn in "The Soviet Wooing of Palestine.") 

Summing up the activities of the terrorists from January till September, 1944, Mr. Douglas Reed says ("Catholic Herald," January 12, 1945): "This Jewish Fascist organisation murdered ten British constables and wounded many others; attempted to murder the British High Commissioner and wounded him,his A.D.C., and his driver; raided and fired the Jerusalem Police headquarters; raided the Jaffa Police headquarters and attacked four other police stations with a force of 'at least 150 men'; tried to blow up St. George's Cathedral; used on these and many other occasions bombs, grenades, tommy-guns, automatic pistols, etc., etc., etc. These attacks 'seriously impeded the war effort of the United Nations' (Colonial Secretary, October 11). In November these Jewish Fascists murdered a British Minister, Lord Moyne." 

On October 11th, 1944, Col. Stanley stated in Parliament that there had been 

"a recrudescence of Jewish terrorist activities in Palestine. On the night of 27th September, attacks were made on four police stations by members of the Irgun Zvai Leumi, the military organisation of the New Zionist organisation." 

On December 6th, 1944, Col. Stanley explained that the Irgun Zvai Leumi was formed in 1937 by the late Vladimir Jabotinsky, the leader of the New Zionist Organisation, and the original founder of the Hagana. 

On the occasion of the murder of Lord Moyne (who had so incautiously pointed to Madagascar as a possible haven for the Jews the year before) by two Jewish youths who had been dispatched to Cairo from Palestine for that purpose, the Chief Rabbi of Great Britain, Dr. Hertz (who was born in Bohemia, and trained in New York) said: "The Cairo Criminals are men crazed by the fiendish butcheries of their kith and kin in Poland .... infected by the evil example of the Mufti's, terrorist campaigns." How this could explain or excuse their murder of a British official, who could not possibly have anything to do with either of these matters, it is difficult to see. The same argument has been advanced by reputedly intelligent Jewish world leaders time and again in extenuation of the succession of crimes committed by the Jewish proletariat in Palestine since that date. Dr. Hertz' disclaimer, on behalf of "every Jew," of any responsibility or sympathy with the murderers of Lord Moyne, was apparently forgotten the following year when the murderers were hanged in Cairo. In April, 1945, the "New York Post" published a whole-page advertisement by the " New Zionist Organisation " of America from which we quote: 

"Two young Jews were hanged in Egypt for the shooting of a British Minister. The executioner was an Egyptian . . . but the hand  that guided the hangman was British ... It is ... in the interests of America to call Britain to order, and see that justice shall be done to the Jews in Palestine and peace shall reign in the Holy Land." 

The subscribers to the fund of this organisation were informed that " by a ruling of the Treasury Department, all contributions to the New Zionist Organisation of America are tax-exempt." The Financial Secretary to the U.S. Treasury at the time was Mr. Henry Morgenthau Jr., Chairman of the United Jewish Appeal in aid of European Jews, the " American " counterpart of the Central British Fund of which Mr. Anthony de Rothschild is Chairman. 


next24s
1945: EXIT HITLER, THE "TYRANT." 
ENTER BEVIN, THE "OPPRESSOR."