THE HALLIBURTON AGENDA
The Politics of Oil and Money
By Dan Briody
The Politics of Oil and Money
By Dan Briody
6
Our Man in Office
“I have some money that I want to know what to do with . . . I
was wondering . . . just who should be getting it, and I will
be collecting more from time to time.” This generous offer was
made by George Brown to Lyndon Johnson in January 1960.
This transcript of a phone call, placed after more than two
decades of what ultimately amounted to illegal campaign contributions to Johnson and his colleagues, demonstrates just
how committed the Browns were to their favorite politician.
Even after millions of dollars had been raised on Johnson’s behalf, the Browns were still willing and able to give.
The Browns understood something about the politics of
their day that few of their competitors recognized. To really
get your money’s worth out of a politician, you have to go all
out. Lumping money into a crowded pot gets you nowhere. To
really get things done in Washington, you can’t just support
your politician—you have to own your politician. “They would
contribute substantially as hell if their friend, somebody who had helped them, had a political campaign,” recalled Ed
Clark, longtime Brown & Root attorney. Johnson knew that
without Herman Brown’s money, he would never achieve the
one thing he had always dreamed of: becoming president of
the United States. Johnson knew this because Brown continually reminded him of the power of his money by meeting Johnson’s every financial need. And Brown insisted that Johnson
provide a return on his investment by keeping the contracts
coming. In fact, taking one look at his voting record on issues
like labor laws, corporate taxes, and government regulation
made it relatively easy to see that Johnson was working for
Brown & Root, not the people of his district or the state. Another indicator was the history of giant and costly public works
programs that Johnson had fought to bring to Texas, which inevitably included Brown & Root as the contractor.
Though the world could see what Johnson was doing for
Brown & Root, it was considerably more difficult to see what
Brown & Root was doing for Johnson. People familiar with the
relationship suspected that money must be changing hands.
But few in the laissez-faire political environment of Texas
cared enough to follow up on it. It was accepted as the way
business was done. Mostly though, Texans just wanted to get in
on the action. Other politicians in the state came to know that
Lyndon Johnson was the man to see to get some of Herman
Brown’s money. Businessmen in the state knew that the way to
get political influence was through Herman Brown. If anything was getting done in 1940s Texas, it was going to have to
go through either Johnson or Brown, the most powerful team
in the state.
•••
Herman Brown missed out on the opportunity to fund Johnson’s first campaign for Congress in 1937, but he would
make up for it quickly in subsequent years. After Johnson
won the congressional seat in the Tenth District, he immediately went to work for the Browns, securing them work
on the Mansfield Dam, then ramming through successive
increases in the contract. The Browns were, of course, very
appreciative and eager to show their newly elected representative some gratitude. When Johnson ran for reelection in
1938, Herman Brown persuaded his subcontractors, lawyers,
suppliers, workers . . . anyone making money from the Brown
& Root machine to support, both financially and electively,
the candidate. Lyndon Johnson had as much money as he
could spend at his disposal. And he never had a problem getting reelected to Congress again after that.
In addition to the money that Herman Brown contributed
to Johnson for his congressional reelection, Brown donated
heavily to Johnson’s allies throughout the country. In October
1940, after a whirlwind month of arm-twisting and political
back-scratching, Lyndon Johnson won an informal role advising the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.
The position gave Johnson a new national profile, and put
him in a position to help Democratic candidates for Congress
all over the country. He immediately called on Brown & Root.
George Brown had instructed Johnson never to be timid
about asking for favors. Timidity would never again constrain
Lyndon Johnson.
Campaign contributions from corporations were illegal in
1940, meaning that the money would have to come from various individuals working for or associated with Brown & Root,
each contributing a maximum of $5,000. It was a way around the law; often, the money took a circuitous route through various contributors, but it all originated from Brown & Root. It
was just as illegal, but far more difficult for the authorities to
track. On the face of it, the contributions looked like individual donations.
The money began to pour in just five days after Johnson had
secured his post on the Committee. In one week, Johnson had
marshaled $30,000 from Brown & Root for the Committee,
more than the Democratic National Committee itself could
drum up. Each contribution included a letter from the donor,
specifically designating the candidate for which the money
was to be used. Those candidates were handpicked by Johnson
himself, many of whom were already actively soliciting Johnson’s help. Letters poured in from desperate Democrats
locked in mortal battle with their GOP opponents. Johnson
made sure to let each of the lucky candidates know that it was
he, not the Committee, who was responsible for their good fortune. Suddenly, dozens of congressional hopefuls found themselves owing Lyndon Johnson, and indirectly Brown & Root,
favors. Herman Brown knew that the more powerful Lyndon
Johnson became, the more powerful he would be as well.
The 1940 election was an overwhelming success for the Democrats. Dozens of congressmen owed their seat in the House
to Johnson, and President Roosevelt himself was eternally grateful for the role Johnson had played in securing a Roosevelt friendly House. Those elections vaulted Johnson into a new role
of national power, with Herman Brown lurking in the shadows
behind him. As Caro bluntly puts it, “[Johnson’s] power base
wasn’t his congressional district, it was Herman Brown’s bank
account.”
The Browns, having benefited from owning a congressman,
knew that aligning with a U.S. senator would be infinitely
more advantageous. The Browns had already begun pushing
Johnson toward a run. As early as May 1939, George Brown was
planting the seed in Johnson’s ambitious brain, writing him, “I
have thought about you often out here and don’t know whether
or not you have made up your mind about what future course
you want to take, but some day in the next few years one of the
old ones [senators] is going to pass on, and if you have decided
to go that route I think it would be ‘gret’ to do it.”
•••
In April 1941, one of the “old ones” did pass on. Morris Sheppard, a Texas senator for 27 years, died of a stroke in his
sleep. Johnson knew that it was early for a Senate run. Like his
congressional campaign four years earlier, his name was virtually unknown outside of his district. He would be starting all
over again, and it would be a long, expensive campaign. But
Johnson had something that no other potential candidate in
Texas had. He had Brown & Root’s money.
Winning the open Senate seat was going to be expensive.
Johnson needed to plaster his name from county to county, buy
radio ads, newspaper ads, and hold public-speaking engagements all over the state. It was going to be one of the most costly
Senate campaigns to date. Yet, Brown & Root was undaunted.
In May 1941, less than a month after Sheppard had passed away,
Brown & Root called together dozens of their business partners
and subcontractors at a luncheon in Houston. These were
Texas-based companies who had been profiting from Brown & Root’s lucrative contracts for years. They were indebted to
Brown & Root, some of them even dependent on them. And the
orders they were given were clear: support the Johnson Senate
campaign with everything you can. “I did everything I could to
help get him elected,” said George Brown. “Went to rallies and
helped get people to speak for him. Organized everybody we
could to get a segment—all through the business segment, labor
segment, to be for him.”
The Browns began systematically contributing money to
the campaign, collecting more than $100,000 for Johnson in
less than one month. In theory, the contributions were illegal—according to the Federal Corrupt Practices Act—but
there were any number of ways around the law. At the time,
the limit on spending in a Senate campaign was $25,000,
none of which could come from a corporation. Of course,
Johnson was not the only candidate who brazenly disregarded this law, which was poorly enforced. Bags of cash, envelopes stuffed with $100 bills, accounting sleight-of-hand;
all conceivable techniques of hiding the destination of the
Browns’ money were employed. Where the Browns got sloppy,
or perhaps just greedy, was in looking for ways to mask the
corporate contributions as tax-deductible business expenses.
Legal fees, excessive bonuses (some as high as $40,000), and
“rental fees” were some of the ways that Herman Brown tried
to limit the expense of his political contributions. Herman
Brown knew that he had to continue supporting Johnson
with company money. He just didn’t want it to impact the bottom line quite so much.
In some cases, the money took roundabout routes in getting to Johnson, a sort of political money-laundering scheme.
Lawyers would take bonuses from the Browns, pay the money to someone else in their law firm, take it back in cash, and
give it away to the campaign. Some of the money was used to
pay campaign expenses directly, never having gone through
the campaign headquarters. Radio ads, transportation costs,
printing fees, all were routinely paid for by unknown Johnson supporters. And it was more than just money that Brown
& Root contributed. Johnson’s rallies were peopled with
enthusiastic Brown & Root employees, adding their vocal talents to the cause. At this time, Herman Brown’s influence
over other politicians and businessmen in Texas was growing
considerably. Brown had become the center of a growing
sphere of influence in the state, the Suite 8F crowd—a group
of business and political elites who met regularly in Herman
Brown’s suite in the Lamar Hotel in Houston. The group
began to recognize its collective power over Texas politics in
the early 1940s, and as such was often able to close ranks and
support united causes. Among the informally initiated were
Houston’s leaders in banking, insurance, law, oil, construction, and media. It was becoming a true force in Texas, and
Herman Brown was at the center of it. With his forceful temperament and growing fortunes, Brown was able to sway the
political beliefs of his wealthy colleagues, giving Johnson
wide support from the business community.
Brown kept the money flowing throughout the Senate campaign. When Johnson was showing weakness in the polls,
Brown again called on his subcontractors, some of whom were
reluctant to spend even more money on what was beginning to
look like a losing cause. But Brown put the screws to them.
“Now listen, we’ve made you a lot of money,” he would tell
them. As things grew increasingly desperate for the Johnson
campaign, the money spigot was opened yet wider. Votes were openly purchased in certain districts of the state—it is worth
mentioning that certain counties had always put their votes up
for sale, and Johnson was not the only Texas politician employing this technique. Time became a factor, and Herman Brown
lost patience with some of the covert methods he had used to
funnel money to Johnson. He gave $5,000 of his own money directly to Johnson, and began shuffling more through his subcontractors. Though it will never be known how much money
Brown & Root contributed to Lyndon Johnson’s 1941 Senate
campaign, the experts believe it was upwards of $200,000. Some
people believe that Johnson spent $500,000 on that campaign
after all was said and done.
Despite having an unlimited amount of Brown & Root’s
funds at his disposal, waging the most expensive campaign in
the history of Texas politics to date, and calling in favor after
favor from Herman Brown, Johnson lost the election to Pappy
O’Daniel. Johnson, the Browns, and half the business community in Texas were shocked and devastated by the loss. But losing the election would be nothing compared to what would
come after. The Wild West atmosphere and free-wheeling
spending of the election had raised a red flag in Washington.
The Internal Revenue Service was going to take a closer look.
•••
Ironically, if Lyndon Johnson had won the 1941 Senate seat in
Texas, life for Brown & Root would have continued much as it
had over the previous decade. Johnson likely would have alerted
the Browns of contracts coming from the federal government
and fought to squeeze every dollar he could out of each contract for his most trusted supporters. Instead, because Johnson
122
Our Man in Office
did not win, Brown & Root faced trouble from the federal
government. Because Johnson was not Brown & Root’s newly appointed senator from Texas, he would have a very hard time fixing the problem.
A full year had passed since the madness of the 1941 Senate
race, and Lyndon Johnson had settled, grudgingly, back into
his role as congressman. Though he still had strong connections in the White House, Johnson knew that he had missed
out on an opportunity to gain even more influence in Washington. That was leverage he would sorely miss when in July
1942, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) noticed some anomalies in Brown & Root’s books and began an investigation. It is
arguable whether the investigation would have been pursued
if Johnson had been senator, even with the serious suspicions
of the IRS and the enormous amounts of money involved. But
with Johnson emotionally struggling to recover from a devastating loss, the investigation steamed ahead.
The IRS was focusing on the large and ambiguous attorney’s fees and employee bonuses that Brown & Root had used
to disguise their campaign contributions, thereby enabling
them to write them off their taxes. It was essentially a tax evasion investigation and the IRS didn’t know the true destination of the money. The Brown brothers knew the destination
of the money, and so did Lyndon Johnson. If the IRS were to
continue digging, they would eventually find their way to the
Johnson Senate campaign, and Brown & Root would be facing
criminal charges for attempting to defraud the government.
Worse, Johnson’s political career would go down in flames. A
fine they could handle, but neither Johnson nor the Browns
could sustain a criminal conviction. The investigation had to
be stopped.
Brown & Root called on Alvin Wirtz to represent them, but
they knew that it was really Johnson who would make this go
away. Never before had the interests of both the Browns and
Johnson been so perfectly aligned. And never before had the
stakes been this high. Johnson crafted a plan to halt the investigation by enlisting the support of the president. Johnson and
Herman Brown had confidence in Roosevelt’s support given
the role both Brown & Root and Johnson had played in securing a Democratic House. And they hoped this confidence
was well placed because the president was probably the only
chance they had.
Johnson told the president that there was a politically motivated investigation into the Browns’ business in Texas, and
that it was intended to end Texas’ support of the New Deal.
Brown & Root had been great financial backers of New Deal
candidates in Texas and, without their financial backing, the
New Dealers would take a hit. The allegations of a political
witch-hunt weren’t true, but it didn’t matter. It was the kind of
argument that would strike the right chord with the president,
who as Johnson and Herman Brown anticipated, discussed the
matter with the folks at the IRS leaving Brown & Root confident that this was the last they would hear of the matter.
It wasn’t going to be that easy though. The IRS had seen
enough already to believe that this was indeed a very serious
issue. They were going to proceed with the investigation. Johnson, regrouping now, began going up the chain of command
at the IRS. He met with Commissioner Guy T. Helvering, but
Helvering had his hands tied. Helvering told Johnson that the
Secretary of the Treasury himself, Henry Morgenthau Jr., was
behind the investigation now, and he was not the kind of man
that would bend to political tail twisting.
Johnson called on James Rowe, who had been his liaison
to the White House during the 1941 Senate campaign, to get
Roosevelt to turn Morgenthau back. But nothing would work.
Rowe’s attempts at stalling the investigation were met with
Morgenthau smelling blood and turning up the heat. By winter in 1942, the case was starting to come together. IRS agents
were interviewing people throughout Texas, setting up shop in
Brown & Root’s accounting department, and subpoenaing
bank records and check stubs. Bonuses were found worth
more than $150,000 that they believed had in some way gotten
into the Johnson campaign coffers and had been written off as
tax deductions. Brown & Root subsidiaries, like the Victoria
Gravel Company, which was paying exorbitant attorney fees to
lawyers who in turn paid off Johnson’s campaign expenses,
were unearthed. Many of the bonuses began as checks, but by
the time the money arrived at campaign headquarters, it was
all cash. A typical scam was for an employee or subcontractor
to receive a $5,000 payment, cash it, stuff $100 bills into an envelope and mail it straight to the Johnson campaign.
Finally, the investigation reached the very top of the company. By the summer of 1943, IRS agents began interviewing
Brown & Root executives. Many were defiant, denying any allegations of impropriety. George Brown played innocent. “We
have certainly not directed anybody to give campaign funds.
We knew it was not legal to give any political funds, and if anybody working for Brown & Root gave any political funds, it was
without our knowledge. Certainly I don’t think it has been
charged to Brown & Root. If it has, it certainly shouldn’t have
been.” Herman Brown, as straightforward as ever, admitted he
had paid only the standard $5,000 personal contribution into
the campaign.
Meanwhile, Wirtz and Johnson continued to seek audience
with Roosevelt to plead their case for having the investigation
terminated. Every attempt to intervene, however, was met with
not only resistance, but a redoubling of the IRS’s efforts. By the
fall of 1943, panic was beginning to set in at the Brown & Root
camp. Morgenthau had opened the investigation up to outside
individuals, meaning Johnson officials and possibly even Johnson himself could become targets of interviews and further investigation. Agents began to close in on the Johnson camp,
identifying a campaign employee named Wilton Woods who
had taken a $7,500 payment from Brown & Root, and, they believed, handed it over to the Johnson campaign. Though Woods
originally gave testimony that fed the IRS agents’ suspicions,
upon arriving in Washington, DC, in January 1944, he and his
attorney—Everett Looney, part of the Suite 8F crowd—declined
to comment on all questions posed.
It was all getting too dangerous for Johnson, and he urgently
phoned the president to request a meeting after the Woods interview. The IRS had already determined that Brown & Root
owed over $1 million in back taxes, but they were growing increasingly convinced that the company also had partaken in
criminal wrongdoing. Finally, on January 13, Johnson was
given an audience with the president. Immediately following
that meeting, Roosevelt ordered a full report from the IRS on
the status of the investigation. The report gave clear evidence
of fraud and tax evasion, and even had admissions on the part
of some participants of their role.
The next day, a new agent was assigned to the Brown &
Root investigation, one who had not been involved in any way
up to that point. After three days of familiarizing himself
with the investigation, the new agent decided that there was
126
Our Man in Office
insufficient evidence to bring criminal charges against Brown
& Root, particularly in light of the role the company played during the war. He recommended a 50 percent penalty, amounting
to $549,972. The original team of agents, who had been working on the case for 18 months, were told to drop it when they
asked to continue the investigation. After all was said and done,
the fine was in fact lowered to $372,000, and that was the last
anyone heard of the Brown & Root IRS investigation.
That the case was dropped, in part, on the basis of Brown &
Root’s participation in the war was, of course, laughable. The
war business had come to Brown & Root through Johnson’s manipulation of the political system. And it had made Herman
and George Brown fantastically wealthy. In researching this
mess, I got the impression that had the Browns been making
ships that aided in the war effort, or just building roads or dams
at home, it wouldn’t have mattered to them, as long as they were
making ever-higher profits. The work that made them millionaires was the same reason the company was spared prosecution
on potentially illegal campaign contributions and defrauding
the government. The power of Brown & Root’s political investments had indeed come full circle.
•••
After what they had just been through, you would think that
the Brothers Brown would reconsider their political spending habits. Not only had their candidate lost after they had
broken every rule of campaign financing and spent hundreds
of thousands of their own money, but they had nearly been
found guilty of actual crimes, crimes that require jail time. It
appeared that the time had come to cool off the relationship a little bit, and that maybe Brown & Root should get back to the
business of competing on the basis of its actual merits rather
than relying too much on a single political figure. These
would have been logical things to conclude. But the truth
was that Brown & Root needed politicians to succeed. And Lyndon Johnson needed Brown & Root. The two were inextricably
linked, and backing out was no longer an option.
The IRS investigation of the 1941 Senate campaign had gone unnoticed by the media and the public, but the Texas political
scene was growing ever more familiar with Johnson’s coziness
with Brown & Root. In 1946, during a reelection campaign for
congress, Johnson’s opponent, Hardy Hollers, said what was on
many people’s minds. He called Johnson “an errand boy for
war-rich contractors.” It was the exact kind of tough political
talk that senators and congressmen are today employing in calling for a congressional investigation of Halliburton’s business
in Iraq. Hollers went on to say, “If the United States Attorney
was on the job, Lyndon Johnson would be in the federal penitentiary instead of in the Congress.” Though Hollers had no political experience, the words resonated with Texans, who had
grown weary of corrupt politicians, but knew little else. Johnson
was reelected, as almost all Texas congressmen were at that time
(until they died), but the race was closer than expected, proving that Hollers had struck a chord.
But what could Johnson and the Browns do about it? Severing ties was out of the question. There was only one direction
to move in, and that was forward, deepening the relationship
and furthering both of their aims. That opportunity was presented when Johnson chose to run for Senate again, this time
in 1948. The Browns promised to fund the campaign as richly
as the first, maybe more. Any money that Johnson needed, he was to have. Because this time, the Browns couldn’t lose. And
neither could Johnson.
Johnson had made it into the second primary. Upon reaching
the second primary against Coke Stevenson, the well-liked former governor of Texas, Johnson was way behind in the race, and
some in the Johnson camp felt he should concede the race to
Stevenson. But it was far too late for quitting. Brown & Root had
again funded the campaign up to that point beyond all reasonable limits, and along the way Johnson had waged a smear campaign against Stevenson that had backfired. The campaign was
so dirty—with Johnson once again linking his adversary, this
time Stevenson, to communist groups—that the Browns feared
retaliation from Stevenson if he were to be elected to the
Senate. They felt certain that an investigation into their funding of the Johnson campaign would be launched, and that
Stevenson would shut them out of Washington, DC, closing all
the doors that Johnson had previously opened. It was entirely
possible that if Johnson were to lose again, both Johnson and
Brown & Root would be finished. According to Ed Clark, Brown
& Root’s attorney, “They [Brown & Root] were regulated in a
thousand ways, and Stevenson would have run them out of
Washington. He would say, if anyone wanted to give them a contract, ‘They’re personally objectionable to me.’ The Browns
had to win this. They had to win this. Stevenson was a man of
vengeance, and he would have run them out of Washington.
Johnson—if he lost, he was going back to being nobody. They
were going back to being nobody.”
The future of Brown & Root was once again in doubt, and
once again it was all in the hands of the lanky politician from
the Texas Hill Country. Again money flowed, but this time in
absurd quantities. Desperation was driving the campaign, and according to Caro’s account, men carrying grocery bags
full of hundred dollar bills ($25,000, $40,000, even $50,000)
walked from business to business collecting cash donations for
Johnson. There were stories of Johnson’s men misplacing sacks
with $40,000 inside, or leaving money in a shirt pocket. One
thing that the Browns had learned from the last Senate race
was that questionable campaign donations were a cash-only
business.
Johnson was flown all over the state in Brown & Root’s
plane. The money paid for helicopters to get to smaller towns.
He bought media placements and radio spots. Brown & Root
called in their subcontractors again, as in the last election,
and began applying steady pressure. According to former U.S.
Senator Ralph Yarborough, “They were spending money like
mad. They were spending money like Texas had never seen.
And they did it not only so big but so openly . . . they were utterly brash. And they were brash about how they spent it, and
they were utterly ruthless. Brown & Root would do anything.”
And they did.
Historical documents have shown that much of the money
the Browns contributed was used to buy votes in South Texas.
Ed Clark flew on Brown & Root planes down to “Mexican
Country,” where votes could be bought, to do business with the
county judges. But even with that advantage, and with election
day fast approaching, Johnson still didn’t have enough votes.
After the election, on August 28, 1948, Johnson knew he didn’t
have enough to win, so he started working the phones, telling
people to “find” more votes as the returns continued to trickle
in. They did, and Johnson began to catch up, even as many as
six days after the polls had closed. Finally, it appeared that Johnson had won the primary by a total of 87 votes, earning
Johnson the nickname, “Landslide Lyndon.”
The drama was not over. Because so many votes had shown
up after the election, the Stevenson camp disputed the results
in court. The matter was referred to the Texas State Democratic Executive Committee, which would hold a vote at the State
Democratic Convention in Fort Worth on who had won the
election. Like the popular vote before it, the Executive Committee vote was going to be extremely close. Johnson called
Herman Brown.
Brown, ironically, hated politicians, but this was no time to
let his principles get in the way. Brown came to the convention
and worked the crowd for Johnson. He flew people in from
around the state to vote on Johnson’s behalf. “That night in
Fort Worth, Herman Brown called in all his chits,” says Caro.
“It was necessary that he call them in, he told the recipients of
his calls, because if Lyndon Johnson didn’t win in the Executive Committee tomorrow, there might not be any more contracts—or subcontracts. The full, immense, weight of the
economic power of Brown & Root was thrown behind Lyndon
Johnson that night.” It worked. Johnson won the Executive
Committee vote by one, 29 to 28. On January 3, 1949, Lyndon
Johnson became a U.S. senator for the state of Texas.
From his first congressional reelection campaign, through
his successful Senate campaign, Brown & Root had supplied
the money and the muscle behind Lyndon Johnson’s career.
Now that they had gotten him to his highest post yet, they were
expecting great things. And they would get them, though
George Brown would later play down the benefits of Johnson’s
Senate tenure. “In a material way there was no way for him to help us because we had to be low bidder on everything that we
got from the government. So the only thing he could do at all
would be to give us information that might become available
to him as to what appropriations they were thinking about.”
But Brown & Root’s relationship with Johnson had gotten
them more than just the lucrative contracts from government
agencies. It had earned them the respect and loyalty of the entire Houston business community. There was a rising force in
Houston politics, at the center of which was Herman Brown.
This force was known simply as Suite 8F.
•••
During the 1930s and 1940s, a rare and unique group of obscenely wealthy and successful men were in the process of
forming one of the most powerful informal special interest
groups in history. Though rich and influential businessmen
are common in any city, the cohesive group that jelled in
Houston in the middle of the twentieth century was exceptional by any measure. The Suite 8F crowd would collectively
control the development of Houston and have a far-reaching
impact on legislation throughout the state and the country.
Combining sheer wealth, a common will, and a broad range of
political influence, Suite 8F was nothing less than the reigning
governing body of Texas for the better part of three decades.
Herman Brown’s suite at the Lamar Hotel in downtown
Houston became the regular meeting place for a cast of characters that included, aside from both Brown brothers; Jesse H.
Jones, a legendary millionaire that came to be known as “Mr.
Houston,” who built his fortune on everything from lumber
trade to banking to newspaper ownership, and ultimately held several high-ranking posts in national politics including chairman of the Reconstruction Finance Corporation and Secretary of Commerce; Gus Wortham, the founder of the
American General Insurance Company and real estate magnate who would serve as the civic leader of the group; James A.
Elkins Sr., a judge and cofounder of the massive law firm Vinson and Elkins, who also founded Houston’s largest bank, First
City Bancorporation, and funded Wortham’s American General Insurance early on; and James Abercrombie, known simply as Mr. Jim, who founded Cameron Iron Works, one of the
top oil tools manufacturers in the world.
Though that core group served as the guiding force of Suite
8F, the group would have many peripheral members who came
and went depending on whether their power was waning or on
the rise. Alvin Wirtz, Ed Clark, and former long-time Texas
Governor William P. Hobby all spent considerable time with
the boys in Suite 8F. John Connally, another former Texas
governor, partner at Vinson and Elkins, and Secretary of the
Navy, also ran with the Suite 8F crowd. And of course, Lyndon
Johnson, the man whose hands held the Browns’ future, was a
regular guest at Suite 8F gatherings. Anyone who meant anything to Texas state politics put in their time at Suite 8F. It was
a rite of passage, and Herman Brown was the gatekeeper.
In the beginning, Suite 8F was simply a social gathering
place, where friends of the Browns could congregate to have a
drink, talk about business and politics, and unwind after long
days of work. Gradually, the room began to take on much more
importance, however, as deals that shaped the financial and political landscape of Texas were made. Houston historians Joseph
Pratt and Christopher Castaneda described the common goals
of the group as working toward a “healthy business climate, characterized by a minimum of government regulations, a weak
labor movement, a tax system favorable to business investment,
the use of government subsidies and supports where needed to
spur development, and a conservative approach to the expansion of government social services.”
The inherent irony in the purpose of the group was that they
at once tried to limit the impact of politics on their respective
businesses, while using those same politicians and legislation
to further their aims. Political candidates in Texas would literally interview at Suite 8F in order to secure the collective support of the group. If successful in gaining the backing of Suite
8F, elective success virtually always followed. Spurning 8F was
political suicide. Journalist Harry Hurt wrote that the group
met “to relax—drink and play poker—but also to talk politics,
exchange ideas, make business decisions, and choose the candidates they would support for public office . . . Their blessing
was the blessing of ‘The Establishment.’ Their rule was virtually unchallenged and—they would emphasize—very ‘civic minded’ gerontocracy.”
Former Mayor of Houston Roy Hofheinz learned the raw
power of this “civic-minded gerontocracy” when he was handpicked by the group to run for office. After supporting Oscar
Holcombe as mayor for 10 straight terms, Suite 8F grew tired of
Holcombe’s desire to step up social programs in the city. The
group abruptly switched camps, throwing their support behind
Hofheinz, who promised to be a more business-friendly leader.
In 1953, riding a wave of support from Suite 8F, Hofheinz unseated Holcombe.
During his second term, Hofheinz backed a drive to raise
property assessments in Houston, a move that angered the
members of the 8F elite. All of the Suite 8F crowd owned real estate in Houston, and the move by Hofheinz was seen as
ungrateful and in direct conflict with the group’s financial
interests. Immediately, Suite 8F, having already proven to Holcombe how crucial their support was by unseating him in
1953, asked Holcombe to come back as mayor and promised
their support. In response, Hofheinz told both Houston newspapers that in 1952 he had met with the Suite 8F crowd, in
anticipation of his 1953 run for mayor. He said that he was
told by Herman Brown that Suite 8F had decided to unseat
Holcombe. Hofheinz was assured that he would have the
group’s support “and all you have to do is call them down the
middle.” With this act, Hofheinz essentially hung himself politically. In 1955, Holcombe beat Hofheinz with 57 percent of
the vote, and Suite 8F demonstrated once again where the real
power base of Houston resided.
•••
The business interests of the Suite 8F crowd overlapped to an
absurd degree. They served on the boards of each others’
companies. They merged and acquired companies with each
other. In one instance, the Browns owned a controlling share
in Houston’s First National Bank. In the 1950s, they were looking for a merger partner, as their investment had fallen on
hard times. They started negotiations with Jesse H. Jones, also
known as “Uncle Jesse” and “Jesus H. Jones,” who owned the
National Bank of Commerce. Jesse lived upstairs from the
Suite 8F, in the penthouse suite at the Lamar Hotel. Jesse was
older, and even more powerful than the Browns, and he was a
tough sell on the bank. He dragged negotiations out, angling
for a better price. Finally, the two thought they had sealed a deal, but at the last minute, Jones wanted to renegotiate.
George Brown, who had been handling the negotiations, simply drove down the street to City National Bank, owned by
James Elkins, and cut a deal with him, creating the largest
bank in Houston.
Gus Wortham, who occupied Suite 7F in the Lamar Hotel,
funded his American General Insurance Company with money
from Judge Elkins and Jesse Jones. The company, in turn, supplied insurance for his friends’ businesses, including a supply
of workman’s insurance for the Mansfield Dam, which was
built by Brown & Root. He later led the Houston Chamber of
Commerce, the organization that would ultimately supplant
Suite 8F as the guiding hand of the Houston business community. Vinson and Elkins supplied Brown & Root with legal advice to supplement that of Ed Clark and Alvin Wirtz. Charles
Francis, the man that was so crucial in securing Brown &
Root’s interests in the Big Inch and Little Big Inch pipelines,
later became a partner in Vinson and Elkins. The incestuous
nature of the Suite 8F crowd was their strength, and made the
group a force that dominated Houston’s development throughout the 1940s and 1950s.
Though the impact of Suite 8F could be felt nationwide—it
was Suite 8F, anchored by Herman Brown, that was behind the
strident anti-union laws that were passed during the post
World War II era—the full weight of the group was felt in and
around Houston. In the late 1950s, the Suite 8F crowd decided
it was time that Houston get a new, state-of-the-art jet airport
to supplement the smaller Hobby Airport. The aim of the
group, as always, was to build Houston into a world-class city,
where big business could get done. A major new airport would
go a long way toward achieving that aim. Besides, all of the Suite 8F members were frequent travelers, and they had lost
patience with Hobby Airport, then called Houston Municipal,
and the fog delays that plagued air travel south of the city.
Acting more like the Texas Legislature than a group of self interested businessmen, the group commissioned studies of
potential sites for new airports, despite the fact that Hobby Airport had recently been renovated. They went ahead and quietly purchased land north of the city, and created the Jetero
Ranch Company as their corporate body. All of this was done
before there was any official proposal for a new airport in
Houston. So confident was the Suite 8F crowed that it could
make a new airport happen, they didn’t bother to alert anyone
else in Houston. They then met with Mayor Holcombe, whom
they had installed as mayor two years earlier. At the meeting,
the mayor was informed that Suite 8F—not formally, of course,
but the members of Suite 8F—had purchased the land with
borrowed money and would hold on to it until the city was
ready to build the airport. Holcombe, not surprisingly, supported the idea.
Holcombe arranged to have the city buy the land from
Jetero for $1.9 million, and fund the purchase and the subsequent airport construction through the issuance of bonds. But
Holcombe left office shortly after and his replacement, Louis
Cutrer, was skeptical of Suite 8F’s motives. “You’re not going
to tell me that that bunch of high rollers isn’t in this for the
money,” he said. “They’re looking for a profit on this.” Cutrer
tried to hold up the deal while the Browns tried to spin the airport deal to the public as a “civic service.” Public support for
the project waned, and Cutrer asked for an extension on the
purchase plan that Holcombe had arranged. Ultimately, it was
a futile resistance for Cutrer, and he was forced to make a humiliating public apology to the group for doubting their intentions. The airport purchase went forward as Suite 8F had
planned, and Houston Intercontinental Airport opened in
1969. Now Bush Intercontinental Airport, it remains the main
terminal serving the Houston area today.
•••
Recognizing the power of Suite 8F, senators, congressmen,
and businessmen from all over the country regularly visited
when in Houston. But the power of Suite 8F was not the actual
room in the Lamar Hotel, but the collection of men who occupied it. And the group moved together, in varying combinations of people, from place to place around the state and
country. Each year the group could be found, together, at the
Kentucky Derby (many of the members invested in race
horses). They joined the same social clubs. And they vacationed together, usually at the Palomas Ranch, close to Falfurrias, Texas. The Browns shared the 40,000 acre ranch there
with Abercrombie, where the men would retreat to hunt, play
cards, and drink.
The group also frequented the Browns’ ranch in Fort Clark,
Texas, a sprawling estate purchased from Army surplus land in
West Texas. The Browns would invite senators and congressmen to the ranch for the weekend, dispatching one of their
fleet of DC-3s to scoop them up from their respective districts
and deposit them on Herman Brown’s home turf. As one DC-3
pilot recalls, “If it wasn’t hunting season, why, it was always political season. That is to say we’d go by Austin and pick up a
group of congressmen or senators or something and go out
and spend the weekend at Fort Clark and they’d have their big political powwows.” In 1957, Lyndon Johnson wrote Herman
Brown in his typical over-the-top manner, to let him know, “I
want to go on record that last week at Fort Clark was one of the
most enjoyable weeks I have ever spent in my life.”
Fort Clark was a man’s world, where senators could get
falling-down drunk, men could play with guns, and no one
would fear the consequences of their actions. Even the journalists who were often invited to join in the festivities would
not dare write about their time at Fort Clark. After one visit to
Fort Clark, Herman Brown’s son-in-law, Ralph O’Connor, was
appalled by some of the behavior these stately men were exhibiting. Brown pulled him aside, and said, “It’s very easy for
people to, without knowing it, to say things, to say so-and-so
was drunk, sloppy drunk. That’s why these people come down
here. He’s a very important man. He’s got to let off steam. I
don’t want you to say anything.”
Closer to Washington, DC, the Browns also owned a ranch
in Middleburg, Virginia, where they could court senators and
congressmen without flying them all the way out to West
Texas. Known simply as “Huntland,” the 450-acre farm gained
brief notoriety when in 1955, Lyndon Johnson suffered a heart
attack there during a visit. Johnson went to great lengths to
conceal his trips to the Browns’ ranches, often telling his secretary not to contact him unless it was an emergency, and
never to let a caller know of his whereabouts.
As the Suite 8F crowd grew in national power through the
1950s, they became a very real force in Washington. Lyndon
Johnson was a senator. Alvin Wirtz, who died while attending
a University of Texas football game with Herman Brown in
1951, was Under Secretary of the Department of the Interior.
Jesse Jones held positions as federal loan administrator, chairman of the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, and
secretary of commerce. And George Brown himself served as a
member of several high-profile presidential commissions.
The Presidential Materials Policy Commission, which later
came to be known as the Paley Commission, was organized by
Harry Truman to study the issue of natural resources in America. The group consisted of five men, and the report they
produced in June 1952, entitled “Resources for Freedom,”
caused a stir. The report recommended, among other things,
government support of drilling and exploration. Brown &
Root had been doing considerable work in offshore drilling at
the time, and the Paley Commission findings not surprisingly
benefited that business.
George Brown, who evolved into the role of Brown & Root’s
liaison to the White House, went on to serve on several other
commissions. He was appointed by Eisenhower to advise the
Joint Congressional Committee on Atomic Energy. Eisenhower
again tapped Brown to join a commission to study conservation
of land and water in Texas. In 1959, Brown was appointed to the
Commerce Department’s Business Advisory Council. And then
in the 1960s, with his old friend Lyndon Johnson in the White
House, Brown was appointed to the Space Council that studied
issues regarding NASA. Brown was the only businessman on the
Space Council, and played a major role in convincing NASA to
build its Manned Spacecraft Center in Houston. Brown & Root
subsequently won the contract to build the Center.
The obvious and open manner in which Suite 8F in general,
and the Browns in particular, influenced politicians at every
level was appalling to many. But there was very little that anyone could do about it. As it has been for centuries, the nature
of this kind of political influence is very difficult to pin down. Friends like the Suite 8F crowd did business behind closed
doors, leaving no trail behind them. Alvin Wirtz, known for
burning his correspondences and instructing their recipients
to do the same, set the tone for this group. They must have
known what they were doing was wrong, which is why they went
to great lengths to conceal their motives. For the keen observer, however, the common will of these men and their intent was plain to see. The deals, the political manipulation,
the illegal campaign financing, it was all apparent to anyone
willing to admit it to themselves. But often, the truth is the
hardest thing to believe, and most citizens, given the choice,
preferred to believe that their democracy was intact and their
individual needs meant something to their elected representatives. The truth was far from it.
PART III
From Vietnam to Iraq
7
Vietnam and
Project Rathole
As striking as the similarities between modern-day Kellogg
Brown & Root (KBR) and the company’s distant past are,
there is no escaping the fact that history is indeed repeating itself when we look at the role the company played during the
Vietnam War and compare it to KBR’s work in Iraq today.
From the unpopularity of the wars themselves to the role that
powerful vice presidents played in securing massive construction contracts for the company, the parallels of the Vietnam
and Iraq Wars are stunning.
During World War II, self-interest actions by companies like
Brown & Root were excused by the media and the public because of the overwhelming need for American support of the
war. The words “war profiteering” were never used in those
days. Anything less than unmitigated support of America’s
troops and the companies that supplied them was deemed unpatriotic. Brown & Root emerged fat with profits—at the end
of the 1960s, the company was the largest engineering and construction firm in the country—and it had gained an unsavory
national reputation as an influence-peddling war profiteer.
The years of Vietnam would bring great change to Brown &
Root, just as they did for the rest of the country. As the political landscape shifted beneath their feet, the company would
endure the loss of their founder, Herman Brown; the heartbreaking sale of the company to Halliburton in 1962, a nasty
public battle over a major scientific project for the National
Science Foundation, and yet another politically charged bid
to win a massive contract to build NASA’s Manned Space Center in Houston. Although the monetary gains were great, the
company suffered its greatest loss: its independence and relative innocence. Though Brown & Root was far from without
sin leading up to the Vietnam era, they exited the turbulent
times publicly tainted by their relationship to then President
Lyndon Johnson. What had been a bunch of Texas good old
boys scratching each others’ backs became a national political grudge match between the Republicans and the Democrats as Johnson rose in power during the 1960s. Defending
their actions became a full-time job for the Brown brothers
from Belton. And the brashness of years past melted into a
more complex and sensitive understanding by Brown & Root
of the nation’s political zeitgeist.
• • •
During the 1950s, as Brown & Root was basking in the glow
of their new senator, Lyndon Johnson, Howco was undergoing a major expansion overseas. The company, by then well
146
Vietnam and Project Rathole
entrenched in the global oil well services business, began to acquire its way around the world. With its hydraulic fracturing division growing into one of the largest parts of its business, the
company leveraged its continuing success by moving into new
markets in Saudi Arabia, Peru, Columbia, Indonesia, Mexico,
Italy, Cuba, Libya, and Iran. From 1951 to 1957, the company’s
foreign revenues increased from $7 million to $32 million, and
its overall revenue grew from $94.5 million to $194.1 million.
The post-war boom was treating the folks at Howco very well as
the demand for oil exploded.
But the good times would not last. By the mid-1950s, demand for oil had begun to wane and recession set in. Oil consumption was dropping at a rate of about 7 percent a year, the
first such downward trend since the outbreak of World War II.
Erle Halliburton’s health was also in full retreat, and in 1957,
the man who as a pauper promised to make a million, died a
multimillionaire, leaving behind a company valued at $200
million with 10,000 employees.
In response to its declining revenue, Howco went on a spending spree in an attempt to diversify the company and safeguard
it against fluctuations in the global oil industry. It acquired
Welex Jet Services Inc., for just over 359,000 shares of stock
in the fall of 1957. In 1958, Howco picked up the Dallas-based
Otis Engineering Company, a maker of well-control equipment. Two years later, the company officially changed its name
to Halliburton Company, and began the process of courting
another Texas-based company that had grown up during the
Great Depression—Brown & Root. Though the purchase of
Brown & Root in 1962 would leave many financial analysts
scratching their heads given the disparate core competencies
of the two—and some are still scratching today—the purchase of the Brown brothers’ business carried Halliburton through
turbulent times.
•••
During the late 1950s, the Browns were experiencing growing pains of their own, though not of the financial kind. By
1957, at the height of Johnson’s power in Washington, Brown
& Root’s revenues were $262 million. They had profited from
military contracts, including two major contracts to build
air bases in France and Spain. The combined values for the
French and Spanish contracts, between 1953 and 1961, totaled $472 million. They also built a major naval air base in
Guam between 1946 and 1957 that brought in $81 million. All
of the faith that the Browns had put in Johnson and all the
money they had kicked into his campaigns, were paying off.
Johnson’s ambitions would take a toll on his personal relationship with Herman Brown and reveal both men’s true feelings about the other. By the late 1950s, Johnson, whose ultimate
goal had always been to become president, felt that he had
gained enough power and prominence to make a run at the
Democratic nomination. Herman Brown was perfectly comfortable with Johnson as Senate majority leader, and felt that Johnson’s plan to run for president was ill-advised, with a slim
chance for success. As he had done prior to all of his previous
campaigns, Johnson met with the Browns, this time flanked by
the powerful Suite 8F crowd, at the ranch at Falfurrias. Johnson
opened his presentation by saying, “I want to tell all of you fellows something. I’m thinking about running for president, and
if I do, it’s going to cost all of you a lot of money. So I want you
to think about it.” Herman Brown didn’t need to think about it, and blasted back at Johnson, calling his idea “the biggest mistake you’ve ever made.”
Johnson continued to plead his case to the men, going so far
as to count out the delegate votes he thought he could win. But
Brown wasn’t having any of it. He interrupted Johnson and told
the men it was time to go hunting. This was one political discussion Herman Brown didn’t want to have. Even after everything they had been through together, it seemed that Brown
still didn’t trust Johnson. In Herman Brown’s eyes, Johnson was
still just a politician, and as such, a means to an end. It became
clear to Johnson, just as it had 30 years prior when Brown
squeezed newly elected Congressman Johnson on the Marshall
Ford Dam, that Brown was using him. Brown feared that as a
presidential candidate, Johnson would have to bow to disparate
interest groups, and as a result, dilute his solid support of the
Browns. He was right. As Johnson campaigned, the distance
between him and front-runner John F. Kennedy increased. In
response, Johnson jettisoned his support of a national right-to work law, a broader version of the antilabor legislation that
Brown had rammed through the Texas Legislature years earlier
and staunchly supported on a national scale. It was the first
time that Johnson had let his political ambitions override his
need for Herman Brown’s support.
Despite the widening riff between Johnson and Herman
Brown, the presidential hopeful continued to lean on the
Browns financially and grew even closer to George Brown, who
had longed served as a buffer between his fiery, distrustful
brother and his good friend Johnson. When Johnson needed
$60,000 to pay for a televised debate against Kennedy, Brown
ponied up the cash. Though Herman Brown vehemently opposed Johnson’s presidential bid, the campaign financing from Brown & Root came through as it had in the past. After all, it was
too late for the Browns to withdraw their support now. As Senate
majority leader and presidential candidate, Johnson’s political
power had exceeded the Browns’ financial largesse. The tables
had finally turned for Johnson. And despite Herman’s objections, it was not lost on him that having a card-carrying member
of the Suite 8F crowd in the Oval Office would have to be good
for business.
But he didn’t win. Johnson fell hopelessly behind in the
polls, and essentially conceding defeat, agreed to become
Kennedy’s running mate. Herman Brown was incensed. In his
mind, the only thing the vice presidency could give Johnson
was a higher public profile and less power, two things that Herman Brown had no use for. George agreed. “I just thought it
was wasting his time as Vice President when he could be Senate
Majority Leader,” said George Brown. “I knew he’d be awfully
restless as Vice President.” Further enraging Brown was the
fact that Johnson had not consulted with him in advance of this
decision. August Belmont, who was in Suite 8F with Herman
Brown when the news came over the radio, recalled it this way:
“Herman Brown, who had sort of a face the color of those red
flowers anyway, he jumped up from his seat and said, ‘Who
told him he could do that?’ and ran out of the room.”
Houston historian and University of Houston professor,
Joseph Pratt told me that Johnson’s decision to accept the vice
presidency ended his relationship with Herman Brown. “Symbolically the break comes in 1960 when Johnson decides that
he can’t run for president and Herman Brown is pissed,” says
Pratt. “George Brown was deeply involved in the decision, but
Herman had an older, harder, tougher edge. Once Johnson
became vice president he moved out of the Browns sphere.” The move was a watershed moment for the politician where he
felt he no longer needed Herman Brown’s stamp of approval,
that he had essentially outgrown his main benefactor and had
catered to his needs for the last time. It was clear that the relationship between Johnson and Herman Brown could not survive mutually exclusive decisions. As long as their interests
were aligned, they were close friends, but the moment Johnson
spurned his patron, the friendship was revealed for what it
was: a business relationship.
•••
Herman Brown passed away five days after his 70th birthday,
the victim of a ruptured aneurysm, in November 1962. Lyndon Johnson eulogized Brown at the funeral and called him “a
builder of his community, his country, and his world.” In
preparation for Herman’s death—his health had been failing
for years—Herman and George had donated their stock to
the Brown Foundation, the charitable arm of the Brown empire that had overseen the brothers’ extensive philanthropy for
over a decade. Before the donation in 1962, the Brown brothers owned 95 percent of the stock in the still-private company,
all of which was turned over to the foundation.
In the months leading up to Herman’s death, the Brown
brothers had been involved in merger talks with Halliburton.
Though it seemed a strange fit, the Browns wanted to sell the
company, and they didn’t want to sell it to a competitor. Halliburton certainly seemed a likely candidate. For one thing,
Halliburton was an oil field services company and had no experience with the type of heavy construction in which Brown
& Root had become a world leader. Brown & Root had done some pipeline work, built some offshore drilling platforms,
and owned some petrochemical plants, but beyond that had no
experience in the nuts and bolts of the oil business.
Yet, there were some similarities between the two companies. Halliburton and Brown & Root were both built on the
backs of hard-nosed, gritty Texans who had come from nothing. They both were steadfastly open shops that loathed labor
unions. And since Halliburton had moved its headquarters
from Duncan, Oklahoma, to Dallas in the late 1950s, they were
relatively close in proximity. The major difference between
the companies was that Halliburton focused on research and
development, serving one market well with new technology.
Brown & Root was a far more political animal, content to win
the big contracts through insider maneuvering, then throw
men at it until it was done. Perhaps it was those wildly divergent styles that made them complimentary, but few in the
business press at the time saw the connection.
Neither, perhaps, did Herman Brown. Though it was the
Browns who initially approached Halliburton’s board with the
idea of a merger long before Herman Brown passed away,
the deal was later called off. It is thought that Herman Brown
was not comfortable with the acquisition. One month after Herman’s death, George Brown was president of Brown & Root and
the acquisition was back on. As the lead negotiator of
the transaction, George Brown shepherded the deal through
relatively quickly. Halliburton bought 95 percent of the stock in
Brown & Root from the Brown Foundation for a price
of $36,750,000. Halliburton used an $18 million loan and
$15,295,000 of its own cash, plus 70,000 shares of its own stock
to fund the deal. The final terms of the deal were announced on
Christmas Eve 1962. As part of the negotiation, Halliburton also acquired several other Brown properties, including Highlands Insurance Company, Southwestern Pipe, and Joe D.
Hughes trucking company. George Brown was named to the
board of Halliburton.
It is hard to imagine a deal of this nature being consummated while both Erle Halliburton and Herman Brown were
alive. Erle Halliburton detested the politics that the Browns had
so thoroughly embraced and Herman Brown had great trouble
turning over the reins of his beloved Brown & Root. But with
both men out of the picture, the deal took place in mere weeks.
George Brown no doubt took comfort in the fact that Halliburton had a history of granting autonomy and independence to
its acquisitions. Indeed Brown & Root maintained this attitude
until the late 1990s, when then-CEO Dick Cheney sought to
consolidate Halliburton into a more cohesive and streamlined
company. But for the 30 years after the merger, business at
Brown & Root went on as if Halliburton had never acquired the
company, and Herman Brown had never died.
•••
Prior to Herman Brown’s death, Brown & Root had begun
negotiations for a bizarre new contract being let by the National Science Foundation. This negotiation brought with it
the stark realization that with Johnson as the vice president,
and later president, Brown & Root was no longer able to fly
under the radar.
The idea, borne out of the 10-year-old National Science
Foundation, a government agency that was supposed to be
protected from the normal bureaucratic politics of the day,
was to drill an impossibly deep hole through the core of the earth and pierce the mantle that lay six miles below the surface. Even as the United States was gearing up for sending a
man into outer space, the race was on to delve further into
inner space. The Russians were planning a similar experiment, lending a certain competitive urgency to the U.S. project. Scientists believed that by sampling the various layers of
earth en route to the mantle, including the mantle itself, they
could learn the mysteries of how the earth was formed. A Yugoslavian professor named Andrija Mohorovicic had discovered a transitional layer of earth between the outer crust and
the mantle, which came to be known as the “Moho.” It was
thought that this layer held valuable data that justified the expenditure of the project, dubbed Project Mohole. In 1961, the
four-year project that was expected to cost $15 million began
testing off the coast of California.
The plan was fantastically ambitious. Offshore oil rigs had
proven that they could drill in ocean waters hundreds of feet
deep to find oil that lay just under the surface. But the areas
where the earth’s crust is thinnest, thus making the long drill
possible, lay under miles of ocean water; and the distance to
be drilled once terra firma had been reached, was beyond anything the oil industry could imagine. Nothing of the sort had
ever been attempted, and that interested Brown & Root—the
company that repeatedly gravitated toward massive projects in
which they had no experience.
After the testing phase of Project Mohole was completed in
1961, the National Science Foundation recommended that one
primary contractor be selected to complete Phase II of the
project: the design and building of a rig that could complete
the mission. There was no single company that had the capabilities the drilling would demand. Oil companies had some of the expertise and a great deal of self-interest, both of which would
be needed to achieve the goals of Mohole. Though the National
Science Foundation was wary of oil interests clouding the
scientific motives of the job, they had to admit that oil companies seemed like a logical choice for the job. In July 1961, the
National Science Foundation invited the business community
to submit proposals, stating that preference would be given to
those contractors submitting bids with no fees attached. They
received 10 responses, four from oil companies; some with detailed information on how the job would be done. Socony
Mobil, allied with General Motors, Texas Instruments, and Standard Oil of California, spent $150,000 researching and developing their bid.
Brown & Root’s proposal was not among the original bids.
The company had missed the initial briefing session in July for
those interested in bidding, and they had failed to communicate with the National Science Foundation at any stage prior to
the bidding deadline. But when the National Science Foundation officials opened the bids in September 1961, there was the
Brown & Root proposal, a last-minute surprise submission that
shocked the staff. Brown & Root had no scientific work on its
resume, only one PhD on staff, no partners in their proposal,
and a handful of shallow-water drilling operations to its credit.
Its proposal was full of general marketing materials and short
on details directly pertaining to Mohole. And it asked for a fee.
When the National Science Foundation rated the proposals,
Brown & Root’s ranked fifth, far behind that of Socony Mobil,
which the National Science Foundation panel called “in a class
by itself; outstanding as to every important aspect.”
The groups with the top five submissions were asked to revisit their bids and strengthen them in any way they saw fit for the final competition. In the meantime, the National Science
Foundation was busy getting its ballooning budget approved
by the House Appropriations Subcommittee. The chair of the
committee was none other than Texas Congressman Albert
Thomas, a member of the Suite 8F crowd and long-time beneficiary of Brown & Roots’ political largesse. Thomas was the
man who played a key role in securing the Corpus Christi contract for Brown & Root prior to World War II. He was also the
man who had proven to be the largest obstacle to National Science Foundation funding in the past. As the director of the
National Science Foundation, Dr. Alan T. Waterman, was delivering his budget justification speech to the committee, he
mentioned, casually, that Brown & Root was one of the finalists for Project Mohole. That was all Thomas needed to hear.
He called the budget “a work of art.”
With Thomas’ stamp of approval, Brown & Root won the
contract over its higher-ranking competitors, and despite asking for a $1.8 million fee. Originally, competitors were told
that submissions that did not include a fee would be given priority. The National Science Foundation wanted a contractor
who was interested in the scientific aims of the project and
would do the job at cost. But when Dr. Waterman was asked by
the press why he chose Brown & Root and their $1.8 million
fee, he gave this baffling explanation: “Perhaps we were
wrong, but we felt that it was more businesslike to pay a fee.” It
was a total reversal from the National Science Foundation’s
earlier stance, and it left the other competitors completely
dumbfounded.
The other justification that the National Science Foundation gave for granting the contract to Brown & Root was their
expertise in project management, which to that point was unassailable. Brown & Root had garnered a reputation for
being able to get a job done, no matter what it was, on time. It
is true that many Brown & Root projects saw their budgets soar
to unforeseen heights. But the job got done, and for many of
Brown & Root’s customers, particularly the military, that was
more important than controlling costs. The National Science
Foundation, however, was not that kind of customer.
Even before submitting an overall plan for the project to the
National Science Foundation, Brown & Root began ratcheting
up the costs. Project Mohole was originally expected to cost
$15 million, but by the first year of Brown & Root’s involvement, the budget had bloated to $47 million, then $68 million
the following year. As the company’s budget increases met
with resistance from the National Science Foundation, the priority status that the Mohole had been promised began to fall.
The manager Brown & Root had assigned to the job was
abruptly removed and reassigned to lead the NASA Manned
Spacecraft Center project. In its first year with the contract,
Brown & Root assigned four different lead managers to Project Mohole, and the pace of work was far slower than expected.
Then the technical difficulties began. Brown & Root planned
to build the drilling platform on top of two 500-foot submarines that would support its weight. The scientists from
American Miscellaneous Society (AMSOC), an affiliate of the
National Science Foundation that had been advising Brown &
Root during the planning phase, strongly opposed the idea and
rejected it as being too difficult and too costly. They espoused a
plan that used two surface ships to support the platform. The
two groups bickered incessantly and publicly, and ultimately,
Brown & Root took the unprecedented step of discharging the
AMSOC advisors in May 1963.
To top off the growing mess, congressmen began questioning
the origins of the contract, alleging that political favoritism
had played a role. As the budget ballooned and discord between Brown & Root and National Science Foundation reached
a fever pitch, lawmakers questioned whether it was prudent to
spend $125 million (the ultimate budget for Project Mohole) to
basically drill a hole in the ground. But every criticism was met
with a stern defense from Albert Thomas, who managed to protect and save the program for years while the technical glitches
were supposedly getting worked out. After Thomas’ death in
February 1966, there was no one left to defend Brown & Root’s
project, and the congressmen attacked what they were now calling “Project Rathole.”
One of the most vehement opponents of Project Mohole was
a young Illinois congressman by the name of Donald Rumsfeld,
who alleged that political contributions had played a role in
the Mohole contract. Rumsfeld, debating in the House the
summer of 1966, after five years of delays and added costs on
Mohole, pointed out that the House had rejected further funding of the proposal once already, but its efforts to stop Project
Mohole were rebuffed when President Johnson, in 1965, asked
the Senate to restore the project. It was obvious, said Rumsfeld,
that between Lyndon Johnson and Albert Thomas, Project
Mohole was being kept alive through artificial means in an effort to benefit big Democratic backers like the Browns. He
pointed out that the Browns had donated $25,000 to the Presidents Club, a major fund-raising arm of the Democratic Party,
and alleged that the donations and the still-lingering contract
had everything to do with one another. “Perhaps this is all another preposterous coincidence,” he said, but there were “too
many preposterous coincidences.” I doubt that Rumsfeld even knew at the time how far back the mutual back-scratching between the Browns and Johnson went.
The Browns and Johnson were not surprisingly, if disingenuously, indignant. “You can expect to have periodic charges of
this kind until November,” said Johnson of Rumsfeld’s comments, referring to upcoming elections. “They usually come
from the party that has been rather strongly rejected by the
people,” Johnson said, reminding the public of the previous
elections in 1964, when he beat Republican candidate Barry
Goldwater in a landslide victory. Contributions, he concluded,
“do not influence the awards.” It was too late, however. Rumsfeld’s accusations had hit their mark, and the Senate voted
down the continued funding of Project Mohole.
The irony is that Donald Rumsfeld as Secretary of Defense
in 2004 finds himself on the other side of the debate, as a
member of an administration that has had to repeatedly defend its choice of Kellogg Brown & Root as its primary contractor in Iraq. Today, the role that Donald Rumsfeld played
during the Mohole debacle is being reprised by Henry Waxman, a Democratic Representative from California. In the
current flap over Kellogg Brown & Root’s contracts in Iraq,
Waxman has sought to uncover more about the nature of
Halliburton’s work in Iraq, it’s ongoing relationship to Dick
Cheney, and the possibility of political favoritism. And he
has been asking many of those questions to the current Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. Like an unshakeable case
of déjà vu, Brown & Root has been kicked around like a political football for decades, first by the Republicans in the 1960s
and 1970s, then by Democrats in the 2000s. You would have
thought the two parties could have seen eye-to-eye at some
point in between and put a stop to the company’s relentless politicking. But there was too much money to be made and
too many campaigns to fund. Halliburton always had friends
in Washington.
•••
Part of the reason that Brown & Root failed to come through
on Project Mohole was that the company was distracted.
What had been seen as a patriotic mission to help America
beat the Russians in the race to inner space was supplanted by
the even more patriotic mission of helping America beat Russia to the moon. There were no concerns, just as there never
had been, that the company was biting off more than it could
chew. Frankly, there was no reason for the company to hold
back during the early 1960s. With Johnson in the White
House, Albert Thomas holding the purse strings for government agencies (as the chair of the House Appropriations Committee), and George Brown acting on several business advisory
councils and presidential commissions, the iron was hot. An
article in Life magazine captured the growing national awareness of Johnson’s relationship with Brown & Root when it lampooned a conversation between John F. Kennedy and Lyndon
Baines Johnson. Kennedy says to Lyndon after the 1960 election, “Now, Lyndon, I guess we can dig that tunnel to the Vatican,” to which Johnson replies, “Okay, so long as Brown &
Root get the contract.”
After 40 years of setting up a favorable political environment
both locally and nationally, the Browns put their varied talents
and strengths on display when it went after the high-profile contract for NASA’s Manned Spacecraft Center. Brown & Root’s
dream team for securing the NASA contract started with, as usual, Lyndon Johnson, the vice president of the United States
in 1961 and the chairman of the National Aeronautics and
Space Council, advising the president on space-race issues.
Johnson also had been the chairman of the Senate’s Space
Committee in the 1950s, while he was Senate Majority Leader.
In the spring of 1961, Johnson had appointed George Brown to
be the only civilian member of the Space Council, a committee
that advised the administration of NASA-related decisions.
Albert Thomas was already the chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, which held considerable influence
over NASA’s budget. And finally, James Webb, the director of
NASA beginning in February 1961, was a very close friend of
Lyndon Johnson. In some ways, Brown & Root had won the contract for the Manned Spacecraft Center before the center was
even conceived. “Albert and Lyndon worked as a team,” said
George Brown.
The first order of business was to convince NASA to locate
its center in Houston. Competition had been keen among several different states, including President Kennedy’s home
state of Massachusetts. But Brown & Root’s influence was even
greater than that of the president in this case. NASA knew that
if Houston was passed up again as it had been in 1958 for the
Goddard Space Flight Center (Maryland), Albert Thomas
would wield his power over NASA’s budget. That alone would
have been enough for NASA to choose Houston as the site.
Meanwhile, George Brown was convincing the Space Council
of Houston’s viability as a site. He arranged for his friend
Morgan Davis, the chairman of oil giant Humble Oil & Refining, to donate a thousand acres to Rice University, Albert
Thomas’ alma mater (and George Brown’s as well). Rice would
then offer the land up to NASA and work closely with the organization in cultivating a space program that would attract
the necessary scientific talent to the Houston area. Brown was
the chairman of the Rice board and as such enlisted the Rice
faculty’s support for the plan.
Between Johnson, Thomas, and Brown, NASA Director
James Webb didn’t stand a chance. He selected Houston as the
site for the center in September 1961, months before would-be
competitors could even submit a bid. It was a full-court press
from day one, and Webb, not even a year on the job (a job he
owed to Johnson to begin with) made the only politically viable choice he could.
Now that the Manned Spacecraft Center was to be based in
Houston, the next order of business for Brown & Root was to
win the building contract. The Army Corps of Engineers
quickly whittled a list of 175 architectural and engineering
firms down to one it felt was the most suitable. The winner?
Brown & Root, a contractor without strengths in either architecture or engineering. There were the requisite outcries of political favoritism from the spurned competitors, but since none
of the competitors really believed that anybody but Brown &
Root was going to build the Manned Spacecraft Center, the
contract award hardly came as a surprise. Brown & Root
picked up $2.3 million on the architecture contract, but tacked
on dozens of millions more over the years as its joint venture
work with Northrop Corporation continued to service the center, later named the Johnson Manned Spacecraft Center.
The Johnson Center is one of the last monuments to Brown
& Root’s dominance in the United States—it is the symbol of
the Browns’ ability to manipulate the political system to their
benefit. There were many symbols dotting the domestic landscape: the Mansfield Dam; Corpus Christi Air Base; and the Inch pipe lines to name a few. But as Vietnam clouded the political environment, Brown & Root would get pulled overseas
and into a new line of work that would forever change the nature of the company.
•••
The contracts for both Project Mohole and the Johnson
Manned Spacecraft Center would be dwarfed by what was to
come in Vietnam. In a stunning parallel, both Johnson and
George W. Bush would escalate the wars that defined their
presidencies based on questionable evidence. And both escalations would result in a bonanza of contracts for Brown & Root.
While George W. Bush struggles with the political fallout of
the war on terrorism and claims that Iraq was prepared to use
weapons of mass destruction, he might do well to learn from a
fellow Texan’s presidency 40 years earlier, when Lyndon B.
Johnson escalated the Vietnam War by blowing the Gulf of
Tonkin incident out of proportion, or from his own father’s
memoir, A World Transformed where the former president explained his reticence to invade Iraq during the Persian Gulf
War, writing: “. . . we had been self-consciously trying to set a
pattern for handling aggression in the post–Cold War world.
Going in and occupying Iraq, thus unilaterally exceeding the
United Nations’ mandate, would have destroyed the precedent
of international response to aggression that we hoped to establish. Had we gone the invasion route, the United States could
conceivably still be an occupying power in a bitterly hostile
land. It would have been a dramatically different—and perhaps barren—outcome.” Johnson, who became president in
1963 after Kennedy’s assassination and who was elected with broad support in 1964, used the Gulf of Tonkin incident, a
minor fracas in retrospect, to justify the sending of ground
troops into Vietnam. The result of that move was the need for
billions of dollars worth of bases, airstrips, ports, and bridges.
Enter Brown & Root.
In 1965, a year after Johnson stepped up America’s participation in Vietnam, Brown & Root joined three other construction
and project management behemoths, Raymond International,
Morris-Knudsen, and J.A. Jones to form one of the largest
civilian-based military construction conglomerates in history.
The group, which came to be known collectively as RMK-BRJ,
went on to do more than $2 billion worth of work in Vietnam,
of which Brown & Root took a 20 percent cut. The contract
was cost plus 1.7 percent, meaning that the consortium would
be reimbursed all costs, plus an additional 1.7 percent profit,
a method of contracting that encourages the contractor to
markedly increase costs, thereby increasing their profit. The
world would be reintroduced to this concept nearly 40 years
later when Kellogg Brown & Root won the same type of contract in Iraq.
RMK-BRJ literally changed the face of Vietnam, clearing
out wide swaths of jungle for airplane landing strips, dredging channels for ships, and building American bases from
Da Nang to Saigon. As part of the single most lucrative contract the company had ever entered into, Brown & Root was in
Vietnam from 1965 to 1972 pulling down $380 million in revenue in the process. But the gains had a cost.
The Vietnam contract had Brown & Root written all over it.
Similar to the priorities in Iraq in 2003, the emphasis was on
speed, not cost. RMK-BRJ was building everything from roads
to entire cities for the American military. Because of the rapid buildup of troops in Vietnam—up to 165,000 in 1966 from
just a few dozen thousand prior to Johnson’s escalation—the
army found it impossible to move men and supplies around
the country. Ports were backed up for weeks and in some cases
roads didn’t even exist. RMK-BRJ built two 10,000-foot jet runways and two deep-water piers in Da Nang; a permanent jet
runway in Chulai; two jet runways in Phanrang; ammunition
and fuel storage facilities; barracks; helicopter landing pads;
pipelines; hospitals; communications facilities; and warehouses. In short, the construction conglomerate built everything the American military needed in Vietnam. They did 97
percent of the construction work in the country during the
seven years they operated there. The remaining 3 percent went
to local Vietnamese contractors.
They were moving enough dirt to dig the Suez Canal and
paving enough roads to surface the Jersey Turnpike every 30
days. They had a small army of their own in the country, 51,000
at the height of operations in 1967, the largest employer in Vietnam. Twenty-three employees died and more than a hundred
were wounded. But their efforts were not in vain. The supply
problems dissipated. The ports opened up. Vietnam became a
modern country practically overnight. Then it got ugly.
Even as early as 1966, reports started reaching back to the
homeland that the United States was pouring money into a
sieve called Vietnam. One study by the New York Times found
that nearly 40 percent of the billions being spend in Vietnam
was being stolen, used in bribes, or outright wasted at the rate
of half a million dollars a day. RMK-BRJ came under fire for
not kiting costs and wasting upward of $5 million in its first
year in the country. Its workers were manipulating currency
and selling goods on the black market. Dozens of employees were sent home as punishment. By 1968, when most of the
country had grown weary of the war, Senator Abraham A. Ribicoff, Democrat from Connecticut, filed a report with the Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations alleging
kickbacks in the construction consortiums in Vietnam claiming that millions were being “squandered because of inefficiency, dishonesty, corruption, and foolishness.” He ordered
an immediate General Accounting Office investigation into
RMK-BRJ.
The GAO investigation, completed in 1967, charged RMK-BRJ with losing $120 million during its first five years in Vietnam. It said that “normal management controls were virtually
abandoned,” and that millions were lost due to lax security.
After decades of receiving accolades from government agencies and the military, Brown & Root was coming under fire for
wastefulness and inefficiency. The Pentagon actually acknowledged some of the blame in 1966, admitting that it had misled
the contractor, low-balling the estimated costs of the construction. By 1968, Johnson’s last year as president, RMK-BRJ was
significantly scaling back its operation to about 15,000 employees. The public impression was that Brown & Root was
part of a war-profiteering machine that monopolized work in
Vietnam, mistreated workers, and wasted millions of taxpayers’ dollars. But it would get even worse.
Brown & Root became the symbol of war-profiteering to
opponents of the war. And as the antiwar protests ramped up
throughout the 1960s, George Brown became the face of the
war profiteer. In 1971, the protests reached a fever pitch, and
Brown found himself the target of a particularly hateful outburst. He was to be honored by the University of Texas as a distinguished alumnus, despite having only attended the school temporarily. Students rallied and protested his appearance.
During the ceremony, students rushed on stage and handed
Brown a “special award,” a picture of the infamous tiger cages,
horribly inhumane prison cells built by the French government
75 years earlier to hold prisoners. RMK-BRJ was hired by the
military to build new, more humane prison cells to replace the
tiger cages. Forty years later, Kellogg Brown & Root would
again be called to build prisons for another unpopular war
when the army contracted the company to build the terrorist
prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, after the September 11,
2001, attacks, a place where detainees have been held for more
than two years. Brown’s association with the tiger cages was unfair, given that his company was merely hired to replace them.
But subtle distinction was not a luxury that protestors of the day
indulged in.
What was truly unfair was categorizing George Brown as a
war profiteer since he had repeatedly advised Johnson against
the escalation in Vietnam, believing that the war would destroy Brown and Johnson both. But Johnson didn’t listen and
the war raged on into the 1970s. Brown was dogged by protestors everywhere he went, despite the fact that he was removed
from Brown & Root’s day-to-day activities. Even Brown’s alma
mater, Rice University, could not stem the tide of protestors
when Brown visited the campus. It was a stark contrast to the
repeated applause Brown received for his company’s work during World War II.
The controversy and criticism was a small price to pay, however, for a company that had vaulted suddenly to the top of its
industry. Mohole, NASA, and Vietnam had done for Brown &
Root (which was part of Halliburton, but still operated independently) what the Mansfield Dam and World War II couldn’t: It made them the largest construction company in the United
States. In 1947, Brown & Root was the forty-seventh largest construction company in the country. By 1965, they were number
two, and by 1969, number one, with sales of $1.6 billion. Most of
the momentum took place while Johnson was president, a coincidence that was not lost on the competition. The rapid rise
brought on a fit of jealousy from Brown & Root’s biggest rival,
Bechtel of San Francisco. “Brown & Root . . . had gotten most
of the choice projects during LBJ’s administration, from constructing the Space Center in Houston to building the infrastructure for the Vietnam War. Bechtel, by contrast, had come
away with only comparative crumbs.” Bechtel found itself in a
position to protest Kellogg Brown & Root’s ties to the government again in 2003 when the Iraq contracts were awarded.
Bechtel pulled out of the running for certain contracts because
the company felt the structure of the bidding favored Kellogg
Brown & Root.
The 1960s and 1970s saw the end of the Brown brothers’ involvement in their beloved company’s affairs. It also saw an
unrelenting tide of political controversy beset the company
and hound it right into the 1980s. Amazingly, throughout it
all, the company achieved stunning financial success. As the
events of the Iraq War will attest, controversy and bad publicity do not necessarily mean sagging profits. In fact, it has
been quite the opposite for Brown & Root. The more controversy, the more profit. The Bush administration has been able
to deflect these controversies repeatedly with a well-timed
statue-toppling or dramatic landing on an aircraft carrier. In
the meantime, Halliburton and Kellogg Brown & Root are
keeping the meter running in Iraq, with the value of their
contract now reaching $2 billion and counting.
next
Empty Pockets
No comments:
Post a Comment