V: FINAL SOLUTION: VACCINES OR BUST
“The only means to fight a plague is honesty.”
—Albert Camus,
The Plague (1947)
During the spring of 2020, Dr. Fauci and Bill Gates carpet bombed the airwaves, bearishly predicting that a “miraculous vaccine” would stop COVID transmission, prevent illness, end the pandemic, and release humanity from house arrest. Even vaccinology most stalwart tub thumpers—true believers like Dr. Peter Hotez and Dr. Paul Offit—regarded those forecasts as far-fetched and foolhardy. 1,2 After all, for decades, two perilous and seemingly insurmountable impediments had thwarted every attempt to craft a coronavirus vaccine.
Leaky Vaccines
The first obstacle was the coronavirus’s tendency to rapidly
mutate, producing vaccine-resistant variants. Vaccine
developers like Hotez and Offit doubted that, after decades
of futile efforts, researchers could suddenly develop a
COVID vaccine that would provide “sterilizing immunity,”
meaning that it would completely obliterate viral colonies
in vaccinated individuals and prevent transmission and
mutation.
As if to confirm such fears, in May of that year, Britain’s
top vaccinologist, Andrew Pollard, admitted that the Oxford
University’s government-funded and patriotically
ballyhooed AstraZeneca vaccine had failed to achieve
sterilizing immunity in monkeys; the inoculated macaques,
even when asymptomatic, continued to support high viral
loads in their nasal pharynxes.3 Then in August, Dr. Fauci
primped up the dismaying news of similar failures by all the
competing candidates with a kind of celebratory bravado.
Instead of declaring defeat and retreating to the drawing
board, Dr. Fauci cheerfully announced that none of the
first-generation COVID vaccines was likely to prevent
transmission.4
That news should have cratered the entire
project. Leading virologists, including Nobel Laureate Luc
Montagnier, pointed out that a non-sterilizing, or “leaky,”
vaccine could not arrest transmission and would therefore
fail to stop the pandemic.5 Even worse, vaccinated
individuals, he warned, would become asymptomatic
carriers and “mutant factories” blasting out vaccine resistant versions of the disease that were likely to
lengthen and intensify rather than abbreviate the
pandemic.
But Tony Fauci and his partner, Bill Gates, seemed to
have a strategy for neutralizing the variant threat. The two
men had put billions of taxpayer and tax-deducted dollars
into developing an mRNA platform for vaccines that, in
theory, would allow them to quickly produce new
“boosters” to combat each new “escape variant.” This
scheme was Big Pharma’s holy grail. Vaccines are one of
the rare commercial products that multiply profits by
failing. Each new booster doubles the revenues from the
initial jab. Since NIAID co-owned the mRNA patent,6 the
agency stood to make billions from its coronavirus gambit
by producing successive boosters for every new variant;
the more, the better!
The good news for Pharma was that
all of humanity would be permanently dependent on
biannual or even triannual booster shots. Dr. Peter
McCullough warned that mass vaccination with a leaky
vaccine during a pandemic “would put the world on a
never-ending booster treadmill.”7 That kind of talk had
Pharma popping champagne corks. In October 2021, Pfizer
announced that it was projecting an astonishing $26 billion
in revenues from its COVID boosters.8
Pathogenic Priming
The even more daunting obstacle to coronavirus vaccines
was their tendency to induce “pathogenic priming”—also
known as “antibody-dependent enhancement” (ADE)—an
overstimulation of immune system response that can cause
severe injuries and death when vaccinated individuals
subsequently encounter the wild viruses. In early
experiments, coronavirus vaccines produced a robust
immune response in both animals and children—
temporarily heartening researchers—but then tragically
killing the vaccine recipients upon re-exposure to the wild
virus, or making them vulnerable to uniquely debilitating
infections. Early in 2020, vaccinology most brass-bound
commissars warned of this pitfall as Dr. Fauci unleashed
the industry, with billions in federal lucre, to gin up COVID
inoculations at record pace. In his March 5, 2020 testimony
before the House Science, Space and Technology
Committee on Coronavirus, Bill Gates’s paid mouthpiece,
Dr. Peter Hotez, cautioned:9
One of the things we’re not hearing a lot about is the unique
potential safety problem of coronavirus vaccines. With certain types
of respiratory virus vaccines you get immunized, and then when you
get actually exposed to the virus, you get this kind of paradoxical
immune enhancement phenomenon.10
Dr. Hotez confessed to the committee that his colleagues
had killed a number of children from pathogenic priming
during experiments with the respiratory syncytial virus
(RSV) vaccines in 1966, and recounted that during his own
earlier work on coronavirus vaccines, he saw the same
effect on ferrets:
We started developing coronavirus vaccines and our colleagues—we
noticed in laboratory animals that they started to show some of the
same immune pathology. So we said, “Oh my God, this is going to be
problematic.”
In an April 26, 2020 interview with Pharma troll Dr. Zubin
“ZDogg” Damania, MD, Merck’s top vaccine promoter, Dr.
Paul Offit, amplified these concerns:11
Binding antibodies can be dangerous and cause something called
Antibody Dependent Enhancement. And we’ve seen that. I mean, we
saw that with the [Gates-funded] dengue vaccine. But with the
dengue vaccine, in children who had never been exposed to dengue
before, it actually made them worse when they were then exposed to
the natural virus. Much worse. Vaccinated children who were less
than nine years of age, who had never been exposed to dengue
before, were more likely to die if they’d been vaccinated than if
they hadn’t been vaccinated.12
And even Dr. Anthony Fauci, during his March 26, 2020,
White House coronavirus briefing, acknowledged the perils
of pathogenic priming:13
The issue of safety is something I want to make sure the American
public understands: does the vaccine make you worse? And there are
diseases, in which you vaccinate someone, they get infected with
what you’re trying to protect them with [sic] and you actually
enhance the infection. That’s the worst possible thing you could
do—is vaccinate somebody to prevent infection and actually
make them worse. (emphasis added)
Dr. Fauci must have recognized that since vaccine makers
had immunity from liability [which he had helped arrange]
and were playing, as it were, with house money [which he
diverted to them through NIH], these companies had little
incentive to invest in the kind of long-term studies
necessary to eliminate the pathogenic priming hazard. In
retrospect, it seems that Dr. Fauci and his confederates had
at least six strategies for dealing with this grim risk. All six
tactics involved hiding the evidence of ADE if it did occur:
1) Dr. Fauci’s first approach was to abort the three year clinical trials at six months and then vaccinate
the controls—a preemption that would prevent
detection of long-term injuries, including pathogenic
priming. Regulators initially intended the Pfizer vaccine
trial to continue for three full years, until May 2, 2023.14
Because the FDA allowed Pfizer to unblind and terminate
its study after six months—and to offer the vaccine to
individuals in the placebo group—we will never know
whether vaccinated individuals in the trial suffered long term injuries, including pathogenic priming, that cancelled
out short-term benefits. Science and experience tell us that
many vaccines can cause injuries like cancers, autoimmune
diseases, allergies, fertility problems, and neurological
illnesses with long-term diagnostic horizons or long
incubation periods. A six-month study will hide these
harms.
2) Second, as COVID czar, Dr. Fauci stubbornly
refused to fix HHS’s designed-to-fail vaccine injury
surveillance system (VAERS), which systematically
suppresses reporting of most vaccine injuries. The
Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is a
passive, voluntary system, jointly managed by the CDC and
FDA, that accepts reports from anyone. A 2010 HHS study
of the government’s notoriously dysfunctional VAERS
concluded that VAERS detects “fewer than 1 percent of
vaccine injuries.”15
Put another way, VAERS misses OVER
99 percent of vaccine injuries, thereby lending the illusion
of safety to even the most deadly inoculations. In 2010, the
federal Agency for Health Care Research Quality (AHRQ)
designed and field-tested a state-of-the-art machine counting (AI) system as an efficient alternative to VAERS.
By testing the system for several years on the Harvard
Pilgrim HMO, AHRQ proved that it could capture most
vaccine injuries. AHRQ initially planned to roll out the
system to all remaining HMOs, but after seeing the AHRQ’s
frightening results—vaccines were causing serious injuries
in 1 of every 40 recipients—CDC killed the project and
stowed the new system on a dusty shelf. Dr. Fauci left that
system safely cached, throughout the pandemic, allowing
HHS’s broken voluntary system to continue to conceal
vaccine injuries, including any evidence of pathogenic
priming.
3) Third, Dr. Fauci’s trump card was his capacity to
enlist mainstream and social media companies to
make reporting of injuries and deaths disappear from
the airwaves, newspapers, and the Internet, and
therefore from the public consciousness. Facebook,
Google, and the television networks purged doctors and
scientists who reported pathogenic priming, and censored
reports about the waves of other vaccine injuries. As a
federal official sworn for four decades to uphold the
Constitution, Dr. Fauci should have been the champion of
free speech and vigorous debate during the pandemic.
Instead, he worked hand in glove with Bill Gates, Mark
Zuckerberg, and other Big Tech titans to censor criticism of
his various mandates and suppress information about
vaccine injuries, including discussions of pathogenic
priming.16,17
Email traffic shows that Dr. Fauci colluded
directly with Mark Zuckerberg and the social media
platforms to censor doctors who reported vaccine failures,
harms, and deaths, to deplatform public health advocates
like myself, and to evict and muzzle patients who reported
their own injuries. The science journals, utterly dependent
on Pharma advertising, obligingly refused to publish
studies on the rash of deadly and debilitating jab reactions.
The Bill Gates-funded fact-checking organization,
Politifact,18 worked with Pharma-funded fact-checkers like
FactCheck, which receives, funding from the Robert Wood
Johnson Foundation, and whose current CEO is Richard
Besser, former acting head of the CDC, which owns $1.8
billion in Johnson & Johnson stock19,20 to “debunk” stories
and studies of vaccine injuries.
On October 7, 2021, Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of
the mRNA vaccine, complained in a tweet that America’s
people were almost utterly blind to the floods of adverse
vaccine events that were killing and debilitating their
countrymen: “The real problem here is the damn press and
the internet giants. The press and these tech players act to
manufacture and reinforce ‘consensus’ around selected and
approved narratives. And then this is being weaponized to
attack dissenters, including highly qualified physicians.”21
4) Fourth, Dr. Fauci allowed CDC to discourage
autopsies in deaths following vaccination. CDC refused
to recommend autopsies on deaths reported to VAERS.
That omission allowed the agency to repeatedly make the
audacious, fraudulent declaration that all the 16,000
reported deaths following vaccination by October 2021
were “unrelated to the vaccines.” The regulatory agencies
thereby abolished vaccine deaths and injuries by fiat.
Instead of exposing this sort of rank deception by
government authorities, media and social media enablers
emboldened HHS to new nadirs in regulatory malpractice.
In January of 2021, baseball superstar Hank Aaron, whom I
knew, died seventeen days after receiving the COVID jab at
a CDC-sponsored press conference in Atlanta. I observed,
in a Defender article,22 that Aaron’s death was one of a
wave of deaths among the elderly following COVID jabs.
This was true, but the New York Times nevertheless vilified
me for spreading “misinformation” and claimed that the
Fulton County Coroner had determined that Aaron’s death
was “unrelated to vaccines.” USA Today, Newsweek, TIME,
Daily Beast, ABC, CNN, and CBS reported the Times
claim.23 But when I called to verify their claim, the Fulton
County Coroner told me that the office has never seen
Aaron’s body and that no autopsy was ever performed.
Aaron’s family had buried the home-run hero without a
postmortem.
The Times’ fabrication was part of the
systematic campaign of deception, propaganda, and
censorship by HHS regulators in partnership with
mainstream media—almost unprecedented in the American
experience—that helped conceal the tsunami of vaccine
injuries and fatalities.
“Anthony Fauci is a great guy in the same way that
Harvey Weinstein was a great guy,” says Jeff Hanson, the
chairman of a large publicly traded healthcare corporation.
“It all changed when widespread private knowledge about
him crossed the transom into public knowledge. Weinstein,
too, had powerful mainstream media outfits watching his
back.
Incidentally, autopsy reports from other nations are
revealing exactly the sorts of information that CDC,
understandably, wants to protect Americans from learning.
In September 2021, veteran German pathologists and
professors Dr. Arne Burkhardt, who served as director of
the Institute of Pathology in Reutlingen for 18 years, and
Dr. Walter Lang, chief of a leading lung pathology institute
for 35 years, performed autopsies on ten cadavers of
individuals who died following vaccination, finding that five
were very likely, and two more probably, related to the
jab.24
In three cases, they found strong evidence of lethal
multi-system inflammation and runaway autoimmunity,
including rare autoimmune diseases, like Hashimoto’s, an
autoimmune-triggered hypothyroidism; leukoclastic
vasculitis, an inflammatory reaction in the capillaries that
leads to skin bleeding, and Sjögren’s syndrome, an
inflammation of the salivary and lacrimal glands. “Three
autoimmune diseases in a total of ten is a strikingly high
rate,” said Professor Lang. The doctors also found large
clusters of endothelial cells detached from the walls of
blood vessels, and clumps of red blood cells that cause
thrombosis, and giant cells that formed around trapped
foreign bodies. Lang said he had not seen anything like
these clusters of lymphocytes in hundreds of thousands of
pathological studies: “The lymphocytes are running amok
in all organs.” Lang faulted government regulators for
hindering autopsies on vaccine reactions: “We’re missing
out on 90 percent.”
5) Fifth, Dr. Fauci populated the key FDA and CDC
committees with NIAID, NIH, and Gates Foundation
grantees and loyalists to insure rubber-stamp
approvals for his mRNA vaccines, without any long term injury studies. More than half of FDA’s VRBPAC
committee, which approved EUAs for Moderna, Johnson &
Johnson, and Pfizer, and granted final licensure to the
Pfizer vaccine, were grant recipients from NIH, NIAID,
BMGF, and pharmaceutical companies.25,26 More than half
the CDC’s ACIP committee participants were similarly
compromised.
6) Sixth, by vaccinating the entire population, Dr.
Fauci seems to be striving to eliminate the control
group, to hide vaccine injuries. In a 2015 interview, Dr.
Fauci said:
I mean, if a parent really feels strongly against
[vaccination], that parent can get an exemption. So there’s
never a situation where someone is going to tie you down
and vaccinate you or say you can’t go to any schools at all if
you’re not vaccinated. Nowhere should you force someone
to do anything.27
In the run-up to the rollout, Dr. Fauci frequently
repeated his ethical antipathy against mandating
vaccination. But once the voluntary market reached
saturation, those scruples melted away and, following his
guidance, the federal policies began treating the vaccine hesitant as dangerous public enemies. “Our patience is
wearing thin,” warned Joe Biden during a national address
on September 9, 2021.28
Dr. Fauci presided over a progression of increasingly
draconian forms of coercion to compel vaccination of the
entire population. With his open encouragement,
universities, schools, businesses, hospitals, public
employers, and a litany of other societal power centers
simultaneously launched numbing waves of strong-arm
tactics to compel unwilling Americans to submit to
vaccination, including threats of discrimination, job loss,
exclusion from schools, parks, sports and entertainment
venues, bars, restaurants, military service, public
employment, travel, and health care. The unvaccinated
experienced exclusion, marginalization, vilification, purges
by social media platforms and mainstream media, as well
as threats of violence, incarceration, legal reprisals, and
deprivation of rights.
In October 2021, New York Governor
Kathy Hochul promised to deny driver’s licenses and
automobile registration to the unvaccinated. New York City
Mayor Bill de Blasio threatened to exclude the
unvaccinated from subways, gyms, bars, and businesses. A
Colorado hospital announced the removal of unvaccinated
patients from its lists of those eligible for organ
transplants. Observing that some 25 percent of African
Americans were unvaccinated, civil rights leader Kevin
Jenkins declared, “This is the new Jim Crow.”
Whether intentional or not, the effect of this escalation
was, increasingly, to eliminate the control group—which,
coincidentally, would permanently hide the evidence of
vaccine injuries. This motivation alone explains Dr. Fauci’s
reckless and ferocious drive to vaccinate every last
American, even those who have natural immunity and
nothing to gain from vaccination, Americans below fifty,
even kindergarten-age children with zero risk from COVID,
and pregnant women, despite a nearly complete lack of
information about the jab’s impact on the fetus.
Dr. Fauci
continued to insist that fully vaccinating the entire
population was the only path to ending the pandemic. This
assertion ignored the fact that COVID vaccines prevent
neither transmission nor infection, nor reductions in viral
loads. Overwhelming science has proven that vaccinated
and unvaccinated individuals are equally likely to spread
disease. A September 2021 Israeli study demonstrating
that natural immunity provides 27x better protection
against COVID than the Pfizer vaccine is just one of 29
recently published peer-reviewed studies that vouch for the
superiority of natural immunity.
29,30 What, then, is
motivating the fierce campaign to nevertheless coercively
vaccinate the vaccine-resistant 25 percent, other than a
strategy to eliminate the control group to hide the deaths
and injuries?
* * *
By November 2021, that retinue of concerning devices
largely succeeded in concealing from Americans the well established facts that Dr. Fauci’s vaccines neither
prevented the disease nor its transmission, and that COVID
vaccines were killing and injuring record numbers of
Americans. The relentless broadcast of frightening and
purposefully inflated COVID death reports stoked fears of
the contagion that convinced many Americans to believe
the government’s mantra that COVID vaccines were “safe
and effective” and that, to the extent they weren’t, “the
vaccines cause more good than harm.”
Physicians and scientists complained that Dr. Fauci’s
vaccine promotions constituted a vast, unprecedented
population-wide experiment, with shady recordkeeping and
no control group. Meanwhile, the actual data suggested
that the COVID vaccines were causing far more deaths
than they were averting.
The Pfizer Vaccine: A Cold Look at the
Shocking Data
At this book’s November 2021 publication date, only
Pfizer’s COVID vaccine, known as Comirnaty, had won FDA
approval. Although Comirnaty is not yet given in the United
States, its counterpart—the Pfizer-BioNTech, the same
vaccine under a different name—is, so I will focus on the
Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. As of October 6, US health
officials had administered more than 230 million doses of
Pfizer’s COVID vaccine, compared to 152 million doses of
Moderna, and 15 million doses of Johnson & Johnson.31
The final summary of the Pfizer’s six-month clinical trial
data—the document that Pfizer submitted to FDA to win
approval—revealed one key data point that should have
killed that intervention forever. Far more people died in the
vaccine group than in the placebo group during Pfizer’s
clinical trials. The fact that FDA nevertheless granted
Pfizer full approval, and that the medical community
embraced and prescribed this intervention for their
patients, is eloquent testimony to the resilience of even the
most deadly and inefficacious products, and the
breathtaking power of the pharmaceutical industry and its
government allies to control the narrative through captive
regulators, compliant physicians, and media manipulation,
and to overwhelm the fundamental common sense of much
of humanity.
The Pfizer vaccine trial offers a lesson on the perils of
ignoring “all-cause mortality” as the governing endpoint for
vaccine approval. But before we talk about “all-cause
mortality,” let’s look at the evidence that convinced FDA to
grant Pfizer its license.
Mathematical Chicanery: Relative
Risk vs. Absolute Risk
On the next page is Pfizer’s table S4 that summarizes death
data from Pfizer’s six-month clinical trial. This was Pfizer’s
final report to FDA; the study by then was unblinded and
over.
32 As anyone can see, Pfizer won FDA’s approval
despite the rather pathetic showing that its vaccine might
prevent one COVID death in every 22,000 vaccine
recipients.
So, how did Pfizer transform its unimpressive record of
eliminating a single COVID fatality among 22,000
vaccinated subjects into a $5 billion/year success story? By
gulling the public with a deceptive measure called “relative
risk,” instead of the presumptive and far more useful
measure of “absolute risk.”
The table shows that during the six-month trial, two
people in the placebo group numbering approximately
22,000 and only one in the similarly sized vaccine group
died from COVID. Believe it or not, this data point is the
source of Pfizer’s claim that the vaccine is 100 percent
efficacious against death. Since only one person died from
COVID in the vaccine group and two died in the placebo
group, Pfizer can technically represent that the vaccine is a
100 percent improvement over the placebo. After all, the
number “2” is 100 percent greater than the number “1,”
right? The media winked at this canard, obligingly
reporting Pfizer’s extraordinary 100 percent efficacy claim.
At least some reporters must have understood that most
Americans hearing this statistic would naturally believe
that the vaccine would prevent 100 percent of deaths.
A
more honest—and helpful—way of thinking about the Pfizer
vaccine’s efficacy is to consider that 22,000 vaccines must
be given to save a single life from COVID. Equally
concerning, every virologist and infectious disease expert
knew that the true reduction in risk of 1/22,000—or about
0.01 percent, as the BMJ reported— was far too
insignificant to make the vaccine even a minor barrier
against the spread of COVID. It’s axiomatic that any
vaccine that does not prevent transmission and that spares
only 1 in 22,000 from death from the target contagion has
no ability to stop a pandemic.33
“Because the clinical trial
showed that vaccines reduce absolute risk less than 1
percent (See: Brown R. and colleagues from Waterloo in
Canada), those vaccines can’t possibly influence epidemic
curves. It’s mathematically impossible,” explains Peter
McCullough. Nevertheless, Dr. Fauci continued to promote
the vaccine as the ultimate panacea.
The entire justification that Gates and Dr. Fauci had
been trumpeting for a year— that their vaccines would end
the pandemic—was now so much exploded shrapnel.
Nevertheless, Dr. Fauci continued to claim that full
vaccination of the entire population was the only way to
end the pandemic. He thereby justified his insistence that
Americans submit to mass vaccination.
But the story gets even worse. As table S4 shows, this
entire meager advantage of preventing a single COVID
death in every 22,000 vaccinated individuals (1/22,000) is
entirely cancelled out by a fivefold increase in excess fatal
cardiac arrests and congestive heart failures in vaccinated
individuals (5/22,000). Pfizer and its regulatory magician,
Dr. Fauci, used smoke and mirrors to divert public attention
from this all-important question of all-cause mortality.
Pfizer reported five additional deaths in the vaccinated group before
unblinding the study that the company failed to tabulate in Table S4.
All-Cause Mortality
“All-cause mortality” should be the key metric in weighing
the value of any medical intervention. That measure alone
tells us whether vaccinated individuals enjoy better
outcomes and longer lives than the unvaccinated. Drugs
and vaccines that appear, at first glance, effective against
the target disease may, over longer terms, trigger deaths
from unexpected causes: accidents, cancers, heart attacks,
seizures, even depression and suicide—or from pathogenic
priming—which cancel out the short-term benefits of the
intervention. As we shall see in the next two chapters, Dr.
Fauci learned, at the outset of his career, to find excuses
for abbreviating clinical trials of toxic medications to keep
long-term mortalities invisible and to cloud overall
cost/benefit assessments.
Pfizer’s six-month clinical data for its COVID vaccine
trials suggested that, while the vaccine would avert a
single death from COVID-19, the vaccinated group suffered
4x the number of lethal heart attacks as the unvaccinated.
In other words, there was no mortality benefit from the
vaccines; for every life saved from COVID, there were four
excess heart attack fatalities.34 Twenty people died of “allcause mortality” among the 22,000 recipients in Pfizer’s
vaccine group, versus only fourteen in the numerically
comparable placebo group. (Pfizer was evidently so
alarmed by the total number of deaths in its vaccine cohort
that it omitted five of them from table S4, and only
disclosed them in fine print buried in the body of its
report.)
That means there were 42.8 percent more deaths
in the vaccine than in the placebo groups. Under FDA
guidelines, researchers must attribute all injuries and
deaths among the study group during clinical trials to the
intervention (the vaccine) unless proven otherwise.35
Under this rule, the FDA must assume people who take the
vaccine have a 42.8 percent increased risk of dying.
This six-month safety report was so damning that it
should have closed the case against this vaccine, but
captured FDA officials nevertheless gave Pfizer their
approval; the broken VAERS system and the mainstream
and social media all conspired to conceal the evidence of
the crime when vaccinated Americans began dying in
droves, and CDC implemented its own retinue of
enshrouding machinations to cloak the real-life carnage.
Did US Cases and Deaths Drop After
the National Vaccination Campaign
Began?
Dr. Fauci and the vaccine lobby began an opportunistic
campaign of deception by claiming credit for their jabs
when COVID-19 deaths dropped precipitously in midDecember, 2020, just after the vaccine rollout began. But
the first Pfizer jab had reached only 27 million Americans
(about 8 percent of the population) by February 1, and—
according to the CDC—the jab takes at least sixty days to
provide protection, so vaccines had little if anything to do
with the drop. By mid-April, only 31 percent of Americans
were vaccinated and even by June 15, only 48 percent had
been jabbed. The January drop-off was probably from
natural herd immunity—thanks to the spread of natural
infections over the previous year—and widespread use of
ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine following Pierre Kory’s
December 5 Senate testimony,
36 and the proliferation of six
nationwide telemedicine clinics and several large networks
of independent physicians that began early treatment of
about one-fourth to one-third of all new infections in
January.
Americans wouldn’t see the true impacts of vaccines on
US mortalities until summer. But let’s look, for a moment,
at what happened in other countries with faster rollouts,
less guileful regulators, and more scrupulous data
collection and reporting.
International Databases: Infection
Increases Following COVID Vaccines
Virtually all the countries that implemented rapid and
aggressive COVID-19 vaccine campaigns experienced
dramatic spikes in COVID infections. This documentation of
increased susceptibility to COVID among highly vaccinated
populations hints at the onset of the dreaded pathogenic
priming in the months following mass vaccination.37
Gibraltar
The world’s most vaccinated nation, Gibraltar, aggressively
inoculated its 34,000 inhabitants, achieving 115 percent
coverage (officials also vaccinated Spanish tourists) by July
2021. In December 2020, prior to the vaccine rollout,
Gibraltar’s health agency had experienced only 1,040
confirmed cases and five deaths from COVID-19. After the
vaccination blitz, the number of new infections increased
fivefold—to 5,314—and the number of deaths increased
nineteen-fold.38
Malta
Malta, another of Europe’s vaccine champions,
administered 800,000 doses to its 500,000 inhabitants,
achieving vaccine coverage of nearly 84 percent over six
months. But beginning in July 2021, the epidemic and
fatalities surged, forcing the authorities to impose new
restrictions and to admit that vaccination cannot shield the
population from COVID.
39
Iceland
By July 2021, Iceland vaccinated 80 percent of its 360,000
inhabitants with one vaccine and 75 percent with two. But
by mid-July, new daily infections had risen from about ten
to about 120 before stabilizing at a rate higher than the
pre-vaccination period. This sudden recurrence convinced
Iceland’s chief epidemiologist, Þórólfur Guðnason, of the
impossibility of achieving herd immunity through
vaccination.40 “It’s a myth,” he publicly declared. “In
Iceland, people no longer believe in herd immunity,”
according to oncologist and statistician Dr. Gérard
Delépine.41
Belgium
By June 2021, Belgium had vaccinated nearly 75 percent of
its 11.5 million population with one jab, and 65 percent
with two. However, by the end of June 2021, new daily
infections had risen from less than 500 to nearly 2,000.
Belgian health officials acknowledged that the current
vaccines cannot stop COVID, nor protect Belgium’s
citizens.42
Singapore
Singapore vaccinated nearly 80 percent of the population
of 5,703,600 with at least one dose by the end of July 2021.
But in late August, the country faced an exponential
resumption of the epidemic. Daily cases increased from
about ten in June to more than 150 at the end of July, and
1,246 cases on September 24.43
Britain
By July 2021, the United Kingdom had inoculated over 70
percent of its 67 million Brits with one shot, and 59 percent
with both. Nevertheless, by mid-July Great Britain was
suffering 60,000 new cases per day.
44 Faced with record
viral surges, Britain’s leading vaccinologist, Andrew
Pollard, leader of the Oxford Vaccine Group, acknowledged
before Parliament: collective immunity through vaccination
is a myth.45
Even more worrying, British data compiled by Will Jones
for the Daily Sceptic from August 2020 show a NEGATIVE
VACCINE EFFECTIVENESS of -53 percent for the over-40
age group. Reported infections are highest in the double vaccinated. This means that fully vaccinated individuals
from this age group experienced a 53 percent HIGHER
reported infection rate than the unvaccinated that month.
Rather than preventing cases, the vaccine may be
enhancing transmission. This disproportionate number
of vaccinated persons who seem to be sickening and dying
strongly suggests that the world is beginning to see the
predicted expression of pathogenic priming.46
Israel
Israel, champion of the Pfizer injection and pioneer of
draconian mass vaccination mandates, inoculated 70
percent of its nine million people with at least one shot, and
nearly 90 percent of those at risk with two, by June 2021.
Israel, which formerly boasted itself the template for
ruthless vaccine efficiency, is now the global model for
vaccine failure.47
The epidemic rebounded in Israel stronger than ever in
July, with a national record of 11,000 new cases recorded in
a single day (September 14, 2021), surpassing by nearly 50
percent the previous peaks in January 2021 during the
outbreak following the first Pfizer injections.48
On August 1, 2021, the director of Israel’s Public Health
Services, Dr. Sharon Alroy-Preis, announced half of all
COVID-19 infections were among the fully vaccinated.
Signs of more serious disease among fully vaccinated are
also emerging, she said, particularly in those over the age
of 60.49
68 Nations and 3,000 US Counties
An October 3, 2021 study by scientists at Harvard’s T.H.
Chan School of Public Health compared vaccination rates
for 68 nations and 2,947 counties across America as of
September 21, and compared them to COVID-19 cases per
one million people. Their report concludes that nations and
counties with higher vaccination rates do not experience
lower per capita Sars-CoV-2 cases.50,51
Pathogenic Priming? COVID Vaccines
Are
Linked to Increased Deaths and
Hospitalizations
By August 2021, Dr. Fauci, the CDC, and White House
officials were reluctantly conceding that vaccination would
neither stop illness nor transmission, but nevertheless, they
told Americans that the jab would, in any case, protect
them against severe forms of the disease or death. (It’s
worth mentioning that HCQ and ivermectin could have
accomplished this same objective at a tiny fraction of its
price.) Dr. Fauci and President Biden, presumably with Dr.
Fauci’s prompting, told Americans that 98 percent of
serious cases, hospitalizations, and deaths were among the
unvaccinated. This was a lie. Real-world data from nations
with high COVID jab rates show the complete converse of
this narrative; the resumption of infections in all those
countries accompanied an explosion of hospitalizations,
severe cases and deaths among the vaccinated!
Mortalities across the globe, in fact, have tracked Pfizer’s
deadly clinical trial results, with the vaccinated dying in
higher numbers than the non-vaccinated. These data
cemented suspicions that the feared phenomenon of
pathogenic priming has arrived, and is now wreaking
havoc.
Gibraltar
Following its pioneering world-record vaccine rollout,
Gibraltar saw an immediate spike in deaths, suffering 2,853
fatalities per million inhabitants, a European per capita
mortality record. During the first days of the rollout—which
began with senior citizens—some 84 elderly died
immediately after vaccination. Gibraltar’s shell-shocked
Governor General said it was the largest mortalities ever
suffered in the nation, exceeding even those endured
during World War II.
England
Over a period of seven months preceding October 2021,
some 60 percent of those 2,542 Brits who died from COVID
were double vaccinated. Of people hospitalized in the UK
for COVID in the last seven months, 157,000 were double vaccinated.52 There were more per capita deaths among
the “fully” vaccinated than the unvaccinated.53 The UK
government’s latest Office for National Statistics report on
mortality rates by COVID vaccination status shows that for
age-adjusted mortality rate, the death rate by October 2021
was higher among the vaccinated than the unvaccinated.54
Wales
According to October 2021 data from public health officials
in Wales, UK, vaccinated individuals accounted for
shocking 87 percent of all new COVID hospitalizations.55
Only 80 percent of Welsh were then fully vaccinated. In
other words, only 13 percent of severe cases that required
a trip to the hospital were unvaccinated, suggesting that
those who have taken the experimental vaccine are more
likely to experience adverse reactions and become
hospitalized from COVID-19.
Scotland
In Scotland, official data on hospitalizations and deaths for
October 2021 showed 87 percent of those who had died
from COVID-19 in the third wave that began in early July
were vaccinated. Only 70 percent of Scots were, at the
time, fully vaccinated.56
Israel
In Israel, an increase in hospitalizations accompanied the
epidemic’s ferocious resumption. The vaccinated
represented the majority of those hospitalized. By the end
of July, some 71 percent of the 118 seriously and critically
ill Israelis were fully vaccinated! This proportion of
seriously ill people vaccinated is much higher than the
proportion of fully vaccinated people: 61 percent.
According to Israel’s official report, August deaths were
more frequent among fully vaccinated patients (679) than
among non-vaccinated patients (390), belying official
claims of a protective effect of the vaccine against dying.
On August 5, 2021, Dr. Kobi Haviv, director of the Herzog
Hospital in Jerusalem, reported on Channel 13 News that
95 percent of severely ill COVID-19 patients are fully
vaccinated, and that vaccinated Israelis make up 85
percent to 90 percent of COVID-related hospitalizations
overall.57 As the doubly vaccinated overwhelmed Israeli
hospitals, the government announced in August a new plan
for coping with its “Pandemic of the Vaccinated.” Israel
said it will “update” its definition of “full vaccination” to
require three, or even four, injections. “We are updating
what it means to be vaccinated,” said Israel’s COVID czar,
Salman Zarka.
Vermont
Vermont is America’s most vaccinated state. On October
10, 2021, with 86 percent of its citizens fully vaccinated
(according to COVID Dashboard), Vermont officials
nevertheless reported the largest rate of infections ever—
and revealed that more than three-quarters of Vermont’s
September COVID-19 deaths occurred in the “fully
vaccinated.” Unvaccinated accounted for only eight of the
state’s 33 virus deaths that month, and officials declined to
reveal whether those eight were partially vaccinated. A
department spokesman explained to Lifesite News that the
breakthrough cases may reflect failing vaccine efficacy, as
those who died were likely “among the very first to be
vaccinated.” As hospitalizations approached the pandemic
peak, September turned into Vermont’s second-deadliest
month during the pandemic, according to the Associated
Press.
Cape Cod
In my own hometown in Cape Cod, Massachusetts, a CDC
investigation of an outbreak in Barnstable County, between
July 6 through July 25, found 74 percent of those who
received a diagnosis of COVID-19, and 80 percent of
hospitalizations, were among the fully vaccinated.58 COVID
resurgence and soaring breakthrough cases have plagued
most of heavily-vaccinated New England, including
Massachusetts, which has a vaccination rate nearly as
perfect as Vermont’s. COVID-19 cases were more than four
times higher in the Bay State in September 2021 compared
to the previous September. Half the deaths were among the
fully jabbed and with an unknown number among partially
vaxxed.
New England’s COVID vaccine failure reflects an
alarming national trend. A September report from the US
Department of Defense revealed that 71 percent of recent
cases of those hospitalized for COVID-19 in late August
were fully vaccinated. DOD did not explain how many of the
remainder were partially vaccinated.
Critics suggest that the shocking and predictable rise in
COVID death following vaccination is evidence of long feared pathogenic priming. Officials have offered no other
compelling explanation as to why the vaccine consistently
precipitates disproportionate injuries and deaths among
the jabbed. It is not my intention to resolve this mystery
here. Rather, I’m sharing the preceding graphs because thedata trends they illustrate clash dramatically with official
narratives. For that reason, you will not see reports about
this alarming phenomenon on mainstream media. The
Johns Hopkins University Coronavirus Resource Center
collated the data for these graphs. Johns Hopkins is a
central support column of mainstream medicine, and an
aggressive promoter of COVID vaccines in particular. Johns
Hopkins has received tens of millions of dollars from the
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and over a billion dollars
from Tony Fauci’s NIAID and NIH.59,60 The Johns Hopkins
data, nevertheless, clearly demonstrate that COVID deaths
typically spike sharply in many country after country
immediately after mass vaccination. The South African
physicians group PANDA has assembled the Johns Hopkins
data for every nation in an easy-to-view video.
61 PANDA’s
graphs illustrate this frightening “dead zone” that
immediately followed vaccination drives in most of the
world’s nations.
In the US, COVID Vaccines Caused
Record Deaths
Despite CDC’s efforts to hide the carnage in the US, even
the dysfunctional VAERS system has recorded
unprecedented waves of documented deaths following
COVID vaccines.
In 1976, US regulators pulled the swine flu vaccine after
it was linked to 25 deaths.62 In contrast, between
December 14, 2020 and October 1, 2021, American doctors
and bereaved families have reported more than 16,000
deaths and a total of 778,685 injuries to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) following COVID
vaccination.63,64 The Europeans’ surveillance sites tallied
40,000 deaths and 2.2 million adverse reactions. Due to
chronic undercounting by VAERS and its European sister
system, those numbers are almost certainly only a fraction
of the true injuries. To illustrate how unprecedented this
harm and death is, look at this “hockey stick” effect in
CDC’s own graph of the 30-year history of deaths reported
to VAERS from all vaccines.
Health workers have administered many billions of
vaccines during the past thirty-two years, yet in just eight
months, the COVID vaccines have injured and killed far
more Americans than all other vaccines combined over
three decades. VAERS data show the huge spikes—69.84
percent 65—of deaths occurring during the two weeks after
vaccination, 39.48 percent within 24 hours of the
injections.66 According to CDC’s fatality data, a COVID
vaccine is 98 times more likely to kill than a flu vaccine.67
Other databases have, not surprisingly, yielded much
higher projections of COVID vaccine deaths than VAERS.
A recent peer-reviewed study in the high-gravitas
Elsevier journal Toxicology Reports found that COVID-19
vaccines kill more people in each age group than they save.
According to that study the “best-case scenario” is five
times the number of deaths attributable to each vaccination
vs. those attributable to COVID-19 in the most vulnerable
65+ demographic.68
Similarly, a September 2021 analysis by a team of
prominent scientists and mathematicians convened by
Silicon Valley entrepreneur Steve Kirsch—of half a dozen
population and surveillance system databases, including
VAERS—using eight different independent methods,
attributes 150,000 deaths to COVID vaccines in the United States since January 2020. Kirsch has offered a million dollar reward for anyone who finds an error in this
calculation.69,70 Kirsch’s study which found that the
vaccines kill more people than they save in every age range
was consistent with Pfizer’s six-month clinical trial finding
that people who took the vaccine were more likely to die
than people who didn’t take the vaccine (there were a total
of twenty deaths in the people who took the vaccine vs.
fourteen deaths in the people who didn’t take the
vaccine).71
In yet another effort to calculate excess deaths from
vaccinations from a non-VAERS database, Ohio-based
Attorney Thomas Renz used the Medicare database
(Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) to calculate
that there have been 48,465 deaths among
Medicare/Medicaid beneficiaries within fourteen days of a
first or second dose of a COVID-19 vaccine.72,73 There are
about 59.4 million Americans covered by Medicare,
representing only 18.1 percent of the population, so these
staggering numbers are roughly comparable to Steve
Kirsch’s population-wide estimate of 150,000.
How CDC Hid The Wave of Vaccine
Deaths
According to Dr. Fauci, the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, the White House, and most mainstream media,
we now have a “pandemic of the unvaccinated,”74 with 95
percent to 99 percent of COVID-related hospitalizations
and deaths being attributed to the unvaccinated. As I
mentioned above, these estimates are the product of systematic deception of the public—and presumably of the
President—by America’s top regulators. So how did CDC go
about fooling President Biden?
One of CDC’s bold deceptions is to hide vaccine
mortalities in US data by counting all people as
“unvaccinated” unless their deaths occur more than two
weeks AFTER the second vaccine.75 (Ironically, CDC
doubles down on this fraud by counting many of these
vaccine deaths as COVID deaths.) In this way, CDC
captures that wave of deaths that occurs after vaccination
and attributes them all to “unvaccinated.” This is only one
of many statistical chicaneries that the CDC employs to
hide vaccine injuries and to stoke public fears of COVID.
The CDC utilized an even brassier canard to support
President Joe Biden’s claim that 98 percent of vaccine
hospitalizations and deaths were among the unvaccinated.
In an August 5 video statement, CDC director Dr. Rochelle
Walensky inadvertently revealed the agency’s principal
gimmick for fabricating that statistic. Walensky sheepishly
admitted that CDC included hospitalization and mortality
data from January through June 2021 in its calculation.76
The vast majority of the US population were, of course,
unvaccinated during that time frame, so it makes sense
that almost all hospitalizations would therefore be only
among the unvaccinated. This is simply because there were
almost no vaccinated Americans during that time period!
By January 1, only 0.4 percent of the US population had
received a COVID shot.77 By mid-April, an estimated 37
percent had received one or more shots 78 and as of June
15, only 43.34 percent were fully “vaccinated.”79 Using these data was therefore pretty blatant fraud. Of course,
CDC never let on that it was foisting eight-month-old data
on Americans, allowing us instead to believe that these
were current hospitalization rates as of August. To
compound this flimflam, CDC perpetuated an even more
audacious hustle. CDC omitted the current (as of August)
data related to hospitalizations from the Delta variant,
which disproportionately hospitalized vaccinated
individuals in those other countries for which we have more
reliable data.
CDC’s promotion of this statistical bunko was obviously
grossly misleading. Assuming President Biden wasn’t
deliberately lying to the American people, it’s clear that
CDC was lying to President Biden and using him to dupe
the rest of us.[That's a HUGE assumption Kennedy!!! d.c ]
COVID Vaccines—Other Injuries
Despite the obstacles to reporting, VAERS recorded nearly
800,000 injuries by the 9½ months between December 14,
2020 and October 2021, with 112,000 classified as
“serious.” Pfizer either did not report several severe
injuries—short of death—or deceptively deemphasized their
severity, during clinical trials, including neurological harm,
thrombocytopenia, blood clots, strokes, embolisms,
aneurysms, myocarditis, Bell’s palsy, Guillain-Barré
syndrome, multi-organ failure, amputation, blindness,
paralysis, tinnitus, and menstrual harms. More than 30,000
women in the UK 80 and 6,000 in the US have complained of
the latter.
81
On September 28, a scientific journal, JAMA Neurology,
reported a new series of cases of cerebral venous sinus
thrombosis (CVST) linked to COVID-19 vaccines,82
confirming the severity of the reaction and the associated
high mortality rate, and another journal confirmed the
resumption of hepatitis C in a patient related to the jab.83
The numbers of and diversity of these serious injuries
probably continue to be dramatically underreported. Steve
Kirsch has investigated several broad deceptions Pfizer
used to conceal injuries to the vaccine group during its
clinical trial. We know, for example, due to the courage of
Maddie and her parents, that Maddie de Garay, a 14-year old who participated in the Pfizer trial, suffered severe
neurological injuries including seizures and permanent
paralysis. However, Pfizer reported only that Maddie
suffered a stomach ache.
The Pfizer vaccine only gained emergency authorization
for use in children because Pfizer manipulated trial data
and committed serious offences, like hiding Maddie de
Garay’s injury.
Given that Maddie was only one of 2,300 teenagers in
Pfizer’s trial, her injury was potentially very significant. By
extrapolating a one in 2,300 injury rate to the 86 million
teens who Pfizer and Dr. Fauci have targeted for
vaccination, some 36,000 of these potentially debilitating
injuries could be expected to develop nationwide. While
COVID may kill old people,84 the vaccine, in Maddie’s case,
shows it also kills and harms the young.
Pfizer’s clinical data predicted potentially fatal
myocarditis in one in every 318 teens. Post-marketing data confirm astronomically high rates of myocarditis injuries.
On October 1, 2021, a team of medical researchers and
statisticians found that myocarditis rates reported in
VAERS were significantly higher in teens than Pfizer had
reported in its clinical data.
According to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting
System, there have been 7,537 cases of myocarditis and
pericarditis reported following COVID vaccines,85 with
5,602 cases attributed to Pfizer.
86 Some 476 of these
reports occurred in children from 12 to 17 years old.87
According to an article in Current Trends in Cardiology,
“Within eight weeks of the public offering of COVID-19
products to the 12–15-year-old age group, we found 19
times the expected number of myocarditis cases in the
vaccination volunteers over background myocarditis rates
for this age group.”88 But even these alarming numbers
may underreport myocarditis injuries. Israeli data and US
data presented to CDC’s advisory committee on June 23,
2021 similarly found the rate of reported cases of
myocarditis in vaccinated teenage boys aged 12–17 is at
least twenty-five times greater than expected, and is fifty
times greater than the reported rate in vaccinated males
over 65.
These astonishing numbers mean myocarditis is far from
a “rare” side effect, as Dr. Fauci and Pfizer like to claim.
Nor is it harmless. A recent study suggests that myocarditis
is associated with a 50 percent mortality within five
years.89 A teen had effectively zero risk of dying from
COVID and a substantial risk of death from vaccination.
In October 2021, Sweden, Denmark, and Finland
announced that they will pause the use of Moderna’s
COVID vaccine for children under 18 years of age, after
increased reports of inflammatory diseases like myocarditis
and pericarditis.90,91 That same week, Iceland banned
Moderna’s jab outright due to heart inflammation risk.
Furthermore, the VAERS data may also be dramatically
underreporting myocarditis and other injuries.
Just before I published this book, in late October 2021,
FDA made an extraordinary admission in a letter to Pfizer 92
to explain the chronic underreporting of serious but
common vaccine-induced injuries and deaths. FDA, at last,
admitted that VAERS is worthless for detecting vaccine
injuries.
We have determined that an analysis of spontaneous postmarketing
adverse events [VAERS reports] reported under section 505(k)(1) of
the FDCA [Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act] will not be
sufficient to assess known serious risks of myocarditis and
pericarditis and identify an unexpected serious risk of subclinical
myocarditis. Furthermore, the pharmacovigilance system that
FDA is required to maintain under section 505(k)(3) of the
FDCA is not sufficient to assess these serious risks.
At best, this letter is a shocking acknowledgement that
regulators have no way to assess whether their vaccines
are killing and injuring more humans than they are helping.
In any rational regulatory environment, FDA’s alarming
admission would demand an instantaneous cessation of the
vaccine rollout.
Only Dr. Anthony Fauci can answer the question, “Why—
given FDA’s stunning confession that America has no
functional surveillance system—did HHS not immediately stop the COVID vaccine rollout?” The answer, of course, is
that Dr. Fauci knows that America’s bought, brain-dead,
and scientifically illiterate media will never force him to
answer this query.
Waning Vaccines
Compounding concerns over FDA’s confession that
Americans have no way to assess the risks from COVID
vaccines is the incontestable proof that COVID vaccine
efficacy drops precipitously almost immediately after
vaccination.
Pfizer and FDA may have opted to end the company’s
clinical trial after six months (the optional plan was a three year trial ending in December 2023), after realizing that
the vaccine was causing significant harms and that its fastwaning efficacy would make a cost/benefit analysis
unsupportable if the study continued. In other words, the
injury axis almost immediately crosses the benefits axis.
An October 3, 2021 study in the peer-reviewed journal
BioRxiv by Stanford and Emory University scientists
suggests that antibody levels generated by the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine can suffer a ten-fold decrease seven
months after the second vaccination.93 The scientists warn
that the precipitous drop in antibody levels will
compromise the body’s ability to defend itself against
COVID-19 if the individual is exposed to COVID.
A second study published the same week confirms that
the immune protection offered by two doses of Pfizer’s
COVID-19 vaccine drops off after only two months!94
Another government-funded study in October confirms
the decline in vaccine effectiveness in England 95 finding
that the reduction in transmission “declined over time since
second vaccination, for Delta reaching similar levels to
unvaccinated individuals by 12 weeks for [the AstraZeneca
vaccine] and attenuating substantially for [Pfizer].” In other
words, within just three months, AstraZeneca did nothing
to prevent transmission, and Pfizer was scarcely better.
96
The study appearing in The Lancet confirms that vaccine
effectiveness against infection disappears so fast that it is
ephemeral. The heavily powered study involved 3,436,957
Kaiser Permanente Southern California customers and
compared infections and COVID-19-related hospital
admissions of fully vaccinated to unvaccinated people over
the age of twelve for up to six months.97
The researchers found that vaccine effectiveness against
infection plummeted from 88 percent during the first
month after double vaccination to 47 percent after five
months. The researchers found vaccine effectiveness
against Delta infection was 93 percent during the first
month after double vaccination but dropped to 53 percent
after four months.98
This information should sicken every doctor who has
ever given one of these jabs to a trusting patient. It means
that these products confer no benefits to individuals or
society and their long-term costs are foreboding and
largely unknown. How could this have happened?
Vaccinating Children is Unethical
Our collective nausea can only amplify when we ask, “Why
are we vaccinating children?” Kirsch’s model estimates
that 600 children have already died from COVID vaccines
as of September 2021. A recent Lancet study shows that a
healthy child has zero risk for COVID, suggesting that most
of these kids are dying unnecessarily.
99 Some 86 percent of
children suffered an adverse reaction to the Pfizer COVID
vaccine in clinical trial. And one in nine children suffered a
serious reaction grave enough to leave them unable to
perform daily activities. How can we then justify forcing a
healthy child to take a vaccine that is dead certain to injure
many and kill some while bestowing no benefits? “How can
anyone consider it ethical,” asks Kirsch, “to put a child at
risk, for the pretext that it might shield an adult? Show me
any adult who thinks this is okay, and I’ll show you a
monster!”
COVID-19 vaccines have caused cardiac arrest,
blindness, and paralysis in American children. British
Health Service reports emergency calls for cardiac arrest
are at an all-time high since the government began offering
teens the COVID-19 vaccine. COVID vaccines do not
protect children from hospitalization or death associated
with COVID-19 because healthy children are not being
hospitalized or dying with COVID-19 [NHS statistics].
Children will not gain anything from having the jab because
the vaccines do not prevent infection or transmission, as in
three recent studies published by the CDC, UK government, and Oxford University. There is no evidence
that the vaccines have prevented a single child’s death.
Troubling statistics from Britain’s Office for National
Statistics (ONS) verify the expected: deaths among
teenagers during the summer of 2021 increased
significantly over the previous year, coinciding with the
vaccine rollout. According to an analysis by The Exposé’s
Will Jones,100 between weeks 23 and 37 in 2021—
simultaneous with the vaccine rollout—there were 252
deaths among 15- to 19-year-olds in England and Wales,
compared to 162 in the same period in 2020, an increase of
ninety, or 56 percent—a very high number that deserves
some kind of explanation.
Importantly, there is no similar rise among younger
children aged one to fourteen, a cohort that was not
vaccinated. Instead, 2020 was a low-mortality year for this
age group. COVID cannot be blamed for the sudden rise in
deaths among 15- to 19-year-olds in summer 2021, as the
Office of National Statistics (ONS) data shows that over the
period, there were only nine deaths with COVID in that age
group. This real-world evidence suggests that over the
summer, the vaccines killed nine times as many 15- to 19-
year-olds as COVID did—eighty-one versus nine. “If not,”
asks Jones, “what are the other possible explanations, and
how likely are they?”
Teen deaths among 15- to 19-year-olds have increased
by 47 percent in the UK since they started getting the
COVID-19 vaccine, according to official ONS data.101
Since the vaccine almost certainly causes more teen
deaths and injuries than COVID-19, vaccinating this age
group 102 is highly unethical, and any physician who
inoculates a healthy child is committing serious medical
malpractice.
Nevertheless, Anthony Fauci is urging that kids will be
vaccinated in schools without parental consent, despite a
mountain of evidence that the COVID-19 vaccines are
killing American children and bestow on them no benefit.
Media Censors Reports of Vaccine
Deaths
Most Americans are unaware of all this carnage because
the mainstream and social media companies immediately
scrub injuries reported by doctors, victims, and families.
Media outlets like CNN and the New York Times ignore the
tsunami of vaccine injuries and deaths while reflexively
inflating those deaths they can blame on COVID. As part of
a broad propaganda agenda, they report—with seeming
glee—the occasional COVID death among the unvaccinated.
Illustratively, on September 10, 2021, an ABC affiliate in
Detroit solicited stories on its Facebook page about
unvaccinated people who had died from COVID. Instead,
the network got something they did not want: more than
230,000 messages containing heartbreaking stories of
injuries and deaths from vaccines. None of these
communications were reporting deaths among the
unvaccinated. Readers shared the post over two hundred
thousand times in ten days.103
Vaccinated Are Equally Likely to
Spread COVID
Dr. Fauci’s official theology makes “unvaccinated”
America’s national scapegoat, holding that they are more
likely to spread disease and therefore should not be
allowed to participate in civic life. The data across multiple
sources and studies depict a very different reality.
In July 2021, the CDC found that fully vaccinated
individuals who contract the infection have as high a viral
load in their nasal passages as unvaccinated individuals
who get infected. This means the vaccinated are just as
infectious as the unvaccinated.
Another study from Indonesia supported this
observation, noting that vaccinated individuals carry 251x
the viral loads of Delta and other mutant variants than they
did in the pre-vaccine era. Simply put, as Dr. Peter
McCullough observed, “each vaccinated person is now a
kind of Typhoid Mary for COVID, spreading concentrated
viral loads of vaccine resistant mutants to vaccinated and
unvaccinated alike.”104 CDC acknowledges that vaccinated
individuals carry at least as many COVID germs in their
noses as the unvaccinated.105 CDC cited this revelation to
justify its August 2021 mask mandate.106
An October 2021 investigation by Israel’s medical
authorities of a COVID-19 outbreak in a highly vaccinated
population of health workers at the Meir Medical Center in
Sheba recorded 23.3 percent of patients and 10.3 percent
of staff infected, despite a 96.2 percent vaccination rate
among exposed individuals.107 Moreover, the researchers
recorded multiple transmissions between two fully
vaccinated individuals, both wearing surgical masks, and in
one instance using full PPE, including N-95 mask, face
shield, gown, and gloves.108
next-306
PHARMA PROFITS OVER PUBLIC HEALTH
source
FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. As a journalist, I am making such material available in my efforts to advance understanding of artistic, cultural, historic, religious and political issues. I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Copyrighted material can be removed on the request of the owner.
1 comment:
The Unvaccinated Will Inherent The Earth
Post a Comment