Part 4: Eyes Wide Open..Bond University Pedophile Network...The Greater Good...Conspiracy Fact

Eyes Wide Open

By Fiona Barnett

5

Bond University Pedophile Network

BOND UNIVERSITY EXPOSED

Fiona Barnett, Independent Australia, 20 July 2014

Bond  Uni  has  been  in  the  news  recently  with criminologist  lecturer  Professor  Paul Wilson facing court on child abuse charges. Former student Fiona Barnett says the rot at the University goes deep.

Bond University was founded by Australia’s most notorious corporate criminal, Alan Bond. As disgruntled students have discovered, Alan Bond structured the private organisation so it evades public accountability — despite the fact the university accesses public funds in the form of student loans. Bond University’s lack of public accountability stems in part from the fact that it is not actually a university but rather a corporation legally permitted to borrow the title ‘university.’

I undertook postgraduate psychology studies at Bond University from 2006 to 2007, and again from 2009 to 2010. In 2013, I reported Bond University to the Royal Commission into  Institutional  Responses  to Child  Sexual  Abuse.  My  complaint  contained  a long  list  of offences in relation to the cover-up of pedophile activities, pro-paedophilia course content,the misuse of students’ personal child abuse histories, and the sexual harassment and assault of students by certain lecturers.

High-profile psychologist damns Bond University

I provided the Royal Commission with the transcript of legally obtained recordings of Bob Montgomery, previous president of the APS (Australian Psychological Society) and former Head of Psychology at Bond University. Dr Montgomery described Bond as follows:

It is one of the worst run universities I’ve ever seen. It’s dishonest. It’s been dishonest all the time I’ve known it... Bond University will do all the skullduggerous things they can  to  deny  any  mis-practice...  While  I  was  there,  they  had  a lunatic professor  of psychology.    He was caught screwing his secretary on the desk. The outcome was he sacked the secretary and the vice-chancellor backed him up.    So, you might have a realistic concern if you enrol for an externship that they may try to manipulate the situation in some way to try and put you in a bad light. And you’ve got to put that in your decision-making mix. If you decide to plough ahead with Bond University. you will be dealing with people who are out to get you, nasty, willing to do dishonest things, and getting increasingly desperate because not only have they not knocked you down, but you’re coming back even stronger.

Bond University covers-up child sexual abuse

While working in the Bond University Psychology Clinic, a 10-year-old DOCS client and her foster mother disclosed to me that a former foster carer and convicted pedophile had sexually assaulted my client, along with other children. In direct contravention of Queensland legislation regarding  the  concealment  of  child  abuse,  Bond University  forbade  me  from reporting  these crimes  to  the  police.  I  persuaded  one  lecturer to  let  me  inform  the Queensland   Children's Commissioner   of   the  allegations. Bond University, however, subsequently withdrew my complaint to the Commissioner without my knowledge and then lied to  the  Commissioner  by  saying  they  had  done so  in  consultation  with  me.  While the Commissioner upheld my complaint and proceeded with an investigation, Bond University chastised me and said my complaint jeopardised their relationship with the DOCS office, upon which they relied for clients to keep the Bond Psychology Clinic running.

Bond University’s pro-paedophilia teachings

In 2013, I asked the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Abuse to investigate Bond University  with  respect  to its  pro-paedophilia  teachings.  These  teachings include the writings of a psychology and criminology lecturer, and Order of Australia medal recipient, Professor Paul Wilson, who served as Dean of Humanities at Bond University for 10 years. In one of his books, subtitled Sexual Experiences between Men and Boys, the professor promoted the benefits of paedophilia and renaming this crime ‘Greek love.’ The professor also  published  articles  on  Bond University’s  website,  which  stated  that  children are  often willing participants in child sexual abuse.(The Royal Commission gasped when I read that fact out.)

In late 2012, Paul Wilson was charged with six counts of indecent dealings with two girls — one of whom was under 12 years old. In May 2014, he was committed to stand trial. The same professor taught me at Bond University. He and other Bond lecturers, in my view, encouraged  a  strong  anti-victim/pro-perpetrator  stance  in  their  classes. For example,  one lecturer  endorsed  the  notion  that technically  there  is  no  such  thing  as  a  victim of crime because a criminal case involves the defendant versus the crown instead of the defendant versus a victim. On another occasion, I had marks deducted for briefly mentioning a victim’s perspective in an essay.

Bond  University  lecturers  strongly  endorsed  the flawed  ‘false  memory  syndrome' writings  of  USA psychologist  Elizabeth  Loftus.  The  Royal Commission  commended  my submission against Loftus’ writings and my condemnation of her association with the False Memory Syndrome Foundation (FMSF). The FMSF was founded by Peter Freyd and his wife (and stepsister) Pamela after their daughter, Professor Jennifer Freyd, accused Peter of child sexual abuse. Apart from founding the FMSF, Peter has publicly endorsed paedophilia as a responsible lifestyle choice and allowing siblings to marry. The effect of the FMSF has been to discredit child abuse witness testimony and the existence of well organised pedophile rings.

Bond University sexually harasses students

Bond  University  has  a  history  of  sexually harassing  students.  During  my  2009-10 enrolment, the following incidents occurred: a postgraduate student handed out pamphlets on campus  alleging  that  a  senior  staff  member  had sexually  harassed  him  and  that  the university had engaged in cult-like practises; a female lecturer offered a teenage girl who was on scholarship, sex in exchange for good grades; and a male lecturer offered a legal minor, also on scholarship, sex in exchange for good grades. The girl’s father, a lawyer, threatened to lodge a complaint with the AHRC (Australian Human Rights Commission). In an effort to placate  the  family,  Bond  University  offered the  girl  a  transfer  to  her  preferred  Sydney University. I witnessed a Bond University lecturer regularly throw parties at her house, during which students were supplied copious amounts of alcohol. I also saw the lecturer instigate a game of ‘sexual disclosure’ spin-the-bottle with her students.

Bond University pressures students to disclose child abuse histories.

Bond University psychology staff exhibited a pattern of obtaining students’ personal information, which they would then use to hold students to ransom if they complained about their Bond experience. I witnessed lecturers’ concerted efforts to bait a fellow student into disclosing her child abuse history to them. ‘She came so close to disclosing!’ one lecturer told me on one occasion, in a state of high excitement.

I  was  pressured  to  disclose  my  personal  history of  child  sexual  abuse  to  Bond University lecturers during psychological supervision and while socialising with lecturers in their homes and also at my home. According to my understanding, the lecturers’ abuse of their authority, and their pressuring of me to disclose personal information, constituted a breach of the APS Code of Ethics and Guidelines.

During  my  studies,  I  was  sexually  harassed  by a Bond  University  staff  member  My experience of sexual harassment occurred in response to the disclosure of my child sexual abuse. The same lecturer tricked me into sleeping in her bed at a student party, described my breasts as ‘magnificent,’ before grabbing one and massaging it in a sexual manner.

Formal Complaints against Bond University

I rejected a Bond University lecturer’s unwanted sexual advances and complained to Bond University and to the Psychology Board. I also lodged a complaint of  sexual harassment and disability discrimination with the Australian Human Rights Commission, which upheld my entire complaint.

The disability discrimination section of my complaint related to a visual cortex stroke I  suffered  during the  fifth  week  of  my  masters  program. Lecturers  used  my  subsequent disability as a means of harassing me. Staff refused to adhere to the conditions set out by my Bond University disability support officer — consequently, I suffered further damage to my vision.

Bond staff subjected me to extreme bullying and harassment, including exclusion and placing me under excessive scrutiny. For example, a staff member verbally abused a student peer  and reduced  her  to  tears  for  inviting  me  to  her private  engagement  party.  This victimisation intensified following my initial complaint to the Psychology Board and following my attempts to adhere to mandatory reporting legislation in relation to child abuse disclosure in the university’s psychology clinic.

Bond University’s Corruption

In October 2010, to subdue an adversary process I had in place against staff at the time, Bond University staff lodged a vexatious and unsubstantiated notification against me to the  Psychology  Board, which  is  administered  by  AHPRA (Australian  Health  Practitioner Regulation Agency). Bond University staff simultaneously pooled the information they had gleaned about my own childhood sexual abuse. They removed the age I was during the time of my child abuse and reported me as an adult perpetrator instead of a child victim of the same crimes to AHPRA and to the NSW police. An (11/11/2010) email from AHPRA to a senior Queensland police detective who lectures at Bond University stated:

It has come to my attention that Ms Barnett is under investigation by police following serious allegations of a criminal nature… if you have any information which may be imperative to the assessment of Ms Barnett’s health, please do not hesitate to contact me.

The  police  officer  then  (26/11/2010)  sent  the following  email  to  AHPRA  from  his Bond University email account:

The last briefing I had was that contact had been made with NSWPOL and they could not identify any outstanding jobs that would match the claims made. They also informed us that the suspect had previously made outlandish claims of a similar nature. The investigation is ongoing but given the above I would suspect it will not be a police matter.

A second (27/11/10) email from police to AHPRA said:

At this stage we are unable to find any evidence to what MS BARNETT is saying. MS BARNETT has previously made similar admissions to NSW police in 2008, this investigation was finalised as no evidence could be located to substantiate what MS BARNETT has stated.

AHPRA used the above correspondence as evidence I was a criminal, as detailed in their 29 March 2011 letter to me:

…confirmation of similar reported events by the NSW Police Service regarding past criminal activities of a serious nature is a matter that the Board will need to address.

I  sent  written  complaints  about  these  emails  to the  NSW  and  Queensland  police ministers.  Both ministers  denied  that  NSW  police  provided any  information  to  AHPRA  in support of Bond University’s accusation that I was a perpetrator of crimes. So, either police lied to their ministers about providing emails to AHPRA, or AHPRA fabricated evidence against me.

Bond University staff lied to AHPRA by alleging that I had suddenly became psychotic at an unspecified time, somewhere between the second and third field placements I did as part of my masters program. They simultaneously treated my child abuse history as both: (a) real (i.e., evidence of my alleged criminality), and (b) fictitious (i.e., the product of my alleged sudden psychosis).

Bond University accused me of 'decompensating into psychosis' — despite me having no history or symptoms of psychosis whatsoever. They made this claim without consulting the only Bond employees who had regular contact with me during the time that this ‘mental illness’ was supposedly manifesting — my two external supervisors.

Dr Gavan Palk (barrister and chair of the APS Forensic College) supervised my second practicum, during which he saw me four hours per week for three months. Dr Norm Barling, who was Bond University’s Clinical Director for 20 years, supervised my third practicum. Both supervisors wrote me glowing references that made a mockery of Bond’s notification. For instance, Dr Palk wrote:

Ms Barnett impressed as an extremely intelligent person with excellent written and oral skills. She has exceptional writing skills and her psychological reports were very thorough  and  well  written.  She demonstrated  that  she  could  integrate  her clinical experience of clients with objective test results. Her opinions were sound and followed logically from the evidence she gathered through testing and interviews.

In regards to interactions with clients, Ms Barnett demonstrated that she was able to develop and maintain a therapeutic alliance with clients. She also demonstrated a solid command  of  micro counselling  skills  and  sensitivity  to  client’s needs. Her  approach towards clients was very professional and she had no difficulty in analysing problems,undertaking  appropriate research  background  forming  hypotheses, planning  and carrying out psychological interventions...

In  conclusion,  it  was  a  pleasure  to  provide supervision  to  Ms  Barnett.  She  is  a passionate and intelligent person who has persevered in spite of her health difficulties.The writer is very confident that Fiona has the makings of a very fine psychologist and she should be encouraged to undertake a PhD in the area of sensory processing and intellectual giftedness.

All of Bond University’s vague accusations were easily and completely disproved by written evidence, including emails, and letters from witnesses and health professionals that I submitted to AHPRA. Most telling, Bond University had already passed me, over one year prior  to  the  false  and  vexatious notification  in  the  very  subjects  during  which the alleged ethical breaches were said to have occurred. Further, Dr Barling pointed out that if Bond staff had any concerns about my mental health prior to my commencing the third practicum, then ethically  and legally  they  were  not  permitted  to  allow  me to  commence  a  third  work placement — which, of course, they had done.

Bond University submitted to AHPRA and the AHRC a written confession that a Bond lecturer  had students attend  a  sleepover  at  her  house  in  2007  an  act which,  alone, constituted an alleged breach of the APS Ethical Code and Guidelines. In this same document, the lecturer lied by alleging I was not enrolled in Bond University at the time  of her 2007 party, when academic transcripts clearly show I was, indeed, enrolled.

Despite my excellent academic history – including a grade of 89% in my final theory subject, Psychopharmacology – and with only two subjects to complete before obtaining my Master of Psychology degree. Bond University wrote 'withdrawn' on my academic transcript. They then failed to grant me a right of reply to their action and forbade me from accessing their  appeals  system.  As  a consequence,  I  was  robbed  of  six  years  of study and  close  to $100,000 I paid in student loans. And since I was no longer enrolled in a psychology course, AHPRA immediately cancelled my student psychology registration.

Bond University’s double standards

In  2013,  Bond  University  staff  allegedly  severely breached  privacy  legislation  and ethical  standards in  the  execution  of  a  research  project  into autism  (Project  Number  RO-1516).  The  project’s approved  recruitment  protocol  was  for  parents to  be  invited  to participate in the study via emails sent from Gold Coast Autism Inc. Instead, the Queensland Education Department provided Bond University with the names, medical history and contact details of state school students who are registered with the department as having autism without the parents’ knowledge or consent. One parent told me, Bond University contacted her on a Saturday via her private mobile. When the mother confronted her school principal, he said he knew nothing about the research project. If true, this ethical breach is monumental and far surpasses the petty ethical breaches that they falsely accused me of committing.

For instance, Bond reported me to AHPRA for 'upsetting a student' by appropriately borrowing a psychology test from the library. Unbeknownst to me, the student (whom I had never met) wanted the test I had borrowed. The student, who had a history of aggressive behaviour  and  who  had  allegedly attracted  formal  student  complaints,  stormed  in on  my client session in the Psychology Clinic and demanded I immediately cease working with my client and give him the test. Despite the fact my supervisor informed me, via email, that he reported the  student  to  the  Psychology  Board,  one  year  later  Bond  staff  reported  me  to AHPRA for the very same incident.

Bond University audited

Because  of  Bond  University’s  private  status,  they proved  unaccountable  to  every government body to which a similarly offended student at a public university might be able to appeal. Bond is supposedly answerable to the Australian Psychology Accreditation Council (APAC),   the national   body   that   accredits  psychology courses.   In March   2011,   APAC commenced an audit of Bond University in response to alleged multiple breaches of APAC Standards.  Bond  had previously  lost accreditation  for  similar breaches  in  2007/2008. In response to this audit, Bond employed yet another organisational psychologist to conduct student interviews.However, aggrieved   students   were actively   denied  access to   this investigation.

APAC intervened and virtually begged a fellow offended student and me to attend the interviews. APAC  assured  us  that  multiple  students  had supported  and  validated  our complaints against Bond. In the end, APAC and the APS did nothing to assist me in my fight for justice and vindication. In a letter to the AHRC, Bond University documented and criticised my attendance at the APAC interviews. In this letter, they stated that APAC did not take my testimony seriously. Immediately  following  the APAC  audit, two Bond  Psychology Clinic administrators lodged internal complaints against one offending psychology lecturer for her misconduct and her mistreatment of me and other psychology students. Bond University then pressured that lecturer to resign.

The main offending lecturers remain employed at Bond University.

*           *           *

AHPRA PROTECTS ALLEGED SEX OFFENDERS

Fiona Barnett, Independent Australia, 3 November 2014.

After Fiona Barnett was bullied out of her Bond University psychology course, health regulator AHPRA  treated  her  case  with  a  curious  mixture of  incredible incompetence  and callous contempt.

In theory, the role of the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) is to oversee the administration of our medical, psychology and other health profession boards. They are supposed to protect the public from malpractice, while simultaneously offering a level of protection for innocent health professionals against vexatious and unsubstantiated complaints.

In 2011, a Senate Committee Inquiry was conducted into AHPRA. The Inquiry’s findings were damning. The resultant report stated:

6.19 In relation to complaints about health practitioners, the committee identified a number  of areas  where  improvements  are  required including  inconsistencies  in application of complaint processes … and the way in which vexatious complaints are handled.

6.32 … the mistakes, omissions and poor processes that were clearly evident from the evidence received during the inquiry calls into question the ability of AHPRA to carry out its primary purpose. For AHPRA itself to be responsible for a breakdown of the entire system of registration of health practitioners in Australia is a dismal example of policy implementation and public administration.

The  Senate  Inquiry  identified  the  Queensland AHPRA  office  as  Australia’s  most incompetent state office. You might expect, following such a finding, that the Queensland AHPRA office may have addressed the Inquiry’s criticisms and implemented some changes. Unfortunately, if you did, you would be wrong.

AHPRA exploits student's child abuse history

My   personal   child   abuse   experiences   formed the   basis   for   Bond University’s notification against  me.  My  abuse  constituted  grounds  for Bond’s  allegation  that  I  was ‘impaired’  and posed a  risk  to  the  public.  This  was  despite no  explained  link  between  my having experienced child abuse 30+ years ago and my alleged impairment. AHPRA cited my personal  child  abuse history  as  evidence  that  I  was  psychotic  and a  criminal.  The  obvious anomaly in their argument was that they used my personal testimony as being a symptom of psychosis,  then they  simultaneously employed  my  testimony as  a  basis  for contacting the police and accusing me of criminal activity. It is difficult to understand how my testimony could simultaneously be both a product of my imagination and a physical reality.

After  making  a  FOI  (Freedom  of  Information) application,  I  obtained  the  following emails showing that AHPRA communicated with police in both NSW and Queensland. Two email exchanges identified a senior detective who worked for the Gold Coast CIB and who also  lectured  at  Bond University.  The  first  email  (dated 11/11/2010)  from  AHPRA  to  the Queensland police officer was addressed to his Bond University email:

‘It has come to my attention that Ms Barnett is under investigation by police following serious allegations of a criminal nature …  if you have any information which may be imperative to the assessment of Ms Barnett’s health, please do not hesitate to contact me.’

The second email (dated 26/11/10) from the Bond University lecturer to AHPRA stated:

The last briefing I had was that contact had been made with NSWPOL and they could not identify any outstanding jobs that would match the claims made. They also informed us that the suspect had previously made outlandish claims of a similar nature.     The investigation is ongoing but given the above I would suspect it  will not be a police matter.

This letter documents that police dismissed my testimony as ‘outlandish,’ despite:

- Possessing Tor Nielsen’s collaborative witness testimony prior to my contacting them.

- Never having collected a comprehensive statement from me.

- Having assigned a task force to investigate a pedophile ring at the institution where I had been abused (Engadine BoysTown).

Another email (dated 27/11/10) from police to AHPRA stated:

At this stage we are unable to find any evidence to what MS BARNETT is saying. MS BARNETT has previously made similar admissions to NSW police in 2008, this investigation was finalised as no evidence could be located to substantiate what MS BARNETT has stated.

I was never interviewed with regard to the allegations I made to police. AHPRA used the above correspondence as evidence I was a criminal, as recorded in their letter (dated 29/3/11) and addressed to me, which said:

…confirmation of similar reported events by the NSW Police Service regarding past criminal activities of a serious nature is a matter that the Board will need to address.

I  sent  written  complaints  about  these  emails  to the  NSW  and  Queensland police commissioners. 

Both police commissioners denied that NSW police provided any information to AHPRA in support of Bond University’s accusation that I was a perpetrator of crimes. 

So, either police lied to their ministers about providing emails to AHPRA or AHPRA fabricated evidence   against   me.   

I   submitted   the   two police   ministers’   response letters, plus comprehensive evidence which clearly disproved Bond University’s allegations against me. I submitted these to Queensland AHPRA’s state manager.

AHPRA use health assessment to ‘stitch up’ student

On the basis of Bond University’s vexatious and unsubstantiated notification, AHPRA ordered me to attend a health assessment. Several professional sources warned me not to attend this assessment. These sources included a high-profile psychiatrist who warned me that  AHPRA  had  employed  a notorious  ‘creep’  psychiatrist  to  ‘stitch  [me]  up.’ Patient feedback on a social media site described the ‘hired gun’ as ‘likes to humiliate patients.’ My own  GP also warned me not to attend AHPRA’s health assessment.

One close personal contact, who drafts legislation for the Queensland Government, warned me that archaic Queensland legislation permitted AHPRA’s ‘hired gun’ health assessor to decide I was psychotic even if I was not, call police without my family’s knowledge, drug me and admit me to a psychiatric hospital. She said AHPRA had far reaching powers, including the authority to enter my home and remove my personal belongings. She studied the new Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (Qld) 2009 (referred to hereafter as the Health Act) and concluded that it had been poorly written, failing to include penalties for my refusing to attend an AHPRA health assessment. She then advised me not to attend the assessment.

The  multiple  warnings  not  to  attend  AHPRA’s health  assessment  seemed  valid considering:

- What happened to Tor Nielsen when he attended a similar assessment in Sydney.

- The damning findings of the 2011 Senate Committee Inquiry into AHPRA.

- AHPRA’s multiple breaches of legislation in their administration of Bond University’s vexatious notification against me.

AHPRA Breach Health Act 2009

AHPRA breached the Health Act by, for example, demanding I pay the costs associated with their health assessment. They sent me multiple ‘Authority’ forms to sign, which said:

I, Fiona Barnett hereby authorise the following practitioner to provide information as requested by the Psychology Board regarding my current and past medical condition. I agree to accept responsibility for any costs associated with the production of this information.

Notably,  AHPRA  omitted  their  ‘Authority’  form from  my  released  FOI  file.  This direction from AHPRA overrode a general provision made in Section 171(4) of the Health Act which  states:  ‘The assessor’s  fee  for  carrying  out  the  assessment  is  to  be  paid  out  of  the National Board’s budget.’

AHPRA violates APS Code of Ethics

On  29  November  2010,  a  fellow  Bond  University student  and  I  submitted  a  joint notification to AHPRA against several Bond University lecturers. The other student had an unblemished 10-year career as a psychologist and a supervisor. AHPRA refused to action our joint notification. The health regulator stated its reasons for refusing to act were: the other student  and  I  were  not  classified  as clients in  receipt  of  psychological  services;  and since AHPRA was less than a year old, it had not had time to adopt the APS Code of Ethics and Guidelines. AHPRA’s   failure   to   recognise   Bond  psychology students   as   recipients   of psychological services seems to breach section 5 of the Act, which clearly classifies health education as a health service of which psychology students are recipients. Back in 2009, the Psychologists Board of Queensland had already sent me a letter saying:

…the Board endorses the Australian Psychological Society’s APS Code of Ethics and the APS Ethical Guidelines. The Board is guided by, though not limited to, these documents when assessing the professional conduct of registrants.

The  letter  shows  that  the  definition  of  students as  clients  preceded  AHPRA.  This definition should have been implemented regardless of whether the administration of the Psychology Board had problems transitioning from a state to a national scheme. In any case, AHPRA’s failure to apply the APS Code of Ethics breaches s40 of the Health Act, which deems AHPRA to have adopted the APS Code of Ethics when it first appeared on the AHPRA website in 2010.

Meanwhile, AHPRA stated they had employed the very same APS Ethical Code and Guidelines  in  their administration  of  Bond’s  vexatious and  unsubstantiated  notification against me. On 29/3/11, they wrote:

The Board has adopted the Australian Psychological Society’s Code of Ethics for the profession and should an investigation be commenced into the conduct and professional standards of Ms Barnett, the Code will be the standard against which the concerns will be assessed.

Since  Bond  University’s  notification  arrived  prior to  my  joint  student notification against Bond, this order of events makes a mockery of AHPRA’s argument — that they were too  new  and disorganised  to  apply  the  APS  Code  of  Ethics  to a  joint  student  notification against Bond University.

AHPRA condones unprofessional conduct

Bond University psychology lecturers should be held accountable according to the APS Code of Ethics and Guidelines regardless of whether psychology students are labelled ‘clients’ or ‘colleagues.’

AHPRA’s lack of action against Bond University psychology lecturers would appear to be inconsistent with the Health Act’s definition of ‘unprofessional conduct’, which is stated to mean: ‘… professional conduct that is of a lesser standard than that which might reasonably be expected of the health practitioner by the public or the practitioner's professional peers.’

It is difficult to imagine that the public would approve of psychologists and lecturers having parties with students, supplying students with alcohol, and then sexually assaulting students while they are under its influence of alcohol and asleep. It is also difficult to imagine that professional peers would condone Bond University’s lack of adherence to mandatory reporting requirements.

AHPRA deny due process and natural justice

In  a  letter  (dated  4/1/11)  AHPRA  admitted  that it  operates  in  accordance  with principles of natural justice. Natural justice dictates that an individual (where allegations are to be made against that individual) is entitled to know precisely what those allegations are and the facts upon which it is said those allegations arise. However, AHPRA failed to tell me the basis for the allegations of unsatisfactory conduct and professional standards, criminal behaviour, being impaired and of posing a risk to the public. Consequently, AHPRA failed to act in accordance with the principles of natural justice.

AHPRA deprived me of my right to due process and my right to be heard. I was denied correct information and legal consultation. AHPRA denied me the opportunity to respond to Bond University’s allegation I was ‘psychotic’ and a ‘criminal.’ They consistently denied me the chance to submit an initial right of reply to Bond’s notification. Despite multiple requests, AHPRA  failed  to  provide me  with  sufficient  information  concerning the  content  of  Bond’s notification  against  me  so that  I  could  actually  compose  a  right  of  reply. To  access  any information, I had to struggle to obtain my AHPRA file under FOI provisions.

AHPRA directed me to attend substance abuse testing (including urinalysis) when I have no history of substance abuse and when no reference to an alleged substance abuse problem  was  made  in  the Bond  University  notification.  Nor  were  there  any reference  to substance abuse in any of the 200 pages of my AHPRA file released via FOI.

AHPRA  tried  to  bully,  threaten  and  railroad  me into  quickly  complying with  their unlawful  and unfair  administration  of  a  vexatious  notification. AHPRA  demonstrated  bias, provided me with confusing and contradictory instructions, withheld crucial information and misrepresented   me   to  the Queensland  Psychology   Board.   AHPRA   set me impossible deadlines, carrying negative consequences and threatened me with action that could result in financial loss, loss of professional registration, loss of reputation and deprivation of liberty.

AHPRA reneges on agreement

AHPRA  eventually  said  that  I  could  substitute their  psychiatric  assessment  with  a private medical report. My GP referred me to a high-profile psychiatrist for a specialist report. I  paid  thousands of  dollars  for  a  comprehensive  medical  report, in  which  the  psychiatrist concluded that I had no mental health disorder. He reported that the only thing I needed counselling for was the mistreatment and subsequent stress to which Bond University had subjected me. AHPRA rejected the privately acquired medical report.

AHPRA then mysteriously gave me back my registration. Then they took it away again.This yo-yo approach was typical of Queensland AHPRA.

Several staff displayed a sarcastic and abusive phone manner. Written communication suggested  that certain  AHPRA  staff  enjoyed  overstepping professional  boundaries  at  my expense.

Complaint Tampering by Federal Agency

AHPRA’s    administration    is    answerable    to   the National    Health   Practitioner Ombudsman. I submitted a complaint against AHPRA, plus a request for an administrative review, to the National Ombudsman. I sent my comprehensive complaint and evidence via registered post. Despite my receiving a signed delivery confirmation slip, the ombudsman’s administrator told me that their office never received my complaint. The office ignored my follow-up emails, emailed complaint submission, phone calls and recorded messages. I then formally complained about my missing parcel to Australia Post, who concluded that it ‘must have been lost.’

Conclusion

Queensland AHPRA’s actions against me  an innocent student and victim of crime indicate that nothing has changed to improve their professional operation since the damning findings of the 2011 Senate Committee Inquiry. As other Independent Australia contributors have long campaigned for, a Royal Commission is required to get to the bottom of the shonky perhaps criminal – administration of health in Australia.

*           *           *

A Second Bond Psychology Lecturer Charged with Pedophilia

Two Bond University Psychology professors were charged with historical pedophilia crimes after Bond’s Psychology faculty destroyed my Psychology career PAUL WILSON AND Bob Montgomery.  Bob Montgomery  established  the  Bond  Psychology program  while  Paul Wilson   was   the   Head   of the   Humanities  Department.   The   two   accused pedophile psychologists worked at Bond at the same time.

Paul  Wilson  was  prominent  in  Australia’s  1980s academic  movement  to  legalise pedophilia.  While lecturing  at  the  University  of  Queensland, Wilson  organised  a  pro- pedophilia  conference which  the  university  cancelled  following public  outcry,  and  he ‘accidentally’  showed  a psychology  class  the  end  of  a  child  porn  snuff film.  One  student witness  was  the  daughter  of  a Queensland  police  commissioner.  Other  students are  now practising psychologists. Paul Wilson was friends with Queensland Police Commissioner Terry Lewis who kept a dirt file on him which surfaced during the Kimmin’s Report and found its way into the Fitzgerald Inquiry of the late 1980s. The Fitzgerald Inquiry was Queensland’s version  of  the NSW  Wood  Royal  Commission  into  government child  sex  trafficking,  and similarly buried its crucial findings.

In 1981, Paul Wilson wrote a book subtitled, The Man They Called a Monster: Sexual Experiences Between Men and Boys 93  which advocated for pedophilia to be renamed ‘Greek love’ and be socially accepted like in Ancient Greece. The book defended Wilson’s pedophile associate  Clarence  Henry  Osborne,  who maintained  records  of  his  2,500  victims  plus VIP pedophiles including academics like Paul Wilson.

In 2016, Paul Wilson was sentenced to 6 months prison for the historical sexual assault of two young girls. A journalist, to whom I provided information for a Courier Mail feature story about the case, told me Paul Wilson had such a long list of victims  waiting to prosecute him, he will spend the rest of his days either in court or prison.

Bob Montgomery
In 2019, Bob Montgomery was charged with sexually abusing and anally raping three young  boys  in  the 1970s.  Montgomery  established  psychology courses  at  two  other universities besides Bond, including Alfred Conlon’s ANU in Canberra. Montgomery authored 13  books, regularly appeared on television and radio, and was the consultant psychologist on the Big Brother TV show. Montgomery was 2009 to 2010 President of the APS who describe themselves  as:  ‘…the  peak  body  for psychologists  in  Australia  and  represent  over 24,000 members. 

We advocate for the profession of psychology, support high standards, promote community well-being, and are dedicated to providing benefits to support members.’ The APS certainly supported Bob Montgomery who received a ‘slap on the wrist’ for having sex with his client.

Bob  Montgomery  headed  unethical  MK-ULTRA research  conducted  by  LaTrobe University’s psychology department in 1973 to 1974. The Milgram replica experiments which tested  a  human’s willingness  to  fatally  electrocute  others left  Montgomery’s  subjects traumatised. LaTrobe University is home to Psychology lecturer Gary Dowsett who was part of academia’s 1980s push to legalise pedophilia. Until recently, Dowsett’s LaTrobe University resume  page  featured  a  link  to  an article  he  wrote  in Gay  Information  Quarterly Journal (Spring 1982). Titled, Boiled Lollies and Band-Aids: Gay men and Kids, it stated:

And a new political position is needed... First we have three legal/social questions to win: custody rights for gay men and lesbians; the legal right of pedophiles and their young lovers; and finally the sexual rights of children as a whole.    How different then is that gentle, tentative sexuality between parent and child from the love of a pedophile and his/her lover?’

Gary Dowsett developed  the  Victorian Government’s  Safe  Schools sex  education curriculum which, I heard from multiple sources, contained explicit pornography and resulted in boys gangraping girls at school. As stated in response to PIE’s 1976 campaign to lower the age of  consent:  ‘…what  is  called  sex  education differs from  other  subjects  in  that  it  may determine the immediate and future behaviour of children and change the whole climate of society.’ 94

The timing of Bob Montgomery's 1970s Milgram experiments coincides with Kidman's CIA-funded  Learned  Helplessness  research  that  he  conducted  under  Seligman’s  guidance. During the 1970s, Bob Montgomery was a visiting professor at the Universities of Hawaii and Oregon, MK-ULTRA research hubs. Kidman undertook a PhD in biochemistry at the University of Hawaii.

Antony  Kidman  and  Bob  Montgomery  both promoted  CBT  (cognitive  behavioural therapy) and Health  Psychology  in  Australia.  'Health Psychology'  was  invented  by  Joseph Matarazzo who designed the 2001 torture program that Seligman was second in charge of. An excerpt from a self-help book illustrates the perceived relationship between  these men,and their denial teachings: 95


Unreal Beliefs and Conflicts
The final group of conflicts are caused by unrealistic beliefs, sometimes called the irrational beliefs which are found in everybody. The only thing that varies is the intensity and the number of them we have. These unrealistic expectations we have form pictures in our mind that place us in inevitable conflict and cause, not just conflict but also cause sadness, even despair. Albert  Ellis,  Anthony  Kidman  and  Bob Montgomery as  well  as  several  other authors have one thing in common, they refer in their books to these as the ‘irrational’ beliefs we have about ourselves. What follows is, in fact, the ten irrational beliefs so often quoted: . . .

- Irrational Belief 3: Some people are bad, wicked or evil, and they should be punished for this. . .

- Irrational Belief 5: My bad feelings are caused by something out of my control, so I can’t do anything about them. . .

- Irrational Belief 9: My problems were caused by some events in my past, so that’s why I have my problems now.

Here is my rebuttal to these points:

- Rational Belief 3: Psychologists who rape and torture children are evil criminals who deserve to be brought to justice and punished to the full extent of the law.

- Rational  Belief  5:  My  feelings  stem  from implicit  memories  of  being hypnotised,drugged, raped, and brainwashed. My feelings are outside of my conscious control because they are a symptom of repressed abuse memories. My feelings will dissipate when  I remember and process my abuse.

- Rational  Belief  9:  My  current  physical  and psychological  problems  were  certainly caused by my child abuse.

Antony Kidman, Bob Montgomery, and Paul Wilson were three of Australia’s most prominent psychologists. Authors, university lecturers, and ABC media consultants, they used their positions to promote child abuse denial, stop victims processing their trauma memories, and mislead the public concerning the truth about organized child abuse in Australia. Not surprising if all three men were pedophiles.

Another  Bond  University  lecturer,  Richard  Hicks, was  involved  with  MK-ULTRA research in the 1960s also.96

*           *           *

6

‘The Greater Good...’

I know thy works, and where thou dwellest, even where Satan’s seat is…

Bundaberg
Several people independently described Bundaberg to me as ‘Satan’s throne.’ There is no denying the isolated country town is a microcosm of national coven activity, but why the Prince of Darkness would choose such a shithole for his throne room is beyond me.

Several variables lend credibility to the rumour. Bundaberg sits smack atop one of the major Ley-lines occultists prize. Another clue was the enormous road sign that confronted visitors at the town’s entrance. The blood red sign contained the black silhouette of a huge bull  with  tall  erect horns.  Superficially,  the  bull  poster advertised  the El  Toro  restaurant located in the nearby coastal suburb of Bargara. On a sinister level it represented the horned bull of Mithraism and it indicated that Bundaberg was a coven capital.

Another of Bundaberg’s dark features is the legendary Hummock. The Hummock is a hollow, extinct volcano that dominates the area’s otherwise flat landscape. The cavern inside the Hummock is accessed via a number of the homes that sit on the hill, homes which are only ever sold on to approved coven members. Local Indigenous people said the Hummock features  a  natural  tunnel  system which  joins  the  main  enormous  hollow to surrounding landmarks including the local Catholic school and cemetery. Luciferian rituals are said to take place beneath the impenetrable Hummock.

Bundaberg is characterised by a lack of aesthetics, absence of culture and an obsession with sport. Its main street was once lined with iron laced heritage buildings and enormous trees that created a long cool green arch; but someone clad the buildings, and cut down every tree, creating a repulsive heat.

In the early 1990s, a Bundaberg courthouse employee informed me that he processed one suicide  per  week.  That  statistic  struck  me  as high,  considering  the  town  served  a population of approximately 40,000.

Bundaberg’s air of suicidal futility was well captured in the school war-cry that local children shared with me:

‘Sex! Drugs! Rock-n-roll! Bundy High’s a fuckin’ hole!’

If ever you want to know what is really happening in a community – ask the kids. The local children told me about the 26 primary school students being treated at the hospital’s psychiatric unit for the sexual and physical abuse they experienced at Bundaberg West State School, and which was eventually reported in the local paper. The kids informed me about the Bundaberg East State School principal who liked to watch children do cartwheels in their skirts,  and  who  would  force  himself  upon mothers  in  the  school  classrooms  while they attended  teacher  interviews.  The  school cleaner  complained  to  my  Aunty Beryl  that she would find semen all over the desks and floor. I attended this school for a while in Grade 6.

The most telling testimony came to me in 1998 from Samantha, a Grade 7 student at Woongarra State School. Samantha was an attractive 12-year-old with the body of a 16-year-old and the mouth of a 22-year-old. I met Samantha during a local cricket game. She was staying with my friend who was providing respite to the girl’s mother. The ‘tween-ager’ was reportedly out of control and dating a man in his early twenties.

For  some  reason,  Samantha  decided  to  tell  me all  about  her  life,  including  her involvement  in ‘witchcraft.’  The  child  said  that  she  was introduced  to  witchcraft  by  her classmate whose house she often stayed at. In fact, her entire primary school class had been converted to witchcraft the previous year. ‘It was a really positive thing,’ Samantha explained, ‘because  before  that there  was  a  lot  of  fighting  and  bitchiness, but after  we  all  became involved in witchcraft it united us, and we all got on really well.’ Samantha told me about how the class would cast spells on their teacher. One of these caused her teacher’s chair to break, while another caused the teacher’s car tire to go flat. Apparently, it was really funny, and it gave the students a means of revenge against their ‘mean’ teacher.

Samantha then revealed what she benefited from witchcraft – a sense of control over her out-of-control life. The child was angry. Two years ago, police found her grandmother dead,  mysteriously  slain  with  a fork  the  common  eating  utensil  kind. Samantha wanted revenge against an unknown entity.

I  listened  patiently  to  Samantha  for  about  two hours,  quietly  prompting.    Once satisfied that the girl had shared everything, I made my stand. I looked the child dead in the eye and affirmed: ‘Now listen here and you listen well. You are playing with fire, missy!  Right now,  this  whole  witchcraft  thing  feels  fun,  but  come  your thirteenth  birthday  you  will  be initiated into the next step – which is not fun! Once you take that next step, you will reach a point  of  no  return.  The  next  level  is  human  sacrifice  where  they  murder  little  babies  and children. Believe me, because I’ve seen it. I know it’s real, just as you know  that magic really works. Take it from someone who has seen where all of this goes – stop now before it’s too late! This is your chance, right here, right now, to get out!’

Terror seized the girl’s being and she morphed back into a 12-year-old child. ‘What do I do?’ she pleaded.

‘There’s only one way out of this mess. When I was your age, I noticed that these people were extremely rich, extremely powerful and afraid of no one or thing. But then I noticed that there was a source of power greater than theirs and that when they came up against that power, they lost.  That power source was Jesus Christ. So, I figured that I would rather side with the God that held the greater source of power. The name of Jesus Christ is the only one that is able to free you from what you’ve got yourself into. Right now, Satan is lord over your life. You need to ask Jesus Christ to be Lord. You need to pray to God and ask Him to undo every curse, hex and spell that you are subject to.’

‘I want that! I want that right now!’

That afternoon, Samantha gave her heart to Jesus Christ and accepted a King James Bible. The last I heard, Samantha’s rebellious behaviour had quelled, and she was reading her Bible daily. Ideally, I would have recommended some church for Samantha to attend, but by that stage, I could think of none.

My mother originally moved to Bundaberg to be near her sisters. One sister, Beryl Jenkins, had lived in her beloved ‘Bundy’ the longest. My cousin David Mitchell rightly labelled Beryl ‘an evil bitch’ after holidaying with her as a child. When she wasn’t pretending to be a Christian elder at the local Wesleyan Methodist Church, Aunty Beryl was heavily involved in her family’s true god – basketball.

Beryl was particularly spiteful toward two members of the human race: me and my younger brother Peter. Perhaps this was because Peter and I naturally excelled at everything including  basketball.  I joined a  basketball  team  in  Beryl’s Across  the  Waves club  after shooting a three pointer over Will, Bundaberg’s star African American import, during a social game.  I  have  never  in  my  life  witnessed anything  as  dirty  and  dangerous  as Bundaberg women’s basketball. The saddest moment came when a 15-year-old child on the opposing team broke her ankle. As the girl lay on the bitumen crying in agony, one of my teammates - the town’s only paediatrician - snarled, ‘Get her up!’ This same doctor ran the Bundaberg Rainbow Girls, a Freemasonic youth group for girls.

At the end of my first basketball season, all of Bundaberg’s opposing clubs nominated me  for  the overall  Association  trophy.  However,  Aunty  Beryl and  my  own  club  gave  me nothing. Peter also won a trophy that season, but he was struck down with an illness and bedridden,  weeks  prior  to presentation  night.  Consequently,  Aunty Beryl stripped  Peter’s name   off the trophy and was about to give it to another child when the only club member with  integrity  intervened,  chided  them all,  snatched  the  trophy  and  marched  it  to my mother’s house.

But Aunty Beryl’s full capacity for evil manifested at her church which my family and I initially attended. Beryl’s daughter-in-law, Marcie, attended the same Wesleyan Methodist church. Marcie was my age and so we quickly became acquainted. She invited me to join the church youth group. When Marcie introduced a fellow youth group member who worked as a meter reader to me as being ‘like a spy for us,’ I realised she was consciously involved in a coven  and  had mistakenly  assumed  that  I  was  too.  It’s  a common  assumption  because Satanists can’t fathom the concept of escaping.

Marcie warned me not to associate with a warm, pretty and musically talented youth group member named Lynette.

‘Why not?’ I puzzled.

‘She’s trouble,’ Marcie asserted. ‘She flirts with all the boys.’

‘What do you mean? What boys?’

‘It doesn’t matter,’ she rolled her eyes. ‘She’s just caused a lot of trouble.’

Aunty  Beryl  also  warned  me  against  associating  with  Lynette.  Then  Pastor  Peter Breen’s  daughter  repeated  derogative  things  that  her  mother, Mavis  Breen,  had  uttered against Lynette. The whole church seemed to be gossiping about Lynette behind her back.Their comments were inconsistent with the modest sweet girl that I was observing; so, I did what a Christian is supposed to do – I decided to talk with Lynette and make up my own mind about her. To everyone’s horror, I invited the social outcast to a big Christmas party at Aunty Beryl’s  house, and I  spent  the  entire  evening  getting  to know  Lynette.  Eventually,  I  told Lynette bluntly what people had been saying to me about her, and I asked her what was going on.

Lynette told me about an incident that had occurred when she was 16 years old. Her older  sister  Diane was  about  to  be  married  but  was  killed  in  a car accident  just  south  of Bundaberg, the week before her wedding. On the day of her wedding, the guests who had travelled for the wedding attended her funeral instead. Her bridesmaids, dressed alike in their formal wedding-day dresses, stood by the bride’s coffin instead.

During the chaotic week following her sister’s death, Lynette fell ill. So, her sister’s best friend, a nurse named Wendy, invited Lynette to stay at her house. Wendy’s husband, Adrian, was the son of a church deacon and a notorious philanderer. One morning, Wendy gave Lynette a large dose of codeine medication (Mersyndol) which left the child extremely
drowsy and asleep in the spare bedroom. Soon after Wendy left for work, Adrian entered Lynette’s room, picked her up, carried her to his bed, and sexually assaulted her.

I met with Lynette the day after her disclosure, placed some crayons and paper in front of her, and said, ‘Draw it for me. Show me what Adrian did to you.’

Lynette drew the assault.

‘Now,’  I  continued,  ‘draw  a  thought  bubble above your  head.  Inside  the  thought bubble, write words that you were thinking.’

She wrote, NO!

‘Did you tell your parents about this?’

‘Yes.’

‘What did they do?’

‘They could have had him charged but that would have broken up the church.’

‘So instead, everyone doesn’t know the truth, and someone started the rumour that you flirted with him.’

‘Yes.’

‘And let me guess – your parents have been too preoccupied with your sister’s death to notice how you felt about being assaulted straight after your sister’s death?’

‘Yes.’

‘And just how do you feel?’

‘Like no-one would notice if I was gone.’

‘Do you wish you were gone?’

‘Yes.’

‘Have you thought about killing yourself?’

‘Yes.’

‘Have you thought of how you’d do it?’

‘Yes - overdose on pills…’

I was myself young and inexperienced yet aware that the last time I kept silent about someone’s suicidal ideation they gassed themselves to death in Amsterdam. So, I had a go: ‘Lynette, this is a perfectly normal reaction to something bad that happened to you. Your sister was killed and while you were still in shock from that, and ill, and drugged, an adult sexually assaulted you. You were a child. None of this is your fault. You did nothing wrong.’ I paused. ‘I think you need to tell your parents about how you really feel. And I think someone needs to put a stop to all the church gossip.’

Lynette agreed. In fact, now she felt like standing up and telling the whole church. ‘How about we start with Pastor Breen?  How would you feel about showing him these

drawings?’

‘Yes, I’d like that.’

‘We could go right now if you like?’

‘Yes.’

We went looking for the pastor at the church, but no-one was there. Then an idea dawned on me. I led Lynette into the empty church. ‘I’m going to sit in the pews,’ I suggested.‘You stand at the front behind the pulpit. Pretend that the church is full. Tell the church what you would like them to know.’

Lynette addressed the invisible congregation and expressed what had been tearing her up inside since her sister’s death.

Peter Breen arrived, and I told him, ‘Lynette has something to show you. Show him the drawings Lynette and tell him what you told me.’

Lynette showed the pastor her drawings, carefully explaining each one.

Pastor: ‘I feel sick.’

‘Did you know any of this?’ I asked him.

‘No, Lynette, I’m sorry, I didn’t realise.’

‘Well,’ I continued, ‘practically the whole church is gossiping about a wrong version of it, including my family and yours. Lynette  here  would like to get up in front of the whole congregation and tell everyone the truth. Instead, I think it’s only fair that you locate every single person who has been told the wrong story and tell them the truth.

He nodded. ‘And please don’t tell Mavis [his wife] about this. It’ll ruin her Christmas.’ That evening, Lynette and I met with her parents and filled them in on recent events, including the malicious gossip. I prompted Lynette to express to her parents how she felt. ‘I want to commit suicide,’ Lynette announced.

Her parents became still like stunned mullets.

I softly asked Lynette’s Dad, ‘Where is your daughter right now?

‘Huh?’

‘Where is Diane right now?’

He thought for a moment. ‘In heaven.’

‘What do you think she thinks about that?’

‘Well…she’d be very happy.’

‘And what do you think God thinks of where she is right now?’

‘Well, he would be pleased to have her there.’

‘Okay, so your daughter’s in heaven, she is happy with that arrangement and so is God. God is sovereign, He loves us, but He decided to take her anyhow. I don’t know why God allows such horrible things to happen to us, I just know that we have to trust Him with the situation. While you have been grieving for your eldest daughter, you haven’t noticed that you’re about to lose your youngest.’

The full impact of my intervention with Lynette became apparent many months later. It all began one Sunday morning during church service. The pastor had introduced a new age doctrine to the church which involved having parishioners sit in a circle for service and inviting people to voice their opinion mid-service. One morning, the pastor gave a sermon on God’s image, and he asked people in the service to verbalise their impressions of God.

Troy, a nice young man who had been a Christian for about a week, raised his hand and excitedly offered his opinion: ‘I-I-I think of the song, He’s got the whole world in His hands. I’m-I’m  into  body building,  and  that’s  just  my  thing.  So,  I  see God  like  a  big  Arnie Schwarzenegger holding up the world in his arms!’

The congregation applauded.

Just then, a self-appointed church leader named Spencer Gere shot to his feet and pompously tore Troy’s opinion apart: ‘God is immaterial.  He cannot be compared to mortal being, to some Hollywood actor …’

As  Spencer  Gere  raved  on  like  a  Shakespearean soliloquy,  I  turned  to notice  Troy behind me, deflating like a pool floaty. I arose and spoke, ‘The Bible clearly states that we are made in God’s image.  We have arms – so does God. Troy may not have been a Christian for very long, he may not have been to Bible College and he may not have read a lot of books yet, but  his  understanding  of  God  is just  as  valid.  And  now  I’ll  give  you  all something  more important to focus on – someone in this congregation is involved in Satanism.’

The  congregation  applauded.    Following  the service,  people  approached  me  and stated: ‘Thanks for standing up for me...’ ‘You said what we’ve all been thinking but didn’t have the guts to say…’ ‘That guy has been putting us down for months.’

I was immediately summoned to an emergency meeting attended by Pastor Breen,Spencer Gere, Aunty Beryl, Lynette’s Dad (Kevin) and the pastor’s brother-in-law. Instead of opening the meeting in prayer, Spencer Gere launched into a criticism of me. Yet, every time he went to address me, I was overcome with a deep spiritual repulsion, as though an evil spirit was daring to converse - I promptly cut him off: ‘Don’t you dare speak to me!’

Pastor: ‘You can’t talk to Spencer like that!’

‘He’s not a man of God!’ I snapped.

Pastor: ‘What you are doing is not of God.’

‘How would you know?’

‘Because you’re causing division in the church!’

‘Jesus said he came to separate the sheep from the goats.’

Pastor Breen was dumb.

Aunty Beryl sat quietly with a smug look on her face. Tears welled in my eyes.

Lynette’s father interjected: ‘No, no, no. This is all wrong. This is wrong. Fiona has done a lot to help our family. She saved our daughter’s life!’

But the wolf pack were not interested in words of reason, righteousness or support.

Their criticism faded into background noise as I focussed on Lynette’s father: ‘Fiona, Fiona, ‘he implored.  ‘Do you remember what you said to me?’

‘No,’ I sobbed.

‘You told me three things that helped me get over my daughter’s death.’ He counted the list off his fingers. ‘Where is my daughter now, what does she think about that, and what does God think about that.’

‘Thank you,’ I managed a small smile. Then I left.

The  following  Sunday  I  began  attending  the local Baptist  church  which had  two ministers.  One of the ministers reminded me of a stout Roman Caesar, especially when, mid-sermon, he patted his fat gut and irreverently boasted, ‘And you all know how much I like my food.’ After my third Sunday of attendance, this pastor asked to meet with me. During this meeting he said that Pastor Breen had phoned him and warned him not to let me attend this church  because  I  liked  to  ‘lure  vulnerable young  women  into  questionable counselling situations.’ Pastor Glutton concluded, ‘We do not want you to be a vessel through which the Holy Spirit works in this church.’ Months later, Pastor Glutton caused a split in the church and eventually started up a new church in Bargara with half of the congregation.

At about this time, Aunty Beryl rallied Mum’s siblings plus my father into making a joint complaint to DOCS. Beryl alleged that my mother medically neglected my brother Peter who  was  not recovering from  one  of  the  numerous  mystery illnesses  that seemed  to constantly plague Bundaberg in Biblical proportions. My mother had indeed sought medical attention. She had taken Peter to Bundaberg Base Hospital (notorious for Dr Patel’s killing spree) only to be told that there were no vacant beds and to go home and consult her GP in the morning. Mum took my brother back to his GP who wrote a medical certificate stating that there was nothing wrong with Peter. We later discovered that Peter had a rare virus that ate away the cartilage between two of his vertebrae and his hip. Peter’s GP was later struck of the medical registrar for multiple complaints of malpractice.

My sister-in-law thrust Peter’s medical certificate in Aunty Beryl’s grimacing face while I asserted: ‘Oh you care so much about Peter’s illness. You cared so much that you ripped his name off his basketball trophy!’

Beryl screamed hysterically, ‘Have you spoken to James Kraak yet? Well you should!’ and she left.

James Kraak was the pastor of the new church that my mother and siblings had been attending called the People’s Church. At that stage, I was unaware that Kraak and his wife Helen had ritually abused my siblings at a church holiday camp held at Harvey Bay. I was aware that Kraak’s son had been suspended while under investigation for pedophilia at the remote
primary school he taught at. In fact, I barely knew Pastor Kraak when I promptly drove to his house and said, ‘Beryl told me that I should speak with you. Why?’

Kraak turned red and snapped, ‘She shouldn’t have!’

‘What did you say to her?’

‘I’m not telling you!’

One year, there was a knock at my front door. It was Lynette’s father Kevin, and Peter Breen. Pastor Breen began, ‘Spencer Gere wanted to come, but I didn’t think that would be a good idea.’

Me: ‘Correct.’

‘We’ve had some experiences in the church which have led us to reconsider what you said about someone in the church being involved in Satanism.’

‘What experiences?’

‘One of the ladies was sewing and the sewing machine just picked itself off the table and smashed itself to pieces on the floor.’

Pastor Breen: ‘What can you tell us about Libby Margots?’

I snapped, ‘You went and told that other minister that I liked to lure vulnerable young women into questionable counselling situations! Did you ask Kevin here what he thought of that  conclusion before  making  that  phone  call?  You  have  more than  one  Satanist  at  your church, Peter.  For starters there’s that warlock that you’ve placed on a pedestal and who is picking on new Christians! And what the hell are you doing attending secret prayer meetings with the local Catholic priest at the Catholic Church?! Your every move is dictated by a coven. Here you are asking about Libby when she manipulated you into ordering me not to speak with her again. What the hell was that?!’

Pastor Breen left the building.

Later, sources told me that Peter Breen and his family had come under severe spiritual attack. One person who was dining with the Breens witnessed the whole family suddenly jump to their feet and rush into another room to pray. Pastor Breen left the ministry soon after, and his son Harley Breen whom my brothers befriended and was fond of, became a foul-mouthed comedian who joked about the hypocrisy of his father’s Bundaberg church.

The Libby referred to was Aunty Beryl’s friend. Libby Margots strategically drained the church’s  financial and  human  resources  via  counselling  for her  homosexual  husband  plus financial assistance for her six home-schooled children. Libby’s constant companion was a young woman who introduced herself to me as: ‘I’m Libby’s slave.’ Coven members call new initiates  whom  they  are mentoring  ‘slaves.’  My  friend  who regularly  babysat  for  Libby (another Libby surnamed Fenner) told me about the goats and many other animals that Libby bred in large numbers, all of which would suddenly and mysteriously disappear. It was James Kraak who informed my mother that Libby was secretly in a relationship with a coven member named Robyn Brown.

My family and I quickly caught on to Libby’s game and she knew it. That’s why Libby ordered  Pastor Breen  to  tell  my  mother  and  me  to  stay  away from  her.  However,  Libby couldn’t have felt as threatened as she made out. At a church luncheon she casually walked up to me and asked, ‘Fiona, I saw you at the hospital the other day. What were you doing there?’

‘I was visiting Marcie.’ My cousin had recently suffered a miscarriage.

‘No, it wasn’t that. It was something else. What was it?’

I  was  volunteering  at  the  hospital  but  had  not told  anyone  about  it.  Such  is  the boldness that coven members exhibit when they seek information.

Libby was connected with the owner of one of Bundaberg’s landmarks – the Purple Castle.   This was  a  private  dwelling  which  was  built  in  the shape  of  a  witches’  castle  and painted in telltale purple. A bricklayer who laboured on the purple castle told my mother that he built a large round altar at its centre. The purple castle was owned and occupied by a woman  who  took  in  numerous young  single  mothers.  Baby  diapers  constantly filled  her clothesline. This was a blatant coven breeding centre.

Bundaberg featured a large coven which comprised entirely of members with Scottish heritage.  One member  of  this  was  a  woman  we  called  ‘the hat  lady’  because  she  sold handmade hats at the local market. My family were thrice confronted by this hat lady, once at         a highland dancing event, once at a market and most memorably in Bonnie Jean’s fabric shop. During the latter incident, I stood at a large table glancing through pattern catalogues. My mother and sister-in-law Janine stood on the other side, doing the same. My baby sister Emma wandered nearby.

Suddenly we were surrounded by several people including the hat lady, a man in a full rainbow clown outfit and an obese, dark haired woman.

I snapped to attention. ‘Don’t let them form a triangle around us!’ I ordered my family. ‘Get Emma away from that clown!’

My mother fetched Emma. The hat lady came and stood very close to my right and began  turning  the pages  of  a  catalogue.  The  clown  stood  close  to my left,  pretending  to browse lingerie patterns. The fat lady stood at the counter, purchasing black and purple satin. I turned to the hat lady and affirmed, ‘I rebuke you in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ.’

The clown gasped, ran off to an obese woman who stood at the counter measuring yards  of  black  and purple  satin,  and  whispered  something  to her. The  woman  boasted aggressively, ‘She wouldn’t dare say that to me!’  Yes, I would.

The hat lady thrust her gargoyle face in mine and hissed, ‘Who do you think you are?’

I looked her dead in the eye and affirmed: ‘I-will-be-your-downfall.’

The hat lady flew into a rage, knocked me out of her way and snatched my catalogue. She slammed the book down on the table and began thumbing through the pages.  ‘Rachel!’ she shrieked.

A thin, young store assistant nervously approached the table.

‘Rachel! Did you hear what this lady said?  She rebuked me in Jesus’ name!’

Rachel’s eyes darted about nervously as she scanned my family for clues as to what she should do.

‘We’re just looking at patterns,’ my mother shrugged.

I gave Rachel a look of ‘who’s the crazy’ while twirling my finger around my ear.

‘Well?!’ the hat wench demanded: ‘What are you going to do about it?!’

Rachel stammered, ‘I-I-I don’t know what to do.’

The coven members congregated at the counter while my family and I stood in a small circle and began to pray aloud. Then the group disbanded and returned to normal behaviour, completely ignoring the fact that a group of people were praying aloud in the middle of a fabric shop.

I encountered another Scottish identity while participating in a local production of the musical Les Miserables. John Harbison was an optometrist whose friendship  seemed harmless until he began criticising my absent English boyfriend, and saying, ‘He only thinks he loves you, but he doesn’t.’

I agreed to accompany John Harbison to a restaurant for dinner. Afterwards, we went back  to  his  house for  tea.  We  sat  on  the  back  deck  of his  Queenslander  home,  glancing through art books. I commented on one of the artworks when suddenly, coffee in hand, John Harbison leaned forward, stared at my eyes and declared:

‘Beezlebub, Lord of the Flies!’

‘Huh?’ I shot him a puzzled look. ‘Beezlebub lord of the flies?!  What does that have to do with the price of fish?’

Harbison frantically scanned my face for signs of an impending expected reaction  but it wasn’t forthcoming. He had uttered a trigger phrase, not realising that because I had processed the ritual abuse incidents, the trigger was deactivated. That was Harbison’s first blunder.

His second mistake came after I told him I was visiting England. What I had failed to tell him was that I would only be in England a few short months before travelling to Western Australia. I was interstate when my mother received a letter that John Harbison addressed to me. In his letter he stated that he was in a Scottish pub and had scoured the UK searching for me. ‘WHERE ARE YOU?!’ he screamed in writing that consumed half a page.

‘But  he  knew  where  you  were,’  my  mother deduced.  ‘You  told  him  you  were  in England. Why would he think anything else?’

John’s letter ended with a one page of list of grotesque and seemingly unrelated words including ‘vomit’ and ‘rhinoceros’ that resembled a curse.

The next time I spied John Harbison was during the early hours of the morning, under a full moon. My mother and I recognised him with three men standing together in the next-door driveway. They were dressed in brown robes and pointed hats. The men stood out the front of 46 George St, near the front unit occupied by a South African man named Tony and his four-year-old-son. The little boy often entered our house uninvited and started talking to us. One day we caught him perfectly forming his hands into a satanic sign. We asked him what the sign meant. The child answered and then proceeded to talk us through and demonstrate his enormous repertoire of satanic hand signals.

On another day, the little boy walked into Mum’s bedroom, eating an ice block. When he finished, he showed my mother the stick and asked, ‘What does that say?’

‘Heaven,’ Mum read.

‘Do you know where that is?’ he pointed to the ground. ‘Down there.’

‘Oh, no it isn’t.   That’s where Satan lives.’ Mum pointed to the sky.   ‘Heaven is up there.  God lives up there.’

The boy then pointed at my brother Peter and blurted, ‘We shot Peter last night!’

The previous night, Peter awoke screaming in agony and saying he felt something like electricity shoot up his arm.

That was the last time we saw the little boy. He and his father suddenly disappeared. A while later we spied a cleaning lady at their rented unit. Under the guise of being a potential tenant,  my  sister-in-law Janine  approached  the  cleaner  and inquired  about  the  unit.  The cleaning lady began complaining about the job. She described a strange brownish substance that  was  stuck  to  the bathroom  floor  and  walls,  and  she  invited Janine in  to  look.  Janine returned to us looking a shade paler. ‘It’s everywhere! There’s a great pool of it all over the floor, and it’s splattered all over the walls and ceiling. It looks like someone was butchered in there!’

Following this incident, Bundaberg Centrelink social security office sent my mother a letter informing her that my brother Peter was dead. Then Mum found a little white note that a postal worker had taped to the inside of her Australia Post box which read, ‘Watch mail coming into this box.’ Then we found dried, dead chopped up animals scattered all over our front footpath. Then, on several occasions, taxis continually circled our block and drove past our house from midnight until 3am.

During our final year in Bundaberg, one of my brother’s began dating his classmate Anne Gillespie. Anne was of Scottish heritage and she lived in a Bargara house that was passed from coven family to coven family. Anne showed me a satanic altar that was erected in her back yard. She told my family that babies had been sacrificed in her home and that there was an enormous blood stain on the wooden floor of her upstairs bedroom, beneath the carpet.My brother clearly recalls a time that Anne’s parents drugged him and Anne during a party attended by local coven members.

Anne  was  17  years  old  when  she  told  my mother  that  she  was  frightened  of  her parents and she begged my mother to help her escape Bundaberg.  When my husband and I left Bundaberg, we gave Anne a ride.  As soon as we were gone, police Sergeant  Greg Maloney phoned my mother’s house and hissed to my eight year old brother Michael: ‘Your mother has thirty minutes to tell me where Anne is or else I’ll come and get you all  in my squad car!’ This  was  the  same  Sergeant  who bullied  a  16-year-old  girl  out  of  pursuing legal recourse  for  being  gang  raped  by  10 young Bundaberg  men.  The  girl  assumed  that her boyfriend  was  dropping  her  at  work  when he drove  her  to  a  warehouse where  the perpetrators awaited. These men are now all prominent Bundaberg businessmen. The men proceeded  to rape  the  girl  all  day  and  night.  The  girl attended  Bundaberg  hospital  which reported the rape to local police. Sergeant Greg Maloney subsequently interrogated the girl severely, including verbally abusing and accusing her in a manner inconsistent with police policy  and  procedures. When  the  girl  broke  down  under  this pressure,  Sergeant  Maloney concluded she would not withstand cross-examination, and so he dropped the matter.

My mother returned Sergeant Maloney’s call and informed him that Anne had already town left with me. Sergeant Maloney threatened, ‘We have the power to block every single road in the state, and we’ll do it!  We’ll find them!’

They didn’t find us.

Later, I lodged complaints regarding the sergeant with several bodies including the CJC (criminal justice commission) which was supposedly independent. The young woman from the anti-corruption commission whom I spoke with immediately contacted the Bundaberg’s Sergeant  Maloney  and  informed him  of  my  complaint.  I  correctly  anticipated  this and confronted her on the phone: ‘You just called Bundaberg – didn’t you!’

‘I-ah-er…’

‘Yeah, I know exactly how you lot work.’

Anne’s  parents  placed  a  mental  health  warrant out  for  her  despite  no history  or symptoms of mental illness. In an attempt to secure Anne’s rights, I consulted legal aid, paid a lawyer and studied relevant legislation. The police recorded an interview with Anne at my home. During this, Anne told the police all about the murders and child abuse that she had witnessed  in  her  home.   Anne repeated  this  information  to  the  Department  of Children’s Services  (DOCS).  In response,  DOCS demanded  an  interview  with  my  mother.  DOCS acted more interested in what my mother might have said to influence Anne, rather than Anne’s allegations  against  her  parents  of involvement  in  child  abuse  and  murder.  When DOCS interviewed me, the first thing they asked was whether my brother, who was slightly older than Anne, was in a sexual relationship with his girlfriend.

‘No,’ I responded. ‘So, you’re more interested in pinning a statutory rape case on my brother rather than investigating Anne’s testimony of child abuse and murder in her parents’ home?’

Despite their best efforts, DOCS found nothing against my family – because there was nothing to find. Anne moved interstate with my family where she enrolled in her final year of high school. When she turned 18 years old, she left us to meet her former best friend from Bundaberg at a nearby hotel.  We never saw Anne Gillespie again.

*           *           *

An Offer I Could Refuse
I completed my psychology undergraduate degree two weeks before the birth of my first child. My eldest baby was 18 months old when I underwent a rigorous selection process for  becoming  a  parole officer. I  was  placed  on  a  waitlist  for  a  position in  my  local  NSW area. Meanwhile, I was advised to take a casual position with an interstate parole office which was  suddenly  desperate  for  applicants.  I took  a  casual  position  at  Burleigh  Heads. Most Queensland parole officer positions were casual. I met one employee who had been casual for 11 years and could not get a house loan because his job was not permanent.

At Burleigh, I unwittingly entered an industrial nightmare, ‘the systematic destruction of a fully functioning office,’ as Robyn Farris described it. Regional Manager Rod had seconded Burleigh Heads boss of 20 years, John, against his will to Beenleigh office located 100 km north of       his  workplace and home.  Rod then gave  the  freshly vacated  managerial  position to  his friend  Catherine   Hand   who   held   no   parole  officer experience   or   relevant   tertiary qualifications. Catherine had a visual arts diploma from the Queensland College of Art where I     obtained my first degree. Upon assuming the management position, Catherine bullied out the experienced officers who had worked harmoniously together at Burleigh for 14 years. Catherine replaced these with young, inexperienced females, including dumb blonde looking me.

I  excelled  at  the  job  tasks  and  thoroughly enjoyed  working  with  offenders. I  had  a knack for  court  report  writing,  understanding legislation, and  court  work. My  first  court performance was the talk of the office, and my fast brain coped easily with a caseload of 100 offenders. It was the office politics that concerned me. For three months I  quietly observed Catherine Hand bully the experienced staff, place them under excessive  scrutiny, label them ‘dead wood,’ and slash their caseloads. On one occasion, Catherine pinned an outstanding teenage parole officer named Chris to the wall, placed her fat red lips inches from his face,and screamed at the top of her voice in front of reporting offenders: ‘YOU’RE A FUCKING IDIOT!’ The Federal Police subsequently snatched Chris up for employment.

Catherine  Hand’s  offer  was  announced  one Friday afternoon  following  a  training conference  at Tugun Life  Saving  Club.  I  found  myself  sitting alone  with  at  a  café  table with Catherine who fiddled with the ring on her finger. It was gold and bore an Order of the Easter Star encircled pentagram. The pentagram centre contained a black stone, while each point featured a different coloured gemstone: blue, green, red, white and yellow.

‘Fiona, have you seen my ring?’ Catherine asked.

‘No,’ I lied.

‘This is my coven ring. Each gemstone represents one of the women in our coven. I’m the diamond. This one is Megan [a Queensland College of Art pottery  teacher]. Every  two years, no matter where we are in the world, the five of us meet up. Fiona, if you play your cards right, you’ll go far in management.’

I eyeballed Catherine and sternly affirmed: ‘I’m not management material.’

The  following  Monday,  I  submitted  detailed complaint  against  Catherine  Hand’s bullying behaviour to upper management. Upon discovering this, Catherine called me into her office where Southport Area Manager Peter Smales sat smirking. Catherine Hand pinned me against the wall like a white-collared psychopath and shoved her face in mine. She smiled like a Cheshire cat and spat, ‘You have ten minutes to vacate your office!’


The  Corrective  Services  Regional  Manager subsequently  sent  me  a  letter which notified me I had been temporarily filling in for some woman named Helen who had been on maternity leave (news to me) and that I was being let go. Rod stipulated in writing that I had done ‘nothing wrong.’

Three  Burleigh  parole  officers  and  I  lodged successful  WorkCover  compensation claims  against Catherine  Hand. The  Industrial  Relations commissioner  also  upheld  my complaint against Catherine, openly called her a bully during the first round of hearings. With disgust he declined Catherine Hand’s ridiculous settlement offer and he decided for me that I  would  be  pursuing  the  matter  further. Yet  I  decided  to  leave  Catherine  behind  me and concentrate on my new job offer, because I am not that litigious.

However,  Catherine  Hand  pursued  me,  with  the full  blessing  of  the  Queensland Department of Corrective Services. Catherine Hand used government expenditure to hire a private  detective who  sat  in  a  car  outside  my  house photographing  me. Then  she  went through my resume and phoned previous employers looking for dirt on me. Then she phoned my next two bosses and told them to get rid of me. Finally, I hired a barrister who phoned the Queensland Department of Corrective Service State Manager and requested the Department cease harassing me.

State Manager: ‘We can do whatever the fuck we like!’

My barrister: ‘No you fucking can’t!’

Meanwhile, the Department hired a professional mediator to investigate and mediate Burleigh Heads office. The man interviewed each employee separately and then coordinated a  group confrontation  where  the  office  had  the opportunity  to  vent  their  experiences.Catherine Hand subsequently broke down crying and apologised to young Chris who told me, ‘I almost felt sorry for her.’

I was not invited to that healing opportunity, which is a shame because that is the point at which I developed noticeable PTSD symptoms (separate from those attached to my child abuse flashbacks). This bullying experience marked a permanent personality change.

Catherine  Hand  and  her  co-conspirators  were subsequently  promoted,  and  the Burleigh office was eventually cleared of all its ‘dead wood.’

A decade later, the bullied senior staff vouched for my character to Gavan Palk who supervised my psychology registration. I reeled in horror the day Gavan informed me he was the Corrective Services boss who first hired Catherine Hand.

‘YOU hired her?!’


‘I know,’ he lamented. ‘I’m sorry, I had no idea.’

7

Conspiracy Fact

Anyone who challenges the prevailing orthodoxy finds himself silenced with surprising effectiveness.

- George Orwell

9/11
In October 2002, I was in New York City, peering out a massive window of the World Finance Centre at the construction scene below. Next to me stood Eddie, the  once-jolly janitor who now suffered PTSD.

‘Were you here that day?’ I asked.

‘Ma’am, I was standing right here. Something made me stop and look out this here window. I never done that before. But something made me do it. I saw a black van pull up on that, there road. And no vehicles ever stop there: you can see how busy it is. Two guys dressed in black suits and white shirts got out, fiddled with a black box in their hands. Then they got back into the van and drove off. Minutes later BOOM! them bombs went off. It was like watching a movie. I didn’t believe it was real. I could see people up there deciding whether, or not to jump. I been telling everyone what happened. Then the managers came to me and said, “Eddie, you gotta stop talking about this to people. People gonna think  you’re crazy. You should just worry about your job.” But I said, “Why should I shut up? Why do you care about what I say?! Why don’t you care about those people that died? You should care about the people that died!” There was a childcare in that building. Full of little children! Trains full of people starved to death!’

‘Who do you think did it?’ I asked.

‘The government did it!’ Eddie punched the air, his eyes widened like a wild animal.

‘Man, our own government did it!’

‘I believe you, Eddie. I believe you…’

*           *           *

PATCON 97
Since 1976, the FBI has trained heads of Australian law enforcement organisations at their national academy in Quantico, Virginia. An expressed goal of the training is to create collaboration between international law enforcement agencies and governments. In 2006 the FBI  launched  a  Counter-Terrorism  program  for  Australian  law enforcement officials.  One graduate described the program as follows:

This place is like the temple where leaders of law enforcement come to receive their mission - don’t ever lose the magic.

NSW Police Commissioner Anthony Raymond Lauer trained at the FBI Academy. Tony Lauer, who became Commissioner in 1991, resigned prematurely in 1996 due to the Wood Royal Commission into NSW police corruption. Lauer succeeded Commissioner John Avery (my perpetrator). Lauer previously trained with the Australian Army at Holsworthy in 1957 and headed the Freemason Grand Lodge of NSW and ACT.

Commissioner  Lauer  attended  the  FBI  Academy just  when  the  FBI  instigated  an infiltration program  code-named  PATCON  (short  for  ‘Patriot Conspiracy’). ‘Patriot’  loosely defines anti-government, racist, antisemitic, and/or Christian ‘extremists.’ PATCON officially ran from 1991-93 and consisted of FBI undercover agent provocateurs posing as members of a fictional extremist group, to infiltrate target Patriot groups and gather intelligence related to past, present, or future crimes. The 1991 prosecution goals included: conspiracy to commit murder, illegal possession of weapons, and money laundering. Yet no criminal convictions resulted. Instead, PATCON proved to be a training exercise for Ruby Ridge,  Waco, Oklahoma, 9/11, and Australia’s Port Arthur. The operation also provided preparation for  the myriad of anti-terror  laws  introduced  to Australia  post-9/11,  and  the subsequent establishment  of ‘Fixated Persons’ police-psychiatric detainment facilities in Australia and the UK.

Social Media Psychological Operations
Social media is a psychological war zone. The secret services, military, Vatican, cults, and various police organisations employ thousands upon thousands of social media agents. The role of these agents is to monitor, identify, target, and infiltrate individuals and activist groups opposed to the Luciferian global agenda. Social media agents target those who speak out  against  such  controversial  issues  as the  global  child  sex  trafficking  operation, 5G, vaccination, immigration, and the ‘Safe Schools’ program. After six years of battling it out on the internet, the agents’ behavioural patterns have become obvious to me, and I conclude that approximately 90 percent of the higher profile alternative media identities are in fact agents, paid to control the narrative regarding controversial topics, with the primary goal of swaying  public  opinion and subduing  the  masses  from  revolting. These  agents  employ Hegelian Dialectic methods and pretend to argue a topic, when in fact they are all working toward  the  same  goal.  They  muddy  the  waters  with  endless  rhetoric  until  the  public  is confused and are dissuaded from investigating the truth of a matter.

The  following  three  news  articles  provide  insight to  this  type  of  psychological operation.  The authorities  typically  claim  their  operation  is to  target  extremists  -  when  in practise they target government dissidents - and they throw in the obligatory terms ‘Russia’ and ‘Isis’ as if this justifies their operation.

BRITISH ARMY CREATES TEAM OF FACEBOOK WARRIORS
Ewen MacAskill, The Guardian, 31 Jan 2015.

The   British   army   is   creating   a   special   force of  Facebook  warriors, skilled   in psychological operations  and  use  of  social  media  to  engage in  unconventional warfare  in  the  information  age. The  77th  Brigade,  to  be  based  in  Hermitage, near Newbury,  in  Berkshire,  will  be  about  1,500-strong  and  formed  of  units drawn  from across the army. It will formally come into being in April.

The brigade will be responsible for what is described as non-lethal warfare. Both the Israeli  and  US army already  engage  heavily  in psychological  operations.  Against  a background of 24-hour news, smartphones and social media, such as Facebook and Twitter, the force will attempt to control the narrative. The 77th will include regulars and reservists and recruitment will begin in the spring. Soldiers with journalism skills and familiarity with social media are among those being sought.

The Israel Defence Forces have pioneered state military engagement with social media, with dedicated teams operating since Operation Cast Lead, its war in Gaza in 2008-9. The IDF is active on 30 platforms – including Twitter, Facebook, Youtube and Instagram

– in six languages… It has been approached by several western countries, keen to learn from its expertise.

The  creation  of  77th  Brigade  comes  as  the commander of  Nato special  operations headquarters Lt Gen Marshall Webb, speaking in Washington this week, expressed concern  about Russia and  about Isis. ‘Special  operations  headquarters is uniquely placed to address this,” he said…

*           *           *

CYBER WARFARE: ARMY CREATES ‘TWITTER TROOPS’
Alistair Bunkall, Defence Correspondent, Sky News, 31 Jan 2015.

The British Army is setting up a brigade of soldiers tasked with tackling groups like Islamic State - using social media. Members of 77 Brigade have been trained to use guerrilla tactics and will be experts in psychological warfare operations. The Army hopes the brigade will impact the traditional battlefield using non-lethal techniques including social media to reflect the digital age. Using creative thinking it  is hoped that 77 Brigade will influence the minds and shape the behaviour of the enemy and local populations. This has led to the early nickname "Twitter troops" for the Brigade, which will be formally created on 1 April.

Its members will support mainstream military tactics.

It will draw its members from the regular and reserve forces across the Army, Navy and RAF - with 42% reservists - and will also seek civilians with specialist skills to work alongside their military colleagues…

*           *           *

TWITTER EXECUTIVE FOR MIDDLE EAST IS NRITISH ARMY ‘PSYOPS’ SOLDIER
Ian Cobain, Middle East Eye, 30 Sept 2019.

Head of editorial for MENA is part-time officer in the 77th Brigade, an 'information warfare' unit which has worked on 'behavioural change' projects in the region.

The senior Twitter executive with editorial responsibility for the Middle East is also a part-time officer in the British Army’s psychological warfare unit, Middle East Eye has established. Gordon MacMillan, who joined the social media company's UK office six years ago, has for several years also served with the 77th Brigade, a unit formed in 2015 in order to develop ‘non-lethal’ ways of waging war. The 77th Brigade uses social media platforms such as Twitter, Instagram and Facebook, as well as podcasts, data analysis and audience research to wage what the head of the UK military, General Nick Carter, describes as “information warfare”.

Carter says the 77th Brigade is giving the British military ‘the capability to compete in the  war  of narratives  at  the  tactical  level’;  to  shape perceptions  of  conflict.  Some soldiers  who  have served  with  the  unit  say  they  have  been engaged  in  operations intended to change the behaviour of target audiences.

What exactly MacMillan is doing with the unit is difficult to determine, however: he has  declined  to answer  any  questions  about  his  role,  as  has Twitter  and  the  UK’s Ministry  of  Defence  (MoD). While clearly  engaged  in  propaganda,  the  MoD was reluctant to use that word to describe the unit’s operations. His involvement with the 77th Brigade was made public when he disclosed it on his page at LinkedIn, the online professional  networking  site. As  well  as  outlining  his  responsibilities at Twitter, MacMillan  wrote  that  he  had  an  interest in  politics  and  international affairs,  had trained at Sandhurst, the British military academy, ‘and am a reserve officer in the British Army serving in 77th Brigade, which specialises in non-lethal engagement His page has recently been edited to remove all references to his service with 77th Brigade.

*           *           *

Fixated Persons
Victims of government child trafficking who seek justice are being labelled ‘Fixated Persons’ and finding  themselves  targeted  for  detainment. NSW,  Queensland,  and  Victoria recently constructed Fixated  Threat  Assessment  Centres (FTAC)  which  are  attached  to Australian  state police  forces.  These  Orwellian  facilities  are staffed  by  specialist  police, forensic psychiatrists, forensic psychologists, and Special Intelligence  Officers (SOI). Detainees are referred to FTAC's by ‘family, neighbours, counter-terrorism authorities, or local police’ and held for 14 days without legal representation or family knowledge.

The FTAC's detain people for crimes they may commit in the future,98 thereby violating a  fundamental  tenet  of  Western  law  which determines  citizens  are  innocent  until proven guilty. The perpetrators circumvent this law by never formally charging the detained citizen with a crime. Holding an individual for mental health or terror reasons is apparently legal. As in  Nazi Germany,  laws  are  not  broken,  merely  adjusted to  accommodate  an  underlying agenda.

The people behind this Totalitarian regime define ‘Fixated Persons’ as:

- Victims of crime,

- Typically aggrieved at being wrongly done by,

- Seeking justice,

- Litigious and chronic complainers,

- Exposing government corruption or treason,

- Posting  too  much  on  social  media  about government  officials  and  other  public identities,

- Making too many FOI (freedom of information) and document requests,

- Repeatedly lodging complaints to politicians or local council,

- Having strong religious beliefs or ideology.

The above definition is broad and vague. It fails to specify what constitutes ‘too much’ of a particular action or ‘too strong’ a belief. The concept of ‘Fixated Person’ has not been legally  formalised  but left  for  government  agents  to  interpret, adapt, arbitrarily  apply  to whatever  target  they choose.  As  such,  the  above  definition  can be  loosely  interpreted  to describe victims of government child trafficking who speak publicly about, and actively seek justice  and  redress  for, the  heinous  crimes  committed  against  us. The definition  is  being misused to profile victims and whistle-blowers like me.

The British-based trafficking network’s primary objective is to discredit victims of their global  child trafficking  operation.  Their  agents  achieve  this by  labelling  targets  psychotic, criminal  or  even better  – criminally  insane.  Their  traditional modus  operandi  was  to  lure targets   into   a ‘health   assessment’   where  dirty   doctors labelled them   non-compliant psychotics  (as  when Bond  University  psychology  and criminology  lecturers  conspired  with dirty NSW and Queensland cops in their failed attempt to frame me). This method is now superseded by a formalised kidnapping and detainment operation in three Australian states. FTACs promise to re-victimise child trafficking survivors via the same abuse methods the CIA perpetrators originally used on us.

The expressed purpose of Australia’s anti-terror laws introduced by Freemason and Satanist John Howard in 2002 was to stop Islamic terrorism. Instead, the laws are being used against citizens seeking to expose political party corruption. Let us examine  who has been genuinely targeted by these FTAS teams:

- Phil Galea was kidnapped by Victorian police in August 2016, falsely charged under anti-terror laws, and is still detained in solitary confinement without trial. Politicians and police are preventing Phil from appearing before a judge and jury, which would expose the ‘Fixated Persons’ wrought.

- Fiona  Wilson,  a  former  Origin  Energy executive, was  involuntarily  detained  and injected with drugs in the Brisbane FTAC for blowing the whistle on the coal-seam gas industry. Wilson was left with PSTD.

- A grandmother who complained to authorities that her 12-year-old granddaughter was being raped and sex trafficked by her father was declared a ‘Fixated Person’ by a judge   who   referred   her   to the   FTAC   where  she   was   placed   under perpetual surveillance and her passport stamped to prevent her leaving Australia.

Australia’s Family Courts, child social services (renamed DOCS, FACS, etc) and foster care  system have  facilitated  government  child  trafficking  since their  inception.  The  same occurs  in  the  UK  and USA.  Every  day  for  five  years, desperate  parents contacted  me  and shared the same story: the government fabricated grounds to steal, prostitute, disappear, kill their kids. The FTACs make the Australian leg of the global child trafficking operation far easier and simpler to implement and maintain.

Some advice: if you discover your child is being sexually abused by your partner – take the  child and  disappear.  Some  mothers  have  had  success by  inducing  the  husband  to physically assault them and using their resultant injuries as evidence for a domestic violence order and fleeing with the child. If Child Protective Services start sniffing around your family run!  Leave  at  the  first  hint.  Forfeit  all material  goods,  pack  your  kids,  a  loaned car, documents, cash, and some clothes, and just disappear. Tell no-one where you go. Find fake IDs and wait it out in some remote location until the kids are grown.

Australia’s foster care system is a massive child sex trafficking operation.
It is concerning that neighbours can refer victims to the FTAC, considering a common tactic is to have agents move in next door to victims and threaten and harass them. It is also concerning  when  the Centres  are  staffed  by  perpetrators. Further,  Queensland’s  Fixated Threat Assessment Centre is staffed by clinicians from the Queensland Forensic Mental Health Service, who employ Bond University forensic psychologists.

Secret Intelligence Operatives (SIO)

The FTAC's plant police informants called Secret Intelligence Operatives (SIO) to entrap victims  for detainment  in  their  tax-funded  MK-ULTRA facilities.  SOI  agents  employ  the following methods:

- Pretend to be right-wing extremists.

- Stage and film fake arrests for fake terror breaches.

- Befriend and physically access targets.

- Set  the  target  up  for  arrest  for  associating with  ‘terrorists’  and  engaging  in  ‘terror activities.’

Their modus operandi was demonstrated in a 2008 Melbourne case where a police agent  called  ‘SIO 39’  was  cross  examined  regarding  his entrapment  of  an  Islamic  terrorist cell.99  SIO  39 ‘told  the  court  he  was  a  Victoria  Police officer  working  undercover  with  the covert unit of the security intelligence group.’ The SIO agent inserted himself into a terror cell where he taught the leader how to make a bomb. The prosecution asked SIO 39:

‘You were making a very deliberate effort to befriend him, weren't you? … Consistent with the directions you had been given?’

‘Yes, that's right,’ said the agent.

The FTAC’s entrapment methods are classic PATCON tactics where agent provocateurs lure victims into engaging in behaviour which constitutes a breach of legislation and subjects them to search and seizure laws.

In  2018,  I  was  simultaneously  targeted  by  six agents  connected  to  Fixated  Threat Assessment Centres in Brisbane, Sydney and Melbourne. They were notably connected to NSW Police Commissioner Mick Fuller who held locational jurisdiction. All secret intelligence type  agents  base  grooming conversation  on  real  life  events,  to  appear more convincing. Hence one SOI agent told me he trafficked drugs in Sydney for the Australian Federal Police. The  agents  tried  to  trick  me  into breaching  Australia’s  strict  anti-terror  laws  and provide justification for police to raid my property and arrest me. Their entrapment methods included unsuccessfully encouraging me to:

- Hand them administrative control of my websites and social media pages, under the guise of improving my sites.

- Become a board member and so assume legal responsibility for an agent-created and controlled child abuse advocacy group.

- Excessively post about certain politicians on social media.

- Publicly incite social discord by joining the agents’ call for an ‘uprising.’

- Endorse  vigilante  behaviour  including  t-shirts labelled  ‘Pedo  Hunters’ which  were decorated with images of a hangman noose / gun sight target.

- Provide  a  list  of  known  perpetrators  to  be targeted  for  vigilante  style  justice (i.e.,premeditated murder).

- Physically associate with agent provocateurs posing as extreme right terrorists.

- Accept money and trafficked commodities from ‘terrorists’ and ‘terror activities.’

- Accept unregistered guns under the guise of protecting myself from the pedophile network.

- Provide  a  list  of  all  fellow  government trafficking  victims  I  knew, including  their locations and testimonies, under the guise of making a documentary.

Having studied Australian anti-terror legislation and statutory interpretation, I quickly recognised how and why the above activities list might be interpreted as breaching our vague counter-terrorism laws. Associating with known terrorists, wearing uniform outfits, accepting money  from  terrorists, possessing  illegal  weapons,  and  conspiring to  commit  murder  constitute grounds for immediate arrest and detainment.

Paul Mullen: MK-ULTRA Psychiatrist
The  Australian  and  UK  definition  of  ‘Fixated Person’  and  the  associated  Fixated Research Groups  and  Fixated  Threat  Assessment  Centres are  the  brainchild  of  CIA-MI6 forensic psychiatrist Paul Mullen. Here are some of Mullen’s secret service career highlights:

- Worked with MK-ULTRA Subproject 84 hypnosis doctors including Peter W. Sheehan.

- Court-appointed  expert  in  the  MK-ULTRA Chelmsford  Hospital  medical  negligence case.

- First non-military defence expert to enter the Guantanamo Bay detention centre, site of Seligman’s CIA torture program.

- Heads  the  Fixated  Person  Research  Groups linked  to  MI6,  FBI,  and  Tavistock  (UK’s mind control hub).

- Contracted by the British Royal Family.

- Interviewed Melbourne Hoddle Street shooter, Julian Knight.

- Assessed alleged Port Arthur shooter, Martin Bryant.

- Publicly presented the Christchurch NZ massacre script and shooter profile two weeks before the event.

- Supports false memory writings of CIA psychologist Elizabeth Loftus.

The book Dope Inc. (1978) was meticulously researched and proved beyond all doubt that the British Royal Family are the ultimate benefactors of the CIA coordinated, global drug trafficking operation.  The  royals  are  also  the  financial benefactors  of  the  global  child  sex trafficking operation. Prince Andrew was accused of raping minors trafficked by convicted pedophile billionaire Jeffrey Epstein. One of Prince Andrew’s victims, Virginia Roberts Giuffre, had    her photo taken with him. Recall the Royal Family were caught on film  teaching princesses Elizabeth and Margaret to Nazi salute. Recall pop star Mick Jagger referred to Queen Elizabeth as ‘Chief Witch.’ 100 I witnessed the queen preside over the ritual murder of 11 kids at St James Anglican Church in Sydney City when I was 11 years old.

Port Arthur: Paul Mullen was the court-appointed psychiatrist who assessed Martin Bryant, the young man forced to change his plea to guilty and so receive 35 life sentences for the Port Arthur massacre. After a 3.5-hour interview, Mullen claimed Martin Bryant possessed an IQ of 60. It is neurologically impossible for someone whose intelligence level sits at the bottom  2%  of  the population  to  kill 19  people  in  20  seconds. That  head  shot  rate  is  not achievable by the world’s most elite snipers, whose intelligence level must sit in the top 1% of the population because high visual-spatial IQ is essential for accurate shooting ability.

Christchurch Shooting: Paul Mullen ‘coincidentally’ popped up at four mass shootings in Australia and New Zealand. He was working in Melbourne in 1987 where he interviewed the Hoddle Street shooter, Julian Knight. Then he moved to Aramoana in New Zealand in time for David Gray’s 1990 shooting massacre. Then he returned to Melbourne in time for the Tasmanian Government to request he interview Martin Bryant in 1996. And he just happened to be visiting New Zealand for the 2019 mass shooting in Christchurch. Two weeks prior to the Christchurch massacre, Mullens spoke at Melbourne’s Sofitel hotel where he released an exact script for what unfolded in NZ, and profiled the white, right-wing extremist type who poses the new terror threat, and which fit the alleged shooter.

False  Memory  Fan: 
Paul  Mullen’s  research interests  include: Litigious  and  Chronic Complainers, and the Long-Term Impact of Childhood Sexual Abuse - the ideal combination for silencing outspoken victims of CIA child trafficking. Paul Mullen was quoted in a 1994 False Memory Syndrome Foundation newsletter as saying:101

The precedence accorded child sexual abuse has also had negative consequences, socially and scientifically, particularly in distracting attention away from  physical and emotional abuse and from the whole context of disadvantage and neglect in which the   sexual abuse often occurs.

Not  surprisingly,  Paul  Mullen  is  a  child  abuse denier  and  an  advocate  of  Elizabeth Loftus’ discredited false memory opinion. Mullen claimed, ‘the basis of the recovered-memory theory was flawed … there were no specific symptoms that came from childhood abuse.’102 In his  book Childhood Sexual  Abuse:  An  Evidence-Based  Perspective, 103  Mullen  denies  the phenomenon  of  repressed trauma  memories  being  stored  in  the right  implicit  brain  and accessible via appropriate therapy:

On the other side of the debate have been equally powerful defences of the capacity of  therapists  to bring  to  consciousness  repressed  memories  that on  occasion,  it  is asserted, provide detailed and veridical narratives of actual abuse… However, contrary to these claims, the main problem following trauma is an inability to forget rather than a complete loss of the memory of the event… Psychogenic amnesia following trauma may occur, but usually the individuals are well-aware of the gap in their memory.

There are claims that memories of CSA are laid down in the brain through a unique process that does not apply to other forms of trauma and that can be recovered via the sensorimotor system... This remains an unproven hypothesis…

Current theories of memory emphasize that memories are not replicas of the events themselves but   imperfect   and   subjectively  modified  records of   how   we   have experienced those events…

That it is possible to influence the memories of others by suggestion is established (Loftus, 1993) . . . Both client and therapist may believe they are overcoming the forces of  repression  and  revealing the  true  narrative  of  the  abuse,  but  how much the expectations,  assumptions,  and  theoretical commitments  of both  participants  are producing a new construction remains in question.

When a repressed memory contains a detailed image of a location the victim never visited apart from during her child abuse, and when the victim physically visits that place as an adult and discovers everything in that abuse location is exactly as the victim recalled it during a flashback or therapy that constitutes evidence of reliable repressed child abuse memories. I experienced this in 1993 when I visited Sutherland Hospital. There is no record of my ever having been admitted or treated at Sutherland Hospital. My parents  never took me  there  during my  Sydney  childhood.  Yet  I  knew  the  layout  of an  internal  ER  room  at Sutherland Hospital. I visited the hospital at age 23 in search of the room I awoke in after suffocating in a grave at age eight years. A triage nurse kindly led me to a room out of public bounds which looked exactly as I remembered and drew it. The walls were clad in pale blue tiles, the  door  and  furniture  were  positioned  exactly like  in  my  therapy  drawing,  and  the original oxygen bottle sat at the head of the very stainless-steel table I was laid on. ‘This is where you would have come if you had suffocated,’ the nurse told me.

Dirty Doctors
Corydon Hammond said in his legendary Greenbaum Speech:

When you start to find the same highly esoteric information in different states and different countries,  from  Florida  to  California,  you  start to get  an  idea  that  there’s something  going  on that is  very  large,  very  well  coordinated,  with a great deal  of communication  and  systematicness  to what’s  happening.  So,  I  have  gone from someone kind of neutral and not knowing what to think about it all, to someone who clearly believes ritual abuse is real, and that the people who say it isn’t are either naive like people who didn’t want to believe the Holocaust - or they’re dirty.

Paul  Mullen,  who  denies  the  true  nature  of  child abuse  induced  trauma,  who embraces the pro-pedophile writings of discredited Elizabeth Loftus, who hangs around CIA MK-ULTRA torture and mind control facilities, who leaps the Tasman sea in time for everyAustralasian  mass  shooting,  and who,  despite  being  a  ‘world  renown  expert’ excluded irrefutable evidence that it was neurologically impossible for a mentally disabled man with an IQ of 60 to have committed the crime (thereby condemning an innocent man to life in prison) is the main driving force behind new Orwellian legislation and protocols which are being used to effectively target and silence vocal victims and witnesses to government organised child sex trafficking.

next
Justice denied
source
https://fionabarnettblog.files.wordpress.com/2019/10/2nd-ed.-eyes-wide-open-book-7th-october-2019.pdf