YES VIRGINIA,THE CHARLOTTESVILLE CAR CRASH WAS STAGED

Yes,Virginia, the Charlottesville 

Car Crash was Staged 

by Miles Mathis

@http://mileswmathis.com/index.html 

First published August 31, 2017 

As most probably know, there was a big “alt-right” parade scheduled for Charlottesville, Virginia, on August 12, allegedly to protest the removal of a Civil War statue. At the last minute, police canceled the parade, but a counter-protest was allowed to go on consisting of Black Lives Matter marchers, alt leftists, and Antifa militants. The event allegedly descended into a brawl, which was topped off by a car allegedly driven into a group of counter-protesters. We are told the driver was a neo-Nazi of some sort, angry at the liberals on the street. One woman allegedly died and 19 others were allegedly injured. 

I am here to confirm that the whole thing was faked. The march was manufactured, and so was the brawl and the car crash. Nobody died and nobody was injured. All the necessary evidence has been posted at Youtube, so I am not going to spend much time on this. I am just going to tell you what to look for so that you see the truth as quickly as possible. Then I am going to post a warning. 

Huge amounts of live footage of the event have been uploaded to Youtube, so this one is very easy. You can go to the VeganWarrior and Sonofnewo, for instance, to view this footage. The VeganWarrior's analysis is much quicker, but Sonofnewo may also be worth watching. And there are others. The livefeed of a guy named Ford Fischer is very revealing and several channels are using his film. 

Here is what to look for, briefly: 

1) Fischer films the gray Dodge Challenger and the maroon minivan five minutes before the crash, already on the streets. He points his camera right at them, as if he is signaling someone with his live feed that “all are on their marks”. 

2) In the various feeds, we see hundreds of protesters, but surprisingly, most of them are white kids. I would say 95% of those we see are white and under 30. That by itself is the sign of a fake. Although Charlottesville has a large black population, the spooks apparently couldn't get many of them to turn up. They couldn't even hire them, I guess. We see only a handful of black folks, although this was ostensibly a Black Lives Matter event. Do only white kids think that Black Lives Matter? 

3) The maroon minivan that ended up at the front of the three-car pile-up was parked at that intersection five minutes before the crash. It never moved. Notice that it is parked right in the middle of the street, blocking traffic into the intersection. Somehow, that is not perceived as a problem by the police in the vicinity, who never tell the driver to move on. Also, we see quite a bit of footage of the minivan parked there, from several feeds, and no one ever has to go around it. This indicates traffic behind it was being controlled by police, and that the street was probably closed a block back. Since the Challenger somehow got through nonetheless, we have indication the police were in on it. Much other evidence of that is readily available, and that is just one example. 

4) In another live feed, the cameraman walks right by the maroon minivan and points his video cam into the driver's window. She is also filming him with her red cellphone. We see that the driver is. . . Heather Heyer, the alleged victim. We have a match on the fat arms, the tattoo, the hair, the color of her sleeveless shirt, and the red cellphone. So she apparently got out of the minivan and was run over by her own car? She parked in that intersection for at least five minutes, so that she could be run over by her own car? OK. 

5) In Ford Fischer's feed, we see that one block away, two minutes before the crash, a green medical cart is parked, with a stretcher in the back and a light already flashing on top. About 100 yards further on is a large military vehicle, blocking the entire street. Right after the crash, we see the same military vehicle blocking the street behind the crash. It got there before any of the police, though the police were there within about two minutes. As soon as the Challenger backed out, the military vehicle moved in where it had left. Curious. Or not so curious, since it was only one block away, waiting to do just that. This indicates the military was also involved. This event was clearly co-ordinated by some arm of military intelligence, and my guess is it was overseen by D.H.S. They benefit most from events like this. It would also explain why so many people are blowing the cover of this event, and why so much evidence is being “leaked”. The research shouldn't be this easy. As I have said before in many previous papers, CIA appears to be undercutting many D.H.S fake events, in a sort of turf war. We see that again here. 

6) Film and stills of the crash exist in abundance, which is also a clue. Since the crash only took seconds, it seems unlikely that so many people would be training their cameras in that direction. If the crash had been real, we would expect film of the aftermath, but not of the crash itself. There was no reason for anyone to be filming those three cars until they hit. For example, notice the guy in the blue shirt filming in the shot above. He doesn't seem too worried by the Challenger, does he? The Challenger must have passed within inches of his feet, and yet he steps right behind to film the black guy, who is doing his flips only about two feet away. The cameraman sure lucked out on his position and timing, right? 

7) The film looks extravagantly staged, with bodies of athletic young men flying everywhere. Ask yourself why these young men were standing between the three cars in the intersection. And if they were so athletic, why couldn't they get out of the way sooner, without so much last minute gymnastics? We see that the Challenger wasn't actually moving that fast. Maybe 15 miles per hour, and Challengers are loud. They are a lot like Chargers. Are we supposed to believe these young men—although gymnasts—were deaf and blind? 

8) These gymnast guys weren't among the injured. We see them afterwards, sitting around and preening. We see the black guy sitting prominently on the truck to the side afterwards. Although fat women are allegedly dying or bleeding heavily just feet away, this dude looks like he is taking a coffee break. He couldn't be cooler. 

9) So it looks like they just hired several stunt actors to stage this thing. Heather Heyer appears to be another one of these, and my guess is she is also some sort of stunt woman. Heyer may be a Jewish name. 

10) The mainstream can't decide if Heyer is 32 or 23 years old. Nineteen days after the event, Newsweek is still telling us Heyer is 23, while other outlets are saying she is 32. It would have to be the latter, since CNN tells us Heyer was a paralegal for a local law firm, having worked there five years. Strange that we aren't given the law firm, so we can't research that claim. However, we can do a people search on her. CNN gives her father's name as Mark, but the computers do not confirm that. They give her father's name as Nicholas, with no other relatives listed except her mother. And we find the law firm was Larry Miller Law Group. Also interesting is that although the big computers give no other places of residence for Heyer than Charlottesville and Ruckersville, VA, she is also listed as having worked at Wine Country Family Law, which is in Santa Rosa, CA. If she worked there, why don't the computers realize she lived there? 

11) We have an even bigger problem with James Alex Fields, Jr., age 20, of Ohio, allegedly the driver of the Challenger. He has been arrested for murder. Intelius lists no such person in the entire state. So let's widen that search and change engines. At Instant Check Mate, we search on James Fields of Ohio, no middle initial or name given. No one by that name comes up of any age close to 20. If we then try again with the middle initial A. and age 20, but search the entire US, we again get nothing. This indicates he is a ghost: a person manufactured by Intelligence. Remember, we saw the same thing with Dylann Storm Roof of Charleston and Adam Lanza of Sandy Hook. The big computers have never heard of them. 

12) Ford Fischer's name is also a clue, as my regular readers will realize. Researchers have discovered his real name is Andrew Fischer, but one of them astutely suggested Ford was his middle name. I would guess that is true. Both names—Fischer and Ford—link him to the families. And not only to the families, but to the families with Hollywood connections. Don't see what I mean? Well, what if his name were Hamill Ford Fischer? Would that help you figure it out? No? How about Hamill Ford Fischer Lucas? No? How about Hamill Ford Fischer Lucas C3PO R2D2? Have you got it now? 

13) According to mintpressnews.com, Ford Fischer works for Solutions Institute, and their website tells us they are an activist training group. Hmmm. Do activists need to be trained? Trained to do what, exactly? Looks like another CIA (or DHS) front to me. Don't believe me? Go to the sidebar on the front page and notice the names of the recent authors of “3%” articles: Goldsmith, Hahn, etc. Prominent Jewish names. What a surprise. Fischer is also a Jewish name. 

14) By the way, you may be interested to know that Carrie Fisher, Eddie Fisher, Debbie Reynolds, Elizabeth Taylor, Connie Stevens, and all the famous people from that family are listed in the British peerage, although we aren't told why. None of them are linked to actual peers, so the links must have been scrubbed. One clue that may help you: look at Liz Taylor's husbands, starting with her third, Michael Todd. He was the son of Chaim Goldbogen and Sophia Hellerman. Following that clue, go to her first husband, Conrad Hilton, whose mother was a Barron, whose mother was a Laufersweiler. Barron is a variant of Baron/Barent, as in Sacha Baron Cohen. Baron Cohen was originally Barent-Cohen, which family is closely related to the Rothschilds. Getting the picture? 

15) Also take a look at the disappearing girl behind the Challenger as it backs out. This footage is interesting because it shows film of the crash was also put through CGI afterwards, with figures added. 

16) Note the number of people allegedly injured: 19. Hmmm. Not like the 19 hijackers? Not like the 19 guerrillas led by Castro? And so on and so on. 

17) Finally, take a look at the various license plates, which signal this as a hoax. The Dodge Challenger has an Ohio license plate GVF 1111.

 

Most likely that is a specialty plate, and the GVF stands for something. We will look at that in a moment. But there is another problem. A search on that plate leads to a family in Michigan, not Ohio. So why isn't it a Michigan plate? We are told the current owner Fields didn't replace the old plates, but in the articles on the web we find the Michigan family claiming they sold the car to a dealer in 2012. So it wasn't a private sale. The dealer wouldn't have resold the car with the old plates on it, so something doesn't add up here. We are told Fields had been charged not only with murder but previously with posting illegal plates, but if that is true the dealer should also be charged with the same crime. No indication of that. Even weirder: video of Fields' mom in the wheelchair hit the news, and in the background is her Hyundai. The plates? GVF 1122. Others have pointed out that families don't normally have matching plates like that, but the problem is bigger than that, as we just saw. The story is that Fields' plates came from this family in Michigan. Did his mother also buy her car from this same dealer in Michigan who doesn't replace plates? Is that what we are supposed to believe? And did the dealer buy both the Dodge and the Hyundai from the Michigan family, which for some reason has matching specialty plates? This indicates to me that the Michigan family is involved in this somehow. 

The debunking sites like Metabunk are trying to defuse this bomb, but as usual they are failing. And, as usual, they are lying right to your face. Mick West tells us the car was linked by Gotnews to the Michigan family via the VIN number, not the plate, but that is a lie. As we saw in the CNNMoney link I posted above, Gotnews ran a simple trace on the license plate, not the VIN number. You can't see the VIN number in the news stories, can you? You couldn't, because it is small and is on the dashboard, inside the front window. You can only see the plate. Quoting from the article: 

The sleuthing performed by these activists was not very complex. Images from the scene of the deadly attack had captured the vehicle and its license plate number. GotNews said in its story, which carried no byline, that it then ran a license plate search which returned a registration result for Jerome Vangheluwe. 

Also see the ToledoBlade.com, which reports that Fields was convicted of having illegal plates on this car back in June. That would explain why the plates traced back to Michigan, wouldn't it? Does Mick West have anything to say about that? Of course not. West says, “The name returned (Jerome V....) is not that of the driver, it's the name of the previous owner of the car. This is tied to the VIN number, and not the license plate.” But that's not true. Do you think your name is tied to the VIN number of your car, but not the license plate? C'mon! That's what license plates are for, for crying out loud! To tie the car to a real person for the sake of identification. You can't arrest a car, you can only arrest a person. The fact that the license plate leads back to the wrong person is very important here, but West just blows by that. If the license plate were legal and correct, it would lead back to the correct owner, wouldn't it? So West's claim that Gotnews' “scraping” of public sources online led to out-of-date information is garbage. This has nothing to do with information being out-of-date, as you see. You don't just update license plates with a new name, do you? You have to get new plates. So, as usual, Metabunk has debunked nothing. Like the other fake debunking sites owned by the government (Snopes, etc.), it has tried to debunk the truth, but failed miserably. They should call the site Megabunkum. 

And we find more problems. At coed.com, we find a story on Joel Vangheluwe, the young man from Michigan initially tied to the car. While other sites say Joel never owned the car (it being owned by his father, who never actually gave it to him), this site reports that he did own the car when he turned 16. He later sold it. But the problem is not only the changing stories, the problem is that no one can do math. We are told Joel graduated from Romeo High School in 2015. Assuming he was 17 or 18 when he graduated, he would have been 15-16 in 2013. But many other mainstream sites tell us the car was sold by the family in 2012, when he would have been 14-15. Given the story we are told, we would have assumed dad bought him the car new in 2010 and that they sold it for some reason in 2012. But Joel would have been 12 or 13 in 2010. The only way we can make this work out mathematically is if Joel graduated late, at age 20, say. You will say we will never know, but it is quite easy to check. We just do a people search on Joel. Intelius gives us no age for Joel, and we are about to see why. Instant Check Mate tells us Joel Vangheluwe of Romeo, MI, related to Jerome Vangheluwe, is currently 28, which means that in 2015 he was. . . 26. So we are supposed to believe he graduated from Romeo High School at age 26? 

His father Jerome is also a red flag, since he is Vice President of Jordan Health Care in Detroit. What are the odds that we would run a random license plate and find the Vice President of a major company? But here is the spookiest thing of all. Get ready to gasp. If we go to Jerome Vangheluwe's  LinkedIn page, in the sidebar we find the usual “people also viewed” list.

[Go to the link above or page 5 of the PDF link at the bottom,I cannot locate a screen shot of his page. D.C.]

The first is Kelly Gannon, a colleague at Jordan. The second is Michael Kuhn, also an executive in health care. The third is Eric Sharber, also an executive in health care. Same for the next four. But then we find in the eighth position Alex Fields, Investment Banking Analyst at Perella Weinberg Partners. Do you recognize that name? Remember James Alex Fields, the alleged driver of the Challenger? You will say that is because a lot of researchers beat me to the page for Vangheluwe, then typed in James Alex Fields to see if there was a link at LinkedIn. So let's follow them and see if that is the case. We scroll down to the “search by name” box and type in James Alex Fields. But we can't do that, because there are only slots for first and last name. No middle name. So we must assume any previous sleuths typed in James Fields. But if they had typed in James Fields, then some James Fields would appear in Vangheluwe's sidebar list, not some Alex Fields. Are you following me? This indicates to me that Alex Fields does not appear in Vangheluwe's sidebar by accident. We will see more evidence of that below. Since we saw above it was a fake name, I think we now know where they got it. 

If we then search on Jordan Health Service and Jordan Health Care, we find nothing in Detroit or Michigan. Jordan Health Services is in Texas, Oklahoma, and Louisiana, with no offices in Detroit. There is also a Jordan Health Care in New York, but again, no links to Detroit. Vangheluwe previously worked at Memorial Hermann, also in Texas (Houston); and at Evolution Health, in Dallas. Curiously, all these places he has worked for have one-star ratings on Google. People hate them, apparently. 

The search engines tell us these Vangheluwes are related to the Schneiders by recent marriage, and FamilyTree tells us  they also have a current location in Edmond, OK. Whitepages tells us Jerome Vangheluwe has a previous address in Blacklick, OH, which may go some way to explaining the Ohio license plate. The same page tells us a family member lives in Killeen, TX. If we collate those locations, we begin to smell familiar smoke. I used to live in Austin, so I know that Killeen is the site of the huge army base Ft. Hood. Edmond is a suburb of Oklahoma City, site of Tinker AFB. So what about Blacklick, OH? It is a suburb east of Columbus, and Wright-Patterson AFB is to the west, less than an hour away. However, a check of Google maps shows us that not only is Blacklick on the edge of several country clubs, indicating a wealthy neighborhood, it is also within spitting distance (two miles) of Defense Logistics. What is Defense Logistics? It is DOD's combat logistics support agency. Are you beginning to get the picture? So my best guess at this point is that those license plates are government plates. G.V.F likely stands for Government Vehicle Fleet. But they weren't issued to any Federal Agency, which is why that prefix isn't on the lists. They were probably issued to Defense Logistics in Columbus. We find confirmation of this if we search on Defense Logistics Virginia, where we find  that Defense Logistics P.T.A.C (Procurement Technical Assistance Program) does indeed have an office in Charlottesville. They are probably the ones that supplied that big urban assault vehicle we saw in the live feeds. 

So you see the license plate is just the tip of another iceberg. As with Sandy Hook, we are quickly drawn down an endless rabbit hole of lies, ghosts, and fronts, leading us as usual to military and Intel. 

But let's follow another line. We saw that Alex Fields at LinkedIn worked for Perella Weinberg Partners. What is that? If we go to its own website, we get nothing, as usual. This is the first blurb we get, under the title Advisory: 

As global markets shift and become more complex, P.W.P provides comprehensive independent advisory services for your most pressing strategic issues. With decades of experience, we help you navigate complex situations by delivering novel insights, tailored solutions and unparalleled access to the brightest minds. We help you act decisively and achieve your strategic objectives.

What? Does that have any content? No, it is just jactation. This site reads like another front. And if we go to Wikipedia, we get more red flags on this alleged company. We are told it was launched in 2006, and its initial advisory council was led by Walter Isaacson. You remember him, right? Aspen Institute CEO, CNN CEO, and Mangling (stet) Editor of TIME who also wrote the books on  Steve Jobs, Ben Franklin, Albert Einstein, and Henry Kissinger. We have seen him in several previous papers on those people. He was also Vice Chairman of the Katrina Recovery Program. He did a great job there, right? Wikipedia also gives us a clue in our current mystery: they admit he is a member of the US Department of Defense Innovation Advisory Board (DIB). Do you think this might be connected to Defense Logistics? I do now. DIB just opened in 2016, and its board includes Isaacson, Jeff Bezos, Reid Hoffman, Cass Sunstein, Marne Levine, Adam Grant, and Richard M. Murray. Notice anything there? Most if not all are Jewish. They are also towering creeps. 

For instance, you will remember Sunstein as Bush's head of OIRA, where as the top “legal scholar” he argued that mililtary tribunals called by the President without Congressional approval were no problem. He said the idea they were illegal was ludicrous—that is, until the Supreme Court found them illegal in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld in 2006. Hamdan was Osama bin Laden's driver. The US Appeals Court that heard Hamdan's case later agreed, acquitting him of all charges. His record is clean to this day, although he is said to have served many years at Guantanamo. I suspect the whole thing was faked, but we will have to look at it later. [Just realize that if Osama was working for us, arresting his driver makes no sense. The rest of the story falls apart.] Sunstein also authored the notorious 2008 paper “Conspiracy Theories”, which argued that “cascades” of faulty information could lead to violence. He wished to use this as an excuse to shut down debate and information sharing (as in this paper) on a wide range of topics in the name of national security. If Sunstein had his way, I would not be allowed to post the research I do, you see. So this ties directly into the matter at hand. It is no coincidence to find Sunstein's name coming up in my research on Charlottesville. Clearly, those who ran the Charlottesville event are the same people that have been trying to turn the US into a shopping-gulag* since 2001. Which is why I look to D.H.S. Defense Logistics is probably run by D.H.S, as is this newer D.I.B. 

In that paper on conspiracy theories, Sunstein says this: 

Our main policy idea is that government should engage in cognitive infiltration of the groups that produce conspiracy theories. 

We have seen they have done that, in spades. They have hired many people to surround my research with noise, and many others to spread disinfo. However, if I am wrong, wouldn't it be much easier and cheaper to simply show where I am wrong? Why the need for “cognitive infiltration”? If you are winning an argument, you don't need to resort to cognitive infiltration, do you? If the government had been winning this argument, all people with any native intelligence would have seen that, right? So there would be no need to resort to such tricks. The very fact they have resorted to tricks means they were losing the argument. The entire government and all its hired talking heads and writing hands were and are losing to a few people like me, and by going ahead with these pathetic projects they are pretty much admitting that. They have been caught in a mountain of lies, and instead of admitting defeat and going straight, they have signaled they would prefer to arrest anyone who catches them in a lie, trying him as a terrorist. Since they haven't figured out how to do that under the current legal system, they have fallen back on Plan B: create cognitive infiltration of everything and everyone; also further infiltrate the legal system, corrupting it beyond all recognition; and drug the general population into a stupor, to lower resistance to lies to zero. 

But, miracle of miracles, even Plan B is failing, and it appears to be failing because these guys are such bad eggs, and are seen to be even by those in Intelligence and Military. In other words, these bastards like Sunstein aren't just getting push back from little guys like me, they are getting push back from people at all levels all over the world, including prominent people at various 3-letter agencies. That much I can intuit. I also intuit that DHS will eventually crumble completely into rubble, and I know that because I know that no one wants to live in the world these people have planned for us. Even most of the rich and powerful people don't want to live in that world. Many of them hate the New World Order as much as you do, since it is a guarantee of misery from top to bottom. It would be a sort of Mordor, where not even Sauron was happy. The One-who-ruled-them-all would simply be the most cursed. 

But back to Charlottesville. Some will say they can't stage something this big. Hundreds of people were there and took part. So I remind you that the mainstream admits Leni Riefenstahl hired 30,000 extras for her Nazi films in the 1930s. If you want to hire a lot of people to stage something like this, it is quite easy to do. You only need a lot of money and a lot of people with no scruples. They are now a dime a dozen. 

What this means is that all the guff afterwards was also staged, like the fake Daily Stormer saying that Heyer deserved to die because she was fat and didn't have any kids. The Stormer is linked through its name to Stormfront, and they are both Intel fronts. They were manufactured as part of cognitive infiltration, you know. Remember, the mainstream admits the American Nazi Party was founded by George Lincoln Rockwell, Office of Naval Intelligence. Intel is trying to start fights between all groups, to keep the heat off their masters. They want you fighting with your neighbors instead of coming after them, you see. Classic misdirection. Heyer didn't deserve to die, since she didn't die. She deserves to be arrested for faking an event, along with all her superiors. But that would require shutting down large parts of DHS or whatever, so it ain't gonna happen in the short term. 

It is so easy to tell the whole Black Lives Matter project is fake. You can tell just by the name. I mean, I don't remember any real person saying that Black Lives Don't Matter. Did I miss something? Did some credible person make that claim? This is 2017, and I don't think anyone is suggesting that Black Lives Don't Matter, so why do we need a group insisting that they do matter? One of my neighbors has a new sign up that lists his/her educated credo, and it includes this Black Lives Matter thing as well as the statement that Women's Rights are Human Rights. What? Of course they are, but is that supposed to be some new information? According to the old syllogistic rules I learned in my logic class in college, that just means that women are human. Has any credible person recently suggested that women are NOT human? I guess I missed that. That's what I get for not having a TV. 

When I see someone with a sign like that in their front yard, I now assume one of two things: 1) these people work for the government, possibly Intel, 2) these people are useful idiots who will put up any sign that makes them look like “caring” individuals, even if it also makes them look like government shills. Although most people would lean heavily to 2, I lean heavily to 1, for reasons I have explained in previous papers. 

The sign in my neighbor's front yard also includes the assertion that Science is Real. Again, what? It sort of depends on what/whose Science we are talking about, doesn't it? Is everything labeled “science” real? Of course not. What the sign-posters intend is that mainstream science is real. They are defending it against Trump's remarks, I guess. But since Trump isn't real, this is hardly necessary. Both Trump and mainstream science are fake, but that says nothing about the status of science as a category. Although mainstream science is fake, real science is real. That is to say, science that is true is real because it is true. Sort of a truism, right? It is kind of like the statement grass is real. Yes, some grass is real. Real grass is real and fake grass is fake, by definition. 

The truth is, most things are now fake. That is the reality. Both sides of this news story were faked. Black Lives Matter is fake, the alt-right is fake, neo-Nazis are fake, Antifa is fake, the car crash was fake, the white kids were fake (hired), Trump is fake (hired), Congress is fake (hired), the media is fake, the economy is fake, the stock market is fake, mainstream science is fake, mainstream history is fake, mainstream art is fake, reported prices and salaries are fake, sport is fake, politics is fake, and so on. 

If Trump gets impeached, it will be fake, since his election was fake. If you see race wars, they will be fake. Just assume that anything you see on TV, hear on the radio, or read in the papers IS FAKE. That is to say, it is false. It is a lie. It did not happen and is not happening, therefore it does not require your action or response—except insofar as you tell these people to buzz off. It does not require that you donate to charities, that you pay more taxes, that you tie yellow ribbons, that you buy guns or duct tape, that you write letters to the editor, that you update your vaccines, or that you take antidepressants. You don't need to be depressed about things that are not happening. Just do what I am now doing: laughing into the cool night breeze and petting my kittens. 

Some will write to me and tell me that is a glib response. They will say, “C'mon, Miles, there is a hell of a lot to be depressed about, even if all these things are fake. You yourself have admitted that they have destroyed art, science, health, healthy sex, the family and a million other things. You complain about this all the time. Don't tell us to just laugh it off and get a kitten!” 

Well, I am not telling you to just laugh it off and get a kitten. Although that is a good start. Yes, I am angry about all those things, but I am not depressed. I am not taking anti-depressants and I am not losing any sleep. Why? Because I know that they cannot prevent me from doing real art, real science, or anything else real. They have not prevented it. I have done it. They can promote a fake existence, but I do not have to buy it. I am not buying it. And you can do the same. Nothing is stopping you from creating real art, science, music, poetry, literature, or whatever you like. If you don't think you have that ability, nothing is stopping you from supporting, buying, underwriting, patroning, or otherwise encouraging good and beautiful things, to whatever extent you can. Nothing is stopping you from making the world within your reach as lovely as you can, through cooking, parenting, gardening, or a thousand other things. 

As it goes with art and science, it goes with sex and the family. No one is stopping you from having good sex or a nice family. Or, I should say, they are not stopping you. The governors are not stopping you. They are just telling you things, and you don't have to believe those things. If men and women stopped believing all the things they are told in the media and decided to be nice to one another, the problem would be solved overnight. They have wanted you to be neurotic, and you have complied by becoming neurotic. But you didn't have to do that. It wasn't compulsory. It was a hypnosis, and you could have resisted the hypnosis. You could have kicked Svengali in the nuts and gone on with your life. But you didn't do that. 

Remember, it took two parties to destroy art, for instance. It took the destroyers, whom I have uncloaked in years of research. But it also took all those people who stood by and allowed it to be destroyed, without doing anything. The destruction of art was very easy for the destroyers, since they found art had almost no real defenders. The same could be said for science or almost anything else.

Most people have just lain down and let the world be redefined around them, although they don't like the redefinition. So I am almost as angry at these people as I am at the destroyers. They write me and say, “Oh, but what can I do?” As if they are powerless in the face of the destroyers. No one is powerless, and what you can do is actually quite easy and simple. I just told you what it is. Create and support beauty and truth, and refuse lies and ugliness. Don't buy the world that is sold to you. Refuse it at every turn. Do not work for or with these people, do not take their money, do not give them money. 

Also, do not give to charities, which are almost all scams. Yes, you should support your neighbors who need help, but you should do so through direct patronage. You should give to individuals that you know and that you pick for a reason. Giving indiscriminately to organizations solves nothing. The money almost always goes to the wrong people. If people took the time to get involved locally, face-to-face, these organizations wouldn't be necessary. But because people give to large national organizations, they think they don't need to get involved with their neighbors. So the big charities actually prevent grassroots relationships, and were created in part for that reason. 

Still, some will answer me, “Again, Miles, you are just sugarcoating this. If it is so easy to find good sex and a nice family, why don't you have either one?” Because it takes two to tango. I have thrown off the shackles, but obviously I need a woman who has done the same. That is part of what my writing is about: creating that woman. I am talking to her as I write, trying to teach her how to break free. I am waving my arms to everyone, telling them to come join me, and trying to show them how to do that. But of course you can't “create a woman”. You can only post encouragement: she has to create herself. The same applies to men, of course. 

That's mainly what my papers on serial killers were about. I found I needed to defuse that bomb, for my own selfish purposes. These stories were being believed by the women I was trying to date, and it was affecting me personally. I saw these woman being hypnotized, and I finally realized my only hope was to break the spell. A large part of my life since then has been about breaking that evil spell, and many others. 

So yes, I am angry. Just because I am laughing and petting my kittens doesn't mean I am no longer angry. You can do both, you know. I am not recommending you not be angry. In fact, I recommend you gather your anger and tend it and let the flame grow. That is the road to action. I didn't say don't be angry or disappointed or dissatisfied. Be all those things. I said don't be depressed. Meaning, don't let yourself be squashed. Fight back, day to day and moment to moment. And find joy in your fighting back. Relish the fight. Find joy in your anger. Find joy in your abilities, whatever they are. And continually gather about you little sources of positive energy—which is what my kittens are about. Without these little influences you would topple over from the weight of the world. 

Even so, how can I sleep so soundly, knowing what I know? I know some of you are asking this. On a day-to-day level, I can because I make sure to decompress at the end of each day. I don't go to sleep directly after writing a paper like this, for instance. I watch an episode of Cheers or something. This effectively stops the wheels from turning in my head. But of course it is more than that. I can sleep because although I am dissatisfied with the world, I am ultimately satisfied with my place in it. That is to say, I am satisfied by the work I have done in that day, knowing it was good work well-done, so what others are doing doesn't concern me. It doesn't ruin my sleep. Sleep is ruined by not doing what you were meant to do in a given day. Though the day is over, your subconscious continues to scold you. This is why the rich and famous often look like they never sleep. They don't, and I just told you why. Many of them have never done a good day's work in their lives. Yes, they have been very busy, but since they were busy lying and stealing, their subconscious isn't satisfied. It isn't what they were made to do. No one is made to do that. 

Now for the warning. Both the guys I plugged above, VeganWarrior and SonofNewo, are psyoping you even while they tell you the truth about Charlottesville. I assume the other researchers are as well. Notice that VeganWarrior is a FlatEarther, so he is part of that project. They hire these dopes to tell you the truth about a current event to gain your trust, and then they pull a whammy on you afterwards. VeganWarrior also tells you the truth about the OJ Simpson event, so he is specifically targeting my audience. I am the one that broke that story . So, once again, we see that dozens of people at youtube are running projects aimed directly at me. They confirm my research, but then divert you into FlatEarth, Pizzagate, Trannies, or whatever. It couldn't be more obvious, transparent, and pathetic, but I guess a few people still get fooled by it. I do get some questions about it. 

SonofNewo is doing a similar thing, but with the Kennedy assassination. Notice how he is subtly inserting Kennedy assassination references into his Charlottesville research, naming his videos The Grassy Knoll, the Zapruder film, and so on. As he unwinds Charlottesville, he slyly confirms the Kennedy assassination as real, even plugging the Grassy Knoll theory. This to counter my research, which has shown that whole event was staged as well. I even fingered the director and assistant director: Umbrella Man and Blue Boy. Blue Boy holds up his hand, which indicates “and...”, while Umbrella Man spins his umbrella once in a clockwise direction, indicating “ACTION”. The first shot is fired right after that. 

So, if you go to youtube, you have to go in quick and clean and then get out. Get the truth and then exit before you get your shoes sticky. Almost every one of these “Truthers” is trying to snare you. 

On a related note, soon after I briefly mentioned youtuber RedSilverJ (about three months ago, I think), he hit the wall. Most of his videos have been deleted, and in the few new ones, he sounds different. He talks slower and sounds confused. I don't know what happened there, but it is very curious. To be honest, I now see youtube as a vast nest of spooks, and if I have to go in to grab some data, as above, I go in heavily armored, get what I need, and get out pronto. I double-check all claims and confirm all links. And I don't let anyone draw me off my path. 

*Where your only remaining freedom will be shopping for their products. You will be free to endlessly wander around the mall spending money, but not free to ever leave it. 

http://mileswmathis.com/charl.pdf