Eaters of Children
The Pedocracy Exposed
By Johnny Cirucci
Chapter 2
The Beast Transformed
21 March 1475: Two year old boy found murdered, the victim of a ritual
sacrifice, in Trento, Italy on Easter Sunday.
The small Simon, a little boy from Trent, was slayed on the 21st March,
1475 A.D., on Maundy-Thursday during Holy Week. The Jews of this town
wanted to celebrate their Passover in their own way; so they secretly
abducted the small boy and carried him to the house of the Jew Samuel.
During Holy Week on Maundy-Thursday, the day before Good Friday,
“and” on the day before the outlawed “Perfidious Passover”, about three
hours after supper, the little boy, like children do, was sitting in front of his
parents’ house. Neither his father nor mother were home at the time as
they were at Church. It was at this time that the Jew Tobias approached
the child, who was not quite 30 months old, and while speaking kindly and
offering the boy a piece of money, picked him up and carried him at once to
the house of the Jew Samuel.
When night fell, the twin brothers Saligman and Samuel, with Tobias,
Vitalis (Veitel), Moses, Israel and Mayr, undressed the little boy and
unmercifully butchered him. While Moses strangled him with a
handkerchief as he lay across Samuel’s knee, pieces of flesh from his neck
were cut with a knife and the blood collected in a bowl. At the same time,
they punctured the naked offering with needles and murmured Hebrew
curses. They then cut pieces of flesh from the boy’s arm and legs and
collected the blood in pots.
Finally the torturers imitated the crucifixion by holding the twitching body
upside down and the arms outstretched... ~ St. Simon of Trent.com[32]
The attacks upon Judaism by the Catholic Church, especially in the Middle
Ages, were almost as vicious as the literal Crusades against Christians
Were the Vaudois and Valdneses the Remnant ekklēsia, maintaining the
Truth of Christ against the Dragon?
Certainly, Rome thought so, and Crusaders pursued the inoffensive Alpine
Christians with vicious ruthlessness perhaps even unseen in Palestine.
To combat the “heretics”, Rome needed a special office designed to use
every means necessary to force the wayward children back into the fold.
As the Crusader/Inquisitor saying went; aut Mass aut mortem — be at
Mass or be dead.
In haughty power did Rome seek to bring all Christians under her
dominion.
“You said, ‘I am forever — the eternal queen!’ ... lounging in your
security and saying to yourself, ‘I am, and there is none besides me. I
will never be a widow nor suffer the loss of children.’”
~ Isaiah 47:7-8
(NIV)
xxiv
Christians have been thrilled by Papal propaganda depicting heroic
Crusaders battling bloodthirsty Muslims but the picture erased from
history is that of knights ruthlessly slaughtering Christian men, women and
children in the most heinous fashion they could. ~ Secret History
[33]
Slightly better known (because it serves the Luciferian “clash of
civilizations” Hegelian Dialectic
[ii]
) is the persecution of Jews by Rome.
Suspiciously, anti-Semitism was already being stirred in Trento before the
heinous incident.
Shortly before Simon went missing, Bernardine of Feltre, an itinerant
Franciscan preacher, had delivered a series of sermons in Trent in which
he vilified the local Jewish community. ~ Wikipedia
[34]
A more detailed account is found in the Jewish Encyclopedia. [italics
suspended]
The Disappearance of Simon.
The harmonious relations between the Christians and the Jews in Trent had
excited the anger of the semi-demented Franciscan friar Bernardinus of
Feltre, who was a son of a notorious enemy of the Jews. In his Lenten
sermons (1475) he endeavored to incite the people against them, but instead
provoked displeasure on the part of the Christians. Then he predicted that
at the next Jewish Passover a ritual murder would occur. In accordance
with this prediction, the child Simon, twenty-eight months old, disappeared
on March 23, 1475. Bernardinus of Feltre, Johannes Schweizer (a neighbor
of the Jews), and, at last, the excited people themselves declared that the
child would be found among the Jews; but a careful search through the
Jewish quarter, ordered by Bishop Hinderbach and executed by the podestà
of Trent, Johann Sala, proved fruitless.
On the eve of Easter Monday, March 26, some Jews noticed the body of a
child in the river, near the house of one of their number named Samuel.
Without a moment’s delay three of them, Tobias (a physician), Samuel, and
Angelus, hastened to notify the bishop, but were not admitted to his
presence. The podestà, however, visited the house of Samuel, took
possession of the child’s body, and ordered the arrest of those present —
Samuel, Angelus, Tobias, Israel, Bonaventura, Toaff, and a second
Bonaventura (the cook).
After a medical examination of the body it was
stated that death was the result of violence, not of accidental drowning. A
baptized Jew, Johann of Feltre, who had been a prisoner for several years
for theft, seized the apparent opportunity to shorten the term of his
imprisonment by declaring that the Jews use the blood of Christians for
ritual purposes at the Passover.
On the strength of this allegation all the
members of the Jewish community, women and children included, were
arrested. The proceedings against them began on March 28. The accused
pleaded not guilty, and denounced two men: Johannes Schweizer, who had
access to the river flowing by Samuel’s house and who for a long time had
been an enemy of the Jews; and the German tailor Enzelin. Johannes
Schweizer and his wife were arrested, but proved an alibi as regards the
23d of March, though only for the daytime; they were finally liberated from
prison in a “miraculous” manner.
Torture Suffered by the Jews.
Then began days and nights of torture for the Jews, in which numerous
methods of compelling “confession” were tried. For a long time the
sufferers remained steadfast and faithful; but after weeks of torture had
weakened the will, they “confessed” in the exact words dictated by their
clerical tormentors and assassins. These abominable practises caused Duke
Sigmund and others to intercede and stop the proceedings (April 21). But
the persecutions were resumed on June 5, and were maintained until the
Jew Moses, aged eighty years, after terrible tortures and persistent denials,
likewise “confessed.” Toward the end of June (21-23) eight of the
wealthiest Jews, after receiving baptism, were put to death, some being
burned at the stake and the rest beheaded.
[35]
It is significant that a Jewish prisoner, already baptized into the Roman
Catholic religion, was the “witness” who condemned the accused.
It was neither the first nor the last example of Jewish treachery within the
ranks.
During the Passover in Judea of ~32 A.D. Jewish religious leadership
betrayed the people and convinced their Roman task-masters to put to death an
innocent and extremely popular Rabbi from Nazareth because he (He) threatened
their abusive control. [Matthew 27:20]
Hungarian Jewish billionaire George Soros is constantly demonized by
supposed “Right-wing” media like Fox News. Fox News was founded by
Australian “purveyor of pornography”
[36] Rupert Murdoch, a Knight of Malta
[37]
who has received the Order of St. Gregory personally from Pope Saint John Paul
II
[38],[iii]
. Yet it is little-known that Soros was a Nazi collaborator.
As a young man, in Budapest, George Soros was a courier for the Jewish
Council, the Nazi-established and Nazi-run organization that ran the
Jewish community. The Jewish Council was ultimately controlled by Adolf
Eichmann, the man known as the “architect of the Holocaust,” who was in
charge of the mass deportation of the Jews of Poland and Hungary to the
extermination camps. Eichmann arrived in Budapest in early 1944, to take
charge of the elimination of the Hungarian Jews. Before Eichmann left,
430,000 Hungarian Jews had been put to their death. In 1960, agents of
the Israeli Mossad kidnapped Adolf Eichmann from Argentina, and brought
him to Israel, to stand trial as a war criminal. During the trial, Eichmann
was kept in a glass cage. He was convicted, sentenced to death, and was
executed in 1962.
In his 1965 memoir of the wartime, Masquerade — Dancing Around
Death in Nazi-Occupied Hungary, George Soros’ father, Tivadar Soros,
devoted an entire chapter to the Jewish Council, and his son’s involvement.
“When systematic persecution of the Jews began,” Tivadar Soros wrote,
“it was carried out not by the Germans, nor by their Hungarian lackeys,
but — most astonishingly — by the Jews themselves. One of the first things
the Germans did was to form a so-called Jewish Council, consisting of the
leaders of the Jewish community. Council members were made personally
responsible for the implementation of the various German measures
relating to the Jewish population. As a reward, they, their families, and
those who worked for them were exempted, at least at the beginning, from
these restrictions... The Jewish Council carried out the German wishes far
more conscientiously than the Germans could themselves.”
Tivadar Soros described his son George’s role. “As Jews couldn’t go to
school any more and their teachers couldn’t teach, they were ordered to
report to council headquarters. The children were enlisted as couriers
under the command of their teachers. My younger son, George, also
became a courier. On the second day, he returned home at seven in the
evening.
“‘What did you do all day?’ ‘Mostly nothing. But this afternoon I was
given some notices to deliver to various addresses.’ ‘Did you read what
they said?’ ‘I even brought one home.’ He handed me a small slip of
paper, with a typewritten message [a summons]. ‘Do you know what this
means?’ I asked him. ‘I can guess,’ he replied, with great seriousness.
‘They’ll be interned.’” ~ LPAC
[39]
Apparently, the Jews who are empowered by Rome to be Vatican scapegoats
don’t even mind when the Papacy steals and traffics their children.
The opportunity came during the Holocaust — an outrage also engineered by
Rome.
The Catholic Intelligence Agency
The CIA (then the OSS) was founded by Catholic Wall Street lawyer, and
Knight of Malta,
447 William Donovan.
Donovan was specifically selected because his loyalties to Rome far
outweighed any scruples he had about honoring an allegiance to America,
her citizens or her Constitution.
Well before the conclusion of World War II in July of 1944, Eugenio
Pacelli (“Pope Pius XII”) awarded Donovan Knight Grand Cross by the
Order of St. Sylvester.
448
It certainly wasn’t because Pacelli was interested in conquering the Nazis
(at least, not quickly). He was personally responsible for their rise, having
been the Papal Nuncio (Vatican Ambassador) to Prussia from (1926-29)
and to Germany (1917-30). So much so, in fact, he has been named
“Hitler’s Pope”.
449 This, too, is subterfuge as Adolf Hitler was only a
pawn of the Papacy.
450 They even had a viciously anti-Semitic Jesuit
named Bernhardt Staempfle write Mein Kampf for Hitler.
451
...
Rome and her Special Forces, the Jesuits, were absolutely determined to
needlessly raise up antagonists in Germany and Russia to brutally punish
the birthplace of the Reformation and the world for receiving it. In the
process, her minions treasonously played both sides and made billions in
the process. ...
Inside Germany, Rome had double agents like “Lutheran” Martin
Bormann. Bormann was one of the most powerful men in the regime. He
was head of the Nazi Party Chancellery (the Parteikanzlei) and Adolf
Hitler’s private secretary who personally controlled the flow of information
and access to Hitler.
455
He was also an active participant in “Red Orchestra” (Die Rote Kapelle)
— a cell of traitors who gave German intelligence to the Soviet Union. It
was further evidence that Bormann worked for Rome. Between the Allies
and the Communists, the Allies were a far more lucrative recipient of
important intelligence. One could easily negotiate their way into a very
posh retirement by pulling the right strings (as many Nazis did). ...
Not working directly with the Allies forced Rome to intervene to provide for
Bormann’s “retirement” and he was put into the Vatican rat lines
disguised as a Jesuit priest and he ended up safely in [Jorge “Pope Francis”
Bergoglio’s] Argentina
456 where he died peacefully and unmolested.
His wife, Gerda, was carefully screened from harassment by any
intelligence agencies
cxxv and she appointed a Roman Catholic priest as
executor of her will. Bormann’s eldest son, Adolf, (named after his
godfather, Adolf Hitler) became a Jesuit and was given special deference
and consideration because of his father’s contribution to Rome.
457 ~ Secret
History
[40]
As a result of the Holocaust, desperate Jewish parents turned their children
over to Catholic institutions — hospitals, orphanages, etc. — as well as Elite
Catholic families, to give them a chance to survive the War.
They were never seen again.
A letter from Pope Pius XII to his representative in Paris on November 20,
1946 shows that he ordered Jewish babies baptized during the Holocaust
not to be returned to their parents.
...
Former Chief Rabbi Yisrael Meir Lau has said that the Holocaust-era Pope
Pius XII refused several requests by Chief Rabbi Isaac Herzog to meet with
him before and during the war to discuss how the Church could either help
save Jewish lives or locate Jewish orphans cared for by Catholic families.
On the other hand, Rabbi Lau said that the previous pontiff, Pope John
Paul II, told him in 1993 that he had refused to baptize a Jewish child
whose parents had died, “because the parents had specifically requested
that the child be brought up as a Jew.”
However, the same John Paul II did not respond to a request by Ukraine’s
Chief Rabbi Yaakov Dov Bleich to open church archives and reveal the
names of Jewish children who were raised as Catholics during World War
II. ~ Arutz Sheva
[41]
In 2005, the Times printed what was purported to be Pacelli’s letter.
Paris, October 23, 1946
Concerning Jewish children who were entrusted to Catholic institutions
and families during the German occupation and are now demanded by
Jewish institutions to be handed over to them, the Holy Congregation of the
Holy Office has made a decision that can be summarized in this way:
1) Avoid, as much as possible, responding in writing to Jewish authorities,
but rather do it orally.
2) Each time a response is necessary, it is necessary to say that the Church
must conduct investigations in order to study each case individually.
3) Children who have been baptized must not be entrusted to institutions
that would not be in a position to guarantee their Christian upbringing.
4) For children who no longer have their parents, given the fact that the
Church has responsibility for them, it is not acceptable for them to be
abandoned by the Church or entrusted to any persons who have no rights
over them, at least until they are in a position to choose themselves. This,
evidently, is for children who would not have been baptized.
5) If the children have been turned over by their parents, and if the parents
reclaim them now, providing that the children have not received baptism
they can be given back.
It is to be noted that this decision of the Holy Congregation of the Holy
Office has been approved by the Holy Father.
[42]
Media, in general, and the New York Times very specifically, is run by Jews
emplaced by the Vatican to both do Roman biding and insure Vatican
deniability.
The releasing of Pacelli’s letter was another Papal chess move; giving up a
pawn to gain a bishop.
#Surely edited, it allowed for damage control. As we’ve seen, little
consideration has been given by criminal clergy whether children
are “baptized” Catholic and much more their use in sacrifice and to
bring money.
#It gave the Times credibility as a “real paper”.
#It continued to foment racial divide by bringing the topic to light.
These suppositions were proven true by the Jewish professor in Roman
Catholic France, Catherine Poujol, who “examined” the issue...for the Vatican!
For almost a decade, Poujol has refused to talk to the press about her
discovery. Now, she explains the reasons behind her silence.
...
“I didn’t want to add fuel to the fire without properly investigating the
subject — and this was a very complex, lengthy process,” she told The
Times of Israel.
...
“The Church felt cornered, and at first adopted an inward-looking stance.
But soon it realized that denying the access to these postwar documents
would fuel the scandal even more.”
After examining countless sources and traveling throughout Europe, the
U.S. and Israel, Poujol came to the conclusion that even if this document
clearly outlines the Church’s intention of keeping baptized Jewish children
under its custody, it doesn’t cast blame on the entire Catholic Church.
“Many priests and bishops acted completely independently and didn’t
abide by the directive,” she says.
In 1944, two Jewish boys, Robert and Gerald Finally, were sent by their
parents to a Catholic nursery in Grenoble. After the parents were deported
and died at Auschwitz, their uncle and aunt, who were living in Israel,
attempted to get the children back.
In 1948, French Catholic nurse Antoinette Brun baptized the children
without the family’s permission and formally adopted them, omitting to tell
the judge about the existence of other relatives.
The affair reached the national spotlight when a police investigation found
that several nuns of the Notre Dame de Sion order and Basque priests had
arranged and executed the kidnapping and smuggling of the children in
Spain in February 1953. ...
“French public opinion was divided into two opposing camps, clericals
against anti-clericals, Zionists against anti-Zionists, and canon law against
Republican law,” she adds. ~ Times of Israel
[43]
“Two Jewish boys in 1944”?
Rome has stolen and trafficked tens of thousands of children but when it
suits her she will show her hand on two of them to give up the pawn of a
momentary “sin” and gain the bishop of stoking racial hatred toward Jews.
Saint Simon
Despite the controversy surrounding the question of who really murdered
two year-old Simon in ritual torture honoring castrated gods like Attis, he was
soon canonized as the Patron Saint of kidnap and torture victims.
A sickening number have fallen under his patronage ever since.
540 years later, children would again come into the spotlight in Trento when
Roman Catholic priest Don Gino Flaim told a local La7 News crew that he
“understands” pedophilia, that it needs to be “accepted” as any other sin.
Unfortunately there are children who seek affection because they don’t
receive it at home and I understand that some priests can give up.
...
I could accept pedophilia, but I’m not so sure about homosexuality.
[44]
La7 appeared to be following up on a story (which also surfaced at that time)
that the Venturini monastery in Trento had become a “rehabilitation resort” for
Rome’s deviant clergy. Apparently immune to prosecution by any secular
authority, there they could attain “a period of training, personal reflection and
enlightenment.”
[45]
But, surely, it must be the Jews.
Chapter 3
Slavers
1609: The Spanish governor of Asunción, Phillip III, brokers a deal with the
Jesuit Provincial of Paraguay to set up communes populated by natives at
strategic points along the Paraná river.
Spurred by the property-sharing philosophies of Thomas Aquinas, Jesuits
created the first communist villages across South America.
Known as Reduccións in Spanish or Reduções in Portuguese these
“Reductions” served several purposes:
#Maintain a strategic presence for Spain or Portugal without the
overt appearance of armed soldiers.
#“Convert” natives to become Catholic citizens of their imperial
conquerors.
#Enrich the elites of Spain, Portugal and Rome with slave labor that
cost little to maintain...unless you were a slave.
Containing undesirables from Indian reservations to Nazi concentration
camps to Soviet gulags to Franklin Roosevelt’s Japanese/American
internment, all have the common ancestor of Jesuit “reductions” in South
America.
...
Before the days of Avtomat Kalashnikov rifles and Schmeisser submachine
guns, large groups of prisoners were hard to handle with just a few Jesuit
priests. The Company needed to use brains over brawn. Later, they would
be able to appropriate the “brawn” of whole nations.
The appeal of wealth redistribution is that recipients can live a somewhat
easier life, though it is a utopia that has always disappointed.
In South America, “social justice” would become the cry for taking from
“the rich” and giving to “the poor”. What usually happens, however, is
that the super-rich exploit the poor to bleed the few real producers in the
Middle Class.
If this seems like the perfect weapon to be used in the Counter-Reformation,
it’s not by coincidence.
The phrase “social justice” was coined by the Jesuit theologian and mentor
to Pope Leo XIII, Father Luigi Taparelli D’Azeglio. ...
The utility of Communism was immediately seized upon by the Vatican. ...
The Jesuits took their experiences with the South American reducciones and
fed them to a German Jewish aristocrat who had never held a “proletariat”
working-class job in his life — Karl Heinrich Marx. ~ Illuminati
Unmasked
[46]
1618: Home Children Scandal — “vagrant” children rounded up in England
and sent to Canada, America, Australia as slave labor against their will. The
process was used by the Catholic Church, first behind “secular” and
“Protestant” fronts, then directly, for predation.
Because the governments of several nations were involved in the child slave
trade (and still are), “official histories” are whitewashes, at best.
Yet, even the Australian government must admit that “child migration” has
been “chequered”, to put it lightly.
Child migration had a long and chequered history surrounded with
controversy and marred by scandal. It was, actually, never a single policy
pursued continuously: rather it was a complex tangle of competing private
schemes, government initiatives, charismatic personalities, muddled
priorities and confused agendas. It was critically affected by the economic,
political and social pressures of particular times.
The first 100 children – “vagrants” – were despatched from the London
area to Virginia in the Americas in 1618, their passage arranged by the
City Fathers, while the last nine children were flown to Australia in 1967
under the auspices of Barnardo’s.
[iv]
It follows that the origins of child
migration were linked to Britain’s acquisition of an empire in North
America during the early seventeenth century. In the wild, untamed, thinly populated continent, there was an insatiable demand for men and women to
populate and exploit the new territories. The demand was so great, and the
perils of the sea journey and the initial pioneering so desperate, that those
whom it was convenient for England to send abroad – the convicted felons,
the parish poor and abandoned children were considered suitable and
many were despatched.
It was in January 1615 that the Privy Council issued a warrant to exile
certain convicted felons to the New England colonies and four years later
that these provisions were confirmed and extended by a further order from
the Council.
4 Child migration was commenced – in 1618 – in this context
as state officials cast around for other sources of labour in the colonies.
Later in that year, the Virginia Company requested a second consignment
of “vagrant” children (i.e. street kids) and the City Fathers cooperated in
procuring them – by having the constables arrest vagrant children and
place them in the Bridewell or gaol until ships were ready for their
departure.
5 However, many of the children did not wish to go and under
challenge it became clear that the first group had been despatched
illegally. The City made urgent representation to the Privy Council and on
31 January 1620 the Council gave its approval to despatch the
“recalcitrant” children...
[47]
In the schizophrenia of official whitewash, the Australian government first
claimed that “the consent of the children or their parents was not an issue” then
immediately follows with how the children were basically kidnapped.
The fact that Protestants were used as cover for the heinous practice is also
leaked in the admitted reaction of real American Puritans who outlawed and
attempted to police up the crimes and protect the children.
The consent of the children or their parents was not an issue, although it is
clear that many of the young people were runaways and abandoned
children, beyond the interest or control of surviving parents or guardians.
7
It was likely to follow that where there was a commercial need, i.e., the
desperate labour shortage in the colonies, then private enterprise was
likely to follow the clear, unambiguous lead taken by the state authorities.
There opened a ready cash market for any able-bodied man, woman or
child who could be persuaded, fooled, forced or “spirited” to the new
colonies. In a word “spiriting” was kidnapping, and for the next 150 years
child migration operated on three levels: some children were sent to the
North American or West Indian colonies by various Poor Law authorities
and government bodies who worked within the 1620 ordinance of the Privy
Council; a few were escorted by religious philanthropists; and the majority
were kidnapped or “spirited” from towns close to the ports for despatch to
and sale in the colonies. There the children’s labour was purchased by
planters and other farmers until the child reached majority, a procedure
given a thin veneer of legality by the signing of indentures.
8
The traffic in children being “spirited” to the Americas increased during
the civil wars of the 1640s, and the Puritan-dominated parliament on 9
May 1645 passed a strongly-worded ordinance against the practice.
9 Ships
were to be searched by justices of the peace where there was reason to
believe they held kidnapped children.
[48]
The reaction of the Protestants in America to the slave trade was again
attested to in the Australian government timeline —
1783: American War of Independence confirms the Declaration of
Independence of the Thirteen seaboard colonies in North America; end of
adult convict transportation to the American colonies.
[49]
The inversely-named “Sisters of Charity” handled many of the details of the
child sex slave trade
[50] and we will see more of them shortly.
The “Protestant” face of the slave trade was handled by Freemasonry. It is
an extremely convenient arrangement for Rome, delivered by the hands of the
Jesuits.
No less a source than high Luciferian Helena Blavatsky can be found on this.
As to the modern Knights Templar and those Masonic Lodges which now
claim a direct descent from the ancient Templars, their persecution by the
Church was a farce from the beginning. They have not, nor have they ever
had any secrets, dangerous to the Church. Quite the contrary; for we find
J. G. Findel saying that the Scottish degrees, or the Templar system, only
dates from 1735‐1740, and “following its Catholic tendency, took up its
chief residence in the Jesuit College of Clermont, in Paris, and hence was
called the Clermont system.”
Count Ramsay, a Jesuit, was the first to start the idea of the Templars being
joined to the Knights of Malta. Therefore, we read from his pen the
following: “Our forefathers (! ! !), the Crusaders, assembled in the Holy
Land from all Christendom, wished to unite in a fraternity embracing all
nations, that when bound together, heart and soul, for mutual improvement,
they might, in the course of time, represent one single intellectual people.”
This is why the Templars are made to join the St. John’s Knights, and the
latter got into the craft of Masonry known as St. John’s Masons.
[51]
“Scottish Rite” Freemasonry is especially useful to the Company and, as a
result, they keep their supposed “arch enemies” very close, indeed.
...both the Scottish Rite Supreme Council 33° of the Gran Loggia d’Italia
(GLDI, founded in 1910 after a schism with the Grande Oriente d’Italia) &
the Church of the Gesù – the mother church of the Jesuits – are located in
Piazza del Gesù! In fact the GLDI is known as the Piazza del Gesù
obedience. This body is recognised by the Scottish Rite’s U.S. Southern
Jurisdiction (“Mother of the World”) Supreme Council 33° in Washington,
D.C. ~ Troy Space, London
[52]
As Jesuit code, the name of the “Scottish Rite, United States, Southern
Jurisdiction” is often simply abbreviated “SJ”.
Although far from conclusive, it should be taken with suspicion that
“Protestant” child traffickers of the 19th century (a very active era for Jesuit
Freemasonry) like “Quaker” Annie Parlane MacPherson would hail from
Scotland.
However, when using dupes and shell organizations, one doesn’t get the
responsiveness necessary for full exploitation.
As the 19th century rolled into the 20th
, it was time for “the Church” to get
actively involved in the “Home Children” source of prey items.
Again, the Australian government lets the cat out of the bag —
Child trafficking was associated with the founding of the Knights of the
Southern Cross in Perth in 1922 as a Catholic counterpart to the
Freemason Lodge. One of the Knights’ objectives was increasing Catholic
migration to Western Australia, and more specifically child immigration.
In 1926, the Knights’ executive found ready support from Brother Paul
Keaney, the newly-appointed Director of the Clontarf orphanage near
Perth. Brother Keaney with financial support from the Knights, planned a
farm school at Tardun near Mullewa, west of Geraldton, to cater for the
farm training of older Australian boys in care and also for British child
migrants.
[53]
Then and now, orphanages (especially Catholic ones) were prime pens for
pedophiles.
Unfortunately, because the abuse of children is a massive, systemic gateway
to power (here-forward referred to as the “Pedocracy”), government documents
must be carefully parsed for disinformation and subterfuge.
Even so, the truth comes out.
Although the Australian “Home Children” report — another meaningless
“report” provided as subterfuge in lieu of pedophile prosecutions — dramatically
downplays the role of the Catholic Church, it can not avoid the crimes
committed by the order of the “Christian Brothers” (another sect as inversely
named as the “Society of Jesus”).
By this time, the Christian Brothers were managing child care for Catholic
boys and young men in four coordinated institutions, at Clontarf and
Castledare orphanages in the suburbs of Perth, at the farm school at
Tardun and on the new property at Bindoon, one hundred kilometres north
of Perth, a property recently donated to the Order by a wealthy benefactor.
[54]
It is noteworthy that the official “well-researched” government document
doesn’t give any detail about the “wealthy benefactor” who believed Catholic
child trafficking was important enough to bankroll.
Even more so is how co-operative the “Anglican” / “Protestant” government
of the United Kingdom was in the effort.
It seemed relatively easy to integrate child migrants from Britain within the
four orphanages according to their ages and talents. The British,
Commonwealth and Western Australian governments were willing to assist
with maintenance of the children.
In this situation, the Western Australian bishops arranged for Brother A
Conlon [full name, Patrick Aloysius Conlon] to proceed to London to
negotiate for ... child migrants with the British Catholic Rescue Societies in
1938. Conlon’s task took longer than he anticipated, but over 1938–39
some three groups of boys ... sailed for Western Australia to be educated
and trained within the Christian Brothers four orphanages, collectively
referred to as “the Scheme”.
[55]
Why name a “humanitarian relocation” effort for the “welfare” of young
boys as “the Scheme”?
Maybe it was the type of “education and training” the “Christian Brothers”
had in mind.
Finally, in 2016, yet another do-nothing “committee” put together another
impotent “report” on monsters who had been raping children for generations.
In Australia, 853 people have made a claim or substantiated complaint of
child sexual abuse against one or more Christian Brothers, with 75% of
victims under the age of 13 at the time, a royal commission has heard.
The royal commission into institutional responses to child sexual abuse has
turned its attention to the Christian Brothers as the third round of its
hearings into the diocese of Ballarat began on Monday. A religious
community within the Catholic church, the Christian Brothers primarily
worked in educational facilities for children.
In all, 281 individual members of the Christian Brothers in Australia have
been subject to one or more claims or substantiated complaints of child
sexual abuse, the commission heard... ~ The Guardian
[56]
Certainly, when you have a monster who targets pre-teens (it takes a special
kind of demon to rape kids who haven’t even hit puberty), you want to protect
his identity.
The commission’s data showed that the highest number of claims of child
sexual abuse were against a brother identified only as Brother CCK, who
had 46 complaints made against him about incidents in Victoria and
Tasmania. The average age of his victims was 11 years old and the abuse
occurred between 1963 and 1987, including in Ballarat.
[57]
Does the Catholic Church maintain the Devil’s Simulation?
Do pedophiles run the halls of power?
Both questions were just answered — crimes first reported over half a
century ago are only handled by a meaningless government commission and
even there the identity of a single Catholic predator priest is kept in confidence.
The shocking lawlessness in Australia is, sadly, the same everywhere.
Even when predator priests are identified, they are never brought to justice.
In fact, they are allowed to stay in the company of children and rape until they
die.
Another Brother, Stephen Farrell, a Christian Brother at St. Alpius Boys’
School in Ballarat East, had allegations of sexual abuse made against him
from six people, with the abuse allegedly occurring between 1971 and
1974. In 1997, Farrell was convicted of nine counts of indecent assault
against two boys aged nine and 10 at the school but his two-year prison
sentence was wholly suspended.
He was convicted of a further charge of indecent assault against a 10-year old boy, with his sentence suspended on appeal. The commission heard
another Brother, Gerald Leo Fitzgerald, was forced to retire from teaching
at St. Alpius Boys’ School, with a report saying he had “reached that stage
of life when, for some men, control of emotional impulses becomes
lessened”.
He was allowed to continue to live within the St. Patrick’s religious
community, the commission heard. A separate report stated he went into
the junior dormitory to “play with boys”. He died in 1987 and was never
charged.
[58]
In fact, when there’s no fear of justice (because law enforcement and
judiciaries are also owned by Rome and run by pedophiles), priests can be
downright bold about their abominations.
One, Brother Edward Dowlan, “made little attempt to conceal his
behaviour”, Barlow said, frequently placing his hands down boys’ pants
while they walked around. In a previous commission hearing about
Ballarat held last year, the commission heard from a witness that he was
raped by Dowlan.
[59]
Organizations other than the Freemasons have been very helpful to Rome in
trafficking children, such as the Knights of Malta.
This can be deduced by the role the tiny island nation played in the Home
Children Scandal.
While he was in Europe, Brother Conlon explored the possibilities of
bringing Maltese children to Western Australia, but negotiations broke
down at this stage. There were also tentative arrangements to bring a
party of girls to the Nazareth Sisters Home in Geraldton, WA...
During this 1946–47 trip to Europe, both Archbishop [Justin Daniel]
Simmonds and Brother Conlon visited Malta to explore the migration
possibilities: the Archbishop to explore the overall migration scene and
Conlon to arrange juvenile immigration.
[60]
Malta is no bigger than 300 square kilometers with a total (current)
population of 400 thousand. By comparison, the wide-open state of Texas is
twice as big and is 70 times more densely populated.
But who are we to argue with such wisdom as traveling to Malta to arrange
for the island to give up her children to the tender care of Rome?
The location of the Grandmaster’s Palace on the island in the city of Valletta was no coincidence. It was named after its founder, Grand Master of the
Knights of St. John, Jean de Valette in 1566 — a short time after the Protestant
Reformation.
The “capital” for “The Sovereign Military Hospitaller Order of Saint John of
Jerusalem of Rhodes and of Malta”, however, remains in Rome.
[61] The Order is
itself, a sovereign entity
[62] “free” of the insignificant laws of the nations in
which its insurgency operates. Despite ludicrous propaganda to the contrary
(such as the January 2017 “condom controversy”
[v]
) the KoM have never been
anything other than loyal foot soldiers of the Papacy since their founding in 1048
A.D.
The Knights of Malta remain a key player in the movement of children to
this day.
By another “coincidence”, at this writing, the Order is hosting an
“International Children’s Day conference” with emphasis on “assistance for
child victims of conflict”.
[63]
Six months prior to this, the grandiosely-named Grand Hospitaller
Dominique de La Rochefoucauld-Montbel addressed Ban Ki-moon and the
United Nations General Assembly in New York on the issue of children and the
“migration challenge” caused by incessant wars.
[64]
What de La Rochefoucauld-Montbel didn’t address is how many of those
wars were enabled, started, inflamed and profiteered from by Knights of Malta:
almost all of them.
No one illustrates this better than Erik Dean Prince, the founder of
“Blackwater” — the most notorious war profiteers perhaps of all time (for more,
see Chapter 27).
1758: The first Magdalene “asylum” for women is founded in “Anglican”
Whitechapel, England.
Preying upon the innocent in order to defile them, to make them suffer as a
show of willingness to enter into the Devil’s Simulation takes malice and
callousness.
Yet, humanity (as a whole) rejects such a system which is why the Devil’s
Simulation is only open to a very small number of monstrous sociopaths who are
able to rid themselves of the best of what it means to be human; compassion,
empathy, protectiveness towards the vulnerable, self-sacrifice and selfless love.
For Christians it is the shocking reality that Jesus Christ has been far more
victorious than we ever realized — particularly on the Cross.
He even conquered the Roman Empire.
Rome was an empire splintered and scattered when the armies of Marcus
Maxentius and Flavius Constantinus met in 312 A.D. Both were vying for
complete control of the most powerful nation ever seen before or since.
Just prior to the critical battle of Milvian Bridge it was reported that
Flavius Constantius — Constantine — had a miraculous intervention by
the Christian Messiah, Jesus.
According to Church historian Eusebius
2 — an adoring contemporary of
the future emperor — Constantine was threatened by the “black magic” of
his enemy, Maxentius, (and his rival also had an army twice the size of his).
Desperate for some way to counter it, Constantine compared the beliefs of
other great men he had known. One after another, the pantheon of pagan
gods had failed them. But the beliefs of one man stood out — his own
father (Emperor Constantius Chlorus
3
) who had adopted the Christian God
and commended the safety of the Empire to Him.
This seems like propaganda but Constantius Chlorus was more
benevolent to Christians then, say, Nero.
While imploring the Christian God, Constantine received an answer in a
vision, “In this Sign, conquer!”
The “Sign” was the lambarum; the intersection of the Greek letters chi (X)
and rho (P) as an acronym for Christ and Christians. ...
The historian Lactantius states
5
that Constantine ordered his men to place
the “Sign” upon their shields, and so they did.
At the conclusion of the battle, Maxentius had drowned in the Tiber and his
army was completely routed.
6
Constantine now ruled Rome ... [whose] Edict of Milan in 313 AD that
officially ended Christian persecution. ~ Secret History
[65]
Though many experts question the sincerity of Constantine’s conversion
even now, none can argue that he made the rituals and rites of the Luciferians
illegal and drove them underground.
Within a few years of the Edict of Milan he increased in his animosity
towards pagans and began raiding their shrines.
They never again had the power to return to the open debauchery of Sodom;
even Tiberius needed to retreat to an island for his outrages. This made the
Luciferians desperate as to how to carry on.
They would start by attacking and taking back the instrument that was their
downfall: the Roman Empire.
If Constantine ruled as a true Christian (there are few reasons to believe he
did not) he was still a Roman Emperor. This led him to the error of coalescing
ecclesiastical authority for Christianity in Rome. When he began arbitrating
doctrinal differences amongst Christian sects, it set the stage for Rome’s
transformation.
It would take almost 10 emperors hence but Theodosius I finished the job
with the Edict of Thessalonica in 380 A.D. In it he required all Romans to
become Christians and thus the Luciferians had their answer: syncretism.
They would put on the mantel of Christianity while conducting all of the
same ancient rituals they had always done.
Thus was born “Roman Catholicism”.
Outwardly, there was feigned love and compassion but inwardly they were
ravenous parasites who fed off the lives of others.
Such were the Magdalene “asylums”.
Billed as homes for single mothers and children in need of shelter and
compassion, they were Jesuit Communist slave labor camps, every bit as cruel
and barbaric as their Nazi, Stalinist or Maoist counterparts (and each of those
regimes have the same roots in Rome).
Perhaps most shocking of all, these institutions had the full and complete cooperation of their host nation’s governments; Australia, Canada, England,
Ireland, France, Spain, the United States and all of South America. Sometimes
they worked openly and in unison.
That was the case in Ireland. As a result, the atrocities that have been buried
elsewhere have come to the surface in that country where the government has
been forced to take responsibility (though it was the junior partner).
In 2012, Ireland’s The Journal ran just one story of the thousands that have
been kept out of the public eye —
The treatment of women incarcerated in Magdalene Laundries – and the
level of State involvement in these Church-run institutions – has been
highlighted yet again this month. There was disappointment among
survivors and relatives of those kept in the Laundries when it was
announced that a State committee’s final report into the matter would be
delayed until the end of the year.
To reiterate the urgency of revealing the inter-departmental findings, the
Justice for Magdalene advocacy group last week distributed some redacted
statements of women detailing their lives in such institutions. (The group
claims that there was State involvement in the operation of the Laundries
as places to send women considered to be “problem girls”, due to poverty
or pregnancy outside marriage for example.)
Samantha Long’s mother Margaret Bullen was placed in Gloucester Street
(now Sean McDermott Street) Laundry c.1967 and died 35 years later,
never having been released into society and her own home. Margaret died
of an illness known as Goodpasture Syndrome, a disease of the kidneys and
liver – one of the causes is exposure to industrial-strength chemicals such
as those used in the Laundries.
Samantha made a lengthy statement to the interdepartmental committee,
led by Senator Martin
McAleese, about her mother’s life. Margaret Bullen
had a tragic start in life: she was born in a mental institution in
Grangegorman, Dublin to a mother who already had six children,
Margaret being the youngest. Margaret was sent home to Kimmage to live
with her siblings and father, where she remained until she was three years
old. At that point, Margaret’s brother was sent to Artane industrial school
and Margaret and her sister closest to her in age sent to the notorious High
Park industrial school and Laundry in Drumcondra. That, as Samantha
says of her mother, “was the end of her and the outside world”.
[66]
Margaret suffered fits as a child which went ignored and untreated by the
nuns of the facility, ironically named the Sisters of Charity of Refuge. They are
now the Sisters of Our Lady of Charity; “Our Lady” being “the Queen of
Heaven”, Semiramis, Isis, Columbia, or Cybele. That is the “charity” that was
shown Margaret — that of Cybele, not Miriam, the mother of Yeshua of
Nazareth.
Margaret was deemed “mentally unfit” for education but fit for slave labor.
As a young teenager, uneducated and mentally impaired, she was preyed
upon under the supervision of the nuns and the sexual attacks left her
pregnant...twice. Each time, the nuns stole her baby and trafficked the child for
cash. [disgusting d.c]
The fact that this vast system was controlled from stem to stern by agents of
the Papacy made it well-suited for providing pedophiles with their prey.
Such was what happened to Mary Monaghan — ripped from her mother’s
arms at two years old by the Sisters of the Sacred Heart and sent to vicious
pedophile William O’Brien in California.
She was immediately set upon by the monster (imagine what it takes to
sexually assault a two year-old toddler).
“My mother was a fallen woman,” [Roman Catholic terminology for
pregnant, unwed teenager] says Ms. Monaghan, who now lives in
Massachusetts. “I really do not remember a lot [about the actual
moment].”
“But even though you’re so young, you still have feelings. You remember
being ripped away even if you don’t remember the physicalities of it.”
To the outside world, her new family appeared perfect for a lonely child
taken from her mother and transported more than 5,000 miles away to
California. ~ Daily Mail
[67]
Fitting the profile the nuns sought, Mary’s adoptive pedophile father was
rich, respected and Roman Catholic.
Mary’s new father, William, was a prosperous businessman and well respected in the local community...
“When I first got there, I would often be ill,” she says of her early years
with the family. “I would have all kinds of allergies and break out because
I was allergic to the food.”
But worse was to come. “My memories [of childhood] are terrible,” Ms.
Monaghan says, sadly. “I was physically punished for not being able to
eat.”
“If I did what a little child does and wet the bed, then I was literally put in
the toilet. Then the sexual abuse started and it just progressed.”
[68]
O’Brien was no run-of-the-mill monster accidentally hit upon by
incompetent Catholic nuns; he was plugged in to the Devil’s Simulation — well versed and trained in how to administer trauma-based mind control on an
innocent, vulnerable victim.
“I had to be kept in my little routine as it were, so I tried to break away. It
was all systematic. It was very serious paedophile thinking.”
With the O’Briens keeping up appearances in front of friends and
neighbours, the bewildered little girl found herself alone and with no one to
turn to.
“I could not perceive of any way of doing something [to alert the
authorities] and I had to protect myself. Because if I had said something
and it had come to light, then I probably would not have lived another
day.”
“And that is not an exaggeration. He had the world fooled.”
The abuse lasted throughout her childhood with Mary fleeing her abusive
family as soon as she was old enough.
[69]
Not even Mary, herself, understood that she had been trafficked for the very
purpose of ritual abuse. Bolstered by media, government and Vatican
disinformation, she naively believed what happened to her was
“mismanagement”.
Nothing could be further from the truth.
“I still have flashbacks sometimes and I still struggle with substance abuse
occasionally. And I have been diagnosed with post-traumatic stress
disorder.”
Although Ms. Monaghan did eventually find her birth mother, it wasn’t
until she was 52 that she was able to come to London to meet her.
“Well, that was quite a moment when we first met,” she smiles. “I went up
to her and I hugged her and she froze. She literally froze. So it came
through to me that I needed to tread lightly.”
Tragically, her mother’s shame at being an unwed parent followed her to
London and Ms. Monaghan says she was very reluctant to admit the truth
to her Irish family.
“It was very clear that I was to keep my mouth shut. That I was a secret.
That I was a long lost cousin. I did play along even though it was hard.
But some people did guess.”
The pair had just 10 years together, with Mary’s mother Theresa dying in
2010. “It’s just unfortunate that she had to take so much shame to her
grave,” she adds. “It just isn’t right.”
[70]
Margaret Bullen’s two daughters — Samantha and Etta — experienced
similar heartache even after all that had already been done to their mother.
They were wounds that continued on long after the initial crimes were
committed.
Margaret was only 42 at the time but looked much older. She was carrying
a handbag but it was completely empty, because she didn’t own anything
nor did she have any money. Samantha recalls:
And, she was just lovely, and she was asking extremely innocent
questions like, she, it was the first time she ever had coffee and it was
very exciting for her to have coffee and she hadn’t seen brown sugar
before either and obviously in the Gresham there was brown and
white sugar cubes on the table and it was all very fancy to her. And
she was just overjoyed to be there and absolutely wowed by
everything.
She looked, she looked like a pensioner. I couldn’t believe she was
forty-two, I kept looking, I kept looking into her face to find a forty two year old and I couldn’t, because she had the face of hard work,
that face that you see in so many women that have just had to work
too hard and have never had a rest and have never had anyone to take
care of them or tell them to put their feet up, and who have just, just
worked too hard. Because, as I said on the radio a few years ago, this
was slavery and I don’t use that term lightly and I’m not an emotive
person but slavery is a form of work for which you get no pay and you
can’t leave and these were the white slaves of Ireland and they were
never emancipated. And nobody stood up for them until now, until
you guys (Justice for Magdalenes) did.
[71]
All of Samantha’s efforts at redress of grievances have been directed towards
the government of Ireland while the Catholic Church keeps entirely out of the
spotlight.
Few media sources are to be found on the topic so again we return to The
Journal for another story; that of Kathleen Legg.
Kathleen was born out of wedlock under troubled circumstances. Her
mother turned her over to her grandmother to raise but her grandmother died
when she was 14. Not willing to take her back and believing she would get a
good education from the Sisters of Charity, Kathleen was delivered to St. Mary’s
Stanhope Street Training Centre in Dublin.
This was simply not the case.
[72]
Rather than getting an education, once she entered the convent and was
stripped naked and given a uniform, she wouldn’t see another classroom
for four years.
[73]
For the next four years I would scrub, polish and clean every inch of that
building, working long hours in the laundry. I had my name changed and I
was known as number 27. This was an institution, which generated
enormous amounts of wealth, and all the time I was there I had little to very
basic food. In fact it was dismal and how we survived I’ll never know. I
was constantly hungry and on the verge of starving.
The Nuns treated me and indeed others in there as slaves. They gave to the
world a false sense of what was being done. So much so that they even sent
out school reports saying how well I did in class and how great I was at
cooking, housewifery and other such subjects. I never attended a class. I
never even met the mother superior. I never saw a clock, book or
newspapers when I was there.
Every morning you would awake to the sound of a bell. You operated like a
robot and you did not dare question a nun. We bathed once a week and I
remember the lice from our hair used to float around the top of the water
so if you were one of the last to get washed it was horrific.
[74]
The slave labor of young girls was very lucrative for “the Church” as well as
the major corporate interests Rome was in bed with.
There was no privacy, no care, no love or support in there. The nuns
controlled your every movement and they hated it if you took ill, as this
meant you were holding up the work that had to be done. We did laundry
for all the big hotels, hospitals, companies and other individuals. It was
hard tenuous work, which involved heavy lifting.
I was told years later that due to the heavy lifting I did in there this
impeded me having my own children. The Nuns robbed me of my life and
the life I could have given to others.
[75]
There has been a government “investigation” but Kathleen’s experience will
not be addressed as it has been deemed that the facility at St. Mary’s, Stanhope
Street in Dublin, was not a “Magdalene Laundry” according to the official
definition.
[vi]
“There were great big heavy rollers. The sheets would be red hot. It
would be the work of an adult man. I was up at six in the morning and
every time the bell rang you went where you were told to go.”
“I didn’t know how old I was. There were no mirrors and birthdays were
never celebrated.”
She also described how the nuns systematically ensured the girls there did
not make friends.
“We didn’t speak to each other. We were too frightened,” she said. “In
the room we sang hymns all day long.”
[76]
Like any concentration camp, escape was impossible.
Others have spoken about trying to escape but being unable to scale the
high walls, often topped with glass.
[77]
With order names like “Charity” and “Mercy” women working for Rome
conducted barbarism not seen since the overt Roman occupation of the islands.
Mary Merritt, 83, who was “in the care” of the nuns for 14 years before
escaping, spoke out in September, 2014, about her ordeal.
She was born in 1931 to a single mother in a workhouse and went on to an
orphanage, run by an order of nuns called the Sisters of Mercy where, she
says, the children were made to work and were beaten if they refused.
Mary, who now lives in Tunbridge Wells, said that at the age of 11, she was
so hungry that she took apples from the convent orchard and as punishment
was sent to work in a Magdalene laundry at High Park in Dublin run by
another order, the Sisters of Our Lady of Charity.
“They told me that I would stay in the laundry until I learned to stop
stealing. Fourteen years they kept me there. You get less for murder these
days.” ~ Daily Mail
[78]
When Mary did manage to run away, she was treated with the same brutality
(perhaps worse) than when Roman occupiers wore breastplates and carried
swords.
She said: “The laundry was heavy, heavy work and the heat was terrible
and you didn’t break until 12 o’clock when you broke for your dinner, such
as it was – potatoes and cabbage and fish – and then after you went
straight back to the laundry again to work and you worked in the laundry
until at six o’clock.”
Most shocking of all, Mary claims that after running away she was raped
by a priest, but despite this terrible violation she was ignored by police and
then shamed by the nuns.
Mary said: “When the police took me back to the laundry, they didn’t
[address my complaint that] I had been raped but shaved my head, made
me apologise for running away and put me in the punishment cell.”
But when Mary became pregnant as a result of the rape and gave birth to a
daughter, in a stunning act of cruelty, the nuns took the baby against
Mary’s will and [sold] her away for adoption.[79]
Shocking collusion with government authorities who are sworn and paid to
protect the citizenry from such atrocities has been the unbelievable norm in
every country that Rome controls (which appears to be nearly all of them).
In fact, taxpayers, not the Vatican, gave Irish victims their payoff.
... in February 2013 that survivors received an apology from the Irish
government and have since received £50 million in compensation.
[80]
The outrageous irony was not noted by the Daily Mail.
While many more victims wait for justice, compensation or even recognition,
the Irish government astoundingly continues to hand the wheel over to the
Vatican for essential services.
At this writing, it has been announced that the very same “Sisters of Charity”
are to be given “sole ownership” of Ireland’s newest, taxpayer-funded, state
maternity hospital, “Saint Vincent’s”.
[81]
As anyone with qualms about how the nuns conduct themselves jumps
ship
[82]
, Ireland’s newborns continue to be placed into the hands of the charitable
sisters.
For Whom The Bell Tolls
In Spain, hundreds of thousands of babies were stolen from their parents and
trafficked by the Fascist government of Francisco Franco via the Catholic
Church.
Up to 300,000 Spanish babies were stolen from their parents and sold for
adoption over a period of five decades, a new investigation reveals.
The children were trafficked by a secret network of doctors, nurses, priests
and nuns in a widespread practice that began during General Franco’s
dictatorship and continued until the early Nineties. ...
Several mothers say they were told their first-born children had died
during or soon after they gave birth. ...
But the women, often young and unmarried, were told they could not see
the body of the infant or attend their burial.
In reality, the babies were sold...
Official documents were forged so the adoptive parents’ names were on the
infants’ birth certificates. ...
Journalist Katya Adler, who has investigated the scandal, says: “The
situation is incredibly sad for thousands of people.”
“There are men and women across Spain whose lives have been turned
upside-down by discovering the people they thought were their parents
actually bought them for cash. There are also many mothers who have
maintained for years that their babies did not die – and were labelled
‘hysterical’ – but are now discovering that their child has probably been
alive and brought up by somebody else all this time.”
Experts believe the cases may account for up to 15 per cent of the total
adoptions that took place in Spain between 1960 and 1989.
Generalísimo Francisco Franco,
Kutxa Foundation
It began as a system for taking children away from families deemed
politically dangerous to the regime of General Franco, which began in
1939. The system continued after the dictator’s death in 1975 as the
Catholic church continued to retain a powerful influence on public life,
particularly in social services. ~ Daily Mail
[83]
What made the scheme easy to accomplish was that the Catholic Church ran
schools, orphanages and hospitals, and still does (even in “Protestant” countries
like America).
In Fascist Spain, however, the power of the Catholic Church was as blatant
and all-encompassing as it is in Ireland.
On April 1, 1939, Generalísimo Francisco Franco, crusading leader of the
rebellious Nationalist forces, triumphantly declared the Spanish Civil War
over. The Catholic Church was the institution that most benefited from
Franco’s victory. Its hierarchy had blessed the Nationalist uprising as a
crusade and had justified the war to the world as an “armed plebiscite.”
Now it reaped the reward. Franco quickly abolished all those
Republican** measures that had undermined the Church’s spiritual and
social roles, and entrusted it with more power and privilege than it had
enjoyed since the 18th century.
For the Church, the privileges constituted a
spiritual “reconquista” complementing the
political “reconquista” enjoyed by Franco and
his Nationalists. What the political
“reconquista” meant was the return to
Castilian centralism and the elimination of
other ideologies. The “reconquista” for the
Church signified Catholic monopoly over the
life of all Spaniards, a vital privilege if society
was to be “re-Catholicised”. This “reCatholicisation” was not an easy undertaking
keeping in mind that, in supporting the
Nationalists during the War, the Church had
alienated a large percentage of the population.
...
For Cardinal Gomá, primate of Spain, the only way was to impose “divine
totalitarianism”, i.e. the imposition of Catholic values on all Spanish
society. Franco was only too glad to help.
The privileged status of the Church was granted immediately following the
Civil War. A little later —in June 1941— its rights were outlined in an
Agreement between the Vatican and the Franco government, and finally
formalised in a Concordat signed in August, 1953. Amongst the provisions
were:
1. recognition of Catholicism as the official religion of the country;
2. Mandatory religious instruction at all educational levels in
conformity with Catholic dogma;
3. Financial support of the church by the state (paying the salary of
priests and contributing to the (re)construction of church buildings);
4. Guaranteed representation in both press and radio.
~ Spain Then And Now
[84]
The fact that the government of Spain, in collusion with the Catholic Church,
were the institutions that kidnapped babies meant that it is impossible to account
for them all. Despite media white-washing, it is a foregone conclusion that
many of the children weren’t simply “sold” to good Catholics who wanted them,
they were trafficked, tortured and ritually slaughtered.
Proof is found in how Rome maintained these crimes against the Spanish
people long after Franco’s death.
Generalíssimo Francisco Franco was personally assisted by Father Josemaria
Escriva, the founder of Opus Dei.
[85]
It would not be the last time Opus Dei was the vehicle by which children
were trafficked, abused and murdered.
NEXT 85s
The Pedocracy Puts on a Lab Coat
notes p640 here
FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. As a journalist, I am making such material available in my efforts to advance understanding of artistic, cultural, historic, religious and political issues. I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Copyrighted material can be removed on the request of the owner.
No comments:
Post a Comment