Under an Ionized Sky.
by Elana Freeman
2
Aether, Plasma and Scalar Waves
We shall say “Our space has the physical property of transmitting waves” and so omit the use of the
word [æther] we have decided to avoid.
— Albert Einstein, Evolution of Physics, 1938
One cannot escape the feeling that [James Clerk Maxwell’s] mathematical formulas have an
independent existence and an intelligence of their own, that they are wiser than we are, wiser even
than their discoverers in that we get more out of them than was originally put into them.
— Heinrich Hertz (1857–1893)
There are five elements, four of which are held in the matrix of the fifth which is unaffected by them, of
ETHER.
— Michael Gabriel, The Holy Valley
and the Holy Mountain, 1994
Imagine the Sun’s magnetic field divided from pole to pole like sections of an orange, each section
oriented to its opposite section, so that when the Sun rotates, the Earth’s fields change with the Sun’s
changing fields. Now imagine that everything is connected and speaking from a variety of levels to
whoever is listening at that particular level—an intelligent and conversational universe waiting for us to
listen and familiarize ourselves with its cipher language.
The universe may indeed be Hilbert’s Space of infinite dimensions. Quantum mechanics implies an
infinity of different shapes and topologies that fit together as waves, each interfering with another.
Intercept the charges around the terminals of generators or batteries and you may discover endless,
hidden-in-plain-sight free energy.
Æther was the upper air; the middle air was aer or khaos, a colorless mist enveloping the mortal world; the lower air, erebos, enveloped the
dark places in the realm of the dead under the Earth. Æther’s female counterpart was Æthra, Titaness of the clear blue sky and mother of the
Sun and Moon.
Here in the Pergamon Altar (second century B.C.) in Berlin, Æther battles a lion-headed Giant. (Ahriman a.k.a. geoengineering?)
The term we have needed for the untapped “free energy” potentials of pure æther energy is scalar, not
electromagnetic. Æther and scalar energy have shared many epithets: prana, chi or qi, zero-point energy,
tachyon energy, biophotonic energy, Rife energy, orgone, kundalini, life force, etc. Both æther (from the
Greek αἰθήϱ, to light up or kindle) and scalar waves (scalar: a quantity with magnitude but not direction)
have been suppressed for a century. Why? Basically, it is the same old story: the elite bend and suppress
inventors and scientific genius so as to control revelations of scientific truths and inventions according to
their own timetable.
Nikola Tesla’s experiments revolved around scalar waves, not EM waves, as he sought to transform
electrons into vortex electrons. Faster-than-light—yes, that is right: faster than light—scalar waves are
actually spiraling waves (as in wind rotation) continually branching out into recurring fractal patterns.
Scalar waves “coagulate” as particles of matter (plasma) when they slow down to slower-than-light
(subluminal) speeds. Once they converge with EM waves, alter the structure of EM energy. Unlike the
usual side-to-side oscillating transverse waves (like on the ocean) we see in RF-zapped plasma cloud
cover, scalar waves are longitudinal and more like compression waves.
Ionospheric heaters like HAARP are scalar transmitters. Cross or “interfere” two scalar beams in the
stratosphere over a target area and the resultant superheating will produce a plasma “ring” over the
interference zone. Pump (pulse) this “ring” with radar and storm intensification will follow, as Michael
Janitch (Dutchsinse) explains.
1 One scalar beam strips the electrons to form superheated plasma, the other
beam pumps up and sustains the plasma.
Konstantin Meyl, Ph.D.,
2 professor of power electronics and alternative energy technology at the
University of Applied Sciences in Furtwangen, Germany, clarifies the existence of two kinds of scalar
waves and the usual electromagnetic wave:
Electric scalar wave [longitudinal / standing] propagates at 1.5X the speed of light in the direction of
the electric pointer (90°)
3
;
Magnetic scalar wave [longitudinal / standing] propagates at 1.5X the speed of light in the direction
of the magnetic pointer (90°); and
Electromagnetic wave [transverse] propagates in the direction of both (zero).
Western physics posits four forces of the universe that address matter: gravitational, electromagnetic,
weak and strong nuclear. What has been left out since the beginning of the twentieth century is æther, the
sub-quantum field that appears as empty space but is actually the ground state of the universe.
4 Like
“junk” DNA—now proven to not be “junk” at all
5—the “quantum vacuum” isn’t a void but a highly
charged plenum whose subtle order measurably influences the spacetime motion of the entire physical
universe. Like their predecessors, nineteenth-century scientists recognized that all-pervasive space was
filled to overflowing with soniferous æther, the soul of the cosmos by which divine thought manifests in
matter and therefore the common origin of all matter, as Michael Faraday (1791–1867) believed. Less
than a century before Faraday, the polymath Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646–1716) claimed, “There is
no vacuum. . .space without matter is something imaginary.”
Æther was also viewed as extending to the subtle bodies of light that all biological creatures have
(including planet Earth)—bodies vulnerable to ionized and non-ionized electromagnetic radiation.
Austrian scientist Rudolf Steiner delineated four ethers (note the difference in spelling for subtle bodies)
binding the physical to the psychic (ψνχή Greek for “soul” or “spirit”):
The warmth ether, the most primordial, manifests centrifugally as heat and appears as SPHERICAL.
The light ether, centrifugal, manifests as gas. Its primary quality is LUMINOSITY.
The chemical/sound ether, centripetal, manifests as fluid and is DISC-FORMING.
The life ether, centripetal, immediately precedes matter and is INDIVIDUALIZING.
6
If we think of these four types of ether in terms of plasma, the fourth state of matter making up most of
the matter in the universe, it seems evident that plasma and æther are one and the same but in different
phases or forms of spherical, luminous, disc-forming, and individual. The fourth state of matter means just
that: heat a solid sufficiently and it becomes liquid; heat a liquid and it becomes a gas; heat a gas (or
subject it to a strong electromagnetic field) and it ionizes to become something no longer like ordinary gas
in that it is strongly influenced by electric and magnetic fields. This is plasma, and the physics of plasma
is about electrons and ions, conduction, high-voltage discharges, the mirroring ionosphere, the “dancing
plasma” of the aurora borealis, our Sun, other stars . . .
7
Now, plasma is being “farmed” in lower ionized atmospheres.
On Earth, a healthy biological / emotional / mental life requires a balance of all four ethers supported
by vital food, air, water, and consciousness, all of which are now under assault by a blizzard of radio
frequency and microwaves, ionized metals, polymers, upper-atmosphere fungi, and genetically engineered
biologicals.
From the sixteenth to the early twentieth century, gravitational phenomena were modeled on the æther
medium. Einstein retained the term until 1920:
We may say that according to the general theory of relativity space is endowed with physical qualities; in this sense, therefore,
there exists an æther. According to the general theory of relativity, space without æther is unthinkable; for in such space there not
only would be no propagation of light, but also no possibility of existence for standards of space and time (measuring-rods and
clocks), nor therefore any space-time intervals in the physical sense. But this æther may not be thought of as endowed with the
quality characteristic of ponderable media, as consisting of parts which may be tracked through time. The idea of motion may not
be applied to it.
8
Somewhere between Darwinian evolutionary dogma, good-old-boy peer reviews, and powerful sub
rosa occult societies, a decision was made to eliminate æther from mainstream science and replace it
with space as a vacuum while scalar waves and the rest of Tesla’s work and that of Maxwell and E.T.
Whittaker (1873–1956)
9 were suppressed.
What happened was this: In 1873, James Clerk Maxwell (1831–1879) linked electricity to magnetism
and discovered three components in electromagnetic waves he called EM mass-entities (nonphysical
hyperspace particles), now called evoked potentials—very fine scalar waveforms existing at right-angle
rotations to electromagnetic fields. Hyperspace flux energy potentials flow unharnessed like waves in a
cosmic sea of intense power in dimensions adjacent to ours, which is why they are not subject to our
spacetime unless disturbed by our planetary magnetic lines of force—the same magnetic lines of force so
pivotal (no pun intended) to leaching ions from the ionosphere. Thus it is that electromagnetic effects can
be initiated from outside our electromagnetic spectrum. The fact is that a variety of fields and
waveforms exist at right-angle (orthogonal) rotations in hyperspace outside our electromagnetic fields.
Generate and manipulate these orthogonal components and they can invisibly generate electromagnetic
effects to influence the Earth, human biology and consciousness.
Maxwell died at forty-eight of stomach cancer, after which two assaults were initiated: his field
equations were edited to misrepresent scalar waves as zero (like EM waves), and æther was “disproven”
by the dubious 1881 Michelson-Morley experiments. Mathematician Oliver Heaviside (1850–1925),
chemist Josiah Willard Gibbs (1839–1903), and physicist Heinrich Hertz (1857–1894)
10
then buried
æther, along with Maxwell’s hyperspatial Quaternions (tensors) and scalar equations—the very
foundations of electromagnetics and unified field theory—and replaced them with vector analysis and the
insistence that gravitation and electromagnetism are mutually exclusive instead of interdependent. Instead
of five dimensions—X, Y, Z, time, and gravity—mainstream twentieth-century physics was subsequently
confined to four dimensions, with hyperspace superluminal signals viewed as “imaginary components.” In
the 1920s, English theoretical physicist Paul Dirac (1902–1984), one of the founders of quantum
mechanics and quantum electrodynamics, insisted that science would have to return to the ether theory, but
of course no one listened, scientism being entrenched.
About the time relativity was being pushed as a truism, studies of radioactivity began showing that the
empty vacuum of space had a spectroscopic structure similar to that of ordinary quantum solids and fluids.
Subsequent studies with large particle accelerators clarified that space is more like a piece of window
glass than Newtonian emptiness, filled with “stuff” that is normally transparent. Once it became obvious
that Leibniz had been right about space, the term dark matter was proposed to explain away why galaxies
contain so much more mass than can be accounted for by visible matter.
11 Physics Nobel Laureate Robert
B. Laughlin (1950-) thought that the æther cover-up for the sake of bolstering special relativity was
“unfortunate” enough, but then to import a term like “dark matter” for æther?
It is ironic that Einstein’s most creative work, the general theory of relativity, should boil down to conceptualizing space as a
medium when his original premise [in special relativity] was that no such medium existed. . .The word ‘ether’ has extremely
negative connotations in theoretical physics because of its past association with opposition to relativity. This is unfortunate because,
stripped of these connotations, it rather nicely captures the way most physicists actually think about the vacuum. . .Relativity
actually says nothing about the existence or nonexistence of matter pervading the universe, only that any such matter must have
relativistic symmetry . . .
12
Only now that the atmosphere is ionized and the Space Fence infrastructure complete are Maxwell’s
equations being returned to their original form. The makings of life itself—æther, plasma, and scalar
waves—are being weaponized. Maxwell’s evoked potentials are being artificially manufactured and
weaponized in three modes: pulse, energy extraction, and explosion. To proponents of classical
electrodynamics, conductivity happens via metal wires, whereas in Maxwell physics, conductivity occurs
in dielectric æther-filled hyperspace when conductors serve as waveguides for crossed scalar beams
(interferometry) that suck the energy out of airspace and cause a cold explosion, or just as easily direct an
invisible hot beam to instantaneously drop a target. Cold explosion preserves machines and buildings but
not life forms; hot energy forces buildings, machines and bodies to explode / implode and “melt” as the
nucleus of each atom disintegrates. (Shades of 9/11.)
These weapons involve beams. Two beams overlapped will couple into a particle-ion beam that will bounce off of a remote target
and send a holographic image back to the satellite for remote spying operations. When you cross two strong beams, you can
supposedly* create scalar energies. These energies can be used as untraceable weapons for nuclear size explosions or for
defense. These crossed-energies can be used to cause a person’s physical electrical system to fail or with a lower frequency,
administer a kind of remote electroshock. Visualize touching a positive and negative electric cable to each other on top of your
head. Scalar energies can be utilized in hand-held military guns and on tanks. They can dud-out electronics or cause large,
electrical blackouts. Scalar energies are practically impossible to shield against. You need lead, ceramics, and a deep underground
facility to not be affected by these weapons. Or, you need to be up and above the field of battle.
13
When interfering scalar transmitters cross beams over coordinates on the other side of the Earth, they
utilize artificial evoked potentials and earth-penetrating tomography to create earthquakes at the points of
interference. Natural seismic waves don’t travel through the Earth; only man-made scalar waves do. Two
timed pulses are sent along two or three beams meeting over the target area, heated energy is extracted
from the airspace, a cold explosion occurs, and the beams swing back to their originating transmitters
with none the wiser.
Transmitters, receivers, and transceivers under the scalar HAARP system are now tuned to the scalar
harmonic and transmitting at 90° angles to each other, following waveguides around and through the
planet. Because scalar weapons produce gravitational waves, a worldwide network of gravitational
(longitudinal) wave detectors is constantly and quietly tracking and measuring weapon capabilities—like
GEO600, a ground-based interferometric gravitational wave detector near Hannover, Germany, Virgo in
Italy, KAGRA in Japan, and the twin Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO)
detectors in Livingston, Louisiana and Hanford, Washington (operated by CalTech and MIT).
To counter public knowledge of these scalar-produced gravitational waves, cosmic cover stories are
being conjured out of the same whole cloth as “meteors,” the Big Bang and the Higgs boson “God
Particle.” For example, the 2016 story about the LIGO interferometer detecting “ripples in the fabric of
space time” (Einstein) produced by the union of two black holes 1.3 billion years ago,
14 “shocking
confirmation that the waves emanated from a cataclysmic collision 29 years ago in Pontiac, Michigan, an
irresistible force meeting an immovable object” inside a “dome-like structure.” Astrophysicist Kip
Thorne looks into the distant past and sees gravitational waves produced by a colossal mass slammed to
the ground by a powerful star, “93,173 bodies, by my calculations—before rippling outward into the
universe.”
15
Known to exist at Earth’s poles and equatorial plane, Birkeland currents were first proposed by their namesake Kristian Birkeland to be
electromagnetic conduits transferring energy between celestial objects over great distances in space, such as between the Earth and Sun. At
their core, Birkeland currents are longitudinally compressed waves of electric force, their core being the center point of concentric counterrotational magnetic sheaths of transverse Alfvén wave propagation. These transverse waves are responsible for the “plasma tubes” of
magnetic sheaths observed from pole to pole on Earth.
Alfvén waves are named for Hannes Alfvén and are filaments of oppositely charged ions pulsing in opposite directions. The force that binds
these oppositely charged ionic Alfvén waves is called the Lorentz force. Three rings or electrojets consisting of two twisted Alfvén waves
encircle the Earth at near the speed of light.
While weaponizing evoked potentials is plowing full steam ahead, physics doctoral programs are still
not offering electrogravitics courses; electromagnetic waves are all still categorized as Hertzian, despite
the fact that ELF, ULF, and biosystems waves aren’t Hertzian; and classical Newtonian physics still pooh poohs evoked potentials as imaginary. Nuclear engineer Thomas Bearden calls modern electrodynamics
“a piece of tripe.”
With an understanding of electrodynamics, Tesla weapons like the HAARP Howitzer would be seen
for what they are: hyperspace weapons. People would understand how the quantum potential in nature can
be built and steered by “using a modified Whittaker EM to implement David Bohm’s hidden variable
theory of quantum mechanics.”
16 They would learn how HAARP passes scalar waves through matter and
dislodges the target from spacetime itself—like the 1943 Philadelphia Experiment and the 2001 World
Trade Towers. They would learn that scalar waves hearken from the same realm as the antimatter that
CERN is attempting to access. HAARP Howitzers disintegrate soft tissue and destroy every living cell
until the body falls like a limp rag but does not decay, not even for forty-five days. The right frequencies
pulsed on scalar waves can be made to influence thoughts as well as physical functions like vision,
glands, and musculature.
Scalar interferometry spells the arrival of global C4 domination, given that scalar beams can be
delivered by aircraft, satellite, or vectored craft. Artificial evoked potentials shaped into plasma orbs /
Tesla globes can be directed like cannonballs against a target by two or more transmitters and can fail the
electronics in airplanes, jets, helicopters, and missiles. Normal and encrypted communications can be
tapped while evoked potentials can also be used to transmit impenetrable communications inside ordinary
carrier waves, making them perfect for two-way communication with nuclear submarines, ships, aircraft,
and satellites. By shaping a spherical interference shell (plasma shield / Tesla dome) in the searching
radar bandwidth, radar invisibility can be created.
The Laser Developed Atmospheric Lens (LDAL) turns “the Earth’s atmosphere into a lens-like
structure to magnify or change the path of electromagnetic waves such as light and radio signals”
17 by
means of high-powered lasers. The lens can also be used as a plasma shield against enemy laser. We are
living in the Star Wars matrix.
Space Fence S-band radar (2.2–2.3 GHz) in the now-conductive lower atmosphere can generate
plasma. (See Chapter 8 for much more on S-band radar.) It is not difficult to envision how Tesla’s
protective 3D plasma shield or dome might be zapped into being in a flash by linking wide scalar beams
from two or more transmitters in the airspace over even a vast geographic area like the Arctic Circle.
Multiple layers of plasma would create a “nesting” effect in which each layer’s sensors would probe for
various levels of identification. Illicit attempts to breach this force field could result in the craft or
missile becoming inoperative or blowing up while human nervous systems are in meltdown. Raytheon is
already constructing large luminous plasma shields over oceans and installations in the North and South
Poles (including over Gakona HAARP).
18
In X-ray mode, scalar waves become remote viewing radar, synthetic telepathy or voice-to-skull
(V2K) mind control. On a scalar carrier, an advanced quantum potential weapon can mimic the signature
or frequency of a disease and recreate it. Collective kills can be remotely achieved in a fifty-mile radius,
individual kills on high-intensity pulse mode. In mood mode, a phase-locked 10Hz modulation pulsed by
scalar transmitters can subject a population in a seventy-five-mile radius to a quiescent, hypnotic state
19
because the body functions not on electromagnetic waves but on scalar magnetic waves.
As invisible scalar weapons make missiles and nuclear bombs obsolete, near-invisible
nanotechnology tethers our bodies and brains to the trillions of sensors, microprocessors and genetically
engineered nanobots now being loosed in our compromised biosphere.
3
The Nano Assault
Metamaterial (Greek, meta, beyond) - engineered to have a property not found in nature
Micron (μm) - micrometer; one millionth of a meter (0.000039 inch)
Nanometer (nm) - one billionth of a meter (0.000000001 m)
Oh, and as for the smart dust concept, the whole notion was created by the Defense Department, and
UC Berkeley scientists are currently working on projects that include such applications as “battlefield
surveillance, treaty monitoring, transportation monitoring, scud hunting.” CNN headlined a story on
the technology this way: ‘Smart dust’ aims to monitor everything.
— “Cornell sounds nanoparticle health warning,”
eats shoots ‘n leaves, February 17, 2012
Our Earth is surrounded and suffused by an electric circuit. More than a century ago, Norwegian scientist
Kristian Birkeland postulated huge electric currents powered by solar wind being drawn through the
ionosphere by Earth’s magnetic field. These Birkeland currents connect the Earth to the Sun. This is a
natural fact, as lightning, volcanic eruptions of sulfur, and Alfvén waves (“whistlers”)
1 once were.
Multiply what was once natural by radio waves and microwaves now 200 million times those of a
century ago: FM radio, television, cell phones, computers, radar, etc. Next, add the stealthy “Star Wars”
Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) silently resurrected and morphed into the wireless AI-run Space Fence
infrastructure dependent upon electro-optical chemicals loaded with nanoparticles dosing our skies—all
without public debate or knowledge.
For over a half-century, “national security” technology has been quietly overturning democracy and
the public transparency it relies on.
Weather engineering is key to all other electromagnetic military operations. Not only is high-frequency
“sky beam” technology daily adjusting the temperature-dependent conductivity of the lower atmosphere
by heating portions of the ionosphere,
2 but it has been weaponized for the military doctrine of full
spectrum dominance via C4 (command, control, communications, and cyberwarfare) dependent upon (1) a
conductive lower atmosphere, and (2) space- and ground-based systems that assure 24/7 conductivity.
3
Along with conductive metal nanoparticles, trillions of nano-sensors and microprocessors have been and
continue to be released into the stratosphere and troposphere via jets, drones, ships, and rockets.[Jesus Christ, the implications of this are mind boggling dc]
In short, our atmosphere is no longer conducting natural charge, current, and voltage. Instead, we are
now breathing from a ramped-up amplifier / condenser / antenna built of conductive nano-metals and
ionized electrons. Tiny and almost weightless for maximum long-lasting loft, metal nanoparticles offer
multiplied surface area and attract moisture for generating storms. Besides attaching to and ionizing
molecules of oxygen, those in the upper atmosphere bond with and draw unknown organisms down into
our atmosphere, creating chemical synergies our immune systems know nothing about. Yet we are forced
to breathe this chemical witches’ brew while the nanoparticles (including “smart dust” and “dusty
plasma”) breach our blood-brain barrier.
Thus it is no longer only the unseen world of wireless radio waves and microwaves pulsing through
our bodies and brains that we must take into account but nano-synergies that our Earth and immune
systems are so far ill-equipped to handle.
4
The military-industrial-intelligence complex gave the green light to nanotechnology more than twenty
years ago, about the time that jets began spewing nano-metals. Nano-scale materials, tools and devices
now exceed profits of $1 trillion per year.
The nano-revolution—like the non-ionized radiation revolution—occurred very quietly so as to avoid
public attention and government safety trials and standards. Owning the weather was the overarching
military-industrial-intelligence objective, not health. Nor was it the first time that the biosphere had to
serve as collateral damage for open field “research” under Section 1520a Chapter 32 of U.S. Code Title
50, “Restrictions on use of human subjects for testing of chemical or biological agents”:
Title 50 defines the role of war and national defense, and Chapter 32 sets limits on chemical and biological warfare programs.
While the Secretary of Defense may not conduct any chemical or biological experiments on civilian populations, the loophole lies in
allowing for medical, therapeutic, pharmaceutical, agricultural, and industrial research and tests, including research for protection
against weapons and for law enforcement purposes like riot control.
5
It is not just the size and chemical signatures of nanoparticles that makes them a planetary hazard, it is
their unnatural relationship with Nature. Nanotechnology is about taking apart, reconstructing, and
condensing Nature at a molecular level measuring 1/80,000th the diameter of a human hair. Polystyrene
carboxylated nanoparticles are in food additives and vitamins (all FDA-approved, of course).
6 “Nano enabled products” span medicines, textiles, laundry detergent and fuel additives, dental fillings, food
packaging, and skin care. A campfire naturally produces carbon nanotubes, but titanium dioxide (TiO2
)
added to processed foods, toothpaste, gum, paint, paper, plastic, etc., is not “natural” but engineered,
which places corporations like Kraft, Nestle, Hershey, Campbell, and Unilever squarely in the nano-food
business. It is not just Monsanto GMOs that we need to research.
But the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) views nanos as fundamentally no different from the
silver or titanium they come from and so allows corporations to simply label nanoparticles as
“additives.” The truth is that Nature at the nanoscale has far different properties. Copper becomes
transparent, aluminum explosive, solids liquid. At the molecular level, the laws of physics and chemistry
governing color, solubility, strength, reactivity, toxicity, etc. work differently and may represent a danger
to the biosphere. More research is needed.
Both the Center for Food Safety and the Energy & Environment Legal Institute are suing the EPA for
not protecting citizens or the environment from what boils down to military-industrial-intelligence
complex agendas dependent upon the unregulated use of nanotechnology.
“Nanotechnology is a novel technology that poses unique risks unlike anything we’ve seen before,” said Jaydee Hanson, policy
director at the International Center for Technology Assessment. “Scientists agree that nanomaterials create novel risks that require
new forms of toxicity testing. EPA’s use of a conditional registration could not be more inappropriate in this context.”
7
GEMS – Global Environmental MEMS Sensors or Systems
NEMS – Nanoelectromechanical Sensors or Systems
Electron micrograph of NEMS objects fabricated in single-crystal silicon by using electron beam lithography and surface micromachining. A
torsional oscillator, a compound torsional oscillator, a series of silicon nanowires, and an oscillating silicon mesh mirror. – H.G. Craighead,
“Nanoelectromechanical Systems,” Science, Vol. 290, Issue 5496, 24 November 2000.
Neither lawsuit takes into account the electromagnetically charged nanoparticles that have been
aerially spread throughout the atmosphere for the past two decades. Whatever the “reasonable” rationale,
the truth is that we are being heavily dosed inside and out with ionized nanoparticles we have yet to learn
the effects of.
Then there’s the PM2.5 atmospheric particulate matter safety measure set in 1997 for the National
Ambient Air Quality Standard. The science behind this “safety measure,” like the science behind other
national standards, appears to have been set by the military: the EPA bribed researchers working for the
Clean Air Scientific Air Advisory Committee with $190+ million in grants.
EPA began regulating PM2.5 in the early 1990s, and today says there’s no safe level of exposure to the air pollutant. . .These small
particles can get into people’s respiratory system and can harm human health and even lead to death after just short-term exposure,
according to EPA. In 2011, former EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson told Congress that PM2.5 “causes premature death. It doesn’t
make you sick. It’s directly causal to dying sooner than you should,” she said.
8
Look up and you may see camouflaged DC-10 tankers or ghostlike low-flying drones compressing and
releasing classified chemical compounds in which swarms of smart nano-machines are self-adjusting
their size, temperature, and polarity to enhance their dispersal rate and refine their buoyancy as they seed
storm fronts and hurricanes, communicate weather patterns to supercomputers, and increase or decrease
the storm’s size and intensity as radio frequency steers them to a specified target area. The U.S. Air Force
document “Weather As A Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025” credits nanotechnology with the
total weather modification process becoming “a real-time loop of continuous, appropriate, measured
interventions, and feedback capable of producing desired weather behavior.”
9 [so there you have it, they are directing the weather dc]
Meanwhile, we breathe in these nano-machines, along with everything else.
Not only is nanotechnology’s stance toward Nature unnatural, but the nano sciences operate outside
the laws of classical physics in the uncharted realm of quantum mechanics. As theoretical physicist
Richard Feynman (1918–1988) said, “If you aren’t deeply disturbed by quantum mechanics, you clearly
haven’t understood it.” Like antimatter, nanobots may be from parallel dimensions that obey different
laws. (See Chapter 7.) For example, tiny nano-scale molecular rotors don’t interact with air and so cannot
be influenced by friction, as normal rotors in an aircraft engine are. A subtler example is how the Sun’s
photons convert semiconducting heavy metals into hot energy charge carriers from inside plasmonic
10
metal nanoparticles:
Classical models of photo-induced charge excitation and transfer in metals suggest that the majority of the energetic charge
carriers rapidly decay within the metal nanostructure before they are transferred into the neighboring molecule or semiconductor,
and therefore, the efficiency of charge transfer is low. Herein, we present experimental evidence that calls into question this
conventional picture. We demonstrate a system where the presence of a molecule, absorbed on the surface of a plasmonic
nanoparticle, significantly changes the flow of charge within the excited plasmonic system. The nanoparticle-absorbate system
experiences high rates of direct, resonant flow of charge from the nanoparticle to the molecule, bypassing the conventional charge
excitation and thermalization process taking place in the nanoparticle . . .
11
(Emphasis added.)
We really don’t know the end result of nanotechnology marching to a quantum drummer, but continuing
to ignore its complex invasive and invisible aspects everywhere inside and outside biological bodies and
brains is perilous.
Lawmakers and nano-materials physicists have been irresponsible. Feeble warnings followed the
1996 introduction of the term smart dust by UC Berkeley professor Kris Pister in reference to
nanoparticles fitted with computing power, sensing equipment, tiny wireless radios, and self-sustaining
batteries as the planetary nerve endings that would monitor everything and everyone, then report back to
corporate headquarters of Hewlett-Packard’s Central Nervous System for the Earth. The 1999 National
Science and Technology Council’s Nanotechnology Research Directions: Vision for Nanotechnology in
the Next Decade admitted: “The risks to human health for particles on this length scale have not been
assessed. In some cases, as for silica and asbestos fibers, the hazard potential is clear; in others, it
appears that the hazard potential may be lower. Nanoscale aerosol particles are constantly involved in
complex chemical processes in the atmosphere.”
12
(Emphasis added.) [we don't know, but we are doing it anyhow!!! pure idiocy dc]
Was there a congressional investigation? No.
A major hurdle for the neuroscientists, geneticists, and Pentagon visionaries committed to achieving
an “enhanced” Transhumanist humanity has been how to mount mass-scale brain-machine interfaces
(BMIs) for a “hive mind.” The answer is to disseminate neural dust composed of complementary metal
oxide semiconductor circuitry (CMOS) and sensors that lodge in the brain. But while entering the brain
from the bloodstream, nanoparticles and nanobots overstimulate brain cells, form blood clots, and punch
holes in cell membranes. [they do not have the right to be doing this, f*3K their hive mind, and their war against free will of the individual dc]
Are chemical trails (and possibly GMOs and vaccinations) delivering neural dust?
Each particle of neural dust. . .is coupled to a piezoelectric material that converts ultra-high-frequency sound waves into electrical
signals and vice versa. The neural dust is interrogated by another component. . .powered from outside the body. This generates the
ultrasound that powers the neural dust and sensors that listen for their response, rather like an RFID system.
13
After September 11, 2001, the new Department of Homeland Security (DHS) activated Oak Ridge
National Laboratory’s SensorNet program to begin integrating nano- and microsensors into real-time
detection and surveillance.
It is [in transportation and commerce] that the full scope of surveillance integration can be seen as a management strategy that
merges legislation, federal inspection systems, international standards, security threat assessments, and the latest in
nanotechnology.
14
At the close of 2003, Public Law 108-153, the “21st Century Nanotechnology Research and
Development Act,” quietly made its way through Congress. “The President shall implement a National
Nanotechnology Program. . .The activities of the Program shall include (1) developing a fundamental
understanding of matter that enables control and manipulation at the nanoscale . . .” Congress was assured
that nanotechnology was the “science of the future.” [quietly I am sure is an understatement, not looking forward to reading that Act of 2003 dc]
In 2005, the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars announced the moneymaking “Internet
of Things” (IoT) angle in its Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies:
To document the marketing and distribution of nano-enabled products into the commercial marketplace, the Woodrow Wilson
International Center for Scholars and the Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies created the Nanotechnology Consumer Products
Inventory (CPI) in 2005. . .The revised inventory was released in October 2013. It currently lists 1,814 consumer products from
622 companies in 32 countries. The Health and Fitness category contains the most products (762, or 42% of the total). Silver is the
most frequently used nanomaterial (435 products, or 24%); however, 49% of the products (889) included in the CPI do not provide
the composition of the nanomaterial used in them. About 29% of the CPI (528 products) contain nanomaterials suspended in a
variety of liquid media and dermal contact is the most likely exposure scenario from their use. The majority (1,288 products, or
71%) of the products do not present enough supporting information to corroborate the claim that nanomaterials are used . . .
15
Nano research boomed at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), the Department of Energy
research facility run by University of California Berkeley. Once the National Nanotechnology Program
was in place, all caution was consigned to the outer darkness of “national security.” In 2007, when the
City of Berkeley requested that the LBNL (and UC Berkeley) comply with a city ordinance requiring
corporations working with engineered nanoparticles to submit a toxicology report and “how the facility
will safely handle, monitor, contain, dispose, track inventory, prevent releases and mitigate such
materials,” neither institution complied.
16 A month later, UC Regents approved major expansion of LBNL,
virtually ignoring city and community outcries about toxic compounds in the soil and groundwater,
including polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons, hazardous metals, tritium, etc.
17 [ they do not care, it is called lawlessness dc]
For the most part, critical warnings and second thoughts about nanotechnology withered on the vine of
scientific journals, though the Journal of Nanoparticle Research did manage to publish “Nanotechnology
and the need for risk governance” about the “governance gap” between nano- and microtechnologies. (1
nanometer nm = 0.001 micron μm, a quantum world of difference.) From the Abstract:
. . .The novel attributes of nanotechnology demand different routes for risk-benefit assessment and risk management, and at
present, nanotechnology innovation proceeds ahead of the policy and regulatory environment. In the shorter term, the governance
gap is significant for those passive nanostructures that are currently in production and have high exposure rates; and is especially
significant for the several ‘active’ nanoscale structures and nanosystems that we can expect to be on the market in the near future.
Active nanoscale structures and nanosystems have the potential to affect not only human health and the environment but also
aspects of social lifestyle, human identity and cultural values . . .
18
[Emphasis added.]
But as is usual among sciences shanghaied by the military-industrial-intelligence complex, the
warning went nowhere. In fact, the sixty-page 2011 National Nanotechnology Initiative Strategic Plan
mandated that each government agency do its part to converge society with a nano-based “integrated
technology”:
• Department of Defense – persistent surveillance
• Intelligence Community – unmanned aircraft
• Department of Energy – energy and climate change
• Department of Homeland Security – sensor platforms
• Department of Justice – criminal justice
• Department of Transportation – modify travel behavior
• Environmental Protection Agency – environmental sensing
• Food & Drug Administration – biological systems
• National Institute of Food and Agriculture – global food
• National Institutes of Health – precise control for predictable outcomes
• Department of Treasury – economic sanctions
• National Science Foundation – education
Nanotechnology is seamlessly merging with the biosphere to take the place of what was once called
Nature.
Nanoparticles, because of their ultramicroscopic size, readily penetrate the skin, can invade underlying blood vessels, get into the
general bloodstream, and produce distant toxic effects.
19
On the seemingly benign medical side, nano-devices are being engineered to detect molecules,
enzymes, proteins, and genetics. “Microparticulate delivery systems” are in vaccines
20 and on the tips of
vaccination needles. Nanobots made of graphene are programmed to swim in the bloodstream to release
drugs. Tiny Janus particle motors made of gold and platinum can repair microcircuits when propelled by
a chemical reaction;
21 engines the size of atoms under cones of electromagnetic energy heated by lasers
can be pulsed in a heat-cool pattern to behave like pistons; and even biological nano-rockets are being
engineered by attaching strands of DNA as “catalytic engines” to a gold and chromium polystyrene bead:
When placed in a solution of hydrogen peroxide, the engine molecules caused a chemical reaction that produced oxygen bubbles,
forcing the rocket to move in the opposite direction. Shining a beam of ultraviolet light on one side of the rocket causes the DNA
to break apart, detaching the engines and changing the rocket’s direction of travel.
22
The genotoxicity (damage to DNA) of engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) may be the most concerning,
particularly for future generations. A 2013 paper in Environmental Science & Technology points to metal
oxide nanoparticles, fullerenes (molecules of carbon in the form of hollow spheres, ellipsoids, tubes,
etc.) and carbon nanotubes—all of which are implicated in chemical aerosols. Fullerenes assemble and
replicate, delivering and embedding their programmed metamaterials and pharma agents directly into the
host’s DNA.
. . .
it is currently postulated that ENPs cause nonspecific oxidative damage and that the resulting stress may be the predominant
cause of DNA damage and subsequent genotoxicity.
23
This self-assembly process is called Teslaphoresis and sounds disturbingly like descriptions by
Morgellons sufferers of the self-assembling fiber networks building grids throughout their bodies and at
times erupting from their scalps, gums, and skin. Teslaphoresis depends upon a Tesla coil force field for
remote directives to carbon nanotubes to self-assemble and extend in long wires that can be magnetically
reeled in and out:
“Electric fields have been used to move small objects, but only over short distances,” [Rice University chemist Paul] Cherukuri
said. “With Teslaphoresis, we have the ability to massively scale up force fields to move matter remotely. . .There are so many
applications where one could utilize strong force fields to control the behavior of matter in both biological and artificial systems.”
24
Telephoresis nanowires “grow and act like nerves,” simultaneously assembling and creating circuits
powered by force field energy. Cherukuri mentions how “patterned surfaces and multiple Tesla coil
systems could create more complex self-assembling circuits from nanoscale-sized particles”—like what
is being delivered by chemical trails, GMO foods, and vaccinations.
Disseminating nanoparticles makes sense if your objective is an “integrated technology” matrix for a
socio-biological “battlespace” AI-programmed for surveillance, detection, and two-way communication.
Think gigaflop microprocessors the size of molecules, MEMS (microelectromechanical systems) and
GEMS (global environmental MEMS) “smart” sensors and microprocessors (computers), and
magnetoelectric nanoparticles (MENs) gravitating to neurons in the brain.
We are now in the realm of optogenetics and deep brain stimulation (DBS), the manipulation of brain
cell activity by switching brain cells on and off with remote light or magnetic fields. All that is needed is
optical nanofibers programmed to deliver light to the brain, plus gold nanoparticles and nano-rods that
absorb light and convert it to heat. Iron oxide nanoparticulates (and other heavy metal oxides) give off
heat when exposed to an alternating magnetic field, “causing the neurons to fire long trains of nervous
impulses.”
25
Thus we can begin to piece together why military intelligence has bent over backwards to deceive the
public about nanotechnology and the chemical trails above. Wires, RFIDs and implants are no longer
necessary; remote access can be obtained and maintained by creating an external magnetic field in which
magnetic nanoparticles stimulate and respond to other magnetic fields outside (in vitro) and inside (in
vivo) the body to create signaling networks that control ion channels, neurons, and behavior.
26
The campaign to convince the public that controlling machines by thought alone is “progress” flies in
the face of the shouting inverse: that all of it—the chemical trails loaded with conducting metals and
nanobots, the nano GMO food additives, the cell phones and towers, the Internet of Things—is blasting us
toward a Transhumanist future in which tiny machines and their AI gods remote-control our brains.
The deployment of trillions of nanobots above and in our atmosphere with no proof of safety is a
planetary crime whose magnitude is difficult to measure—a crime for which neither national nor
international judiciary systems are prepared, a crime that makes twentieth-century Nazi crimes of
extermination and experimentation seem juvenile and clumsy.
We are being besieged by “metamaterial assemblies” that debilitate the planetary biosphere built and
maintained for untold eons by an extraordinary spiritual power we call Nature. The unstudied synergies
forming among chemicals, radiation, nanos, and living beings are leaving chronic immune-deficiency
illnesses and dying species in their secret wake. Nano-scale chemicals combine and share ions with
carbons, sunlight, radio waves, bacteria, mold, fungi, and algae, then mutate and integrate with DNA,
mutating it in the process. Mutations are inevitable when nanoscale thorium, strontium, aluminum, barium,
lithium, silver, styrene, polymers, liposomes, hydrogels, etc. overload cell communication.
“Smart dust” detects earthquakes and tracks weather systems, predicts traffic flow, monitors energy
use, and measures vibration, sound, temperature, and chemical signatures, and wireless sensor networks
(netscapes or mesh) monitor farms, factories, data centers, airports, and the atmosphere. Then there are
the tiny magnetometers, cameras, LiDAR and radar for tracking and surveillance. Then there is the “smart
dust” already in us, being daily delivered. All of it together is the “hive mind” communicating with itself
by wireless frequencies and with non-human AI's at 3-space bases, servants of the World Wide Web
27
in
service to Space Fence lockdown.
To paraphrase George Washington regarding dangerous servants and fearful masters, are our tiny
servants our future masters?
notes chapter 2
1 Michael Janitch, “3/08/2016 — US Military confirms HAARP ‘ring’ formed by Radio Waves hitting the Atmosphere / Ionosphere.”
2 Listen to “Konstantin Meyl Scalar Wave Interview with William Alek,” AdomHussein69, January 12, 2011. Meyl’s paper “Scalar Waves:
Advanced Concepts for Wireless Energy Transfer” can be found at www.k-meyl.de/go/Primaerliteratur/Wireless-Energy-Transfer.pdf.
3 Sound waves propagate similarly because they are a form of scalar wave, as is a gravitational wave or plasma wave. For more on the
speed of light no longer being considered a constant as in E=mc2, see Umer Abrar, “Speed of light not so constant after all — New
experiment proves.” Physics-Astronomy.com, January 2015.
4 Robert B. Laughlin, A Different Universe, Reinventing Physics from the Bottom Down. New York: Basic Books, 2005.
5 Alice Park, “Junk DNA — Not So Useless After All.” Time, September 6, 2012.
6 Each ether stage can be made to devolve into the previous stage or evolve into the next stage.
7 Clifford Carnicom recommends The Fourth State of Matter: An Introduction to Plasma Science by S. Eliezer and Y. Eliezer (Institute
of Physics Publishing, 1989).
8 Einstein, Albert. “Ether and the Theory of Relativity.” Address delivered May 5, 1920 at University of Leyden.
9 In his 1910 History of the Theories of Æther and Electricity, Whittaker credits Henri Poincaré (1854– 1912) and Hendrik Lorentz
(1853–1928) with developing special relativity and E=mc2, not Einstein.
10 Are these the Three Assassins of Freemasonry, which views itself as the gatekeeper of what the profane should and shouldn’t know?
Scientia est potential.
11 Zeeya, Morali, “Ether returns to oust dark matter.” New Scientist, 27 August 2012.
12 Laughlin, A Different Universe.
13 Carolyn Williams Palit, “What Chemtrails Really Are,” November 9, 2007.
14 “China to Study Gravitational Waves in Domestic Research Project.” Sputnik News, February 14, 2016.
15 “Physicists pinpoint source of gravitational waves to Pontiac Michigan 1987.” Kayfabe News, February 12, 2016.
16 Thomas Bearden, “Scalar Electromagnetics and Weather Control.” Esoteric Physics homepage, May 26, 1998. Bearden’s background:
Lieutenant Colonel U.S. Army (Retired); MS Nuclear Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology; BS Mathematics, Northeast Louisiana
University; graduate of Command & General Staff College, U.S. Army; graduate of Guided Missile Staff Officers’ Course, U.S. Army
(equivalent of MS in Aerospace Engineering); numerous electronic warfare and counter-countermeasures courses.
17 “A space laser could turn the Earth’s atmosphere into a giant magnifying glass and be used to spy on enemies in future wars.” BT.com,
18 January 2017. See “BAE Systems – Laser Developed Atmospheric Lens Force Shield Combat Situation” youtube.
18 Conversation with a passenger in a C-130 who saw a plasma shield go up over Gakona HAARP in 2015.
19 See Joanna Lillis, “The village that fell asleep: mystery illness perplexes Kazakh scientists.” The Guardian, 18 March 2015.
chapter 3
1.Low-frequency oscillations of ions in plasma and magnetic field perturbations.
2 M.B. Cohen et al. “Geometric Modulation: A more effective method of steerable ELF/VLF wave generation with continuous HF heating
of the lower atmosphere.” Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 35, 19 March 2008.
3 ELF/VLF radio waves (300Hz–30kHz) are so long (10–1,000 kilometers) that they are difficult to generate (much less sustain) with
ground antennas alone, which is what makes a “sky antenna” essential.
4 Thanks to William Thomas, “Nano Chemtrails,” July 17, 2014, chemtrailsmuststop.com/2014/07/an-explanation-of-nano-chemtrails/.
5 Elana Freeland, Chemtrails, HAARP, and the Full Spectrum Dominance of Planet Earth. Feral House, 2014.
6 Anne Ju, “Nanoparticles in food, vitamins could harm human health.” Cornell Chronicle, February 16, 2012.
7 “Groups Sue EPA over Faulty Approval of Nanotechnology Pesticide.” Center for Food Safety press release, July 27, 2015.
8 Michael Bastasch, “EPA’s ‘Independent’ Science Advisers Got $190 Million In Agency Grants.” The Daily Caller, May 17, 2016.
9 Col. Tamzy J. House et al., “Weather As A Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025.” Air Force 2025, Chapter 3, “System
Description,” August 1996.
10 Wikipedia: In physics, a plasmon is a quantum of plasma [ionized gas] oscillation. As light consists of photons, plasma oscillation consists
of plasmons.
11 Calvin Boerigter et al., “Mechanism of Charge Transfer from Plasmonic Nanostructures to Chemically Attached Materials.” American
Chemical Society ACS Nano, June 7, 2016. Also see “Plasmonic Nanoparticles and Nanostructures (Ivan Smalyukh),” NanoBio Node,
October 28, 2015 (Smalyukh’s talk at the BioNanotechnology Summer Institute ’15, July 29, 2015, 1 hour 17 min).
12 Nanotechnology Research Directions: Vision for Nanotechnology in the Next Decade, National Science and Technology Council,
1999; Chapter 10, “Nanoscale Processes and the Environment,” pp. 143–144.
13 “How Smart Dust Could Spy On Your Brain.” Technology Review, July 16, 2013. Also see Dongjin Seo et al., “Neural Dust: An
Ultrasonic, Low Power Solution For Chronic Brain-Machine Interfaces,” University of California, 8 July 2013. Ultrasound works far better
than direct electromagnetic waves in that there is less buildup of body heat, less signal-to-noise ratio, and it can transmit at least 10 million
times more power than EM waves at the same scale.
14 Michael Edwards, “How Close Are We to a Nano-based Surveillance State?” Activist Post, February 21, 2011.
15 Marina E. Vance et al., “Nanotechnology in the real world: Redeveloping the nanomaterial consumer products inventory.” Beilstein
Journal of Nanotechnology, August 21, 2015. All the research for this paper was done at Virginia Tech.
16 Judith Scherr, “UC, Lab Opt Out of Nanoparticle Report.” The Berkeley Daily Planet, June 5, 2007.
17 Richard Brenneman, “UC Regents Expected to Approve Lab’s Expansion.” The Berkeley Daily Planet, July 13, 2007.
18 O. Renn and M.C. Roco, “Nanotechnology and the need for risk governance.” Journal of Nanoparticle Research, April 2006.
19 “A Serious Warning about Nano-Technology in Cosmeceuticals.” Mercola.com, April 24, 2010.
20 Eric Farris et al., “Micro- and nanoparticulates for DNA vaccine delivery,” Experimental Biology and Medicine, 2016.
21 Todd Jaquith, “These Nanobots Can Repair Circuits All by Themselves.” Futurism, March 30, 2016.
22 Shutterstock, “Meet the nanomachines that could drive a medical revolution.” The Conversation, April 21, 2016.
23 Huanhua Wang et al., “Engineered Nanoparticles May Induce Genotoxicity.” Environmental Science & Technology, November 14,
2013.
24 Mike Williams, “Nanotubes assemble! Rice introduces ‘Teslaphoresis.’” Rice University, April 14, 2016. See
www.youtube.com/watch?v=w1d0Lg6wuvc.
25 See Carvalho-de-Souza, J.L. et al., “Photosensitivity of Neurons Enabled by Cell-Targeted Gold Nanoparticles” in Neuron, Vol. 86,
Issue 1, 8 April 2015; Chen, R. et al. “Wireless magnetothermal deep brain stimulation.” Science, March 27, 2015.
26 Ellen Goldbaum, “With Magnetic Nanoparticles, Scientists Remotely Control Neurons and Animal Behavior.” University of Buffalo at
SUNY, July 6, 2010.
27 John D. Sutter, “’Smart dust’ aims to monitor everything.” CNN, May 3, 2010
83s
FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. As a journalist, I am making such material available in my efforts to advance understanding of artistic, cultural, historic, religious and political issues. I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Copyrighted material can be removed on the request of the owner.
No comments:
Post a Comment