Depop Secrets
by Kevin Galalae
Preface
To convince the world that the international system commits genocide within nations to prevent nuclear war between nations seems an impossible task; even more so that the original justification for genocide was and continues to be the pursuit of prosperity. First, you have to get past the sentinels to this secret, the 193 UN Member States, whose intelligence services will come at you from every direction to stop you from telling the world that every national leader is an unwilling participant in a global program of population control based on mass murder. You will be imprisoned, discredited, derided, bankrupted, and emotionally undermined until you lose your mind, commit suicide or starve to death out on the street.
If by some miracle you survive the assaults you then have to put together the world’s most complex puzzle from indirect and circumstantial evidence to explain why, how and when this system came to be and who it serves and you have to do this under the most difficult circumstances, under constant threat of death and imprisonment and in the knowledge that no one will dare publish your work. You will never see your wife and children again, your property will be taken away from you, no one will employ you and you will never again sleep in your own bed or know any creature comforts let alone security. You are now at war with every government on earth and you must come to terms with the idea that your life may come to an abrupt and brutal end at any time. The only thing you can rely on is your inner strength. Reason will get you through. You must become a self-contained island and never doubt the importance of your task or your ultimate success regardless how hopeless the situation looks.
If by some miracle you succeed in painting a convincing picture, and manage to stay alive, you then have to provide scientific proof that elected governments the world over, the UN system, the military-industrial complex, and religious authorities are cooperating in genocide to pre-empt greater disasters and imperceptibly commit genocide by adulterating the basic elements of life and misusing medicine and public health to subvert fertility and promote morbidity so as to control life from both ends, births and deaths. And you must scream this from the rooftops. You are now at war with the world’s ignorance, incredulity, inertia, apathy and ingrained beliefs and you must come to terms with the animosity that you will encounter at every turn. The only one you can rely on is yourself. Faith will get you through. You must never lose faith in yourself or in your fellow man and must never despair or become bitter irrespective of the resistance and criticism you will encounter every step of the way.
If by some miracle you make yourself heard and establish your credibility over every government, organization and institution and shatter prejudice and bigotry, envy and hate, it will have taken years and it will still be a generation before you will be thanked, if at all. Throughout this time you have to stay alive and labor without regard to yourself and without knowing if you will ever see your children again. You are now at war with vested interests and you must come to terms with your universal unpopularity and with abject poverty because no one will want you to succeed if their own interests are at stake and the culture of death on which the current system is built is the foundation of all interests. The only way you can prevail is by staying true to what is true. Truth will get you through. You must become truth’s sanctuary and torchbearer and must learn how to discern falsehoods sold as truths and truths condemned as falsehoods.
And if by the end of this mighty and relentless struggle you are still standing and you can still smile and you can still love then it is hope and love that got you through.
Behind every word, between every line and within every thought in this book reside the reason, faith, truth, hope and love that got me through and that will also get you through to the other side, beyond the illusion and behind the lies…into the light and into the future.
CHAPTER ONE
STANDING IN THE WAY:
THE STRUGGLE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS
April 2012
Human rights have always existed but have been recognized by different names. Their most concise and ancient expression is the golden rule, treat others as you want to be treated, which is common to all cultures and religions and is the clearest proof that human rights are universal.
What has changed over time is their classification and codification. As societies became more complex and encompassed ever greater numbers of people, social strata and opportunities for interaction the number of human rights grew by necessity, out of conflict and appeasement.
The most basic human rights – the right to life, food and shelter – are the original natural rights imbedded in man’s genes by instinct and survival. Their recognition as such predates man’s ability to express them, which came much later, first as a thought and then as a linguistic achievement. But the anguished grunt of the cave man who suffered the injustices of his brutal existence and the lofty language of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights have one and the same source, man’s innate sense of right and wrong, and one and the same meaning, the human, the all too human realization that all men deserve the same rights, that all men are equal under the sun. It is this recognition that elevated human beings above beasts and formed and still forms the basis of all social structures and the guiding rod of all human interactions.
To this extent, the equality and universality of human rights have as long a history as upright human beings. They also have equally old and powerful enemies. The most ancient and persistent is the scarcity of resources, followed by lack of cooperation and poor social organization, and last by hierarchical power structures fed by man’s vanity for wealth and status. These are the forces that have challenged and compromised the equality and universality of human rights throughout history and why to this day our rights are not inalienable but merely conditional, not concrete reality as much as intangible hope.
The first and oldest enemy of human rights, the scarcity of natural resources, has begot fierce competition between men and in the process some have lost what others have gained. Competition for scarce resources is an enduring threat to the equal distribution of economic rights and the uniform enforcement of political rights, for the latter are very much a consequence of the former. That is to say, unless people are fed and clothed and sheltered, the State has little tolerance for their citizens’ freedom of speech, conscience or religion, which take a backseat to those rights that mean life and death.
The second enemy, lack of cooperation and poor social organization, has been amplified by society’s growing complexity. When communities expanded and the division of labour gave rise to special interests and to widely different perspectives due to one’s place and function in society, these divisions became gateways for new abuses, of which slavery is the most brutal. Though slavery exists to this day as debt bondage and indentured servitude, it is no longer the rule but the exception.
The last enemy of human rights is man’s vanity, his need to acquire wealth and status and the price he is willing to make others pay for it. Man is perpetually fighting this enemy within from the moment he acquires sufficient physical and mental strength to impose himself on others, or to resist the imposition of others on him. Unfortunately for human civilization these invidious distinctions have become part of nearly every society’s values and norms and are at the basis of the hierarchies that run the show. By accident more than design, they wreak havoc on the principle of equality between men affecting every human right in existence. And because hierarchical societies justify the greatest levels of aggression and can force men to act contrary to their nature, they have largely displaced communal and egalitarian societies that frown upon the exploitation of many for the benefit of the few. That is why conflict and war between nations and ideologies have caused the most gruesome atrocities, the vilest form of human rights violations.
We have waged war on these three enemies with some success, but as we have focused our attention on each one of them in isolation a new enemy has appeared on the scene; the strongest and most insidious incarnation yet of what we may simplistically define as the embodiment of evil.
This enemy has combined the original three into one and has as a result grown in strength, scope and destructive force. It is all the more dangerous because we no longer have a clear idea of what is good and what is evil once the perspective from which we look at human rights is global. The enemy in question and that is yet to be identified as such by most of us is mankind itself through its excessive consumerism and exponential population growth.
We are 7 billion strong and require all Earth’s resources and more to satisfy our basic needs let alone our insatiable wants. Since we have long outgrown the planet’s ability to support us, judging by our environmental impact, the global struggle for resources has made their scarcity and their unequal distribution all the more obvious. An American consumes roughly 40 times more resources and energy than an African, 20 times more than an Asian, and 3 times more than a European. We have reached the most advanced level of cooperation and social organization – as we have had to, in order to make the most of the world’s resources and distribute them across borders – but we have yet to bridge the gap in consumption levels and this exacerbates our cultural differences and animosities, which are all the more obvious now that we interact with one another globally, both physically and virtually, more than ever before. As a result, the most cruel and numerous violations of human rights are committed by members of one culture or ethnic group against members of another in a grand process of supremacy, exploitation and assimilation that brings with it the fear of the unknown and insecurity. And in all of this, man’s vanity works in mysterious ways to achieve global objectives through newly formed international hierarchies that will hopefully bring the intended results through what has become the most ambitious plan to coerce mankind to do what is necessary before it is too late and long before men outgrow their geopolitical ignorance, cultural prejudices and dated loyalties.
The legal enforcement of human rights is the last hurdle in the struggle for their realization. It is why we have built an international legal framework at the end of World War II, which has succeeded in softening the edges of human rights abuse. But as long as human rights stand in the way of someone’s greed or power lust, of a people’s prejudices towards another, or of a country’s economic and hegemonic ambitions, they will remain more hope than reality, especially if humankind continues to grow in numbers and to exceed the planet’s resources and regenerative capacity.
At least we now understand that we are the enemy.
CHAPTER TWO
THE RIGHT TO RIGHTS:
THE GEOPOLITICS OF HUMAN RIGHTS
April 2012
Humanity’s problems are so severe that only two options remain: one, to act concisely without the people’s knowledge or permission; and two, to urgently forge global consensus so that accelerated and coordinated action becomes possible and national prerogatives are voluntarily sacrificed for supranational goals.
To avoid a fight for supremacy and hedge against failure, both options are being pursued at the same time in a complementary fashion. The US military industrial-security complex and select allies are pursuing the first option, which we may call the Hard or Military Solution, while the EU and the UN are pursuing the latter, the Soft or Civilian Solution. The goal is the same though the functions and methods of each camp are worlds apart. The outcome is sadly predictable.
What is the goal? It is to prevent humanity from self-destruction, which requires arresting global warming and environmental degradation and reducing the global population and softening the edges of poverty.
What are their functions? The military camp is tasked with acquiring tight control of the population and suppressing resistance to buy time for the civilian plan to work and, should it fail, supplant it. The civilian camp’s role is to create the economic, political and legal framework necessary to implement a coordinated plan and relies on the military to be the stick to their carrot. The name of the military plan is unknown, but I call it Agenda 12 for Global Control, while the civilian plan is well known as Agenda 21 and the Millennium Development Goals.
To implement its plan, the military camp, led by the Anglo-American intelligence agencies, had to bypass the rule of law to be able to act contrary to national constitutions and international covenants in the name of security. This was not politically and legally possible without a catalytic event of sufficiently cataclysmic proportions to instill mass fear and panic and bring the issue of security to the forefront. All evidence shows that 9/11 was helped along by the US security apparatus while 7/7 received assistance from their British counterparts. The two tragedies were then used to start a war on a created and invisible enemy, Islamic terrorism, which conveniently targets countries situated on the world’s last remaining and significant oil reserves, and to impose on the frightened populace at home incremental measures of control akin to martial law. As a result, civil society, the judiciary and the media have been leashed through broad-sweeping counter-terrorism laws that impose acquiescence on non-governmental organizations, super-injunctions on the courts, and censorship on news organizations. Also, countries reluctant to cooperate with the master plan can now be threatened with a crippling energy crisis by denying them access to oil.
To implement its plan, the civilian camp needed to overcome two critical impediments: political and economic alignment and adaptive capacity. The first is a work in progress and refers to economic and political integration across frontiers to ensure that everyone pulls in the same direction and the corporate and political establishments of every country take orders from the center. The second, adaptive capacity, refers to how fast societies can adapt to necessary change, which depends on education, investment, tolerance, innovation and, most of all, acquiescence, the tools that make societies adaptable and pliable, so that nations and people can keep up with the pace and direction set by the centre and the people are harnessed to the master plan of the New World Order with or without their will.
What are the methods? The military camp employs surveillance, censorship, misinformation, false flag operations, secrecy, created enemies, intimidation, sanctions, torture, imprisonment, assassination and war. These methods are used against states that refuse to fully subscribe to the New World Order; countries such as Iran, Venezuela, Syria, Cuba, North Korea and Zimbabwe. They are also used against individuals who see through the deceit and expose aspects of the master plan, be they whistleblowers or astute observers; individuals like Bradley Manning, Janet Bürgermeister, Thomas Andrew Drake, Janet Phelan, Edward Snowden, Jeffrey Silverman, Julian Assange, and myself.
The civilian camp, through its banking arm, employs fiscal manipulation and debt to force the developed world to give up its social safety net and the developing world to accept the privatization of national assets, both of which are necessary to divert enough money to fund the master plan. Through its corporate arm, it uses capital from the developed world and labour from the developing world to monopolize the means of production, destabilize national economies and irreversibly integrate the marketplace so as to transfer economic control from national to transnational entities and interests, which is necessary if people are to abandon their national loyalties to international entities and interests. Through its political arm, national leaders are convinced, corrupted or coerced to cooperate and international organizations are staffed with insiders. Through its legal arm, national and international courts are curtailed to ensure that violations and crimes committed in the name of the master plan are buried or whitewashed. And through its media arm, the masses are kept obedient and ignorant.
What is the outcome? The planners like to believe that the Soft Solution will succeed and the world will emerge as a closely knit confederation of nation states that have divested much of their sovereignty and authority to a supranational infrastructure capable of coordinating the world’s resources and knowhow to solve our environmental and overpopulation problems peacefully. They also like to believe that the rule of law will be reinstated and the military industrial-security apparatus will be brought back under control. But these are mistaken beliefs because the emerging leaders are by necessity immoral individuals who will be too well entrenched and impervious to justice due to establishment-wide complicity in crimes that the general population could never forgive once aware. They will instead force each other to commit ever greater atrocities to hide previous crimes. The outcome will be an environmentally stable world culled of excess population by waves of man-made pandemics and by low intensity warfare via chemical and biological weapons delivered through the basic elements of life (water and food), and ruled by a global elite with special rights and privileges atop a downtrodden general population living in perpetual servitude and fear.
Regardless whether the civilian or the military plan prevails, the general population faces the same dismal outcome, global dictatorship.
Already, the victims of this global master plan are human rights and civil liberties worldwide, the national constitutions and international covenants that enshrine them, and the international legal system that safeguards them. The evidence of this decay is provided by the flood of individuals who turn to the international courts in despair and in overwhelming numbers to seek protection from their own states whose violations increase in gravity and frequency from year to year. What they find is not justice but the establishment’s last line of defence.
What they find is that our right to rights has been irreversibly destroyed. It is now conditional on the greater geopolitical agenda of our global leadership that is intent on saving mankind from itself and the planet from mankind by any means necessary, which requires the temporary suspension of our rights and liberties but which will in turn necessitate their permanent annihilation.
What is saved in the end will not be worth having because what is lost in the process will prove to be what makes life worthwhile.
CHAPTER THREE
THE EFFECTS OF OVERPOPULATION ON HUMAN RIGHTS
May 2012
Many past civilizations grew beyond their food supply or resources and collapsed. The people of Easter Island, the Mayas and the Mycenaean civilization provide compelling examples. The modern world is also on the brink of self-destruction and this time it will be global unless we act decisively at this eleventh hour.
The approaching collapse is foretold by the depletion of natural resources and violent competition for them, environmental damage, global warming, conflict, poverty, desperation and the impotence of God and science to rescue us from ourselves; all of which impinge in one way or another on human rights and civil liberties. The ultimate cause for these dire effects or at the very least for their unprecedented gravity is our overwhelming numbers. There are simply too many of us, we are multiplying too fast and place too great a burden on the planet.1 1. The principle fallacy of overpopulation deniers is their reliance on the argument that the population will peak at 9 billion by 2040 and therefore we have nothing to worry about. This flawed argument, however, fails to consider that the reason the population will peak at 9 billion by 2040 is that the international community has used covert chemical, biological, psychosocial and economic methods of population control since 1945; methods that have been carefully concealed because they by-pass democratic processes and constitute genocide. Without the active suppression of human fertility for the past 68 years the population would continue to grow at natural rates and double every 25 years until humanity collapses under its own weight. The demographic transition (from growing to stable to decreasing population) would never occur as it is a wholly engineered process and is most certainly not the result of affluence and development. Instead, civilization grinds to a halt and ends in famine, war or environmental devastation/resource depletion, as the demise of countless civilizations prior to modern times clearly show. For clarification on this point see “Killing Us Softly: Causes and Consequences of the Global Depopulation Policy”.
Overpopulation is exacerbating the scarcity of natural resources, placing impossible demands on science and technology, causing environmental damage beyond the planet’s ability to regenerate, making life hectic and stressful and overregulated, and igniting ethnic and cultural conflicts the world over.
The price of staple foods and basic commodities have nearly tripled in the last decade and are increasingly out of reach for the two billion who earn less than $2 a day. That is how economic rights have been washed away en masse by increasing poverty. The votes of citizens are losing their value because the big decisions are not made in the national assemblies but in the boardrooms of transnational corporations and international organizations where the people have no representation and no say. That is how political rights have been diluted to mere shadows of their former selves. The norms and values by which we live are losing their meaning because they are based on dated loyalties, old knowledge and false comforts, which is why we blame others for our shortcomings and sense of disorientation and impotence, taking out our anger and frustrations on the people who are least like us and most vulnerable. That is how class and civilizational rifts have come to dominate our times and cloud our judgment and outlook with dire effects on cultural and group rights.
And this happens not because there is a lack of will and compassion but because we are in a catch 22 situation, the better we do the more we multiply and the longer we live, with disruptive consequences for the social, economic and environmental balances on which our well-being depends and to which we have become accustomed to. This forces us to think and work smarter than ever before, to forge consensus and cooperate deeper and wider than ever before, and to restructure and build a social, political, economic and environmental architecture that for the first time in our history considers the entire planet and all of humankind. We live accelerated lives that place unfathomable burdens on our ability to cope and adapt to these global demands. And because we are still developing the global consciousness we need to cope with these demands, we feel overwhelmed and inadequate.
Yet the logic is simple. More people, beyond the 7 billion we already have, require increased economic and industrial activity at a time when 60% of us are already malnourished because we have surpassed the planet’s ability to support us. The inevitable by-products of increased economic and industrial activity are resource depletion and environmental pollution, at a time when both are at acute levels, which in turn lower quality of life and standards of living for present and future generations and threaten the very survival of the species by further damaging the planet’s life support systems.
The argument that there is enough for all of us if only we shared is no longer defendable. We are 7 billion strong and at current fertility rates we are adding a billion more every twelve years. Half of us are living in abject poverty and there is nowhere to expand to without destabilizing the last remaining healthy biotopes.
Those who want to do something about it are caught between two futilities: on the one hand, trying to empower, motivate and educate the inert masses so they act of their own volition; and on the other, trying to overcome the entrenched interests, conservative positions and rapacious instincts of those who occupy positions of power and influence and who want to pursue global solutions only so long as the burden falls on the majority while the benefits are theirs alone.
But is it really that simple or this oversimplification hides far more than meets the eye? Are the masses inert because they do not care enough to know or because they do not know enough to care? Are they disempowered because they have willingly given up their right to self-determination or because that right was systematically usurped? Are they unmotivated to act because they are lazy and afraid or because their hands have been tied and their ability to act curtailed? All these statements seem equally true.
And what about the leadership? Are those in power willing to sacrifice the future of the planet and the wellbeing of their fellow men and of their own children because they are too greedy and power hungry or are they simply restricted by the limitations of their office and the demands of society for immediate gratification? Are they too conservative and rapacious to act with foresight or are they held back by local and national interests, to say nothing of religious beliefs and social mores? Are they reluctant to use their power and influence for global, long-term objectives because they fall outside their proper duties or are they prohibited by the democratic promises they made to the voters or by the pressing responsibilities they have towards employees and shareholders? Again, all of the above is true because our systems are outdated and imprison us all.
Everyone agrees that overpopulation is the primary global problem and that unless we solve it everything else we do is futile.2 To solve the overpopulation problem we need a comprehensive plan and a central agency to coordinate it. The agency is the UN but the plan is hidden in Agenda 21 and the Millennium Development Goals – the world’s roadmaps for sustainable development and the eradication of poverty, hunger and disease – rather than isolated and given the attention it deserves. That is so because the UN coordinated Conference on Population and Development held in Cairo, Egypt, in 1994, and its Program of Action, which is the steering document for the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), encountered such fierce opposition from religious and conservative groups that it was never repeated. 2 The existence of family planning programs in every country on earth demonstrates that policy makers across the globe agree that overpopulation is a problem they cannot ignore. However, due to the sensitive and politically explosive nature of this subject overpopulation is discussed only behind closed doors. The Kissinger cables released by WikiLeaks offer a window into the reluctance of policy makers to discuss their population control methods openly: http://search.wikileaks.org/plusd/.
This approach invites secrecy, coercion and deception and a problem of this magnitude cannot be accomplished by these means. This approach also encourages man’s worst instincts and entrenches and unifies already powerful elites with dire repercussions on justice, freedom and equity. This approach, in other words, amplifies all other problems in order to tackle overpopulation. Clearly a top-down approach cannot work for this giant problem unless it is mirrored by and synchronized with a bottom-up effort.
The bottom-up effort, however, will not materialize unless our leadership removes the barriers it has erected to keep us ignorant, indifferent and impotent. Our potential for action will remain unrealized unless the media is allowed to educate rather than forced to deceive; the Internet is used to let the truth out and not disseminate lies; industry satisfies legitimate needs not unnecessary wants; political leaders lead instead of leading us astray; and unless man’s need to believe is guided to trust in himself rather than divest responsibility onto God’s or science’s shoulders.
And none of this will happen unless enough people have the courage to jump over the triple fence of economic exploitation, political manipulation and religious indoctrination erected around us by our own leaders, histories and cultures and open the gates for everyone else so that together we can shatter the matrix of control. We must in other words earn the right to be masters of our own destiny and to do so we must be able to stand on the shoulders of giants not hide in their or God’s shadow. People who refuse to act with Earth and mankind in mind deserve to be cut out from the decision making process. They cannot be trusted with the destiny of man and the planet’s wellbeing.
Yet if we fail to rise to the challenge in sufficient numbers we are doomed to a bleak and brutal future. The wealthy and the elites that buttress them will only accelerate an ongoing covert plan that uses food and water as weapons of depopulation and genetic degeneration. According to this plan, the rich eat organic and whole foods while the poor are relegated through economic deprivation and food industrialization to excitotoxin-laden and chemically altered foods, genetically modified organisms, ammoniated meat, and to fruit, vegetables and grains grown in soils depleted of minerals and enzymes; a diet that condemns us to obesity, sterility, neurodegenerative brain diseases, mental retardation and premature death. The rich drink mineral water bottled at source from the world’s cleanest aquifers while the poor are relegated to drinking fluoride laced and heavy metal laden tap water that lowers fertility. The rich live on large tracts of land away from pollution and stress while the poor are corralled in ever denser urban environments where life is increasingly restrictive, hectic and dehumanizing.
Our devolution and depopulation are being engineered to turn eugenics into self-fulfilling prophecy and divide mankind into a physically and mentally distinguishable upper class that lives long and well and an inferior underclass that lives less and poorly. This outcome is being foretold by evolutionary theorist Oliver Curry who predicts that the human species will split in two; a handsome and smart elite and a retarded and goblin-like rabble.
It is science now and not the Church that issues indulgences to those who seek absolution for their economic and political sins. And the United States, where the Hard Solution I spoke of in my previous article is well on its way, needs a lot of indulgences. The United States, where the war on the poor is most advanced and the conceits of the elite are well entrenched, now ranks 37th in health while in mid-20th century it ranked 1st. The US has decayed to such an extent in only 50 years as to have the highest infant mortality rates among developed nations, the highest cancer rates in the world, and to rank only 24th in life expectancy although it spends more than any other country on health.
This is not by accident but by design, which is why the US is the only developed nation where the poor are deprived of medical insurance while the rich enjoy the best care in the world, where income inequality is seen as a God-given and immutable reality, and where toxic food is deliberately promoted for mass consumption. Not surprisingly, the US is also the only country in the world where the lowest socioeconomic class is already distinguishable at a glance from the upper class by their physical appearance, language use and mental characteristics.
Economic, social and political policies are used to create genetic inequality, which in turn contribute to greater social and economic disparities, so much so that in the not so distant future there will be a “parting of the ways between the genetic ‘haves’ and the genetic ‘have-nots’”, which will in time give rise to two varieties of humans, “the ‘gracile’ descendants of a genetic upper class and the ‘robust’ descendants of a genetic underclass. The genetic ‘halves’ will tend to be tall, thin, symmetrical, clean, healthy, intelligent and creative. The genetic ‘have-nots’ will be short, stocky, asymmetrical, grubby, unhealthy and less intelligent.”
Paving the way for this outcome are technological and social factors that are rapidly changing the characteristics of our species. The more advanced our technology becomes the less directly dependent we are on our fellow man and this is diminishing our moral sentiments and making us more selfish and self centered. Furthermore, the more restrictive and regulated our society becomes, as it must, due to constantly increasing population densities and growing urbanization, the more we begin to resemble “domesticated animals: enfeebled, ineffectual, pampered, homogenous, spoilt, and juvenile”.
It is safe to say that the rifts within and between nations, as well as the widespread disintegration of families, reflect both our growing selfishness and our domesticated attitudes and that it won’t be long before there will be a goblin-like underclass relegated to a life of misery and servitude and a God-like upper-class claiming divine rights. The destruction of the middle class and the emergence of a global society made up of billionaires and paupers augur this very outcome.
Will we allow overpopulation to push the elites towards extreme forms of social Darwinism and eugenic solutions that render our rights null and void or will we assume control of our destinies and bring about an era of equal and universal respect for human rights? If we continue to be selfish and act like domesticated animals the first outcome will occur by default. But if we awaken and start acting like rational, free and engaged human beings then the latter outcome is inevitable.
One thing is certain; we will get what we deserve.
One other thing is equally certain; once we run out of fossil fuels, in a century or so, we will no longer be able to sustain the existing population levels. If by then we will have succeeded in transitioning to renewable energy sources and using natural resources sustainably, we will be able to at most support 2 billion people. This gives us just enough time to reduce our population to that level within one hundred years if every couple on earth voluntarily agrees to have only one child.
However you slice it and dice it, we must, through “mutual coercion, mutually agreed upon”, relinquish the “freedom to breed”; a conclusion arrived at in 1968 by Paul Ehrlich and more valid now than ever. If we refuse to accept this inconvenient truth then the only alternative is depopulation through war, famine and pestilence. All indications are that Christians will fight Muslims for the remaining oil and that the rest of the world will be drawn into this conflict on one side or the other; a conflict that will involve not just conventional but also, and probably primarily, biological weapons as a means of killing two birds with one stone; control of the last remaining oil reserves and depopulation. And Jews, as always, will be at the center of the conflagration playing both sides to their advantage.
If we let it come to that because we are too obtuse to exercise voluntary self restraint on the procreation front and shared sacrifices on the economic front, the world as we know it and with it all our rights and liberties will come to an abrupt and miserable end.
Those unlucky to survive will look upon the past with envious nostalgia, be they goblins or gods.
CHAPTER FOUR
LOSING CREDIBILITY:
WHOSE INTERESTS DO NGO’S REPRESENT?
July 2012
On 20 July 2012, President Putin approved a law that requires foreign funded non-governmental organizations (NGOs), of which there are over 1000 on Russian soil according to the Itar-Tass news agency, to register with the Justice Ministry as “foreign agents”.
With characteristic hypocrisy, Washington denounced the new Russian law as “anti-democratic, but failed to mention that its Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) requires since 1938 all foreign-funded organizations, except those funded by Israel, to register as foreign agents with the Counterespionage Section in the National Security Division of the Justice Department. Such criticism is particularly distasteful at a time when Congress is debating laws to prosecute journalists for exposing violations against human rights activists.
Activists in Russia and abroad are rightfully worried and decry the law as a throwback to the Soviet era. They see it as an underhanded way to suppress the protest movement and undermine their ability to protect citizens from corrupt officials and overbearing state institutions, of which Russia has never had a shortage. The government rightfully justifies the new law as necessary to improve transparency, which is the polite way of saying that it will no longer tolerate the subversion of its political process and the authority of the state by foreign entities and interests.
Russia Today reports that a recent opinion poll shows 64% of Russians agree foreign-funded NGOs should have no part in the country’s political life. The law has even stronger support across political parties, having passed through both houses of Parliament with overwhelming majorities.
To better understand the Russian government’s perspective let us imagine a world in which influential Russian NGOs, like the Moscow Helsinki Watch Group, begin to focus their activities on violations committed abroad while becoming indifferent to those at home.
Let us also imagine that the Russian state becomes the main source of funding for their exported NGO’s and that a revitalized communist party donates millions of rubles to their annual budgets. These internationally-minded Russian NGOs then begin to identify every economic prisoner in the West as a political victim by pointing out that in capitalist societies economic exploitation is the main vehicle of political control. They take issue with America’s unjust wars, drone strikes that have killed 175 innocent children to date and its terrifyingly high incarceration rate, which at 735 prisoners for every 100,000 citizens is nearly as high as that of the Soviet Union under Stalin at 830 prisoners for every 100,000 citizens. They also highlight through Amnesty-like appeals thousands of Westerners who file against their states at the European Court of Human Rights and who hunger and protest at the court’s gates in hope of justice only to be ignored.
Let us imagine that they become hyperactive and highly successful in showing drastic deterioration in the social, legal, economic and political fabric of Europe and North America and that Russian newspapers and broadcasters have the global reach to embarrass the West for each and every violation thus exposed.
Let us imagine that while these Russian NGOs are doing a fine job abroad addressing violations large and small, a near collapse of human rights and civil liberties at home in a new Russia expanding its economic influence and political ideology abroad by neo-imperialist means is treated as a taboo subject by Russia’s civil society and media because they have been fully subsumed in the government’s grand geopolitical agenda.
Last but not least, let us imagine that this new Russia controls the international legal infrastructure and the Bretton Woods organisations being their main source of funding and also contributes more than any other nation or bloc of nations to the running of the UN and its many subsidiary agencies and as such sets the international agenda, which is conceived solely by Russian and Chinese think-tanks and is called the People’s World Order.
How would Western nations treat these Russian-funded NGOs in their midst? It is safe to say that none of them would be allowed to operate for very long in the US or Europe. They would be perceived as Trojan Horses and pursued with extreme prejudice by a new brand of McCarthyism.
Seen in this light, the tolerance the Russian government has shown Western funded NGOs like Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch – who are funded in large part by the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) and other CIA and State Department fronts as well as by billionaires like George Soros, whose interests are those of the world’s corporate elite – can only be described as exemplary compared to how the West would have acted under similar circumstances and a reversed tables scenario.
Russia, of course, is not the only country to have adopted such protective measures. Early 2011, Egypt expelled hundreds of people associated with foreign-funded NGOs for “instilling dissent and meddling in domestic policies”. In 2008, Venezuela expelled the Director and Deputy Director of Human Rights Watch (HRW) for “meddling in the internal affairs of our country”, which was a direct response to a HRW report that accused the government of Hugo Chavez of “discrimination on political grounds”, “open disregard for the principle of separation of powers” and for attacking “journalists’ freedom of expression, workers’ freedom of association, and civil society’s ability to promote human rights”; criticisms that could be levelled at the US, Canada and the UK with equal validity and, to a lesser extent, at the EU.
The ugly reality is that the double-standard of Western NGOs who see evil abroad but none at home is what has destroyed their credibility. Equally corrosive, the West’s erosion of the separation between civil society and the economic and political establishments has thrown every NGO operating abroad under suspicion. The destruction of the checks and balances of Western democracies in this post 9/11 era of surveillance and censorship under the pretext of fighting terrorism has caused a chronic lack of trust in media and civil society organizations that are too close to Washington or corporate interests, so much so that only 21% of Americans trust their media and fewer than ever donate to NGOs. America’s intolerance towards non-capitalist and non-Western forms of economic and political organization and the conformist attitudes of Western NGOs to Washington’s geopolitical agenda have shattered the world’s good will towards NGOs that see no evil at home but react to every violation of human rights abroad.
These are the unintended consequences of an aggressive policy of hegemony that insists on controlling the destinies and resources of every country on earth and has subsumed most Western NGOs in this grand and corporate dictated geopolitical agenda. What the world understands but Western NGOs and their governments completely ignore is that the vilest and most numerous violations of human rights are committed by corporate interests and are economic in nature or are derived from the greed with which the West pursues global control, causing conflict and hardship worldwide.
In a rare display of self-criticism, Jimmy Carter wrote in a recent article (“A Cruel and Unusual Record”) that the US government’s counterterrorism policies clearly violate at least 10 of the 30 articles written in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and that “as a result, our country can no longer speak with moral authority on these critical issues”.
Having lost its moral authority, the banner of freedom and democracy has passed to Western NGO’s, but as long as they remain indifferent to what happens at home and violations committed in the West under the pretext of fighting terrorism and radicalization are ignored by civil society and actively suppressed by the domestic and international court systems as well as by the UN Human Rights Council, the result can only be a continuing and accelerated deterioration of human rights worldwide, along with the elevation of Western hypocrisy to a new and unprecedented level.
The cancer is spreading from the UN Security Council where anti-terrorism and counter-radicalization resolutions adopted post 9/11 provide the cover governments need to suppress legitimate dissent and to institute evermore intrusive and illegal policies and programs that border on martial law in the US and facilitate gross violations throughout the West and elsewhere. The cancer causing agents, however, are Washington and London who sponsored these resolutions and are responsible for creating two proxy institutions, the Counter Terrorism Committee (CTC) and the Counter Terrorism Executive Directorate (CTED), to carry out their dictates and thus give them international legitimacy for crimes against democracy and the wholesale destruction of human rights.
The West insulates itself from the criticism of NGOs by holding the purse strings and by demanding that open societies are treated differently from closed societies. But in light of the fact that the governments of Western nations are becoming increasingly secretive one can hardly speak of them as being open societies. The US, using Executive Order 13526, and the UK, through its draconian Official Secrets Act, hide more secrets from their people than the governments of closed societies. The impact of their secrecy is also far more consequential than elsewhere because they are the countries that drive the global imperialist agenda.
In addition, they are great at hiding things in plain view and at manipulating the law and the system to create dead ends. And when that fails and determined individuals expose the machinations, violations and crimes of Western governments and suffer serious consequences at the hands of structural violence then both national and international courts shut down like clams and refuse to process lawsuits directed at Western nations. The rule of law therefore does not apply to Western nations and the freedom and democracy the West promotes are but delusions of a terminally ill, hopelessly dishonest and utterly lawless New World Order delegated from Washington and London.
In this new global environment NGOs have a dual and contradictory political role. On the positive side they criticize authoritarian regimes and expose human rights violations, while on the negative side they obscure the profound class divisions and economic exploitation of neoliberal economies to channel political dissent abroad into dependent relations on the dominant neo-liberal elites at home. As such, they no longer represent a Third Way between “authoritarian statism” and “savage market capitalism”, as they like to assert, but a forward assault team for the corporate/banking power structure of imperialist hegemony. The so-called ‘democratic transition’ they are entrusted with is a euphemism for neo-imperialist expansion and the final disenfranchisement of the people they purportedly want to help to freedom but whom they instead saddle with a new type of social and economic colonialism.
Professor James Petras explains that once NGOs achieve a country’s ‘democratic transition’ they “emphasize projects not movements”, depoliticize and demobilize the poor by diverting “attention from the sources and solutions of poverty”, and reorient “people to produce at the margins not to struggle to control the basic means of production and wealth”, thus preventing them from addressing “the structural conditions that shape their everyday lives”. NGOs have co-opted the language of the Left but linked it “to a framework of collaboration with donors and government agencies that subordinate activity to non-confrontational politics” and ensure that “empowerment never goes beyond small areas of social life with limited resources within the conditions permitted by the neo-liberal state and macro-economy.”3 3 Petras J. (1999) NGO’s In the Service of Imperialism. Journal of Contemporary Asia. Vol. 29, Issue 4.
By then it is too late for peaceful change and the world invariably descends into chaos.
CHAPTER FIVE
THE MEDIA’S COMPLICITY IN CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY
For over 65 years, the media has remained silent with respect to the eugenic and genocidal methods of population control employed by governments throughout the world under the auspices and impetus of the United Nations and its agencies.
Every now and then, as rarely as a celestial event, ethical individuals have broken rank with the conspiracy of silence only to find their careers come to a sudden end and no one to hear or publish their stories.
John Swinton, former Chief of Staff for the New York Times, took his colleagues by surprise in 1953 when he made the following statement at the New York Press Club:
"There is no such thing, at this date of the world's history, in America, as an independent press. You know it and I know it. There is not one of you who dares to write your honest opinions, and if you did, you know beforehand that it would never appear in print. I am paid weekly for keeping my honest opinion out of the paper I am connected with. Others of you are paid similar weekly salaries for similar things, and any of you who would be so foolish as to write honest opinions would be out on the streets looking for another job. If I allowed my honest opinions to appear in one issue of my paper, before twenty-four hours my occupation would be gone. The business of the journalists is to destroy the truth; to lie outright; to pervert; to vilify; to fawn at the feet of mammon, and to sell his country and his race for his daily bread. You know it and I know it, and what folly is this toasting an independent press? We are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are the jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our possibilities, and our lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes."
The media prostitutes have only gotten kinkier since 1953 and today’s practitioners not only lack even a modicum of honesty but are complicit in crimes against humanity that are without precedent in their magnitude and indecency. If it were not for the alternative media that has proliferated in the past ten years thanks to the World Wide Web, we would to this day live in a state of complete ignorance and deception.
Common citizens have had to wrestle the truth from the blood-drenched hands of journalists and editors, whose sole concern is to propagate half-truths fed to them wholesale through the narrow pipelines of state or corporate-controlled news agencies that are interested only in manufacturing consent so as to maintain the illusion of democracy and freedom.
The insidious level of complicity between the media and the political and corporate elites has been carefully guarded. David Rockefeller, speaking at the June 1991 Bilderberger meeting in Baden, Germany, expressed his gratitude:
"We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years.
It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries."
What exactly have they been hiding, the innocent readers will ask? What exactly is hiding behind taboo words like the New World Order, world government, the banking elite? What exactly is being discussed in such complete secrecy at Davos, G8, or Security Council meetings? Why are governments that purport to be free, democratic and transparent classify millions of documents while purporting to be public servants acting in the people’s interest? Behind secrecy hides illegality; that much we can guess. But what illegality? We all know that economic and political power has been consolidated at the global level and supranational level, but very few know why and those who do know rather than guess are part of the establishment and are keeping quiet.
Well, I am not part of the establishment but have been able to uncover the truth about the world denied us for so long. The truth is that since the end of World War II peace and stability have been maintained by controlling population growth to avoid a third world war that in the nuclear age would be our last.
To control population growth governments have had to interfere with our reproductive systems and have done so by turning the basic elements of life, water and food, into weapons of mass sterility, which is why one out of five women in the West remain childless compared to one out of thirty in India. I describe the methods they have been using for nearly seven decades, and the new methods they have added to their arsenal, in my first book on the subject, Chemical and Biological Depopulation. 4 4 Galalae KM (2012) Chemical and Biological Depopulation. Lambert Academic Publishers.
In my recently published book, Killing Us Softly: The Global Depopulation Policy 5 , I not only expose for the first time in history the existence of a global depopulation effort and describe its progression, I also assess the damage done by the policy as well as outline its achievements. 5 Galalae KM (2014) Killing Us Softly: The Global Depopulation Policy. Progressive Press.
- 10% of the populations exposed to covert chemical sterilization
I take the liberty of quoting my book:
“THE COST IN HUMAN LIFE
Let us briefly review the cost in human life paid and yet to be paid by the people of this planet as a result of the way in which our leadership, both national and international, have pressed on.
- nearly 2 billion births covertly prevented by chemical, surgical and bacteriological means
- more than 500 million births overtly prevented by legislation and abortion
- more than 300 million genetic lines permanently and irrevocably shut out of procreation
- Japan’s, Europe’s, Russia’s, North America’s, Australia’s and New Zealand’s IQ reduced by 15 to 25 points
- 10% of the populations exposed to covert chemical sterilization methods has been rendered sexually confused
- 10% of all children born in countries subjected to covert chemical sterilization have been condemned to developmental disorders
- 1 out of 5 Western women rendered infertile or childless by a combination of chemical and psychosocial methods of population control; compared to one out of 20 in China and 1 out of 30 in India
- 100% of the populations subjected to chemical fertility control have damaged endocrine systems resulting in chronic illness in at least 25% of these affected populations
- all males subjected to chemical fertility control methods have compromised, substandard sperm
- more than 500 million people have met with premature deaths due to artificially high levels of morbidity and mortality achieved through chemical, biological and bacteriological methods of population control
WHAT HAS BEEN AVERTED
It would be intellectually dishonest of me to pretend that the measures taken by the Global Depopulation Policy have not saved the world from a far worse outcome than what has been sacrificed.
- civilization would have long collapsed had the population been allowed to grow at natural rates and an additional 2 billion people would have been born into the world between 1950 and today
- widespread famine would have destabilized Africa, South America and Asia by the 1980s causing universal misery and suffering of an order of magnitude never experienced in history
- a Western world with a population twice as large as today would have conquered and taken by force the resources of Africa and South America to ensure its own survival and standard of living
- the environmental degradation we face today would have been twice as bad and none of the protected tracts of land that have been set aside over the past 50 years could have been saved from desperate exploitation
- there would have been no peace and prosperity and large areas of the world would have been annihilated by nuclear war
As difficult as it is to admit it, we owe the depopulation lobby our civilization’s survival and our very lives, sickened though they are. More than this, we owe them a world order where consensus not force rules (most times) and where the more humane tools of monetary coercion have replaced the brutal means of military conquest. We owe them peace and prosperity. We also owe them our innocence, for they have allowed us to keep our hands free of blood and our consciences unburdened by guilt.”
What I have not discussed in my book is what will happen if we do not succeed in forcing our governments and the international community to abandon covert chemical and biological poisoning for overt legislation as the means by which to halt and reduce the global population to a sustainable level.
THE TRAGEDY TO COME
The following projections and estimates are for the next one hundred years.
- two out of four women worldwide will be infertile by 2050 and three out of four by 2100
- two billion genetic lines will be terminated by 2050 and four billion by 2100
- the IQ will be lowered worldwide from an average of circa 90 today to an average of 70 by 2050 and 50 by 2100 and mental retardation will be the norm rather than the exception
- half the population will be sexually confused
- half the world’s children will suffer from developmental disorders by 2050
- nine out ten people worldwide will have severely damaged endocrine systems resulting in chronic illness in at least three quarters of the population
- life expectancy will sink from an average of 70 years today to 60 years by 2050 and 50 years by 2100.
- nine out of ten males worldwide will have useless sperm Perhaps the most frightening aspect of this scenario is that hardly anyone alive a century from now will have the intellectual capacity necessary to grasp the immediate reality let alone the historical damage done by the Global Depopulation Policy.
What has taken Nature and God eons of evolution to perfect, man will have destroyed in just two centuries. There is no name yet in the criminal code of any nation to describe the affront to God and Nature caused by the devolution of man by man that the Global Depopulation Policy engenders.
If we want to survive as a species and as a civilization we must all awaken to the bitter truth and confront it without fear or hesitation. The time to change course is now, or we shall be forever lost.
Those in the mainstream media who maintain the code of silence for self serving reasons are sacrificing the wellbeing of their children and their children’s children for their own.
May God forgive them for their sins because their sons and daughters will not!
next
YOU’VE BEEN SCHEDULED FOR ANNIHILATION 35s
No comments:
Post a Comment