Who Is Greta Thunberg?
By Sven Svenson
First published September 27, 2019
Scrolling through the news headlines last week, I noticed this unusual one from NBC News: “Teen climate activist Greta Thunberg delivers scathing speech at U.N.” Most headlines don’t
bait me anymore, but this one did. It was simply too absurd a premise to resist. Greta Thunberg
is a Swedish 16-year-old who is passionate about climate change and was invited to speak at the
U.N. Climate Action Summit, where she roundly denounced the audience of elite stuffed shirts
for their “lies” and “betrayal”. She is now being hailed as the new face of climate activism. She
has also spoken at the Extinction Rebellion demonstration in London, the COP24 Summit in
Poland, Davos in Switzerland, the European Economic and Social Committee conference in
Brussels, the Austrian World Summit R20, the Prix Liberté Normandy ceremony (she received
the 2019 Freedom Prize), and a meeting of the US Congress Select Committee on the Climate
Crisis.
So far I’ve only relayed the mainstream facts, and I already feel like I’ve sufficiently outed her as
an actress, since no teenager rises to such meteoric fame without beaucoups of connections. But I
will go the extra mile, just for fun. For starters:
How can she manage to stay in school with all of that traveling? In the past year alone
she has been to at least seven countries and two continents over the course of a dozen
trips. It reminds me of David Hogg and the other “survivors” of the Marjorie Stoneman Douglas shooting hoax, , who suddenly became full-time gun-control activists, traveling
around the country, lobbying politicians, and soaking up the limelight while somehow,
we presume, also finishing high school. Thunberg has also orchestrated “Fridays for
Future” protests, where she and students around the world skip school on Fridays to
protest for climate action. Really? In what world do schools let their students play hooky
on a weekly basis without any repercussions? What parent lets their kid do this? They
could just as easily protest on Saturdays, or after school, and not risk certain discipline or
even expulsion. But of course Thunberg and her band of paid actors won’t have such
repercussions, because their protesting has all been arranged by their directors well in
advance.
Speaking of David Hogg, Greta says she was first inspired to become a climate activist
after watching him and his fellow students. Being inspired by Hogg is like being inspired
by Matthew McConaughey playing an activist in a movie about saving polar bears. No
one gets inspired by actors, because you intuitively know not to take it seriously. And
since we’ve already outed Hogg, any avowal of him is a massive red flag.
We’re told by the major media outlets that her U.N. speech was “tear-filled”. Go watch
the speech, I beg you. There are no tears. There is, however, the sound of a voice
modulating itself to sound distraught. You’ve heard that same artificial strain if you’ve
ever seen a school shooting “survivor” being interviewed right after the event. When
you’re truly distraught, your voice has a very distinct and unforced waver to it. Greta’s
voice is that of a stage actress simulating an emotional state on cue. And anyhow, no 16-
year-old girl is that passionate about climate change. Think back to when you were 16
and try to imagine getting revved up about anything like carbon emissions statistics,
much less wanting to put your social life on hold so you can go around talking to a bunch
of fat old bigwigs about it.
Thunberg has her own IMDB profile. You will tell me it’s because she has appeared as
herself in several documentaries on climate change. That’s not entirely true. She also has
a voice-acting credit in a short Spanish drama called Ave Paraíso. And the word
“Actress” appears below her name on IMDB. As it turns out, Snopes has “debunked” a
growing conspiracy theory that Thunberg is a paid crisis actress, and it specifically
addresses the fact that IMDB lists Thunberg as an actress. But we know Snopes is
controlled opposition. It is managed by Intelligence to frame conspiracy theories a certain
way so that they can be debunked a certain way. It controls the narratives on both sides to
keep you away from the truth. See how it does this with Thunberg, attacking a very
absurd theory that she is really an aspiring Australian actress named Estella Renee (real
name Estella Brasier*). This has no legs because they look and sound nothing alike. But
the beauty of the paid shills over at Snopes is that they often reveal more than they
conceal. They happen to show a video of Estella Renee speaking passionately about
climate change at a demonstration. Since they admit Renee is an aspiring actress who just
happened to get on camera advocating for climate action, it suggests an obvious
inference, doesn’t it? And Snopes does nothing to dissuade us of that inference. They just
quote this actress’s father: “It is possible to be both worried about climate-change and a
child actress at the same time.” As if that is proof enough. Strangely, her starnow.com page to which the Snopes article links has since removed Renee’s picture and her name.
Curious, no? And you have to laugh at how Snopes tries to deflect on Thunberg having
an IMDB page: “Even U.S. President Donald Trump is listed as an ‘actor’ on his IMDB
page.” Oh, really? Maybe that’s because Trump is an actor.
Greta’s family has been in the entertainment industry for multiple generations. That’s
something Snopes conveniently fails to mention. Her father Svante Thunberg is an actor
and producer, and her mother Malena Ernman is an opera singer and also an actress. Her
grandparents Olof Thunberg and Mona Andersson were both actors, as well. Olof is
famous enough to have his own Wikipedia page, where we learn that he “formed a
theatre club…that also included Lars Ekborg and the poet Bo Setterlind.” How did he
make these connections? It doesn’t say. He went on to do voice work on the radio
program Mannen i svart (“The Man in Black”) where he presented stories of “horror and
the supernatural in his deep voice”. In other words, mongering fear and chaos. Sound
familiar? He has done prominent voice acting for Swedish versions of classic animated
films such as Lady and the Tramp, The Jungle Book, Snow White, The Land Before Time,
and Monsters, Inc. As usual, Greta doesn’t come from obscurity, but from a prominent
family of actors. If Greta gave you hopes that your precocious daughter might one day be
invited to speak at the U.N., I’m here to dash those hopes. Only the children of the elite
get afforded such national attention.
All the above should be enough to close the case on Greta, and I still haven’t even touched on the
biggest jaw-dropper about her. She is related to the Nobel Prize-winning scientist Svante
Arrhenius. Never heard of him? Don’t worry, Wikipedia will clue you in:
Arrhenius, in 1896, was the first to use basic principles of physical chemistry to calculate
estimates of the extent to which increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) will
increase Earth's surface temperature through the greenhouse effect. These calculations
led him to conclude that human-caused CO2 emissions, from fossil-fuel burning and
other combustion processes, are large enough to cause global warming. This conclusion
has been extensively tested, winning a place at the core of modern climate science. [And there we have it people,related to the creator of all this horse dung DC]
So Greta just happens to be related to the father of modern climate science. Seriously?? That
pretty much flips Greta’s entire story on its head, doesn’t it? The media is not unaware of this
connection, mind you. There are a few sites out there that mention it, but they pass it off as a
funny coincidence, even claiming Greta was unaware of her relation to Arrhenius before she
became interested in climate change. If you’re naïve enough to believe that, you will believe
anything. [No kidding,this is good work on the part of the researcher DC]
I found this photograph of Arrhenius (right) with chemist Wilhelm Ostwald that appeared in
Popular Science Monthly. Ostwald is credited with the Ostwald process, used in the manufacture
of nitric acid. It was a breakthrough that enabled large-scale production of explosives, just in
time for World War I. Ostwald was also a big fan of eugenics, to give you an idea of his ilk.
The photo is an obvious fake. Why they faked this photo is beyond me. It may just be another
clue to those of us who are paying attention. Speaking of fake photos, Wikipedia tells us
Arrhenius was present at the first Solvay Conference in 1911, which was orchestrated to discuss
the emerging quantum theory of physics (need I say more?). The main photo from that
conference (below) is notoriously fake, as Josh over at Cutting Through the Fog has analyzed here.
Curiously, Arrhenius is not in this photograph, which further proves this photo (or the whole
conference) is a fraud.
Back to Greta Thunberg. We can pick up the thread of Greta’s genealogy through Arrhenius,
since he has a geni.com page. Immediately we notice that the name Arrhenius remains the
surname for many generations, going back to the mid-1700s. This is unusual for Swedish
families, where until recent times people’s last names signified their relationship to their father.
A girl whose father was Anders became an Andersdotter; a boy whose father was Peter became a
Petersson. So the last name changed every generation. But not so with Arrhenius, suggesting
they may have had non-Nordic roots. Arrhenius changes to Arenius a few generations back in
Arrhenius’s line, which likely links us to Olof Arenius, who was court painter for King Frederick
I of Sweden. Frederick I descended from the House of Hohenzollern, and thus from the Jewish
Jagiellons, which is a big red flag for Arenius. You don’t get tapped to be the highest-paid
painter in Sweden through sweat and skill alone. Just ask Miles. Arenius did the below portrait of
Anders Celsius, developer of the temperature measurement of the same name.
Besides being interested in men (as I presume from his portrait), Celsius was interested in rising
sea levels due to melting ice, so it’s fitting that his portraitist would be a relative of Arrhenius.
One of Arrhenius’s aunts was a Goldkuhl and, further back, a Roback. These may be Jewish
names. See Abraham Aaron Roback, Jewish psychologist who graduated from McGill
University and taught at MIT, both spook schools. Also Lea Roback, Jewish crusader against
“social inequality”. As for Goldkuhl, any name with “gold” in it is suspect. This aunt was also a
Kratz, descended from Count Ernst Kratz, whose mother was a Krutmeijer. More probable
Jewish names. Krutmeijer links us back to the Nobel Prize – see Eva Krutmeijer, former Head of
Information for the Nobel Prize who now works for a very spooky organization called Mistra
Geopolitics, an affiliate of the Sweden Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research and the
Stockholm Environment Institute. Why does environmental research need to be “strategic”? For
whom is it strategic? That word should always cause alarms to go off in your head. One of the
first questions we read on Mistra Geopolitics’ page on Global Challenges is: “What happens to
global trade when the ice continues to melt and open new transport routes in the Arctic?” Tell
me, does that sound like they’re interested in fighting climate change, or exploiting it?
In the genealogies we also find Stråle af Ekna, which turns out to be a family of Swedish
nobility. It was part of the unintroduced nobility, “mostly consisting of foreign nobility resident
in Sweden”, which confirms my suspicion that the ancestors of Arrhenius (and Greta) were not
originally Swedish. We learn more of the Stråle af Ekna family of Arrhenius’s line at this
Google-translated page. They were close associates of “Duke Carl” (King Charles IX of
Sweden), with one of them serving as herald at his coronation in 1607. Several of them were
agents of the Dutch East India Company. Names in their extensive family tree include Zelow,
Sandberg, Brauner/Braun, Marcks von Würtemberg, Nyman, Schmidt, Klint, Müller, Lundberg,
Widman, von Francken, Löwen, Schenfelt, Schmiedeberg, Weinheim, Roth, Bordon, Elfman,
Wester, Billingberg/Billing (like Lem Billings?), Berghman (think Ingrid), and Bröms (could
that be Brahms?). As you can tell, this family’s roots were not Swedish but German, and I
would say more Jewish than German. We actually get several links to Miles’ Bergman paper, if
we assume Widman = Wiedemann and Wester = Westerberg. We also get a familiar English
name in there: Monipenny.
They are also related to Mörners, which reminds us of Swedish climate change skeptic NilesAxel Mörner Just another coincidence, right?
Another big clue in the Jewish direction is that the Stråle af Ekna family is related to an Arrhane.
This indicates Arrhenius may be a Latinization of Arrhane, or Aarons.
So, what is really going on here? If we know Greta is an actress linked to the same Families that
are greedily ravishing our planet’s natural resources for profit, then what’s their game with
Greta? Is it merely an attempt to control the opposition and the narrative? Yes, that’s a big part
of it. But I think CO2 emissions are a red herring. I’m not a scientist so I’m not going out on a
limb to make any bold claims, but even if there is a true climate crisis caused by greenhouse
gases, it wouldn’t change the fact that the elites will profit mightily from efforts to reduce carbon
emissions. The problem can be real or fake; the “solution” will still rake in the tax dollars for
decades and justify the ever-ballooning federal budgets. Us Westerners won’t complain that 40-
50% (or more) of our income will be sucked up in taxes if we think it will prevent mass
extinction. It’s a familiar con, one we are reminded of every time we walk through a TSA body
scanner.[$$$$ Those scanners should be taken out on the sidewalks in front of airports at arrival and Sledgehammers provided, wake up people. DC]
The first clue hit me as I watched the video of Greta’s U.N. speech over at NBC News (linked at
the top of this paper). Actually, before I watched it. It was the annoying video ad they force you
to sit through, and this one was for Lenovo, where the narrator waxes on about how “smarter”
technology is better than “smart” technology. Then he says, “Smarter uses supercomputers to
fight climate change.” But the advertising didn’t stop there. It continued on with Greta’s speech: [Typical arrogance, takes a special kind of idiot to suggest fighting nature,creation if you want to know the truth.DC]
With today’s emissions levels, that remaining CO2 budget will be entirely gone within
less than eight and a half years…. Those numbers…also rely on my generation sucking
hundreds of billions of tons of your CO2 out of the air with technologies that barely
exist. [Did you catch what she said? In other words they have enough funding(the front groups in the non profit Industrial Complex) from the private funding to only last at the most 8.5 years.And the funding needed is off the charts because the sh^t we are going to use might be the stuff of fairy tales DC]
The message is hardly subtle: our global tax budgets aren’t big enough to handle the problem,
but there are emerging technologies that could help. Notice she doesn’t say technologies that
don’t exist, but rather barely exist. Nothing can barely exist – it either exists or it doesn’t. Of
course she means technologies that are currently being developed – by companies like Lenovo
and other manufacturers of electronics that are among the highest CO2 emitters. So the same
people who are creating the problem (if there is one) will be subsidized by our taxes to create
costly solutions that they can then sell to other companies and governments at a massive profit.
This is the textbook definition of a racket.
Greta has been placed in her position to misdirect from the obvious solution, which does not
require U.N. charters or new technologies or billions in new tax funding. The obvious solution is
for all of us to stop buying their products. Stop impulsively clicking the Amazon button every
time you want something. Stop expecting whatever you want to appear on your doorstep the next
day. Stop upgrading every year to the latest smartphone, smart pad, smart computer, smart
watch, smart TV, smart car, etc., all of which make you dumber and more subservient. Buy
things secondhand or locally made, or make your own things. Whatever you do, don’t outsource
your thoughts to machines or fake people like Greta.
Love what is good and hate what is evil. Addressing the U.N. members, Greta said, “If you really
understood the situation and still kept on failing to act, then you would be evil, and that I refuse
to believe.” But the truth is that they are evil. Stop refusing to believe it. But the first bit at least
is true. When you know the truth and fail to act, you will become evil like them. Not doing the
good you know to do is always the beginning of evil.
4 comments:
Interesting tale, but as to who she really is cannot be proven in this manner. Each generation and connection must be proven and documented.
Just as idiots claim that there is no proof that oxygen exist in the air until you've set up your own laboratory and weed out all other possible elements before claiming, OXYGEN EXISTS!!
Thank you for the inside look at the hypocritical hoaxers.
Carbon is the main building block of all things organic!!! The problem is with Industrial Toxins!!!...one of the main ones being FLUORIDE!!! Did we hear anything about Fluoride??? ***crickets!*** The BIGGER THE LIE, the EASIER IT IS TO TELL!!!
Pi$$e$ Me Off!!!
Post a Comment