It is my opinion that Anna is giving us the correct information to get out from under their con.Why do I think that? Because she is telling us WE have to get off our flat asses and do something about our situation.Every other 'voice' when it comes to the 'money' is telling you, we or I am handling this,we white hats,E.T.'s etc etc..we got this yada yada yada.She is correct about gold and silver also.It only has 'value' because those in control say it does.
Dorothy, Come Home!
By Anna Von Reitz
The Wonderful Wizard of Oz was published in 1900, so all those people who are drawing upon the
obvious similarities between Dorothy's trip out of Kansas and our jurisdictional kidnapping must be
wrong..... or are they?
Everyone forgets that there was an earlier bankruptcy than the one in 1933, the bankruptcy of the
Scottish Interloper doing business as "The United States of America, Incorporated" from 1868 to
1953.
That first bankruptcy technically began in 1896 and went to court in 1907 and was in process until it
finally settled in 1953. Frank L. Baum had plenty of time, if he was an Insider, to contemplate the
impacts of this first bankruptcy and write it all down as a children's story.
By the time the second bankruptcy of the Roman Catholic Delaware Corporation doing business as
"the" United States of America, Incorporated hit in 1933, our land resources were already impounded
as security for the first bankruptcy and weren't available. So FDR used us, our bodies and our labor
and our private assets, to back-stop the debts of the second bankruptcy.
That's why the results that Frank L. Baum presented originally in 1900 didn't become as obvious as
he assumed until the 1930's.
We have been "transported" to the foreign jurisdiction of the British Territorial United States and then
kidnapped again into the foreign jurisdiction of the Municipal United States --- and all without any
Due Notice or Due Process from our unfaithful servants.
At which point, it's time for "Dorothy" to click the heels of her Ruby Slippers three times and realize
--- "There's no place like home...."
If you are missing America the way it should be, then it is more than past time for you and millions of
others to take up the challenge posed by these Usurpers and False Trustees.
Donald Trump is doing his best, but he can't do it alone from his side of the fence. It requires a
collaboration. Dorothy and Toto have to do their part, and then the Good Witch Glinda has to do
hers.
If you've been in the proverbial "Land of Oz" as long as you care to be, then get started on the road
home.
Declare and record your correct nationality and political status, and either join or start your
own County Jural Assembly.
There are a lot of people out there selling one idea or another, focusing on one part of the fraud or
another, but the only ultimate solution is to go home to Kansas and restore the lawful government
and the Public Law you are owed.
Donald Trump is the President of a bankrupt foreign corporation. About the best he can do is keep the
boat afloat and fend off false claims against the cargo by would-be pirates. The real solution and the
only real solution that there is, is up to me and you.
Click those Ruby Slippers.
Assemble your State Jural Assemblies and get ready to "reconstruct" the Federal States of States---- a
job that has been pending for 150 years. Once you reclaim your status as a Kansan, Vermonter or
Minnesotan or..... and assemble your State Jural Assembly, the so-called "Eternal Emergency" will be
over at last.
And so will any excuse for European hanky-panky and false claims in commerce.
You will be home, back in Kansas. Or California. Or Wyoming. Or Michigan. Or Maine. Or..... and all
the Wicked Witches can just go flap their jaws somewhere else.
The Implications for Police
By Anna Von Reitz
Following my apparently earth-shattering comments yesterday revealing that the police
are not functioning as Public Law Officers and that they are in fact organized under
Pinkerton Laws that allowed the railroads and the Pony Express to establish private
security agencies to protect the mail and the transportation corridors (the US Marshals
Service is the only legitimate present-day heir to all that specific legislation) there have
been a lot of comments asking:
Have you talked to all the Sheriffs and people involved in "law enforcement" about this?
God knows, I've tried.
We have 3,100 elected County "Sheriffs" in this country, most of whom are good and
honest men who respect the lives and property of their constituents. Of course, we also
have some real cads who have gotten into office, too, and a fair number of what in the
military are called, "flat asses"-- men who think that their job is to sit at a desk and mark
time.
The cads don't want to hear what I have to say because its bad for business. The flat
asses don't care about much of anything. And the good men usually react in denial of the,
"That can't be right!" kind.
But I am right about this, and it is true.
They are all "private security personnel" if they are working for incorporated "States of
States" or incorporated "Counties" and most if not all of them are acting under color of
law.
Most of them don't even know this.
They think that they are Public Law Officers, just like the people assume they are Public
Law Officers. They assume that they are occupying an elected Public Office and working
under a Public Bond--- and they are not.
Those elections are all private in-house corporate elections decided by "registered voters"
--- corporate franchisees, and there is no public bonding for their "State of State" and
"County" offices, either.
Why? Because the "State of Tennessee" is a private corporation and so is the "STATE OF
TENNESSEE". And so are all their incorporated "Counties". They all have EINs, CAGE numbers, are registered on Dunn and Bradstreet, identified on Thomas.com,
on Manta.com, and traded on the New York Stock Exchange.
Do we all need baseball bats over the head before the reality of this travesty and
lawlessness and ongoing unauthorized plundering of the "Public Trust" sets in?
We have court cases in which the judges (including US Supreme Court Justices) have very
flatly told the public that policemen are not obligated to protect their lives or property.
We have the Mack and Prinz v. USA, Inc. Supreme Court case that "allows" private
security personnel to enforce the Public Law, including the Constitution, if the individual
"Sheriff" feels the whim to do so.
And if he doesn't, well, that's okay, too.
Many of my readers will-remember and my website fully documents letters that I sent to
the "County" "Sheriff" in Grant County Oregon and to "County Sheriffs" in general at the
time of the Malheur Wildlife Refuge Occupation in an effort to explain exactly these issues
--- and to encourage the individuals to exercise their "prerogative" guaranteed by Mack
and Prinz v. USA, Inc. to enforce the Public Law and uphold the Constitution.
The information fell on deaf ears. The Constitutional guarantees owed to the Bundys and
to the others were trampled.
Instead of securing the life, person, and property of LaVoy Finicum, the "County" Sheriffs
conspired with equally private and unauthorized "law enforcement agents" working for
the "FBI" [which was and so far as I know, still is, owned and operated by the same
private municipal corporation as the "BLM"] to ambush and murder a completely innocent
American under color of law.
In the aftermath of that shameful and still-unpunished crime, the "County" Sheriffs
involved and the FBI all closed ranks and lied through their teeth about the whole
operation, which led to two more years of false arrest and detainment and abuse of the
Bundys and their Co-Defendants.
Please bear in mind that the Bundys and those with them would still be in jail and being
subjected to torture, solitary confinement, etc., etc., etc., if not for one very courageous
and determined Witness against this criminality and corruption.
There was still one American left in the FBI who knew his duty to the Public Law----and
owned it.
The plain fact is that none of these men-- these "Sheriffs" and "FBI Agents" have any
public office at all, and no authority even based on the Pinkerton Laws, because nothing
they are doing has anything to do with the mail service or the railroads.
So far as we are concerned, if we call it for what it is, they are simply armed thugs
operating under color of law at the behest of private for-profit foreign corporations and
their local franchises.
They have, as I told the "Sheriff" of Grant County, exactly the same authority and status
as a floorwalker at Walmart-- except for the fact that these "Sheriffs" and "Agents" are
operating under color of law, and the floorwalker is being honest about what he is doing.
If you dig a little deeper into the quagmire of racketeering, injustice, and insanity this has
inspired, you will find a great many good men being blackmailed because they have in
fact committed gross crimes while unaware of their status -- crimes like the murder of
LaVoy Finicum, the attack on Ruby Ridge, the Branch Davidians, and literally millions of
lesser offenses, like the seizure of private property --- automobiles and home and land,
etc., under false pretenses.
Having once stumbled into the mud, it must seem to them that there is no way out and
that they have to continue to lie and do the bidding of the perpetrators of all this
corruption.
There are in fact several options made available to them by Mack and Prinz v. USA, Inc.
and by the actual Public Law of this country.
They can en masse turn "state's evidence" and report all the crimes to the public and
plea for amnesty.
They can individually decide to enforce the Public Law and the guarantees of the
Constitution and do their Public Duty--- which includes arresting any federally-connected
employee who violates the rights or steals the assets of any American.
And that includes the District Attorneys as well as FBI Agents.
We have a real problem in this country that is caused by malfunctioning and corrupt
District Attorneys, who protect corrupt "Sheriffs" and attorneys as employees of the same
corporations the D.A.s work for, and who also knowingly or unknowingly mis-direct the
"Sheriffs" and attorneys.
After all, who was it at Waco, directing the fire bombing of the Branch Davidians and
grossly violating their right to life as well as their right to religious freedom? Murdering
little children and innocent women in the name of saving them?
Janet Reno, USAG.
If she weren't already dead, there are many of us who would happily give her the thumb's
down a second time around.
When enough people wake up and remember who is who and what is what and who
works for who around here, it won't take "an act of Congress" to arrest these thugs.
The
moment they step off of actual federal property they will be in the jaws of the actual
Public Law and in the hands of the Living God.
Money and Favorite Uncles
By Anna Von Reitz
I had five Uncles on my Mother's side of the family, and they were all favorites--- in different ways.
There was Julius, the hunting, fishing, orchard-pruning, campfire- making, ghost story-spinning
Uncle. He would pack an extra bologna sandwich and take me along just because he missed his own
daughter who was all grown up.
And Gene, the High Society Uncle, with the fancy suits and Lincoln Continentals and an addiction to
good whiskey. He was so handsome the women used to literally gasp. Not that they meant to. He'd
blow into town like a High Wind and take us all to the movies or the Strawberry Festival or whatever
else was going on.
And Merrill, the Bonne Homme Uncle, who taught me how to catch a Snapping Turtle with a willow
branch, how to lay a straight course of bricks, and who could name all the constellations in the sky.
He was the quietest Uncle, but also the most observant. That's why I got the most spankings from
him....
There was Merton, my Mother's Fraternal Twin, the dreamy musician and mathematician who could
play any instrument in the band, do any kind of sum in his head, and make a stone grow. He was a
Radio Operator in Patton's Third Army, and I don't think he ever really came home.
And finally, Henry, who was a Pilot in the US Army Air Force flying giant transport planes "over the
Hump" in World War II; he had a smile like Henry Fonda and everyone loved him, even me, though he
teased me without mercy and was forever pulling sly jokes.
Henry was the kind of Uncle who would pull quarters out from behind his ears and pretend to have
captured your nose, the kind of guy who would tell you that your face was covered in purple spots for
no reason at all, who would switch his empty can of pop for your full one if you let him, who would
ask what time of day it was at ten o'clock at night....
You had to stay on your toes with Henry.
Not one of us kids was slow on the uptake, and it was largely because of him.
He was always up to something. Some joke. Some deceitful prank. Some silly observation that was
a combination of cynical and sweet.
It's because of Henry that I recognized the con job of money early on.
It was plain to me that no piece of paper was equivalent to candy bars.
Even at age four.
I said to him one day, "Why are all these people pretending about money? Is it some kind of game?"
He coughed rather violently, then gave me a slow, considering stare.
"Well, yes, I suppose it is," he said. "But it's a game nobody has any choice about playing."
That set my young wheels spinning again. Okay, it's a game, but we don't have a choice? Since
when are games mandatory?
The plain fact is that money is a con game worse than any sideshow scam, is now and always has
been. And just as Henry said, we are being forced to play this con game via "Legal Tender Laws"
which are themselves illegal.
Can you all say, "forced and inequitable contract"?
For over a hundred years, we have been treated to the spectacle of otherwise sane Americans
accepting nothing but an I.O.U. from the Federal Reserve in exchange for our apples and widgets and
labor.
That's where the staggering "National Debt" of the Municipal and British Territorial United States
comes from --- from all the credit that we have extended to them under force and duress of "Legal
Tender Laws". And that's what makes us their priority creditors.
Paper really isn't equivalent to chocolate bars.
That, and the fact that we paid the blackguards up front face value for their otherwise worthless
script. We, ourselves, underwrote the currency even before anyone began trading it, which adds
another whole layer to the fraud.
Robbed, embezzled, conned --- call it what you will. Our public servants have done this to us all and
the banks have colluded with them on it.
The day is going to come when you are all going to wake up and shake your heads like Rip Van
Winkle and say, "What is all this nonsense?"
And you will know, as I have known all these years, that money is nothing but a game that you've
been forced to play by people having less than zero authority to impose Legal Tender Laws on you in
the first place.
When you finally realize that its all just an ugly joke, that you have been a fool, and that "the
government" is at fault for this, you will no doubt be angry, too.
And you will wonder---- oh, my! oh, my! --- what do we do?
The first thing most people do is run headlong down to the jewelry store or gold exchange and start
buying gold coins and bullion and stock in mining companies, but there, too, you are being shortchanged.
It's the whole proposition of money that stinks, not just the form of it.
It doesn't really matter what you use "as" money --- paper or metals or plastics. Wampum beads will
do as a cure. It's all just nothing but Flim-Flam de Jour.
And that is the part where most people balk and blink and think: what? There's no good alternative?
It's not even a matter of alternatives? It's all just bunko in the first place?
But if there's no money --- no money at all --- what then?
Then we finally deal with the reality of life and our need to be able to translate bongo drums into
shoe leather and pig snouts into pomade. And we deeply consider --- maybe for the first time ever ---
how to construct a monetary system that is honest?
1 comment:
I am not a (financially) rich man but I would pay good money to see a online unexpurgated interview between Anna Von Reitz and ANY legal authority who would like to contest her allegations. There is so much confusion about this topic and what it means to the average human's life. It needs an "official" vetting to discover actionable "truth",otherwise this is just a "feel good excercise" that frustrates people.
IMHO we are still operating under the Babylonian "Money Magic" system which has been in place for millenia and will maintain "until Jesus comes or until we meet again".
Post a Comment