Part 1 : Under an Ionized Sky Chemtrails to Space Fence Lockdown...Project Cloverleaf

 Under an Ionized Sky, Chemtrails 

to Space Fence Lockdown

by Elana Freeland

Foreword

There is a world that most of us know of and that we are comfortable with. There is another world that we should know of but do not, and that should, by all rights, make us uncomfortable. We are responsible to learn of its existence, as it surrounds and affects our every move regardless of the level of bliss or ignorance that we adopt to ease our discomfort. Elana Freeland, in the second of a trilogy series, thrusts upon us the realities of that more complex world in her most recent work, Under an Ionized Sky: From Chemtrails to Space Fence Lockdown. We are destined within it to discover that the technological throes that dominate the modern world are much more developed, enmeshed, and controlling of our lives than most of us would like to either admit or confront. 

I have known Elana for some time now, and it was not known in our earlier café chats that we would someday share deeply in a common pursuit of truth. The focus of our work may differ in certain respects, but it is the same battle. Elana is providing a map of what is and what may well lie ahead in a world now gone berserk in the idols, greed, and powers of technocracy. It is our job to maintain our spiritual integrity in the clash that is before us, and this book will ask us to trade our ignorance and complacency for the awareness and strength that is needed in battle. 

The book is meticulously researched and documented, and she has done a great deal of your homework for you. The morass of controlling systems spoken of here does indeed exist, and they are of purpose and agenda. There is much for all of us to learn here and it is to our benefit to get up to speed quickly on the state of affairs. I hope that you will immerse yourself and gain the quick education that we all need, as proclaiming ignorance or innocence will be at our own peril. As Elana says, “It’s a brave new world.” Let us be brave together in its future. —

CLIFFORD E. CARNICOM

We in this country, in this generation, are—by destiny rather than choice—the watchmen on the walls of world freedom. — 

President John F. Kennedy, undelivered speech 

to the Dallas Citizens Council, Nov. 22, 1963 

Many people have criticized my research into the destruction of the WTC complex because I have not named the exact technology that was used in the destruction, including its make, model, and serial number. But it is erroneous to blindly discard evidence that does not conveniently describe a known weapon or blindly discard evidence that contradicts one’s pet theory. Remember, empirical evidence is the truth that theory must mimic, not the other way around. The pages of this book include a very great amount of evidence—evidence that must be explained. . . 

— Judy Wood, Ph.D., 

Where Did the Towers Go? 

Evidence of Directed Free-Energy 

Technology on 9/11, 2005

Preface

What occurred in New York City on September 11, 2001 and remains to haunt thousands, if not millions, was a blatant demonstration of the destructive power of what two interfering beams (possibly three, the third for holograms) from directed energy weapons (DEWs) can do. Everything subsequently framed as the “war on terror” sabotaged the direction of the entire nation, and the Nazi neocons and Deep State Democrats responsible are still at large. 

The 9/11 display of power was not the first time that Americans witnessed a DEW in action without realizing what they were looking at, though it was, to date, the most devastating. The downing of Parisbound TWA Flight 800 with 230 people on board on July 17, 1996 was also a scalar DEW. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) report documented dozens of witnesses who saw “something resembling a flare or firework ascend and culminate in an explosion.” As with 9/11, the initial hours after the crash were carefully controlled. 1 

Then there was the plane crash of Senator Paul Wellstone (D-MN), a member of the Democratic Farmer-Labor Party known to be critical of the War on Drugs preceding the War on Terror. When Wellstone visited Bogotá, Colombia in December 2000, he was drenched in chemical spray while witnessing aerial fumigation of a coca field. 2 Two years later on October 25, 2002, while investigating 9/11, he and his wife were killed in a plane crash. 

The NTSB accident report is disputed in the [2004] book American Assassination: The Strange Death of Senator Paul Wellstone by Don “Four Arrows” Jacobs and James H. Fetzer. The authors allege there are problems with “the official story” and that there is evidence of an official cover-up. One of their principal claims is that FBI personnel left the field office in St. Paul for northern Minnesota before the plane crashed. They propose that the plane was shot down with a directed-energy weapon. Snowshoe Documentary Films produced Wellstone: They Killed Him, a two-hour film that makes similar allegations. 3 

Then there was the space shuttle Columbia, STS-107, that blew up over Texas upon re-entry on February 1, 2003 after its twenty-eighth mission. A digital photograph snapped by an amateur San Francisco astronomer caught 

a purplish electrical bolt striking the craft as it streaked across the California sky. . .In the critical shot, a glowing purple rope of light corkscrews down toward the plasma tail, appears to pass behind it, then cuts sharply toward it from below. As it merges with the plasma trail, the streak itself brightens for a distance, then fades. 4 

In 2005, Where Did the Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11 by Judy Wood, Ph.D., closely examined how five-hundred-thousand-ton buildings a half-mile tall, steel girders, concrete, and people’s bodies could disintegrate to dust in eight to ten seconds: 

. . .a weapon that could produce all of the effects we saw on 9/11 would certainly not be in the public domain, no matter whose weapon it was . . .9/11 was the demonstration of a technology of horrendous magnitude. 5 

By means of evidentiary elimination, Wood discounts kerosene-fueled fire, thermite, and mini-nukes. No high heat meant it was not a laser. Next, she deduced a Hutchison Effect 6—interfering microwave energies in an electrostatic field remotely introduced into a rotating electric field to produce a magnetic field to make molecular dissociation occur: 

By beaming a specially tuned microwave energy pulse rather than laser or infrared beams, that energy can be targeted within a storm’s interior . . . 7 

The Hutchison Effect follows from ELF (extremely low frequency) steering of radio waves, high voltage, and electrostatic fields that can then produce 

(1) levitation; 

(2) fusion of dissimilar materials, e.g., metals “melting” without burning adjacent materials like paper and trees, the mythologized but very real 1943 Philadelphia Experiment, the 2x4s that skewered palm trees during Hurricane Andrew in 1992; 

(3) spontaneous fracturing of metals; and 

(4) changes in crystalline structure and physical properties. 

The backup system included eleven Stealth fighters possibly loaded with DEWs and computer programs, and explosive charges pre-placed in the towers for a boost, 8 while off the coast Hurricane Erin —whipped up by chemtrails and ionospheric heaters—waited to provide yet more energy if needed. Thunder (evidence of an electrical field) was heard at JFK, LaGuardia, and Newark Airports. As each tower collapsed in seconds, the Geophysical Institute Magnetometer Array (GIMA) at the University of Alaska tracked the anomalous changes in the Earth’s magnetic field, the timing, magnitude, and relationships of fluctuations uncannily and clearly related to the molecular dissociation of the towers. 

Cars were on fire but not adjacent trees or paper. Thousands of pieces of paper from ground zero were found in Brooklyn seven miles away. People described being “picked up and moved a block” by black clouds that “had substance,” as if they were inside an electrical storm or volcano. The St. Elmo’s Fire flames were impossible to put out with water. Like lightning, St. Elmo’s Fire is plasma: ionized air that emits a glow like a corona discharge, luminescence without heat. Bluish ball-like formations were seen, the same bluish ball lightning or fire columns that accompany electrical tornado systems. Were artificial “tornadoes” (rotating fields) disintegrating the towers while plasma orbs kept an eye on the holocaust? 

Photographer David Handschuh described what he witnessed when the South Tower disintegrated: 

And then this noise filled the air that sounded like a high-pressure gas line had been ruptured. And it seemed to come from all over, not from any one direction . . .And then all of a sudden the second tower explodes. . .I was just walking by myself and heard. . .another loud noise that kind of echoed the first noise . . .Looked up and OK it’s another aircraft. . .and the whole building was just disintegrating. 9 

Lieutenant Richard Smiouskas described a “huge volume like ten stories high billowing, pushing black smoke and like a glitter.” 10 

Disintegrating glass? Barium and quartz? Plasma is highly conductive and fluoresces light. 

Targeted individual Carolyn Williams Palit (whose brilliant insights I quote over and over but who apparently has not outlived her persecutors) believed that the two airplanes hitting the North and South towers were holograms projected onto plasma to cloak the missiles used. Two or three seconds before the missiles hit the towers, the plasmoid holograms caused a Faraday cabin effect (like a car hit by lightning). Palit explained the hologram process this way: Two plasma beams twist around each other like pearl necklaces, one beam transmitting 2D visuals of an airliner (like a Birkeland current), and one beam heating the chemtrails to make metal-induced, ionized gas plasma (like a splay-beam weapon). A third beam is added from another ionospheric heater installation, possibly from Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) out on Long Island, to complete the 3D hologram. David Masem, who worked as a Unix Systems Administrator at BNL2000–2003: 

Not only does BNL have a mini-HAARP, but it also has a collider / accelerator buried in the Earth that is one mile in diameter with four collision detect points every quarter of a mile. I worked at the collision detect point for Project AEROSOL where collisions were done to determine the effects of nanoparticulates on the environment. Immediately after 9/11, the U.S. Navy came in and took control of BNL operations and since then has ramped up its nanotechnology department. The collider / accelerator at BNL or RHIC (Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider) was at that time networked to two other collider / accelerators: CERN and another in Japan. With its close proximity to Manhattan, it would have been perfectly located to use its mini-HAARP steering beam as a directed energy weapon to further propagate 9/11. Oh, the stories I could tell you about Brookhaven National Labs would make your head spin. 11 

Thanks to post-9/11 billions 12 and the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 (Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism) that expanded military / intelligence surveillance and communications, Project Cloverleaf aerosol spraying and ionospheric heater manipulation of the atmosphere was kicked into high gear. 

When the electrostatically charged Ames strain of anthrax was sent through the mail to critics of the Bush II administration, the trail led the FBI to Battelle Memorial Institute, a CIA front company specializing in weapons, 13 at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base. Under Project Jefferson and the CIA’s Project Clear Vision, Battelle had engineered a static charge on the anthrax so that the spores would float out of the opened envelope and into the air. 14 Battelle’s corporate partner Bioport—founded by a financier of the bin Laden family through the infamous and shadowy (Bush family) Carlyle Group—made multi-millions from the rush to stockpile anthrax vaccine. And what happened to the five Raytheon executives covering UAV [unmanned aerial vehicle] projects with Mode 4 or 5 upgrades? They were on AA Flights 77 and 11 and UA Flight 175 15 and probably thought they were on a UAV test flight.

Raytheon owned HAARP patents and figured deeply in the government terrorist event of September 11, 2001:

• Raytheon oversaw the Florida flight school that trained the “hijackers” 

• Raytheon had acquired Hughes Aircraft and its fleet of A-3 Skywarriors for testing air-to-air and air-to-ground missile systems, guidance and EW systems for the U.S. Air Force, Navy, and Marines, meaning that Raytheon could have provided the AGM A-3 Skywarrior with Mode 4 or 5 IFF transponders that gouged the sixteen-foot hole through three rings of the Pentagon in Washington, D.C. (No 757 could have done it.) 

• Raytheon oversaw the flight that spirited the bin Laden family out of the country while all other flights were grounded. 

To accommodate the directed energy beams, a particular chemical mix had been laid in the atmosphere over New York City. Billy Hayes “The HAARP Man” told me that “cooking” a heavy chemical spray of barium nitrate, aluminum oxide, and ferrous oxide [Ba(NO3 )2 + AlO2 + Fe3O2 + O] can result in compounds that become highly RF (radio frequency) reactive in a suspension of RR-144 and RR-129 chaffs. 16 When “cooked” with specific amino acids and nano-silicon particulates, mini-synthetic ruby crystals are formed, which, with specific aminoglycosides, can cause multiple myeloma, a very rare blood plasma cancer. Quantities of such synthetic ruby crystals were found in the lungs of those who jumped from the Towers, and multiple myelomas were found among first responders: 

Many types of cancers have been reported, including leukemia and the rare disease called multiple myeloma. . .Researchers associated with the World Trade Center Medical Monitoring and Treatment Program at the Mount Sinai School of Medicine examined many sick first responders. One result was that they found eight times the expected level of multiple myeloma in people below the age of 45. 17 

Eight times. Draw a line from the symptoms and illnesses listed in this one Foreign Policy Journal article to the typical biological fallout from the technology in my 2014 book Chemtrails, HAARP, and the Full Spectrum Dominance of Planet Earth (2014), then follow the chemicals conjured from jet engines and ionospheric heaters and you arrive at the resurrection of the SSS Space Fence here to finalize planetary lockdown. 

My journey into “national security” technology began with this one millennial crime perpetrated against three thousand souls, their families, our nation, and the future of humanity itself. —

ELANA FREELAND 

Olympia, Washington May 20, 2016 

Introduction

PLANETARY LOCKDOWN, GEOENGINEERING 

AND “THE DEEP STATE”

Just as, at the dawning of a new geological era, the whole world collapses in a gigantic crack, new mountains rise up while gaping abysses open up, and new plains and seas take shape, so will the present structure of Europe be capsized in an immense cataclysm. . .The only chance for Germany to resist this pressure will be to seize the initiative and take control of the inevitable upheaval from which will come a new dawning of history. 

— Hermann Rauschning, Hitler Speaks 

/ Voice of Destruction, 1939 

We’ve arranged a society on science and technology in which nobody understands anything about science and technology, and this combustible mixture of ignorance and power sooner or later is going to blow up in our faces. I mean, who is running the science and technology in a democracy if the people don’t know anything about it? 

— Carl Sagan to Charlie Rose, May 27, 1996 

Before leaving office, the 44th President issued a shot over the bow of the incoming President by striking the word “limited” from the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), thus publicly reinstating the “Star Wars” program of thirty-three years ago—and on Christmas Eve, no less. 

Republican Congressman Trent Franks, who introduced and shepherded the policy changes in the House, said he drew inspiration from former president Ronald Reagan’s Strategic Defense Initiative of the 1980s, which was intended to use lasers and other space-based weaponry to render nuclear weapons “impotent and obsolete.” Known as “Star Wars,” the initiative cost taxpayers US$30 billion, but no system was ever deployed. 1 

Eighteen days later, mainstream media began normalizing the geoengineering we’ve been undergoing for two decades in the name of “easing climate change.” 2 Since then, space news has been hot and heavy: in February, increased ozone over 3.5 million square miles of the Pacific Ocean and the Western U.S. (“the most unusual meteorological event we’ve had in decades”); 3 in March, “magnetized Rossby waves on the Sun” making it easier to “predict space weather much further in advance” (National Center for Atmospheric Research): 

On Earth, Rossby waves are associated with the path of the jet stream and the formation of low- and high-pressure systems, which in turn influence local weather events. 4 

In April, “Anthropogenic Weather” was finally admitted in Space Science Reviews — 

Anthropogenic effects on the space environment started in the late 19th century and reached their peak in the 1960s when high altitude nuclear explosions were carried out by the USA and the Soviet Union. These explosions created artificial radiation belts near Earth that resulted in major damages to several satellites. . .Other anthropogenic impacts on the space environment include chemical release experiments, high-frequency wave heating of the ionosphere and the interaction of VLF waves with the radiation belts . . . 5 (Emphasis added.) 

In May, NASA brazenly announced “a massive, human-made ‘barrier’ surrounding Earth,” a “humongous bubble we created out in space” deserving of “calling for a whole new geological epoch to be named after us.” 6 

Then on June 17, the AMC-9 satellite in geostationary orbit 36,000 kilometers above the Earth’s surface since 2003 lost contact with its Luxembourg-based SES telecommunications operator and began drifting and breaking up. Radar film footage of the moment revealed three orb-like objects flying near the AMC-9 in triangular formation with another orb following aft. 7 Space situational awareness concern disseminated to the public was about the breakup debris, not about a possible space attack. 8 

Thirteen days later, President Trump revived the National Space Council (to be led by Vice President Mike Pence), 9 after which the massive $696 billion NDAA passed the U.S. House of Representatives: 

Tucked in the bill is a proposal endorsed by House Armed Services Committee leaders to create a Space Corps as a new military branch under the umbrella of the Air Force. Rep. Mike Rogers, the Strategic Forces Subcommittee chairman who proposed the idea, argued that the Air Force was prioritizing its fighter jets over space, and a dedicated service was needed to stay ahead of China and Russia in what many see as the next frontier of warfare. 10 

The race to control space began in 1945 when Operation Paperclip 11 brought committed Nazi engineers, technicians, and scientists to the United States to engineer their wonders during the Hegelian ruse known to history as the Cold War. One example among the 10,000 Nazis who sought refuge in the U.S. was Arthur Rudolph, former colleague of Wernher von Braun, aerospace engineer and NASA director of the Marshall Space Flight Center. Rudolph had been director of the Mittelwerk underground rocket factory nicknamed “Dante’s Inferno” where 52,000 prisoners turned out 6,000 V-2 rockets. From 1951 to 1961, Rudolph worked for Martin Marietta in Waterton, Colorado. Initially in charge of R&D for the Pershing missile, Rudolph became an American citizen, headed the Saturn project for NASA, and received the Distinguished Service Award. In 1984, he renounced his U.S. citizenship and returned to Germany, having faithfully served the transfer of the Third Reich to the United States. In 1995, Martin Marietta merged with Lockheed Corporation to form Lockheed Martin. 

Thus it was through the military-industrial complex that the Trojan horse of amoral, cryptic Nazism entered the naïve, resource-rich United States. In short order, the National Security Act, formation of the CIA, and Cold War followed. Rockets, satellites, computers, MK-ULTRA brain engineering, and exotic propulsion craft thrust the twentieth century into the twenty-first century of a space age. 

The Space Age—Star Trek’s “final frontier”—began with the necessity of dominating airspace, the near space around the Earth, and weather. Military research into weather control was kept quiet throughout the Cold War while dire warnings about a “little ice age,” “greenhouse gases,” “desertification,” then “extreme weather,” “global warming,” and “climate change” due to carbons were released to keep the dollars flowing, along with showcase international conferences packed with Ph.D.s recommending expensive “solutions” under the rubric of geoengineering, the intentional human-directed manipulation of the Earth’s climatic systems (Stanford Environmental Law Journal). 

The truth is that weather was to be engineered as a “force multiplier” 12 for military operations discussed in my previous book Chemtrails, HAARP, and the Full Spectrum Dominance of Planet Earth: 

(1) Weather modification, 

(2) environmental / geophysical modification, 

(3) electromagnetic manipulation, 

(4) military full spectrum dominance, 

(5) biological manipulation, 

(6) intelligence / surveillance, and 

(7) detection / obscuration of exotic propulsion technology. 

This was independent scientist Clifford Carnicom’s list in his 2005 film Cloud Cover. Now that phase two of the ionospheric heater technology is being instituted—the Space Fence—I have re-configured his list to reflect some of the detail behind each operation. Hopefully, this book will fill in the rest. Remember: weather engineering is the sine qua non force multiplier that all the rest depend upon. (This list, too, will no doubt be reconfigured as our knowledge base grows.) 

WEATHER ENGINEERING / GEOENGINEERING 

• Chemical / electromagnetic creation of plasma cirrus cloud cover 

PLANETARY/ GEOPHYSICAL OPERATIONS 

•Manipulate the ionosphere to charge, build and steer storms over and around regions 

• Utilize droughts, floods, hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes for environmental modification and disaster capitalism profits 

•Earth harvesting for REITs (real estate investment trusts) • Sun simulation / solar experiments 13 

ELECTROMAGNETIC OPERATIONS 

• Ionization of the atmosphere 

• Plasma and antimatter “farming” 

• Man-made Birkeland currents, Alfvén “whistler” waves, rotating electrical fields (the Hutchison Effect), etc. 

• Holography 

• Exotic propulsion systems 

DIRECTED ENERGY WARFARE OPERATIONS (C4) 

• Scalar interferometry (ionospheric heaters, lasers / masers, particle beams, HPMs, etc.) 

• Cloaking 

• Detection / obscuration of exotic propulsion systems 

SURVEILLANCE / NEURAL OPERATIONS 

• Artificial intelligence (AI) 

• Remote neural monitoring (RNM) 

• EM targeting of populations and individuals 

• 5G access to DNA 

BIOLOGICAL / TRANSHUMANISM OPERATIONS 

• “Hive mind” Morgellons delivery 

• Nanoparticle delivery: sensors, microprocessors, other electro-optical technology 

• Remote genetic engineering of DNA 

• Replace Nature with virtual reality 

“CLIMATE CONTROL” 

The Federal Government has been involved for over 30 years in a number of aspects of weather modification, through activities of both the Congress and the executive branch. Since 1947, weather modification bills pertaining to research support, operations, policy studies, regulations, liabilities, activity reporting, establishment of panels and committees, and international concerns have been introduced in the Congress. There have been hearings on many of these proposed measures, and oversight hearings have also been conducted on pertinent ongoing programs. 14 

Infiltration and co-optation, compartmentalization, nondisclosure agreements, backroom deals, threats, bribes, skewed research, packed peer review committees, embedded international media—one can only marvel at the legerdemain it takes to steer international conferences, committees, publishing houses, news outlets, university and elementary school curricula so as to construct a vast global house of cards built on turning carbons, the building blocks of all of life, into the cause célèbre that explains away the fact that our atmosphere and weather are being modified by military manipulation of the ionosphere. Carbon taxes and emissions trading are quite the con, given that CO2 is not far above the minimum to sustain plant life 15 and nations should be increasing CO2 instead of being penalized for the CO2 they do have. 16 

But then, the emperor wears no clothes. The first congressional report on geoengineering did not appear in the U.S. Congress until October 2010, just before the moratorium against geoengineering issued by the 10th Conference of Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (COP10) in Nagoya, Japan— a moratorium the U.S. had no intention of ratifying. 17 Were the delegates from 193 nations aware that geoengineering had been going on in the U.S. and other NATO nations for well over a decade? 

Four months after the Nagoya moratorium, a geoengineered earthquake struck Japan. 

Since then, embedded media have ramped up weather confusion in the public mind, blaming cars and industrial pollutants while assiduously ignoring the greatest polluters and propagandists of all: the over- inflated American military and military-industrial-intelligence complex that runs it. In 2013, the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) basically admitted that solar radiation management (SRM) was already underway: “If SRM were terminated for any reason, there is high confidence that global surface temperatures would rise very rapidly to values consistent with the greenhouse gas forcing.” 18 

Greenhouse gas forcing is the least of our worries. What about a technological military in service to the Deep State now subjecting our atmosphere to full spectrum dominance? 

Now and then, scientists like CERN particle physicist Jasper Kirby 19 and NASA Goddard Space Flight Center heliophysicist Douglas E. Rowland (“There’s different kinds of chemtrails, as you probably know” 20 ) leak a tantalizing tidbit about what is really going on, but it is always tacitly ignored by mainstream media. An Italian senator calls for declassification of chemtrail documents, 21 a Cyprus agriculture and environment minister pledges to look into “chemtrails” a.k.a. aerial spraying 22—and then, nothing. 

Over and over again, agents and agencies near the hub of the “climate change” mafia (NASA, NOAA, EPA, IPCC, etc.) are caught lying, but embedded media roll on. NASA proclaimed July 2012 to be the hottest month on record and NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center agreed: the July 2012 temperature average of 77.6°F was 3.3°F above the twentieth-century average and 0.2°F above the previously warmest July of 1936 (during the Dust Bowl years). However, when meteorologist Anthony Watts checked NOAA data, he found July 1936 had been reinstated as the hottest month on record. “You can’t get any clearer proof of NOAA adjusting past temperatures,” Watts wrote. “This isn’t just some issue with gridding, or anomalies, or method, it is about NOAA not being able to present historical climate information of the United States accurately. . .This is not acceptable. It is not being honest with the public. It is not scientific. It violates the Data Quality Act.” 23 

David L. Lewis, Ph.D., a former microbiologist for the EPA’s Office of Research & Development, wrote in Science For Sale: How the Government Uses Powerful Corporations and Leading Universities to Support Government Policies, Silence Top Scientists, Jeopardize Our Health, and Protect Corporate Profits (Skyhorse Publishing, 2014) that EPA leadership consistently “mishandles science.” One bizarre incident among many: in 2003, former Acting Assistant Administrator Henry L. Longest II made mid-level EPA managers read management consultant Margaret Wheatley’s Turning to One Another, which urged environmentalists “to abandon Western science in favor of ‘New Science’. . .the ‘space of not knowing’ and the ‘abyss.’ While passing through the abyss, new scientists shed their religious beliefs and sexual inhibitions, then turn to one another.” 24 Managerial candidates were then required to fill out a confidential questionnaire about their promiscuity, religion, morality, and willingness to keep secrets. 

What exactly was the EPA up to in the Bush II years? What is the EPA, really? 

Beyond the usual arsenal of propaganda, manipulation of international convocations, sexual confessions to forge bonds of secrecy, and blackmailing nations with geoengineered weather threats, is the possibility of outright murder. U.S. Representative Dennis Kucinich (Ohio) fought hard for HR 2977, the 2001 Space Preservation Act “revised” and stalled in committee after committee before its final death. Were the deaths of Kucinich’s fifty-two-year-old younger brother (December 19, 2007) and his forty-eight-year-old sister (acute respiratory distress syndrome, November 12, 2008) natural? On August 9, 2010, U.S. Senator Ted Stevens (Alaska) was investigating HAARP at the request of Alaskan bush pilot Theron “Terry” Smith when their aircraft crashed, killing Stevens and Smith but not NASA administrator Sean O’Keefe, who was also on board. Smith’s son-in-law had been killed just days before in a C-17 crash at Elmendorf Air Force Base. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) blamed the crash on the pilot’s “temporary unresponsiveness for reasons that could not be established.” 25 

Strange purges are also underway. Canada has dismissed two thousand scientists and hundreds of programs that monitored smoke stack emissions, food inspections, oil spills, water quality, climate change, etc. while closing seven of the eleven Fisheries and Oceans libraries:

. . .a document classified as “secret” that was obtained by Postmedia News mentioned “culling of materials” as a main activity in the reduction of libraries. . .reports have emerged of books being strewn across floors and even piled into dumpsters. 26 

Thus it is that decades of subterfuge, manipulation, extreme weather experiments, murder and mayhem have preceded the present normalization of geoengineering, and all in full view of nations of citizens who no longer believe in their own perceptions and intuitions. With operational weather weapons and the Space Fence in place, globalists are ready to further subject nations to the will of the United Nations instrument. 

THE UN POWER SHIFT 

The participation of the U.S. and China is significant, as the two account for more than 40 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions. The agreement goes into force once 55 countries accounting for at least 55 percent of global emissions officially sign. . .Parties to the agreement will still have to go through the process of joining the agreement, which for most will require processes of approval in their home countries . . . 27 

On Earth Day 2016, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change agreement was signed after being hammered out at multiple conferences culminating in the COP21 in Paris (November 30– December 11, 2015). The 2011 UN Climate Change Conference (COP17) in Durban, South Africa had attempted to include an International Tribunal of Climate Justice provision, 28 but by COP21, it was no more. 

It was quite a show. Climate mouthpieces had been carefully chosen—the IPCC, geoengineers David Keith and Ken Caldeira, prestigious university Phd's, embedded NGOs, government agencies, the World Bank and IMF, and of course the usual Wall Street-London deep pockets. Scriptwriters worked overtime on the fate of the Earth as cameras panned in on lightning flashes, rolling storms, deluges and droughts, crying babies, hospital emergency rooms filled to overflowing. . .The UN was to be tasked with vast new tax and regulatory powers in the name of keeping global warming below 2°C. 

A quieter UN meeting had taken place in New York City two months before COP21: the Sustainable Development Summit concentrating on UN Agenda 2030 (Agenda 21 renamed) that would coordinate with the carbons scam to turn nationhood into a mere environmental address: 

To cheers, applause and probably a tinge of relief, the 17 global goals that will provide the blueprint for the world’s development over the next 15 years were ratified by UN member states in New York on Friday. After speeches from Pope Francis and the Nobel laureate Malala Yousafzai, and songs from Shakira and Angelique Kidjo, the ambitious agenda — which aims to tackle poverty, climate change and inequality for all people in all countries — was signed off by 193 countries at the start of a three-day UN summit on sustainable development . . . The global goals summit continues until Sunday, after which all eyes will be on the UN climate talks in November. Asked if the goals will be scuppered without a strong deal in Paris [COP21], Mogens Lykketoft, the president of the UN general assembly, was hesitant, saying leaders were making more commitments than they were in previous COP meetings. “From what we know and hope for, we will be approaching a better deal.” 29 

Weather warfare technology was the teeth Agenda 2030 had been waiting for (and surely why developing nations had sought to include an International Tribunal of Climate Justice). Immediately after the two conferences, the Dutch Defence Joint Meteorological Group (JMG) took the lead “in providing weather forecasts for every exercise or deployment of [NATO’s] Very High Readiness Joint Task Force (VJTF).” 30 “Weather forecasts” were duly added to the Orwellian dictionary. 

To be fair, some academics have pondered how exactly the naked emperor will remove CO2 from the atmosphere “using an infrastructure we don’t have and with technology that won’t work on the scale we need, and finally to store it in places we can’t find” 31? Many see the carbon solution for what it is: a ploy for raking in disaster capitalist cash—$90 trillion in energy infrastructure investments, $1 trillion green bond market, multi-trillion-dollar carbon trading market, $391 billion climate finance industry. 32 The UN Green Climate Fund alone will clear $100 billion per year, purportedly to support concrete carbons mitigation in developing countries, but will the money ever make it to those nations after filtering through multilateral and private banks like World Bank and Deutsche Bank 33? After all, the naked emperor is not known for keeping his promises . . . 

Traditional bureaucratic foundations like Ford, Rockefeller and Carnegie were said to be giving way to “philanthrocapitalism,” a muscular new approach to charity in which the presumed entrepreneurial skills of billionaires would be applied to the world’s most pressing challenges . . . 34 

Hopefully, like the slow and steady tortoise that wins the race, the public is awakening to the dismal fact that its institutions, agencies, universities, laboratories, and courts obey the very powers that have milked public assets dry. Worker and food safety, gone. Bill of Rights, gone. Environmental protections, gone. Soon, the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) or facsimiles thereof will lock in corporate feudalism under oligarchic world rule as billionaire Good Club 35 members establish more and more “brain institutes” to support Brain Initiative neuroscience in service to a Transhumanist future. 36 

“SCIENCE IS BROKEN” 

For two decades, independent scientists and the science-minded have been attempting to sound the alarm regarding what is going on in our skies and low-earth orbit as university lab scientists buckle to military grants intent on weaponizing everything under the Sun, if not the Sun itself. Rutgers University climatologist Alan Robock relates how CIA-funded consultants asked him two questions: If we control someone else’s climate, would they know about it? and Would climate experts be able to determine if another nation was attempting to control the climate? The CIA—not exactly known for being forthcoming—has funded multiple grants, National Academy of Sciences reports like “Climate Intervention: Carbon Dioxide Removal and Reliable Sequestration” (154 pages) and “Climate Intervention: Reflecting Sunlight to Cool Earth” (234 pages), 37 and defense contractors (Raytheon, Lockheed Martin, L3, SAIC, etc.) to aggressively do whatever it takes to quietly develop geoengineering and the Space Fence while keeping the public ignorant of both—especially when it comes to those pesky chemtrails activists. From CIA Document 1035-960: 

(3)(b) To employ propaganda assets to [negate] and refute the attacks of the critics. Book reviews and feature articles are particularly appropriate for this purpose. The unclassified attachments to this guidance should provide useful background material for passing to assets. Our ploy should point out, as applicable, that the critics are (I) wedded to theories adopted before the evidence was in, (II) politically interested, (III) financially interested, (IV) hasty and inaccurate research, or (V) infatuated with their own theories. 38 

It should therefore not be surprising to learn that the peer review system has been co-opted to banish those theories and scientists who don’t “play ball” to the outer darkness of non-publication, stonewalled careers, and worse. Nobel Laureate biologist Sydney Brenner: 

I think peer review is hindering science. In fact, I think it has become a completely corrupt system. It’s corrupt in many ways, in that scientists and academics have handed over to the editors of these journals the ability to make judgment on science and scientists. There are universities in America, and I’ve heard from many committees, that won’t consider people’s publications in low impact factor journals. . .it puts the judgment in the hands of people who really have no reason to exercise judgment at all. And that’s all been done in the aid of commerce, because they are now giant organizations making money out of it. 39 

“Powerful orthodoxy against a marginalized heterodoxy” is how Charles Eisenstein describes the opposition to cutting-edge Electric Universe scientists: 

If you have faith in the soundness of our scientific institutions, you will assume that the dissidents are marginalized for very good reason: their work is substandard. If you believe that the peer review process is fair and open, then the dearth of peer-reviewed citations for [Electric Universe] research is a damning indictment of their theory. And if you believe that the corpus of mainstream physics is fundamentally correct, and that science is progressing closer and closer to truth, you will be highly skeptical of any major departure from standard theories. . .Can we trust scientific consensus? Can we trust the integrity of our scientific institutions? Perhaps not. Over the last few years, a growing chorus of insider critics have been exposing serious flaws in the ways that scientific research is funded and published, leading some to go so far as to say, “Science is broken.” 40 

Between 1973 and 2013, six major publishers decided which scientific papers merited publication and which didn’t (ACS; Reed Elsevier; Sage; Taylor & Francis; Springer; and Wiley-Blackwell). All were in the back pocket of Big Pharma and the medical industry, which, like the CIA, NASA, EPA, etc., are not what they seem: 

“As long as publishing in high impact factor journals is a requirement for researchers to obtain positions, research funding, and recognition from peers, the major commercial publishers will maintain their hold on the academic publishing system,” added [Professor Vincent Lariviere, lead author of the study from the University of Montreal’s School of Library and Information Science]. 41 

The danger quotient for scientists working on classified projects is greater than just being stripped of their career and livelihood. In the early days of the “Star Wars” Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) now culminating in the Space Fence, two dozen scientists and experts working for Marconi and Plessey Defence Systems either disappeared or died under “mysterious circumstances.” Most were microbiologists. The scientist death toll continued into the 1990s and post-9/11. 42 Now, the targets appear to be naturopathic doctors and health-minded MDs peering behind the curtains of Big Pharma vaccinations, autism, and cancer-for-profit. 43 

NEXT STOP: THE SSS SPACE FENCE 

We are a long way from President Kennedy’s Space Age dreams and resolution to put an end to chemical polluters and the destruction of soil and biodiversity. Former U.S. Secretary of Defense Ashton B. Carter had a doctorate in physics from Oxford University, and with the stroke of a presidential pen on Thanksgiving 2015, the U.S. Commercial Space Launch Competitiveness Act (HR 2262) a.k.a. Space Act of 2015 thumbed its nose at the Outer Space Treaty of 1967 and erased whatever fleeting separation was left between the militarizing of space and corporations bent on making profits from space-based mining of asteroids and the helium-3 isotope on the Moon. 

Now that weather can be technically engineered, it is no longer an environmental issue but a political and economic one. Take, for instance, the North American Climate, Clean Energy, and Environment Partnership Action Plan signed in June 2016 by Canada, the U.S., and Mexico. The “sustainable future” for these three nations appears to be as some sort of geographic hemispheric union, as prophesied by Hillary Clinton in 2013. 44 The Partnership Action Plan Leaders Statement describes it like this: 

Our actions to align climate and energy policies will protect human health and help level the playing field for our businesses, households, and workers. . .that sets us firmly on the path to a more sustainable future. 45 

In Orwellian, “protect human health” translates to Big Pharma vaccinations for all, and “level the playing field” to the evaporating middle class, while sustainable future is something like the “free-range totalitarianism” coined by investment analyst Catherine Austin Fitts—cheaper by far than rounding people up in camps. 

And what are we to believe and not believe about the terra incognita of space, now that U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman General Henry H. Shelton has confessed that a crucial component of the military doctrine of full spectrum dominance is the use of deception to “defend decision-making processes by neutralizing an adversary’s perception management and intelligence collection efforts” 46? In 2015, the twin LIGOs (Laser Interferometer-Gravitational wave Observatory) were said to have detected a gravitational wave generated by two merging black holes at a distance of 1.3 billion light years. 47 But do “gravitational waves” and “black holes” even exist? And what were the asteroid-type objects near Uranus that the ALMA (Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array) telescope in Chile detected? 48 

Meanwhile on planet Earth, the price tag for the American military machine in 2016 was $573 billion (not counting the “black budget”), and propaganda continues to frame extreme weather as “acts of God” due to “climate change,” while the truth is that weather events are being generated by exceedingly sophisticated electromagnetic technology. Hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, floods, and droughts dominate world news, with FEMA and military security forces descending upon one shattered community after another, real estate agents brokering giveaway property purchases in the wake of disaster after disaster, and insurance companies suing towns for failure to prepare for “climate change.” 49 

Geoengineering is a profit-maker for disaster capitalists and a force-multiplier for the military. 

The SSS (Space Surveillance System) Space Fence has been constructed by NATO interests. It is a global surveillance machine with many parts above and below the firmament to provide real full spectrum dominance not just of weather and the near-earth environment but of the entire biosphere down to the DNA level—for generations. 

But despite it all, we must continue to educate ourselves regarding the wireless antenna atmosphere we now breathe and learn how the Star Wars II Space Fence operates for the sake of our own survival and that of the generations still coming. Hopefully, Under An Ionized Sky: From Chemtrails to Space Fence Lockdown will give you a leg up as to how the present Space Age has been quietly built around and in us for the sake of a Transhumanist Space Age.

Few in the civil sector fully understand that geoengineering is primarily a military science and has nothing to do with either cooling the planet or lowering carbon emissions. While seemingly fantastical, weather has been weaponized. At least four countries—U.S., Russia, China and Israel— possess the technology and organization to regularly alter weather and geologic events for various military and black operations, which are tied to secondary objectives, including demographic, energy and agricultural resource management. 

Indeed, warfare now includes the technological ability to induce, enhance or direct cyclonic events, earthquakes, drought and flooding, including the use of polymerized aerosol viral agents and radioactive particulates carried through global weather systems. Various themes in public debate, including global warming, have unfortunately been subsumed into much larger military and commercial objectives that have nothing to do with broad public environmental concerns. These include the gradual warming of polar regions to facilitate naval navigation and resource extraction. 

— Matt Andersson, former executive adviser, 

aerospace & defense, Booz Allen Hamilton, Chicago 

CHAPTER ONE 

Project Cloverleaf 

Controlling the weather has been a goal of industrialists for 150 years or more. But it was not until the availability of vast numbers of jet aircraft that made it possible to replace huge sections of the atmosphere with chemicals to control the flow of air and moisture. This is not advanced technology but more like farming the sky with a million tractors. True advanced technology would not require aerosols to produce “climate change.” It’s brute force climate manipulation for which secrecy cannot be maintained without threatening the potential whistleblower. Now that the public has increasingly realized the climate change cover-up, the media looks more and more foolish in their attempt to protect the masters. 

— Harold Saive, chemtrailplanet.net 

As early as 1990, weather force specialists at the U.S. Air Force Academy were hard at work studying how to chemically mix and lay “aerial obscuration” they called “chemtrails.” Project Cloverleaf began quietly enough (as all classified projects do) with the 1994 Hughes Aircraft patent for Welsbach Seeding For Reduction of Global Warming. Welsbach seeding called for spreading highly reflective materials in the atmosphere to reflect back into space 1–2 percent of incoming sunlight and thus slow down “global warming.” However, it was also about beginning to create a more conductive atmosphere in preparation for Bernard Eastlund’s High-frequency Active Auroral Research Project (HAARP) already under construction in Alaska. The reflective material (~10 microns) to be added to jet auxiliary fuel tanks was the highly conductive compound aluminum oxide (Al2O3 ). The jet’s main tanks would be reserved for takeoff and landing, and the auxiliary loaded with Al2O3 for cruising altitude. Lawrence Livermore National Labs priced the program at US$1 billion per annum (in 1994 dollars). 

By the late 1990s, aerial grids were being laid over chosen regions and cities of the U.S. and other NATO nations. In 1996, the military went public with two documents that obliquely referenced what Cloverleaf was up to: the Pentagon paper “Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025” in Air Force 2025, 1 which called the chemical whitening effect “cirrus shielding”; and U.S. Space Command’s Vision for 2020 calling for full spectrum dominance of space, land, sea, and air. 2 

Air traffic controllers (ATC) at major airports were coached to re-route commercial air traffic around military craft engaged in “classified aerial operations” at 37,000–40,000 feet. ATC radar revealed a haze of aluminum and barium—Al2O3 for solar radiation management (SRM) geoengineering, barium stearate Ba(C18H35O2 )2 for lubrication, radar imaging, and high-powered RF-microwave beam weapons. 

A wide range of particles could be released into the stratosphere to achieve the SRM objective of scattering sunlight back to space. Sulfates and nanoparticles currently favored for SRM include sulfur dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, carbonyl sulfide, black carbon, and specially engineered discs composed of metallic aluminum, aluminum oxide and barium titanate. In particular, engineered nanoparticles are considered very promising. The particles would utilize photophoretic and electromagnetic forces to self-levitate above the stratosphere. These nanoparticles would remain suspended longer than sulfate particles, would not interfere with stratospheric chemistry, and would not produce acid rain. However, while promising, the self-levitating nanodisc has not been tested to verify efficacy, may increase ocean acidification due to atmospheric CO2 entrapment, has uncharacterized human health and environmental impacts, and may be prohibitively expensive. 3 

The truth is that the 10 billion SRM discs 10 micrometers across and 50 nanometers thick are engineered with a core of aluminum, a top layer of aluminum oxide, and a bottom layer of barium titanate —aluminum to reflect heat up, heavier barium purportedly to push the discs up (photophoresis). Introduce a magnetic component, then spray, and the nanoparticles will follow the Earth’s magnetic field into the upper atmosphere. 

By 1998, the Ontario Ministry of Environment (Canada) found 7X the safe limit for aluminum in rainwater samples. More and more citizens complained of sudden headaches, joint pains, dizziness, fatigue, acute asthma, gastrointestinal pain, coughs, and feverless flu symptoms. 

In 2000, Cloverleaf went public in an offhand way with a comment from an anonymous airline executive to independent scientist Clifford Carnicom, then the most visible scientist collecting data on the aerosol fallout over northern New Mexico. According to this “Deep Throat,” the purpose of Cloverleaf was “to allow commercial airlines to assist in releasing these chemicals into the atmosphere.” 4 Military jets simply could not keep up with the “global dimming” now called solar radiation management (SRM), so the entire airline industry was being drafted in the name of national security. 

THE IONOSPHERIC HEATERS 

The deeper one probes Project Cloverleaf technology, the more obvious it becomes that cosmic processes are being manipulated and employed. For example, Eastlund’s last patent, published on October 11, 2007, claims that HF ionospheric heaters can create artificial plasma 5 regions in the atmosphere by means of cosmic particle ignition—sort of like “hot spots”—utilizing “ionization trails of cosmic rays and micrometeors,” thus lowering the power requirements for telecommunications, weather control, lightning protection, and defense applications. 6 Dam up one of the five atmospheric rivers of vapor in each hemisphere—rivers 420–480 miles wide, two miles above the Earth—and move 340 pounds of water per second toward the poles. Convert the flow to electricity and steer the jet stream to dump masses of rain on a pre-designated geographic area, such as Storm Frank in England in December 2015. 7 

Even the Sun can be influenced: 

. . .the HF modulation transmitted by HAARP in the ionosphere causes an Alfvén (whistler) wave generation, which in turn creates an ELF harmonic in the Earth’s atmosphere. This Alfvén wave generation can also induce solar activity due to the quantum vibration (sympathetic resonance) between the two bodies. This is exactly what Tesla was referring to when he stated, man could tap the Breast of Mother Sun and release her energy toward Earth as needed—magnetic as well as light.” We’re seeing the future. 8 

But then, there may be blowback chalked up to “climate change”: 

It’s as if global warming were ringing the Earth’s atmosphere like some great, cacophonous alarm bell. The upper level zonal winds are swinging wildly from record high positive anomalies to record low negative anomalies. . .And the Jet Stream now has redefined all boundaries—flowing at times from the East Siberian Sea in the Arctic across the Equator and all the way south to West Antarctica. 9 

Today, we can count more than 260 SDI-inspired installations around the world, all engaged, to one degree or another, in ULF/ELF modulation and manipulation of the ionospheric fluctuation known as the auroral jet (electrojet), where the Van Allen Radiation Belts—the shell of our magnetosphere—intersect our atmosphere. Even before Project Cloverleaf was activated and HAARP built, a network of ionospheric heaters already existed. 

The first ionospheric heaters like the Arecibo Radio Telescope (“The Pit”) in Puerto Rico (1963), the Platteville Atmospheric Observatory in Platteville, Colorado, and EISCAT (European Incoherent Scatter Scientific Association) in Tromsø, Norway (1981) initially concentrated on interfering high-frequency radio waves for earth-penetrating tomography. The Pit is still the largest dish antenna in the world with three radar transmitters with an ERP of 20 TW10 at 2380 MHz, 2.5 TW (pulse peak) at 430MHz, and 300MW at 47 MHz. 

Just before HAARP was shut down in summer 2013, the Pit ionospheric heater was upgraded: 

“It is basically the same as HAARP for the science, except that HAARP was in the Auroral Region, where the physics of the ionosphere is quite different with all the energetic particles and magnetic fields,” Penn State Electrical Engineering Professor Jim Breakall, WA3FET, told ARRL. . .The National Science Foundation and Cornell University, which previously operated Arecibo Observatory, contracted with Penn State’s Electrical Engineering Department to construct the “new and enhanced” HF ionospheric instrument. It will be used to study the interaction between HF radio energy and ionospheric plasma. 11 

The Platteville Observatory supposedly shut down in 1984 and is now being used for “wind profiling.” EISCAT oversees three incoherent scatter radar systems at 224 MHz and 931 MHz in Northern Scandinavia, and one at 500MHz at EISCAT Space Centre in Svalbard. Additional receiver stations are located in Sodankylä, Finland and Kiruna, Sweden, transmitting 10MW with an antenna gain of 35 decibels (dB) producing an ERP of 32 billion watts. EISCAT is funded and operated by research institutes and councils of Norway, Sweden, Finland, Japan, China, the UK, France, and Germany, 12 and has recently been recalibrated to serve lower-earth orbit (LEO) Space Fence surveillance. 

As for how ionospheric heaters work, picture focused radio waves generated by phased-array radar units striking a targeted area in the ionosphere to ionize (heat) electrons. HAARP’s ionospheric research instrument (IRI) was constructed with 180 antenna towers in a grid of fifteen columns and twelve rows, with two dipole antennas atop each tower. Beneath the array are transmitter shelters, each housing twelve diesel-powered transmitters capable of generating 10,000 watts of RF power each with an ability to focus 3.6 billion watts on a single point. Steering this focus and its pulse transmission agility constitutes the secret power of HAARP, according to Eastlund. 

Once the electrons in the ionosphere are ionized, they twirl down the magnetic lines of force conjoining with Birkeland currents, ready to be steered by various radar instruments for a variety of military-industrial-intelligence C4 operations (command, control, communications, and cyberwarfare), including moving and enhancing weather systems, stimulating seismic plates to generate earthquakes, tomographic penetration of regions of the Earth for mineral or oil exploitation, discovery of underground installations, etc. 

The process is not unlike sonar’s ability to produce a radar-like echo. Tune the ground mechanism— the phased-array antennas laid out in a hexagonal grid following large copper cables buried underground —to produce a standing sky wave that will echo back as a ground wave to be steered and relayed for military operations. HAARP’s IRI was thus able to create a “virtual antenna” in the sky called an Ionospheric Alfvén Resonator (IAR). Properly activated, Alfvén waves (whistlers) 13 and magnetosonic (MS) waves in the magnetosphere create a standing wave between the ionosphere and our troposphere that radiates extremely low frequency (ELF) signals around the globe—signals that can be heard in the deepest depths of the oceans. 14 This resonance of standing oscillations “behave as strings with the ends fixed in the ionosphere.” 15 (Thus, the acronym HAARP.) By constantly priming our atmosphere with conductive metal particulates, a virtual antenna for C4 military operations is thus maintained. 

Compare a Space Fence around the Earth with NASA’s plan to build a de facto magnetosphere around Mars to protect it from solar wind and debris until a new atmosphere forms. 16 Referencing a 2002 paper, 17 Chris Fontenot says NASA’s plan for Mars is entirely possible, thanks to Alfvén waves: 

This technology involves Alfvén wave modulation via HF perturbation by ionospheric heaters located around our planet. The notion of increasing the magnetic field of Mars through a similar process isn’t far-fetched in the least. These Alfvén waves are responsible for Earth’s magnetic field strength: a naturally occurring process normally fueled by solar activity. 

HAARP created the consummate standing sky wave. In HAARP’s backyard, Nick Begich and Jeane Manning explained it twenty years ago in Angels Don’t Play This HAARP: 

This invention provides the ability to put unprecedented amounts of power in the Earth’s atmosphere at strategic locations and to maintain the power injection level, particularly if random pulsing is employed, in a manner far more precise and better controlled than heretofore accomplished by the prior art. . .The goal is to learn how to manipulate the ionosphere on a more grand scale than the Soviet Union could do with its similar facilities. HAARP is the largest ionospheric heater in the world, located at a latitude most conducive to putting Eastlund’s invention into practice. 18 [Emphasis added.] 

In fact, HAARP’s effective radiative power (ERP) is so great that when its beam intersects with just one other ionospheric heater beam in the Schumann resonance range of 7–8Hz, the entire ionosphere “rings.” 

Between HAARP’s closure in 2013 and reopening in 2015, 19 its IRI phased array was re-calibrated to synchronize with the vast ground-based network being tuned to resonate with the Space Fence infrastructure, from ionospheric heaters (including many now mobile 20 ) to ELF receivers, digital HF ionosondes, magnetometers, photometers, VLF sounders and VHF riometers, HF receivers, HF/VHF radars, optical imagers, rockets with “particle beams and accelerators aboard (e.g., EXCEDE and CHARGE IV), and shuttle- or satellite-borne RF transmitters (e.g., WISP and ACTIVE),” and sounding rockets probing heated regions of the ionosphere and dropping “chemical releases” for “space-based efforts.” 21 

The June 6, 1995 “HAARP Research and Applications Executive Summary” 22 put out by the Technical Information Division of the Naval Research Laboratory makes it clear that HAARP was always about the military commitment to controlling the ionosphere so as to generate plasma “lenses” 23 capable of focusing large amounts of HF energy at high altitude, triggering ionospheric processes in the lower atmosphere, etc. Drawing powering ions from the upper into the lower atmosphere was exactly what the 1980s SDI program lacked.

The heart of the program will be the development of a unique ionospheric heating capability to conduct the pioneering experiments required to adequately assess the potential for exploiting ionospheric enhancement technology for DOD (Dept. of Defense) purposes. . .Such a research facility will provide the means for investigating the creation, maintenance, and control of a large number and wide variety of ionospheric processes that, if exploited, could provide significant operational capabilities and advantages over conventional C3 systems. . . 

By exploring the properties of the auroral ionosphere as an active, non-linear medium, the primary energy of the HF transmitter which is confined to a frequency range of 2.8 to 10 MHz can be down-converted to infra-red and visible photons. As a result, the HAARP HF transmitter can generate sources for remote sensing and communications spanning sixteen decades 24 in frequency. 25 [Emphasis added.] 

“Sixteen orders of magnitude” point to HAARP’s unique power for manifold operations. As Jerry Smith (1950–2010) commented in HAARP: The Ultimate Weapon: 

This shows the deliberate misdirection of the current HAARP literature, which does all it can to downplay the true power of this transmitter in terms of what it can affect. By being able to rebroadcast anywhere in the non-ionizing (non-radioactive) segment of the electromagnetic spectrum, with a potential re-radiated broadcast power equal to, if not greater than, all the TV and radio stations of the world combined, the HAARP array is utterly in a class of its own. Frankly, its potential exceeds the imaginations of many science fiction writers working today. 26 

In summary, with 1.7 gigawatts (billions) ERP and a frequency range of 1–15 MHz (millions), HAARP was able to turn the electrojet 27 into a virtual antenna with radio wave “mirrors” (ionospheric lenses) for long-range, over-the-horizon HF/VHF/UHF operations. With the lower atmosphere ionized, all the military had to do was tune the HAARP instrument with one or two other radar beams at other longitudes / latitudes, lay “chaff” loaded with conductive metal nanoparticulates, and whip up a hurricane, earthquake, drought, or flood—or even a directed energy event like 9/11. 

In Chemtrails, HAARP, and the Full Spectrum Dominance of Planet Earth, I discuss a few such “acts of God.” Over the past two decades, hundreds of experiments have been conducted under cover of “global warming” and “climate change.” For example, Hurricane Sandy on October 29, 2012, a real Halloween superstorm that inflicted $71 billion in damage on the Ports of New York and New Jersey and killed 159 people. Sandy’s size and path were “unusual”: 

After moving north from the tropical waters where it spawned, Sandy turned out to sea before hooking back west, growing in size and crashing head-on into the East Coast, gaining strength when it merged with an eastbound mid-latitude storm. . .“These events are somewhat rare in occurrence, but they do exist in nature,” [William Lau, research scientist at University of Maryland’s Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center and senior scientist emeritus at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center] said. “While they’re turning about each other, they interact. One just took the energy from the other.” 28 

Sandy’s “turn out to sea” was to pick up more power from a storm system created in the South Atlantic and pinned offshore for the occasion. Sandy provided the model for dozens of generously funded simulations at NASA Goddard to study what thus far had been learned from Project Stormfury—for example, how warmer ocean-generated storms are 50–160 percent more destructive than Sandy. 29

Three years to the month after Sandy was built off the Atlantic coast, Hurricane Patricia was built off the Pacific coast; in February 2016 Cyclone Winston devastated Fiji as the most potent cyclone on record in the southwest Pacific; in April 2016 Cyclone Fantala was the strongest known storm in the Indian Ocean. 

NBC News hailed Patricia as “the strongest storm ever measured.” Mexico was warned of possible thirty-nine-foot waves, flash floods, and mudslides, and 15,000 tourists were evacuated from Puerto Vallarta to Jalisco state before the storm made landfall. On Friday, October 23, Patricia’s cyclonic winds were at a frenzied pitch. The sea surged, the rain poured. Four hours after landfall and still moving east, Patricia dropped from a Category 5 to a Category 1, with much of the moisture that would have fed Patricia electromagnetically sent north and east up to Oregon, Washington, and Idaho. Oregonian Ann Fillmore, Ph.D., described it this way while viewing a satellite map: 

. . .first the storm system that appeared on radar to be coming over OR/WA was shown to have more umph and wet stuff in it than the hurricane heading into Mexico. It has literally exploded with rain over NE Washington and Idaho, or so radar says. Now watch what should have been an instant pop-up hurricane off the Mexican coast. Yes! It is there, and then it is not there. Even the rain in it is gone. The rain that is now heading into TX is really not an extension of the so-called hurricane. It is simply another popup storm generated over the desert of Mexico. There are other small ‘hurricane-like’ entities over the Pacific, but they seem to be stuck in one spot. I’m surprised the guys who made all of this bizarre stuff didn’t sign their names to it. Superbly done, guys! Wow! 30 

Texas and Louisiana prepared for Patricia to be amped up by El Niño, the jetstream lobe, and warm moisture from the Gulf of Mexico. But when Patricia moved past Guadalajara, she just—died. Was Patricia about powering a hurricane up in the presence of El Niño, then stopping it dead in its tracks? 

THE DELIVERY SYSTEMS 

I draw your attention to the little known fact that particulate plumes can also increase the regional surface temperature at great distances from the plume, which is a totally counterintuitive result in that particulates reduce the level of solar radiation reaching the Earth’s surface and would be expected to have a cooling effect. The CCS Program however states that by the year 2100 short-lived gases and particles may account for as much as 40 percent of the warming over the summertime continental United States. 

— Geophysicist Keith Potts, COP21 

Like a vast, random experiment targeting the environment with health doomed to be collateral damage, chemicals have been released into the air, soil, and water since nineteenth-century industrialism. While some may shrug that the aerial release of chemical nanoparticles and nano-sensors, microprocessors, and biologicals under the classified Project Cloverleaf is just more of the same, nanoparticles able to breach the blood-brain barrier make it uniquely diabolical, as does the global conspiracy of power to turn the entire planet into an electromagnetic grid and plug everyone into it. War has gone corporate and all of life reframed as a battlespace of disposable noncombatants (civilians) redefined as potential “terrorists.” The military is no longer a protector but partnered with giant transnational corporations and wealthy dynastic cartels like that of Big Pharma and Big Oil. 

Fertilizers and pesticides, bombs, “medicine,” and jet fuel additives all flow from the self-serving chemical industry of Dow, Monsanto, Siemens, Eli Lilly, Sandoz, Bayer, I.G. Farben, etc. During World War II, I.G. Farben provided nickel, aluminum, and magnesium for Nazi Heinkel and Junkers Stuka bombers, along with fuel, oil, and phosphorous incendiaries. 31 Today, they support chemical warfare against society. Monsanto developed its aluminum-resistant “Terminator” seed in step with the Welsbach patent and Cloverleaf jets furrowing the sky and sowing Al2O3 combustion chemicals in soil, oceans, rivers, water reservoirs, gills and lungs. Big Pharma corporations boost cancer, legislate for more vaccinations, and pay off physicians to ply Americans with one drug after another. Like Monsanto seed, fertilizers, and pesticides, “mood stabilizers” and vaccines are designed to work synergistically with the chemicals and nanoparticulates falling from the sky. Profit and population control go hand in hand. 

CHEMTRAILS VERSUS CONTRAILS 

Our blue skies and golden Sun have turned milky white as the disconnect between what people are observing and what television weather reporters are reading from their cue cards slowly becomes more and more obvious. Occasionally, a scientist admits that what is ridiculed by media is actually true—for example, heliophysicist at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Doug Rowland admitted over the phone to a citizen: “There’s different kinds of chemtrails, as you probably know.” 32 The question is not if chemicals are in the aerial deliveries but what chemicals are being delivered and why, and what impact they’re having on present-time health and the genetics of future generations. 

We stand six miles below what is spewing from the engine and wings of jets and strain our eyes to capture what is coming from the jet to obscure our sunlight and deep blue skies. We read about “climate change,” contrails, and carbons, follow “extreme weather” coverage on television, and ponder references to stratospheric aerosol geoengineering (SAG) or solar radiation management (SRM). In 2010, European aerospace engineers presented conclusive evidence of chemical trails over NATO countries in “CASE ORANGE,” a 336-page report commissioned by The Belfort Group. American mainstream media buried it to keep pilots who frequent sites like boldmethod.com ignorant of more than two kinds of contrails: the aerodynamic and exhaust contrails. But if “contrails are ‘condensation trails,’ and they have nothing to do with chemicals,” 33 what about the fact that at least 2 percent of all commercial and military JP-8 fuel is made up of chemical additives? 

The truth is that Cloverleaf is so highly compartmentalized and percentages of fuel formulae so highly classified that even pilots and drone operators have no real idea of why and what they are releasing. 

The U.S. Air Force distance standard for condensation trails is one-wingspan behind the aircraft, whereas chemical trails begin straight out of the engine compartment. Contrails form at 35,000+ feet at a temperature of -40°C with 67+ percent humidity, whereas chemtrails are generally laid between 28,000 and 34,000 feet, with cargo delivery flights like FedEx above them. Military pilots in pressure suits streak above them all at 39,000+ feet. Given that most chemtrail sightings are of low- and mid-altitude jets, the assumption that kerosene is turning into ice crystals is impossible. 

According to the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colorado, the only way to form artificial clouds in warm dry air is to introduce enough particulates into the atmosphere to attract and accrete all available moisture into a visible vapor. Once airborne particles like barium or aluminum are added to create more nuclei for atmospheric moisture to condense around in low-humidity areas, droplets will freeze into persistent plumes at much lower altitudes (and higher temperatures). After acclimation, ice crystals in contrails disappear. Look up and study the clouds and you will see that the cloud cover and bizarrely shaped clouds do not acclimate. This is because they are not from contrails but are from chemicalized trails. 

JET ENGINES 

One burning question of chemical trail students is what is coming directly from the combustion engine and what is being added through modifications to the pylon nozzles above and behind the exhaust output? 

In “How Persistent Aerosol Plumes are Being Changed to Short Non-Persistent Plumes to Fool the Public,” chemically sensitive activist Russ Tanner (globalskywatch.com) suggests that “the contrail deception” depends upon the public remaining ignorant of just how jet engines work: 

. . .multiple professional airline pilots have contacted me and thanked me for my stance against the contrail deception. All of them told me personally that they have never seen trails come out of jet engines and that they appreciate my work exposing the disinformation about contrails. Every one of these pilots knew that contrails are so rare that most people will never see one in their lifetime, and if they do occur, they are at high altitudes that cannot be seen from the ground. These professional pilots have flown most of their lives and have always had a deep interest in aviation. Some of them fly mainstream commercial jets while others fly large jets for major parcel carriers. 34 

NASA sponsors countless studies of “subsonic aircraft exhaust” and “natural and anthropogenic upper troposphere particles, laboratory studies of ice nucleation and soot particles, and numerical modeling of the formation of cirrus altered by exhaust soot particles.” 35 A 2008 patent Abstract posits that control of terrestrial climate “relies mainly on civilian airlines burning. . .sun-shading (sun-blocking / sun reflective) fuels in the high levels of the atmosphere [troposphere],” the method being “spray-dusting of sun-shading aerial sprays from aircraft, the regulated distribution of sun-shading dust, spray and exhaust fumes in the upper reaches of die [sic] atmosphere mainly by commercial or civilian aircraft.” 36 “Sun shading dust” sounds distinctly like the conductive metal nanoparticles under the rubric of ongoing geoengineering. 

Two of the most widely used jet engine models are the high-bypass turbofan and low-bypass turbofan engines. 

The high-bypass flow-cycle turbofan engine 37 operates more like a large-diameter propeller that routes incoming air around rather than through the engine. The propeller delivers 90 percent of the thrust without burning extra fuel, with only 10 percent going through combustion. No extra fuel means less water vapor or CO2 . Given that condensation requires high vacuum (not high pressure), high humidity, and low temperatures, the air-to-exhaust ratio is too high in the high-bypass engine to facilitate condensation. This engine is primarily used by commercial airlines and large supertankers. Lots of air, low fuel, and little moisture in the high-heat combustion chamber. Brief condensation trails may appear during takeoff when water vapor is expelled, often with a faint black trail. Condensation may also form in high humidity behind high-vacuum areas of the wings when the jet is pitching up or using the flaps, lasting only as long as the vacuum zone lasts. Otherwise, the trails we see are of particulate-rich aerosols. 

The low-bypass turbofan engine takes air in and forces it through the combustion chamber. This engine is less efficient at speeds below Mach 2 but produces great thrust at higher velocities, which makes it perfect for military fighter jets. Under the right conditions (high vacuum, high humidity, low temperature), the increase of water in the exhaust will produce short, non-persistent contrails. Given how high military fighter jets generally fly, sightings of these short non-persistent contrails are rare, and due to the military’s desire for stealth, contrail suppression patents make them rarer still. 

AIR PHARMACOLOGY I: JET FUEL AND CARBON BLACK DUST (CBD), CARBON BLACK AEROSOL(CBA), AND COAL FLY ASH [there it is again dc]

Whether one believes that trails being laid from horizon to horizon are due to chemicals added to jet fuel or chemicals being distributed from supplementary tanks and ducts, the end is the same: we are breathing electro-pharmacologically altered air far more destructive to life than the industrial blight of the past century and a half. 

Since COP21 in Paris, a flurry of activity has centered on aircraft emissions while carefully sidestepping the very real dangers of jet fuel chemical additives classified under Project Cloverleaf. Meanwhile, environmental watchdogs awakening to the jet fuel factor are carefully guided to view it only in terms of carbons, greenhouse gases, ozone, etc. The global aircraft emissions standards developed by the UN’s International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) won’t go into effect until as late as 2025, and even then will only apply to “large planes like airliners and cargo jets and turboprop aircraft, not to smaller jet aircraft, piston-engine planes, helicopters or military aircraft.” 38 The Center for Biological Diversity and Friends of the Earth are suing the EPA for not pressuring airlines to comply with the Clean Air Act. 39 Given that the EPA is a loyal handmaiden to the ICAO, and that the FAA refuses to see itself as responsible for what jets are spewing, it is difficult to believe that legal guidelines will be enforced.

Because domestic airline emissions account for three percent of total greenhouse gas emissions, 40 aircraft makers and fuel experts are working on designing lighter aircraft with more efficient engines, costs which will be passed along to consumers. Fuel and personnel are the two largest operating expenditures of commercial airlines, so the new fuel efficiency standards are forcing domestic airlines to scramble for alternatives. Pratt & Whitney have developed the high-bypass PurePower Geared Turbofan (GTF) engine, which lowers CO2 releases “comparable to the amount of CO2 displaced by 900,000 trees in the same amount of time” and nitrogen oxide by “50 percent below the most rigorous standard set by the United Nations’ International Civil Aviation Organization.” 41 Ultra-low sulfur diesel fuel is under development, as is biofuel—municipal solid waste converted into jet fuel, diesel, and ethanol, “half a billion gallons of fuel in markets across North America at lower costs compared to conventional petroleum fuel, while reducing carbon emissions by more than 80%,” according to Fulcrum BioEnergy Inc. president E. James Macias. 42 

Researcher Jim Lee (climateviewer.com) believes the secret to the chemtrail mystery is in the gas tank. Lee has found documents proving that barium fuel additives and aluminum are in jet fuel, and believes that the ICAO, United Nations, U.S. State Department, DOT, EPA, FAA, and NASA seek to chemically alter contrail cirrus to cool the planet. By manipulating soot and sulfuric acid, heat-trapping pollution can be turned into planet-cooling carbon credit cash. Soot—carbon black dust (CBD) and carbon black aerosol (CBA)—has been recognized for its weather-altering abilities since the 1970s and is the primary ingredient of artificial cloud production. 43 Both carbon black and soot are fossil fuel waste products, but carbon black is in diesel (diesel oxidation), whereas soot arises only during pyrolysis (jet fuel combustion). 

Soot particles are composed of individual, nearly spherical particles (spherules), which have a number mean radius between 10 and 30 nm. 44 

As Lee puts it, the more soot nanoparticles generated by jet exhaust, the more cloud condensation nuclei (CCN or cloud seeds), the more cirrus cloud cover created. 

Lee puts the aviation fuel problem pithily: “The truth is that artificial clouds are destructive to nature, harmful to health, and there is nothing ‘normal’ about fire-breathing metal tubes spewing nanoparticles at 30,000 feet.” 

Add to that the two FOIAs in 1994 from the Joint Nonlethal Weapons Directorate (JNLWD) revealing that the U.S. military was still pursuing weather warfare despite the ENMOD ban 45 : the U.S. Naval Research Lab at China Lake, California was experimenting with weather modification techniques, and the U.S. Air Force Research Lab at Wright Patterson Air Force Base was researching CBD/CBA seeding as a “force multiplier.” 46 

In 1996, the oft-quoted “Weather As A Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025” was released by the USAF Air War College as a roadmap for weather warfare technologies, including a diagram showing the use of CBD by 2005 under “Technologies to be developed by DOD (Department of Defense).” 47 “Owning the Weather” is no “think piece.” At the Test Technology Symposium ’97, “Session B: Advanced Weapon/Instrumentation Technologies,” Dr. Arnold Barnes of the Phillips Lab/GPO at Hanscom Air Force Base reiterated the use of CBD for weather warfare on three slides, including a slide with current capabilities referencing cloud creation. 48 

Harking back to 1973 when atmospheric scientist William M. Gray (Colorado State University) and meteorologist William M. Frank (Pennsylvania State University) proposed aircraft delivery of carbon black soot to heat portions of a hurricane to alter its path, 49 the post-Katrina 2008 Hurricane Modification Workshop sponsored by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology Directorate proposed testing CBD/CBA seeding for hurricane “mitigation.” In a presentation called “Collaborative Research: On Hurricane Modification by Carbon Black Dispersion: Methods, Risk Mitigation, and Risk Communication,” research scientist Moshe Alamaro (Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, MIT) suggested “the use of carbon black aerosol (CBA) to selectively heat parts of the atmosphere by dispersion of CBA above a hurricane.” Among the workshop recommendations was this nugget: “Distribute the CCN (cloud condensation nuclei) aerosols on the periphery of the hurricane using aircraft and ships. When distributing carbon black, release it above the core of the hurricane. Accomplishing the seeding will take further study.” Their plan called for $64 million and 36 months to “conduct large scale test w/evaluation and reports.” 50 Jim Lee believes that drones (UAVs) are doing this testing today and offers the Hurricane Aerosol and Microphysics Program (HAMP) and NASA Genesis and Rapid Intensification Processes (GRIP) programs as examples. 51 Former director of the NOAA Atmospheric Modification Program Joe Golden spoke about HAMP to the American Meteorological Society two years before Frankenstorm Sandy. 

Lee and four fellow activists spoke at a CSPAN-televised hearing of the EPA in Washington, D.C. on August 11, 2015. 52 The EPA was considering regulating six greenhouse gases produced by jet aircraft. Lee pressed the EPA to include cloud creation and randomized testing of in-flight jet aircraft for metal particulates 53 in upcoming aviation pollution regulations. The EPA is supposedly moving ahead with regulating the six greenhouse gases but still ignores the soot, contrail cirrus clouds, and metal particulates. 54 With the Department of Defense and Department of Homeland Security involved in using carbon black dust for weather modification, it should come as no surprise that the EPA, FAA, DOT, and IPCC have no soot reduction goals. 

Two studies, one in 2001 and another in 2008, have caused a panic in the aviation industry. The studies prove that the artificial chemical cirrus cloud cover is trapping heat, as much as 5,000X IPCC estimates, and as much as fifty years’ worth of aviation-produced CO2 ! 

Contrails formed by aircraft can evolve into cirrus clouds indistinguishable from those formed naturally. These ‘spreading contrails’ may be causing more climate warming today than all the carbon dioxide emitted by aircraft since the start of aviation. 55 

CBD may be a great cloud seed, but it absorbs heat. Will the addition of sulfuric acid to these clouds mimic the volcano’s cooling effect and increase the aviation industry’s carbon credits? Geoengineering SRM advocates think so: 

Options for dispersing gases from planes include the addition of sulfur to the fuel, which would release the aerosol through the exhaust system of the plane, or the attachment of a nozzle to release the sulfur from its own tank within the plane, which would be the better option. Putting sulfur in the fuel would have the problem that if the sulfur concentration were too high in the fuel, it would be corrosive and affect combustion. Also, it would be necessary to have separate fuel tanks for use in the stratosphere and in the troposphere to avoid sulfate aerosol pollution in the troposphere. 56 

Doping commercial flight jet fuel looks like the name of the game, whatever the cost to plants, animals, and human beings breathing it all in. Taking a nod from the geoengineers, atmospheric scientist Ulrich Schumann exposes the real chemtrail conspiracy in his recommendations to the ICAO Colloquium on Aviation and Climate Change in 2010: 

• Contrail cirrus contributes a large fraction to the aviation induced climate impact. 

• Satellite data analyses suggest observable impact of aviation on cirrus cover and radiation fluxes. 

• The climate impact of aviation induced contrail cirrus depends on aircraft properties and routing 

• Both aspects [soot and flight routing] offer the potential for aviation to reduce the climate impact of aviation [less soot emissions, LESS WARMING and MORE COOLING CONTRAILS]. 57 

The last statement is a bombshell. Schumann is clearly abandoning the idea of ridding the world of contrails; he is, in fact, advocating for creating cooling contrails and using them for geoengineering SRM purposes. Schumann’s recommendations combine with the recent mandate for aviation biofuels in the ultimate two-tank geoengineering solution: 

Applying high FSCs [fuel sulfur content] at aviation cruise altitudes combined with ULSJ fuel [ultra-low-sulfur jet fuel, aviation biofuel] at lower altitudes result in reduced aviation-induced mortality and increased negative RE [radiative effect] compared to the baseline aviation scenario. 58 

In other words, use high-sulfur jet fuel when we get to flight altitude to cool the planet, use no-sulfur jet biofuel on takeoff to kill fewer people around runways. This is exactly what they are doing. 

Jim Lee closely follows the alternative jet fuel (biofuels) and sulfur fuel doping now being tested under the FAA’s Aviation Climate Change Research Initiative (ACCRI). These tests, dubbed the Alternative-Fuel Effects on Contrails & Cruise EmiSSions or ACCESS-1 and 2, are focused on how different types of fuels make clouds. The three fuels on the drawing board and in the skies are a low sulfur JP-8 fuel, a 50/50 blend of JP-8, and a camelina oilseed-based HEFA fuel or JP-8 fuel doped with sulfur. 59 The agenda behind sulfur content (FSC) geoengineering is to implement SRM worldwide while circumventing international geoengineering and weather modification laws. 

From time to time, sky watchers see “smokers” streak across the sky, leaving behind a dark trail. The oily consistency of carbon black or soot can leave such a trail, as can the sulfur in diesel fuel. Both diesel and carbon black are hard on engines and are sometimes used as short-run solutions for extending old fuel. Carbon black occasionally falls from the sky and coats cars and streets. 60 

Carbon dust is useful to Big Oil and geoengineering in that it absorbs solar energy 61 and can therefore melt the pesky glacial ice slowing up the exploitation of Arctic oil reserves. I already mentioned its use in HAMP to intensify hurricanes, tornadoes/cyclones, etc., 62 and researcher Harold Saive (chemtrailsplanet.net) has posed yet another possible objective of “smokers” laying carbon black: 

Dare we speculate this “smoker” is a desperate attempt by the criminal climate cabal at IPCC to raise the temperature in the upper atmosphere to fool satellite data in order to support the failing evidence for global warming over the past 16 years? As the dark aerosols descend to earth, the ground-based thermometers could be expected to read higher temps as solar radiation heats the black carbon near the sensors. 63 

However we look at it, breathing carbon black nanoparticles is bad for human health. The 2011 University of Iowa paper “Induction of Inflammasome Dependent Pyroptosis by Carbon Black Nanoparticles” in the Journal of Biological Chemistry sounded the alarm:

 . . .the intake of carbon black nanoparticles. . .caused an initial inflammatory response in lung cells. The surprising results came when the team discovered that these nanoparticles killed macrophages—immune cells in the lungs responsible for cleaning up and attacking infections—in a way that also increases inflammation. 64 

Carbon black doesn’t produce cell death by apoptosis (the cell shrinking into itself) but by pyroptosis (bursting and spreading)—in other words, not by atrophy but by heated implosion. 

The sulfur coating of soot means sulfuric acid (H2SO4 ), the major component of acid rain, acidification of the oceans, the Greenhouse Effect, etc. The following admission is from 1998, though it is highly doubtful that it was actually the “first” detection: 

Direct detection of total sulfuric acid (SA) has been achieved for the first time in the plume of a jet aircraft in flight. The measurements show the same SA signatures for the case when SA was injected directly into the exhaust jet and the case when sulfur was provided to the engine with the fuel. 65 

Geophysicist J. Marvin Herndon, Ph.D., believes that the soot or carbon black posited by Jim Lee is actually extremely toxic coal fly ash, a perfect Welsbach material 10–100 microns thick, the lightest of the coal ashes (“component of flowable fill”) 66 in plentiful supply. Captured by electrostatic precipitators, coal fly ash is an anhydrous combustion byproduct containing substantial amounts of silicon dioxide (SiO2 ), aluminum oxide (Al2O3 ), and calcium oxide (CaO) as well as arsenic, beryllium, boron, hexavalent chromium, cobalt, lead, manganese, mercury, molybdenum, selenium, strontium, thallium, and vanadium—all of which are readily released upon contact with water. 

. . .Coal fly ash. . .when subjected to water renders many of its elements partially soluble in water. Some of these are aluminum, barium, strontium, calcium, iron, magnesium, etc. These soluble elements can be measured in rainwater and are in fact found in post-spraying rainwater. Coal fly ash has another advantage to the military — the elements dissolved in atmospheric water make the water much more electrically conducting. This is important for movement by electromagnetic means. 67 

For more than a century, air pollution on the American East Coast has been practically synonymous with the industrial burning of coal (lignite) and 140 million tons of coal combustion waste translating to 70 million tons of fly ash per year, much of which is dumped into 1,100 unlined open storage ponds 68 around the nation contaminating the food chain and local drinking water with toxic heavy metals and radon. Despite the cancer, learning disabilities, neurological disorders, birth defects, and reproductive sterility that arise around these ugly coal ash impoundments, the EPA insists coal ash is a non-hazardous substance 69 :

“Coal ash is basically soil,” says Tom Robl, a University of Kentucky geoscientist who serves as a director of the American Coal Association. Not only is coal ash non-toxic, Robl says, it’s so safe that you could eat a brimming bowlful without adverse consequences. “Feel free to eat as much coal ash as you want—it’s not toxic.” 70 [bullshit dc]

In the same article, Forest Service biologist Dennis Lemly begs to differ: as a highly concentrated byproduct of burning coal, coal ash is hazardous. 71 

In 2015, Herndon published two peer-reviewed papers on how pivotal coal fly ash is to geoengineering and how deleterious it is to human health. The second paper, “Evidence of Coal Fly Ash Toxic Chemical Geoengineering in the Troposophere: Consequences for Public Health,” was published on 11 August 2015 in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and retracted twenty-two days later, followed by a scathing criticism of the first paper in Current Science. Herndon’s third and most thorough paper, “Human Environmental Dangers Posed by Ongoing Global Tropospheric Aerosolized Particulates for Weather Modification,” was published in Frontiers in Public Health on June 30, 2016, and retracted two weeks later. 

Unlike the usual procedures employed to fairly address complaints about peer-reviewed and published papers, neither of the two journals involved provided Herndon with verbatim copies of the complaints made by the highly skilled disinformation team so he could refute them. The implications one might draw from this are (1) Herndon is likely correct about coal fly ash being the main aerosolized particulate, and (2) that officials are aware of the highly toxic nature of the material being sprayed into the air we breathe and want to hide that knowledge from the public. 

Herndon presents four sets of experiments to back up his thesis that hazardous coal fly ash is “likely the principal aerosolized particulate sprayed in the troposphere by jets for geoengineering, weather modification, and/or climate alteration.” 72 Earlier, he’d compared water leach from coal fly ash with rainwater and discovered eight elements in common, especially aluminum/barium and strontium/barium ratios. Rainwater samples in San Diego, California measured at least 30 percent aluminum, and in Chico and Alachua County, Florida, he had high readings of barium, as well. He also compared outdoor dust collected in a HEPA (high-efficiency particulate air) filter with unleached coal fly ash and discovered fourteen elements in common. 

Herndon and Florida Public Health medical officer Mark Whiteside, M.D., M.P.H., demonstrated that snowfall can trap and bring down aerosolized particulates, like the co-precipitation technique used in chemical processes. 73 Upon melting, the snow releases the trapped particulates that drain with the melt water into material that might underlie the snow, such as the fibrous, sticky white mesh discovered in melting snow 74 in Wisconsin. Analysis at Northern Lake Services in Crandon, Wisconsin revealed that twenty-three of twenty-six elements corresponded to what is found in un-leached coal fly ash. Herndon asks: 

So, how might one account for the strikingly different appearance of the fibrous mesh morphology if indeed it is, as evidence indicates, essentially identical in composition to fly ash? 75 

He then wonders if jet fuel combustion (pyrolysis) is responsible for these fibers, along with environmentally destructive methylmercury (CH3Hg ) and ozone-depleting chlorinated-fluorinated hydrocarbons. 

“DUMPING” VIA ENGINE AND 

WING PYLON DRAIN TUBES 

In the Environmental Research Letter 4 (October – December 2009), “Modification of cirrus clouds to reduce global warming,” two delivery mechanisms are pointed out, the first being jet fuel and the second being injections into the hot engine exhaust: 

Since commercial airliners routinely fly in the region where cold cirrus clouds exist, it is hoped that the seeding material could either be (1) dissolved or suspended in their jet fuel and later burned with the fuel to create seeding aerosol, or (2) injected into the hot engine exhaust, which should vaporize the seeding material, allowing it to condense as aerosol in the jet contrail. The objective would not be to seed specific cloud systems but rather to build up a background concentration of aerosol seeding material so that the air masses that cirrus will form in will contain the appropriate amount of seeding material to produce larger ice crystals. 76 

Among the chemtrail activists studying delivery systems, Harold Saive (chemtrailplanet.net) is the most vociferous about a chemical system supplementary to fuel exhaust being necessary to produce “persistent contrails (PC)” and the cirrus cloud cover that follows. Saive makes an excellent point about why the possibility of this delivery system matters so much: 

It’s important to keep in mind that aerosols intended for synthetic climate change, hurricane engineering (H.A.M.P.) and most likely “biologicals” (Morgellons), are deployed with nozzles that have nothing to do with JP-8 fuel, contrails or engine emissions. This explains why a gap between the engine and visible trail is created (albeit very short) when water vapor is replaced by a vaporized chemical/metal like alumina. 77 

Saive points to two recent Internet videos (and there are many others from years past at his site) uploaded by Jörg Meiring of Maryland: “Jesus Christ help us please – LH501 Chemtrail-Sprayer ‘Siegerflieger’” (February 5, 2017), 78 taken by Meiring himself while a passenger on Lufthansa; and “757 chemtrail filmed from cockpit” (February 26, 2017), 79 uploaded by Meiring but filmed by what appears to be an anonymous pilot. In an April 30, 2017 email, Saive describes the cockpit observation thus:

Notice how the solid white line at the bottom of the trail is positioned where most drain tubes are typically mounted. The remainder of the circumferential trail column is a function of turbofan and combustion exhaust turbidity that (in this case) fails to completely capture and homogenize the flow from the drain tubes in order to simulate a water vapor contrail. Notice how the trail becomes less dense as it approaches the top of the column, farthest from point of drain tube injection. A minority of drain tubes mounted above the exhaust would be expected to exhibit differently. 

The cockpit video clearly shows a smaller chemical trail threading beneath the larger, less defined engine exhaust. Critics may say this smaller trail could be a “cargo bay aerosol leak,” but what if this “leak” is to supplement fuel emissions so as to super-saturate cloud condensation nuclei (CCN), as was pointed out in an American Meteorological Society video presentation? 80 And what of the bifurcated trails and tw-engine aircraft leaving three trails? Drain tubes are often conveniently located (even aftermarket re-engineered) inside the bypass duct so as to create the illusion six miles below that all we are seeing is fuel combustion (pyrolysis) emissions. 

Other inconsistencies that question a fuel-only chemical delivery: 

• Sudden on-off trails 

• Sputtering trails that eventually “go dry” with increasingly wider gaps 

• Unique filament, “toothpaste,” and “knots on a rope” trails indicating varying particulate ratios and chemical signatures 

• Questionable volume and mass of single or intertwining aerosol plumes 

• Observations of jets emitting NO trails 

• Observations of starboard or port side emitting a different color (or even missing) trail

So far, we’ve examined chemical delivery systems from the outside. Now, let’s look more closely at what might be going on in the engine combustion chamber. 

AIR PHARMACOLOGY II: SPRAY PYROLYSIS 

AND CHEMI-IONIZATION 

In the December 6, 2001 issue of Columbus Alive, award-winning Ohio reporter Bob Fitrakis, JD, revealed that according to two Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory scientists, two separate projects in electromagnetic weather modification technology were being conducted at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, one involving artificial Al2O3 cloud cover creation to lessen the effects of global warming, the other with barium stearate for over-the-horizon (OTH) military communications, 3D mapping, and radar. 81 

In his 2013 article “Wireless, Chemtrails, and You,” author William Thomas 82 recounts the early work of independent scientist Clifford Carnicom in northern New Mexico and wildlife biologist Francis Mangels, Ph.D., in northern California. Beginning in 1999, Carnicom was documenting high levels of reactive barium salts from aerosol grids over Santa Fe. By 2001, barium levels had nearly doubled in California, despite the fact that industrial barium pollution had all but vanished. With trees and fish dying, Mangels blamed aluminum oxide for soil pH measuring 10X its normal alkalinity. In 2002, an Edmonton, Alberta, Canada landscaper was seeing severe nutrient deficiencies (chlorosis) in flowers and trees; electrical conductivity readings for soil should have been no higher than 1 but were showing 4.6 to 7X higher. Snow samples confirmed elevated aluminum and barium. By 2008, a KSLA-sponsored lab test of Louisiana precipitate found barium to be 6X the toxic level set by the EPA; in 2010, Arizona air particulates of barium and aluminum skyrocketed: aluminum was 15.8X the toxic level, barium 5.3X. Carnicom has confirmed that the barium in our atmosphere is now 8X the level deemed safe to breathe. 

At the Open Mind Conference in Oslo, Norway on October 27, 2012 and later updated as “The Antennas Within the Body” for the 8th Environmental Conference in Nuremberg, Germany, May 30, 2013, German chemist Harald Kautz-Vella presented his paper “The Chemistry in Contrails: Assessing the Impact of Aerosols From Jet Fuel Impurities, Additives and Classified Military Operations on Nature” 83 in which he discusses the alchemy that occurs in the jet combustion engine as well as a deeper consideration of the biological operations of chemical trails. His background includes university studies in Geology, Physics, Mathematics, and Media Science, with a degree specialization in Geoscience. Since 2001, he’s been studying scalar technologies such as zero-point energy, soft weather modification (Wilhelm Reich), electro-fertilization in agriculture, and information-medicine/radionics. 

At the outset, Kautz-Vella stresses that the classified Project Cloverleaf is under the jurisdiction of intelligence agencies, and that advanced military and intelligence operations may depend upon some aspects of classical geoengineering but are not limited to it. Transformation of the lower atmosphere into a controllable, artificially engineered plasma is intended to serve weather engineering, yes, but also to serve 3D radar monitoring, range enhancement, advanced DEW systems, and SDI Space Fence objectives of absolute surveillance under artificial intelligence (AI). 

Kautz-Vella approaches fuel emissions / spraying from a biological effects perspective concentrating on the electro-optical toxicity of the particulate plasma and how it disturbs cell communication and electrical cell potential in plants (and, by extension, other life forms), leading to biophoton 84 deterioration. He references artificially produced clouds as “piezoelectric particulate plasma” and divides the spraying operation that produces them into three categories: 

(1) Jet fuel additives (lead, sulfur, halogens); 

(2) Conventional weather manipulation with ions like silver iodide or based on reflective particles like Al2O3 ; and 

(3) High-tech aerosols for military and intelligence purposes. 

While researching damage to hay harvests in Norway in 2012, Kautz-Vella analyzed soil and rain samples. Heavy metals were within the acceptable range of pollution during the acid rain of the 1970s, so he had to consider what else could have caused grass to stop growing, trees to drop their bark and die, etc. 

He pored over the U.S. Air Force Academy “Chemtrails: Chemistry 131 Manual, Fall 1990.” Though classified formulae are not mentioned in the manual, enough is present to spell out the chemical processes of spray pyrolysis, 85 the thermochemical decomposition of organic material at elevated temperatures (as in aircraft engines) in the absence of oxygen or halogen (the chemically related fluorine, chlorine, bromine, iodine, or astatine); and chemi-ionization, the formation of ions through the reaction of a gas phase atom or molecule. Add metal salts to the combustion process—hydrochloric acid (HCl), ammonium hydroxide (NH4OH), and sodium hydroxide (NaOH); potassium permanganate (KMnO4 ), aluminum nitrate (Al(NO3 )2 ), barium nitrate (Ba(NO3 )2 ), copper II nitrate (CU(NO3 )2 ), iron nitrate (Fe(NO3 )2 ), lead nitrate (Pb(NO3 )2 ), manganese nitrate (Mn(NO3 )2 ), silver nitrate (AgNO3 ), sodium carbonate (Na2CO3 ), sodium chloride (NaCl), sodium iodide (NaI), sodium nitrate (NaNO3 ), etc.—and the jet will create amorphous or monocrystalline non-soluble nanoparticles like, for example, barium-strontium-titanate (BaSrx )TiO3 . 

This is the chemical process of an artificially nucleated condensation trail. In 2005, a paper recounting spectrometer measurements of negative-ion composition and density taken from the exhaust of a J85-GE-5H turbojet at ground level indicated that “ion nucleation is a probable mechanism for volatile aerosol formation.” 

Introduction. Chemions produced in jet engine combustion are speculated to play a role in ion-induced nucleation of aerosols, possibly followed by condensation, which may result in the formation of contrails, cirrus clouds, and pollutants. 86 

Kautz-Vella realized that recent plant degeneration in Norway was not so much due to the chemistry of non-soluble particles but to their electrochemical / optical properties, and that the delivery system seemed to originate from the aerosols in the jet trails overhead. Two compounds were most prevalent: aluminum oxide (Al2O3 ) and barium-strontium-titanate (BaSrx )TiO3 . 

The 1990 Welsbach patent named Al2O3 as the primary compound in aerosol spraying: 

A method is disclosed for reducing atmospheric warming due to the greenhouse effect resulting from a greenhouse gases layer. The method comprises the step of seeding the greenhouse gas layer with a quantity of tiny particles of materials characterized by wavelength-dependent emissivity or reflectivity, in that said materials have high emissivities in the visible and far infrared wavelength regions and low emissivity in the near infrared wavelength region. Such materials can include the class of materials known as Welsbach materials. The oxides of metal, e.g., aluminum oxide, are also suitable for the purpose. The greenhouse gases layer typically extends between about seven and thirteen kilometers above the earth’s surface. The seeding of the stratosphere occurs within this layer. The particles suspended in the stratosphere as a result of the seeding provide a mechanism for converting the blackbody radiation emitted by the earth at near infrared wavelengths into radiation in the visible and far infrared wavelength so that this heat energy may be reradiated out into space, thereby reducing the global warming due to the greenhouse effect. 87 

Kautz-Vella posited that the Al2O3 from military afterburner technology in jets and rockets attaches to the membranes of trees’ tiny rootlets and blocks nutrient uptake, causing the roots to die. Aluminum oxide can be created in spray pyrolysis but only in the beginning phase of the engine firing, as monocrystalline structuring needs at least 1700°C (3092°F). Thus the lion’s share of Al2O3 in the soil must be coming from afterburner technology inbuilt into an endless number of military aircraft. 

The second compound of (BaSrx )TiO3 piezoelectric crystals is formed during the engine combustion process due to the presence of barium, strontium, and titanium salts in the fuel. 

In 1996, scientist Jim Phelps of Oak Ridge National Laboratory invented a titanium-based (Ti) aerosol “shield” system that formed less toxic fluor-aluminum compounds, prevented ozone loss, and reduced global warming by seeding reflective particles that blocked sunlight while allowing infrared (IR) through. Unfortunately but not surprisingly, the military promptly abused Phelps’ invention in (BaSrx )TiO3 . 

Combined with barium (Ba) and strontium (St), Ti piezocrystals photo-ionize to block sunlight during the day while allowing IR at night. Phelps explained: 

The UV sprays use the same techniques to leave a spray of barium and titanium materials in the air. Plain titanium dioxide is an extremely good UV blocker. This brings on the last shield system, on the very surface or Earth and on the most vulnerable UV target organ. The US has arranged for titanium dioxide to be used in things like soap and detergent, which leaves one covered with a film of this material. One can usually see the paint-like scum in showers from the sticky titanium dioxide build up, along with calcium. This same film is all over most persons’ skin and helps shield the skin from UV. The body is very tolerant of titanium and is not prone to set off the immune system inflammation response. 

This is not so true of aluminum and barium compounds. Even LLNL studies turn down the use of Al in chemspray methods. The combined effects of these compounds with other pollutants can well cause lasting lung damage. 88 

Phelps’ titanium-based method and recent reports of methane (CH4 ) being used to introduce metal salts to the combustion process 89 point to two new methods of spray pyrolysis: infrasound dispersion of water-soluble salts, and methane-based additives mixed with the jet fuel. But how much and how many of the metal salts raining down on us are bio-available, and how many are insoluble? What is obvious is that bioaccumulation of non-soluble crystals with electrochemical / optical effects are now in the food chain and synergistically spell disaster. 

Barium occurs naturally in barium-rich soil, but the piezoelectric barium nanocrystals aerially distributed over North America are intended to enhance radar signals by refraction for military C4 operations. Sadly, the excited piezoelectric crystals in barium, silver (silver nitrate for cloud seeding), and strontium have been linked to chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) clusters and other transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs) like fibromyalgia. But this “collateral damage” does not concern the military, and the medical studies 90 that might issue a wake-up call to the public are marred by ignorance of the role played by the constant 24/7 aerial delivery system. 

The synthesis of (BaSrx )TiO3 and creation of defined nanoparticles (chemiions) occurs during spray pyrolysis inside the jet engine chamber: 

Spray pyrolysis involves passing an aerosol of a precursor solution through a graded temperature reactor in which the individual droplets are thermally decomposed to form the oxide particles. 91 

Clouds can then be “switched” on and off by zapping the piezoelectric barium-strontium-titanate compound and altering its crystal geometry. The free current then charges the aerosol particle and creates an ion that attracts moisture and forms a cloud. 

Dielectric and piezoelectric barium titanate is excellent for nonlinear optics. High beam-coupling gain means it can operate at visible and near-infrared wavelengths, and its pyroelectric and ferroelectric properties make it useful for thermal camera sensors. In other words, the compound’s optical capabilities are paramount in the military mind. With photons up-converted and their spin altered, the “sky theater” above can offer holographic screening as well as plasma cloud creation. Kautz-Vella explains: 

With regards to barium-strontium-titanate used as aerosols in the atmosphere, this effect could be used to “switch” clouds “on and off” by applying electromagnetic fields such as those created by HAARP and EISCAT devices or other radar or microwave radiating antenna systems. These research and military installations have equipment with sufficient strength to alter the crystal geometry of the barium-strontium-titanate while in the atmosphere, which in turn leads to free current that would charge the aerosol particle and create an ion that will attract vapor and instantly lead to the forming of a droplet in the then-forming cloud. 92 

Once these non-soluble nanocrystals and their EM properties fall to Earth, however, they are taken up as a whole by plants whose health and growth then suffer. In mammals and humans, these same nanocrystals damage the nervous system and weaken biophotonic activity. Kautz-Vella stresses that because (BaSrx )TiO3 nanocrystals absorb biophotons, the nanoparticle-plasma mix affects DNA light communication while serving as a matrix for synthetic biology and self-assembling nanomachines (like Morgellons). Electro-optical nanocrystals can produce signals that interfere with DNA, and artificial crystals replace natural ferro apatite crystals that play a major role in central nervous system (CNS) transmission. Kautz-Vella warns of the possibility of mind control via in vivo piezo crystals:

If the natural ferro apatite crystal is replaced by artificially made piezoelectric crystals, it appears to open the biological system to respond to a greater extent of artificial electromagnetic signals, both low and high frequency. 93 

Many jet propellants and additives are classified while others are open source. Classified JP-8, for example, is suspected of containing chemicals such as 1,2-dibromoethane (EDB), perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS), perfluorooctane acid (PFOA), 94 and lead tetraethyl. 95 All contain fluorine, sulfur, and brome and are regarded as important sources of the aerosols H2SO4 , HF, and HBrO3 , all of which build highly toxic persistent contrails. The damaging impact of such additives is far more than that of sulfur and aluminum oxide reflective particles. 

Media exposure of aerotoxic syndrome has drawn attention to the two million military and civilian personnel per year who are occupationally exposed to chemical gases coming from the engine chamber. 96 Unfortunately, the blood tests for aerotoxicity of pilots, cabin crew, and frequent flyers test for organophosphates but not necessarily for heavy metals in the chemical compounds pyrolized in the 60 billion gallons per year of kerosene-based jet propulsion fuels (JP-8, JP-5, and Jet A-1). Add to that no knowledge of the classified compounds, pyrolized (heated) jet oil leaks coming straight out of the engine, and nanoparticles leaking in from outside the aircraft (chemtrails, Wigner Effect radiation)—all coming through the bleed air valve. 

As for the unclassified chemical gases from the engine chamber and pylon drain tubes entering the cabin, it is worth quoting at length from a 2003 peer-reviewed paper: 

These exposures may occur repeatedly to raw fuel, vapor phase, aerosol phase, or fuel combustion exhaust by dermal absorption, pulmonary inhalation, or oral ingestion routes. Additionally, the public may be repeatedly exposed to lower levels of jet fuel vapor/aerosol or to fuel combustion products through atmospheric contamination, or to raw fuel constituents by contact with contaminated groundwater or soil. Kerosene-based hydrocarbon fuels are complex mixtures of up to 260+ aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbon compounds. . .including varying concentrations of potential toxicants such as benzene, n-hexane, toluene, xylenes, trimethylpentane, methoxyethanol, naphthalenes . . . 97 

And the list goes on. 

ROCKET PLUME BURNS 

Rocket launches release tons of rocket plume burn that then spew over the countryside, ocean, or populated areas as the rocket arcs skyward. With every orbital launch (as opposed to suborbital), 20 to 120 tons of nano-aluminum particulates are dumped with the exhaust plume into the lower and upper atmospheres. Aluminum delivered by chemical trails and rocket plumes is the lightest, most excellent conductive metal we have. (Iron and gold oxides are actually the best but are too heavy and fall too quickly. Aluminum is light as a feather and stays airborne longer.) The electronics necessary for global weather engineering will not work without light aluminum particulates. 

The aerosol brew laid by jets above the cloud cover heats regions by fomenting chemical reactions and trapping solar radiation. Previously, it was thought that the critical cloud fraction (CCF) value was the same everywhere, but the truth is that regional CCF values differ according to aerosol chemical signatures. 98 In 2004, NASA’s senior research scientist Patrick Minnis admitted that artificial cirrus clouds formed by aircraft exhaust increased Earth surface temperatures between 1975 and 1994 (the Venus Effect) and added to the greenhouse gas effect. 99 In Chemtrails, HAARP, I quoted cloud physicist William R. Cotton’s insight into how jet-created cloud cover is the opposite of a “global warming” solution: 

. . .cirrus clouds contribute to warming of the atmosphere owing to their contribution to downward transfer of LW [long-wave] radiation. In other words they are a greenhouse agent. . .It has even been proposed to seed in clear air in the upper troposphere to produce artificial cirrus which would warm the surface enough to reduce cold-season heating demands (Detwiler and Cho 1982). So the prospects for seeding cirrus to contribute to global surface cooling do not seem to be very good. 100 

Metal oxide nanoparticles are the golden key to the military’s C4 objectives. Nano-crystalline metal oxides act as semiconductors 101 to activate acids and bases interacting with light, then bind with chemical and biological agents in strange synergies. With chemical trails feeding radio and microwave frequencies, the military can tune to a frequency and transport it anywhere they want. They can build an antenna in the air and develop a system of computer communication with other systems through the clouds. Metal oxides enhance obscurants made from carbon nanotubes to help conceal exotic propulsion craft, jet fighters, and battleships from radar and sharp eyes. 

Conductive metal nanoparticles in the atmosphere act as capacitors 102 to store energy and propagate conductive antenna fields. When metals suspended in the air are hit with radio frequency (RF), they resonate the length of the wave, then duplicate it. Fire a laser pulse for one-trillionth of a second and the distance the laser fires will be the distance of the wavelength you can then tune to. If a 10-meter wavelength creates a tunnel or waveguide the length of the pulse in the atmosphere, you can use it to tune a cavity 103 to a specific frequency so tight that it will resonate harmonically and build from that frequency, duplicating itself over and over again, resonating that same wave over and over again, ringing like a bell or guitar string. If there is no resistance, it will go on forever. This is what Tesla meant by the perpetual existence of free energy. 104 

The argument that aluminum is naturally present in the Earth’s crust and used in food, water, medicines, vaccines, and cosmetics with no consequences ignores the multiplying electro-chemical effects of aerosol aluminum oxide’s disruption of “biological self-ordering, energy transduction, and signaling systems, thus increasing biosemiotic entropy.” 105 Aluminum forms toxic complexes with fluorine and interacts negatively with mercury, lead, and glyphosate. Central nervous system (CNS) disorders point to aluminum poisoning, in part because the biophysics of water plays such a pivotal role in bio degeneration. One study used the toxicity of the water flea (Ceriodaphnia dubia) to determine the impact of aluminum oxide nanoparticles on fresh water ecosystems. 106 

The average adult human body is 55–65 percent water, with infant bodies at 75–78 percent until one year old, when it drops to 65 percent. 

With nano-aluminum, -barium, and -lithium oxides being spewed from jets, rockets, and ships in this nano-chemical warfare era, every community should plan an annual analysis by a trace atmospheric gas analyzer (TAGA) mobile atmospheric lab once only requested for chemical explosions and train derailment or tanker spills. Even eco-friendly Portland, Oregon (population 619,360) has found hexavalent chromium in its air and soil. 107 States like Maryland are passing clean air acts and going after known nano compounds like sulfur dioxide (SO2 ) and nitrogen oxide (NOx ). But what of other compounds falling from the sky and synergistically reacting with everything from industry pollutants to ionized radiation? 

What is more concerning is how quiet atmospheric chemists are about what they’re discovering with their advanced aerosol mass spectrometry, particles-into-liquid samplers, and cloud condensation nuclei counters regarding anthropogenic and biogenic releases impacting air quality, human and environmental health, and regional climate. Sulfates spewed by coal-fired power plants and nitrogen oxides emitted by vehicles mixing with oxygen is one thing, but what happens when they interact with ubiquitous nonionized wireless radiation? 108 

Are chronic sub-lethal synergies transforming life as we’ve known it? 

Meanwhile, space as a business model is taking off. Private corporations profiting from Project Cloverleaf “climate change” ventures are launching private rockets from military and private launch pads. For example, the U.S.-owned Rocket Lab in Auckland, Australia has its eye on an Australian paddock with an excellent azimuth and launch trajectory and is planning to create orbital rockets for less than US$5 million so that smaller companies, research and environmental groups can launch their own satellites. 3D printers will spit out the engines, and carbon fiber will make the bodies so lightweight that 1-meter rockets will be able to launch low-earth orbit satellites with lifespans of five to seven years instead of 10,000 years. 

For a mere $20 million, billionaire Elon Musk’s Space X (Space Exploration Technologies Corporation) 109 delivered the first space tourist, multimillionaire Dennis Tito of the nonprofit Inspiration Mars Foundation, to the International Space Station (ISS) in 2001. In January 2018, Tito plans to be on the Mission for America to Mars, a modified SpaceX Dragon spacecraft to be launched (given that Earth and Mars are in favorable positions) by a Falcon Heavy rocket. The trip up and back will take 501 days. No mention of the Van Allen Radiation Belts impasse, 110 nor other pitfalls: 

As the joint Russian-European Mars 500 experiment that recently ended proved, we are far from fully understanding how individuals react to long-term isolation. Also, the impact of high-energy particles on the brain during long-duration spaceflight are [sic] only just beginning to come to light. And then there’s the degradation of drugs in long-duration spaceflight. And muscle atrophy. And bone wastage (you get the point). 111 

Down below, as we ingest and inhale aluminum oxide and other toxic flotsam and jetsam, rocket deliveries of “dusty plasma” are being laid in near-earth orbit to construct a Space Fence “ring” around the equator. We will take a closer look at this in Chapter 6, “The ‘Star Wars’ Space Fence Rises Again.” 

OCEAN DELIVERY SYSTEMS 

Beside jet chemical trails and rocket flotsam and jetsam, cloud reflectivity modification contributes to the 90 percent cloud cover over water necessary for geoengineering’s many military operations. Between the High Seas Alliance and the UN Law of the Sea, two-thirds of the world’s international waters lying outside national territories and economic zones—almost half the planet—are being commandeered for geoengineering, as well. Moisture and weather systems over oceans are grist for the mills of three ocean delivery systems: iron particulates, marine brightening, and ship tracks. 

In 2012, Russ George, former CEO of Planktos, Inc., dumped iron sulfate particulates off the British Columbia coast, claiming that quickened phytoplankton growth would replenish Haida salmon. However, quickening the alpha-penene in plankton to increase a biogenic aerosol reaction to magnify cloud mass may have been closer to the truth. The resulting 10,000 square kilometers of phytoplankton blooms could be seen from space, 112 along with significant cloud mass. 

Trees are the basis of terrestrial life while oxygen-producing phytoplankton is the basis of ocean life. Phytoplankton is also the chief driver of organic matter and bacterial enzyme activity in submicron seaspray aerosols that contribute to cloud formation. 113 Ironically, much of the decline of phytoplankton is due to the aluminum toxicity raining down on biotopic communities. (Nano-crystals remain as long as eighteen months in the atmosphere before falling on the ocean surface.) Less phytoplankton means CO2 above the current 404 ppm. The more alumina, the less phytoplankton; the more carbon dioxide, the less oxygen. 114 

It is possible that scientists who are making connections about what’s really going on are remaining silent for self-preservation: Research scientist Tiffany Moisan, 48, an expert on phytoplankton and climate change, was employed at NASA’s Wallops Flight Facility until Sunday, June 5, 2016, when she was found murdered behind a store in Princess Anne, Maryland. 115 

Regarding the other two ocean delivery systems, marine cloud brightening is basically spraying seawater toward the upper atmosphere to make clouds reflect sunlight back into space, while ship tracks are cloud releases from ship exhaust (and wet surface air cooler technology). Marine cloud brightening is used to feed and direct “extreme weather events” like hurricanes (cyclones). Kerry Emanuel, who teaches meteorology at MIT, offers a clue as to how sea spray aerosols can be useful: 

Hurricanes get their energy from evaporated seawater. We all know this from experience: you climb out of the swimming pool and shiver even on a warm day, especially when it’s windy. Because the evaporation of water on the skin draws warmth away from the body. This is exactly what happens with a hurricane: the wind causes the water to evaporate and draws warmth out of the ocean. The water vapour condenses to a cloud in the wall of the eye of the hurricane. The stronger the wind, the more the water evaporates, and the stronger the storm becomes. We think it is possible to intervene at precisely this point so as to ensure that the water evaporates more slowly. 116 

Ship tracks make and steer weather, keep the ship hidden, and ease and block communications. Since the 1967 Clean Air Act, ship track plumes from ship exhaust have been loaded with sulfur particulates (in marine diesel) and CO2 , which in the atmosphere provide nuclei for cloud droplets to condense around to form bright clouds that are more reflective, carry more water, and withhold precipitation. 

In general, the air above the oceans suffers from less turbulence and convection than the air above land. The lower atmosphere is especially calm over the eastern Pacific in the summertime due to a layer of hot air that settles in 500 to 700 meters above that region of the ocean, [James Coakley, atmospheric scientist at Oregon State University] explained. This effect creates a temperature inversion, placing a cap on the cooler air below, trapping pollutants and water vapor. While the inversion is responsible for the smog that reduces air quality in Los Angeles, it also allows for the formation of long lasting ship tracks. The particles bellowing from the ships’ smokestacks enter the air above the eastern Pacific and create long, thin clouds that remain there for days. 117 

Some ship tracks arise from commercial ships, others from U.S. Navy (and other military) ships. In June 1994, the Monterey Area Ship Track (MAST) experiment was conducted off the California coast, its purported objective being to see how ship tracks modify cloud albedo, “the effects of ships on the microphysics and radiative properties of marine stratocumulus clouds . . .” 118 But the MAST experiment was really about concocting sea spray aerosols to ice nucleate particles and produce artificial clouds. 119 

In 2003, the Arabian Sea Monsoon Experiment (ARMEX-2003) was conducted aboard the ORV Sagarkanya off the west coast of India. Once again, the engine’s combustion chamber revealed itself to be key to the production of chemical clouds via chemions: 

In addition to sulphate and water vapour emissions, the carbonaceous emissions are known to add to the nucleation/growth of the chemions to intermediate ions. . .Formation of intermediate ions in the engine’s exhaust has been associated with the generation of chemions within the engine combustors which provide centers for the rapid growth of molecular clusters and the formation of electrically charged sulfuric acid/water aerosols. . .the engines of aircraft, motor vehicle, and ships all emit chemions and these chemions may play an important role in particle formation. 120 

The base nano-metal in ship tracks is lithium oxide (Li2O). Lithium is highly water-reactive, 121 and by combining it with superheated saltwater it becomes not just battery-ready but prolific. 

Lithium is usually mined from ore, but brine evaporation could become its lowest-cost source. . .Salt water could become the best source for lithium extraction. 122 

In 2015, Oregon activist Ann Fillmore, Ph.D., wrote an article 123 about how lithium was hitting coastal towns along the Oregon Coast and the resultant health complaints of residents: lethargy, thirst, stomach distress, sudden weight gain, muscle and joint pain, twitching, loss of appetite, slurred speech, blurred vision, confusion/hallucinations, ersatz goiter, impotence, endocrine disruptions causing severe menses, kidney pain, skin rashes, hair loss, etc. Her Facebook comments drew two letters from an anonymous whistleblower who chose the moniker “Locke” (as in John Locke), “an employee of a weather data collection company and, by proxy, a subcontractor for the National Weather Service office in [central Oregon]. . .I collected data, e.g. soil samples, that were used to direct spraying operations for the last three years.” 

He described how the “psychoactive chemical” lithium was being dispersed “to manufacture air stagnation in the Rogue and Umpqua Valleys as well as much of the Oregon Coast south of Florence,” and how the Sociological Research Division “has operatives throughout the region gathering a massive amount of data regarding the test population’s behavioral traits like consumer habits, political engagement levels, and awareness of geoengineering programs.” (Emphasis added.) Ann writes: 

Up until now [September 2015], they have had to manufacture a weather inversion or stagnant air inversion to apply the lithium. . I noticed the new method of holding the lithium haze cloud in place first over the area in northern California where the massive fires have hit . . . 

“Holding the lithium haze cloud in place” sounds distinctly like ship tracks. The most active part of ship tracks lies above, where a plasma-induced iCloud “computer” can be pinned and wedged between the frequencies of higher altitude chemclouds and low-altitude chemclouds whose ice particle count has been increased by laser- and radio frequency-induced plasma. Introduce anhydrous ammonia (NH3 ) at specific points during the lithium/water reaction and the mid-atmosphere can be stimulated. Supercharge the two layers of chemclouds and run a laser beam between them to create a super-antenna that gathers and stores messages. Ergo, set up networks, communicate with satellites and other processors, etc. Strike the first beam with another beam (scalar interferometry) and you can store hard data on a virtual “CD.” 

Utilizing clouds as optical systems is exactly what will be occurring in space as rockets deliver their payloads of “dusty plasma.” 

WSAC STEAM RELEASE 

Direct steam condensation for generating power—steam releases from nuclear reactors, power plants, etc.—often depends upon evaporative wet surface air cooler (WSAC) technology that can also be used to fuel engineered weather systems in the South Pacific or on land. 

There are seven thousand power plants in the U.S., most of which are east of the Mississippi River and all of which have large cooling towers and/or WSACs that can produce thousands of gallons of water vapor per minute. Researcher WeatherWar101 makes an important observation about water vapor generation fueling: “Clearly these immense facilities and all of this open-loop water are not there solely to cool closed-loop fluid. . .at a coal power plant.” 124 As with cell towers built to produce far more power than cell receptivity requires, WSACs are built for “dual use.” 

In an email, WeatherWar101 explained how the WSAC closed-loop / open-loop technology works: 

WSACs are both closed loop and open loop. That is to say they are used to cool the closed-loop working fluid driving the turbines to create electricity, whereas the water sprayed on closed loop tubes is an open loop system. Hence the billowing steam seen from satellite is produced from the open loop portion. In most instances, cooling tower and WSAC water is as close to “pure” as they can get it, primarily to ensure that the equipment stays clean. This applies only to cooling tower stacks, of course, and not to actual power plant stacks whose contents mix with the cooling tower water vapor on ascending to mix with the descending chemtrails / nanoparticles that facilitate NexRad frequency manipulation. 125 

Thus we see how power plant and nuclear stacks add particulates to the chemical stew overhead, synergizing with the descending conductive metals and Mylar nanoparticles. As steam particles ascend, the moisture feeds what is descending and multiplies the chemical effect. 

Western Canada GOES Satellite feeds captured how billowing water vapor from industrial cooling and power plant stacks and WSACs in East Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama fed the storm front that became the Louisiana flood of August 14, 2016. 126 That 100,000 people in Louisiana and southwest Mississippi lost everything was simply the collateral damage that accompanies successful weather warfare operations. 

Just as the U.S. Navy and recruited merchant ships produce ship tracks in the South Pacific that can be harnessed to feed and direct weather systems, so industrial plants are recruited to do the same on land, proving once again that the military and industry work hand in hand. The floods in Louisiana, West Virginia (two weeks before), and Macedonia in the Balkans (one week before) were not due to any 1,000-year cycle or “inland sheared tropical depression.” They were engineered with in-place water vapor generation. Spray aerosols into the atmosphere to capture moisture, then release billions of tons of rainwater with electromagnet

CLOUD SEEDING AND IONIZATION (PLUVICULTURE) 

Next to rain dances in the Southwest United States, cloud seeding may be the oldest rainmaker technology. Whereas high-tech geoengineering creates original chemical clouds on a global scale, cloud seeding since 1946 has depended upon silver iodide (AgI) flares to produce rain from already-present clouds on a local scale. Nanosilver is in anti-bacterial agents and food packaging, and its nanoparticles end up penetrating the intestinal cells and wreaking havoc. 127 

Despite the fact that nanosilver is damaging to humans and animals, state governments have passed codes allowing aerial spraying and given their ecology agents carte blanche to issue licenses and permits for “weather modification operations,” the (wrong) assumption being that weather modification refers only to cloud seeding for rain and not to geoengineering. 128 

Might on-the-books cloud seeding/ionization laws just as well provide legal ballast for prosecuting businesses and state agencies that sign off on broader geoengineering agendas? Nevada and Texas come to mind. Nevada has invested in a DAx8, an eight-rotor UAS (unmanned aircraft system) whose attached cloud-seeding cargo is remotely controlled by advanced software and GPS guidance. 129 

Then there is SOAR (Seeding Operations and Atmospheric Research), that during the week of April 6–10, 2015 fired sixteen silver iodide flares into passing clouds from an aircraft and produced a tornado that killed two people and wounded a dozen others: [disturbing right there folks, very disturbing dc]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_tornadoes_in_April_2015

The tornadoes created by this group annually have led to the deaths of thousands, the displacement and inconvenience of millions, and unspeakable property destruction through “tornado alley”. . .As there is no such thing as a natural cloud, fog dissemination a/k/a geoengineering or chemical terrorism, and the processes of cloud seeding work together as part of a worldwide carbon credit scheme, cashing in on people’s lives and property. 130 [that's just swell to know dc ]

In Chemtrails, HAARP, and the Full Spectrum Dominance of Planet Earth, I discussed how rainmakers like SciBlue and Aquiess are about far more than delivering rain: 

To be blunt, electromagnetic weather engineering that can create and steer extreme weather promises untold profit and power. At the close of the YouTube “The Story of Artificial Clouds,” NASA climate scientist Jim Hansen is even more blunt: “Human induced climate change is a great moral issue on par with slavery.” 

The cunning misapprehension that cloud seeding is a synonym for geoengineered weather modification is hoodwinking every state and nation. For example, what was going on in Tasmania when Hydro Tasmania conducted cloud seeding over the Derwent River catchment as huge storms approached and flooding, death, and destruction followed? 131 And was China’s gesture to share its cloud seeding technology with drought-torn Maharashtra, India, 132 a BRICS partner, a generous offer or a political move? The Technical Management Unit of Artificial Rain in Indonesia is spending US$45 million to purchase seven Casa CN-235s, C-212s, and N-219s to plump up its weather mod task force. 133 Is this more “dual use”? India, Indonesia, and Iraq have used the SU-30K as a dual use, all-weather aircraft with extended range and mid-air refueling capability—well suited for high-altitude/high-speed aerosol delivery in service to weather warfare. 

Cloud seeding is now a handmaiden to global geoengineering as “climate change” carbon credit scams and political muscling march on with companies like SOAR, Weather Modification, Inc., Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, etc. Disasters spell money to be made, human society be damned. 

RADIATION AND THE WIGNER EFFECT 

The complexity of nuclear experimentation is beyond the pale of postmodern human comprehension. It also reveals, although we would like to believe otherwise, our inability or unwillingness to consider the unseen. Whether it is invisible because of ethereal origins or because it is nano-sized poison does not matter; collectively we tend to obfuscate the unseen. Nuclear experimentation also reveals our collective inability to conceptualize time, and to understand just how long nuclear radiation lasts in our environment . . . 

— Ethan Indigo Smith and Andy Whiteley, 

“Geoengineering and the Nuclear Connection” 

Meanwhile, the weaponization of space continues to violate the 1967 UN Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space. In 1965, SNAP-10A was launched, the first space nuclear reactor with a controlled fission reaction inside and enough uranium to produce 600 watts of power for a year. Forty-three days after launch, the reactor miraculously shut down, but SNAP10A is still orbiting as it falls apart, spreading radioactivity with its debris. 134 

After a twenty-eight-year hiatus, NASA has revived production of powder plutonium-238 in tandem with the Kilopower Project’s uranium-fueled (U-235) Stirling engines for deep-space missions. 135 The half-life of plutonium-238 is 88 years while the half-life of uranium-235 is 700 million years. “Radioisotope power systems” for “deep-space exploration,” 136 or for space wars? 

Prowling nuclear submarines, aging silos, radioactive waste dump fires, 137 and Big Oil’s reckless releases of radioactive radon via fracking (hydraulic fracture and shale gas extraction processes) are what most people think of when the topic of radiation hazards rears its ugly head. Ionized radiation technology is big business, protected by a sprawling international industry in turn protected by agencies like the U.S. Department of Energy and Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Atomic Energy Commission until 1974). For more than 70 years, nuclear energy has marched on, despite public opinion that it spells death for the planet and all living beings. 

On any day in America, radioactive I-131 particles with a half-life of eight days are settling into thyroid glands as strontium-90, cesium-137, zirconium and other radioactive isotopes nestle into other tissues. Cows eat fallout grass, Americans drink fallout milk and eat fallout cheese and meat as the Sun’s cosmic rays penetrate the atmosphere and intensify the ionized radiation. This witches’ brew is then absorbed by soil, rock, water—and this is before considering the new synergies since chemtrail fallout. 

Because galactic and solar radiation filter through our magnetosphere shield, commercial aircrews are classified as radiation workers, though the levels of radiation to which they are subjected are mysteriously undocumented. The National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements reported in 2009 that aircrews have the highest annual dose of radiation of all radiation-exposed workers in the U.S. 138 While it is well known that a solar storm or frequent high-latitude flight increases radiation exposure, the extent of what it means for human health remains unquantified, despite the spontaneous abortions, tissue damage, breaks in DNA strands, chemically active radicals altering cell function, etc. Nowcast of Atmospheric Ionizing Radiation for Aviation Safety (NAIRAS) and Automated Radiation Measurements for Aviation Safety (ARMAS) claim they will rectify this oversight. 

Quantifying the levels of atmospheric ionizing radiation is of particular interest to the aviation industry since it is the primary source of human exposure to high-linear energy transfer (LET) radiation. High-LET radiation is effective at directly breaking DNA strands in biological tissue, or producing chemically active radicals in tissue that alter the cell function, both of which can lead to cancer or other adverse health effects. 139 

But it is not just solar storms and galactic radiation pouring through our HAARP-damaged magnetosphere that are making pilots pass out. Three years after the horror of the initial 2011 Fukushima Daiichi release, 140 a team of independent researchers—geoscientist Leuren Moret (www.leurenmoret.info/), former U.S. Navy engineer Laurens Battis, and former NIH Clinical Study Coordinator and researcher Christina Consolo (climateviewer.com/radchick/)—began collecting and documenting aircraft mishaps that seemed to point to the Wigner Effect or discomposition effect, the displacement of atoms in a solid caused by neutron radiation. Their twelve YouTube videos document their findings, beginning with “MAYDAY: The Wigner Effect” (September 16, 2014) and ending with “The Wigner Effect: Full Interview” (March 25, 2016). 

Fukushima is an ongoing tragedy not just for Japan but for the entire planetary biosphere. In Japan, radiation levels exceed 40,000 Becquerels 141 per square meter (Bq/m2) over 54,054 square miles. Ten million Japanese citizens are still living in the “radiation-controlled” area. Nuclear engineer Hiroaki Koide believes that Fukushima should be declared uninhabitable and citizens evacuated; that this remains undone “is a serious crime committed by Japan’s ruling elite.” Former Prime Minister Naoto Kan says half of Japan’s entire population of 127 million has been exposed, including Tokyo (50 million), and believes that if all were evacuated, “it would have virtually meant the end of Japan.” Over 70 percent of Japan’s agricultural land is contaminated. 142 

I repeat: Fukushima is an ongoing global event—and synergy experiment. 

Even now, the spent fuel pools that broke through the pressure vessel and entered the ground and ocean—initially 210 quadrillion Bq of cesium-137, which reacts rapidly with water to become hygroscopic cesium hydroxide, plus 2,000 other nuclides (isotopes) and breeder reactor “Wigner black dust” (nanoparticles)—are daily adding 30 billion Bq of cesium-137 and 30 billion Bq of strontium to the ocean. Add the neutron-pulsing plume and Japanese debris heading ever east around the globe via ocean and atmospheric fluid dynamics, and it becomes evident how imperative it is to analyze the impact of the synergy between the radiation and our chemicalized plasma atmosphere. 

Consolo points out that a Fox News investigation discovered that the U.S. military saw a 48 percent increase in non-combat aviation crashes in 2014 and 2015 and that in part it is blamed on maintenance issues. 143 Almost daily, reports of runway delays and crashing aircraft due to structural anomalies are occurring. Windshields are cracking, helicopter cross tubes breaking, tail rotors failing, dropping oil pressure, melting batteries, lithium batteries exploding on the ground, faulty hydraulics, panels falling off, wings partially detaching, electrical generator and fluid power system failures, nose gear and landing gear issues, engines catching fire or failing, strange explosions, loud bangs, smoke, smells, cabin depressurization, de-icing systems kicking on, metal particles found in failed engine filters, malfunctioning computers, deployment of emergency slides in mid-flight, water pipes breaking. Is repetitive flying through radioactive air the cause? 

While these failures are clear indicators of entropy (breakdown of compounds), it is the speed at which they are occurring—even with budget-cutting maintenance taken into consideration—that points to radiation’s cumulative crystallizing effect on metal, 144 similar to how nuclear reactors eventually submit to thermal embrittlement. Look a little further and we see young people dropping dead from cardiac arrest and children as young as two having in-flight heart attacks. 145 Fissures may be behind hydrovolcanic explosive events underground, but “metal fatigue” is failing hydraulics in cars, roller coasters, and jetways, water main breaks, nuclear plant transformer fires, even “freak accidents” like that at the Brooklyn Bridge. 146 

Are these signs of entropy connected to the synergy going on between ionized chemtrail nanoparticles, “Wigner black dust” radioactive nanoparticles, static electricity, and other ionizing and non-ionizing sources? The interaction between the nano-chemical ionizing of the atmosphere and the Fukushima catastrophe—both under a silent shroud of “national security”—may be escalating a planetary decay and disintegration of collapsing bridges, failing buildings, and unnaturally deteriorating bodies. 

Moret emphasizes that only 15 percent of the radioisotopes from the 1,200 bomb tests at Nevada Test Site for the past half-century has been precipitated, which means that 85 percent is still suspended in the atmosphere—and this is not counting ionized chemtrail nanoparticulates! High overhead, moisture is gradually condensing around these highly charged particulates and forcing them earthward. Not only are they all desiccants, but wherever they fall as rain or snowflakes, radiation remains (the Van der Waal force), and there is no way to decontaminate it. 

Fighter jets fly higher and faster than commercial jets and are therefore subject to higher radiation levels. The static electricity they (and helicopters) generate leads to a massive voltage buildup that contributes mightily to multiplying nanoparticles trapped in electrical fields subject to ionized radiation. What happens to pilots traveling at Mach 1.5+? Stealth F-22 Raptor 147 pilot Josh Wilson with the Virginia Air National Guard announced on CBS News 60 Minutes that the U.S. Air Force was threatening pilots with career reprisals if they talked about oxygen system problems and hypoxia. 148 Captain Jeff Haney died in November 2010 when his oxygen was cut off and he crashed at faster than the speed of sound in the Alaska wilderness. The Air Force blamed Haney, but his sister disagreed. 149

Above, I mentioned the possibility of Fukushima being a synergy experiment. Is the creation of an entropic environment intentional? Not only do chemical trails loaded with conductive metal oxides provide an excellent multiplier effect on nuclear nanoparticles (Wigner black dust) created by the fission/fusion of plutonium and uranium, but ionospheric heaters like HAARP can heat radioactive plumes and eddies to create “fences” around populations or conduits for direct targeting of populations. 

Waveform energy can be used to exert force at a distance. Pulse high energy into matter and it will change. 

RADIATION AND FRACKING 

Jets and rockets lay trails of metal nanoparticles that eventually filter into our lungs and brain, food and water, then orbit above the Earth in a Saturn-like “ring.” Big Oil’s hydraulic fracturing (fracking) is the practice of pumping water, sand and chemical lubricants to keep the sand flowing underground to split rock containing profitable oil and gas. But it plays its part in the Space Fence as well once compounds are injected deep in the Earth and “thumped” (pulsed) with a corresponding resonant frequency. 

Al + Fe2O3 AlO2 + Fe3 is used to perforate oil well casings prior to fracking with a C-4 (explosive) 150 detonation-forced ignition. Compare this compound with the Ba(NO3 )2 + AlO2 + Fe2O3 + O in the atmosphere hours after chemical spraying 151 and you’ll see that the chemical “trade secrets” of aviation fuel and hydraulic fracturing fluids are in sync. Environmentalists have tried for decades to discover the formulae for the fracking lubricants polluting land and water much as jet fuel and aerial chemical spraying are polluting the air and entire biosphere. 152 In 2014, North Carolina went so far as to pass the Energy Modernization Act (SB786) making disclosure of fracking trade secrets a Class I felony. 153 

Fifty-five percent of the 40,000 fracking wells drilled in the U.S. since 2011 are in areas of prolonged drought, thanks to the billions of gallons of water fracking requires—and not counting the billions of gallons of oilfield wastewater fluids loaded with chemicals that have to be disposed of. Is it any wonder that fracking has been implicated in the increase of earthquakes, sinkholes, and salt dome collapses? In Oklahoma, where there are 35,000 active wastewater disposal wells, earthquakes measuring 3.0 or greater reached 890 in 2015 alone. In 2008—the year before oil companies began using fracking—only two earthquakes occurred. 

Then there are methane releases: 

A Cornell University scientist’s claims that oil and gas development is so harmful to the climate that methane emissions and oil and gas production in general need to be cut back immediately to avoid a “global catastrophe”. . .[Environmental biology professor Robert Howarth]. . .concluded that the climate impact of natural gas produced from shale—most of which involves hydraulic fracturing, or fracking—may be worse than that of coal and crude oil. That’s because methane leaks from natural gas production have a greater effect on the climate than carbon dioxide emissions, Howarth said. 154 

Fracked gas contains radioactive radon, and venting radon means releasing methane. It takes ten half lives (8.3 days = 1 half-life) for radon to decay enough to be safe, and yet it’s being pumped to market immediately for people’s homes, while radon “well brine” is spread over roads before snow and ice storms. 155 Tons of hot radioactive waste in the “orphan” waste stream (brine, sludge, rock, soiled equipment, etc.) ends up in landfills in trash bags. Why? Because Big Oil has always had the privilege of self-reporting, self-regulating, and writing off taxes. 

But the worst news yet may be that burying radioactive waste in the hydrocarbon-poor shale of already-fractured deep underground rock is under consideration. The 2014 proposal by U.S. Geological Survey hydrologist Chris Neuzi 156 is made to sound like it’s “in the future,” but the truth is it may already be underway. And it’s been done before. In “Oilmen Help Dump Radioactive Waste” (San Antonio Express/News of May 3, 1964), we learn that Halliburton Company and Union Carbide Corporation 

. . .combined the oil well cementing technique with the hydraulic fracturing production stimulation technique [i.e. fracking] to entomb radioactive wastes in an impermeable shale formation a thousand feet underground. . .Union Carbide Corporation which operates facilities at Oak Ridge [National Laboratory] for the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, and Halliburton, which provides specialized oilfield services such as cementing and fracturing worldwide, have collaborated on the project since 1960. 157 

Radiation in hidden places synergizing with what falls from the sky to be breathed, grown as food and imbibed as water. Evil in the guise of profit-hungry corporations stalks the land . . .

Notes- Preface

1 Dylan Stableford, “TWA Flight 800 crash not due to gas tank explosion, former investigators say.” Yahoo! News, June 18, 2013. Later that year, American Airlines bought out TWA. 

2 Jenny O’Connor, “Colombia’s Agent Orange?” CounterPunch, October 31, 2012. Plan Colombia, begun in 2000, has cost the U.S. billions in the name of the Drug War. Its purpose, however—according to Peter Dale Scott’s Foreword to the 2011 book Cocaine, Death Squads and the War on Terror: U.S. Imperialism and Class Struggle in Colombia by Oliver Villar and Drew Cottle (Monthly Review Press)—is “to target specific enemies and thus ensure that the drug traffic remains under the control of those traffickers who are allies of the Colombian state security apparatus and/or the CIA.” 

3 Wikipedia. 

4 Sabin Russell, “S.F. man’s astounding photo / Mysterious purple streak is shown hitting Columbia 7 before it disintegrated.” San Francisco Chronicle, February 5, 2003. Also see Michael E. Salla, Ph.D., “Photographic Analysis Confirms that Space Shuttle Columbia was Destroyed by a Plasma Beam Weapon,” Exopolitics.org, October 19, 2007. 

5 Judy Wood, Ph.D. Where Did the Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11. 2005. 

6 Physicist savant John Hutchison (1945–) studied Tesla’s electrogravitic and longitudinal wave work and that of Thomas Townsend Brown (1905–1985), George Piggott (“Overcoming Gravitation”), Francis E. Nipper (1847–1926), and Martin L. Perl (1927–). 

7 Leonard David, “Taking the twist out of a twister.” Space.com, March 3, 2000. 

8 Carolyn Williams Palit, “The Direct Energy Age.” NoExoticWarfareZone, October 2005: “The smaller beams from psychotronic scalar weapons being used on Americans are very related to the big holographic scalar weapons used on 9/11.” 

9 Wood, Where Did the Towers Go? 

10 Ibid. 

11 Email, October 4, 2016. 

12 Ned Resnikoff, “’Homeland Security’ has received $791 billion since 9/11.” msnbc, March 1, 2013. 

13 Bob Fitrakis, “Battelle Exposed In Anthrax Biochemical Conspiracy.” FreePress.org, January 14, 2002. 

14 Battelle had hired William C. Patrick III, a bioweapons expert, to study how anthrax behaves when sent through the mail. On August 1, 2008, Dr. Bruce E. Ivins, another anthrax suspect, was “suicided”; two months later on October 1, 2010, Patrick died. See Fitrakis’ “Ghoulish And Secretive Biowarfare Expert William C. Patrick III Dead,” at fraudster bob.com, October 17, 2010. 

15 A director of research at ECOlogic Corporation, a software engineering firm, was also on AA77. ECOlogic worked on data systems for NASA. 

16 “Cooking” = zapping with radio frequency or microwaves. 

17 Kevin Ryan, “Energetic Materials as a Potential Cause of the 9/11 First Responder Illnesses.” Foreign Policy Journal, February 4, 2011; reference to JM Moline et al., “Multiple Myeloma in World Trade Center Responders: A Case Series.” Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine 51(8): 896–902, 2009.

Introduction

1 Tyler Durden, “While Blaming Trump for ‘Arms Race,’ Obama Signs Momentous ‘Star Wars II’ Defense Bill.” Zero Hedge, December 24, 2016. 

2 Jamie Condliffe, “Geoengineering Gets Green Light from Federal Scientists.” MIT Technology Review, January 11, 2017. 

3 “A Massive ‘Blob’ of Abnormal Conditions in the Pacific Has Increased Ozone Levels.” ScienceAlert, 17 February 2017. 

4 “Planetary waves, first found on Earth, are discovered on Sun.” PhysOrg, March 27, 2017. 

5 T.I. Gombosi et al., “Anthropogenic Space Weather.” Space Science Reviews, 13 April 2017. 

6 “NASA Space Probes Have Detected a Human-Made Barrier Surrounding Earth.” ScienceAlert, 18 May 2017. 

7 BPEarthWatch, “4 Unidentified Objects Take Out Satellite / On Radar!” July 2, 2017, www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQ6xsqhDTaU. 

8 Eric Berger, “A satellite may be falling apart in geostationary orbit.” ArsTechnica, July 2, 2017. 

9 Bob Fredericks, “Trump signs executive order reviving National Space Council.” New York Post, June 30, 2017. 

10 Jeremy Herb, “House passes defense bill that would create ‘Space Corps.’” CNN, July 14, 2017. 

11 The Joint Intelligence Objectives Agency (JIOA) circumvented then-President Truman’s anti-Nazi order by scrubbing Nazi affiliations and granting them new identities and security clearances. 

12 Col. Tamzy J. House et al. “Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025,” August 1996. “2025 is a study designed to comply with a directive from the chief of staff of the Air Force to examine the concepts, capabilities, and technologies the United States will require to remain the dominant air and space force in the future.” 

13 Tesla: “Man could tap the breast of Mother Sun and release her energy toward Earth as needed, magnetic as well as light.” 

14 Robert E. Morrison, Specialist in Earth Sciences, Science Policy Research Division, Congressional Research Service, “Chapter 5: Federal Activities in Weather Modification.” Weather Modification: Programs, Problems, Policy, and Potential. U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, November 15, 1978. 

15 P. Gosselin, “Atmospheric CO2 Concentrations At 400 PPM Are Still Dangerously Low For Life On Earth.” NoTricksZone, 17 May 2013. 

16 “Deserts ‘greening’ from rising CO2 .” Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO), 3 July 2013. 

17 Juliet Eilperin, “Geoengineering sparks international ban, first-ever congressional report.” Washington Post, October 29, 2010. 

18 Rady Ananda, “Solar Radiation Management, Geoengineering and Chemtrails.” Global Research, November 5, 2013. 

19 “Chemtrails Confirmed: Climate Scientist Admits Jets Are ‘Dumping Aerosols.’” Chemtrailsplanet.net, January 9, 2015. 

20 “NASA Scientist Admits ‘Chemtrails’ Are Real.” Chemtrailsplanet.net, March 11, 2016. 

21 Christina Sarich, “Italian Senator Calls for Declassification of Chemtrail Documents.” Naturalsociety.com, April 15, 2014. 

22 “Minister pledges probe into chemtrails,” Cyprus-mail.com, February 17, 2016. 

23 J.D. Heyes, “NOAA quietly revises website after getting caught in global warming lie, admitting 1936 was hotter than 2012.” Naturalnews.com, July 1, 2014. 

24 David Lewis, “EPA’s disturbing leadership.” The Oconee Enterprise, May 12, 2016. 

25 Alan Levin, “NTSB: Ted Stevens’ plane crash remains a mystery.” USA Today, May 24, 2011. 

26 Ari Phillips, “Canadian Government Dismantles Ecological Libraries After Dismissing Thousands of Scientists.” Climate Progress, January 10, 2014. 

27 “World Leaders Sign Paris Climate Agreement.” Huffington Post, April 22, 2016. The article closed with “a group of businesses, including Google, Ikea, Starbucks and General Mills, lent their support to the signing ceremony.” 

28 Sarah Malm, “UN planning an ‘international tribunal of climate justice’ which would allow nations to take developed countries to court.” Daily Mail, 2 November 2015. 

29 Liz Ford, “Global goals received with rapture in New York — now comes the hard part.” The Guardian, 25 September 2015. 

30 “The Netherlands takes over meteorology for the NATO Response Force.” SHAPE (Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe) press release, 13 January 2016. 

31 Jocelyn Timperley, “Academics call for geoengineering preparation in wake of Paris Agreement’s ‘deadly flaws.’” BusinessGreen, 11 January 2016. 

32 James Corbett, “And Now For The 100 Trillion Dollar Bankster Climate Swindle . . .” The Corbett Report, February 24, 2016. 

33 Tyler Durden, “Deutsche Bank Sued For Running An ‘International Criminal Organization’ in Italian Court.” Zerohedge.com, May 18, 2017. 

34 Jacob Levich, “The Real Agenda of the Gates Foundation.” Aspects of India’s Economy, No. 57, May 2014. 

35 Paul Harris, “They’re called the Good Club — and they want to save the world.” The Guardian, 30 May 2009. 

36 William J. Broad, “Billionaires With Big Ideas Are Privatizing American Science.” New York Times, March 15, 2014. 

37 Daniel Barker, “Nations are now using weather modification as clandestine warfare, CIA warns.” NaturalNews.com, December 19, 2015. 

38 CIA Document #1035-960, “Concerning Criticism of the Warren Report,” 1967. 

39 Charles Eisenstein, “The Need For Venture Science.” Huntington Post, August 27, 2015. 

40 Ibid.

41 Sean Adl-Tabatabai, “Nearly All Scientific Papers Controlled By Same Six Corporations.” YourNewsWire.com, July 20, 2015. 

42 Mark J. Harper, “Dead Scientists and Microbiologists — Master List,” February 5, 2005, rense.com/general62/list.htm. 

43 Erin Elizabeth, “A Connection with the Holistic Doctor Deaths?” HealthNutNews.com, February 1, 2016. 

44 Amy Chozick et al., “Leaked Speech Excerpts Show a Hillary Clinton at Ease With Wall Street.” New York Times, October 7, 2016. 

45 Patrick Wood, “NAU Reborn As ‘North American Climate, Clean Energy and Environment Partnership’.” Technocracy News, June 30, 2016. 

46 Quoted in Planet Earth: The Latest Weapon of War by Rosalie Bertell (Black Rose, 2001). 

7 Stephen J. Crothers, “A Critical Analysis of Ligo’s Recent Detection of Gravitational Waves Caused by Merging Black Holes.” viXra.com, March 8, 2016. 

48 Sarah Kaplan, “Scientists claimed they found elusive ‘Planet X.’ Doubting astronomers are in an uproar.” Washington Post, December 11, 2015. 

49 John Roach, “Insurer’s Message: “Prepare for Climate Change or Get Sued.” NBC News, June 6, 2014

chapter 1

1.Col. Tamzy J. House et al. “Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025.” Air Force 2025, “a study designed to comply with a directive from the chief of staff of the Air Force to examine the concepts, capabilities, and technologies the United States will require to remain the dominant air and space force in the future,” August 1996. 

2 Formed after 9/11 by then-Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. 

3 Utibe Effiong and Richard L. Neitzel, “Assessing the direct occupational and public health impacts of solar radiation management with stratospheric aerosols.” Environmental Health, January 19, 2016. 

4 “An Airline Manager’s Statement,” May 22, 2000, carnicominstitute.org/articles/mgr1.htm. 

5 Plasma, the fourth state of matter throughout the universe, including our Sun and lightning; a strong electromagnetic field applied by laser or microwave generator. 

6 Bernard Eastlund, Patent US20070238252 A1 “Cosmic particle ignition of artificially ionized plasma patterns in the atmosphere,” October 11, 2007. (Eastlund died exactly two months later on December 12, 2007.)

 7 “UK floods: Storm Frank threatens more misery.” BBC News, 29 December 2015. 

8 Email from Christopher Fontenot, August 1, 2016. See “Solar Perturbation via Ionospheric Manipulation of Schumann Resonance” at his site, amicrowavedplanet.com/solar-perturbation-via-ionospheric-manipulation-of-schumann-resonance/. Fontenot has extensive training in nuclear and electrical engineering. Now, his primary interest is in the Electric Universe Theory and its implications. 

9 “Gigantic Gravity Waves to Mix Summer With Winter? Wrecked Jet Stream Now Runs From Pole-to-Pole.” RobertScribbler.com, June 28, 2016. 

10 A terawatt is equal to a trillion watts or 10 12 . 

11 “HAARP-Like Ionospheric Research Project Underway at Arecibo Observatory.” ARRL, April 23, 2014. Interestingly, the Arecibo Observatory Amateur Radio Club, KP4AO, is headquartered at the research facility. 

12 See dutchsinse.com/4202015-five-new-haarp-type-arrays-being-built-norway-shutting-down-fm-radio-the-real-reason-why/, April 20, 2015. 

13 Whereas whistler waves are from lightning discharges zapping along the Earth’s magnetic lines of force, Alfvén waves are lowfrequency and fluid-like—like plasma. 

14 Dennis Papadopoulos, “Using Active Experiments to Probe Geo-space.” Third International Conference, “The Mechanics of the Magnetospheric System and Effects on the Polar Regions,” October 27–November 1, 2013.

15 Ibid. 

16 “NASA proposes shield around Mars to aid human colonization.” RT.com, 7 March 2017. 

17 E. Kolesnikova et al., “Excitation of Alfvén waves by modulated HF heating of the ionosphere, with application to FAST observations.” Annales Geophysicae, (2002) 20: 57–67. 

18 Begich, Dr. Nick and Jeanne Manning, Angels Don’t Play This HAARP: Advances in Tesla Technology. Earthpulse Press, 1995, 2002.

19 Emails from Billy Hayes, “The HAARP Man”:July 27, 2015: “Just a month ago, I witnessed fellow tower workers onsite at HAARP Gakona making new modifications to the HAARP site: antenna rigging has been replaced, new balum transformers, upgrades of transmitters and trailers (frequency alterations) by P&R Towers subcontracting with DARPA / Raytheon, pursuant to the takeover of the site by University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF). The site was and has been maintained black [classified] without power from an outside source since August 2013. On June 1, 2015, external power was re-applied (same time the Pecan Project was applied).” August 21, 2015: “They’ve been doing safety burns around the site this week; can see the smoke plumes by satellite. Don’t forget: next turn-on for UAF Gakona is on August 25.” 

20 Ionospheric heaters are even on space-based ionospheric sounders. See R.F. Benson, “Topside sounders as mobile ionospheric heaters.” NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS), January 1, 2006. 

21 Executive Summary. 

22 www.viewzone.com/harp.exec.html. 

23 Peter Koert, “Artificial ionospheric mirror composed of a plasma layer which can be tilted.” US 5041834 A, Apti, Inc., May 17, 1990. 

24 A decade is a factor of 10 difference between two numbers—an order of magnitude measured on a logarithmic scale. 

25 Executive Summary. 

26 Jerry E. Smith, HAARP: The Ultimate Weapon of the Conspiracy. Adventures Unlimited, 1998.

 27 Electrojet: electric current traveling around the layer of the ionosphere 56–93 miles above the Earth.

28 “Simulations of Hurricane Sandy with warmer ocean temperatures resulted in storms more than twice as destructive as Sandy, according to new research.” University of Maryland, January 22, 2016. 

29 Ibid. 

30 Facebook, October 24, 2015. 

31 James Pressley, “Hitler’s Chemists Chased Auschwitz Profits, Financed Mengele.” Bloomberg News, August 8, 2008; a review of Hell’s Cartel: I.G. Farben and the Making of Hitler’s War Machine by Diarmuid Jeffreys (Metropolitan Books, 2008).

32 Watch “NASA Scientist Answers Questions About Chemtrails,” July 18, 2013, www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xz1Gt5moxvw. 

33 www.boldmethod.com/learn-to-fly/weather/contrails/. 

34 globalskywatch.com/stories/my-chemtrail-story/chemtrail-information/plumes-change.html#.V3fj0lc-gfN 

35 Eric J. Jensen and Owen B. Toon, “Cirrus Cloud and Climate Modifications due to Subsonic Aircraft Exhaust.” NASA, geo.arc.nasa.gov/sge/jskiles/fliers/all_flier_prose/cirrusclouds_jensen/cirrusclouds_jensen.html. 

36 Mark Hucko, “System and Method of Control of the Terrestrial Climate and Its Protection against Warming and Climatic Catastrophes Caused by Warming such as Hurricanes.” Patent US20090032214 A1, June 2, 2008. 

37 See “High Bypass Turbofan Jet Engine” YouTube, catagd, February 12, 2014. 

38 “EPA calls for regulating emissions from US airliners.” Fox News, June 10, 2015. 

39 Michael Biesecker, “Environmental groups sue over pollution from airliners.” AP, April 12, 2016. Also see “EPA calls for regulating emissions from US airliners.” Fox News, June 10, 2015. 

40 Bloomberg Business. Activist Harold Saive (chemtrailsplanet.net) begs to differ: “It’s worse than 3% since almost all CO2 emissions are released above 30,000 feet and cannot be readily converted and eliminated by photosynthesis” (June 17, 2015). 

41 “Aircraft Geared Architecture Reduces Fuel Cost and Noise,” NASA Technology Transfer Program, Spinoff 2015. 

42 “Fulcrum BioEnergy proves trash-to-jet fuel method, gets DOD grant.” Fulcrum BioEnergy press release, May 28, 2013. 

43 Jim Lee, “Chemtrails: The Shady Truth About Contrails.” climateviewer.com/chemtrails/ 

44 “Aviation and the Global Atmosphere: 3.2.3. Soot and Metal Particles,” Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/sres/aviation/index.php?idp=35 

45 Jim Lee, “1978 ENMOD Convention on the Prohibition of Military and Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques,” January 22, 2016, climateviewer.com/2016/01/22/1978-enmod-convention-on-the-prohibition-of-military-and-other-hostile-use-ofenvironmental-modification-techniques/. 

46 The U.S. Navy proposal to develop new weather modification weapons, Code C2741 (Warhead Development Branch) NAWCWPNS, China Lake, California, April 1994, www.scribd.com/doc/256210692/Weather-Modification-US-Navy-FOIA-Nonlethal-Warfare-Proposal1994; and the U.S. Air Force proposal to develop a theater-scale weather modification system using carbon black, Phillips Laboratory (AFMC) Geophysics Directorate, www.scribd.com/doc/184741384/Weather-Modification-Using-Carbon-Black-Phillips-Laboratory-AFMCGeophysics-Directorate. 

47 Tamzy J. House et al. “Weather As A Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025,” Air Force 2025, August 1996; see page 34, Figure 5-2, “A Systems Development Road Map to Weather Modification in 2025.” csat.au.af.mil/2025/volume3/vol3ch15.pdf. 

48 Jim Lee, “US military discusses future of Weather Warfare despite ENMOD ban,” November 16, 2013, climateviewer.com/2013/11/16/us-military-discusses-future-of-weather-warfare-despite-enmod-ban/. 

49 William M. Gray, “Feasibility of beneficial hurricane modification by carbon dust seeding,” Paper No. 196, NOAA Grant No. N-22-65- 73 (G), April 1973; William M. Frank, “Characteristics of carbon black dust as a large-scale tropospheric heat source,” Paper No. 195, National Science Foundation, January 1973. 

50 Jim Lee, “Hurricane Hacking: The Department of Homeland Security enters the weather modification business,” November 8, 2013, climateviewer.com/2013/11/08/hurricane-hacking-the-department-of-homeland-security-enters-the-weather-modification-business/ 51 “Hurricane Aerosol and Microphysics Program (HAMP)” YouTube of a speech by chairman and cloud physicist William R. Cotton at the 29th Conference on Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorology, May 10, 2010, www.youtube.com/watch?v=z72TJ68zKJE; and Scott A. Braun et al., “NASA’s Genesis and Rapid Intensification Processes (GRIP) field experiment.” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 94.3 (2013): 345–363. 

52 Jim Lee, “World’s First EPA Public Hearing on Flight Pollution! Speak Now!” climateviewer.com/2015/07/26/worlds-first-epa-publichearing-on-flight-pollution-speak-now/. 

53 Jim Lee, “My Speech to the EPA about Flight Pollution,” climateviewer.com/2015/08/09/my-speech-to-the-epa-about-flight-pollution/. 

54 “EPA Finalizes First Steps to Address Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Aircraft Engines,” EPA Office of Transportation and Air Quality, July 2016, www3.epa.gov/otaq/documents/aviation/420f16036.pdf.

55 Boucher, O. “Atmospheric science: Seeing through contrails.” Nature Climate Change 1, 24–25 (2011). 

56 Robock, Alan, et al. “Benefits, risks, and costs of stratospheric geoengineering.” Geophysical Research Letters 36.19 (2009). 

57 Ulrich Schumann, German Aerospace Center, “Recent research results on the climate impact of contrail cirrus and mitigation options.” ICAO Colloquium on Aviation and Climate Change, 2010. 

58 Z.Z. Kapadia, et al. “Impacts of aviation fuel sulfur content on climate and human health.” Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions 15.13 (2015): 18921–18961. 

59 Bruce Anderson, “Alternative-Fuel Effects on Contrails & Cruise EmiSSions (ACCESS-2) Flight Experiment.” NASA LaRC and the ACCESS-II Science and Implementation Teams, January 2015; and Richard H. Moore et al. “In-Situ Measurements of Contrail Properties Measured During the 2013–2014 ACCESS Project,” 14th Conference on Cloud Physics, July 2014. 

60 Stevie Borrello, “Mysterious Tar-Like Substance Coats Homes in Michigan Neighborhood.” ABC News, February 17, 2016.

61 W.M. Gray et al. “Weather Modification by Carbon Dust Absorption of Solar Energy.” Atmospheric Science Paper No. 225, July 1974. 62 See “Carbon Black Chemtrails Weaponized Hurricane Sandy and Katrina,” www.aircrap.org/2015/01/20/carbon-black-chemtrailsweaponized-hurricane-sandy-and-katrina/.

63 Email, 24 February 2014. 

64 “UI study: Carbon black nanoparticles activate immune cells, causing cell death.” nanotechwire.com, May 19, 2011. 

65 J. Curtius et al., “First direct sulfuric acid detection in the exhaust plume of a jet.” Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 25, No. 6, March 15, 1998. 

66 Cyclone classifiers can be used to reduce aerosol coal fly ash to nano sizes (smaller than 1 micron) for additional loft time.

6 7 Email to Harold Saive and cc’d to Elana Freeland, April 29, 2017.

68 Coal ash impoundments were exempted from the 1970s rules monitoring coal slurry storage sites. At slurries, coal is separated from noncombustible ash. 

69 “EPA Refuses To Classify Coal Fly Ash As a Hazardous Waste, Primary Toxic Component of Chemical Geoengineering.” State of the Nation, August 19, 2015. 

70 Ben Whitford, “Coal ash: America’s multibillion-ton toxic legacy.” Ecologist, 29 September 2015.

 71 Ibid. 

72 J. Marvin Herndon, “Human Environmental Dangers Posted by Ongoing Global Tropospheric Aerosolized Particulates for Weather Modification.” Frontiers in Public Health, June 30, 2016.

73 J. Marvin Herndon and Mark Whiteside, “Further Evidence of Coal Fly Ash Utilization in Tropospheric Geoengineering: Implications on Human and Environmental Health.” Journal of Geography, Environment and Earth Science International, 3 February 2017. 

74 One wonders what relationship this “snow” had to chemically nucleated “snow” that burns instead of melts. See YouTube “Shouldn’t Snowballs Melt?!?” MrGregory1957, January 30, 2014. 

75 Herndon, “Human Environmental Dangers.” 

76iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/045102/fulltext/;jsessionid=8566D916C275074AD64F27443B2F1127.c4.iopscience.cld.iop.org

 77 Email, April 28, 2017. 

78 www.youtube.com/watch?v=EOP03gHBSHo

79 www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQsdk7i0pSU&feature=youtu.be 

80 “WMO 2015 - Climate Warming Response to Cirrus Cloud Seeding by Trude Storelvmo,” speaking at the American Meteorological Society meeting in 2015, youtu.be/cncVgSkjVtM?t=4m37s. 

81 Also see Fitrakis’ March 28, 2002 Columbus Alive article, “Into Thin Air: How Kucinich’s ‘chemtrails’ disappeared . . . from right under Congress’ nose!” Fitrakis ran for Franklin County Prosecutor in November 2016. 

82 Thomas’ 2004 book Chemtrails Confirmed was one of the first go-to books on chemtrails. 

83 This paper can be found at www.aquarius-technologies.de/download/TheChemistryinContrails.pdf minus several pages added to the version in Dangerous Imagination, Silent Assimilation by Cara St. Louis and Harald Kautz-Vella, White Lion Press (2014). 

84 Biophotons are DNA send-and-receive single photons responsible for cell communication. 

85 See Hendrik K. Kammler et al., “Flame Pyrolysis of Nanoparticles. WILEY-VCH Chem. Eng. Technol. 24 (2001) 6; and M. Enhessari et al., “Synthesis and characterization of barium strontium titanate (BST) micro/nanostructures prepared by improved methods.” Int. Journal Nano. Dim. 2(2):85-103, Autumn 2011.

86 Thomas M. Miller et al. “Mass distribution and concentrations of negative chemi-ions in the exhaust of a jet engine; Sulfuric acid concentrations and observation of particle growth.” Air Force Research Laboratory, 11 January 2005. 

87 “Stratospheric Welsbach seeding for reduction of global warming, US 500316 A,” Hughes Aircraft Company, April 23, 1990. 

88 Jim Phelps, DOEWatch 2003 web page; mirrored at www.chemtrailcentral.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/001839.html. See www.doewatch.com/whistleblowing/ for Phelps biographical information and photos. 

89 See YouTube of “New NASA Methane Jet Engine,” www.popscreen.com/v/5WeMj/New-Nasa-Methane-Jet-Engine. 

90 For example, two studies by Mark Purdey: “Elevated silver, barium and strontium in antlers, vegetation and soils sourced from CWD [chronic waste disease]: Do Ag/Ba/Sr piezoelectric crystals represent the transmissible pathogenic agent in TSEs?” Medical Hypotheses, 2004:63(2):211–25; and “Metal microcrystal pollutants: The heat resistant, transmissible nucleating agents that initiate the pathogenesis of TSEs.” Medical Hypotheses, 2005:65[3]:448–477. 

91 Kautz-Vella and Hauksdottir, “The Chemistry of Contrails.” 

92 Ibid. 

93 Ibid. 

94 See Carsten Lassen, “Survey of PFOS, PFOA and other perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkylsubstances.” LOUS Review, November 27, 2012. 

95 Oak Ridge whistleblower scientist Jim Phelps adds SF6, an asphyxiant soluble in ethanol and added to jet fuel because it is pyrophoric. It is particularly hazardous because it replaces oxygen. YouTube “Jim Phelps Scientist Chemtrails,” September 1, 2012. 

96 “Unfiltered Breathed In: The Truth about Aerotoxic Syndrome,” a 2015 documentary by Tim van Beveren, www.unfilteredbreathedin.com. 

97 G. Ritchie et al. “Biological and health effects of exposure to kerosene-based jet fuels and performance additives.” Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, July-August 2003. 

98 “Above-cloud Aerosols Affect Climate, Say Scientists.” The New Indian Express, 2 April 2015. 

99 “Clouds caused by aircraft exhaust may warm the U.S. climate.” NASA news release, April 27, 2004. 

100 William R. Cotton, “Weather and Climate Engineering,” lecture at the Perturbed Clouds in the Climate System forum, the Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies (FAS) in Germany, March 2008. 

101 “A semiconductor is a substance, usually a solid chemical element or compound, that can conduct electricity under some conditions but not others, making it a good medium for the control of electrical current. Its conductance varies depending on the current or voltage applied to a control electrode, or on the intensity of irradiation by infrared (IR), visible light, ultraviolet (UV), or X rays.” — WhatIs.com 

102 “A capacitor (capacitance) is a passive electronic component that stores energy in the form of an electrostatic field.” — WhatIs.com 

103 In electronics and radio, microwave cavities consisting of hollow metal boxes are used in microwave transmitters, receivers and test equipment to control frequency, in place of the tuned circuits used at lower frequencies. — Wikipedia, “Resonator” 

104 Conversation with Billy Hayes “The HAARP Man.” 

105 Christopher A. Shaw et al. “Aluminum-Induced Entropy in Biological Systems: Implications for Neurological Disease.” Journal of Toxicology, Vol. 2014, Article ID491316. Is the rise in cancer connected? “Cancer cases worldwide are predicted to increase by 70 percent over the next two decades, from 14 million in 2012 to 25 million new cases a year, according to the World Health Organization.” — The Guardian, February 3, 2014. 

106 Sunandan Pakrashi et al., “Ceriodaphnia dubia as a Potential Bio-Indicator for Assessing Acute Aluminum Oxide Nanoparticle Toxicity in Fresh Water Environment.” PLOS ONE, September 5, 2013. 

107 Rob Manning, “Portland Air Monitors Find More Toxic Chromium, But Source Unknown.” Opb.org, April 21, 2016. 

108 Brett Israel, “Man-made pollutants significantly influence how tree emissions form aerosol particles.” Phys.org, December 30, 2014.

109 Competition and politics are fierce around Space X. The September 1, 2016 explosion of the Falcon 9 rocket carrying the Amos 6 satellite appears to have been sabotage, a possibility Western media have buried. Asian press believes it was an X-37B “UFO.” See the YouTube “Space X UFO Explosion – Slow Motion!” by Graphics King, September 1, 2016. 

110 See “Orion: Trial By Fire,” www.nasa.gov/press/2014/october/nasa-premieres-trial-by-fire-video-on-orion-s-flight-test. 

111 Ian O’Neill, “Private Mars Mission in 2018?” NewsDiscovery.com, February 21, 2013. 112 “Iron fertilization project stirs West Coast controversy,” CBC News, October 16, 2012. 

113 Simon Yu, “Scientists Find Link Between Ocean Bacteria and Atmosphere.” UCSD Guardian, May 31, 2015. 114 See physicist Paul Beckwith’s video “Oxygen Level Decrease in Air from Climate Change,” February 26, 2016. 

115 Her research papers can be found at www.researchgate.net/profile/Tiffany_Moisan/publications. She was a friend of Billy Hayes, “The HAARP Man.” Authorities insisted there was no foul play.

116 The source seems to have been removed from the Web. However, articles on Emanuel’s studies can be easily found, such as “Cooking up a Storm — A Recipe For Disaster?” PRI’s Environmental News Magazine, May 28, 2010.

117 John Weier, “Every cloud has a filthy lining.” NASA, September 30, 1999.

118 Philip A. Durkee et al. “The Monterey Area Ship Track Experiment.” Naval Postgraduate School, August 15, 2008.

119 See PaulJ. DeMott et al., “Sea spray aerosol as a unique source of ice nucleating particles.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, December 17, 2015.

120 V. Gopalakrishnan et al. “Intermediate ion formation in the ship’s exhaust.” Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 32, May 2005.

121 See the YouTube “Lithium Reacts with Water,” Sully Science, October 4, 2009. 

122 Jon LeSage, “Lithium from salt water could make batteries, and EVs, less expensive.” AutoBlog, September 30, 2012. 

123 Ann Fillmore, Ph.D. “Aerosol Experiments Using Lithium and Psychoactive Drugs Over Oregon.” PositiveHealthOnline, Issue 228, February 2016. 

124 “Manufactured Louisiana Flood 8-14-16” YouTube, 15:07. Please read his e-book No Natural Weather: Introduction to Geoengineering 101.

125 Email, August 17, 2016. Please view WeatherWar101’s NexRad YouTubes, as well. 

126 The YouTube “Louisiana (August 2016) – Geo-engineered Flooding” by, August 15, 2016 exposes minute-by-minute power plant vapor releases feeding the Louisiana flood system. 

127 Joe Whitworth, “Nanosilver concerns raised by researchers.” Food Quality News, 10 March 2014. 

128 Clint Richardson, “Geoengineering and Cloud Seeding Statutes.” RealityBlog, November 25, 2011. 

129 “Autonomous cloud seeding aircraft successfully tested in Nevada.” Globe Newswire, February 24, 2016.

130 “As tornadoes cause deaths, cloud seeders claim success.” Stop Chemical Terrorism, April 2015. 

131 Will Ockenden, “Hydro Tasmania asked to explain cloud seeding in catchment day before flooding.” ABCNews.au, 10 June 2016. 

132 “China offers its cloud seeding technology for parched Maharashtra,” India TV News, May 29, 2016.

133 “More airplane needed for weather modification in Indonesia: BPPT.” Antara News, 26 March 2014.

134 Sarah Zhang, “For 50 Years Now, the U.S. Has Had a Nuclear Reactor Orbiting in Space.” Gizmodo, April 4, 2015.

135 “Kilopower for space exploration,” World Nuclear News, December 2014.

136 Jeanna Bryner, “Space Fuel: Plutonium-238 Created After 30-Year Wait.” Live Science, December 30, 2015 

137 Henry Brean and Keith Rogers, “Investigators taking close look at radioactive waste dump fire.” Las Vegas Review-Journal, October 19, 2015. “In 2010, the EPA fined US Ecology nearly $500,000 for 18 hazardous waste violations.”

138 Julia Calderone, “Here’s why airline crewmembers are classified as radiation workers.” Tech Insider, November 19, 2015. 

139 Christopher J. Mertens, NASA Langley Research Center, et al. “Atmospheric Ionizing Radiation from Galactic and Solar Cosmic Rays,” Chapter 31 in Current Topics in Ionizing Radiation Research, ed. Mitsuru Nenoi, March 9, 2012. 

140 The HAARP creation of the March 11, 2011 Fukushima event was exactly sixty-six years after Hiroshima and Nagasaki. View YouTube “Leuren Moret: Fukushima radiation is intentional extermination that HAARP Tesla technology can reverse,” Alfred Lambremont Webre, June 9, 2014. 141 A becquerel (Bq) is equal to one disintegration or nuclear transformation per second. 142 “Top Official: Over 60 million Japanese irradiated by Fukushima – Nuclear Expert: 50,000 sq. miles of Japan highly contaminated . . . Many millions need to be evacuated . . . Gov’t has decided to sacrifice them, it’s a serious crime – TV: More than 70% of the country contaminated by radiation (VIDEOS).” ENENews, April 12, 2016. 

143 Lucas Tomlinson, “Military jet crashes on rise as some cite training and fleet issues.” FoxNews.com, September 2, 2016. 

144 Swordmakers temper steel with heat and pressure to align the steel’s crystalline structure and add carbon. 

145 “More Young People Dying of Cardiac Arrest.” ABCNews, March 1, 2016. 

146 Matt McNulty, “Collapse at Brooklyn Bridge injures 5 people.” New York Post, July 2, 2014. 

147 The Air Force had paid Lockheed Martin $79 billion for 187 Raptors, each jet costing $420 million. 

148 Bill Bartel, “Pilot’s career stalls after criticizing oxygen system.” The Virginian-Pilot, April 20, 2014. 

149 Lee Ferran and Megan Chuchmach, “Fighter Pilots Claim Intimidation Over F-22 Raptor Jets.” ABC News, May 7, 2012. 

150 C-4 is a plastic explosive with a modeling clay texture.

151 Thanks to Billy Hayes “The HAARP Man” for this chemical insight.

 152 “Fracking chemicals to stay ‘trade secrets.’” RT, 28 March 2013.

 153 “North Carolina law would make discussing fracking chemicals illegal.” RT, 20 May 2014.

154 Bobby Magill, “‘Catastrophe’ Claim Adds Fuel to Methane Debate.” Climate Central, May 15, 2014. 

155 Thanks to June 21, 2016 comment by Paul Robert Roden at “Hot mess:states struggle to deal with radioactive fracking waste” by Jie Jenny Zou, The Center for Public Integrity, June 20, 2016. 

156 Eric Roston, “Not Into Fracking? How About Some Nuclear Waste?” Bloomberg.com, March 17, 2014. Also see the 2012 patent US 20140221722 A1, “Abyssalsequestration of nuclear waste and other types of hazardous waste” by Leonid Germanovich et al. 

157 Phoenix, “Radioactive Waste 122 — Halliburton and the U.S. Defense Department Were Fracking Nuclear Waste in the 1960s.” Nucleotidings, March 17, 2015.

FAIR USE NOTICE

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. As a journalist, I am making such material available in my efforts to advance understanding of artistic, cultural, historic, religious and political issues. I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Copyrighted material can be removed on the request of the owner.