Part 8 Eaters of Children : The Pedocracy Exposed ... “A Gross Breach Of Trust...”

Eaters of Children :  

The Pedocracy Exposed

by Giovanni Augustino “Johnny” Cirucci

Chapter 11 

“A Gross Breach Of Trust...” 

1978: Tony Walsh is ordained a Roman Catholic priest and begins his “ministry” in the west Dublin parish of Ballyfermot, Ireland — a location already stalked by pedophiles like radio personality Eamon Cooke and priests William Carney and Francis McCarthy. Before even graduating seminary, Walsh was accused of sexually abusing an 8 year old boy. 

The serial criminal predations of the powerful pedophiles in Dublin were so egregious that citizen outrage forced the formation of a government “commission”. 

It was chaired by a woman, Yvonne Murphy — a Circuit Court judge from 1998 to 2010. 

Barely more forthright than historical examples like the Warren Commission or the 9/11 Commission, the Murphy Commission’s agenda was essentially the same: acknowledge some facts that have been duly hidden by compatriots in the media while continuing to screen for the source of the crimes at the top. 

Like the previous examples, few would bother to read the Murphy Commission Report (published in 2009). 

Even so, the exploits of Father Tony Murphy, “the singing priest”, were so extreme that, at first his identity was protected under the pseudonym “Fr. Jovito”. However, the section (Chapter 19) was ultimately redacted entirely, along with the next (Chapter 20) dealing with the criminal predations of Father Patrick Joseph McCabe (rather clumsily, to boot). [li] 

The material was eventually released but if few read the original Murphy Report, even fewer read the missing chapters 5 years afterward. 

The most shocking aspect of Murphy Chapter 19 is the extent to which Church leadership, secular authorities and even the Catholic parents of the victims enabled Walsh’s heinous acts. 

As a result, we will examine them in detail but rest assured, the same chain of events has occurred every time a predator came to light. 

19.1 In 1995 Archbishop [Desmond] Connell [Archbishop of Dublin and Primate of Ireland] wrote that Fr. Walsh “is a confirmed paedophile. He was ordained in 1978, but even before his ordination – as it subsequently appeared – he was engaged in paedophiliac activities with minors”. 

19.2 Fr. Walsh is probably the most notorious child sexual abuser to have come to the attention of the Commission. The Commission is aware of more than 40 named people who have complained of child sexual abuse by him. He has admitted to abusing many others... 

Apparently recruited into his position of pedophile predator priest, Walsh was immediately plugged in. 

19.3 Fr. Walsh was born in 1954. He was ordained in 1978. The earliest allegations against him predate his ordination. He himself has admitted that he abused before he was ordained but most of the complaints about his activities prior to 1978 did not surface until many years later. It is known that during his time as a seminarian he had a key to the house of another well known [sic] abuser, Fr. Noel Reynolds (see Chapter 35), and it is alleged that some of the abuse took place in that house. While he was in Clonliffe College, he organised visits by groups of altar boys to Clonliffe and it is alleged that he abused some of them on the seminary premises. 

A cabal of pedophile priests preyed upon the children of Ballyfermot like a pack of hyenas in the midst of a flock of lambs. 

They were organized and systematic. 

During his final years at Clonliffe College, Fr. Bill Carney and his friend Fr. Francis McCarthy visited children’s homes around Dublin, offering to help the boys and girls with their school work and taking them out on day trips that later became overnight trips and holidays. 

They started an altar boy circle at Clonliffe College. When Carney and McCarthy were ordained in 1974, Tony Walsh, who was still a seminarian, took charge of the altar boys, leading the trips to Clonliffe College. 

Carney was posted to Ballyfermot Vocational School, and his friend McCarthy to Dunlavin in Co Wicklow. Carney used to visit McCarthy at weekends in Dunlavin, according to the Murphy Report. Victims later told the Murphy team that they were abused by both McCarthy and Carney. ~ Sunday Independent [465] 

What further enabled Walsh and continues to help the pedophile priesthood is the criminal collusion of indoctrinated Roman Catholic parents. Astoundingly, their loyalty to the Roman Beast feeding on their own children outweighed any instincts or compassion they felt for their offspring. 

First complaint, 1978 

19.5 Fr. Walsh’s first appointment was to Ballyfermot parish in July 1978. Two days after his appointment a complaint was received at Archbishop’s House that he had sexually abused an eight-year-old boy. The abuse was alleged to have taken place within the previous month at the house of the aforementioned Fr. Noel Reynolds. The parents of the boy concerned informed a priest about the alleged abuse. He in turn spoke to Archbishop Ryan’s secretary. A note on the file to the Archbishop in July 1978 refers to a “homosexual incident involving a young lad … and a newly ordained Dublin diocesan priest”. The Archbishop asked a vicar general, Monsignor Glennon, to investigate the matter. 

19.6 It was noted by the priest to whom the complaint was made that “the parents are most responsible people and there is no danger of publicity”. The Archdiocese made no response to the boy’s parents nor, indeed, to the priest to whom the complaint was made. 

This kept everything “in-house” and allowed Walsh’s superiors to keep him active. 

When Walsh was finally examined by a court of law, first in 1995, and again in 2010, details of his enabling by Catholic parents shocked juries. 

The court heard that when one boy told his parents about the abuse, they viciously beat him. “How can you say that about a man of God, a man of the cloth?” they asked him before sending him back down to Walsh who again molested him. ~ Irish Times [466] 

The process was (still is) both highly codified and yet as ancient as the Roman Empire. 

19.7 Fr. Walsh was interviewed by Monsignor Glennon. In his note of this meeting, Monsignor Glennon described the alleged abuse as involving: “osculae, amplexus and tactus immodesti”. This translates as kisses, embraces and shameless touching. 

19.8 Fr. Walsh categorically denied any abuse and stated that the boy concerned had been merely sitting on his knee. The vicar general noted that “Fr. [Walsh] impressed me as telling the truth.” Nothing further was done. 

Walsh went immediately back to work and, again, the next victim’s parent brought her concerns back to the very Machine responsible for the predation, rather than to the secular authorities to conduct a criminal investigation. 

Next complaint, 1979 

19.9 The next complaint was made by the mother of a 14-year-old boy who alleged that he was abused by Fr. Walsh in Ballyfermot in 1978 and 1979. The boy and his parents lived on the north side of Dublin. The abuse ended when he told his mother. She promptly went to her parish priest who told her that he would contact Archbishop’s House about the matter. After some time had elapsed and no further word had been received, the boy’s mother contacted the parish priest of Ballyfermot, Canon Val Rogers, seeking some action. The only action taken was that Fr. Michael Cleary, who was also based in Ballyfermot at the time, was sent to the boy’s house some time [sic] in early 1980 in order to educate him on issues of male sexuality. The mother told the 253Commission that Fr. Cleary did apologise. There are no records available of any communication between the boy’s family and the Archdiocese around this time. In 1985, Canon Rogers told Monsignor [Alexander] Stenson that matters were “hushed up” at the time of the mother’s complaint. 

Certainly, when a trusted cleric exploits his position to prey upon an innocent child, an “apology” usually serves the cause of justice to all concerned. 

Sadly, secular authorities were little help when they were involved. 

Playing the game, Walsh’s superior (Monsignor Alexander Stenson) sent the serial predator for “counseling”. 

Treatment 

19.19 Monsignor Stenson recommended that Fr. Walsh approach a psychiatrist with a view to addressing “his problem”. Fr. Walsh attended the psychiatrist on two occasions. In June 1985, the psychiatrist told Monsignor Stenson that Fr. Walsh was amenable to treatment and that there were three treatment alternatives: medication, electric shock therapy and what was referred to as the “re-orientation method to channel the drive appropriately”. Fr. Walsh had elected for the third option as the “lesser of the evils”. The psychiatrist was “‘cautiously optimistic’ that this could be successful given the fact that Fr. [Walsh] had not the normal sexual outlets available to him in virtue of his priesthood”. 

Actually, the reverse is the stark truth. 

Like alcoholics, a pedophile can never be fully “healed” but unlike alcoholics they are a danger to children around them rather to themselves. 

Most of us cannot think of a greater sin than hurting a child and when the offense is a sex crime, well, we often feel even greater anger, if that’s possible, against the perpetrator. It is terrifying to learn, then, that treatment programs do not rehabilitate sexual offenders before they are released from prison. So says Dr. David K. Ho, consultant forensic psychiatrist, clinical research lead, South Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, in his new opinion piece appearing in the British Medical Journal. 

“People should know that the treatments offenders receive in prisons and secure hospitals lack evidence of efficacy,” Ho states. 

Are we ready to heed his warning? While Ho, whose credentials suggest he certainly knows his subject matter, speaks convincingly... ~ Medical Daily [467] 

Even more surprising is Dr. Ho’s admonition that lust to defile children sexually is related to other “non-traditional” sexual desires. 

Typically, we think of sex crimes as including rape, child sex abuse, sexual assault, female genital mutilation, incest, and the, in most people’s minds, lesser crimes of exhibitionism and prostitution. Yet, sexual offending, says Ho, “consists of a heterogeneous group of acts, which may not include but are likely to include at least some elements of paraphilia,” defined as mental disorders of sexual preference, such as pedophilia, voyeurism, fetishism, exhibitionism, frotteurism (rubbing up against a non-consenting person), sadomasochism, sexual sadism, sexual masochism, and disorders not otherwise specified. [468] 

Although no authority would dare question the correlation between homosexuality and pedophilia the evidence is there (and we will examine it shortly). 

The system remained tidy and self-contained thanks to Catholic parents who brought their chicks back to the foxes. 

Further complaint, October 1985 

19.20 In October 1985, a parent complained to Fr. [Donal] O’Doherty, the parish priest in Ballyfermot, that Fr. Walsh had indecently assaulted a young girl. Fr. O’Doherty reported this to Bishop O’Mahony who, in turn, told Monsignor Stenson. The psychiatrist was informed. Fr. Walsh denied this allegation. 

19.21 No further inquiries were made. There is no evidence that any new treatment was considered. ... 

In many municipalities it is now illegal for any medical professional to deal with a known pedophile and not report the matter to law enforcement ... not that such a report would bring results. 

The unsuspecting Murphy investigator seemed flabbergasted that Walsh could then be promoted with congratulations from Dublin Archbishop Dermot J. Ryan. 

19.21 ... Fr. Walsh was removed from Ballyfermot and appointed to Westland Row. The Archbishop’s letter appointing him states: “I take this opportunity to thank you for your dedicated work in Ballyfermot”. While this is the standard formula in such appointments, it is, nevertheless, astonishing that it could be used in the light of Fr. Walsh’s history in Ballyfermot. Since he left Ballyfermot in 1985, numerous complainants have come forward alleging abuse by Fr. Walsh while he was there. 

The Murphy investigator continues to appear unaware that Walsh’s promotion was a determined effort by his superiors to keep him active and amongst a flock that had little idea he was a wolf in a priest’s collar. 

19.24 At this stage, the Archdiocese was aware of four specific complaints and a number of concerns. [lii] Fr. Walsh had admitted to the abuse of three children. It is difficult to understand how the seriousness of his situation was not fully appreciated. It is also difficult to conclude that the move was for any purpose other than to avoid further scandal in Ballyfermot. Fr. Walsh was removed from a parish in which the parish priest was aware of his activities 257 and was endeavouring to restrain him to a parish in which, it would appear, the parish priest had no awareness of his proclivities. 

The continued collaboration by Roman Catholic parents with the very Leviathan that preyed upon their children insured Walsh’s free reign — even when he left a trail of traumatized children in his wake. 

19.25 Meanwhile, the mother of the 1979 complainant was in touch with Monsignor Stenson because of her son’s continuing difficulties. She was being assisted by a priest who was a member of a religious order. This priest was clearly angry at the way the matter was being handled and he upbraided the Archbishop for unsatisfactory responses to the mother’s letters and said: “I think that [the mother] may be forgiven if she regards this letter as an attempt to sweep the matter under a carpet”. He went on to say: “Scandal has been given and serious harm done to a young boy by a priest of the Archdiocese. If it is neither feasible nor desirable that this unfortunate priest himself personally try to undo the damage he has done, is it not your duty as his Superior to do so…”. 

19.26 Monsignor Stenson met the mother who wanted help for her son and wanted to ensure that Fr. Walsh did not carry on his singing activities around her area. Monsignor Stenson noted: “I was impressed by this woman who is obviously a concerned person and who is distressed by what has happened to her son [...]. 

The fact that these parents were finally able to locate a sympathetic priestly ear does not abrogate them from responsibility to being accomplices in the abuse of their own children. 

The fact that nothing came from the “angry” priest’s letters further validates that said parents are criminally negligible. 

An entertainment cover was created for the pedophile priests, like enemy agents in a foreign nation (which is exactly what they were). 

Over the years, Fr. Michael Cleary seemed to watch out for Walsh. Cleary was then a charismatic, celebrity priest who was the “warm up” act for Pope John Paul’s historic mass on his visit to Ireland in 1979. 

Like Cleary, Walsh was a singer too. He was in a group of singing priests who toured an act called the ‘Holy Show’ in which he did Elvis impersonations. 

Fr. Cleary had secrets of his own — long relationship with his housekeeper with whom he fathered two sons. ~ Independent [469] 

Walsh left copious amounts of evidence that he was an arch criminal and sexual deviant who even went as far as sedating his victims with intravenous narcotics. 

1987 

19.28 In January 1987, the housekeeper to the administrator in Westland Row alleged that she found items of her clothing in Fr. Walsh’s room. This included underwear which, she alleged, had been “used”. She had to burn the clothing. She also found condoms and syringes in his room. She further mentioned that a number of boys had slept overnight in his bed and a boy from Balllyfermot had been visiting. Monsignor Stenson noted that he had “no doubt about her truthfulness”. 

The mind boggles at the unending stream of Catholic parents willing to allow their children to be violated by trusted clergy. 

19.32 Monsignor Stenson met the parents who had made the most recent complaint. He noted: “[The father] said that he would not like [J] [liii] to suffer because of one misdemeanour. They pray for him and hope he can get help. I was greatly impressed by this couple. They were extremely kind and concerned. I did not indicate that there was a history of this behaviour”. 

A decade after the first reports of his criminal activities came to the attention of his superiors, they finally acted...sending him to therapy. 

But by now, even his therapist was showing deep concern. 

19.34 In May 1988, ten years after the first complaint was made to the Archdiocese, the Archbishop and the auxiliary bishops decided to send Fr. Walsh to Stroud [a mental health facility in Gloucestershire, England] for treatment. He was removed from his position in Westland Row in June 1988. 

Stroud, 1988 

19.35 Monsignor Stenson provided Stroud with a brief history of the incidents he had investigated together with a copy of Fr. Walsh’s statement. 260 Shortly after Fr. Walsh’s arrival in Stroud, his therapist there reported to Monsignor Stenson that Fr. Walsh appeared to be more realistic about his situation than other similar men. A month later, Monsignor Stenson noted the following comments made by a psychologist from Stroud: “[J] [liv] is ‘extremely compulsive – there have been an awful lot of children involved he is a very disturbed man he is always going to be dangerous. He could not be let near schools, children, Confession without a grille etc…’”. 

Note that the therapist made the report — not to law enforcement — but to Church officials. 

19.36 In its final report in November 1988, Stroud said that ... under no circumstances should he [Walsh] have any apostolate involving children. 

This was a secular British medical facility turning a clear threat to children back to his religious hierarchy. That hierarchy did exactly what they have before and since — put the monster back into circulation. 

Not only did Walsh’s behavior show him to be a malignant serial predator, he was also clearly a satanist who looked to cause physical, emotional and spiritual harm from his position as a trusted religious representative. 

On one occasion he sodomized a young boy with a crucifix. [470] 

After his “therapy” at Stroud, he resumed his activities. 

19.43 In the meantime, Fr. Walsh started to resume his old behaviour. Parents complained to Monsignor Stenson that, at a fete [“festival”] at All Hallows [College] in August 1989, Fr. Walsh brought their son to his car, sat him on his lap and “kissed him...” 

Almost as astounding as the parents who enabled the pedophile to prey upon their children, are the number of secular medical professionals who never thought to report to anyone other than a Roman Catholic authority. That was despite their findings that Walsh was an extremely dangerous individual in a key position of trust that gave him access to countless unsuspecting families. 

19.48 Further medical reports were received, in December 1989 and January 1990, from the psychiatrist who had treated him in 1985 and from the psychotherapist he had been attending since early 1989. The psychiatrist’s report was described by Monsignor Stenson as “anything but encouraging”. The psychiatrist considered that Fr. Walsh had made no real progress over the four years 1985 – 1989. 

Although there was talk of “laicization” (defrocking Walsh), no moves were made to restrict him in any way. 

In fact, he was allowed to return to where his crimes first began to again prey upon the children of that same parish! 

When a concerned parent realized what had happened, she did what she thought she was supposed to...and complained to the Archdiocese. 

19.57 In March 1991, a scout leader and a parent contacted the Archdiocese to report that Fr. Walsh was back in Dublin. [lv] Fr. Walsh had been seen with a boy in his car and was calling frequently to this boy’s house. 

Still, the appearance of action had to be kept up. 

19.59 At a bishops’ meeting in March 1991 it was decided to institute a penal process against Fr. Walsh. The bishops also discussed informing the Gardai but did not do so. 

The Garda Síochána (“Guardians of the Peace”) or Gardaí are the national police of Ireland; the Irish equivalent of the FBI. 

In both cases the institutions are far more complicit in committing crimes rather than solving them. 

In relation to Father Tony Walsh, the Gardaí were his “secular” law enforcement enablers. 

In August of 1991, the first brave parent in 20 years of Walsh’s reign of terror got in touch with law enforcement. 

Sadly, she received the same response if she would’ve called the Archdiocese like the rest. 

19.64 In August 1991, Fr. Walsh had a review meeting with Monsignor Stenson [lvi] where he expressed his dissatisfaction with Mellifont [an Abbey where he received more “counseling”]. He refused to go to the therapeutic centre in the UK stating that he was happy with his current therapist. 

Concerns reported to Gardai 

19.65 Shortly after this meeting, Fr. Walsh approached a young boy in Drumcondra and, having established his name and address, asked him to get into the car. The boy immediately went home and told his mother. The following day he called to the boy’s house. The mother called the Gardai. 

19.66 The garda investigation started in the absence of any specific allegation of child sexual abuse. [lvii] The Gardai contacted Mellifont. A priest in Mellifont told the Gardai that Fr. Walsh was in Mellifont because there were numerous allegations of paedophilia against him and referred them to the Archdiocese. In his report on the matter in 2002, the garda investigating the case stated that, as no crime had been committed, he himself reported the matter (he does not say to whom and there is no record of a report on the garda files) and then circulated Fr. Walsh’s car number and a description of Fr. Walsh as being likely to engage in paedophilia. No attempt was made at that stage to investigate the statement that Fr. Walsh had been sent to Mellifont because of numerous allegations of paedophilia. 

The Gardaí response was lackadaisical and incompetent. Rather than conduct an independent investigation, Gardaí asked the foxes if they’ve been in the hen-house. 

19.67 The Archdiocese took the fact that Fr. Walsh had now come to the attention of the Gardai far more seriously than the Gardai did. Monsignor Stenson noted: “Apparently [a garda] from Whitehall Garda Station had been looking for a Fr. [Walsh] with an address at Mellifont. [Walsh] had approached a child and the mother had complained to the Police. … I rang [the garda] and explained who I was and what I had heard. I asked if he could provide details. He did but wondered if [Walsh] had a record. I evaded that but told him to proceed with whatever steps he thought he should take.” 

As the monster was coddled with counseling, he continued to prey upon children unhindered by cops or clergy. 

19.69 In September 1991, the Archbishop ordered Fr. Walsh to live in St. John of God psychiatric hospital until such time as he was to be transferred to the therapeutic centre in the U.K. On the night before he was due to enter St John of God’s, he attempted to persuade a young boy aged 11, whom he had baptised, into his car. The boy refused. He then followed the boy to his house and attempted to persuade his sister that the boy should go out with him. The family called the Gardai. In an interview with his psychologist the following day Fr. Walsh described the boy as “incredibly good looking”. 

In fact, the Gardaí were even nice enough to tell Walsh’s superiors the coast was clear. A pesky officer trying to do their job was handled proper. 

19.70 A few days later, the garda investigating the concerns expressed in August 1991 rang Monsignor Stenson inquiring about Fr. Walsh’s whereabouts. It seems that gardai from another station had been in touch with him concerning a young boy who had recently been approached by Fr. Walsh outside a shopping centre. Monsignor Stenson told the garda that Fr. Walsh was in St. John of God’s [lviii] and that he had no access to his car. It then emerged that this Garda was aware of an incident involving Fr. Walsh and the most recent complainant which occurred a year earlier. At the time, the garda reported the incident to the boy’s headmaster but did not do anything else. Monsignor Stenson’s note of these contacts with the garda ends: “[the garda] assured me that there was ‘no question of prosecution’...”. 

Embarrassed, the Murphy Report noted this “lapse” in duty. 

19.73 ...for all practical purposes, any garda investigation into Fr. Walsh’s activities ceased at this point even though by now, while there were no specific complaints of child sexual abuse known to the Gardai, they were aware of three incidents of suspicious behaviour. Of course, Monsignor Stenson’s failure to tell the Gardai of the other known allegations against Fr. Walsh meant that they were, as yet, unaware of the bigger problem. [lix] 

Walsh continued to bounce from clinic to clinic rather than from prison to prison. While at an unspecified clinic in the United Kingdom he admitted to defiling over 100 boys. [471] 

The true and final numbers will never be known. 

Said “U.K. clinic” appears to be unspecified by the Murphy Report to cover their criminal enabling of Walsh! 

1992 

19.75 Fr. Walsh returned to the U.K. clinic in January 1992 to begin his intensive course. A remarkable tale then emerged. Apparently the clinic allowed Fr. Walsh to roam the streets of the nearby large city unsupervised. He dressed in clerical attire and introduced himself to local clergy and said mass in local churches. He befriended a family with young children telling them that he was training as a counsellor at the clinic and that if they saw him with other people in the street they should not approach him as you could not be too careful around sex offenders. Fr. Walsh visited their house and paid a lot of attention to their 11-year-old son including sitting him on his lap. He agreed to baby-sit for their children. By chance, the father of the children 270 called to the clinic where the true story emerged. Fr. Walsh was immediately removed from the clinic and returned to Ireland. 

Certainly Walsh must’ve been sorely disappointed that the child’s father wasn’t a more dutiful Catholic. 

Despite Monsignor Stenson alerting the Gardaí to this latest incident, corrective action was left to the foxes and it was as anemic as all previous “actions”. 

19.76 Monsignor Stenson reported Fr. Walsh’s return to the garda sergeant and commented: “In view of Fr. [Walsh’s] behaviour in the past you might give this information whatever attention you think it may require”. 

19.77 In March 1992, the bishops again decided that he was to be instructed not to say mass, not to wear clerical dress and not to exercise any functions of priesthood. He was to engage in a form of occupational therapy and it was decided to inform a number of parish priests of the position. He was also told that he could not use his car. He was given work in the archdiocesan library. 

Truly, the entire lot should be in prison awaiting sentencing; both cops and clergy. 

As his reign of terror began to burden “the Church”, moves were slowly made to defrock him — but nothing more. 

His own psychologist was astounded. 

19.87 Fr. Walsh’s psychologist was not impressed with the decision to dismiss him from the priesthood. He expressed his dissatisfaction to Fr. Aidan McGrath (who was Fr. Walsh’s advocate or procurator during the penal process) in September 1993: “As you know, I favour judgements in the courts which both impose a punishment, but which allow genuine change to lead to escape from that punishment. Good deeds can earn both remission and forgiveness. [Walsh] faces no such prospect, and I wonder why this kind of sentence was excluded”. 

Perhaps if the psychologist had hounded law enforcement, personally, he would’ve been more than simply “astounded”. 

After decades of raping children, as Irish superiors finally began ineffective action against Walsh, Rome intervened to insure even this was circumvented! 

19.89 In October 1993, Fr. Walsh appealed to Rome against the decision to dismiss him. ... In June 1994, the appellate judges in Rome allowed [Walsh] 273 to remain in the clerical state... 

As the years rolled on, Walsh continued to approach children unhindered. 

No venue was sacred. 

Perhaps, more accurately, no venue was “off limits” as Walsh clearly associated Roman Catholicism with worship of Lucifer which he proved by his incessant and heinous behavior. 

During court proceedings in 2010 it was revealed that Walsh frequently used the confessional to rape boys. Even presiding magistrate Frank O’Donnell (a Catholic) was disturbed. 

“It is difficult to imagine more reprehensible circumstances than a priest in confession setting about the sexual abuse of a young boy,” the judge said. “This is a gross breach of trust, and that’s putting it mildly.” ~ Irish Times [472] 

In fact, as a Luciferian, Walsh found perverse pleasure in exploiting what his victims would consider “holy” such as grooming boys during the funeral of a family member (which he did repeatedly). 

Although the Garda was now involved, Ireland’s Finest continued to sit on the sidelines. 

19.90 Meanwhile, a complaint of sexual assault was made to the Gardai. In May 1994, a young boy complained to the Gardai in Ballyfermot that he had been sexually assaulted by Fr. Walsh in the toilet of a pub following the funeral of the boy’s grandfather. The family alleged that a similar incident had happened a year earlier but they did not report it at the time. The Gardai contacted Monsignor Stenson. Fr. Walsh attended the garda station and declined to answer any questions. The Gardai told Monsignor Stenson of their intention to arrest Fr. Walsh. They also told him that they were in the process of “linking of various skeletons” and that press were “sniffing out a story”. Fr. Walsh denied the allegation. 

Notice that the good Catholic family could’ve reported a “similar incident” previously, but didn’t. 

The media got involved. Agents of the Devil’s Simulation there also made sure that Walsh was still protected. 

When one of Walsh’s victims became suicidal, his mother contacted ... well, you know who. 

19.91 In late 1994 there were newspaper reports about this latest incident; these did not name either Fr. Walsh or the boy. In December 1994, a mother of boys who had been abused by Fr. Walsh rang Monsignor Stenson to say that her son was suicidal and that Fr. Walsh had been babysitting in recent weeks. 

This new “media attention” — despite being as anemic as the Garda response — was still attacked by the clergy. 

19.93 In spite of the mounting evidence and in the light of the recent media coverage, Monsignor [Gerard] Sheehy advised Archbishop Connell: “I think it important that every one of us should at this stage avoid any excessive reaction – no matter what the civil law may say. Least of all should we pay any real attention to the money-making posturing of the media”. 

Perhaps it’s not surprising that Sheehy would so aggressively defend a monster like Father Tony Walsh; Sheehy was ordained at the same Holy Cross seminary in Clonliffe. [473] 

Finally, in February of 1995, Walsh was charged with a single assault, convicted and sentenced to a year in prison. [Murphy 19.95] 

Astoundingly, he continued to walk free and the “problem” of where to station him arose for “the Church”. [Murphy 19.98] 

Now that he was a convicted pedophile, the Archdiocese decided it was a good time to give up some of the extensive records of his activities. [Murphy 19.96] 

Walsh was charged with new offenses in July of 1995 but the proceedings were suspended so that the Garda could “collate all the cases.” 

He continued to roam free, even as a convicted pedophile. 

The Garda made no moves that weren’t first coordinated with the Church. 

19.100 In July 1995, Fr. Walsh was charged with further sexual offences in the District Court. The case was adjourned to allow the Gardai pursue further investigations. In November 1995, the Gardai told Monsignor Stenson that all garda stations had been asked to collate all cases they had concerning Fr. Walsh. 

Walsh further thwarted justice by exploiting free legal aid which gave him eight more years of opportunity to rape children. [474] 

Over a year later, the convicted pedophile was finally defrocked, though still roaming free and living at the Mount Melleray Abbey. [Murphy 19.104] 

Sad to see Walsh put out, Pope Saint John Paul II and the Curia awarded the serial child rapist £10,500 in “severance pay”. [19.105] 

As the convictions rolled in, the courts played a judicial game of propaganda; instead of requiring Walsh to serve terms for his offenses consecutively, they were lumped together concurrently. This allowed the government to appear to be hammering the priest with multiple convictions but, in actuality, he would only be required to serve the time for a single one. [19.109] 

One reason Walsh’s “therapists” never turned him over to authorities is because they were paid by his superiors to keep things quiet. 

This conflict of interest continued through the pedophile priest’s trials, much to the anger of his victims. [19.111] 

During the proceedings it surfaced that victims were displeased with relying upon clergy for justice and restitution, although one can’t help but wonder why. 

19.113 ...one complainant told the Commission that he was unhappy with how he was treated and said that “the Church have failed me and still fail me today”.

As Walsh’s concurrent prison time passed quickly, he came up for release. 

It was September of 2001. [19.116] [lx] 

Upon his release, Walsh ignored his laicization and continued on as a Roman Catholic priest! The response of Rome was to “threaten” him with “excommunication” (which never occurred). [19-119] 

As a result of the actions of Ireland’s law enforcement, judges, the Director of Public Prosecutions and Catholic clergy from Dublin to Rome, Tony Walsh continued to rape children as a defrocked priest even after his sickeningly short, concurrent prison term(s). 

19.122 Between 2002 and 2006, over 20 further individuals alleged that they were abused by Walsh. 

In 2010, Walsh was again brought into court and, again, Ireland’s “Justice System” served up injustice. 

It should be noted that the sickening leniency Walsh received was the “harshest” of any pedophile priest. 

Five of the 13 counts, for buggery, attracted sentences of 10, 12, 14, 16 and 16 years each. The remaining counts, for indecent assault, brought sentences ranging from four to nine years. As Walsh is to serve his sentences concurrently, 16 years is the maximum time he will spend in jail. It is the most severe sentence ever imposed on a clerical child sex abuser in the State. (Four years were suspended, as a psychologist’s report said it was unlikely Walsh would offend again.) With good behaviour Walsh could be out of jail in 2019. 

Fr. Brendan Smyth, probably Ireland’s most notorious clerical paedophile, was jailed for 12 years at the Circuit Criminal Court in July 1997. He died a month into his sentence. Another notorious abuser, the Donegal priest Fr. Eugene Greene, was released in 2008 after serving nine years of a 12- year sentence. ~ Irish Times [475] 

What little “justice” was delivered by the agents of the Devil’s Simulation was the result of citizens like one of his victims who hounded authorities for seventeen years seeking for Walsh to be reined in. [476] 

The same scenario played out across decades of abuse but the details of just a few incidents show what satanic sociopaths Tony Walsh, all such pedophiles and all who aid them, are. He repeatedly mixed “sacred” religious paraphernalia in with his crimes (part of the Luciferian ritual?) and was completely unfazed by the pain he caused his child victims. 

In David’s case Walsh did not plead guilty and forced a trial. The jury last month found him guilty, unanimously and after just 94 minutes, on the 13 counts. The speed of the conviction was down to David himself, who, as Justice O’Donnell said on Monday, had been “an absolute stalwart” in his evidence to the court. 

David’s victim-impact statement, prepared by the psychiatrist Prof Ivor Browne, includes the details of three shocking incidents. One took place in “a small tunnel” at the Phoenix Park, “towards the Furry Glen”, where there was “a small cream mattress”. David was raped there by Walsh. The boy “felt severe pain and cried a lot”. 

Afterwards Walsh wiped him with “a purple sash (stole) he had with him”. When Walsh picked up his jacket “a small receptacle for holding Holy Communion wafers fell out of his pocket”. He brought David back to the presbytery, “put on Elvis records ... and gave him a glass of Coke”. He then showed David “a Bible with pictures of hell and said if he told anyone he would burn in hell and never go to heaven and then he let him go home”. ~ Irish Times [477] 

Shockingly, as David attempted to get help from his family, he was assaulted again! 

These were not isolated incidents. As Prof [Ivor] Browne [of the Rape Crisis Centre and the Institute of Psychosocial Medicine in Sandycove, Dublin] said in the victim-impact report, they were described in detail “because they were particularly heinous”. But, he continued, “it should be stressed that over the five years, between the ages of seven and 12, that this abuse continued, David was raped anally and buggered by the priest on average a couple of times a week.” When David told his uncle what Walsh had been doing to him, his uncle also raped him “on a couple of occasions”. [478] 

Were these just unbelievably bad circumstances or evidence of a network of child rapists? 

Although the link in this instance is tenuous, if one considers the possibility that interdimensional agencies (“demons”) were contributing, it becomes more likely. 

Other victims like David continued to step forward and force government officials to act. As a result, Tony Walsh is back in prison and not due for release until 2023. 

Even this can not be considered “justice”. 

Unfortunately for Ireland’s citizenry, the Catholic Church saw to the abolishment of the death penalty in 1964. 

The criminal behavior from Ireland’s religious and “secular” authorities by enabling monsters to prey upon the citizenry they are sworn to protect is why Chapter 19 of the Murphy report was redacted. 

John Charles McQuaid: Ruler of Catholic Ireland 

One man not examined by the Murphy Commission was Archbishop John McQuaid; arguably the most powerful man in Ireland during his tenure. 

The HSE [Health Service Executive, the governmental authority for Ireland’s Catholic-sponsored socialized medicine] has refused to explain why an allegation that one of the most powerful figures in the Catholic Church had abused a minor was not passed to a commission investigating abuse in the Dublin Archdiocese. 

Gardai last night said they were still investigating two complaints made against former Archbishop of Dublin John Charles McQuaid. 

Yesterday it emerged that one of the complaints — made in 2003 — was never reported to the Murphy Commission. 

Dr. McQuaid was archbishop between 1940 and 1972 and was criticised by the commission for his failure to protect children from abusive priests. He died in 1973. 

Yesterday it emerged that the 2003 complaint was not forwarded to the Murphy inquiry until May 2009, just as it was winding down. 

Details of that complaint — and a second made directly to the Dublin Archdiocese — were contained in the supplementary report to the Dublin Archdiocese Investigation by the Murphy Commission. 

The HSE refused to comment on why the allegation had never been investigated. ~The Irish Independent  [479] 

In fact, despite the procedure of the Devil’s Simulation to only promote those who partake in the defiling of children, Roman Catholic Bishops and Cardinals remain untouched by media or law enforcement. 

Yet the likelihood that they are criminals is absolutely assured, if only how they enable the heinous acts of their subordinates. 

But in McQuaid’s case, there is even more. 

Allegations that Dr. McQuaid had abused children first emerged in 1999 in a biography of the cleric by Irish Independent journalist John Cooney. [480] 

The usual procedure in addressing priest predations of waiting until the perpetrator was a retired octogenarian was padded for Doctor McQuaid. The Archbishop’s crimes lay unreported until Cooney’s book John Charles McQuaid: Ruler of Catholic Ireland, was published — almost 40 years after McQuaid’s death. 

Even then, only a smattering of complaints were allowed to be addressed. 

Two specific complaints and a separate unspecified “concern” against an unidentified cleric were reported to the Murphy Commission, a state sponsored investigation into the handling of clerical sexual abuse of children in the Dublin archdiocese. 

The commission published its main report in 2009, but it said that “due to human error” the latest allegations emerged only in a supplementary report published in July. This does not name Archbishop McQuaid, but the [Irish Times disclosed] that the allegations of abuse contained within it refer to the archbishop. One allegation is regarding abuse of a 12-year old boy in 1961. ~ NY Times [481] 

Cooney noted that McQuaid reigned supreme in Ireland and that his “Protestant opposition” was little of either. 

Upon word of his death, top Protestant leaders immediately took up the Catholic (pagan) practice of praying for the dead pedophile’s soul. 

They also dropped their agendas to force the Irish government to give Protestant Christianity equal footing in public affairs. 

The unexpected death ... of Archbishop John Charles McQuaid deflected a group of Protestant churchmen from taking the historic step of sanctioning radical measures to eradicate sectarian bigotry in the North and to promote an inclusive pluralist society in the Republic. ... 

A few minutes later Alan Buchanan, the Church of Ireland Archbishop of Dublin, rushed back into the room and announced in his strong Monaghan accent, “Archbishop McQuaid is dead. Archbishop McQuaid is dead.” Instantly, the Church of Ireland Primate of Armagh, George Otto Simms, the Presbyterian, Jack Weir and the former Methodist President, Eric Gallagher, stood in silent prayer with Buchanan for the soul of John Charles. It was a spontaneous act of spiritual homage from the Protestant leaders to the undisputed champion of Catholic supremacy. 

Observing this remarkable event as The Irish Times religious affairs correspondent, I was puzzled by such a show of reverence. Even in death, McQuaid cast a heavy shadow. On Buchanan’s suggestion, the Protestant church leaders sent a telegram of sympathy to Archbishop Dermot Ryan, who 15 months earlier had succeeded McQuaid. More importantly, they postponed a decision to invite Catholic observers to the Irish Council of Churches. It was as if the ghost of John Charles chuckled at this proof of Protestant indecision. ~ Irish Times [482] 

For a brief period of time, Rome’s death-grip on Ireland’s women and children was challenged by Noël Browne, a Doctor of medicine and Minister in the Dáil Éireann (the lower house of Ireland’s Legislature). 

Because Browne rose against Catholic power, mention of his name and his short-lived efforts to remove Vatican tyranny in hospitals are always addressed with adjectives like “highly controversial”. His legislation was slammed as the “Mother and Child Scheme” which “brought down” entire administrations! 

Because he was “highly controversial”, Browne was frequently kicked out of any political party he tried to affiliate with. 

Despite being “highly controversial” he was immediately elected to Teachta Dála (equivalent of an American Congressman, usually abbreviated “TD”) upon arriving in a new party. 

Noël Christopher Browne (20 December 1915 – 21 May 1997) was an Irish politician and doctor. [1] He holds the distinction of being one of only seven TDs to be appointed Minister at the start of their first term in the Dáil. His controversial Mother and Child Scheme in effect brought down the First Inter-Party Government of John A. Costello in 1951. 

Browne was a well-known but at times highly controversial public representative, and managed to be a TD for five different political parties (two of which he co-founded). These were Clann na Poblachta (resigned), Fianna Fáil (expelled), National Progressive Democrats (co-founder), Labour Party (resigned) and the Socialist Labour Party (co-founder). ~ Wikipedia [483] 

___________ 

The Mother and Child Scheme was a healthcare programme in Ireland that would later become remembered as a major political crisis involving primarily the Irish Government and Roman Catholic Church in the early 1950s. 

The scheme was referred to as the Mother and Child Service in legislation. A brochure, “What the new service means to every family”, was prepared. It explained the new service but was not issued to the public. The scheme was engulfed in crisis before this could happen. ~ Wikipedia [484] 

Not realizing the true nature of the Catholic Church — that it is anything but “Christian” — the few who rise against it wrongly believe that secularism is the preferred tactic when fighting such a Dragon. 

However, it is an anticipated tactic and one that Rome’s enemies are carefully maneuvered in to. Once immersed in the quagmire of no moral authority above “government”, she steps into the vacuum and fully flexes her muscles through her agents both overt and covert. 

The Vatican’s influence in Ireland, particularly when wielded by Archbishop John Charles McQuaid was all-encompassing. 

None of his successors, Dermot Ryan, Kevin McNamara and Desmond Connell, has exercised the enormous spiritual power, let alone the almost unbounded temporal power, which he commanded. 

It was not until the publication in 1987 of the de Valera papers relating to the drafting of [Ireland’s] 1937 Constitution that the extent of McQuaid’s power began to be fully appreciated. 

These papers showed how McQuaid, as president of Blackrock College, collaborated closely with de Valera [lxi] in drafting the fundamental law of the State. 

Even more importantly, the opening of the McQuaid archive a decade later, in 1997, revealed a homespun spy system which had won the admiration of the head of the FBI, the legendary J. Edgar Hoover. 

A control freak, McQuaid mobilised government Departments, Dublin Corporation, and the medical, legal and teaching professions to defend [the Roman Catholic Church from all enemies [lxii] ]. 

In the McQuaid story lies the awesome power exercised by the Catholic Church in Ireland in the mid-twentieth century. ~ Cooney [485] 

According to his biographer, John Cooney, it was Archbishop McQuaid’s mismanagement of Dublin diocese finances — which were on the brink of bankruptcy in the 1970’s — that fostered his two heart attacks. 

The biographer added this fascinating incident which occurred after the highest Roman Catholic prelate in Ireland was undergoing care at St. Columcille’s Hospital in the Dublin suburb of Loughlinstown from his second heart attack: 

Knowing that his end was approaching, he rose up from his pillow and asked a Roscommon nurse if he had any chance of reaching heaven. [486] 

Following the Catholic (and very pagan) practice of literally worshipping upon the dead, McQuaid’s body was given the highest honors. 

McQuaid was buried under the High Altar in Dublin’s Pro-Cathedral... [487]

It is a very un-Christian practice that goes back thousands of years. 

Setting aside a special time and place in which to focus upon one’s relationship with God — “going to church” — is a purely pagan contrivance. 

All cathedrals and most churches are built upon sacred burial sites (dead bodies) because pagans believed that such sites facilitated interdimensional communication through rituals like the “mass”. 

From the earliest times the barrow was regarded as sacred ground, and near it the pagan temple was erected. When we look at our country churches, surrounded by rows of grass-covered mounds, we see a type of the olden practice very little altered, indeed, for the Christian Church was often built on the actual foundations of the pagan temple ... ~ Puckle 59 

Vatican City is a sacred “city of the dead” built upon an ancient Etruscan grave site. ~ Secret History [488] 

Given John McQuaid’s tyrannical power in Ireland it is even more disturbing to learn that his crimes went beyond merely covering for sexual deviant predatory priests. 

The astronomer Frederick O’Connor hand-built a telescope so the Archbishop could view the stars and indulge a scholarly interest in astronomy. 

But according to John Cooney’s new book, John Charles McQuaid Ruler of Catholic Ireland, the Archbishop used his eye in the sky for more prurient pursuits. 

The book alleges he used the powerful lens to spy on courting couples making out on Killiney beach. 

They allege that the Machiavellian churchman who effectively ruled the church not only in Dublin, but in Ireland, for 32 years and impacted on the affairs of State in a most profound way, was also a Peeping Tom in a cassock. ... 

These allegations of voyeurism were used to substantiate far more sinister allegations contained in Cooney’s book and carried last week in the Sunday Times, which claimed the Archbishop was a homosexual who preyed on children. However, another allegation that the Archbishop also used the telescope to spy on schoolgirls at a nearby convent was physically possible and when we visited the turret this week we could see children playing in the school grounds. ~ The Irish Independent [489] 

An important source for Cooney in regards to accusations that McQuaid was a sexual deviant and a pedophile came from none other than Dr. Noël Browne. 

That central allegation of paedophilia, inappropriate behaviour towards children and an unhealthy and unsavoury interest in sex is based in part on a manuscript by the late Noel Browne. [490] 

The source was an unpublished autobiography that included an interview with a school inspector who had direct knowledge of McQuaid’s leanings. 

John Cooney was given a copy of the controversial [work] by Dr. Browne’s widow when he approached her following her husband’s death. 

John Cooney’s book will state that Browne was convinced that the story related by the school inspector pointed towards the Archbishop being a paranoid schizophrenic as well as an abuser. [491] 

These are impeccable sources (mocked by the media) which show that the Bishops, Cardinals and Popes who enable pedophile priests are doing so because they are child predators, themselves. 

That’s how they got “elected”.

next- 304s

The Milwaukee Cannibal

FAIR USE NOTICE

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. As a journalist, I am making such material available in my efforts to advance understanding of artistic, cultural, historic, religious and political issues. I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Copyrighted material can be removed on the request of the owner.