Friday, October 9, 2020

Part 3b: ANCIENT SPOOKS..Link to a Spooky Past

ANCIENT SPOOKS Part III: 

Link to a Spooky Past 

By Gerry, July 2018

The Many Cities Tarshish 

Solomon also invested in the ships of Tarshish, from Isaiah’s and Ezekiel’s Laments for Tyre. Chronicles says that Solomon and Hiram sent ships of Tarshish to Tarshish ( 2 CHRON 9:21), which then bring home gold, silver, ivory, apes and peacocks every three years. Kings only says that the ships were of Tarshish ( 1 KING 10:22). Later, king Jehoshaphat in Chronicles sends ships to Tarshish ( 2 CHRON 20:36), while Kings tells the story as ships of Tarshish going to Ophir from Ezion-Geber at the Gulf of Aqaba ( 1 KING 22:48). Jonah embarks to Tarshish from Mediterranean Jaffa ( JONAH 1:3), so it can’t be the same place. The Tarshish from Ezekiel’s Lament for Tyre is then even translated as “Carthage” in the Greek Septuagint (Καρχηδόνιοι, in EZE 27:12, EZE 27:25, EZE 38:13). So where is Tarshish, and why do they all confuse it? Obviously, the many Biblical occurrences of Tarshish describe different locations, so there’s a lot of speculation about the actual location:  Tarsus in Cilicia,  Tarsos and Kato Tarsos in Ancient Corinth, Tartessos in Spain, and others. But we’ll see later that the network of Phoenician colonies was quite extensive. And since colonists of all times recycled names of their ports of origin (York and New York), I’d say Tarshish might well be ALL of these locations together, and possibly more! All have links to Phoenicia:  Cilician Tarsus traded with Phoenicia, and is in that pocket of Anatolia where Phoenician script popped up after The Collapse. Corinth owed much of its culture to the Phoenicians, and also traded extensively with the Phoenicians.And Tartessos was apparently a  larger region controlled by Phoenicia in Spain.

However, where was a mother city for all those Tarshish colonies? In Isaiah’s lament, mighty Tyre is called a daughter of Tarshish  ( ISA 23:10), just like it’s called a daughter of Sidon ( ISA 23:12). So, the Mother-Tarshish would be one of the most powerful Phoenician city-states, located somewhere in the Phoenician heartland! English Wiki gives a clue:  “ Tarshish (Lebanon) is the name of a village in Lebanon”. If the name still floats around there, Ancient Tarshish might have been close by. On a map you can see both Tarchich and neighboring Maj Tarchich  on hills overlooking Beirut, halfway on the path towards the trade hub Baalbek. This would be a prime location to log valuable cedar wood, and cut it into pieces from which to assemble the ships in their future ports. “Ships of Tarshish” would then have been a synonym for these high-quality vessels. Apparently, some ancient ship types were even built for disassembly and reassembly, as evidenced by the Egyptian Khufu Ship. Egyptians used cedar ships that could be assembled and disassembled for their Punt expeditions as early as the Old Kingdom period, roughly 2000 BC. It’s possible that Jehoshaphat’s ships came from the Phoenician Mother-Tarshish in pieces, and were assembled at Ezion-Geber  ( 1 KING 22:48). 

If there was an ancient ship-building facility at today’s humble Tarchich, it could yield fascinating insights. Lebanon is dotted with Tells where even archaic Neolithic settlements are excavated. But to my knowledge, no excavation has been conducted at Tarchich. Why? 26s

You perhaps noticed that  Tarshish is also a family name, and a party founded by what appears to be an Israeli fake terrorist. The name seems connected to top spook aristocrats. What does it mean? Many terms are offered to misdirect, but there’s a  straightforward one: tor shish (שיש תר) ,a white dove! The spelling is identical to the last letter: TRŠYŠ–TR ŠYŠ, תרשיש–שיש תר .Recall that Jonah embarked to Tarshish ( JONAH 1:3). What does the name  Jonah mean? Dove. Another word, same bird. “Dove” embarked to “White Dove”. 

Would there be any Phoenician depictions of doves? Amazingly: Yes! And they even used it for something we rarely catch them at: spirituality. The baby boy from Sidon’s Eshmun temple seems to hold a dove, though it’s photographed from an angle where you can barely make it out. However, there’s another baby boy from the same temple where the  dove in his hand is well visible. Late Palmyra used the same symbolism. There are also votive steles from Carthage  with doves on them.



In our collective memory, the white dove is associated with Noah’s ship-building, with the Holy Spirit of Christianity, and with peace in general. Is there something wrong if pagans used the same symbol? I’d say no. The dove clearly doesn’t stand for Tarshish in these depictions. The Phoenician artists only used it to express what they and their customers believed in. I think religions and cultures may share symbols, while differing in other aspects of their beliefs, so to me this is not a problem. 

But we shouldn’t forget that the Punic people were professional punkers, and loved their symbols to have more than one meaning. The “white dove” might have been popular with them because it was both: A spiritual symbol, and also the name of a major city-state, whose ships enabled them to colonize of the entire known world. Homing pigeons might have helped with colonization, and were already used in Ancient Mesopotamia. The Latin word for dove is  “columbus”. It may be dawning on us why many Tells in Lebanon are left unexcavated. More surprises may be slumbering there. 

The ŠLM Family of Names 

As Solomon and Hiram have almost no family members given, we cannot search there for a Phoenician-Israelite genealogy. The mightiest tool that remains to us are name similarities, because the aristocrats are so fond of their names, they insert them into all historical records, even religious ones, as we saw. When I looked for names similar to “Solomon”, I noticed something odd… 

In Hebrew, Solomon is written  ŠLMH (שלמה .(The first similarity is that to Jerusalem, written YRWŠLM (ירושלם) .The ancient name of Jerusalem is theorized to be  Salem, as a city from Abraham’s time  is called Salem. That would explain why so many towns all over the world were named Salem, not the least of which is Miles’ famous witch-hoax Salem. Jerusalem is ancient, settled around 4500 BC. 

Solomon and Jerusalem share the ŠLM word root (שלם) ,meaning  peace, prosperity, completeness, alliance, and related things. It’s also a  name of God, as those in my previous list! I counted 15 ŠLM names in the Bible, indexed by Strong from 8004 Salem(שלמ) to  8022 Shalmaneser (שלמנסר). The last two,  ŠLMN (שלמן (and ŠLMNSR(שלמנסר) ,are interesting, as they are Assyrian kings. 

There are five known  Assyrian kings called Shalmaneser. The Biblical king is thought to be Shalmaneser V who reigned 727–722 BC. The first Assyrian Shalmaneser was  Shalmaneser I who lived 1274–1245 BC and  left inscriptions: Among his officials, another name with the ŠLM root appears: Šulmanu-qarrad. What’s “Šulmanu”? 

Shulmanu  is explained as a god of “underworld, fertility, and war” – closely related concepts! And all Semitic peoples worshiped him. Then there’s the bold claim that he was found in 2000 BC. But there’s no real record of that god anywhere! 

The earliest Mesopotamian ŠLM name I found is Suhlamu, an Assyrian king from the list of “kings who lived in tents”, who lived before 2000 BC. That’s the number they cited, but it’s a king, not a god! Another is king  Shalim-ahum who reigned ca. 1900 BC. So, my take is that it wasn’t really a god, just an aristocratic name. 

Wikipedia says Shulmanu is  known from Phoenician Sidon. Is that Phoenician Shulmanu found somewhere? While  the ŠLM family even has its own Wikipedia page, few members are listed. A mythology book provides a much better  summary of the ŠLM names from all over the Fertile Crescent and beyond. But I found more: There’s a Canaanite deity  Shalim. and  Salman, a god worshiped in Arabia. The name frequently  appears in epigraphic texts dedicated  “to Salman”, varied as  masculine, feminine, singular, dual, plural, diminutive in  Sabean and Qatabanic inscriptions. The heyday of Saba and Qataban came after Solomon opened these trade routes, so here the ŠLM deity appeared after the ŠLM rulers. It’s therefore speculated that Salman was perhaps a deified hero. In Part IV, we’ll find ŠLM names in Greece. 

Are there more links to Phoenicia? Shulmanu is  “ known from Bronze Age inscriptions at Sidon”. I tracked that down to Louvre exhibit AO 1759, the  “Abdmiskar Offering” dated 200-150 BC, found on the Louvre website, , with a larger image here, a transcript here.The given translation is: 

This is the offering which Abdmiskar made, acting chief of the assembly, second in command, son of Baalsaloh, to his lord Shalman. May he bless him! 

hmnḥt aš ytn obdmskr rb obr lspt rb šny bn bolṣlḥ ladny lšlmn ybrk המנחת אש יתן עבדמסכר רב עבר לספת רב שני בן בעלצלח לאדני לשלמן יברך 

Unlike Shulmanu, Solomon and the Assyrian kings were historical persons. Are there historical Phoenicians named ŠLM? Yes there are! Phoenician ŠLM name examples are  Shelamin and BaalShalem. The name  Baal-ŠLM even appears in Ugarit texts. A “Collection of Phoenician inscriptions” cites more appearances of Baal-ŠLM. The name appears on ostraca. ŠLM-Baal appears  on Neo-Punic inscriptions and on amphorae. Are there even Phoenician kings named Baal-ŠLM? Yes there are! And it’s  two kings of Phoenician Sidon, where Shalmanu was worshiped as a god. They’re spelled Baal-ŠLM, which you could vowelize as Solom, Salem, Shalom. The official reading is Baal-Shillem, which looks like a purposeful fudge. The names were found at the Eshmun temple in Sidon, , on an inscription  dated roughly 400 BC, on the slab under the  baby boy with the dove. A transcript can be  found here.

This statue has been given by Baal-Shillem son of king Baana king of the Sidonians son of king Aber-Amun king of the Sidonians son of king Baal-Shillem king of the Sidonians to the Lord to Eshmun at fountain Ydil. May he be blessed! 

hsml z ʾš ytn bʿlšlm bn mlk bʿnʾ mlk ṣdnm bn mlk ʿbrʾmn mlk ṣdnm bn mlk bʿlšlm mlk ṣdnm lʾrny lʾšmn bʿn ydl ybrk הסמל ז אש יתן בעלשלם בן מלך בענא מלך צדנם בן מלך עבראמן מלך צדנם בן מלך בעלשלם מלך צדנם לארני לאשמן בען ידל יברך 

I’m not claiming that the members of the ŠLM family are literally related. But they prove a wider connection between Ancient Israel and Ancient Phoenicia, and other regions beyond. And the different vowelizations of the very same letters ŠLM prove that the elites don’t want us to see that! 

Answered Questions 

Before we spread out too much, let’s stop for a moment, and think about what all this really means. Why Phoenicia? Why that region? Why the connection of spookery and trade? I will share here my grand theory, my attempt to explain it all. I haven’t had the time to fully research the pre-Biblical periods yet, so it’s just a working hypothesis. 

It goes thus: 

The ancestors of our modern spooks were the top ruling families of Ancient Phoenicia, and of the Ancient Fertile Crescent at large, who united into one single bloc through their economic and family ties, ruled via trade and resource monopolies, and then rolled out this system to the rest of the planet, in the first big step via naval colonization originating from Ancient Phoenicia. 

Why this specific theory? 

I don’t think it’s a coincidence that spookery can be traced back to the Fertile Crescent, and Phoenicia specifically. Their region was blessed with a hot climate, fertile soil, plus abundant water through seasonal flooding of Nile, Euphrates and Tigris. But to harness that, and overcome flood and drought seasons, the people had to build vast irrigation canal networks. And for that, they had to work together in very large collectives, and so formed these collectives earlier than others, out of necessity. They thus had a head start on civilization as we define it: With large settlements came specialization, and tools, and complex administration, and writing. And steep hierarchies. And a more powerful aristocracy. 

Miles found out that spookery didn’t start with the CIA, but goes back unchanged for centuries. And if I was to single out the one piece of new information we got out of all the ancient punnery I found, then I’d say it’s this: Spookery goes back almost unchanged for millennia! The spooks who rule our world reference Ancient Israel. It was surely a great country, but never looked overly advanced or powerful to me. I always wondered how all this weirdness could have evolved from there. Now I have replaced Ancient Israel with Ancient Phoenicia. Is that any better? 

I think Yes! I think it makes a huge difference if we replace “Ancient Israel” with “Ancient Phoenicia” or the “Ancient Fertile Crescent” to include Mesopotamia and Egypt: These regions were indeed advanced and powerful, the most advanced and powerful of their time! The Ancient Spookians were not humble nomads, but almighty kings and overlords. Power simply begets more power! 

If we would assume that the world was really conquered by top dogs from above, and not by underdogs from below, then we could answer some recurring questions which always puzzled me about those lazy, sloppy, silly spook aristocrats, who are mostly bumbling along, faking their deaths: 

• How did these people get so insanely powerful? Answer: They didn’t! They were ultra powerful already in the Bronze Age, and have mostly inherited that. 

• How did these people get so insanely wealthy? Answer: They didn’t! They were ultra wealthy already in the Bronze Age, and have mostly inherited that. 

• How did these people erect a global empire? Answer: They didn’t! They had a global empire already in the Bronze Age, thanks to the Phoenician monopoly on durable wood and ship-building technology, and have mostly inherited that. 

• How did these people overcome all opposition? Answer: They didn’t! There never was any meaningful opposition. Once the aristocracies of the most advanced civilizations made a pact and formed a bloc, the rest of humanity was toast. 

• How did these people conquer all the world? Answer: They didn’t! They were rich enough to simply buy under-developed regions from local rulers, and let these rulers join the gravy train, by grafting them onto the global family tree. 

• How did these people manage to avoid leaving incriminating written evidence? Answer: They didn’t! They didn’t have to! People outside the Fertile Crescent hadn’t even invented script. All people who could read and write were either in-the-know aristocrats from the Fertile Crescent, or their clerks. A few puns would suffice to deter literate commoners. [And by the time of later history, as now, such a pile of confusing and tangled data had accumulated that no one could sort through it.] 

• How did these people manage to achieve the power and wealth they had in the Bronze Age? Answer: They didn’t! That’s simply a “regular” aristocratic inheritance, that likely goes back into pre-history. The first ziggurats and pyramids were erected already under their cushioned royal behinds! 

It seems these loafers never ever really achieved anything in the entirety of history. Aliens from outer space could check off this planet as “confirmed” for the power-begets-power hypothesis. I think the only three things the spook aristocracy ever “invented” were: 

1. Global Trade. 

2. How to scam their subjects. 

3. After millennia of intra-aristocratic bickering and backstabbing, how to achieve some sort of truce among each other, while continuing to scam their subjects. 

You’ll notice that this requires very little technology. The only required ingredients are humans, available since the Apeman Age. So the aristocrats had, and likely needed, many millennia of prehistory to get their act together. Script was invented for inventory lists, because temple bureaucrats couldn’t keep track any more of  all the stuff and people they controlled. “Regular” top down corruption and scamming was thus likely already invented in prehistory. 

Naturally, this does not mean that all of history, or civilization, is false or fake. The un-recorded history of us little people is genuine. We carried the civilization that archaeologists excavate. And only a tiny part of recorded history is false, namely the part that portrays rich and powerful people as independent, while they’ve really long since agglutinated into one global blob of hoaxdom. 

I don’t know when that inter-aristocratic pact formed, but I think it was in historic times. Writing letters may have helped with relations among aristocrats of different regions. But I think the institution that ultimately allowed these connections was likely another one: Global Trade. There’s nothing bad about trade in general. But global trade, of things not easily substituted, turns quickly into a global monopoly, as it hands the key to entire nations to groups of rich and powerful people. 

Remember that I claimed the Fertile Crescent was blessed with hot climate, abundant water and fertile soil? Well, those were the only things it had, plus clay. Mesopotamia was very resource poor—even stone and wood had to be fetched from far away. I think that’s why Fertile Crescent people traded very far, very early. As with their large settlements, this was a necessity. 

It’s amazing what distances were covered by trade even in archaic times. A famous example is Ancient Egypt’s import of lapis lazuli from Afghanistan, attested as early as  3000 BC during the reign of 1st dynasty pharaoh Djer! Mediterranean Bronze may have been traded from Great Britain. may have been traded from Great Britain. Later classical Greek and Roman elites clothed themselves in  silk from China. Global trade like this would have started as a chain of many intermediaries, but if wares could travel along these chains, informations, people and aristocratic spookery could as well. 

How was this trade organized? Trade “agreements” are among the first attested international contracts. Local rulers had to give merchants of the great city-states free passage, extraterritorial rights, and  compensation if they were robbed, because the roads hadn’t been made safe enough! The lopsidedness of this “free” trade is seen clearly in Kanesh, an early  Assyrian merchant colony ( karum )in Hittite Anatolia: Local rulers had to recompense Assyrian merchants for any robbery, but if Assyrian merchants themselves were caught with crimes, they could always be bailed out. The local ruler also had to vouch for his peoples’ debt and turn them over as debt-slaves, while  indebted Assyrians enjoyed special protection. Then as now, grand merchants and investors carried virtually no risk, while pocketing the same “risk” premium as smaller competitors! [debt slaves...exact same thing the communist FDR hoisted upon the American people in 1933...wake up from your slumber people DC]

It was a global trend: Other “Free” Trade Zones swallowed up the cities around them and  became the actual government. Why does the Code of Hammurabi  hang in the US Congress? Because like many laws and contracts from the time, it contained just such “Free” Trade provisions  shielding financiers and owners from risk, burdening governors instead, who then tax it from “the people”: 

§23. If the highwayman has not been caught, the man that has been robbed shall state on oath what he has lost and the city or district governor in whose territory or district the robbery took place shall restore to him what he has lost. 

Not saying Hammurabi was as bad a ruler as today’s congressmen. In theory his laws would also benefit small merchants. But his allegiances were clearly with the rich and ultra-rich folks, his peers. I haven’t yet decided if he was part of the global “spook” system, but signs are there: Just like the Bible narrative concentrates on Hebrew nomads, Hammurabi’s family is cast as Amorites, another nomadic people from the Levant, who had conquered mighty Babylon, but allegedly “waged war on each other for control of fertile agricultural land”, as if they were still shepherds. Judging from his laws, they were anything but. The name  Hammurabi also occurs with rulers of neighboring merchant empires, most notably Ugarit, just North of later Phoenicia. Coincidentally, roughly at the time of the Babylonian and Ugarit Hammurabi's, Egypt had been conquered by so called Hyksos, also from the Levant and traditionally styled as violent axe-swinging  “shepherd kings”. Archeology is increasingly deconstructing that made-up image, showing they were really merchants and traders. And as usual,  destruction layers are missing for alleged destructions. 

If I were to give a date at which some global pact between top aristocrats was made, I’d say it was somewhere around 1600 BC, when apparently aristocrats from the Levant had achieved, or been given, reign over both Mesopotamia and Egypt. I still don’t know what exactly happened there. I suppose Levantine merchant princes were the initiators, but it was likely not a drive-by takeover as later with the illiterate Europeans. I hypothesize it to be some merger, with all aristocratic parties bringing some tradition to the table: Egyptian and Mesopotamian templars their bureaucracies, and Levantine operators their global reach. 

These links to Mesopotamia and Egypt may be today downplayed even towards lesser spooklings, judging from  Hammurabi’s controversial “rediscovery” and from the way Gardiner’s harmless transcriptions are buried. But there might be a wealth of archaic scamming practices inherited from those advanced empires: Did you know that Mesopotamian elites early on invented the custom to  switch their king for an actor double, called “substitute king” (šar pūḫi), who wouldn’t rule but merely enact the king to the public? As with the Nazir, that actor was serving a fixed term. He was officially of low birth and would later be killed (or fake-killed: deported). Talk about actors who fake their own death. We don’t even need to mention Egyptian rulers, who regularly impersonated gods.

So, I think aristocrats all over the world had invented their own ways of scamming their subjects, and may have combined them. Ultimately though, spookdom chose as its dominant mode of governing the “merchant prince” scam: global trade monopolies, monetized through wars and crises, manufactured or created by willful negligence. Why? I think we already know: The traditional temple bureaucracies were deceptive and unfair, but stable. If they taxed away the loafer premium for the aristocrats directly, commoners would passively resist, and over time figure out ways to hide their stuff. But with periodic wars and crises, people were caught off-guard. And with a global monopoly, they would then have no choice but to actively go to the economic overlords and voluntarily hand over everything they had, for food. We read it in Part I. 

That was my personal explanation. You don’t have to like it or believe it. If you have another good explanation, all the better. To confirm or refute it, I’ll have to dig deeper into the archaic times. But whatever the real explanation, I think it has something to do with aristocrats acting as merchants and financiers, and with them somehow working together, as these are the central discoveries of Miles. 

The Unanswered Question 

So I developed this theory of spookery coming from Ancient Phoenicia, and not Ancient Israel. I think it answers some questions, as outlined above. However, it opens up a new question: If Ancient Israel was not the actual, ultimate identity of the Ancient Spooks, if the Ancient Hebrews were spooked just like the rest of us, then why do we have all these references to Israel? 

This is not about if the spooks would lie to us, or assume fake identities, or falsify their own history. Yes, yes, yes, they’d do all these things, and they’ve done them innumerable times. However, the Bible verses I cited that contain puns or references to Phoenicia, were obviously cherry-picked. For the most part, the Bible seems to be what it says on the tin. But aristocrats are self-absorbed, and want every little tidbit of history to be about themselves. Why would they use a Biblical nation as a mask, and promote Biblical scripture to be the central pivot point of history, if it wasn’t about themselves? [Hence the murder of Michael over 2000 years...to fulfill the scriptures DC]

I have to admit that for a while I thought the crypto-“Jewish” shtick was a deep-state internal scam, played on half-in-the-know lesser spooks. When I first saw the cheerful dopeyness of fake event crisis actors on video, I thought that in addition to extra pay, they had been brainwashed into believing it was for a non-corrupt cause. Like they’re humanity’s secret shepherds who bring about a holy kingdom, even though their “kings” really conquered the planet millennia ago. Well, I don’t think that any more. You can’t employ people to scam humanity and prevent them from realizing they’re scammed themselves. You’re not that gullible, are you, spooklings? You know you’re working for corrupt descendants of self-proclaimed merchant princes and god kings, right? 

So my central explanation is still that the Bible has simply been heavily edited and censored before it was frozen into its current form. I hope you can at least consider that possibility, after all I’ve shown you. Ancient Israel and Ancient Phoenicia were neighbors and shared most of their culture and language. Virtually all Hebrew names are also Phoenician names, and the few “Baal” names that aren’t have been censored. Stories that were too “Phoenician” may also have been censored, like the Book of Solomon. The original version of the Bible may thus have been a very “Phoenician” one. 

Other than that, I don’t know. I won’t say “I have no idea”, because I have tons of ideas. Only not much evidence, with most records “lost”. I have, however, still found some links between Israel and Phoenicia. I’ll share these here with you, since there’s nothing bad about good relations between two neighboring countries. The bad thing is what the spooks have made out of it. 

The Link across the Fertile Crescent 

One clue is that both Phoenicia and Israel use symbolisms of neighboring Mesopotamia and Egypt. For many historians, partnership and trade are mostly unmentioned non-events, sadly. But it seems both Phoenicia and Israel were highly integrated economically and culturally with the entire Fertile Crescent, and with each other. If Israel was a lot “like” Phoenicia, it might have become an acceptable substitute identity for the spooks. 

In today’s world, only the Phoenician-“Jewish” part is left. But especially Egyptian symbols were there in the early days. It may be copying for commercial purposes, but it also shows that the Phoenicians had not obliterated their mighty neighbors. Rather, they were all linked. Egyptian elites mounted their own  trade expeditions and colonization ventures, before classical Phoenicia. 


Here’s the  Medallion of Trayamar, dated 600 BC, from Phoenician Spain: The birds might be Egyptian falcons with flails. And the two cobras below are likely two Egyptian  Uraeus Serpents. The  Winged Sun Disc above appeared in both Egypt and Mesopotamia. The same symbols, plus a sphinx, are on the so-called “Jezebel seal”, of  unknown origin, and dated 800 BC. All symbols but the birds are on Phoenician seals found on  Ibiza, Sardinia, and Byblos.

Sarcophagi from Ancient Phoenicia and Ancient Israel. Have you seen this style anywhere before? 
Another great example is the Sidonian Eshmunazar sarcophagus from about 500 BC. The script is Phoenician, but note the goatee, headdress and the falcon on the shoulder. Similar sarcophagi were found in Gaza, , Israel, dated 1300 BC. Can you guess which nation’s style the sarcophagi exhibit? 

My answer would be: Egypt! And I don’t think this was shallow copying. The aristocrats likely understood many of the puns. There’s a  4th century BC woman on a sarcophagus from Carthage, in Greek style, but with a falcon on her head. I’d say it’s a pun: The Egyptian word for  Horus is ḥr, but the same word ḥr also means face. The spelling is even interchangeable. That’s not a coincidence: This type of falcon has a very distinctive white face. As you can see  from the examples, “face” in ancient Egyptian had the meaning of English “head”: highest, topmost, the head guy who’s heading something. ḥr also means “appearance”, so it might pun with fakery. I haven’t figured out many Egyptian puns, but many Fertile Crescent aristocrats seem to have used them. 

Two artifacts are of special importance for Israel: Hezekiah’s seals. There are so many exaggerated expectations heaped onto Ancient Israel that every excavated artifact is immediately  alleged to be a forgery. I honestly can’t tell, so let’s just analyze what the artists, whoever they were, wanted to say. 

While Hezekiah’s father Ahaz has his  seal on Wikipedia, Hezekiah’s own seal has no entry. There is one misleading photograph of an  older find without imagery. You can imagine why they’d want to hide the imagery of the newer finds: The symbols are Egyptian again! 

The first seal impression features the Winged Sun Disc, plus Egyptian Ankh symbols left and right. The second one has an Egyptian-style Winged Scarab which is even holding up its little ball. More impressions of the same seal have been found. Naturally,  Phoenician seals are also full of Egyptian iconography. I found one  dated 600 BC inscribed L-BLTH, “of Baal-Tah”. 

The winged scarab is not an outlier: Many LMLK jar handles from Ancient Israel use scarabs as well They made  modern stamps only from the motif where you can’t discern what the 2-winged “scroll” is (some look like Winged Suns). But the 4 -winged ones of them are clearly  identifiable as scarabs There are many more such amulets from the time when the Levant was an Egyptian colony. 



Hebron LMLK jar handle (top), Hezekiah’s 2 seals (middle), Phoenician seal (bottom) 
I think that these seals are either genuine, or at least convey a genuine truth: The entire Levant, including Israel and Phoenicia, had deep cultural and economic ties to both Mesopotamia and Egypt. Judging from what Miles has found out, there were also deep family ties among the aristocracy. 

Is there more? While old papyrus records were burned with the palaces, cuneiform tablets harden in fire, so incriminating internal records might have been preserved in ancient merchant cities like Palmyra, Ugarit, Mari, Ebla. We are sure to find more buried links as we dig deeper into archaic history. As will the  spooks themselves, who seem to be in a hurry.

The City Zion 

Ancient Phoenicia and Ancient Israel were also closely linked through a city. I am going to show you that one major city of Israel very likely had a twin city in Phoenicia. They even shared a common name, which meant “Phoenicia”. I am talking about Zion. This doesn’t concern the religious meaning of Zion. The Zion that people believe in is simply just that. This is about the aristocrats, and about explaining why they like the term so much. Zion is said to be a  synonym for Jerusalem, and thus for Israel. The first oddity is that this is nowhere stated explicitly. Zion is first introduced when David conquers a fortress with that name: 

Then David and all Israel went to Jerusalem (that is, Jebus); and the Jebusites, the inhabitants of the land, were there. 1 CHRON 11:4 

The inhabitants of Jebus said to David, “You shall not enter here.” Nevertheless David captured the stronghold of Zion (that is, the city of David).  1 CHRON 11:5

These two verses say that Jerusalem is Jebus, and that Zion is the city of David. That Jerusalem is also Zion isn’t said here or anywhere else. Jerusalem and Jebus are brought up together numerous times in the books Joshua, Judges, Samuel, but Zion is mentioned for the first time here. It’s also mentioned for the last time as a physical location: one verse is copied in  2 SAM 5:7, and there’s one mention in  1 KING 8:1 of the ark being carried out of Zion. But from then on, Zion ceases to be a concrete location in actual events, and becomes an abstract poetic allegory for Jerusalem and the holy land. 

There’s nothing wrong with using this poetic name. But the fact that it’s unspecific and its origin not well explained would also be a chance for the aristocrats to interpret their own ideas into it. One set of people whom I suspect of misusing the term Zion is the so-called Zionists. Don’t get me wrong: I am thankful for the founding of modern Israel which I think was a blessing for many regular Jews. But I don’t think the Zionist leaders were regular Jews. They were elitists! Just look at how Theodor Herzl describes the people who would later labor so hard to build his envisioned Jewish state: He views common-folk workers as people who should be  milked by a Company truck system, supervised by Company military to quell their mutinies, and clothed neatly in mandatory suits which can be paid off by working overtime for The Company

Most of all, the Zionists weren’t known as religious: They thought in terms of concrete plans, profitability, and feasibility. From all the names of the ancient Jewish lands, why did they chose for their movement the most abstract, most poetic, most religious: Zion? Why is the city and nation called Zion so loved by ultra-rich aristocratic merchants, financiers and colonists who rule much of the world? Here’s my theory: They secretly read it as Zidon, which was a city of ultra-rich aristocratic merchants, financiers and colonists who ruled much of the world. 

Zidon, or Sidon,  stood for a global commercial empire, and is often understood to mean Phoenicia in the Bible, just like Canaan. Zidon was spelled ṢDN in early Phoenician inscriptions, but was later vowelized to  ṢYDWN. If you drop the D, then it becomes Zion, spelled  ṢYWN. If you drop the same D from the Zidonians (צידונים) ,i.e. the Phoenicians, they become the Zionists (ציונים!) The omission of the D works in Hebrew, Greek and Latin: צידון-ציון ,Σιδών-Σιων, Zidon-Zion. I use the Z-spelling to demonstrate this. The modern Hebrew pronunciation of Tsade is “ts”. 

Would they do that? Drop a central consonant? There’s a verse hinting they might’ve done just that. 

the LORD loves the gates of Zion more than all the dwelling places of Jacob. PSALM 87:2 אהב יהוה שערי ציון מכל משכנות יעקב 

Sounds unfair to those other places. But there’s more to this verse: Another word for “gates” is “doors”: dalet(דלה) .Another word for “dwelling place” is “house”:  bayit (בית) .Coincidentally, Dalet and Bet are also the Semitic letters D and B, derived from the very words and glyphs for “door” and “house”. If we were to substitute those words, the sentence would read “...loves the D of Zion more than the B of Jacob”. Only Zion didn’t have a D. Or did it, as Zidon? 

Mt. Hermon, Mt. Zion and Mt. Zidon 

The one piece of information about the fortress Zion is that it was invaded through some waterway ( 2 SAM 5:8), called  zinur(צנור) .There is only one other occurrence of this word in the Bible, where it’s translated as waterfalls, specifically those of Mount Hermon. 

But the main oddity is Mount Zion. That famous mountain, speculated to be  named after the fortress Zion, is officially  affixed to at least three different hills. Why did a hill which is not described, with a fortification which is not described, become the symbol for a city, a nation, and a religion? 

Even though Mount Zion is officially a hill at Jerusalem in the South, it is in one verse described as being very high, and in the North. 

Beautiful in elevation, the joy of the whole earth, Is Mount Zion in the far north, The city of the great King.  PSALM 48:2

There’s a puzzling verse about Mount Hermon’s dew coming down on the “mountains of Zion”: 

It is like the dew of Hermon coming down upon the mountains of Zion; For there the LORD commanded the blessing– life forever.  PSALM 133:3

Mount Hermon is high indeed, in the North, and close to Phoenician Zidon, but not to Jerusalem. The verse is sometimes explained as dew evaporating in the North, and raining down in the South. A second given explanation is that Zion here is a wrong spelling, or another name for Hermon, in the Bible also named Senir, Sirion, Shion, all somewhat similar but not quite close to Zion and Zidon. The most straightforward explanation is never given: That the mountains of Zion here are really the mountains of Zidon, since that is where Hermon is actually located. Naturally dew from Hermon would rain down on the lower mountains of Zidon. 

If there are “mountains of Zidon”, is there also a Mount Zidon? Apparently, the answer is yes. It’s mentioned in some texts, though it’s very few. Zidon still stands today, but with the Arabic name Zaida, so the similarity is gone. Do local Lebanese folk perhaps call some peak Mount Zaida? Hard to tell, because the Zidon municipality started to pile trash into a heap on the shore,  dubbed “Mount Zaida” by the media, so all search engine hits to actual mountains are now literally buried under tons of rubbish. Smart move. 

Arabic histories of the crusades do mention a Mount Zaida though.One  history of Lebanon places a Mount Zaida (صأيدا جأبل) in the Chouf (الأشوف) district bordering Zidon. If I translate the Arabic text correctly, another history citing the  “Hanbali” scholar Ibn al-Jawzi relates how 500 Franks descended from Mount Zaida to attack Jezzine, which lies between Mount Hermon and Zidon. 

The nephew of the Hungarian descended from Mount Zaida with 500 Franks to Jezzine ،وأما ابن أخت الهنكر فقصد جبل صيدا في خمسمائةٍ من الفرنج إلى جزين 

There’s English versions, but they don’t dare to say  from where exactly the 500 Franks descended.37s

What about ancient Hebrew texts? There’s a passage about the First Jewish-Roman War, found in a chapter “Kings of the Second Temple” (שני בית מלכי דברי) inside a compendium, in some versions of “De Bello Judaico” by Josephus, and in “Tredecim articuli fidei iudaeorum” citing Josephus. Text and spelling vary, so I translate the best I can. The context seems to be about Jerusalem’s elders fleeing from cruel Roman retribution after Eleazar son of Ananias has started the hostilities. 

They fled from Jerusalem when they saw the savagery of Nero’s Romans, escaped to Mount Zidon and stayed there. 

ברחו מירושלם כי יראו מנירון ומאכזריו רומיי וינוסו אל הר צידון וישבו שם Quod cum uidissent seniores Israel et alii sapientes atos pii, fugerunt ab Hierusalem, timentes Nerone and seuitiam Romanorum. Fugerunt autem at monte Zidon and manserunt ibi. 

But Eleazar and all the bandits accompanying him heard about the assembled elders and leaders, and that they were on Mount Zidon, and they went there, fought them, and destroyed of them a great multitude. 

וישמעו אלעזר וכל הפריצים הנלוי איו כי נסו זקני העם וראשיהם וכי הם בהר צידון וילכו אליהם וילחמו בם וישחיתו מהם עם רב מאד Porro cum audissent Eleazar and complices ei adhaerantes, quod fugissent seniores populi and capita eorum, and quod essent in monte Zidon, abierunt ad eos, and pugnates contra eos, interemer ut multum populum ex eis. 

The one English version I found, in “Generations of the Ages", also names it “Mount Sidon”. 

Seeing this, the leaders of Israel, the sages, and the pious fled Jerusalem, because they feared Nero and the cruelty of the Romans. They fled to Mount Sidon and settled there. When Eleazar and his rebels heard that the leaders and the heads of the people had fled to Mount Sidon, they followed them there, fought them, and killed many of them. 

What is that Mount Zidon they’re fleeing to? We’d expect a Mount Zidon to be close to Zidon and Jezzine, somewhere around Mount Hermon. From Jerusalem, that’s three days travel. Does it make sense for elders to flee from Jerusalem to the region of Zidon, and for their pursuers to immediately find them there in the mountains? 

Zidon Rabah and Zidon Haaretz 

We can also locate that Mount Zidon in Hebrew texts: The book  “Borders of Israel” (ארץ גבולות ישראל) by  Ibn Daud who lived 1110 BC equates a Mount Zidon Rabah (רבה צידון הר ,(meaning “Great Zidon”, with a Mount Dshizin (דשיזין הר.) 

...to the west of Mount Zidon Rabah (G) which is Mount Dshizin למערב ממנו הר צידון רבה )ג( הוא הר דשיזין 

The name Great Zidon also occurs in Joshua’s Biblical conquests  ( JOSH 11:8, JOSH 19:28). Why was Zidon great? It was probably 2 places: Sennacherib mentions on his prism that he conquered both Great Zidon and Little Zidon (Ṣi-du-un-nu rabû, Ṣi-du-un-nu ṣiḫru). It’s often explained by saying that Zidon had a second settlement a little further inland, inland, as with Tyre. But if the 2 Zidon settlements were next to each other as those of Tyre, would it make sense then to mention them separately, while there is no mentioning anywhere of a Great Tyre or Little Tyre? 

Dshizin in that text is probably an old spelling for Jezzine. Mount Zidon would then be at Jezzine, an ancient merchant stronghold connecting Zidon to trade routes in the mountains. It’s the hometown of the humble storeowner father of Carlos Slim . (ŠLM family?), likely the world’s wealthiest rags-to-riches biography faker. And curiously, Jezzine is famous for its impressive waterfalls.These would seamlessly connect to the dew of Mount Hermon coming down on the mountains of Zion, and to the fortress of Zion being attacked through waterways or waterfalls. It would also be a fitting location for “Little” Zidon, being smaller than coastal Zidon. But the book Borders of Israel explicitly equates Dshizin with the “Great” Zidon, not the “Little” one. 

From the city Zidon Rabah (Dshizin), which is at its northern end, returning southwards to Ramah and the fortress of Tyre מעיר צידון רבה )דשיזין( שהיא בקצהו הצפוני שב הנגבה לרמה ואל מבצר צור 

So was Jezzin secretly “greater” than famous coastal Zidon? It’s possible, but I think not. Hebrew rab can also mean “great space”. And Akkadian ṣiḫru, translated as small, is close to siḫḫāru which denotes flat things such as a plate. My personal guess would thus be that rabû and ṣiḫru refer to heights here: Upper Zidon and Lower Zidon, which would be Jezzine in the mountains, and Zidon at the coast. It would be the right distance to share one name, and far enough to be mentioned separately. The Phoenician names would be Zidon Rabah and Zidon Haaretz (צידון ,ארץ צידון רבה ,(as the latter occurs  in the Eshmunazar inscription.

If you look at Jezzine on a map, you’ll see that it sits on top of a mountain looking towards coastal Zidon. Since those 500 Franks descended onto Jezzine from Mount Zidon, that would be the mountain further up. It’s today called  Taoumat Jezzine (جأزيأن تومأات) ,logged clean, and could be the ancient Mount Zidon. The Zaida-Jezzine road would have been a Zidon-Zidon road. 

Note that all these medieval texts say nothing about Zion, only that a Mount Zidon existed, and that Jezzine was called Zidon Rabah. Why then are these texts buried, and this straightforward solution for the puzzle of Sennacherib’s two Zidons hidden away? I say the spooks likely wanted to hide Zidon Rabah and Mount Zidon, because people would notice a similarity with Zion and Mount Zidon. 

I’m wary of theories alleging that Biblical cities were all located someplace else, since so far I found the geographies pretty consistent. But I’ll make an exception here: If Zion was really identical to Jezzine or a settlement close to it, most of the oddities surrounding Zion would evaporate: The dew of Hermon would fall on Mount Zidon. David would have conquered Jezzine through its waterways and built his palace there, that’s why Solomon needed a new one for Jerusalem. 

Zion and Jerusalem 

All the “synonymous parallelism” verses listing Zion and Jerusalem could be explained as well: They would not be poetic parallels about one city, but about North and South of Israel. This would mean that Ancient Israel extended a bit further to the north than is usually thought. Would that be so terrible? 

But there remains the question why the elders of Jerusalem would flee to Mount Zidon. Was it perhaps really the elders of Zion, at Mount Zidon? I’m not yet ready to believe that Jerusalem was someplace else, but maybe it’s a partial censoring? Except for David’s conquest, there are no verses about Zion as a physical location. But maybe there were, in earlier versions. Maybe both cities were important, with some stories taking place at Jerusalem, and some at Zion. Perhaps later editors copied Jerusalem over all physical instances of Zion, just like they likely copied YHWH over divine names that were too close to theophoric names. This doesn’t invalidate the stories, but it would be serious censoring. Why would they do that? What is so terrible about Zion being found out to be Zidon Rabah? 

Obviously, the problem is that name and location of Zidon Rabah would put Ancient Israel very close to Ancient Zidon. And why would that be so terrible? Is it because the Zidonians were Baal worshipers? No: The same deities were worshiped in Tyre, portrayed in the Bible as a friendly neighbor to Israel. Zidonians and Tyrians are even often mentioned together, in the same verse. The difference is that “Zidonians” was a general term for “Phoenicians”. If Zion was Zidon, then one major city of Ancient Israel would be named “Phoenicia”! Even if this similarity was a coincidence, as soon as it was known to the public, the following “terrible” thing would happen: Whenever we detected scams of ultra-rich aristocratic merchants and financiers from the Levant, they could call themselves “Jews” all they want – but these “Jews” couldn’t hide any more behind their common-folk namesakes. No one would see humble Jews in these merchant princes. All their political correctness protective screens would fizzle out, and their rags-to-riches camouflage with it. We would look instead to Ancient Phoenicia, officially home region to ultra-rich aristocratic merchants and financiers. And we’d find official colonization trails from there, into all of Europe and beyond. I invite you all to see them for yourselves, in Part IV. 

The Punny Rule of Spook Law 

As a little preview to classical Roman times, I’ll offer one more explanation why the spooks would hide behind Judaism specifically. I have concentrated on the conveniently indexed Bible so far, but perhaps it is a mere sideshow. There’s the possibility is that the crypto-“Jewish” culture hijacking by the spooks is not centered around the Biblical narrative, but around special crypto-“Jewish” laws, which might really be written by and for spook aristocrats. 

Since we’ve never found any trace of serious, deadly infighting among the spooks, I think there is some institution that upholds the uneasy truce between these greedy, malevolent people. One clue is that all so-called “Free” Trade “Agreements” call for special  Investor-State Dispute Settlement panels, where wealthy lawyers can decide that ultra-rich investors are right, and any law representing common people is wrong. The Investor-State-Disputes are then settled by having money flow from the latter to the former. Why all the trouble for that? I think it’s because they’re secretly relying on such panels for intra-aristocratic disputes. Conflicts may arise if spook clan A wants to fleece a country’s budget through some scam, while spook clan B is running another scam against the same country. They both have their moles all over the government, so who’s to tell which clan ultimately owns the country? A settlement court with laws custom-tailored for ultra-rich spooks could help them to peacefully decide who gets our money, without anybody getting hurt! 

Jewish Law and “Jewish” Law 

What if special laws like these have always existed, and were disguised by powerful aristocratic spooks as “Jewish”, even though they are not helpful to ordinary Jews? I am not talking about the 7 Laws of Noah, or the 10 Commandments, or the 613 Mitzvot. I am talking about the immeasurably vast body of legal expertise, commentaries and case studies that is preserved in both regular Jewish and crypto-“Jewish”  Halakhic tradition. Only a tiny part of it is compiled in Mishnah, Tosefta and other written works, which are already running 1000s of pages. Yet even they are mostly commentary, on things that are themselves not defined in public texts. 

In a 2012 survey, 71% of Israelis stated that it’s “important” to study the Talmud,  but only 16% did so I think nobody can blame them. This immense yet cryptic body of laws  is often criticized, for being “confusing and unintelligible”. But perhaps unfairly. Perhaps it was, just like the Code of Hammurabi, primarily written for a very special target group: the super-rich and ultra-rich. 

As the vocabulary is not defined, and even the commentaries are very condensed, it is hard to discern what each paragraph is about. Some meanings might be hidden behind pun-words, but I think it’s mostly just coded language, like modern legalese, without any word similarities. 

Here’s one sample rule from  Nedarim (Vows), which includes the pun-word for date palms. I give a word-for-word translation, so you can appreciate the condensed style. 

[vow] [from] [dates] [permitted] [honey] [dates] [from late-grapes] [permitted] [vinegar] [lategrapes] [Rabbi Yehuda Ben Beteira] [says] [all] [where] [outcome] [named] [on him] [and vow] [his name] [forbidden] [output] [but sages] [allow]  NEDARIM 53A:1

הנודר מן התמרים מותר בדבש תמרים מסתוניות מותר בחומץ סתוניות רבי יהודה בן בתירא אומר כל ששם תולדתו קרויה עליו ונודר הימנו אסור ביוצא הימנו וחכמים מתירים 

You can see it’s compacted to the point where you can hardly guess what they meant. Here’s the official interpretation, in non-bold text, with only direct translations in bold: 

One who vows that dates are forbidden to him is permitted to eat date honey. One who vows that late grapes are forbidden to him is permitted to eat vinegar of late grapes. Rabbi Yehuda ben Beteira says: In the case of any food that the name of its derivative is called after its name, i.e., the liquid that emerges from it bears its name, e.g., date honey or vinegar of late grapes, and one vows that the item itself, e.g., the grape, is forbidden to him, he is also prohibited from consuming the liquid that emerges from it. But the Rabbis permit this. 

It’s a totally harmless abstinence law, and I think the opinions of both the Rabbi and the sages are acceptable. But we’d all agree that this rule is not overly useful or applicable, as very few people would vow to abstain from dates or late grapes specifically, and unless they produced the honey or vinegar themselves, they wouldn’t even know whether it came from dates or late grapes. They seem to be citing a precedent case, but I cannot imaging anyone settling something like this in a court. If it’s just a hypothetical case, I’d say they picked an unrealistic one. So the question is: Could the same law be very useful and applicable to ultra-rich folks, if interpreted differently? 

I chose this one as an example, because we know the aristocrats used the word tamar for dates and palms as a pun, referring instead to merchants and trade. 

Are the “late grapes”, sethav-nivot, also a pun? I have not found the second part nivot as grapes anywhere. Rather,  naveh and navot (נות (means “habitation” in the Bible, and it’s also the name of a housing project in Jerusalem. It could stand for housing. The first part sethav (סתו) indeed means autumn or winter. But the full word is in its 1st occurrence written M-STW-NYWT, like “from winter housing”, and if you interpret the same letters differently, it could even be MST-W-NYWT, “tribute and housing”, from  missat (מסת) meaning tributes. 

Either way, since tamarim as “trades” is a type of income, the grapes might be another type of income. I found no pun for honey or vinegar, but we could interpret the liquids as revenue flows. If we believe that the Nedarim are really about some kind of abstinence, and make a wild guess, the unofficial meaning could perhaps be something like this: 

If one party agreed to refrain from conducting trade, it is still permitted to receive trade profits. If it agreed to refrain from conducting housing business, it is still permitted to receive rental income. The attorney argued that if the revenue is booked in that party’s name, and the agreement to refrain was also made in that party’s name, this should be forbidden, but the judges allowed it. 

Say you wanted to arbitrate among ultra-rich clans who have carved up the entire planet among themselves and have a hard time refraining from trampling on each other’s turf. Such a law might then be useful to settle borderline cases, where one clan derives profit indirectly from another clan’s property. Of course, my Hebrew reading is poor, this is just a guess, and the Nedarim could really be about another sort of contract, or just about dates and honey. 

Phoenician Law 

But my grand theory was about the Phoenicians, right? How does this tie in with the Phoenicians? Phoenicia didn’t mint coins until very late. How did they store their vast riches? I think they invested it mostly in all the chunks of our planet. Tablets from Ancient Mesopotamia already contain detailed ownership certificates, exchange contracts and debt obligations. But to make this work, you need a court to enforce them. Since the main economic center in ancient times was the temple, this could’ve been done in the many temples the Phoenicians set up. 

A Punic sacrificial tariff was excavated from the harbor in Marseille. It likely stood in a temple, as the text begins with “Temple of the Lord” (בעל בת .(Overall, it’s relatively long for a Phoenician text that is suffered to exist. French Wikipedia has a  very short entry with a photo. A transcript is here.

First the two governors are listed: Hilles-Baal ben Bod-Tanit and Hilles-Baal ben Bod-Eshmun, not officially related, haha. After that, the tariff specifies payments and animal parts to be given to priests who carry out ritual slaughter of sacrificial animals for the owner. They are listed according to size: oxen, bullocks, stags, sheep, goats, lambs, goatlings, fawns, birds, oil, cakes, milk, fat. These are again sub-categorized for whole offering (כלל) ,thank offering (צועת) ,peace offering  .(שלם כלל)

You can find translations  here and here. Note that both scream “CHILD SACRIFICE!!!” immediately, to divert from the really important points, which I think are these: 

The tariff is similar to Jewish laws for sacrifice from the Book of Leviticus. This is  admitted in literature, and I see no problem with it. The two regions were neighbors, and it was simply a custom. 

More importantly: The list appears very detailed and bureaucratic. If the Phoenician rules for sacrifices were this fine-grained, we can imagine they had similar rules for anything and everything. 

MOST importantly: Line 17 and 18 specify that for highborn aristocrats, the public rules do not apply. Instead, there’s a non-public set of rules written down somewhere else: 

16. Anyone of high [birth], or any servant [thereof], or any [who arranges a] banquet for the gods, or any men which sacrifice [...?] 
17. these men shall pay for sacrifice [as per] other specifications set down in document [s ...?] 
18. Any payments which are not set down in this piece, are given according to the documents which [?... Hilles-Baal son of Bod-Tani] 
19. t and Hilles-Baal son of Abd-Eshmun and associates. 

kl mzrḥ wkl špḥ wkl mrzḥ ʾlm wkl ʾdmm ʾš yzbḥ [...?] hʾdmm hmt mšʾt ʿl zbḥ ʾḥd kmdt št bktb[t ...?] kl mšʾt ʾš ʾybl št bps z wntn lpy hktbt ʾš [?... ḥlṣbʿl bn bdtn] t wḥlṣbʿl bn bdʾšmn wḥbrnm 

כל מזרח וכל שפח וכל מרזח אלם וכל אדמם אש יזבח [...האדמם המת משאת על זבח אחד כמדת שת בכתב]ת [כל משאת אש איבל שת בפס ז ונתן לפי הכתבת אש ]...חלצבעל בן בדתנ ת וחלצבעל בן בדאשמן וחברנם 

It looks like the Hilles-Baal twins wrote a second set of rules for their peers, and didn’t want to publish it. Does that invoke a great deal of trust in ancient or modern elites? This sacrificial tariff is harmless, and I suppose they all did pay. But I personally suspect them of having a second set of laws for many things, up to the present day. 

Lawyers for Phoenician Emperors 

Miles has found that many rich and powerful people are related to influential “Rabbis”, like mother and father of Karl Marx. That wouldn’t be a problem if they were devout and pious, but they usually look more like corrupt spooks, who run grand-scale scams. Obviously, these “Rabbis” aren’t real Rabbis who’d teach about Judaism. I suspect them to be law experts instead, for spook law. We will likely find many more such “friendships” as we go back in history. I’ll give one example here. 

In Part IV, we will meet the  Severan dynasty of Roman emperors. They were officially Phoenician. Some came from Carthage, some from merchant cities along the Syrian trade route Byblos-Emesa-Palmyra. They had set up a cult around a god named “Lord Byblos” (El-Gebal), and one of their emperors was named “Lord Byblos” himself. Interestingly, the man who  compiled the Mishnah, officially the earliest written form of the immense body of laws we just discussed, was  friends with just this Phoenician dynasty which ruled Rome. 

His name was Judah I “the Prince”, explained with his Davidic bloodline, but probably really because he was president-prince of the Sanhedrin in 165–1220 AD, the rabbinical supreme court, which was for some reason  relocated to his hometown Usha between Haifa and Nazareth, with his father  Simeon ben Gamliel II becoming the first president there Neither that info nor the name of his father are linked from his Wiki page, though it says his  father started the Mishnah project. If you look at all the other  Judahs, Simeons and Gamliels in the presidents list, it would seem that these titles were either inheritable, or reserved for the most powerful clans, as today. 



To rehash, Judah I was president of the supreme court, but had edited and compiled the written laws himself. His father had also been president, and initiator of the laws project. The family was very wealthy and came from an area of industrial ports at the Phoenician coast, to which this supreme court was relocated, prior to them becoming presidents. Judah I was revered in Rome and was friends with a Phoenician emperor of Rome. 

What was this friendship about? The Talmud has many anecdotes about the two, definitely more mythical than historical. But let’s just see what the authors want to tell us. 


But MOST important is how Judah gave his advice: through vegetables!!! 

The Gemara relates: Antoninus had a certain daughter whose name was Gira, who performed a prohibited action, i.e., she engaged in promiscuous intercourse. Antoninus sent a rocket plant [gargira] to Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi, to allude to the fact that Gira had acted promiscuously [gar]. Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi sent him coriander [kusbarta], which Antoninus understood as a message to kill [kos] his daughter [barta], as she was liable to receive the death penalty for her actions. Antoninus sent him leeks [karti] to say: I will be cut off [karet] if I do so. Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi then sent him lettuce [ḥasa], i.e., Antoninus should have mercy [ḥas] on her .  AVODAH ZARAH 10B:2
הוה ליה ההוא ברתא דשמה גירא קעבדה איסורא שדר ליה גרגירא שדר ליה כוסברתא שדר ליה כרתי שלח ליה חסא 

“Coriander” means “kill your daughter”? I doubt that aristocrats ever killed their daughters. But do you notice something here? If not, have the modern commentary (non-bold) spell it out for you: 

The Gemara asks: But why not let him say his advice explicitly? Why did Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi answer in such a circumspect way, which could have been interpreted incorrectly? The Gemara answers: Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi said to himself: If I answer openly, the important Romans might hear me and will cause me anguish. The Gemara asks: But why not let him say his advice quietly? The Gemara explains: Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi was still worried that they might hear what he had said, because it is written: “Curse not the king, no, not in your thought, and curse not the rich in your bedchamber, for a bird of the air shall carry the voice” (Ecclesiastes 10:2) . AVODAH ZARAH 10B:1
ולימא ליה מימר ]בהדיא [ אמר שמעי )בי( חשובי רומי ומצערו ליה ולימא ליה בלחש משום דכתיב )קהלת י, כ( כי עוף השמים יוליך את הקול 

Okay, here you have it: The Talmud advises to follow the man who compiled the Mishnah because he always used puns to disguise important topics, so that other people wouldn’t know what a conversation is about! If I haven’t convinced you yet that Ancient Spookian culture was all about puns, including their laws, I hope you can now consider this possibility! 

And you probably noticed that only the bold text is translated from Hebrew, the rest is Steinsaltz commentary. Without it, that passage would have slipped by me. No wonder all the other spook “Rabbis” ” hate Steinsaltz for it and ban his books.Thank you, Steinsaltz, chummy old spook! 

And as for you, all you sorry little spook “lawyers” and spooklings out there: Instead of ganging up on your colleague, you should hang your heads in shame, because the mess we’re all in is also your collective fault! People like me aren’t becoming truthers because someone spills a bean or two in a translation. But because we’re forced to live in a world of rampant top-level corruption and fake terror gone through the roof! In all these millennia of spook law refinement, you couldn’t figure out a way to grant us commoners a minimum of peace and stability? To put a limit to the madness wrought by the top families? Either you failed to uphold the law that should protect us all, or you failed to even write it in the first place! I suggest you start doing your job and work with us to fix this mess, or your cozy ways of blissful punnery will soon become a thing of the ancient past. 

But enough ranting. Dear readers, let’s wrap it up, close the old books, and breathe some fresh air. We’re done here, for now. 

Conclusion 
Okay, that was it. This part of my analysis of ancient spookery, linking Ancient Israel and Ancient Phoenicia, was the most difficult, both emotionally and because of all those glyphs. I hope it has not offended or overly bored you, that you still believe in whatever you believed before, and that you got some new insights out of it nonetheless. 

While it’s a downer to see that aristocratic scamming goes back to ancient times, I find it at the same time consoling that we common people have survived practically all of history with these idiots around, and still made a lot of headway. I admit it’s a giant handicap having to drag the aristocratic dead-weight along, but at least we can safely ditch all those end-of-world scares. We kept our world spinning, and we will keep it spinning. Miles has always said as much. 

So, just try to take it easy. And if you think you’re ready for some more truthing around, I’ll invite you all to join me again for Part IV, where the “Phoenician angle” will serve us much of classical antiquity on a silver plate, including the heads of some head spooks. I promise there will me no more difficult Bible analysis, just a good old Wikipedia walkthrough, Miles-style. 

Thanks a lot for joining me, and hope to see you again! 

[Miles here: I said I would save most of my comments for the end of Part IV, and that still holds. I want to let Gerry have his say. However, some of what he says here can be misread, and will be misread, I think, so I will tell you my reading before we go any further. Some will think Gerry is trying to say the Jews are really Phoenicians, to deflect blame or otherwise misdirect. I don't think that is what he is doing, or saying. In my mind, you could just as easily say the Phoenicians were really Jews, and that might be a better way of putting it in our context. What he has shown is evidence the Israelites and Phoenicians were two arms of the same beast, with the Phoenician arm later suppressed because it was known to be a rich arm. The modern Jews prefer to sell themselves as victims and underdogs, as Gerry says. We see that every time I do the genealogy of a Hollywood star, where they want you to believe they are the sons and daughters of truck drivers and waitresses, instead of the children of the elite that they are. So it isn't that the Jews aren't really Jews or Zionists or Israelites or Hebrews. They are. But they are also Phoenicians, Egyptians, Canaanites, Assyrians, and Sumerians. What we now call the Jews were behind all those civilizations, comprising the elite class hiding in the dark beneath them all. . . just like now. Modern elite Jews are cosmopolitans, being American, Canadian, French, English, Dutch, Russian, Polish, and every other designation. In exactly the same way, the ancient Jews were everywhere there was money to be made and things to be traded. After a certain point, which even Gerry can't specify, we may assume they were deeply lodged in all the famous old civilizations, running all or most of them from behind the scenes. Israel and Phoenicia stand out in this list, the former for obvious reasons and the latter for the reasons Gerry has laid out for you. Phoenicia was so obviously Jewish its records had to be permanently hidden. And Solomon's links to Phoenicia were so obvious they had to likewise hidden or tweaked. 

But Gerry's greater point here is that the Phoenicians are a better tag for the modern Jews in some ways since the Phoenicians were admitted to be rich traders, with their paws in all civilizations in Europe and the Near East going back to 2500 BC and before. Also because the admitted history of the Phoenicians helps us understand the current Jews. As when Herodotus tells us the Persian historians claimed the “Phoenicians began the quarrel”. Substitute Jews there and you have it. Also because it helps us understand the East India Company, a later Jewish construct. By realizing Jew=Phoenician, we can understand that the East India Company didn't begin in 1600. It has existed in unbroken line back to 2500 BC and before, just changing names and expanding routes. The important characteristics of the Jews as I have been uncovering them is not the funny hats, sidecurls, and beards, it is the international trade, hidden power structures, hidden relationships, and worldwide propaganda machine. For this reason, linking them to the Phoenicians is useful in understanding who they really are, what is important to them, and how they see themselves. Although Gerry may overstress some things and under stress others for my taste here, I think he has put a lot good data on the table. Some may stand and some may fall, but I thought it was worth putting in front of you. Even if you or I decide his answer is not right, what we learned here may help us see a better answer. 

next
Spookdom’s trail into history

source

No comments:

Part 1 Windswept House A VATICAN NOVEL....History as Prologue: End Signs

Windswept House A VATICAN NOVEL  by Malachi Martin History as Prologue: End Signs  1957   DIPLOMATS schooled in harsh times and in the tough...