Part 3 : Under an Ionized Sky.. Sky Anomalies

Under an Ionized Sky.

by Elana Freeman

Chapter 4 

Sky Anomalies 

A system for facilitating cloud formation and cloud precipitation includes a controller and a beam emitter that is responsive to the controller. The beam emitter is configured to emit a beam to form charged particles within an atmospheric zone containing water vapor. The charged particles enhance the formation of cloud condensation nuclei such that water vapor condenses on the cloud condensation nuclei forming cloud droplets. The system further includes a sensor configured to detect a cloud status and output a signal corresponding to the cloud status to the controller. 

— “System for facilitating cloud formation 

and cloud precipitation,” US 9526216 B2, 

Kenneth G. Caldeira, December 27, 2016 

At last count, there were sixteen different mixtures of chemicals for aerosol distribution—twelve electrically different from each other and four being time tags logging how the mixtures are working at all layers in the vertical wall of connectivity between them. Ultimately, the military plans twenty-four layers extending from Earth into the higher frequencies of space. Thus the electromagnetic Space Fence, with its cloak of invisibility dependent upon terahertz (THz) wavelengths so small they can manipulate individual atoms, is to be contiguous with the witches’ brew in our atmosphere. 

Not surprisingly, the number of “new clouds” being generated by geoengineering is the same as the number of chemical mixtures—a baker’s dozen decided by the Cloud Appreciation Society for the World Meteorological Organisation to include in its revised International Cloud Atlas first published in 1896. Joining Nature’s clouds—cirrus (L., feathers), cumulus (L., heaped up), stratus (L., layered and smooth), and nimbus (L., rain-bearing cloud)—are asperitas (L., roughness), cauda (L., tail), fluctus (Kelvin Helmholz), murus (L., wall), flumen (“beaver’s tail,” associated with a supercell severe convective storm), and the species volutus (L., rolled). 

The inclusion of rainbows, halos (sun dogs), snow devils and hailstones is odd—“All types of optical effects can be defined as clouds,” says BBC meteorologist John Hammond, who is looking forward to “many new entries in the future” 1—but no odder than lumping anthropogenic plasma cloud production via chemicals and radio frequency and microwaves in with Nature’s clouds. As the World Meteorological Organization puts it, “19th century tradition, 21st century technology”:

The International Cloud Atlas also proposes five new “special clouds”: cataractagenitus, flammagenitus, homogenitus, silvagenitus and homomutatus. The suffix genitus indicates localized factors that led to cloud formation or growth, while mutates is added when these caused the cloud to change from a different form. These special clouds are influenced by large waterfalls, localized heat from wildfires, saturation of air above forests and humans. Thus, a common example of homogenitus is contrails sometimes seen after aircraft. 2 

As I indicated in Chapter 1, even with a telephoto lens, it is difficult to discern just where on the jet the chemical spray is issuing from. As for contrails, water-injection engines are extremely rare, so if you see a short trail behind a large jet, you may be seeing the new short non-persistent chemical trails. One or two streams out of each wing making as many as four trails; one or two trails directly behind the engine; sometimes no trail at all. Excess fuel is often released from pylon drain tubes before landing, but what if it occurs at 26,000 feet? Does that make it an intentional chemical dump? At what point are we seeing supplementary chemicals not “cooked” (pyrolyzed) in the engine chambers, such as the Airbus A320 passenger jets with pipes or ducts in the pylon just above the engine? And when we see the “on-off” staccato trail, is one chemical configuration being switched for another? And the photographs of onboard modular aerial spray systems in the aircraft fuselage—is the equipment “dual use”? 

Massive experimentation is going on in our skies. The old chemical trails of the past two decades are being changed. The barium in the old trails was invisible from one direction and foggy white to grey from another. Some observers now report blue chemtrails, not the classic milky white or grey—blue meaning transparent or translucent. Even nano-sized Mylar polymers are now translucent in terahertz. Could this be due to Aerochem Corporation’s new manganese ion fuel additive? 

The absence of the typical whitish coloring is due to a kaleidoscopic refraction of depolarized barium particles exposed to a significant temperature swing (from 400–500°F, which is -55° to stratosphere output). Reversing the hygroscopic effect (a substance’s ability to attract and hold water molecules) does away with visible condensation. 3 

“INVISIBLE” 

What if chemical trails go completely invisible and future generations believe that perpetually milky baby-blue skies in the day and no stars at night is natural? 

The military has thought long and hard about not just mitigating the heat-producing “contrails” their C4 agendas require but about making aircraft invisible to sight and radar. (See General Electric’s 1964 patent US3127608 A “Object camouflage method and apparatus.”) In the 1980s, stealth programs concentrated on electromagnetics for building radar-evading bombers. For example, the McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom fighter bombers were designed so that pilots could activate cryogenic superconducting magnets to create an EM “bubble” around the aircraft. Light striking the EM field would divide and pass around the aircraft and reunite on the other side—thus, invisibility. But the pilot’s inability to see beyond the invisibility field (“a cloud of ionization” 4 ) forced the military to keep looking for more perfect visual camouflage and radar-masking. Is it possible to cloak without layer masking? Apparently so. At certain frequencies, light waves scattered by resonant and non-resonant mechanisms go into opposite phases and cancel each other out, thus producing invisibility. 5 

Nanoparticles are the name of the invisibility game, whether it’s transparent optical displays on cockpit windows or “obscurants” hiding warfighters from plain sight. Both applications have to do with engineering the size, shape, and composition of nanoparticles in accordance with the attenuation properties of light.

Recent design upgrades can now hide a warfighter from infrared and other sophisticated types of viewing, thanks to a range of metallic nanoparticles [with optical properties arising from localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) 6 ] including gold and silver that enhance the attenuation of light in a given region of the electromagnetic spectrum. . .Particles are used to absorb or scatter light in order to block a warfighter’s visibility over several bands of light. 7 

The latest is the dielectric metasurface cloak, a super-thin (3 mm) Teflon substrate with tiny embedded ceramic cylinders that manipulate EM waves. 8 This ultra-thin metamaterial 9 can work at 1/10 of missile guidance and marine radar wavelengths, and can be used for EM waves as small as those of visible light (400–700nm). Radio waves can’t detect an aircraft if radio waves don’t bounce back to a receiver, and seeing needs light to bounce off the object. Thus, if you can manipulate the waves, you can obtain invisibility. However, a 6° angle of sunlight can compromise the cloak, and the cloak can’t cover for visual and radar at the same time (due to the narrow range of wavelengths). 

So you may see a chemical trail laying itself, the jet or drone disappearing before your eyes, even if you’re looking through IR night vision goggles. The effort to make contrails invisible “to a size below a humanly visible range” has been going on for decades, the problem being the chemicals needed to depress the freezing point of water. Toxic additives mixed with the chemical trails to make them dissipate quickly so they are invisible are even worse for those who must breathe them in. Even Rolls-Royce’s ultrasonic wave method depends upon chemicals (“hydroscopic materials”) like chlorosulfonic acid and sulfur trioxide:

US 20100043443 A1, “Method and apparatus for suppressing aeroengine contrails,” February 25, 2010, Rolls-Royce. 

Claim: An aircraft comprising a gas turbine engine that exhausts a plume of gases in use, the aircraft is characterized by comprising an ultrasound generator having an ultrasonic actuator and a waveguide to direct ultrasonic waves at the exhaust plume to significantly reduce the formation of contrails. 

Other patents over the years: 

• US3517505 A, “Method and apparatus for suppressing contrails,” June 30, 1970, U.S. Air Force. 

• US4766725 A, “Method of suppressing formation of contrails and solution therefor,” August 30, 1988, Scipar, Inc., Williamsburg, New York. 

• US5005355 A, “Method of suppressing formation of contrails and solution there for,” April 9, 1991, Scipar, Inc., Williamsburg, New York. 

CHEM DUMPS AND “BOMBS” 

In Clouds of Secrecy: The Army’s Germ Warfare Tests Over Populated Areas (Rowland & Littlefield, 1988), Leonard A. Cole discusses the first Operation LAC (Large Area Coverage) in 1957–1958 when zinc cadmium sulfide nanoparticles were sprayed from the Rocky Mountains to the Atlantic Ocean and Canada to the Gulf of Mexico, cutting a swath through the San Francisco Bay area to South Dakota, Minneapolis, Corpus Christi, and back. 

Harold Saive (chemtrailsplanet.net) has created his own acronym for what he’s seeing over southeast Florida: 

A TERRA satellite view from the early afternoon of January 28th, 2017 about 1 PM reveals an unmistakable north-south aerosol operation over South Florida that drifted with the cirrus level flow out into the Atlantic as the day progressed. These are not chemtrails. They are large volume aerosol plumes or LVAP. This technique is increasingly used to dump aerosols in much larger volumes than chemtrails alone could provide. A ground observer in Southeast Florida posted a video that captured the event early in the morning. This is evidence the LVAP dumps were deployed under cover of darkness before sunrise . . . 10 

Like endless war outside of Congressional jurisdiction, we are now subject to an endless Operation LAC or LVAP. After the COP21 Paris climate conference at the end of 2015 and since the “green light” for geoengineering at the beginning of 2017, 11 nanos producing endless chemical cloud cover have been barraging the skies—and this is after two decades of commercial and military jet trails diffusing into chemical cirrus contrailus. Fleets of Boeing 747 supertankers carpet the skies not in long discrete chemical trails but from massive dumps in one pass. From satellite, the dump pattern looks like hundreds of fountain or waterfall cascades. Less and less are we seeing the crosses, tic-tac-toes, and linear fade- outs. 12 In a morning or night, large geographical areas are inundated with nary a trail—like the continental-scale carbonaceous aerosol plumes over Southeast Asia described by geophysicist Keith Potts in his 2008 paper “Aerosol Plumes: The Cause of Droughts and El Nino Events By Regional Dimming.” 13 

Two Evergreen Air patents make “superdumps” not only feasible but probable: Evergreen International Aviation Patent US7413145 B2 (2008) “Aerial Delivery System,” and Evergreen International Aviation Patent US20100314496 A1 (2010) “Enhanced Aerial Delivery System.” The patents reference “powders” for cloud seeding and forest fire retardants (U.S. Navy patent US3899144 A “Powder contrail generation,” 1975), but it is not difficult to imagine supertankers like the new Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 in service to the “dual use” credo. 14 

Besides Evergreen supertankers, new C-130Js will be replacing the 910th Airlift Wing’s current fleet of C-130H aircraft at Ohio’s Youngstown Air Reserve Station (YARS) “to ensure that the 910th’s DoD specialized aerial spray mission continues safely and without interruption.” 15 Are those C-130J’s delivering chemical dumps? 

Then there are reports of “chembombs.” Saive wonders if they are adding to, or gradually replacing, the chemical trails, which would fit with mitigating “contrails” as “unintended geoengineering”; stop spraying through the nozzles and let the less visible fuel pollution continue the aerosol flooding. Some chembombs seem to be producing individual plasma clouds all on their own, while others may be plasma experiments in now ion-rich skies. Bruce Douglas of Maui Skywatch inserted the term into the chemtrail movement when he spoke at the unforgettable Consciousness Beyond Chemtrails conference in Los Angeles in 2012. 16 Chembombs are yet another way to insert chemicals into our geoengineered skies. 

The recent U.S. Air Force announcement of four-inch CubeSats that “bomb the sky” by carrying “massive amounts of ionized gas to the ionosphere to create radio-reflecting plasma” explains how by heating vaporizing metal beyond its boiling point (shades of 9/11), metals react with atmospheric oxygen to produce radio-reflecting plasma: 

Another project from a team at Enig Associates and the University of Maryland plans to heat metal [nanoparticles?] by detonating a small [chemical?] bomb and converting the blast into electrical energy. And the shapes of the plasma clouds could be fine-tuned by altering the form of the initial explosion, New Scientist explains. 

In the past, researchers with the High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program in Alaska have attempted to create plasma using radiation from ground-based antennas to stimulate the ionosphere. The new plan from the USAF aims to find a more efficient way. 17 

Is radio frequency being used to vaporize metal nanoparticles in the lower atmosphere to produce better communications for C4 objectives? 

The ENIG space plasma generator for low Earth orbit insertion has flux compression generators that convert explosive chemical energy into electromagnetic energy: 

“We’re going to take mega-amps of energy and then joule-heat a light metal load through multi-phase transitions to generate artificial man-made plasma cloud in the ionosphere,” said ENIG President, Eric N. Enig. . .“[T]he space plasma generator can be used to smooth out ionosphere disturbance to assure reliable communications and navigation in-theater, or to provide novel capabilities for RF systems.” 18 

Given that our lower atmosphere is now basically a mini-ionosphere, we will be seeing not just plasma clouds masquerading as “natural” but other plasma events, as well. 

SHADOWS 

Shadows that either follow or precede jets laying chemical trails are not necessarily carbon black trails. They may be optical effects taking place in an ionized “cloud chamber” of the upper troposphere loaded with conductive and reflective metal nanoparticles. Also, take the angle of the Sun into account as sunlight albedo can reflect skyward and cast a trail shadow on the chem-haze above it. If the Sun is behind the observer, then the shadow may appear ahead of the aircraft. Thus when sunlight reflects from the Earth (albedo), it can project a reverse shadow on the chem-haze “screen” above, whether of a cloud or a trail. (Clouds also cast shadows into the sky when sunlight bounces from the Earth skyward.) Not only barium turns the sky into a projector screen; the albedo effect does, too. 

SUNDOGS 

Once upon a time, a sundog was a bright, rainbow-colored patch of light on either side of the Sun when it was low on the horizon. Now, a “sundog” seen through the haze of chemical trails may actually be a supercontinuum white light produced by laser pulses busy propagating plasma channels (filamentation) and remote sensing fluorescent chemical and biological signatures of dissolved metallic ions. 19 Patent US 20080180655 A1, “Remote Laser Assisted Biological Aerosol Standoff Detection in Atmosphere,” describes how a femtosecond laser or LiDAR system (light detection and ranging, combination of “light” and “radar”) can directly produce a white light supercontinuum from the ultraviolet (UV) to the visible (VIS), near infra-red (NIR) and middle infra-red (MIR) in a particle cloud for a full spectrum rainbow effect. 

The heart of the new device is a sheet only nanometers thick made of a semiconducting alloy of zinc, cadmium, sulfur, and selenium. The sheet is divided into different segments. When excited with a pulse of light, the segments rich in cadmium and selenium gave off red light; those rich in cadmium and sulfur emitted green light; and those rich in zinc and sulfur glowed blue. 

HOLE-PUNCH CLOUDS (FALLSTREAK HOLE) 

I did not find the once-rare hole-punch cloud (fallstreak hole) among the new clouds in the revised International Cloud Atlas. Hole-punch clouds point to an atmospheric release of electrical charge potential, subtle perturbations following from how the technology serving geoengineering multiplies and releases ions into the lower atmosphere to increase power density for military operations. Control over the electromagnetic potential of the Earth’s atmospheric layers is key to fulfilling the doctrine of full spectrum dominance. Phased-array Doppler radar facilities (ground-, air-, and satellite-based) can focus the microwave energy needed for this cascade of atmospheric ions. 

A DOUBLE SUN 

In 2010, two Suns appeared in the sky over New York City, and in 2011 ABC News commented on two Suns videoed over China. Interviewed astronomers who said it was just lens reflection, an evening curvature of light through pollution, an ice particle mirage, a rare optical refraction due to a “blob” or “thick patch” of atmosphere wandering in front of the Sun. 20 In the same time period, two bodies of light were also seen over Bangkok, Dubai, and Russia, one body of light always smaller than the Sun. A double sunrise in 2013, more dynamic duos in 2014, 2015, and 2016. What’s going on, other than Internet declamations of Niburu and Planet X? Is the second Sun China’s artificial star created in 2016? 21 

Or has a mirroring body been quietly ensconced in space? In 1993, the Russians claimed to be testing Znamya or Banner, a sixty-five-foot-diameter mirror coated with aluminum plastic film to reflect sunlight down to Earth from their Mir space station. 22 In 2007, The Guardian brought up giant space mirrors: 

The US government wants the world’s scientists to develop technology to block sunlight as a last-ditch way to halt global warming, the Guardian has learned. It says research into techniques such as giant mirrors in space or reflective dust pumped into the atmosphere would be “important insurance” against rising emissions . . . 23 

We know about “reflective dust pumped into the atmosphere,” thanks to chemical trails, but what about mirrors? Is the James Webb Space Telescope—twenty-one hexagonal mirror segments made of beryllium, each mirror coated with 0.12 ounces of gold in layers 120 nm thick—a giant mirror become “the world’s most powerful space observatory” 24—or DARPA’s Space Surveillance Telescope (SST) at White Sands Missile Range sweeping up its terabyte of data per night? 

The Sun is not a nuclear furnace filled with gamma rays but a positively charged plasma in a negatively charged environment. Plasma mirroring in the lower atmosphere appears to lie behind the illusion of two Suns. 

PLASMA ORBS 

In 2004, independent scientist Clifford Carnicom observed and called attention to lighted spheres or orbs in the New Mexico sky: 

The physics of motion of the [“ball of light”] defy common explanation. There is no obvious propulsion system visible, and the movement of the object is generally non-linear. . .In the original video or higher resolution formats of the video, an interaction of the object with the surrounding atmospheric medium can be seen. This interaction occurs in periodic pulses, always on the same side of the object. . .It would appear that this interaction is of a plasma nature. There also appears to be a pulsation within the light source itself . . . 25 

From time to time, observers see plasma orbs guiding or accompanying jets laying chemtrails, 26 “shooting” 27 or ejecting plasma to form horseshoe-shaped clouds. 28 It is possible that lasers are used to create those orbs, given that they can be used to create “artificial stars” and . 

. .beacons to guide the process of atmospheric compensation. When astronomers use the method, they aim a small laser at a point in the sky close to a target star or galaxy, and the concentrated light excites molecules of air (or, at higher altitudes, sodium atoms in the upper atmosphere) to glow brightly. Distortions in the image of the artificial star as it returns to Earth are measured continuously and used to deform the telescope’s flexible mirror and rapidly correct for atmospheric turbulence. That sharpens images of both the artificial star and the astronomical target. 29 

101s

Glow-mode (gas) plasma orbs can be mistaken for natural ball lightning, but they are actually produced by interfering two scalar beams over the target area. (See Chapter 11 for how they are used for battlespace targeting.) 

. . .the energy for the plasma balls is coming from the vacuum of spacetime at the very location of the balls themselves, triggered by scalar interferometers aimed through the woodpecker grid. These kinds of balls can be used as marker beacons giving feedback for precision aiming of the howitzers [ionospheric heaters]. The energy of the marker beacon can be read back into the computers, giving precise location information for pinpoint aiming. The target area can be very small or widened out. 30 

Gas plasma orbs may serve as “guidance systems” during crop circle formation. While living in England circa 2005, I visited a couple of famous crop circles in the English countryside frequented by people in meditative yoga poses. I had read about the tests that revealed radioisotopes in the flattened grass and wondered if satellite computer algorithms were behind the circles. 

In the Middle Ages, crop circles were obviously not attributed to algorithms but to “mowing devils.” By the 1800s, it was cyclonic wind. Post-World War II aerial surveys detected buried remnants of circular buildings possibly built over naturally occurring plasma discharge vortices like big “fairy rings” produced by the Earth’s electromagnetic toroidal forces. 

Beginning in the 1970s, crop circles became increasingly complex and technical, much more sophisticated than slates-and-rope hoaxes might account for. But how was it being done? Much like the Apollo Moon landings, it was difficult to believe that agencies like NASA would perpetrate “high-tech hoaxes”; thus people turned to paranormal explanations. But like the creation of “sprites” thought to be natural lightning minus thunder, the answer is probably technology. Plasma can be generated and naturally occurring vortices can be directed with the precise overhead positioning of a geostationary satellite, mathematically intricate computer-generated 3D digital designs, and microwave lasers (masers). 

GPS systems enable the artists to cover vast spaces with absolute precision, while microwaves can be used to flatten large numbers of stalks at great speeds, it was claimed. An analysis of evidence in the Physics World journal reported that researchers had used magnetrons—tubes which use electricity and magnetism to generate intense heat—to mimic the physical changes in flattened stalks in some circles, which are linked to radiation. 31 

Magnetrons like those found in microwave ovens could not begin to produce the radioisotopes present in crop circles, but maser technology could do it, and easily. 

Microwaves impact the nervous system and mind. In 2009, a National Aviation Reporting Center on Anomalous Phenomena (NARCAP) scientist attempted to warn pilots about possible side effects of encounters with “plasma balls”: 

According to a physical theory concerning plasma ball formation, very low-frequency waves — in case generated by a previously existing plasma ball, or by other natural causes coming from the ionosphere — if associated with high-frequency waves (such as microwaves by radar) may cause the formation of plasma vortexes in the air (Zou, 1995) whose behaviour is not possible to predict but which might constitute some danger to the conduct of any flight. It is not expected in general that very low-energy electromagnetic emission alone is able to affect the electronics aboard airplanes. What is important to consider here is that, according to the specific frequency range, it can interfere directly with brainwaves of the pilots and of passengers and often cause altered consciousness states and severe hallucinations. Of course this effect might render the conduct of any flight extremely dangerous. The physiologic effect of these waves, also in connection with pulsed magnetic fields, is now well known and demonstrated in biophysical and neurophysiologic laboratories (Persinger, 2000). 32 

“Plasma vortexes in the air” are reminiscent of the Humvee-mounted non-lethal weapon known as the pulsed energy projectile (PEP) that emits a short intense pulse of laser energy that creates a rapidly expanding ball of plasma that can deliver a pressure wave to stun, disable, or knock a target off their feet (or out of the air?). This EM radiation affects the nerve cells and causes excruciating pain—all from a mile away. The technology’s early name was pulsed impulsive kill laser. 

A seminal 2007 essay by targeted individual Carolyn Williams Palit alerted Internet-targeted individuals about “gas plasma generation due to the heating of chemtrails by electromagnetics”: 

The technical names for vertical and horizontal plasma columns are columnar focal lenses and horizontal drift plasma antennas. Various sizes of gas plasma orbs are associated with this technology. These orbs can be used as transmitters and receivers because they have great, refractory and optical properties. They also are capable of transmitting digital or analog sound. Barium, in fact, is very refractive — more refractive than glass. 

What does that mean? Someone or someones are very involved in unconstitutional, domestic spying and the entrained plasma orbs carried on electromagnetic beams can be used for mind control programming. The satellites can be programmed to track and monitor various frequencies on different parts of your body. These electromagnetic beams carrying the gas plasma orbs stick due to magnetic polarity and frequency mapping and tracking to people’s eyes, ears, temples, and private parts. A beam with entrained orbs carries pictures in each orb just like the different frames in a movie. It is a particle beam that is also a frequency weapon. 33 

SIGHTINGS 

From strange cloud formations to orbs behaving intelligently, the sky theater is now pregnant with puzzling spectacles. From Belo Horizonte, Brazil, we hear of three small round clouds that appeared in a matter of seconds in a blue sky with two swirling clockwise as the other became a rising “cigarette puff,” then took off, followed by the other two like “smoke cylinders.” 34 These “clouds” sound more like vectored crafts in a plasma disguise. 

It is difficult to fathom just what we are seeing in our increasingly simulated world. Sky observers point to exotic triangular crafts hiding in the plasma cloud cover, sometimes even creating their own plasma cloud cover. (Shades of operation #7: the detection and obscuration of exotic propulsion technology.) The TR-3B (Astra), the highly classified Aurora (SR-91), and the boomerang Northrop Grumman stealth B-2 Spirit bomber sighted since 1998 flying silent and low (500–1,200 feet) are just three possible crafts with classified hover capability. At his “Starburst Forum: Electrogravitics and Field Propulsion,” P. LaViolette talks about the B-2’s “silent field propulsion mode” witnessed over Boston: 

. . .the B-2 in flight scoops air into its engine cowlings and this air is there seeded with ions to create a multi-million volt potential which the B-2 used to power its electrokinetic ion drive. The fields induce asymmetrical electrostatic forces on the B-2 which propel it forward silently. This is an overunity drive: unbalanced forces create thrust which scoops air, which creates volt potentials. 35 

A 2012 Maryland sighting confirmed a “bright violet glow around the fighter that the B-2 charges its wing leading edge with to a multimillion volt potential.” 36 

And is our plasma cloud cover cloaking an order of exotic propulsion craft beyond our own? And what of the orbs that move non-linearly and pulsate like organisms? 37 

What is that triangular shape hiding in the cloud? 

see pdf link below P 103

https://avalonlibrary.net/ebooks/Elana%20Freeland%20-%20Under%20an%20Ionized%20Sky%20-%20From%20Chemtrails%20to%20Space%20Fence%20Lockdown.pdf

Something triangular moving at a fast clip and leaving a plasma trail? 

The arching wing 

SEE LINK above

. . . Plasma implosion? 

All four photos are by Sean Gautreaux, author of What Is In Our Skies Vol. 1 Diagrams: The Study of Cloaked Cloud Craft Above New Orleans, 2014. 

Physicist David Bohm experimented with electrons in plasma and observed how like a biological organism plasma behaved. In fact, the term plasma was coined for its resemblance to living blood cells. Because of this resemblance (including helical structures resembling DNA), “complex, self-organized plasma structures exhibit all the necessary properties to qualify them as candidates for inorganic living matter. They are autonomous, they reproduce, and they evolve.” 38 

Yes, inorganic living matter, not carbon-based living matter, and it seems conscious, and communicates telepathically. 

If plasma life forms were present in the Earth’s highly ionized atmosphere 4.6 billion years ago— heated gas, chemicals, electric storms—could plasma-based life forms from space be drawn to our now ionized atmosphere? A 2003 experiment written up in “Minimal Cell System Created in Laboratory by Self-Organization” found that the rhythmic “inhalation” of the nucleus of laboratory-created plasma spheres (orbs) mimics the breathing process of living systems and results in pulsations. 39 

These are strange, exciting, and dangerous times 

notes chapter 4

1 Matt McGrath, “‘New’ wave-like cloud finally wins recognition.” BBC, 23 March 2017. 

2 “New International Cloud Atlas: 19th century tradition, 21st century technology.” World Meteorological Organization, 22 March 2017 [World Meteorological Day]. 

3 Email, Mark Porrey, June 2, 2015. 

4 Arnold L. Eldredge, “Object camouflage method and apparatus.” General Electric Patent US3127608 A, 1964. 

5 Mikhail V. Rybin et al., “Switching from Visibility to Invisibility via Fano Resonances: Theory and Experiment.” Scientific Reports, 2015:8774. 

6 Plasmonic nanoparticles are used in tagging, tracking, and smart bar code applications. 

7 Donald Kennedy, “Tiny Nanoparticles—A Big Battlefield Impact?” Defense AT&L, September-October 2014. 

8 Kyle Jahner, “Breakthrough in cloaking technology grabs military’s attention.” Military Times, September 21, 2015. 

9 According to Harald Kautz-Vella, the ancient Greeks distinguished between form forces and matter forces. These form forces are now called metamaterials and dominate nanoparticles. 

10 Harold Saive, “Florida Climate Engineering Captured by Satellite and Ground Observer,” February 3, 2017, chemtrailsplanet.net/2017/02/03/florida-climate-engineering-captured-by-satellite-and-ground-observer/. 

11 Jamie Condliffe, “Geoengineering Gets the Green Light from Federal Scientists.” Technology Review, January 11, 2017. 

12 See Harold Saive’s YouTubes at “Chemtrails Not Enough: Climate Engineers Dumping Large Volume Aerosol,” April 13, 2016, chemtrailsplanet.net/2016/04/13/chemtrails-not-enough-climate-engineers-now-dumping-large-volume-aerosol-plumes/. 

13 See Harold Saive’s chemtrailsplanet.net/2016/01/03/scientist-el-nino-created-and-sustained-by-aerosols/. 

14 Evergreen International Airlines is a CIA carrier. It was originally based outside McMinnville, Oregon near Portland before declaring bankruptcy and shutting down its specially outfitted fleet of 747s in January 2014. By December 2014, Evergreen supertankers were flying in and out of Arizona’s Pinal Airpark of Marana Army Airfield. For the questionable history of Evergreen Air and its relationship to tanker distribution, see “How a Few 747 Supertankers Can Dump Tons of Aerosols as ‘Climate Change’,” October 11, 2014, chemtrailsplanet.net/2014/10/11/evergreen-air-fleet-of-747-super-tankers-involved-in-chemtrails-and-climate-modification/. 

15 “Senate Approves Portman, Brown Amendment Urging Air Force To Prioritize C-130 Upgrades For the Youngstown Air Reserve Station,” Rob Portman press release, June 7, 2016. 

16 “From Chemtrails to Chembombs, Aerial Aerosol Explosions are the New Dispersion Method,” September 8, 2012, www.youtube.com/watch?v=dMSRPem4n7s 

17 Cheyenne MacDonald, “The US Air Force reveals radical plan to ‘bomb the sky’ to improve radio reception.” Daily Mail, 22 August 2016. 

18 “U.S. Air Force Awards Contract to ENIG for Space Plasma Generator (…) for Artificial Modification of Ionosphere.” ENIG press release, July 8, 2015. 

19 Huailiang Xu, “Femtosecond Laser Filamentation for Atmospheric Sensing.” Sensors 11(1):32-53, December 2010. Also view “Lightning in the lab: Femtosecond laser generating plasma in air.” YouTube, Dave Sheludko, March 29, 2009: “A 100GW 35fs 1kHz laser is focused down to a narrow waist, which creates an electric field large enough to ionise the air. You can see the resulting plasma glowing (the little white floating blob). The process is essentially the same as lightning, which of course is accompanied by “thunder”: the 1kHz buzz you can hear is the thunder, repeated 1,000 times per second (the laser pulses at 1kHz). The coloured pattern on the wall is the expanded beam, the moving colours generated by the nonlinear effects in the plasma.” 

20 “China’s ‘Two Suns’ Video Unexplained By Science.” Space.com, March 7, 2011. 

21 Aditya Iyer, “China creates artificial star 8,600 times hotter than sun’s surface.” Hindustan Times, February 11, 2016. 

22 Warren E. Leary, “Russians To Test Space Mirror As Giant Night Light for Earth.” New York Times, January 12, 1993. 

23 David Adam, “US answer to global warming:smoke and giant space mirrors.” The Guardian, 26 January 2007. 

24 Clara Moskowitz, “NASA Completes Giant Mirrors for Hubble Successor Telescope.” Space.com, September 16, 2011. 

25 Clifford E. Carnicom, “Orbs Require Consideration,” March 14, 2004, carnicominstitute.org/wp/orbs-require-consideration/. 

26 “Orb leading ChemtrailJets,” May 16, 2014. Dumbbell dumbbase, www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjDA4PpiWJI. 

27 “UFO (ORB) Fires Its Gun into Chemtrail!! Twice!!” March 11, 2014. Crow777, www.youtube.com/watch? v=4byMQIk_iGQ&nohtml5=False. 

28 See 2:47–4:38 of “Chemtrails Australia Gold Coast 7th Haarp Orbs, Plasma Balls, Chemtrails,” Dave Brooke, January 6, 2014. www.youtube.com/watch?v=MLliG-W3JxA 

29 William J. Broad, “Administration Researches Laser Weapon.” New York Times, May 3, 2006. 

30 Thomas Bearden, “Are the Russians Making ‘UFOs’?” www.prahlad.org/pub/bearden/scalar_wars.htm 

31 Nick Collins, “Crop circles ‘created using GPS, lasers and microwaves’.” The Telegraph, 1 August 2011. Also see “Physics could be behind the secrets of crop-circle artists.” Physics World, 1 August 2011: “Matin Durrani, editor of Physics World, said: ‘It may seem odd for a physicist such as [Richard Taylor, director of the Material Science Institute at the University of Oregon] to be studying crop circles, but then he is merely trying to act like any good scientist—examining the evidence for the design and construction of crop circles without getting carried away by the sideshow of UFOs, hoaxes, and aliens.” 

32 Massimo Teodorani, Ph.D., “Spherical Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Scientific Observations and Physical Hypotheses, Danger Evaluation for Aviation and Future Observational Plans.” National Aviation Reporting Center on Anomalous Phenomena (NARCAP) Research Associate, October 2009. www.narcap.org/Projsphere/narcap_ProjSph_2.4_MaxTeo.pdf 

33 Carolyn Williams Palit, “What Chemtrails Really Are.” Rense.com, November 9, 2007. 

34 Ronald Swait, July 8, 2016, Facebook. 

35 P. LaViolette, “B-2 Sighting confirms field propulsion theory.” Starburstfound.org, April 18, 2011. Also see a Sirius Disclosure interview with LaViolette, “The Underdogs of New Energy,” December 27, 2013. 

36 P. LaViolette, “Confirmation that the B-2 charges to high voltage its wing leading edge.” Starburstfound.org, April 20, 2011. 

37 Clifford E. Carnicom, “Orbs Require Consideration.” Carnicominstitute.org, March 14, 2004. 

38 V.N. Tsytovich, “From Plasma Crystals and Helical Structures Towards Inorganic Living Matter.” New Journal of Physics, August 2007. 

39 Erzilia Lozneanu and Mircea Sanduloviciu, “Minimal Cell System Created in Laboratory by Self-Organization”; published in Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, an interdisciplinary journal of Nonlinear Science, and Nonequilibrium and Complex Phenomena, Vol. 18, Issue 2, October 2003. Thanks to Jay Alfred (“Plasma Life Forms — Spheres, Blobs, Orbs and Subtle Bodies,” ezinearticles.com, October 15, 2007) for a most stimulating discussion of plasma.