Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
by David Kasady and Leaf Garrit
First published April 2, 2019
Politics is all theater, as becomes increasingly apparent with each passing day. Case in point, this
week’s Senate debate and subsequent vote on the Green New Deal resolution. In case you missed
it, here is Senator Mike Lee (R-Utah) arguing against the resolution on the Senate floor:
That is an undoctored photo, the painting depicting President Reagan with a rocket launcher
strapped to his back, riding a velociraptor. So continues the long-running Punch and Judy that is
our federal government. But here’s the thing – the Green New Deal was never meant to be taken
seriously, and both sides know that. The resolution’s sponsor, freshman congresswoman
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), knows it every bit as much as Senator Lee knows it. The
Green New Deal was designed to fail. Why? Because they want to blackwash the 10% of the
resolution that’s really quite admirable by mixing it up with the 90% that’s tripe, and then grossly
mischaracterizing the whole thing for good measure with talk of banning airplanes and
eliminating the worldwide population of farting cows.
If you actually read the resolution, you’ll find a few decent things, like combating industrial
pollution to protect our air and water, supporting family farming and “sustainable farming and
land use practices that increase soil health”, including afforestation and biodiversity
enhancement, “protecting the right of all workers to organize,” stopping eminent domain abuse,
and favoring local businesses over international monopolies. All things Wendell Berry would
approve of. But then there are things like achieving net-zero greenhouse gas emissions to
combat “climate change”, building “smart” power grids (which cause cancer), supporting
“massive growth” in “clean” manufacturing, guaranteeing millions of “good” jobs, and
guaranteeing affordable health care and higher education for everyone. All of this would cost
trillions of tax dollars, of course, and push even greater utilization of the elites’ most profitable
sectors – energy, health care, insurance, and (mis)education. In other words, the Green New Deal
would just enrich the elites while further entrenching everyone in the fascist-capitalist structure.
Anyone with half a brain knows this about the GND. Or should. They should see it is about
throwing the baby out with the bathwater. It is about associating the baby with the bathwater.
Non-exploitation of workers? Dirty communist! Care for our rivers and forests? Lousy socialist!
Distrust of the mega-corporations and their toxic products? Evil Marxist!
But I’m not here to talk about the GND. I’m here to out Miss Ocasio-Cortez, a.k.a. AOC, which
is not hard to do. She is just a continuation of the Bernie Sanders project to delegitimize real
protest movements, having been a member of his campaign team. Like Sanders, she is also a
member of the Families, which I will cover. But as usual, she is just the gateway to more
interesting things.
For starters, AOC’s story is unbelievable. On Wikipedia we’re told she was born in the Bronx to
a poor family of Puerto Rican immigrants, working her way up from obscurity to become the
youngest woman ever to serve in the U.S. Congress. If you think that’s even remotely possible,
you’ve been successfully brainwashed. As we’ve seen again and again, every politician,
celebrity, artist, scientist, and entrepreneur in this world has been chosen for their role, appointed
by the ruling Families to which they belong. Their tales are churned out from the bowels of
Langley, which explains why they’re so out of touch with reality. Exhibit A, her first claim to
fame:
She came in second in the Microbiology category of the Intel International Science and
Engineering Fair [ISEF] with a microbiology research project on the effect of
antioxidants on the lifespan of the nematode C. elegans. In a show of appreciation for her
efforts, the MIT Lincoln Laboratory named a small asteroid after her: 23238 OcasioCortez.
None of that scans, does it? The MIT Lincoln Laboratory is a research and development center
chartered by the U.S. Department of Defense to “apply advanced technology to problems of
national security.” Why would they be so appreciative of a high schooler’s science project about
what antioxidants do to a microscopic worm? It doesn’t have anything to do with national
security, does it? And her project didn’t even get first prize in its category! Has MIT ever named
an asteroid after anyone you know who won second place at a high school science fair? Her
project was also very specific, indicating she was aware of previous research that had been done
on the C. elegans. So she must have already been narrowing in on the field of microbiology as a
high schooler, right? Nope. She ended up going to Boston University as an international
relations and economics major. Wait—what? With PhD-level research under her belt and MIT
already fawning over her, she could have skated into virtually any undergrad science program in
the country on a full scholarship. But she decided to throw all that out the window to pursue
international relations and economics? Remember, she was supposedly from a poor immigrant
family. Pretty much the only way poor kids from the Bronx can afford a school like BU is on a
full scholarship. And they don’t get full rides majoring in international relations. That’s a major
for trust-fund kids whose way is already smoothly paved and who therefore don’t need to study
anything remotely practical.
Actually, we’re told she did enroll at BU “on a scholarship from Intel [the tech company, not the
spooks],” but strange that Intel wouldn’t require their scholarship recipients to major in science,
isn’t it? That’s because ISEF participants aren’t awarded scholarships at all. They’re simply
given cash prizes, the highest two being $75,000 and $50,000. Those are only for Best in
Category winners. AOC only got second place. The most she could have won is $3,000, which
is about enough to cover a week’s worth of tuition at BU. So AOC getting into BU “on a
scholarship from Intel” is not only inaccurate, it’s completely bogus. I assume she did have
everything paid by Intel, but the other Intel. The CIA. Remember, the DoD named asteroid
23238 after her. (And yes, those numbers add up to 18.) That was their way of appointing her.
My guess is she had nothing to do with her research project on nematodes and knows exactly zip
about them.
Miles: we get conflicting stories, since Wiki says she attended BU on a full fellowship from the
National Hispanic Institute. Which is it?
Next, we’re told AOC served as an intern in the foreign affairs and immigration office under
Senator Ted Kennedy. How she landed this coveted internship is anyone’s guess. Incredibly, she
was the only person there who could speak Spanish. So she had to single handedly answer all
those phone calls from Hispanic illegals wondering what ICE did with their loved ones. That’s
what gave her such a passion for immigration reform, of course. I couldn’t make this up if I tried.
After college, AOC moved back to the Bronx and took on three jobs – educational director,
bartender, and waitress – to help her now-widowed mother avoid home foreclosure. Sob, weep,
wipe. Only problem is, we’re told her family moved out of the Bronx when she was 5, to a
house in Yorktown Heights, Westchester County. Yorktown Heights is a wealthy suburb north of
NYC, being 90% white with a median family income around $140,000. How did her mom end
up back in the Bronx fighting foreclosure? The question of where she actually lived prior to her
election is still unanswered. Her Statement of Candidacy is no help, since it lists the address of
her campaign committee – a Knoxville, TN address – as her personal address. Illegal. By the
way, living in the same state in which you’re running is a minimum requirement enforced by the
Federal Election Commission. So double illegal. How did the FEC ever approve her candidacy
without being supplied a New York address? It looks to me like she never lived in the Bronx.
They only later inserted that bit into her bio to make her appear more “one of us” to the district
she was preselected to represent.
Anyhow, after her fake time spent in the Bronx fighting a fake foreclosure, she moved up in the
world pretty quickly, becoming lead educational strategist at GAGEis, Inc. while also launching
her own publishing company, Brook Avenue Press, and working for the National Hispanic
Institute. She even served as Educational Director of the 2017 Northeast Collegiate World Series,
where she also participated in the panel on the future of Latino leadership. Amidst having a fulltime job and several part-time jobs, running a publishing firm, and so on, she also found time to
be an organizer for Bernie Sanders’ presidential campaign, traveling across America by car and
speaking to people impacted by the Flint water crisis and Standing Rock protests. Oi Vey! Is she
twins? Triplets? She also partnered with Sunshine Bronx Business Incubator to design curricula
for aspiring entrepreneurs. How did she manage to do all that? Maybe she took a really stellar
time management course at the local community college between her bartending shifts.
As it turns out, she probably didn’t do all that. Most of the companies she worked for or with
before becoming a Congresswoman appear to be little more than shells and fronts. Brook Avenue Press apparently no longer exists, and never actually published any books. Sunshine Bronx Business Incubator is also defunct. Same with GAGEis. The latter two were founded by Cheni Yerushalmi, shown below, making a spook hand gesture. Miles has shown that “I” isn't ISIS, it
is Intelligence.
Yerushalmi is a shady “Israeli entrepreneur” who likes to attend burlesque yacht parties with Goldman Sachs execs and whose entire career seems to be a front. Everyone calls him “Israeli”
even though he lives in Vermont.* Why not just call him a Wank? Note the thumb ring and the
leather vest with no shirt. (Don’t worry, I’ll get to the Jewish thing in a bit.) But anyway, he
looks like just the sort of guy you would want to work for, right, and put on your resume. Also
see Sunshine Suites, which Cheni has been selling since 2010 as a haven for small business in
Manhattan. Yes, Cheni looks like just the sort of guy that is very worried about small business
owners, doesn't he? Nothing fishy about that. See this this youtube video from 2010, where he is
being interviewed on the subject. It's a worth a laugh, since he sounds like he is doing an
impression of DeNiro doing an impression of a Russian/Jewish/NewYorkese mobster. He is not
convincing in his part here, and they should hire him instead to play a Putin mafia head in some
new Hollywood movie. In that he might shine. As it is, he might as well have a sign around his
neck that says CIA/Mossad front. Which leads us to ask why Republican National party goons
haven't already questioned AOC's ties to this guy. One look at him is enough to immediately
blackwash her resume. I will tell you why the Republicans are silent on this: it is outside the
rules. The Republican/Democrat fights are all scripted on minor points, and they don't wish
anyone to realize that both parties are funded and run by the same trillionaire families. They
don't wish you to look too closely at Cheni (or at anyone else), because if you do you eventually
understand that all of politics is a front. AOC is a better frontwoman, since her spiel doesn't
immediately break down in the first minute. But in the end she is from the same mould as Cheni,
and the same Families. Which is why he found her a job or two.
*That's because Yerushalmi is just a variant spelling of Jerusalem, of course. It would appear that Cheni's grandfather or great-uncle was Yosef Yerushalmi, rabbi and Jewish history prof at Columbia.
If you’re not laughing yet, get ready. After (not) doing all of this, AOC was apparently still broke
and having to bartend and wait tables at a taqueria when he she decided to launch her
“grassroots” congressional campaign in 2018. She told Bon Appétit magazine, “For 80 percent of
this campaign, I operated out of a paper grocery bag hidden behind that bar.” Anyone who has
ever bartender or waited tables knows that’s literally impossible. You think she was cold-calling
donors and maintaining fundraising spreadsheets between pouring shots? That’s absurd. It
becomes more absurd now that we know AOC basically ran the Justice Democrats PAC while
simultaneously supporting her primary campaign. So AOC helped raise nearly $2 million and get
26 candidates across the country elected out of a grocery bag behind the bar. Incroyable! By the
way, operating a PAC that endorses your own political campaign is a massive violation of
campaign law. Of course, sites like Fox News and the Daily Caller want you to think that is the
real crime. But once you realize the entire election process is a sham and that all political offices
are sinecures, getting huffy about breaking campaign rules is sort of missing the forest for the
trees.
AOC’s dad is more or less a ghost. Sergio Ocasio-Roman, who died of cancer in 2008, founded
an architecture firm in the early 1980s called Kirschenbaum Ocasio-Roman, Pc. The company
is now defunct, though it’s not clear why, since there was obviously another partner listed in the
name who could have kept the business going after Sergio’s death. But we know nothing of this
Kirschenbaum, except that he was Jewish, of course. (See, for instance, Jewish comedian Fred
Kirschenbaum.) The media loves to dredge up the fact that AOC’s dad was the CEO of an
architectural firm as proof that she grew up wealthy. On the contrary, the business was listed as
having annual revenues of $500,000 and six employees. After payroll, taxes, and keeping the
lights on, that would pretty much leave them in the hole. It certainly wouldn’t leave enough for
Sergio to afford a house in Westchester County. So the truth is even fishier than the fiction.
Clearly, Kirschenbaum Ocasio-Roman is another shell company. If you look up its former
address, 1510 Archer Road, Bronx, NY, you get a nondescript apartment building with no
businesses listed. So Sergio ran his architectural firm for 25 years out of an apartment? Kind of
like AOC running a PAC out of a paper bag. [I like the sense of humor DC]
Now for the interesting stuff. AOC already admits she has Sephardic Jewish ancestry, though she
has passed it off in interviews as a very distant bloodline. AOC insists she is from a long line of
Catholics. But on geni.com we find her grandmother listed as Thamar Neirida Ocasio.
Thamar/Tamar is a Hebrew name of course, and not the common kind like Ruth or Naomi. So
AOC’s Jewish heritage isn’t very distant. Neirida is also Jewish, linking us to Pablo Neruda, etc.
Then we hit the name Pérez, a common Marrano name we’ve covered before, linking to Perry,
Pereira, Peron, Pinon, Penn, and Pierce. From the Alamo paper you may remember our friend
Ephraim Lópes Pereira d'Aguilar, 2nd Baron d'Aguilar, Jewish-English merchant and financier.
His grandfather was from Lisbon, where he held the monopoly on all tobacco production and
exports, though it’s never explained how he got this monopoly. Ephraim later held the tobacco
monopoly in Vienna, where he was so successful that the Empress of Austria Maria Theresa
made him her personal treasurer. That blatantly contradicts what we are told at Wikipedia, that
“she was probably the most anti-Jewish monarch of her time.” From this genealogy, you can see
the spread of the d’Aguilar family into India, Ireland, the U.S., and Jamaica. So there is evidence
these d’Aguilars made it to the Caribbean. More on that below. They also married into several
top families along the way, including the Stewarts, Fitzgeralds, Jacksons, Popes, Goldsmids
(Goldsmiths), Burtons, Crookshanks, Bacons, Barrows (anglicized form of Baruh/Baruch,
Jewish), Langleys, Myers (Jewish), and the Jewish Lousadas, Dukes of Lousada. The Lousadas
were also in Jamaica, where they owned many sugar plantations. But they were based in
England, where they lived at Peak House in Sidmouth, Devon:
The Lousadas were also Guzmans (Jewish) and Saavedras (also Jewish). This ties into the Alamo
paper again, where we saw Don Quixote author Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra outed as a
crypto-Jew. Cervantes had a love affair with a woman named Josefina Catalina de Parez, whose
granddaughter married a Sotomayor in Puerto Rico. We also learned that Supreme Court Justice
Sonia Sotomayor is a Puerto Rican Jew who is also a Cortes. Which of course brings us back to
Puerto Rican Jew Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. All these same Marrano names popping up in all
the same places! We can also loop in Hernán Cortés, the famous Spanish explorer of Mexico,
who was related to fellow explorer Álvaro de Saavedra.
On barrow-lousada.org we find that the Lousadas emigrated to Australia and intermarried with
the Sephardic Montefiore banking family (relatives of the Rothschilds), where they had a hand
in the Rum Rebellion, the founding of South Australia, the ANZ Bank, and the Victorian gold
rushes. So pretty much every spooky and exploitive event in that country’s early colonial history.
They did the same thing in the U.S. Judith d’Aguilar Lousada’s second cousin was Isaac Touro, a Portuguese Sephardic Jew born in Amsterdam who moved to Jamaica in 1758.
After Jamaica, he settled in Newport, Rhode Island, where he founded the Touro Synagogue, the
oldest synagogue in America. George Washington was pals with Touro and visited his synagogue
in 1790. So it was a spook hangout (plus, GW was Jewish). Isaac’s son Judah co-founded
Boston’s first bank, Massachusetts Bank, with his brother-in-law Moses Michael Hays, also
Jewish. (Hays also helped establish the Masonic movement in New England, becoming Grand
Master of the Massachusetts Lodge and naming Paul Revere as his Deputy. The Hays family
later intermarried with the Rothschilds, Levinson's, Cohens, and Ochs/Sulzbergers – see Arthur
Hays Sulzberger, publisher of the New York Times. The Hayses themselves were descended from
the Jewish Adolphus family from Germany, lending even more credence to Hitler’s
Jewishness.) Massachusetts Bank financed the first voyage of an American ship to Argentina,
where it soon established a foreign headquarters in Buenos Aires as the Bank of Boston. From
there it became the largest foreign bank in several major Latin American cities. Wikipedia admits
the bank was unaffected by the Wall Street Crash of 1929. What they don’t admit is that all the
big banks profited from the crash. That was the point.
We’re told the bank’s Buenos Aires headquarters were blown up on Christmas Eve 1927 by
Italian anarchist Severino Di Giovanni. We can immediately out that as a staged event based on
his name. Again going back to the Alamo paper, we know that Mexican President Santa Anna
was a Severino, as well as a López and a Pérez. Severino is also a peerage name, linked to the
Livingstons (a.k.a. Levinsons – see the Hays connection above), Cliffords, and Stuarts. Here is a
photo of Di Giovanni being taken to court:
That’s a paste-up. Several of the men are leaning so much in various directions that they all look
as if they’re about to fall over. And they are all looking at the camera when they would naturally
be watching Di Giovanni being escorted across the room. None of them seem remotely aware of
him at all. That’s because he was pasted in later. There is no picture of him in court, because he
was never in court. He was never on trial, either, and he was never executed. We’re told he was
put on military trial, despite the fact that he was not in the military. His appointed defense
attorney, Lieutenant Juan Carlos Franco, did such a good job defending him that Franco himself
was imprisoned and then deported! Yeah, right. Di Giovanni was just controlled opposition.
Same with his anarchist buddy Alejandro Scarfó, who was imprisoned for attempting to
assassinate President-elect Hoover in 1928 but was released a mere six years later and magically
never heard from again. The things they expect you to believe!
We’ve established that the Pereira/d’Aguilar/Lousada family made it to the Caribbean, where
they owned several sugar plantations, particularly in Kingston, Jamaica. We can assume they
were also the Jews that ran all of the piracy out of Kingston, as we learned in the Jewish Pirates paper. But can we link them more directly to Puerto Rico, and thus to AOC? Since they settled at
both ends of the Caribbean – Barbados and Jamaica – we can assume they settled in the central
islands as well. Indeed, we find a Sarah Aimee d’Aguilar, daughter of Mordecai and Esther, born
in St. Croix in 1825, marrying Jacob Pereyra y de Leon, and dying in St. Thomas. The de Leons
are another prominent (now admittedly) Jewish family across the Caribbean and the Americas,
which included many explorers – including Juan Ponce de León, who became the first Governor
of Puerto Rico. (Also see Luis Ponce de Leon first Governor of New Spain and friend of
Hernán Cortés, who before his death turned over his governorship to Marcos de Aguilar.)
Miles: I have also linked the de Leons directly to the Perons. See my paper on Hitler's
genealogy, and the section on the Perons. Ponce de Leon the explorer is in Eva Peron's Geni
pages.
We get an even better link to AOC with Sarah Aimee d’Aguilar’s daughter, Hana, who married a
Romondt. Look familiar? That’s just a variant of Roman. Remember that AOC’s father was
Sergio Ocasio-Roman. Now here’s another link: the Pereira/d’Aguilar/Lousada family was
related to the Torres family. Guess what name we find in AOC’s ancestry? Her grandmother
Thamar was nee Román-Torres. So AOC comes from all these Portuguese-Jewish families that
have ruled the Caribbean roost (or at least exploited it) for centuries.
There’s another gem in AOC’s ancestry. That would be the name Betancourt. If you follow
AOC’s Betancourt line on geni.com, you go all the way back to Felix Betancourt, born 1740 in
the Canary Islands. Conveniently, this is the first Betancourt in her line from the Canary Islands
and also the last stop on the train. The line is scrubbed after Felix. Can you guess why?
Bettencourt is a surname and noble family of Norman origin. The head of the family in
the 14th century, Jean de Béthencourt, organized an expedition to conquer the Canary
Islands, resulting in his being made King of the Canary Islands. Though the royal title
would be short-lived, it allowed the family to firmly establish itself afterwards in the
Azores and Madeira islands. The family is one of the most expansive and established
families of the Portuguese nobility.
Why did he sign up for the Canary Islands expedition? I’m glad you asked: “Béthencourt
possessed textile factories and dye works and the Canaries offered a source of dyes such as the orchil lichen.” That pretty much proves the Béthencourts were Jewish. The orchil lichen
produces red-to-purple dye that is used to color wool and silk. Sounds a lot like the dye extracted
from Murex snails to make Tyrian purple, doesn’t it? You know what that means. The
Béthencourts were Phoenicians! They’ve scrubbed AOC’s genealogy beyond Felix for that very
reason – it would link her not only to one of the most renowned Portuguese noble families, but
more importantly to our Phoenician/Jewish crypto-rulers.
This also links AOC to the late L’Oreal heiress and World’s Richest Woman, Liliane Bettencourt
(above), who Miles touched on in his Spotlight paper. Wikipedia admits that Liliane’s husband
André was a descendent of Jean de Béthencourt. They try to paint André as antisemitic, but he
was just plain Semitic. If we revisit the Spotlight paper, we find that journalist Michael Rezendes
descends not only from a Bettencourt, but also a Barreira. Look familiar? That’s just a fudging
of Pereira. Around and around these families go.
There are also Béthencourts/Bittencourts in the peerage, where they are related to the Vaughans,
Earls of Lisburne, and through the Vaughans, the Courtenays (Viscounts of Powderham Castle),
Baronets Palk, Gascoignes, Nightingales, Watsons, Malets, Wilmots (Earls of Rochester),
Hookers (including a Lord Mayor of London), Baronets Prideaux, Lloyds (think Lloyd’s of
London), and Hawleys (Barons of Duncannon), to name a few.
Miles: even better, we find Ramon Betances, the father of Puerto Rico Independence. They sell
him as a big philanthropist, but that is just the usual whitewash. They did the same thing with
Carnegie and the Rockefellers. His family was actually rich sugar barons, Freemasons, and
slavers. They were cryto-Jewish merchants from Spain and France from way back, as usual.
Betances is just a shortening of Betancourt. So AOC doesn't come from poor Puerto Ricans, as
you are told. She comes from Puerto Rican Jewish royalty. Betances' Wiki page is the normal
transparent fiction, where he is sold as a great revolutionary and friend of the people, when what
he was is an agent of the US financial elite, who wished to take control of the islands—which of
course they did.
Also see Romulo Betancourt, President of Venezuela 1945-64, sold as the Father of Venezuelan
Democracy. When what he really was is a J. Edgar Hoover look-alike who was another cloaked
fascist. He rose through the Communist Party, proving he was Jewish. So we already see the
contradiction: he is sold as the father of Democracy, while being a Communist. Communism is
not a variant of Democracy, but its opposite. Communism is just a front for the Industrials and
bankers, and has been since the 1840s and before. Betancourt became President right after the
War by a military coup. Is that the way Democrats normally rise? They admit he overthrew
Angarita, who was taxing the oil companies 60%. We are told Betancourt lowered it to 50/50,
though that is also a fudge. But you can already see he was a stooge of the oil companies, just as
you would expect. They are the ones who really run these countries, not the paper mache
Presidents. To avert real revolution, he was instructed to pretend to nationalize oil refinery, just
as they were pretending to nationalize the banks in the UK, US, and elsewhere. But it was all a
smokescreen in both cases. Nothing was actually nationalized, and most of the profits continued
to go to the trillionaire Families.
If we switch over to geneanet.org, we find a Juan Ocasio-Roman born 1740 in Arecibo, Puerto
Rico – same hometown as AOC’s family. Interestingly, this line is scrubbed after another Felix,
this time Felix Ocasio rather than Felix Betancourt. But this Felix Ocasio married a Mariana
Gonzalez de Vetancurt, which of course is just a variant of Betancourt. So we’ve definitely found
AOC’s ancestors here. Can we find any more interesting family links on geneanet? You bet. This
Mariana Vetancurt’s mother was a Miranda, another prominent family closely related to the
Lousada Dukes. So we can further confirm AOC’s link to the Lousadas/d’Aguilars/Pereiras. Juan
Ocasio-Roman’s sister Micaela married Leon Román de Soto. So we can also confirm the de
Leon link, as well as link to another Spanish explorer – Hernando de Soto. We can strengthen
that link if we flip back to AOC’s genealogy at geni.com, where we find her relative Eugenia Román marrying a Wenceslae Diaz Soto. Is there a crypto-Jewish conquistador that AOC isn’t
related to?
As if the web of AOC’s ancestors isn’t tangled enough, we can throw one more name into the
mix: Franco. We already hit this name above, with fake terrorist Severino Di Giovanni’s defense
attorney, Lt. Franco. Remember that Di Giovanni supposedly bombed the headquarters of Bank
of Boston, which was founded by a Touro/Lousada. It turns out the Lousadas were related to the Francos, who appear to be another prominent Jewish family with names like Moses and
Abraham. Here’s a painting of Raphael Franco, who married one of Baron d’Aguilar’s daughters:
Now we know why Lt. Franco was assigned to defend the fake bank bomber: he was a relative of
the bank’s founders, and it was a project being run from the inside. We can link the Francos to
AOC’s ancestors again through Ulysses Cruz de Aguiar Cortez, Portugal’s Minister of Finance
from 1965 to ’68. (See, they just took the ‘l’ out of Aguilar.) He married Maria Helena Franco
Bebiano Correia, who came from a family of Portuguese viscounts. Also notice the name
Correia, which links us back to Chief Justice Sotomayor, who was a Correa, and through
Sotomayor to every other person we’ve stumbled across in this paper.
The interesting bit about that Franco portrait is its ownership. It belonged to Doris Duke, the
American socialite and heiress to the American Tobacco Company fortune. American Tobacco
was the largest cigarette manufacturer in the world and held the monopoly on the U.S. tobacco
market, which should remind you of the d’Aguilars, who first made their fortunes the same way,
holding the tobacco monopolies in both Spain and Austria. The painting hung in Doris’ Rough
Point mansion in Newport, Rhode Island, where we already saw the Touros having settled. Doris
purchased the painting in a Christie’s auction of the estate of one of the Earls of Morton, who
were of the Douglas clan, one of the top spook families going back centuries. The wife of the
16th Earl of Morton was Susan Yarde Buller, a relative of Raphael Franco, which explains why
his portrait fell into the Earl of Morton’s estate. So the portrait proves a family link between the
d’Aguilars/Lousadas/Pereiras/Touros and the Douglases, which thus links them to every other
family in the British peerage. Susan Buller was also related to the Earls of Bathurst. Doris was an
avid art collector, which would seem to explain why she purchased the Franco portrait, but
seeing that she was the daughter of a tobacco tycoon and lived in Newport, I’d say the real
reason she purchased the Franco painting was because she was also related to Franco somehow.
It turns out that “somehow” is not very hard to figure out. Doris’ descendants were the Dukes of
Barbados, including Henry Duke, Solicitor-General of Barbados, and William Raleigh Duke,
clerk of the Barbados Assembly, whose wife’s name was Thamar Taylor. Two Thamars in one
paper! Here is the picture of her provided at geni.com:
We’re told she was a Cherokee Indian, but since her maiden name was Taylor and her parents are
totally scrubbed on every site, I’d say she was half-Cherokee at best, if at all. That painting may
just be complete misdirection.
Anyhow, we can assume Doris Duke’s ancestors were hobnobbing with Franco’s many relatives
down in the Caribbean. Here we also learn of a Catharine Prideaux Duke, related to the Barbados
Dukes and the prominent Prideaux family of Devon. Edmund Prideaux was Oliver Cromwell’s
Attorney General. That explains why Doris Duke married a Cromwell. But notice Prideaux, a
name we have already seen in this paper, being related through the Vaughans to the…
Bittencourts!
You can also find Francos in the peerage. Sir Ralph Lopes, 2nd Baronet, was the son of Abraham
Franco and Esther Lopes. His uncle, Manasseh Lopes, was a wealthy Portuguese Jew born in
Jamaica. Ralph’s grandmother was Rebecca Pereira. Ralph’s grandson was Henry Yarde Buller
Lopes, 1st Baron Roborough. They lived at Maristow House in Devon.
That’s the third time Devon has come up in this paper, if anyone’s counting.
Of course, the name Franco pulls actor James Franco into the mix. They admit James is Jewish
on his mother’s side, but they hide the fact that his “Portuguese” father was Sephardic Jewish.
We know this now that we’ve seen Jewish Francos, like our friend Raphael above. They also
admit that James’s Franco line goes back not to mainland Portugal, but to the Madeira islands,
where we now know that the – who else? – Bettencourts have had a stronghold for centuries. So
AOC and James Franco are probably cousins multiple times over.
Miles: in case you missed it, that also ties us to Generalissimo Francisco Franco, who—yes—is
still dead. As far as we know. And it means that, like Castro, Mussolini, Hitler, Lenin,
Eichmann, Hess, Goebbels, and Himmler, Franco was also Jewish.
In closing, I happened to re-read Miles’ paper on Ben Franklin this week and noticed a lot of tie ins. For one, our boy Ben was related to the Douglases, Earls of Morton. This helped me uncover
another connection: the granddaughter of the 7th Earl of Morton was Mary Hay, of the Earls of
Errol. Hays is likely a variant of Hay. Remember, the Jewish Hayses were related through the
Touros and Lousadas to the Francos, who were in turn related to the Earls of Morton. So we have
a nice closed loop there, linking the Jewish Hayses to the Hays of the peerage. The Douglases
were close relatives of the Stewarts/Stuarts, who we have already seen marrying d’Aguilars and
Severinos. We also learned that Ben Franklin’s relatives had ties to the Caribbean; they were
wealthy landowners in Barbados. We also know that Ben was related to Saunders, which is
why he published Poor Richard’s Almanack under the pseudonym Richard Saunders. That
explains how AOC got her start as a campaign organizer for Bernie Sanders, a.k.a. Saunders.
And finally, remember Senator Mike Lee mocking the Green New Deal with his Reagan on a raptor prop? Well, we learned that Ben Franklin was related to the Earls of Lichfield, who
were…Lees.
Miles: Well, my guest writers did a heck of a job, as usual. I didn't even know who AOC was
when this paper was sent in, since I don't follow the fake world anymore, except when someone
asks me for analysis. At that point I roll out of bed and dive into the internet, unwinding the
deception like a logical alien who had just landed would do. In that sense I am more like Mr.
Spock than Sherlock Holmes. Anyway, I can understand the draw of AOC. She is young, pretty,
and mostly says the right things. Thirty years ago I would have been all over her. But now I see
right through her. David and Leaf are absolutely correct in their conclusion, since she reeks of
controlled opposition. The Science Fair story is another bad creation of Langley, and we should
demand to see the project, the ISEF rolls for that year, and the reports. It is never explained why
LINEAR would name an asteroid for a highschool girl, in honor of her project on worms. We
must assume a ranking person in the lab is a close relative.
Plus, if we check the page for that asteroid, we find that it was discovered in 2000, when AOC
was eleven years old. Even worse, we see that this asteroid 2000 WU111=asteroid 1992 UB9,
which indicates it was actually discovered in 1992, when AOC was three years old. They just
“rediscovered” it in 2000, giving it the spook WU111 designation. As in wuwu 111. Although
we aren't given a date of naming, they couldn't have named it for her before about 2009-2010,
when she would have been a senior. So it just sat there without a name for 18 years, until
someone spotted this pretty hispanic girl at a science fair? Are we supposed to believe these
astronomers were hanging out at a high school science fair, checking out the young female talent?
Sort of creepy, isn't it?
To dodge that, we are told a female scientist Rachel Evans at LINEAR named it for her. To me
that doesn't make it any less creepy, since we have no way to know Evans wasn't stalking her.
Plus, again, the dates don't match. The story is Evans and her boss Stokes had naming rights to
all these asteroids—which makes no sense on its own—but since the asteroid was allegedly
discovered in 2000, and they were naming these asteroids after Science Fair winners, why didn't
they name it after the 2000 or 2001 winner? Or the 1999 winner? Or any winner back to 1900?
How could they name the 2000 asteroid after a girl who was 11 years old at the time and had
never entered a Science Fair? They were just waiting ten years to find the second-place winner
with the right ass?
Her links to Lorenzo de Zavala (LDZ) through the National Hispanic Institute are also suspect,
and my guest writers skipped that. This is a big clue as to who she really is, and I recommend
Zavala's Wiki page as another cold shower here. Note that he worked for the Cortes legislature
in Madrid. Cortes=Cortez. So he is a famous ancestor of AOC. Zavala's page neglects to list his
mother and her maiden name, which is the usual clue. But we find her listed as Barbara Saenz here.Not a very hispanic name, is it? The first Google result on “Saenz Jewish” takes us here, where we find Rabbi de Leon informing Louie Saenz of his Jewish heritage. The name is a
variant of the Jewish name Zaentz, as in producer Saul Zaentz. It is also useful to look at Zavala's descendants: Adler, Bowers, Rodman, Hutchinson, Dailey, Fahney, Morehead, Wadzick,
Weaver, Harmon. Zavala became Minister of Finance in the first Republic of Mexico, indicating
he was from a family of bankers. He was a famous freemason. He was the first to sign the
Mexican Constitution. You may think he was a great patriot, but it was just the opposite. In the
troubles of 1829, he was at first arrested, but then somehow escaped to New York City. Why?
His bio doesn't bother to tell you, but the reason is that he was major crook. The treasury was
found to be empty, for one thing. So it is the revolutionaries who had arrested Zavala. Of course
Zavala's pal Santa Anna soon came in (1832) and quashed all hope for the people of Mexico by
declaring himself dictator. But that is another story.
Anyway, we are supposed to believe that Zavala withdrew support from Santa Anna for his
nefarious ways, but history has been rewritten. Zavala was actually one of Santa Anna's top
appointees once he took over. Zavala later left for Texas, but not because he was too liberal for
Santa Anna. Rather, he was seeking his own country to rule. Zavala had an Empresario Grant
from Santa Anna, so the idea they were enemies is ludicrous. This grant was millions of acres of
land, so we know Zavala was the equivalent of a billionaire. This is where we get into the whole
faked War of Texas Independence which my guest writers have already covered. Soon after
“Independence” in 1836, Zavala faked his death at age 48, in part to hide the fact that Texas was
still being run by Jewish billionaires. It still is. Except that they are now trillionaires.
So it should look mighty strange to you that Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez was an LDZ bigwig both
in highschool and college. Also interesting is that one of the founders of the National Hispanic
Institute is Gloria de Leon. David and Leaf just showed you that AOC is closely related to the de
Leons, so we appear to have more evidence of pretty bold nepotism. Many of the other founders
and key people of NHI also throw up immediate red flags, with surnames Nieto, Ballesteros,
Cordova, and Cota. So my guess is the NHI isn't promoting your run-of-the-mill hispanics here,
based only on merit. It appears to be promoting Marranos and family members. Big surprise,
right? There are laws against this sort of nepotism, but they aren't enforced. Who would enforce
them? The Justice Department is run by their relatives.
Some readers still won't understand why we would attack AOC, apparently one of the most
progressive members of Congress. Why not attack the furthest right members, instead of the
furthest left? Because, as David and Leaf pointed out above, it is all a charade. No one in
Congress is really anything left or right. They are all simply bought. They create a division and
a diversion, to keep your eyes off the real action. In reality, Congress does nothing but
rubber stamp military and spy budgets, and look the other way while the bankers suck from the
treasury. A few people like AOC are planted to give hope to the naïve, making them think
Congress can make a difference or that it can be an agent of positive change. It can't. I believe
in the possibility of positive change, but not through the standing institutions. You should have
learned by now that they are corrupt beyond all hope. They are owned in toto by the ruling families, and what we have shown you about AOC just confirms that for the millionth time.
Meaningful change will never be possible until you give up hope on Congress, the President, the
political parties, the mainstream media, and the entire entrenched machine. It is all a mirage, set
up to keep you constantly running after water that is simply not there.
First you have to disengage yourself from the Matrix, and then you have to actively resist it. You
cannot do that by slobbering after young phonies like AOC. She is the false Siren, singing you
the song you wish to hear to keep you asleep or tied to the mast. So your first order of business
is telling her and those who promote her to take a leap. Tell them you are not fooled. And then
get on with it. Do not try to petition them for anything, since that is just a waste of time. Walk
around them. Shun them. Bankrupt them. Do not work for them or with them. And demand
they return the quadrillions of dollars they have stolen from you and your parents and
grandparents, which they have squirreled away all over the world. That money is not on another
planet or in another dimension. It can easily be taken back, given the will to do so. Once we
have that money back in our hands, we can talk about what good to do with it. Until then, it is
all blah blah.
If you are waiting around for Congress to start taxing the rich again, good luck with that. I can
tell you whose taxes will rise with AOC's European Socialism plan: yours, not the wealthy's.
First they will outsource your garbage collection to “China”, billing you triple for it. Then they
will turn all your roads into toll roads—outsourced to “India” or “Saudi Arabia”. Then they will
outsource your muni water from Northern Canada, where it will have to be piped in from the
tundra, sextupling your bill. Then they will carbon-tax your meat, to offset the methane release
of those pesky animals. Then they will tax all paper, to offset the environmental pollution caused
by trees (see Reagan's claim that trees were the world's largest polluters). Then they will tax
your toilet—though they will call it a “commode registration” or something. It has already been
proven these people will never stop, and that the only one who can say stop is you. So you might
as well say it now.
Some will tell me this revolution will never come, and possibly it won't. But you don't have to
wait for a majority to wake up. Wake up and shake yourself now, since you can revolutionize
your own life to any extent you wish, as soon as you wish. As Thoreau told us, change requires
no majority. It requires no vote, no union, no group of any size. You yourself are a sovereign
entity, one that cannot ultimately be forced. You can be fooled, bluffed, hoaxed, and even
squashed, but you cannot be forced to act. Anything you do takes your decided participation.
Even at gunpoint, you have to say OK. Don't say OK. Don't participate. Like Bartleby, just say,
“I prefer not to”. You don't have to justify your position beyond that. I don't think they will
shoot you, but if they do, just come back in your next life and cause them twice as much trouble.
And remember what Obi-wan said: “If you strike me down, I shall become more powerful than
you can possibly imagine”. No, I am not joking.
No comments:
Post a Comment