Part 3 Eaters of Children The Pedocracy Exposed ...The Pedocracy Puts on a Lab Coat

Eaters of Children

The Pedocracy Exposed

By Johnny Cirucci

Chapter 4 

The Pedocracy Puts on a Lab Coat

1948: “Doctor” Alfred C. Kinsey — an unrepentant sexual deviant — publishes Sexual Behavior in the Human Male with the intent of using pseudo-science to legitimize sexual anarchy and give cover for the Pedocracy. 

He is more successful than he could possibly have imagined. 

If we understand the Pope as the titular head of the Pedocracy with the Jesuits running the Pentagon (pentagram) and “War Department” then Alfred C. Kinsey was their Minister of “Science”. 

This arrangement has actually been quite fruitful for Rome because Kinsey has been scrubbed of all ties to the Papacy. 

As a result, he is a favorite target of agents of the Vatican who seek to emphasize his debauchery in order to give cover for the Devil’s Simulation as the over-arching mechanism of power for all. 

The repeatedly-used stage prop for this propaganda is that Kinsey had a “very strict Methodist upbringing” in Hoboken, New Jersey and the unbearable repression caused him to “rebel”. 

The reality, however, is quite different. 

Kinsey was sickly and abnormal both mentally and emotionally from a young age. 

Under his picture in his high school year book he quoted Hamlet: “Man delights me not; no, nor woman either.” [86] 

But the truth was, man delighted him much. 

Friendly biographer and Georgetown Fellow[87] Dr. James H. Jones was given full access to the Kinsey archives. Jones contradicted the standard lines that Kinsey was “bisexual” or “asexual”. He stated with derision (betraying his own bias and why he was warm towards someone like Kinsey) that Kinsey was forced by “middle class morality” to keep his homosexuality “in the closet”. [88] 

Despite being frail and sickly, Kinsey became a fervent Boy Scout and relished the “outdoors”. 

Exactly why would come out later. 

However anyone wishing to research Kinsey has only two sources: fawning sycophants in pseudo-science or devout Roman Catholics. 

Critics run from pundits like Jesuit-trained (in both high school and college) Patrick Joseph Buchanan to Notre Dame Professor E. (Eugene) Michael Jones who eventually left Notre Dame because it was a Catholic college that wasn’t Catholic enough.

In fact, hearing an “expert” carefully avoid the avalanche of evidence against systemic pedophilia carried out by the Catholic Church to instead zero in on Kinsey is a clear indication that such an “expert” is an agent of Rome. 

An excellent example is “atheist” author Joseph Atwill. Atwill is an archetypical Jesuit operative who writes books such as Caesar’s Messiah: The Roman Conspiracy to Invent Jesus. Atwill is also, “oddly”, a foe of Kinsey. [89] 

It’s not quite so “odd” that he attacks both Kinsey and the legitimacy of Jesus Christ given that he was educated by the Jesuits at St. Mary’s Military Academy in Japan. [90] 

In his agency for Rome, Atwill has been invited on “alternative media” shows like that of “Vinny Eastwood” to brilliantly mix truth with lies: “Jesus Never Existed, Rome Never Fell”. [91] 

Tactics like these truly show whom the “Society of Jesus” actually serves. 

But for the hardest-hitting critiques of Kinsey, Rome chose a Jew: Judith Ann Reisman (née Gelernter [vii] ). 

Reisman has an extensive and impressive bio, including a Ph.D. in Communications from Case Western in 1980. She is currently a tenured Research Professor and the Director of the Child Protection Institute at the Liberty University School of Law. 

Liberty is billed as an “Evangelical Christian” University. 

As a result of her position as pedophile gate-keeper (giving phenomenal information on one specific criminal and then immediately stomping the breaks to go no further), she’s cleared to instruct at all the Roman-controlled institutions. 

An author and lecturer, Dr. Reisman has been a consultant to three U.S. Departments of Justice administrations; Education; and Health and Human Services. Dr. Reisman has consulted with members of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff... 

Special thanks to the Naval Aviation Foundation... 

I am indebted to the research staff at the Guggenheim Foundation, the National Research Council, the Rockefeller Archives, The American Law Institute, and the Eli Lilly Foundation for their professionalism and aid in providing me with my requested materials. [92] 

What is usually left out of her bios and resumés is her work as “a Vatican consultant on legal matters” [93] or her many trips to Rome for “seminars”. [94] 

This relationship is particularly disturbing given the unspeakable horrors that Catholic Church in general, and the Inquisition in specific, have visited upon the Jewish people. 

At minimum, her collaboration with the likes of arch anti-Semites such as E. Michael Jones [95] and Patrick J. Buchanan [96] are troubling. 

The impetus for her selection appears random and tragic enough — 

I was born Judith Ann Gelernter in 1935 in Newark, New Jersey. Mine was a large and thriving second-generation Jewish-American family... 

My mother, Ada, was of more common Goldberg stock. ... [viii] 

I lived at a wonderful time. My mother welcomed me home every day and my father supported anything I did. I felt safe with neighbors, uncles or cousins as was the custom of that time. I married, and the hedge of protection about my life was not breached until 1966, when my 10-year-old daughter, Jennie, was molested by a 13-year-old adored and trusted family friend. She told him to stop, but he persisted. He knew she would like it, he said, he knew from his father’s glossy magazines, the only “acceptable” pornography of the time. The boy left the country a few weeks later, after it came to light that my daughter was but one of several neighborhood children he had raped, including his own little brother. [97] 

It certainly is helpful when you have a child-raping child to be able to have the resources to “up and leave the country” before the heat gets turned on. 

From here Reisman’s selection becomes a little more apparent. 

Robert James “Bob” Keeshan (1927 – 2004) was beloved by millions of families, especially children. 

He enlisted in the United States Marine Corps Reserve in 1945 and so he did not serve in World War II. 

He began his Jesuit instruction at Fordham but transferred to the more general “Judeo-Christian tradition” at Hillsdale. 

This is a common practice for those who will be used by “the Church” yet are instructed to erase their fingerprints. 

Other “transfers” out of Jesuit tutelage include Donald Trump, his daughter Ivanka, Donald Rumsfeld and many more. 

When one adds “dropouts” from Jesuit seminary like California Governor Jerry Brown, Kennedy Assassination conspirator and CIA pilot David Ferry, [ix] “alternative media” talk show host Doug Hagmann, Godfather of European Unification and the Bilderberg Group Józef Retinger, Clinton hatchet-man and child-rapist John Podesta, amongst others, the tactic becomes clear. 

One can just imagine a cold, calm voice saying, “We’ve decided you’ll be of more use in service to us outside of this institution.” 

— And, like Bob Keeshan, they all have been! 

Bob was better known by his stage name: Captain Kangaroo. 

The Jesuit-trained Keeshan had a staff of Jews on the show like Producer Jim Hirschfeld who picked the young Jewish woman for a task that required minimum training and modest talent (not that Dr. Judith wasn’t thoroughly qualified) — writing and performing children’s songs. 

With this empowerment, Reisman had the financial comfort to get a Masters and a Doctorate in Communications. 

If one can get past Reisman’s betrayal of her own people and how she gives cover to the most heinous pedophiles in human history by fixating on just one key enabler, her work shows itself to be exemplary. 

Like his nemesis, Kinsey was selected and enabled very early on and his sexual perversions are what pointed him toward entomology. 

Kinsey reportedly secured a scholarship, 19 and money from an “elderly widow,” 20 to finance his final two years at Bowdoin College (1914-1916). According to Christenson, he devoted most of his time to zoology (16 credit hours the first year) and biology (four hours), while “sociology and psychology courses rounded out the year’s work.” 21 He was primarily interested in insects and animals. [98] 

He was already gaining skill in manipulation that would weaponize his deviancy. 

During his last year at Bowdoin he added “fifteen hours more of zoology” and began to collect wasps. His courses in psychology, especially those dealing with Pavlovian concepts of control through conditioned reflex, would serve him well in later years. 22 In Female, Kinsey cites Russian physiologist Ivan Petrovich Pavlov’s use of dogs as “subjects” 23 to detect the “conditioned reflex, a physiological reaction to environmental stimuli” that shaped the development of behaviorism. 24 [99] 

Not surprisingly, other “scientists” whose mission it was to sow a false reality were his heroes. 

Another major influence on Kinsey was Charles Darwin, the English naturalist who is credited with formulating the theory of evolution in such works as The Origin of Species (1859). 25 Kinsey was so impressed ... that, upon graduating magna cum laude from Bowdoin in 1916, he quoted him in his commencement address. 26 [100] 

He continued to prove himself of the same sociopath “stock” as other monsters hiding under lab coats, and do so via safe, “non-Catholic” [x] institutions. 

Following graduation, Kinsey continued his studies at Harvard’s Bussey Institution, which was a hotbed of Darwinism and the “New Biology” that led scientists to envision improving the human species through “eugenics.” Jones identifies Kinsey as one of the scholarly pre-World War II eugenicists who issued a “terrifying” call for the mass sterilization of “lower level” Americans and a breeding plan for superior classes. 27 ... 

Sir Thomas Huxley (1825-1895), the foremost proponent of Darwinism in England, was credited by Kinsey with crafting a scientific “declaration of independence.” 28 ... 

Kinsey would also play in the same elite eugenic league as Sir Thomas Huxley’s grandsons, Aldous and Julian. Sir Julian Huxley, a geneticist and first director-general of UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization) became acquainted with Kinsey’s work through Indiana University President Herman Wells. In 1932, Aldous Huxley wrote Brave New World, which became required reading in many American schools. [101] 

It is instructive to learn that Kinsey’s attraction to men and boys found an outlet in the Boys Scouts. 

Kinsey joined the Scouts when nearly an adult and was a YMCA “Youth Counselor” who lured boys into his circle with pornography. [italics suspended except in original] 

As “shy” as he was around women, Kinsey was much at home with young boys. He preferred their company in both outdoor and indoor settings. He joined the Boy Scouts at about age 17, and later as a married man continued to wear his Scout uniform, take boys on nature hikes and the like, and sleep alongside them in tents. The Boy Scout movement, which was founded in Great Britain in 1907, has helped to instill such character traits as honesty, courage, tenacity, cooperation, and devotion to God and country in tens of millions of boys worldwide. Additional millions of devoted men have served as leaders in the Boy Scouts of America (hereafter BSA), founded in 1910, providing young Scouts with positive role models and rewarding experiences. Sadly, however, Scouting has too often been exploited by deviates with less honorable objectives in mind. 

Claiming that Kinsey’s obsession with boys was entirely platonic, Pomeroy and Christenson insist that he led a largely sexless life. Evidence from Kinsey’s own writings, however, raised serious questions about his sexual orientation long before publication of Jones’ Alfred C. Kinsey confirmed his deviancy. Even in college he opted for the companionship of youths and boys. A fellow counselor describes Kinsey (then age 21) at the Newark YMCA: 

His tent, with his nature “library” of a dozen volumes, was a rendezvous for dozens of campers during the day and well into the night, even after taps had sounded and we were supposedly tucked in. ... The boys loved “Al” and couldn’t get enough of him. He had a merry eye, a wide smile and a hearty laugh. ... Always ready for the latest camp prank, he was just as ready to pitch in and help any kid in trouble... 

Unlike most of us, Kinsey had experience at several other camps also; was an active leader in Boy Scout work, often wore his Scout uniform. A camp history refers to war games in 1914… “under… Field Marshal Alfred Kinsey.” [While Kinsey was a student at Bowdoin] he was by far the greatest specialist in that group of young men… He was thoroughly enjoyed as a companion by everyone. 30 

Note that Pomeroy places nature “library” in quotation marks. People in the 1920’s would have understood this to mean that Kinsey collected nature (nudist) magazines, with drawings and photographs of nude youths and adults. 

Biographer James H. Jones confirms that Kinsey received nudist magazines at the family home-certainly an interest in conflict with his public “conservative” persona. 34 

Years later, Kinsey would write a curious letter to an old Scouting friend, perhaps one of the boys with whom he had shared his “nature library,” or to whom he devoted so much attention during his adolescent, college, postgraduate, and even married years. 35 Kinsey wrote, “We did have good times together, and you must understand from that Scout troop I began to learn some of the things that made it possible for me to do some of the research that we are now engaged in.” 36 Clearly, Kinsey was not referring to wasp collecting, but to the sexual research and experimentation that would eventually result in publication of Male. 

According to Pomeroy, “Kinsey began to leave Scouting and the sexually sterile world of his boyhood behind him when he graduated from high school.” 37 Not mentioned is Kinsey’s continuing close association with boys through his leadership activities, as above, during his college years at Bowdoin and in the Bethany Boys’ Club. According to Christenson: 

A major activity during his three years of postgraduate studies was the Bethany Boys’ Club at the local Bethany Methodist Episcopal Church. [There were] Saturday hikes and weekend overnight camping trips with Kinsey. 38 

Indeed, Kinsey so enjoyed the Scouting atmosphere that he continued to lead a summer camp program after he was married. He and his wife, Clara, once examined property with the thought of “establishing a boys’ camp of their own.” 39 [[102]] 

At that time, the Scout Handbook warned Scout Masters to dissuade curious boys from using masturbation to explore sex. Kinsey was able to get that warning removed. [103] 

Although Reisman paints a picture of the Boy Scouts as an institution of high standards targeted and perverted by deviants, she later acknowledges they were founded by someone of Kinsey’s persuasion. 

Kinsey’s interest in Scouting appears to have been similar to that of the movement’s founder, Sir Robert Baden-Powell. Like Baden-Powell, Kinsey married relatively late for his time (age 26) and seemed obsessed with nude males. These and other similarities to Baden-Powell, who is known to have collected “nature” photographs of young boys engaged in such activities as skinny-dipping, is both noteworthy and disturbing. [104] 

With a background like this, Kinsey was a shoo-in to begin teaching at Indiana University. 

Once there, he immediately began seducing his male students by exploiting and abusing their trust in order to satiate his perverse desires. 

Kinsey’s interest in camping with young boys continued after college. His professorship at Indiana University, as well as his field research in zoology, placed him in close contact with young male students. One was Ralph Voris, a friend whom Kinsey nicknamed “Mr. Man.” From as early as 1926 the two shared intimate correspondence. Sex historian and friendly Kinsey biographer Paul Robinson depicts Voris as Kinsey’s most intimate, though possibly latent, homosexual companion. ... 

Interviewed for the 1996 Yorkshire program, “Kinsey’s Paedophiles,” Jones described how, 

Two male students, Brayland and Coons, worked under Kinsey’s supervision in 1934/35. There were numerous episodes, nude and whatnot nude. [There is an explicit] photograph of Kinsey in the buff. On that trip [they engaged in] masturbation sessions, group masturbation. Both of the young men were trying to keep Kinsey at arm’s length. 

Asked what Brayland’s wife thought about it, Jones recalled: “I can tell you that she didn’t like Alfred Kinsey. [She responded] that they were just kids from Mississippi and that Alfred Kinsey hurt them.” And in his recent biography, Jones notes, 

Kinsey bathed with his students… striding about camp naked… [Confided one student] “You’d see him… going to the bathroom, and all that sort of thing… He’d just take a leak right there in front of us…” Professors simply did not engage in that sort of behavior with their graduate students. Yet Kinsey seemed totally oblivious to sexual taboos… as though he was determined to flaunt them… Kinsey had become a sexual rebel… manipulative and aggressive, a man who abused his professional authority and betrayed his trust as a teacher… Only… a compulsive man would have taken such risks. 47 [105]

However, these were times when the outing of such behavior brought consequences. Kinsey would need a “beard”; the appearance of normal life brought by a woman with little to no will of her own — someone who could be manipulated into full co-operation with any criminal act or behavior. 

Such was Clara Bracken McMillen. Kinsey brutalized and manipulated her from the beginning, training her to be his willing slave. 

Christenson describes how Alfred Kinsey used the couple’s honeymoon to “test” his wife’s courage and stamina. Though his bride was allegedly an outdoor girl, she had never climbed a mountain. Kinsey, who worked for years to overcome his sickly youth, had acquired mountain-climbing skills and commonly utilized them to establish his superiority over other men. Christenson writes, 

They climbed Mount Washington in a blizzard. Since Clara had never seen a mountain before, this was a real initiation into rugged climbing and all-weather camping. On the first stiff ascent Alfred selected a fire-warden’s trail, which was the shortest feasible route and, in Clara’s words, “straight up.” Alfred, in good trim, led the way, with his new bride lagging somewhat behind. 52 

As the honeymoon trek continued, Kinsey would forge ahead, then wait for his bride to catch up. Christenson notes: “It was clearly a test of her mettle, and she was equal to it.” 53 

Christenson does not ask why Dr. Kinsey did not opt for a traditional honeymoon of blissful togetherness. Instead of wine and roses, he brought pitted prunes and prepackaged trail foods. Instead of a cozy cottage with a warm fire, the future sex authority chose wind, rain, and frigid nights outdoors — conditions virtually guaranteed to preclude consummation of their marriage: “When necessary they built a lean-to for shelter from the wind and rain. The evening routine was to take off their boots and belts and to put on clean socks, plus all the extra clothing available, before climbing into their blankets.” 54 [106] 

They were married in 1921 and even Wikipedia notes that it was a ceremony avoided by Kinsey’s father. [107] 

Their children would all be exploited to varying degrees with some overcoming it (even dismissing it) better than others. 

Appearing on the 1996 BBC program “Reputations,” Kinsey’s two (by then elderly) daughters claimed that their father was a typical middle-class dad who was thoughtful in all things. Surviving son Bruce has repeatedly refused interviews with anyone writing about his father. [108] 

For Kinsey, “religion” was still a part of life but biographers and “critics” like Jewish Judith Reisman don’t give specifics. 

Christenson notes that “Alfred described in detail to Clara his church work with the Bethany Boys’ Club while he was at Harvard,” 50 which suggested to Clara that Kinsey was “too churchy” for her. 51 Pomeroy insists, to the contrary, that by age 26 Kinsey was a committed atheist. If so, he apparently hid that fact from Clara. ... 

A later incident, while Kinsey was mentoring his sexology disciples, further underscored [Reisman mislabels this Kinsey’s “atheism”]. He and Pomeroy were talking about theological matters. Pomeroy, puzzled by the impression “that Kinsey still entertained religious feelings,” interjected, “...Do you really believe in God?” Kinsey was irate and “surprised” ... 

Alfred and Clara were married on June 3, 1921. She gave birth to their first son, Donald, in mid-1922. A diabetic, he died at a young age. They had three other children: daughters Anne (1924) and Joan (1925), and son Bruce (1928). Little is known about the Kinsey children, other than that one took piano lessons, they were forbidden to receive confirmation despite attending church and that they eventually gave their sex histories to Pomeroy and their father. Jones reports that Kinsey led his family on nudist vacations to the Smoky Mountains, and that nudist magazines were perused in the home. Kinsey himself would often shave in the nude in the presence of the children. 56 We are not told at what age this practice ended, or if it ended. 

All of the young Kinseys attended church. “Both parents,” Pomeroy explains, “felt it was a cultural experience they should have.” It is conceivable that Dr. Kinsey attended primarily to enhance an aura of respectability. Years earlier, Jones reports, he had joined with leaders of the eugenics movement, whose devotees disdained the Judeo Christian belief system. But a churchgoing image would provide useful cover for his secret life and unorthodox research. [109]

What “church” (lower case) did the children attend? — 

The one where teenagers are “confirmed” (and, apparently, one which Dr. Reisman wishes to screen out of the Kinsey family experience): Roman Catholicism. 

The connection would be even more clear later in Kinsey’s life. 

One of Kinsey’s favorite lines to wow future sexual deviants in his classroom was to impress them with how the “Kinsey Institute’s” collection of pornography was second only to the Vatican’s. 

Jewish Dr. Judith “invalidates” this habit of Kinsey’s by quoting shameless anti-Semite E. Michael Jones. It seems Jones called the Vatican and the representative he spoke with denied the charge. [110] 

Case closed! 

Regardless, it is clear that both the Kinsey Institute and the Vatican prioritize pornography in their agendas. 

As proof of how much power the Vatican has, Kinsey’s work is intimately intertwined with the Godfather of porn: Hugh Hefner. 

Kinsey disciple Hugh Hefner launched the “other” revolutionary book, Playboy, in 1953, the same year that Kinsey’s Female volume was published. 

Hefner said that Kinsey was the researcher and that he was the “pamphleteer.” Hefner marketed Kinsey’s view of men as “Playboys,” and women and children as their sexual “Playmates.” [111] 

The connection is more clear with Playboy’s companion magazine, Penthouse, founded by Italian Roman Catholic media magnate Robert C. “Bob” Guccione. 

Interestingly, Guccione is not mentioned by Reisman. 

In 1979, Guccione spent nearly $20 million of his personal fortune to memorialize the Roman Emperor Caligula with a pornographic “epic” by the same name. He was surprisingly able to recruit big-named talent. The explicit sex movie starred Malcolm McDowell as Caligula and included Teresa Ann Savoy, Sir John Gielgud, Sir Peter O’Toole and Dame Helen Mirren. 

One can only guess how much their participation has guaranteed their continued success. At this writing, Hollywood.com has published the glitz article — 

50 Cent: “I’m in love with Helen Mirren” 

50 Cent has fallen for the charms of Dame Helen Mirren, insisting he finds it hard not to just stare at her whenever he’s in her company. 

The 69-year-old Oscar winner and the rapper, who is almost 30 years younger, met up on the red carpet at the 57th Monte Carlo TV Festival on Tuesday (20Jun17) in Monaco, and he is happy to admit he now has a major new crush. 

50 Cent posted a photo of the odd couple together on Instagram and added the caption: “70 is the new 50… Yeah, I think I love her, man. I’m trying not to stare at her." [112] 

If only “50 Cent” had been with Dame Helen 40 years ago, he could’ve played one of her Nubian consorts in Caligula’s Court. 

Although Judith Reisman stands dutiful guard before the Vatican’s porn vaults, she’s absolutely correct when she assails and assesses the damage (but not without, again, taking a swipe at a “Methodist minister” and his sleazy operation) — 

Pomeroy tells us that Kinsey had a “grand scheme,” 52 and that sexualized images were vital to his dream of moving American society from its traditional moral standard based on marriage, to one predicated on “free love.” Images intended to promote and legitimize deviant behaviors were critical to this moral and cultural conversion – what the IASHS calls the brain’s “restructuring.” 

The widespread availability of limitless varieties of pornographic magazines, videos, and computer graphics has institutionalized an assault on the fabric of our country that is, among other things, alienating an increasing number of men from real-life women, their wives, and their families. 53 As the institution of marriage has eroded, sexual violence toward women and children has escalated. [113] 

As to the Institute’s own pornography, admiring Kinsey biographer Jonathan Gathorne-Hardy admitted — 

The Kinsey Institute already moved Kinsey’s notorious sex-films to a secret location. And they have vowed to destroy painstakingly accumulated material (including a $40 million erotic art collection almost never seen) if the police arrive with warrants — as the Tate documentary suggests is desirable... I’m afraid a lot of material has probably already been destroyed... I think it’s inevitable that things will be got rid of. They’re under siege...Tate...marks Kinsey down as a fifth-columnist gay man — the very image of deceit and lies. [114] 

Kinsey’s homosexual student conquest [xi] , Ralph “Mr. Man” Voris, remained “intimate” with him even to the point of collecting “data” on Greek boy-love. 

Regarding “aesthetic admiration for the bodies of Greek youth,” Kinsey wrote to Voris about his collection of “gorgeous” male homosexual photographs 14 in a manner somewhat reminiscent of Scouting founder Sir Robert Baden Powell’s remarks about young male nudes: 15 

What I would have done without your earlier help, I do not know. ... I have whole albums of photographs of their friends, or from commercial sources-fine art to putrid. Some of the art model material is gorgeous. I want you to see it. 16 [115] 

Voris died just as their “research” was getting underway — supposedly of pneumonia — at only 38 years of age in 1940. 

The whitewash by Kinsey’s fellow deviant Wardell Baxter Pomeroy (regurgitated faithfully by The Atlantic) is a clinic in spin. 

After remarking on the unexceptional character of Kinsey’s professional and domestic life before 1938, Pomeroy continues, with an air of mystery and significance: “Yet there was one event that made these years far from ordinary for him. It was his friendship for a student, Ralph Voris ... Voris became the closest friend Kinsey ever had; their relationship probably meant more to him than any other.” Voris died of pneumonia in 1940, and Kinsey was heartbroken, especially as he had hoped to share the challenge of his new project with this younger friend. [116] 

With “friendship” actually meaning seduction by abuse of trust for sodomy, we already see how trustworthy “Kinsey Institute” conclusions are. 

Voris’ wife repeatedly begged Kinsey to visit his “younger friend” — the one who meant more to him than any other — but he was too busy with “sex research”. 

However, after Voris died, Kinsey did decide upon a visit. 

Alfred Kinsey’s close friend Ralph (“Mr. Man”) Voris died on May 9, 1940. Despite repeated requests by Voris’ wife for a bedside visit, Kinsey was too deeply involved in sex interviews to see him. He and Clara did, however, drive immediately to Springfield, Missouri, to comfort the widow and attend the funeral service. Then, 

Under the cover of darkness, he [Kinsey] entered Voris’ office and removed certain items, including copies and originals of their private correspondence. This accomplished, Kinsey and Clara returned to Bloomington, without staying for the interment two days later... 2 [117] 

In 1938, Kinsey managed to finagle a position teaching a marriage course. It was something he was completely unqualified to do but it was a position that allowed him the cover to begin a lifetime of sex crimes masked as “science”. 

Perhaps more than any other enabler was the fact that Kinsey again avoided service in war. While the flower of America’s youth was being shredded in World War II, Kinsey was a jackal amongst their wives and children. 

He quickly arranged for deferments for his entire sex staff [118] : a feat which betrays the support of powerful “friends”.

During this time, Kinsey was honing his skills as a predator and master manipulator; taking boys (Scouts, church youth groups and students) out on “camping trips” in which he insisted they all bathe daily and openly. [119] 

Kinsey was a textbook maladjusted homosexual deviant who secretly despised women including his own wife. This was apparent as he badgered and brutalized young females into openly discussing their most intimate sex lives for his “research”. He then berated them for what he perceived were “lies”, often fabricating what he thought he should’ve found had they told him what he wanted to hear. 

This was particularly outrageous for the 1940’s but Indiana University stood by their “scientist” then and still does today. 

Kinsey biographer James Jones openly admits that Kinsey’s “interviews” for sex histories were primarily used to arouse the “scientist” and not for any semblance of “research”. [120] 

Kinsey’s personal perversions consumed him with lust and he actively sought the most depraved acts possible until, eventually, nothing aroused him and, ironically, he became impotent. [121] 

What any of Kinsey’s admirers fail to admit is that “research” with a predetermined outcome isn’t “science”, it’s propaganda. 

It takes merely the slightest familiarization with Alfred Kinsey to understand that he was a sexual pervert on a mission to normalize deviancy yet this is never admitted. 

The conclusion is startling: each and every Kinsey peer in “science” approves of what Kinsey did and is satisfied to maintain the lies despite how it destroys their own credibility and offends real science. 

As a result of this agenda of pseudo-science, Kinsey needed to be assured of the co-operation of willing agents of disinformation. 

He did that with blackmail. 

He recruited only young people and then immediately demanded they give every detail of their previous sex lives which he meticulously chronicled and filed away. 

If they wished to advance, they were entirely reliant upon him. 

Kinsey’s principal assistants and coauthors of the Male volume — Wardell Pomeroy and Clyde Martin — were both young, inexperienced, and without doctorates or published academic work. Their lack of professional standing was unusual for such a controversial and high profile research study. For Kinsey, their loyalty would be reinforced by their lack of academic achievement. The team was entirely dependent on Kinsey for professional advancement. [122] 

Pomeroy described Kinsey’s bullying and manipulation in a very distinct way — 

That was Kinsey, the mother superior keeping us within the strict boundaries of his schedule, yet we did not often resent it. [123] 

But he didn’t stop there.

He then required them to be filmed in sexual activity of all kinds, done in a special sound-proof room provided him by Indiana University. 

Kinsey’s fixation on direct participation in, and observation of, sex acts led eventually to the construction of a soundproof laboratory at Indiana University’s Wiley Hall, where Kinsey, his staff, their wives, and invited guests could engage in all sorts of sexual antics. Some were documented on film. Kinsey believed that sexual experiments on humans should not differ measurably from those on “other animals.” Wrapped in the protective aura of “scientific research,” he sought [any depraved act possible] ... [124] 

Friendly Kinsey biographer James H. Jones told the BBC “there was more than a little masochism filmed at the institute.” Jones admitted Kinsey’s “personal interest” in making sado/masochistic pornos. [125]

For ultimate secrecy (and participation — which he often did, being the good scientist) Kinsey created a sex studio in the attic of his own home. [126] 

Most of the men on Kinsey’s staff were also his homosexual conquests. 

It is to be remembered that both Pomeroy and Martin were, reports Jones, Kinsey’s “lovers” from time to time. [127] 

If they were particularly pleasing to him, he allowed them to have sex with his wife. [xii] 

But only after he sodomized them first. 

Vincent Nowlis was the only heterosexual to join Kinsey and that didn’t last long. He was the exception: choosing to resign rather than participate in the “homosexual experience”. [128] 

The “public” might indeed have been “astounded,” since the “eminent scientists” who appeared in the Institute’s sex films included all of the carefully selected Kinsey team, including Kinsey, his wife, the wives of all or most of Kinsey’s coauthors, the timid Martin, the eager Pomeroy (who occasionally performed sexually with Kinsey and his wife), and a sexuallycoerced Dallenback. In a brazen example of sexual workplace harassment parading as “science,” Kinsey hired only those who would yield to his demands for “primary” sources. 20 His methodology included secrecy and deception, which he deemed necessary to accomplish his goals while hiding his techniques from the public. 

The histories were taken in soundproof facilities constructed, according to Jones, between 1942 and 1943 (approximately when Pomeroy joined the team), with additions in 1950. Christenson writes: 

The “lab” — as we always called it — presented a uniform, trim, antiseptic appearance… all well locked. At Wiley Hall where the Institute was housed on the ground floor, windows… were carefully fitted with strong metal grills. ... All doors to private offices had to be soundproofed and special locks were installed to insure privacy in discussion and interviewing. 21 ... 

The 1996 World Book Almanac and Book of Facts states that 40 decibels are comparable to “light traffic,” 70 decibels to “normal traffic, quiet train,” and 80 decibels to “rock music or a subway.” 23 

Kinsey’s “eighty decibels” would conceal quite a lot, including the shrieks and screams of the sadomasochistic acts performed by Samuel M. Steward, whom Kinsey labeled a “masochist.” Steward would later become a well known homosexual psychologist whose special interests included boy “hustlers” and tattooing. 24 [ [129] ] 

Here, again, Jewish Dr. Judith seems to have missed Samuel Morris Steward’s full resumé. 

Steward was a deviant who wrote homosexual eroticism under the names Phil Andros, Phil Sparrow[xiii] and others. 

It is amazing that a sexual pervert and “tattoo artist” like Steward should have such a long life (1909 – 1993), perhaps there were other factors involved. 

Most importantly, Samuel Morris Steward was a Roman Catholic, highly sought after by Catholic institutions of higher learning. 

He first taught at Archbishop John Carroll College in Montana but then received a promotion to Jesuit Loyola University in the “Windy City”, Chicago (a Jesuit stronghold where future Jesuit protégés like Barack Obama would be taught how to “community organize” [130] ). 

Seeking more “intimacy” with his students, Steward transferred again (but still to another Catholic college in Chicago), to DePaul. 

Clearly, Samuel Steward was the kind of man clergy wanted mentoring their students. 

It was here that Steward and Kinsey were brought together. [131] 

Steward was a “scientist”, too. 

Openly consorting with like-minded authors, teachers, students, artists and performers, pick-ups, and tricks, Steward kept detailed diaries and lists of all his sexual “conquests” and escapades in a box marked “Stud File.” The liaisons number into the thousands. He also took photographs and filmed his sexual orgies. Considering that he could have been arrested and blackmailed for any of these indiscretions, it’s remarkable that these documents survived. ... He was encouraged in this endeavor by his good friend and guide, Alfred Kinsey, who saw in Steward an invaluable entree into the homosexual demimonde (to which he was himself drawn) and a unique example of a sexual gourmand, for want of a better word, for whom quantity was more important than quality. ~ Huffington Post [132] 

Steward was brought to Kinsey to be mentored in perversion. 

It was a match made in Hell and Steward marked the connection with an interesting characterization of Kinsey that only Luciferians would understand — 

In spring of 1950, at Kinsey’s invitation, he was filmed engaging in BDSM sex with Mike Miksche, a New York-based erotic artist also known as Steve Masters. ... Kinsey was Steward’s most important mentor; he later described Kinsey ... as a god-like bringer of enlightenment to mankind, thus giving him the nickname, “Doctor Prometheus.” [3] ~ Wikipedia [133] 

This homosexual porn film was especially organized although what lead to it has received little-to-no scrutiny. 

Judith Reisman gives more detail — 

SEX-TORTURE EXPERIMENTS 

Writing in the November 13, 1980, issue of The Advocate, a homosexual monthly, Steward recalled the time he was flown to Indiana to be filmed in a sex sadism film produced and directed by Kinsey. Pomeroy described Steward as a “partner” in a “homosexual couple,” 25 but Steward wrote that he had never met the “partner” (Mike Miksche) until they were introduced in Kinsey’s garden. Shortly thereafter, the two prepared for the filming of an act of sexual sadism as Kinsey’s “scientists” watched and took notes. 

Pomeroy claims that the sadism filmed that day was merely part of the couple’s “normal” sex life. He recalls that Kinsey, while in New York observing men battering one another in sadistic rituals, “was particularly intrigued by the intercourse of a homosexual couple in which one of the partners had an orgasm,” so he invited Steward to his “lab” for a demonstration. 26 

Steward wrote that by the time he arrived on campus, Kinsey had gotten Miksche “half-drunk on gin.” The subsequent sadism film sequences were not quite what Steward had anticipated:

I was marked and marred, all muscles weakened… my jaws were so tired and unhinged… Mike slapped me hard and [unprintable]... During the sessions I was vaguely conscious of people dropping in now and then to observe, while Mrs. Kinsey, a true scientist to the end… sat by, and once in a while calmly changed the sheets upon the workbench. 27 

While Pomeroy suggests that the “partners” had a clear idea of who was in charge, operationally speaking Kinsey and Pomeroy were in charge of the entire scenario. The Kinsey team admittedly solicited victim and offender, paid for the service, and engaged in deception to bring it about. [134] 

Alfred Kinsey and Samuel Steward were true soulmates having walked (or been guided through?) the same path from Methodism to Roman Catholicism. 

Born into a Methodist household, Steward converted to Catholicism during his university years, but had long since abandoned the Catholic Church by the time he accepted his teaching position at Loyola. ~ Wikipedia [135] 

Interesting that Steward should “long-abandon” Catholicism but be selected to teach for the Jesuits and then transfer again to yet another Catholic college. 

Protestants in general and Methodists in specific would be targeted even further when Kinsey homosexual partner and subordinate “scientist” Wardell Pomeroy was sent from the “Institute” to further the work of another sexual deviant, Ted Mcllvenna. Mcllvenna was masquerading as a Methodist (in this case, a “minister”, to boot), in the Jesuit stronghold of San Francisco. [xiv] 

Dr. Reisman is careful to expunge what “church” Kinsey kept his children from being “Confirmed” in (but specifically sent them to for training), or how Kinsey’s connection with pornography “Professor” Samuel Steward was arranged on the campus of Catholic DePaul University but she had no problem calling Ted Mcllvenna, a “Methodist minister”. 

After leaving Bloomington, Wardell Pomeroy became Academic Dean of the Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Sexuality in San Francisco alongside the Rev. Ted Mcllvenna, a Methodist minister. 

Like the Kinsey Institute, the IASHS filmed sexual acts among staff members, including scenes of these sex professionals engaged in graphic homosexual and heterosexual orgies seen in Meditations, an IASHS byproduct. The IASHS sold its child pornography to Hustler magazine for widespread publication. [136] 

If we were to contrast whether the Vatican truly has the world’s greatest collection of pornography or Ted Mcllvenna should be honestly labeled a “Methodist minister” without qualification, there’s a good chance the Methodists would be able to make the finer point. 

In his position as a trusted Catholic sexual deviant, “professor” and “author”, special arrangements were made [137] to have Steward meet and promote two infamous Jewish lesbians residing in Catholic Paris; Gertrude Stein and Alice Toklas. 

With surreal obedience, like Ygor to Dr. Frankenstein, Kinsey’s wife Clara submitted to any and all sexual perversions foisted upon her by “guests” and “researchers” alike. When not a participant, she would bring milk and cookies to the porn studio in between sets and replace the sheets soiled by semen, urine and excrement. [138] 

Kinsey biographer James Jones characterized this as “befitted the wife of the high priest of sexual liberation.” [139] 

“High priest”, indeed. However few have been as hopelessly enslaved as Alfred Charles Kinsey. 

As Kinsey continued to collect “sex histories”, he became a junior J. Edgar Hoover — carefully assimilating dirt on anyone he could, dragging them into the Devil’s Simulation. 

Kinsey’s aggressive, intrusive, and arguably illegal conduct was protected by Indiana University’s public relations apparatus. We now know that some of the women and children in publicity photographs may have paid a high price to maintain the carefully honed Kinsey image. In October 1997, syndicated columnist Mona Charen, commenting on James Jones’ biography, noted that “according to one wife of another employee, there was ‘sickening pressure’ to agree to have sex on film.” 78 

Many officials and scholars covered up Kinsey’s highly improper activities during his lifetime, and continue to do so at the Kinsey Institute and Indiana University today. Pomeroy adds some perspective to what was foisted onto the public and misrepresented as an objective scientific quest for human betterment: 

I think he liked secrets, that their possession gave him a sense of power. And there was no question that the histories did give him unique potential power. On the Indiana campus alone, there were at least twenty professors with homosexual histories unknown to anyone else, not to mention the numerous extramarital experiences recorded. ... With his intimate knowledge of the sexual lives of important people, Kinsey could have figuratively blown up the United States socially and politically. Perhaps he liked to feel sometimes that he was putting something over on the world. 79 [Emphasis added.] [140] 

Perhaps a better description would be “Jesuit Confessor”. It’s one Kinsey made himself. 

Kinsey once claimed that he and his team had earned the rights of “a priest...” 63 to keep confidential the information provided by rapists, murderers, child-molesters, and pedophile murderers. [141] 

Kinsey took particular pleasure in terrorizing children in the guise of “science” such as showing explicit films of animal copulation — particularly violent or graphic ones like porcupines. 

Note the expressions of Kinsey and his wife Clara (second from the right). 

Keep all this in mind whenever Alfred Kinsey is mentioned with hallowed reverence as an esteemed “scientist”. 

With a totalitarian iron fist no different than Nazis or Communists, Kinsey pushed for the “right” to commit any heinous sex crime on man, woman, child or beast and mask it as “science”. 

Sadly, even his detractors allow this subterfuge. 

Kinsey often expressed an elitist right to unlimited, uncontrolled “scientific research” into everyone’s sexuality, including that of children from birth. It should hardly surprise us, then, that in the chapter on child sexuality in the Male volume he writes wistfully of the great things that science might accomplish with absolute freedom to conduct human experiments: “Erotic arousal of children could be subjected to precise instrumental measurement if objectivity among scientists and public respect for scientific research allowed such laboratory investigation.” 84 This noxious attitude caused Ashley Montagu to accuse Kinsey of “scientomania:” 

The analyst must first and foremost be human, must be responsive to the emotions which motivate human beings. Kinsey doesn’t appear to be very interested in emotions. ... 85 [[142]] 

This is, at best, a gross misunderstanding of what “science” is and, at worst, a purposeful deception. 

Nonsensical words like “scientomania” or “scientism” spin pseudo-science as “pure” but misguided when, in reality, it is neither. 

The foundation of science is the Scientific Method: 

• Make an observation. 

• Develop an hypothesis. 

• Conduct experiments in a sterile environment (isolating known variables) to replicate the observation, thereby proving the hypothesis. 

• Present to peers of equal or greater reliability in this method who can prove or disprove using the same steps (peer review). 

Many would be shocked to learn just how much pseudo-science is taught as real science in every school with neither the requirement to obey their own disciplines nor the acceptance of cross-examination or dissent of any kind. 

Along with Kinsey’s “sex science” are the frauds of evolution, paleontology and astronomy. Their suppositions are neither observable, testable nor repeatable yet they are commanded to be taught without exception or criticism. 

When laymen make observations that contradict the “experts” they are ridiculed or targeted for insider jargon they aren’t meant to make sense of. 

For instance, an unbiased observation tells us the sun and moon are roughly the same size and relatively close to us yet the “experts” say it’s merely an optical illusion: the sun is 400x bigger than the moon and, “coincidentally” 400x further from us. 

“Experts” like the National Aeronautics and Space Administration tell us that — 

• The Earth is spinning at 1,000 mph (breaking the 767 mph sound barrier). 

• The Earth revolves around the sun at 67,000 mph. 

• The solar system moves through the Milky Way at 500,000 mph. 

• The Milky Way moves through the universe at 670,000,000 mph. 

Yet the North Star remains absolutely fixed. 

Again, we’re told this is an “optical illusion”. 

The North Star is so far away, it only seems fixed. 

The keepers of the Devil’s Simulation own our very reality and our most trusted institutions are our most vicious enemies. 

Doctor of Communications Judith Reisman admits that big money like the Rockefeller Foundation hands weaponized tactics to government agencies like the CIA on how to manipulate public opinion with the goal to get innocent citizens to approve that which would ultimately cause great harm to themselves and their children. [143] 

As a key player in this deception — the complete destruction of traditional, Christian sexual morays and norms — “Dr.” Alfred Kinsey’s “research” had been based on the experiences of deviants, prisoners, homosexuals in bars and baths, and child molesters. [144] 

For his database, Kinsey classified more than 1,400 criminals and sex offenders as “normal,” 4 on grounds that such miscreants are essentially the same as normal men. ... 

Kinsey associate Paul Gebhard explained that even the prison sample was heavily weighted toward sexual disorder, since the Kinsey team specifically sought the worst sex offenders... [145] 

Gebhard later admitted to Yorkshire Television (for their 1998 BBC documentary Secret History: Kinsey’s Paedophiles) that when they went to prisons, they told each administration, “‘Give us the list of everyone who is up on a pedophilia charge’, and we’d go after them.” 

Even more astoundingly, Gebhard outed the existence of the Devil’s Simulation child sex slave network: “There was also a pedophile organization, in this country. They co-operated with us. Some of them, of course, were not incarcerated.” [146] 

Even after picking the most outrageous subjects, even after coercing them into explicit detail and encouraging them to be as wild and perverse as possible, the Kinsey team still didn’t get enough of the “results” they were looking for so they often “embellished” the accounts. 

Kinsey’s figure of 10 percent homosexuality, for example, mirrors what is called the statistical “fudge factor.” It can also be applied to his data on adultery, sodomy, etc. If a subject stubbornly refuses to admit committing acts recited by the interviewer, the latter simply speculates about what really happened. Among scientists, such manipulation is euphemistically termed “massaging the data.” [147] 

Yet, today, 70 years after the publication of Sexual Behavior in the Human Male, believing that 1 person in 10 is homosexual is as accepted as the spinning of the Earth or the Age of the Dinosaurs. 

Because they receive, use, and even facilitate themselves, “data” derived from criminal acts, the Kinsey staff (then and now) lives in an alternate reality that allows them to validate any aberrant behavior as “normal”. 

...it is apparent that Kinsey’s peculiar definitions of such terms as “college,” “married,” “rape,” “contacts,” and “partner” were precisely designed to bolster his team’s bizarre views of rape, crime, marriage, and child molestation. [148] 

Their enablers in law enforcement, justice and government see that they have no need of leaving this alternate reality. 

The Pedophiles of Pseudo-Science 

First and foremost, Alfred Kinsey, his subordinates and all they employed were pedophiles.

In this, they were (and are) true members of the Devil’s Simulation. 

In 1965, the “Kinsey Institute” published Sex Offenders: An Analysis of Types. 

It was a one thousand page subterfuge whose biggest deception was to paint the abuse of the innocent in grades. 

It was immediately brought in as definitive text for cops, judges, lawyers, doctors and teachers who were all taught that, if a child walks away from abuse without a swollen face and internal bleeding, it’s much less a crime.

Reality is just the opposite. The latent harm done to the rape of children may not manifest for decades. It can run the gamut from mood-swings like depression or inexplicable rage to schizophrenia. It can include the inability to normally interact with others from basic office co-workers to friends, family, spouses or children. 

Almost every time, child abuse leads the victim to harmful addictions and often ends in suicide. 

One of the “trusted Institute researchers” for Sex Offenders was Glenn Ramsey, a Peoria school teacher — himself a sex offender having “interviewed” 350 “sexually aberrant” boys. He was subsequently getting fired for “improprieties”. Even here, Ramsey escaped being arrested and prosecuted. 

Judith Reisman noted — 

Nevertheless, Kinsey defended Ramsey vociferously, and obtained Rockefeller Foundation money to pay his legal fees. [149] 

She then quoted Kinsey out of context as being deathly afraid of “Catholics” because they harassed his “researchers”. 

The Rockefeller family and Foundation is another “safe” target, seemingly devoid of connections to the Catholic Church but the strings are attached if one takes just a little time to look for them. 

For instance, one of the Presidents of the Rockefeller Foundation was Father Theodore Martin Hesburgh (1917 – 2015) — one of the most powerful Roman Catholic priests in America. 

Hesburgh was also the President of Notre Dame for 35 years (just a few hours north of Indiana University). 

Father Hesburgh was an invisible hand in every Presidential administration from Eisenhower to Obama and he served openly as a United States Government representative in a variety of posts such as the “National Science Board” or the Civil Rights Committee as well as the Civil Rights Commission and the President’s Blue Ribbon Immigration Reform Commission. 

Each position promoted a treasonous agenda of lies and deceit. 

Father Hesburgh was a VIP guest of the United States Navy and joined them in a supposed secret expedition to the South Pole — except that such a journey remains impossible both then and now. 

“Immigration Reform” was and still is code for the Catholic Church’s agenda to endlessly flood the United States with Roman Catholic illegal aliens from the south, trained by countless Jesuit institutions to demand socialism and communism from their host nation. Open borders means aliens go through no assimilation process and they are used to accent the “clash of civilizations” causing chaos and anger wherever they accumulate. [sound familiar folks here in 2022 America? d.c ]

Even the Catholic Church’s involvement in “civil rights” has a poisonous end-state. 

On the surface, “civil rights” seems a praiseworthy endeavor but harmonious reconciliation was not on the agenda for Hesburgh or any of the thousands of Catholic priests and nuns who helped fan the flames of racial unrest, especially in the 1960’s. 

It was all part of the “Divide and Conquer” technique still in use today. 

As a result of Theodore Hesburgh’s power in the American government he was honored in a way unique to Rome’s authority over the United States military — Father Ted was given a “ride” in the Air Force’s most secret platform in his day, the SR-71 Blackbird. 

Underneath the façade of a scholarly college president, Hesburgh was just as much the deviant as Kinsey which is why he fit perfectly at the Rockefeller Foundation, bankrolling Kinsey’s work. From abortion to “sex education”, Hesburgh outraged conservative Catholics with his politics. [150] He even promoted SIECUS, the “Sex Information and Education Council of the United States” — a radical organization that teaches complete depravity to the youngest of children captive in both public and private schools. 

Judith Reisman notes — 

In 1964, the Sex Information and Education Council of the United States (SIECUS) was launched at the Kinsey Institute. Its objective was to teach Kinseyan ideology as sex education in our schools. 

SIECUS (which now calls itself the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States) imprinted the new Kinsey variant standard on almost all sex education curricula. Its early leader, Dr. Mary Calderone (past medical director of Planned Parenthood) was the direct link between Kinsey’s university-based research, Planned Parenthood’s grassroots outreach, and SIECUS. 

SIECUS was a “Resource Center [operating] Specialized Programs to Distribute Information about Human sexuality [through] learned journals, research studies, training materials for health professionals and sample classroom curricula.” 111 

As SIECUS is regularly funded by the State, questions need to be asked about the January 1979 Annual Playboy which announced that “Playboy Foundation provided the first of several major grants to The Sex Information and Education Council of the United States to support its nationwide educational programs.” 

As Christie Hefner added, Playboy also provided the original seed money for SIECUS: 

Through the Playboy Foundation, Hefner put his money where his mouth was. It made the initial grant to establish an Office of Research Services of the Sex Information and Education Council of the U.S. (SIECUS) in the late 60s. [151] 

However, Roman Catholic priests like Hesburgh aren’t shown by Kinsey critics in their role behind the scenes, Jews are. Again, eager to betray her own people to serve the Authors of the Inquisition, Judith Reisman connects the dots from SIECUS to eugenics and Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger through Kinsey’s propaganda of sexual perversion in patsy Jews like David Loth and Morris Ernst. 

When Kinsey published Sexual Behavior in the Human Male, “historians” like Loth and “jurists” like Morris simultaneously applied it to their fields. 

The fourth book published in tandem with Kinsey’s Report was American Sexual Behavior and the Kinsey Report. This very important contribution to the growing “free love” legal debate was co-authored by ACLU attorney, Morris L. Ernst, and historian David Loth. The book’s dedication was to the accommodating Kinsey team who “enriched the market-place of thought.” 28 Ernst advocated legalization of adultery, obscenity, and abortion throughout his career, as well as Kinsey’s full panoply of sex law changes: 

Let me mention a few items on which law must say thank you [to Kinsey]. Our laws have attempted to abolish all sexual outlets, except marital intercourse, … [including] sodomy [and] seduction… Forty four states have laws against adultery. … Yet the Kinsey report may well… show that one third of all husbands [commit adultery] …Those who are concerned with juvenile delinquency, treatment of homosexuals, and the frightening attitudes of our penal institutions will have a glimmer of what the Kinsey report will do to the stream of law. 29 

Ernst was influential. He served as a “personal representative for President Roosevelt during World War II.” 30 Moreover, he was well credentialed as a legal radical for serving as a founding member of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). 31 Ernst was also the attorney for Kinsey, Margaret Sanger, the Kinsey Institute, the Sex Information and Education Council of the United States (SIECUS), and Planned Parenthood of America. Ernst had close ties to influential and progressive Supreme Court Justices Louis Brandeis, [William Joseph] Brennan, [Felix] Frankfurter and Judge [Billings] Learned Hand, 32 among others. Through the considerable efforts of Ernst, the Kinsey study would have special salience in the courtroom as its findings were plied there. In 1945, Ernst declared, “we had fun educating juries and judges” with their new “scientific” sex information... [152] 

The United States Supreme Court is another excellent case study in Roman Catholic control. 

From its inception, the Court was never intended to wield the tyrannical, autocratic power it does. That power was fabricated by Chief Justice John Marshall through his decision in Marbury v. Madison (1803). 

Thomas Jefferson had just won the presidency from John Adams. Adams, before leaving office, appointed William Marbury as Justice of the Peace in the District of Columbia. President Jefferson ordered his Secretary of State, James Madison, to withhold the appointment and Marbury brought suit. 

Part of the decision of Marbury v. Madison came down to “who had the final authority” given that the Judiciary Act of 1789 appeared to give powers not found in Article III of the Constitution. Although Marshall’s overall decision was not to expand the powers of the Central Government, he crowned the Supreme Court as the ultimate arbiter in the question of constitutionality. This unprecedented power is today known as “Judicial Review”. 

It has been the root of treasonous tyranny throughout American history ever since, where as few as 5 Supreme Court Justices can subvert the will  of the entire American populace... ~ Illuminati Unmasked [153] 

If Justices are sick, absent or recused from a decision, less than five individuals unaccountable to the American citizenry can dictate “law” to them. 

Some of the most heinous agendas have been accomplished in just this fashion from the “right” to murder the unborn to the safeguarding of pornography as “free speech”. 

While America was vigilant, Rome had to rely upon Freemasonic faux Protestants, committed Communist Jews and an occasional overt Catholic serving on the Court. 

As that vigilance waned, by 2016 the Vatican was confident enough to openly own the Supreme Court with a solid majority of six Roman Catholics flanked by three token Leftist Jews. 

On February 13 th , 2016, one of those Roman Catholic Justices — Antonin Scalia — was reported dead at the secluded Cibolo Creek, Texas Ranch of wealthy investment banker John Poindexter. The official story was that, after “quail hunting” the day before, the 79 year-old “died in his sleep”. [154] 

Scalia was immediately attended to by his doctor, Rear Admiral Brian P. Monahan. Monahan is also the Attending Physician of the United States Congress. He, too, is a Roman Catholic who was trained at not one, but two Jesuit institutions; Fairfield and Georgetown. [155] 

However, suspicions immediately arose when the Cibolo Ranch and Scalia were implicated in ritual child sex abuse. [156] 

The alternative media web site Veterans Today ran this byline without explaining it — 

Worst person in the world found dead in Texas “rent boy ranch,” playground for Mike Jagger and Charlie Sheen. [157] 

Perhaps it remained unexplained because Veterans Today and Senior Editor Gordon Duff are vicious anti-Semites (which is why they’ve been seeded into alternative media on behalf of Rome). 

More specifically, speaker, activist, blogger and author David Shurter claimed that, as a victim of ritual child sex abuse, Scalia was one of his rapists. [158] 

The use of secluded ranches had been described as a modus operandi of the Pedocracy 35 years earlier by victim whistleblower Paul Bonacci. [159] 

Scalia has been named as a member of the super-secret, ultra-orthodox Roman Catholic cult of Opus Dei. [160],[161] Several Opus Dei inductees have been implicated in ritual child sex abuse, torture and murder. The juxtaposition of extreme Roman piety with such an ultimate evil is telling. 

Did something go wrong at the “rent-boy [xv] ranch”? Did the debauchery do in the debilitated devil-worshipper? Perhaps one of the seemingly defenseless victims suddenly turned upon his abuser in uncontrollable, pent-up rage. 

More on Opus Dei and ritual child abuse in Chapter 30. 

As we try to regain awareness of Vatican secret control over power from Helsinki to Hollywood, Denmark to D.C., the Dragon of Rome is making attempts to cover her tracks again. 

President Donald Trump (trained by the Jesuits at Fordham then sent to “secular” University of Pennsylvania for his sheepskin) selected “Protestant” 10th Circuit Court Judge Neil McGill Gorsuch as his replacement. 

Gorsuch attends St. John’s Episcopal Church in Boulder, Colorado — the same parish as the family of JonBenét Ramsey. 

St. John’s is pastored by a woman, “Reverend” Susan Springer. She is notably Leftist in her teachings — as is the vast majority of all Episcopal churches. In fact, the Episcopalian Church is such a close off-shoot of Roman Catholicism it is often called in jest “Catholic Lite”. 

Amongst the Luciferians, any reference to “John” immediately calls up Templar worship of John the Baptist as the “true messiah” instead of Jesus Christ, known as “Johannism”. 

A Jewish journalist at the Washington Post wrote a prominent piece promoting Gorsuch as “the First Protestant on the Court in Years [162]” (he was, of course, confirmed by the Senate). 

The Washington Post is now home of Martin “Marty” Baron, the driving force behind the Boston Globe’s Spotlight exposé on Catholic sex abuse in that   city. It was his first action as Editor and he left shortly thereafter (almost as if he was on a mission to resuscitate the Globe’s mummified credibility). He’s now an Executive Editor at the Post. 

JonBenét 

If ever there were an obvious victim of the Devil’s Simulation it would be JonBenét Ramsey. 

The obsessive behavior of her parents, John Bennett and Patricia Ann “Patsy” Ramsey left all of the warning signs. 

Glamorizing a small child into adult sex appeal should be immediate cause for any “parent” to be under investigation but John Bennet was a millionaire who worked for Lockheed Martin. 

The fact that JonBenét was garroted and bludgeoned to death on Christmas Day in 1996 made it clear the perpetrators had an emotion-driven motive connected directly to the child. 

An autopsy revealed JonBenét’s vagina had been damaged and wiped clean. [163] 

She was even found in the basement of the family home. 

A 1999 grand jury voted to indict John and “Patsy” Ramsey as both abusive parents and accessories to the brutal murder of their 6 year-old little girl but then-District Attorney Alex Hunter refused. [164] 

41-year-old elementary school teacher John Mark Karr a was arrested in Bangkok, Thailand, in 2006. Karr confessed to the crime and evidence quickly ruled him out. 

What happened to JonBenét Ramsey remains “unsolved”. 

Or, perhaps a more accurate description would be “un-prosecuted”. 

Criminal Behavior 

What was the “motive” behind Alfred Kinsey’s “research”? 

There is no other explanation for the “data” in Sexual Behavior in the Human Male’s “Table 34” than satanic child sex abuse. [sick f*#K dc ]

Examples in Male include an “orgasm” from a two-month-old infant and 26 “orgasms” from a 4 year old boy in 24 hours. 

Even though Kinsey and his criminal cabal claimed (then and now) not to have directly participated in nor encouraged crimes against children, the fact that “orgasms” were “timed with a stop watch” means perpetrators were instructing in criminal abuse of children, toddlers and infants. 

Eventually, they divulged that they were also directly involved, themselves.

Pomeroy claimed: 

Kinsey tried to train me to help with interviewing the children, but I found that I wasn’t good at it. For that matter, none of the other staff members was any more successful at this delicate job, and Kinsey had to do nearly all of it alone. 56 ... 

Pomeroy explains how critics were lulled into a false sense of security about the sources of the child samples by Kinsey’s euphemistic description of the interview process: 

He concentrated at first on the three-, four- and five-year-old levels, working primarily in nursery schools... 58 [165] 

The true agenda of the “Kinsey Institute” is personal gratification via the most perverse sex possible and to legitimize it as “science” to be used by other deviant Elites. 

Kinsey was the worst of them and did directly participate in criminal acts. 

Kinsey told Dr. Frank K. Shuttleworth of the Institute of Child Welfare, University of California at Berkeley, “that students in the field had all been ‘too prudish’ to make an actual investigation of sperm count in early adolescent males.” Pomeroy stated that Kinsey himself collected “some material” in the “first ejaculate,” but “he did not yet have any actual counts.” 59 

The third research method employed by the Kinsey team entailed genital experiments; observing, recording, and filming not only adults, but children and infants as well. This technique primarily underpins Chapter 5 of the Male volume and Chapter 4 of the Female volume. Data about the sexual response of children could not be obtained by interview, and the precise details on how the data were obtained may never be fully revealed. It will likely require intense public pressure to force full disclosure. As noted, however, comments about the process have occasionally surfaced from Kinsey Institute team members. In Human Sexualities (1997), John Gagnon, a Kinsey Institute associate, offhandedly acknowledges the illegality of the experiments: 

A less neutral observer than Kinsey would have described these events as sex crimes, since they involved sexual contact between adults and children. Whether or not these observers were “scientifically trained” [as Kinsey claimed] it seems advisable to use caution in interpreting their findings. 60 

Gagnon did not demand that the adults who committed the “sex crimes” be arrested and prosecuted, or that the public be fully informed about the ghastly project. ... 

During the past half-century, enormous changes in law, medicine, science, and education have been wrought by Kinsey’s data. [166] 

Again proving the existence of the Devil’s Simulation, and that ritual child sex abuse, torture and murder are foundational and systemic, Kinsey and his criminal subordinates cultivated monsters everywhere and then trained and encouraged them. 

Kinsey and his team also collected films of children engaged in sex acts, a fact confirmed in 1981 by Kinsey’s coauthor Paul Gebhard. In a letter to this author, while he was director of the Kinsey Institute, Gebhard stated: 

Since sexual experimentation with human infants and children is illegal, we have had to depend upon other sources of data. Some of these were parents, mostly college-educated, who observed their children and kept notes for us. A few were nursery school owners or teachers. Others were homosexual males interested in older, but still prepubertal, children. One was a man who had numerous sexual contacts with male and female infants and children and, being of a scientific bent, kept detailed records of each encounter. 

Some of these sources have added to their written or verbal reports photographs and, in a few instances, cinema... The techniques involved [included] adult-child contacts — chiefly manual or oral. 

[While “Esther,” appearing on the British documentary, stated:] My father did mail some questionnaires… I believe to the Kinsey Institute about the sexual abuse he was doing on me… since 1938, which makes me about four years old... I know he had a… camera that he used... There was one time when I do remember a movie camera was running and he says, oh, don’t pay attention to that... You could only be a little girl to understand that it couldn’t possibly be enjoyed. That was slavery. 36 [Emphasis in original.] 

That the Kinsey team permitted, and possibly filmed and/or participated in, the sexual abuse of infants and children is confirmed by its own writings and reports. Members readily admitted that, methodologically, they viewed all human beings as mere animals, and often boasted that they did not recognize any moral or legal restraints on their research. [167] 

When Kinsey couldn’t find children, he would settle for adult homosexual trysts in any seedy venue he could find from rest stop urinals to back rooms in “tea houses”. [168] 

It was all carefully scrubbed from the propaganda that was his public image. 

Although not all homosexuals are pedophiles, homosexuality (especially amongst men) is a gateway to more extreme sexual perversion [xvi] and Kinsey found his lifestyle and trysts fertile ground for expanding his pedophile connections. 

Moving in homosexual circles, Kinsey would have likely met many educated sexual deviants eager to tell him about their sex lives. Pomeroy reported that one of their technically trained “observers” was a man who collected detailed data on orgasm from as many as 800 children. He was “a college graduate who had a responsible government job,” 54 while the current Kinsey director, John Bancroft, euphemistically described the same man as an “elderly scientist.” 55 Kinsey, Pomeroy, and Bancroft acknowledge that Kinsey directed at least two serial child rapists — one a lawyer and the other described as a “college” man. [169] 

Non-standard sexuality is the easy target — which is why it’s the subject of excessive emotion and hyperbole. 

Even more insidious is the role of pornography. Even the least explicit forms of pornography — media that only show nudes — still engender lust that soon fixates on children. [170] 

Kinsey and his “Institute” not only spun their “findings” they carefully censored anything negative to encourage readers to believe there are no harmful effects from the worst of sexual perversions. 

With relish did Alfred Kinsey — the malignant homosexual deviant with hatred towards women — lay this trap for the fair sex. 

Rape, jealousy, venereal disease, pregnancy, out-of-wedlock birth, and abortion are largely non-existent in the Kinsey data. Thus, Kinsey created the possibility of a carefree, aggressive ... sexuality. Perhaps the most damaging outcome to be based on Kinsey’s fraudulent data was the myth that women could, and should, separate responsibility and commitment from sex and sex from fertility and childbirth. 

Rather callously Kinsey claimed to have found sexual abuse of young girls to be harmless, claiming that adult women were never traumatized by childhood sexual abuse and incest. [171]

In the thousands of crimes of Kinsey-inspired abuse of children, Sexual Behavior in the Human Female (published in 1953) remarked of only one instance where an adult male violating a little girl caused serious injury and only a “few instances” of internal bleeding which readers are assured “did not appear to do any appreciable damage”. [172] 

Children were redefined as “potential sex partners”. [173] 

Kinsey was even more desperate for depravity in Female than Male despite his practice of seeking prostitutes and prison inmates for “interviews”. Much of Female’s data was fabricated whole cloth and terms like “legally married” were expunged. 

The innocence and vulnerability of animals was not overlooked. They, too, were victimized and recommended for exploitation by the “scientists”. 

Kinsey’s attempt to normalize bestiality has surfaced in sex education and pornography, including Kinsey coauthor Wardell Pomeroy’s bestselling sex education text, Boys and Sex: 16 

Having sex with the male animal, whether it is a dog, horse, bull, or some other species, may provide considerable erotic excitement for the boy or older adult... 

His enjoyment of the relationship is enhanced by the fact that the male animal responds to the point of orgasm... 

Psychically, animal relations may become of considerable significance to the boy who is having regular experience… and in no point basically different from those that are involved in erotic responses to human situations. 17 

Kinsey, Pomeroy, and Martin essentially held that “sexual contacts between the human and animals of other species are at no point basically different from those that are involved in erotic responses to human situations.” 18 This gives perspective to the disordered admissions of Kinsey colleague Dr. Clarence Tripp during his interview for the August 1998 Yorkshire documentary “Kinsey Paedophiles.” 

Dr. Tripp, sexologist and psychologist-author of The Homosexual Matrix (1975), candidly stated, 

If you go out and masturbate dogs — I was very good at this when I was a boy — the dog will love you to pieces because the dog has no efficient way to masturbate. He loves the orgasm as much as anybody else but he can’t self-produce it. Now you just do this a time or two. The dogs do various... things. You try this on all the neighborhood dogs... 

Some dogs will always expect or try to talk you into doing it... 

Other dogs will come to any human and say, please touch me here in a certain kind of way. [174] 

A Kinsey Institute author, psychologist and “sexologist” used to masturbate dogs as a boy. One would think this information would’ve been essential to a critical look at Kinsey and the “Kinsey Institute” but the BBC disagreed. “Surprisingly” it didn’t make the cut. 

That snippet from the interview was not broadcast, but the documentation is in this author’s archive. 

This also speaks to the character of “scientists” employed at the “Kinsey Institute”. 

It is instructive that, even during the happy hunting of World War II (when both shepherds and sheepdogs were engaged elsewhere), the vast majority of child victims were from non-nuclear families. 

The subjects were largely from fatherless and unconventional homes with a high incidence of early sexual experience. [175] 

This demographic holds true throughout the Devil’s Simulation. The most condemned child anywhere is an orphan in the care of the Catholic Church. 

The second-most is a child being promoted by self-serving parents. 

Another concept completely fabricated by Kinsey is that of each gender having a “sexual peak” greatly divergent from the other. This lie (either that “peaks” are divergent or that they even exist at all) has helped destroy commitment to marriage almost as much as pornography. 

Sexual abuse and exploitation of a child requires a seared conscience and a soul-less will desperately enslaved to lust. These maladies infect an individual to varying degrees but when one’s monstrous proclivities surges above the rest, he is recognized and promoted in the Devil’s Simulation. 

Such was Rex King. 

King had been found and cultivated by Kinsey’s mentor, Robert Latou Dickinson. Dickinson was an English gynecologist infamous for a fixation on human private parts. He used “medical examination” as an excuse for excessive groping and he recorded volumes of detailed drawings of his patient’s anatomies — usually without their permission or understanding of his activities. [176] 

The fact that Dickinson was a “gynecologist” in Britain, connected to King in America, who had mentored Alfred Kinsey and handed King off to Kinsey, is more proof that the Devil’s Simulation exists and that it’s crimes are systemic, spanning ages, governments and continents. 

They were such good friends, Kinsey arranged for Dickinson to do a sex lecture at Indiana University. [177] 

Dickinson is not the only sexual deviant to hide in the field of gynecology. It is the one discipline that should be heavily weighted in favor of female doctors but even they are not immune to the temptation of criminal betrayal of doctor/patient trust. 

As further proof of the systemic nature of child abuse (a fact left unaddressed by Judith Reisman, the BBC or any other “mainstream” source), serial child rapist Rex King was a representative of the United States government. King, like Kinsey, was spared participation in World War II. 

King used his mobility and government credentials to insulate him as he targeted fatherless home after fatherless home in a country at war. 

Under the encouragement and tutelage of Dickinson and Kinsey, King raped hundreds of children for decades. He was never charged, arrested or even caught by anyone with the power to do so. 

Harvard “sexologist” and Kinsey team member (which means he had been sodomized by Kinsey) Paul Henry Gebhard was interviewed by the BBC and chuckled over King’s predations; “sex was his main hobby in life”. [178] 

Gephard excused the sexual psychopath with “he was interested in having sex with men, women, children and animals, and he just was curious to see what would happen.” 

Another Kinsey “researcher” (and homosexual partner), Clarence Arthur Tripp told the BBC that King’s first sexual experience was intercourse with his grandmother. “In the 38 members of his family tree he had sex with almost all of them,” Tripp happily told the documentary crew. 

“He had had intercourse with hundreds upon hundreds of males and females of every conceivable age.” 

Rex King was certainly the type of well-adjusted individual “scientists” would train and set upon fatherless children across America’s southwest. 

That is exactly what happened as Tripp admitted, “My memory is that it exceeded 600 [rape, assault and abuse victims] for both boys and girls who haven’t yet got to maturity.” 

Tripp was sent to Kinsey from 20th Century Fox as a trained cameraman. He became the Institute’s pornographer. 

Even though the Devil’s Simulation has a strangle-hold on cops, judges and government officials, it doesn’t have them all and fears the combined might of the people. As a result, when dealing with King, the Kinsey Institute gave him the code names “Mr. X,” or “Mr. Green”. 

In arrogance over their power, Tripp bragged to the BBC that there was nothing wrong with how they had enabled King because he had never been arrested. 

King was a good student of Dickinson and Kinsey and meticulously recorded every detail of his crimes in hand-written journals. 

Kinsey wouldn’t allow the remotest risk that the journals would fall into the hands of a normal citizen or, worse, a government official who wasn’t on the pedophile payroll. In June of 1944 (the height of the war), Kinsey drove 1800 miles from Indiana to Arizona to take them by hand from his trained monster. They remain locked up at Indiana University to this day, without the slightest chance of being confiscated by a warrant from law enforcement. 

Encouraged by “science”, King wrote in his diary, “experimented with baby ...” he then remarked about how the baby reacted to being sexually tortured and violated. Kinsey continued to spur King on to new levels of heinous acts, writing to him in a letter, “I congratulate you on the research spirit which has led you to collect data over these many years.” [179] 

Chapter 5 of Male contained large portions of King’s diary; but rather than admit them to be the “encouraged research” of a serial monster, Kinsey presented them as “scientific proof that children were sexual from birth.” 

There was nothing “scientific” about it; Kinsey simply regurgitated the pedophile’s twisted version of his rapes of children, toddlers and even infants. 

The descriptions of their reactions included remarks like “extreme tension”, “groaning”, “sobbing”, “violent jerking of the entire body”, “an abundance of tears, especially amongst younger children” — all indicative of sadistic torture of the young. 

Even friendly biographer James Jones admitted, “the individual in question, I think, uh, harmed, in serious ways, ah, a large number of young people.” [180] [ brilliant  deduction Sherlock geez d.c ]

Judith Reisman — via her own privileged access to the unedited Yorkshire documentary — was able to recount another clip that didn’t make it off the cutting floor where Jones acquiesced “Christian outrage” to the BBC: 

"Do you think it is right that the Kinsey Institute continues to protect him? Which is more important, confidentiality or “those children?” Jones replied, “In my mind those children,” and continued, 

I don’t think the Christian right is wrong on that. I think they have their right to be outraged... political ideology really doesn’t have much to do with people’s reactions to child abuse. 

Countering the Kinsey Institute’s defense that the children did not “complain” about their abuse, Jones asked, 

How did they know they didn’t complain? The person who was rendering that information is the same person who abused them. It seems to me that they have as much credibility as a rapist would have, saying that the victim enjoyed the rape. [[181]] 

Per Kinsey’s direction, King specifically targeted the youngest of boys from infants through toddlers to “determine” for Kinsey exactly when they were capable of “orgasm”. This was regurgitated by Kinsey as “scientific” data for “Table 31”. 

“Table 32” listed the details Kinsey had encouraged King to take down such as timing of these “orgasms”. 

What Tables 32 and 34 (so-called “multiple orgasms” of children) showed was that King had repeatedly preyed upon his victims sometimes for as long as a full day of torture for Kinsey. 

At minimum, 317 of the youngest possible children were violated, perhaps as many as over 1,200. 

Vincent Nowlis remarked to the BBC that infants brought to “orgasm” chronicled “to fractions [listed to hundredths] of a second” was “an absurd page in science...I didn’t feel it had a place in a ‘scientific’ book”. 

Recall that Nowlis was a willing team member who only shirked from being sodomized by Kinsey. 

In response, Clearance Tripp told the BBC, “...Nowlis was damaged in childhood with all this morality. And then he had this peculiar moralistic wife — I’m understating it — through all this it sounded to him like pure sin” — the raping of infants and toddlers, that is. 

Like Vincent Nowalis, his wife was not a fan of participating in a sexual free-for-all “at work” nor being violated by the great Alfred Kinsey — all necessary if Nowalis wished to stay aboard the Institute. 

At the time of the BBC documentary, “sexologist” Dr. John H.J. Bancroft was Director of the “Kinsey Institute”. Being a Cambridge man with four names means that if he makes a statement that is ridiculous or nonsensical, it’s because you lack the intelligence to understand him. 

Bancroft told the BBC that he did, indeed, consider Rex King’s serial child abuse to be “research” and that to betray King to law enforcement would’ve been “immorality of the highest order”. 

In Dr. John H.J. Bancroft’s world, white is black and black is white. 

Friendly Kinsey biographer Jonathan Gathorne-Hardy told the BBC that he saw evidence “Mr. Green” continued to rape children for another decade after first meeting Kinsey. Gathorne-Hardy would know, as an Institute-approved biographer, he was given special access to the criminal database locked deep in the University of Indiana campus. 

Judith Reisman added — 

Jonathan Gathorne-Hardy, a recent Kinsey biographer (Sex the Measure of All Things; A Life of Alfred C. Kinsey, London: Chatto & Winds, 1998), reveals that Kinsey Institute Director John Bancroft secretly allowed him to read and copy Kinsey’s pedophile team reports: 

[Kinsey] was deeply affected by five paedophile headmasters who...had... loving relationships with young adolescent boys of twelve or thirteen. ... The reason the Kinsey Institute is so careful...is that...they have... evidence of sexual behaviors that even now are illegal. ... 

Gathorne-Hardy perused Rex King’s records. He confirmed that King was indeed the individual whom Wardell Pomeroy said raped at least 800 infants, children, kin, and strangers: 

Eight or nine typewritten volumes [were] typed up by Kinsey’s wife... prior to 1945, which was, you know, before Kinsey admitted [he had employed King. King] went on having sex with everybody until the end... long after Kinsey got the journals. The material in that chapter almost entirely came from [King’s] journals which Kinsey got in 1944/45. 

I daren’t put this on film. I did read [King’s records] but Bancroft doesn’t want me to say I read them. Bancroft says that if the people know I read them they will go to him and say, you’ve let one scholar have them, and I’m not going to do that. So what I had to say in my book is that I closely questioned Bancroft and Gebhard about the contents of the journals, but I didn’t read them. In fact, I did read them. But I can’t say I read them. [[182]] 

Jonathan Gathorne-Hardy had nothing to worry about. That portion of his interview was also edited from the BBC’s final “hard-hitting” exposé. 

Although the “Institute” likes to maintain plausible deniability in regards to Rex King’s serial child rape, Kinsey subordinate Clarence Tripp told Yorkshire he personally validated as much of King’s “research” as possible. 

Interviewer: what you’re saying then is that it is possible that Kinsey personally validated [King’s] material [the sex with children]? 

Tripp: Almost always... there is no mention of his observing people. But he did. He wanted to see everything. This is a hands-on scientist... he had to see it to really believe it... He poked into, he looked at everything. He often had to have these things photographed because he simply didn’t have time... [Kinsey] was in the market for everything... people who are into special things, love to document it. And it seems to rev them up if they mark it down on a calendar. [183] 

This, too, was only available via the unedited copy given to Dr. Judith Reisman. 

But Rex King (a representative of the United States government) wasn’t the only mass child rapist to help Alfred Kinsey in his push for sexual anarchy. The “Institute” was connected to another abuser of monstrous proportion: Fritz von Ballusek. 

Judith Reisman recounted — 

Thanks to the Yorkshire documentary, we now know that “Mr. X” was Rex King, and we also know the name of at least one other key Kinsey pedophile. In a classic case of truth being stranger than fiction, one of Kinsey’s child sex experimenters was a World War II Nazi Storm Trooper. Yorkshire Television researchers uncovered his name, photograph, history, and court records. After the war, Dr. Fritz von Balluseck became a respected lawyer. 

Yorkshire investigators had followed up this author’s original questions regarding Kinsey’s association with Nazis and the possibility that some of the abused children were obtained from WWII Germany and/or Russia. At least one of Kinsey’s sex collaborators was a documented Nazi, the infamous George Sylvester Viereck, a convicted German spy who had worked among Washington D.C. power brokers. David Brinkley in his history of the period, Washington Goes to War (Ballantine, 1988, p. 26) wrote that Viereck was “one of the...masterminds of the propaganda cabinet that Germany set up here early in the war.” [184] 

An extremely important factor that neither Yorkshire, the BBC nor Judith Reisman noted was how a connection to espionage shows the hand of the Luciferian hierarchy in Rome. War between nation-states is completely unnecessary and must be carefully manipulated. “Intelligence” sets the stage (especially via double and triple agents of supposed enemy intelligence agencies working together) and illegal trafficking in drugs, arms and human beings both insures wars and benefits from them. 

Examples include the Nazi / Soviet intelligence co-operative “Red Orchestra” (Die Rote Kapelle) run by Jesuit agents like Martin Bormann. [185] 

Another is the death of General George S. Patton; grievously wounded by an OSS assassin and the Soviet NKVD was sent to his hospital to finish the job. [186] Patton was at risk for outing how men like Eisenhower, Bradley, Churchill and Roman Catholic traitor General Walter Bedell “Beatle” Smith (the CIA’s first Director) had all been complicit in the needless prolonging of the war. 

We will see more of these “missed” Intelligence/Pedocracy connections in Chapter 13. 

Yorkshire researchers flew to Berlin (as did this author), interviewing and digging through old files and press reports. There they discovered Dr. Friedrich Karl Hugo Viktor von Balluseck, who was tried in Berlin in 1957 for a child sex murder. According to Paul Gebhard who took over serving as the prestigious Director of Indiana University’s Kinsey Institute, just after Kinsey’s death:

[Kinsey] wrote him questions in the letter and they carried on quite a correspondence... 

Police [seeking a child sex murderer] went through his possessions... found his correspondence with Kinsey. ... They got Interpol. ... The FBI put pressure on Kinsey to reveal the guy’s sexual diary. Kinsey said, absolutely not. The poor paedophile... had his reputation destroyed... finally quit corresponding with us. 

Like Kinsey, fascist scientists in Germany 92 believed that they had a right to experiment on anyone. Dr. von Balluseck 93 was an incest offender who raped and sodomized not only his own offspring, but Jewish, Polish, and German children as well, from roughly 1927 to 1957. The German press reported Kinsey’s visit to Frankfort during his world tour in 1956. Little else is available regarding the German stopover, or if Kinsey met with Balluseck, and there was no mention of Kinsey’s visit to Frankfort in the approved writings about Kinsey’s European travels. [187] 

German judges, police and national government officials were (are) just as corrupt as their American counterparts. The frauds at the Federal Bureau of “Investigation” politely asked Kinsey and Indiana University for the evidence that showed he had collaborated with and encouraged a serial child rapist and sadistic psychopath. Both Kinsey and Indiana U. courageously stood their ground and refused the timid G-men. 

Don’t try this at home, however. When Federal agents are ready to come after you they will surveil you without due process and send a literal army of officers in camouflaged body armor, wielding assault weapons and riding in armored vehicles to storm your home at 3 a.m. being sure to kill your dog before you even know what hit you. 

In Germany, after decades of raping and torturing children “Doctor” von Ballusek walked free from the death of the one little girl he finally went to trial for slaughtering. 

By the way, all of this below was also edited out of the Yorkshire tell-all exposé. 

Dr. von Balluseck’s trial for the murder of 10-year-old Loiselotte Has, who was “found… naked and throttled… on a piece of wasteland,” was widely covered in Germany [xvii] . It was “completely unprecedented in the moral history of the post war era,” and von Balluseck was described as “the most important pedophile in the criminal history of Berlin.” Kinsey collaborator Balluseck was tried for the abuse of 50, or “more than 100,” or ”several hundred” children. As noted, he had sexually violated children for “over the last three decades” (Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, May 22, 1957). 

News of Kinsey’s role in the case was splashed across the headlines of Germany’s largest newspapers. 

Judge Heinrich Berger “emphasized again and again the important function played by the press in warning the public against paedophiles like Balluseck, who approach children as understanding friends and helpers in their sexual need” (Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, May 22, 1957). Despite Alfred Kinsey’s shocking role in the explosive case, the U.S. press was uniformly silent about it. [ US Media has always protected the scum, still doing it 65 years later dc ]

According to Yorkshire Television’s research department, from 1942 to 1944 Dr. von Balluseck was the Department of Justice District Kreishauptmina, the commandant of the small Polish town of Jedrzejow. It was there that he targeted the children he sexually assaulted, warning them, according to German news accounts, that “It is either the gas chamber or me.” The Encyclopedia Judaica 94 reports that all Jedrejow Jews ended up in the gas chambers. All, including the children, were under the control of Dr. von Balluseck. [188] 

It’s an unexplained shame why Yorkshire and the BBC should put so much effort into exposing “Kinsey’s Paedophiles” and then leave the best of it on the cutting room floor. 

At this writing, 60 years after von Ballusek walked for the murder of Loiselette Has, the Vatican is still targeting Poland for sexual perversion. Poland provided Rome with devout servants like American National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski (the Jesuit-trained operative who created al Qaeda [189] ) and his dear friend Karol Józef Wojtyła. Despite his role in helping Nazis slaughter Jews during WWII, [190] Karol Wojtyła was recently canonized Pope Saint John Paul II ... or maybe because of it.

The Vatican has made “World Youth Day” in Poland, June of 2017, the location for the unveiling of its “Youth Sex Education” program; one which has conservative Catholics quite upset. 

The program was overseen by Archbishop Vincenzo Paglia. It was not the first time Paglia was the fomenter of outrage. 

Harkening back to Medieval aristocracy, Paglia commissioned a homosexual Argentinean named Ricardo Cinalli to paint a homo-erotic mural in his cathedral in 2007. 

It depicts Jesus carrying nets to heaven filled with naked and semi-nude homosexuals, transsexuals, prostitutes, and drug dealers, jumbled together in erotic interactions. 

Cinalli told the Italian newspaper La Repubblica in March 2016 that the archbishop oversaw every detail of the work. 

“There was no detail that was done freely, at random,” he said. “Everything was analyzed. Everything was discussed. They never allowed me to work on my own.” 

In the right-hand net, what appears to be young naked children can be seen entangled with the bodies of older men and women... 

In one instance, one male can be seen with his hand between another male’s legs groping his reproductive organ. 

The image of the Savior is painted with the face of a local male hairdresser, and his private parts can be seen through his translucent garb. 

Included in one of the nets is Paglia, the then diocesan bishop. Wearing his skull cap, he is depicted as clutching another semi-nude man who is tenderly embracing him. 

Cinalli told La Repubblica that the naked people in the nets were meant to be “erotic,” although he said Paglia drew the line when Cinalli proposed to show people actually copulating. ~ LifeSite [191] 

Paglia was hand-picked by Jesuit Pope Francis (Jorge Bergoglio, also from Argentina) to be President of the Pontifical Academy for Life and the Pope Saint John Paul II Institute for Studies on Marriage and Family. 

He was “uniquely qualified”. 

When he came aboard, Paglia summarily dismissed all the members [192] so that he and his Jesuit Pope could start from scratch, adding such family/life stalwarts as pro-abortion, pro-euthanasia Anglican professor Nigel Biggar. [193] 

From his position as the Godfather of Rome’s “family” doctrines, Paglia has ushered in a sex education program that mirrors his values and that of his superior — to cut out the role of parents as guardians over their children and to entice children into the sexual chaos of the Devil’s Simulation. 

The sex-ed program, titled “The Meeting Point: Course of Affective Sexual Education for Young People,” was criticized by Catholic life-and-family leaders for bypassing parents as the primary educators of their children and for its immoral content. 

The program was also criticized for failing to name and condemn immoral sexual behaviors, such as fornication, prostitution, adultery, contraceptive-sex, homosexual activity, and masturbation as objectively sinful actions that destroy charity in the heart and turn one away from God. 

Along with using sexually explicit and suggestive images in activity workbooks, the program recommended various sexually explicit movies as springboards for discussion. [194] 

Back in 1957, the connection between von Ballusek and Alfred Kinsey was momentarily mentioned by the suddenly-awakened German press (remember, Kinsey has been OK’d as a target by the Vatican). 

The German press described early attempts to “cover up” who Balluseck really was, including efforts to keep his photograph under wraps and the court description of the influential attorney as a “shop-worker.” And commenting on the experiments recorded in volumes found in von Balluseck’s desk, Judge Berger exclaimed: “This is no longer human! What was this all for? To tell Kinsey about?” (Morgenpost, May 16, 1957). [195] 

Once the Devil’s Simulation network connected Kinsey and von Ballusek, the “scientist” did all he could to encourage the sadist. Neither he nor his collaborators at Indiana University were held to account. 

Nor, for that matter, was von Ballusek. 

“KINSEY…ASKED THE PAEDOPHILE SPECIFICALLY FOR MATERIAL OF HIS PERVERSE ACTIONS” 

The connection with Kinsey, towards whom he’d showed off his crimes, had a disastrous effect on [von Balluseck]... In his diaries he’d stuck in the letters from the sex researcher, Kinsey in which he’d been encouraged to continue his research. ... He had also started relationships… to expand his researches. One shivers to think of the lengths he went to. [TSP, May 17, 1957, emphasis added] 

Indeed, the German press reported that Post WW II von Balluseck sexually assaulted his own daughter, and the 11-year-old son of a vicar, and forced the boy to write down the acts for Kinsey. 

Kinsey had asked the paedophile specifically for material of his perverse actions. The presiding judge, Dr. Berger noted that it was Kinsey’s duty to get Balluseck locked up, instead of corresponding with him. [Berliner Zeitung, May 16, 1957] 

In the diaries, described as volume 1 & 4, he described with pedantic exactness, how he committed his crimes. ... Balluseck had close contact with the so called American sex researcher, Kinsey, to whom he’d repeatedly and explicitly reported his perverse crimes. 

Balluseck had also described those in pedantic detail in his diaries. [National-Zeitung, May 15, 1957] 

So Balluseck was not only sending Kinsey his old child abuse data, recorded during his days as a Commandant in Jedrzejow; he was also seeking to “continue” and “expand” his sexual seduction of children for Kinsey’s use. 

The University of Indiana press office regularly forwards international articles about the school (especially those containing damaging information) to the administration. According to Paul Gebhard, the University and its president, Herman Wells, were aware of Kinsey’s collaboration with Balluseck. 

Kinsey refused to provide evidence that the FBI knew he had regarding Balluseck’s crimes. 

After serving his sentence for child sex abuse (he was not convicted on the murder charge), Balluseck continued his correspondence with Gebhard... [196] 

Again, it’s amazing how someone can “refuse” a Federal investigation into serial child abuse but we don’t recommend you attempt that should the FBI come “knocking” at 3 a.m. 

Although Kinsey dare not risk overseeing his Nazi “researcher” during the war, he may very well have gotten some “hands on” afterward as part of his 1955 “world tour”. 

Judith Reisman admits that the central focus of the tour was Italy — 

Pomeroy devotes six pages to Kinsey’s visits to France, Denmark, Norway, and Sweden, but ten pages to his trip to Italy alone. [197] 

— but makes no mention of the fact that Italy is the host nation to the most powerful religion on Earth. 

Italy briefly attracted another sexual sado-satanist of equal infamy; Edward Alexander “Aleister” Crowley. 

Crowley (1845-1947) called himself alternatively “the Beast” and “the World’s Most Wicked Man”. A pagan/satanist, he was and remains one of the most influential men of the 20th century. Immortalized by propagandists, he was sung about by Black Sabbath’s lead vocalist Ozzy Osbourne in his second single “Mr. Crowley”, released in 1980. In the song, the hint at child sacrifice is unmistakable. 

Mr. Crowley, what went down in your head? 

Mr. Crowley, did you talk to the dead 

Your lifestyle to me seems so tragic 

With the thrill of it all 

You fooled all the people with magic 

You waited on Satan’s call 

Mr. Charming, did you think you were pure 

Mr. Alarming, in nocturnal rapport 

Uncovering things that were sacred, manifest on this earth 

Conceived in the eye of a secret 

Yeah, they scattered the afterbirth ... 

Crowley took over the British chapter of “Ordo Templi Orientis” — a secret society based upon an amalgamation of the Templars and the Freemasons. ... 

The O.T.O. has a hierarchy of attainment by “degrees”, as the Freemasons do, but in the O.T.O. there are only 12 degrees. 

The perverse tie-in to Rome is shocking and unmistakable. 

While the O.T.O.’s initiatory system is a sort of Kafkaesque bureaucratic club game, it has a religious association under its obedience: The Gnostic Catholic Church — one of the O.T.O. groups — intends “to restore Christianity to its real status as a solar-phallic religion.” ~ Koenig 1471 

The VI° of the O.T.O. is the “Illustrious Knight Templar of the Order of Kadosch, Companion of the Holy Grail” and a “Grand Inquisitor Commander” 1472 . Does Aleister Crowley sound like a satanist Beast to you...or a Papal one? 

The VIII° is the “Perfect Pontiff of the Illuminati” 1473 — the Pope of the Jesuit-created Freemason super-sect. 

The “working” of the degrees within the O.T.O. is meant to usher in the “Aeon of Horus”. 

Crowley asserted that man was first civilized under the Gaia-like “Aeon of Isis” where he worshipped “Mother Nature” in harmony with the Earth. 

What we understand as medieval history, Crowley calls the “Aeon of Osiris” and submission to the “Father god”. 

The offspring of Osiris and Isis is Horus and he is to be coaxed into this world by a series of satanic sex rituals Crowley called “sex magick” instituted in geographic locations called “workings” that are perceived to be interdimensional portals...or the most convenient apartment. 

This was all catalogued in Crowley’s “Thelema” religion (which he pulled entirely out of his “eye of Horus” with the help of his interdimensional friends Aiwass, Choronzon and Lam). ~ Illuminati Unmasked [198] 

Although Judith Reisman makes none of these connections, she does note that Crowley’s most sinister work took place in seclusion on the island of Sicily at his “Thelema Abbey”. There he got mothers to have sex with their children and then murdered them as a blood sacrifice. [199] 

Outrage eventually drove Crowley from his Italian base and he died soon after in 1947. 

Heinous satanic sexual activity like that was a top priority for the Kinsey “scientists” to see, even 7 years later. 

Kinsey was personally escorted around the “Abbey” by Crowley homosexual acolyte and pornographer, Kenneth Wilbur Anglemyer. According to Crowley “scholar” and biographer [200] Marco Pasi, Anglemyer gave Kinsey some of Crowley’s journal notes [201] on satanic sexual sadism — for “science”, of course. 

Like Crowley, Anglemyer was an English Freemason — a member of the “Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn”. [202] 

As a “dream-weaver” for the Devil’s simulation, Anglemyer was as equally influential in the entertainment industry. For propaganda, he renamed himself “Kenneth Anger” just as Papal Court Jew and clown prince of Satanism Howard Stanton Levey rebranded himself “Anton Szandor LaVey”. 

Anglemyer, Levey and Crowley have been “inspirational” to high-profile personalities of all sorts from Martin Scorsese to Mick Jagger. [203] 

Ken was obsessed with Crowley’s life & magic. As a child, Ken had danced with Shirley Temple in competition after she became a child star. ... 

Ken Anger did his casting for his film “Lucifer Rising” by telling occult friends & acquaintances that they could live out their goddess or god power-trip fantasies by acting for him. The British government’s National Film Finance Corp. fronted 15,000£ for Lucifer Rising’s production. Famous occult musician Jimmy Page did the sound track gratis. ... ~ Springmeier [204] 

The connection between Kenneth Anger and Shirley Temple will soon shock you as you read on into Chapter 6. 

Networking the Devil’s Simulation 

Not only was Kinsey plugged in to the existing pedophile network, he did all he could to expand it and add new member monsters. 

Esther White was on the receiving end of those efforts. 

She was tag-teamed for abuse by her father and grandfather starting at only 7 years of age. 

At the peak of the abuse, she discovered a questionnaire from Kinsey with detailed queries about what her father was doing to her and she realized why he timed his abuse with a watch. She asked him about its meaning and he explained it and said he had a “deadline” to meet; which means Kinsey was insuring as much harm happened as quickly as possible. 

White believes that the horrors she experienced were part of the subsequent Kinsey assertion in Sexual Behavior in the Human Female that children can enjoy being raped. [205] 

During her interview with Yorkshire/BBC, Esther White (well into her 70s) could not recount what happened to her as a child without breaking down in tears. 

Narrator: “In his final years, Kinsey would testify before legislatures and courts that pedophilia was a less dangerous problem than public intolerance of it.” 

Kinsey homosexual partner and “fellow scientist” Clarence Tripp proved that he remains a deviant sociopath to this day by saying for Yorkshire — 

Kinsey said some of the most brilliant imaginable about that [sic]. Ah, pedophilia is almost non-existent, um, ah, kind of crime and the thing he hated most about it is the people who use words like, like, ah “child molestation”. What is that? Nobody knows! Um [laughs] the — ah, “abuse of children”? Are they talking about bollicks [sic] them against the ear or hitting them with a stove pipe or are they talking about tickling them a little. Ah, are you talking about fondling — you gonna put fondling and death attacks in the same group? As Kinsey said, by this kind of paranoia, you do the child more damage, for life, than all the pedophiles in the world would do. 

We’re not sure how one is able to time “orgasms” on an infant with “tickling” but it’s probably something we all should be wary of now. 

Yorkshire then cut to Esther White — 

[choked with emotion] I think taking information from pedophiles glorifies the abuse. 

They [Kinsey Institute] used me and they used those children — for a lie. 

Another Kinsey homosexual partner and “scientist” Paul Gebhard then bragged to Yorkshire that the criminal records encouraged and solicited by the “Institute” are logged under code and that the code key can be quickly destroyed if there is any threat of court order investigation. 

If that is meant to be a tactical challenge to good men who might someday attempt to conduct the long-overdue law enforcement raid (storm Indiana University to secure the codes before they are destroyed and/or break the code without the key if necessary), we are certain it doesn’t pose much of a threat. The spirits of the Rangers who climbed the cliffs of Pointe Du Hoc while Kinsey and his accomplices were raping their children will help them achieve the impossible.

next

Preyed Upon 143s

1950: “Reverend Father” Lawrence C. Murphy begins a 25 year reign of predation and terror in Milwauk

notes & source

https://projectcognition.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Eaters-of-Children-The-Pedocracy-Exposed-How-Access-to-Power-is-Granted-Through-the-Rape-Torture-and-Ritualistic-Slaughter-of-the-Innocent-by-Giovanni-Cirucci.pdf

FAIR USE NOTICE

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. As a journalist, I am making such material available in my efforts to advance understanding of artistic, cultural, historic, religious and political issues. I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Copyrighted material can be removed on the request of the owner.