PART 5:MASTERS OF DECEPTION:ZIONISM,9/11 AND THE WAR ON TERROR HOAX

MASTERS OF DECEPTION:ZIONISM,9/11 

AND THE WAR ON TERROR HOAX
BY ZANDER C.FUERZA

CHAPTER NINE 

More False-Flags After 9/11: 

Israel At It Again 

Shortly following the 9/11 attacks, Israelis were caught on numerous occasions trying to stage even more false-flag provocations in the U.S. and in other countries. On October 10, 2001 — about a month after 9/11 — an incredible incident took place in Mexico involving two Israelis posing as press photographers. The pair were arrested inside the Mexican congress armed with 9mm pistols, 9 grenades, explosives, three detonators, and 58 bullets, evidently about to mount some sort of attack against the Mexican government. The Mexican newspaper El Diario de Mexico reported that the two Israeli terrorists had fake Pakistani passports in their possession. The Los Angeles-based La Vox De Atzlan publication reported on the incident in great detail. This is one of their first reports of the affair: 

“We were alerted this morning by a subscriber from Mexico that two Israelis were arrested Wednesday inside the Palacio Legislativo de San Lázaro (Mexican Congress) in Mexico City. Both were armed with 9 mm automatics and one was carrying a military hand grenade, electrical wiring and other bomb related materials. The Israeli Embassy at Sierra Madre 2155, colonia Lomas de Chapultepec has close its doors to the Mexican Press and are refusing to talk. The incident has been independently verified by La Voz de Aztlan through Mexican diplomatic, press and other sources in Mexico City. 

The Chief of Legislative Security, Salvador Alarcón, has also confirmed the arrest of the two Israeli terrorists. One of them Saur Ben Zvi is a confirmed citizen of Israel and the other, Salvador Guersson, recently immigrated to Mexico from Israel. It is has been determined by the Procuraduría General de la República (Mexican Department of Justice) that Guersson is a retired Colonel of the Israeli Defense Forces and that he may now be operating as a MOSSAD agent. It is not known how they were able to penetrate the extensive security system of the Mexican Legislative Palace. 

This is a very grave incident with many serious international implications. Many have questioned who may be really behind many of the recent terrorist acts around the world including the ones against the WTC and the Pentagon. The Mexican public and congress has been reticent about declaring war against Islam along with the U.S. It is possible that an act of terrorism against the Mexican Congress was planned in order to “terrorize” Mexico into towing the line against Islam.” http://web.archive.org/web/20070202100734/http:/www.aztlan.net/mexmossad.htm

In a standard display of behind-the-scenes lobbying intrigue, Jews put heavy pressure on the Mexican government to secure the release of the two Israeli terror suspects, most likely resorting to bribery or blackmail in their efforts to free the Mossad assassins. No criminal charges against the two Israelis were pursued and they were quietly deported to Israel. According to La Vox De Atzlan:  

“… the Israeli Embassy used heavy handed measures to have the two Israelis released. Very high level emergency meetings took place between Mexican Secretary of Foreign Relations Jorge Gutman, General Macedo de la Concha and a top Ariel Sharon envoy who flew to Mexico City specially for that purpose. Elías Luf of the Israeli Embassy worked night and day and their official spokeswoman Hila Engelhart went into high gear after many hours of complete silence. What went on during those high levels meetings no ones knows, but many in Mexico are in disbelief at their release. Guns and any kind of explosive is highly illegal for Mexican citizens and the fact that these two Israelis had them inside the Mexican Congress makes their release highly suspect. What is really going on? Jorge Gutman, the Mexican Foreign Secretary, has very strong Zionist connections and himself is of Jewish descent. Mexican Army General Macedo de la Concha has strong connections to the U.S. Military Industrial-Complex and through this to the Israeli Defense Forces. Have any of these connections influenced the decision to release the two Zionist terrorists?” http://web.archive.org/web/20080325180728/http:/www.aztlan.net/blowup.htm

Speaking about the motive of an Israeli false-flag assault against Mexico, La Vox De Atzlan opined: 

“We believe that the two Zionists terrorist were going to blow up the Mexican Congress. The second phase was to mobilize both the Mexican and US press to blame Osama bin Laden. Most likely then Mexico would declare war on Afghanistan as well, commit troops and all the oil it could spare to combat Islamic terrorism.” (Ibid.) 

The failed Israeli attack on the Mexican Congress gained considerable media coverage in Mexico itself, but there was absolutely no mention of it by U.S. media outlets. Beholden to their Jewish editors and bosses, mainstream American journalists are kept on a tight leash, restricted from reporting on Israeli misconduct by Zionist censors. Nothing goes to print in America without first going through the Jewish filter, ensuring that the Israeli Mossad can maneuver throughout the world staging false-flag attacks and committing assassinations as they please, without fearing exposure. Hot on the heels of the Mossad mishap in Mexico, there was another occurrence involving Israelis and potential terrorism. On October 17, 2001, The Mercury reported that three Israeli Jews identified as Ron Katar, Mosche Almakias and Ayelet Reisler were arrested in rural Pennsylvania for suspicious behavior behind a Pizzeria Uno. The manager of the store informed authorities of two Middle Eastern looking men dumping furniture out of a tractor-trailer with a “Moving Systems Incorporated” sign on the side, behind his restaurant. The police searched the vehicle and discovered a Sony video camera containing footage of Chicago with several suspicious zoom-in shots of the Sears Tower. The Israeli suspects were transported to Plymouth Police Station for further questioning. The FBI was notified of the incident and began its own investigation into the Israelis. Elmakias and Katar were eventually detained by INS and transported to a federal facility, and the female, Reisler, was released. (“2 found with video of Sears Tower,” The Mercury, Oct. 17, 2001.) Predictably, like all of the other instances of Israelis engaged in espionage and terrorism in America, nothing of this incident was ever heard of again. Were these three Israelis Mossad agents? Were they planning some sort of false flag attack on the Sears Tower? A real investigation would answer all of these pertinent questions. Instead, we are forced to endure another cover-up of potential terrorism in the U.S. by Israelis. 

Sometime in late October of 2001, six men traveling in two groups of three were stopped by police in the Midwest on suspicions of terrorist activity. The men had photographs, boxcutters and other suspicious equipment. All of the men were Middle Eastern and held Israeli passports. Even though they possessed photos and descriptions of a nuclear power plant in Florida and the Trans-Alaska pipeline, all of the Israelis were quickly released. (“Nuclear plants tighten security FBI seeking 6 men seen in Midwest,” The Miami Herald, Oct. 31, 2001.) In May of 2002, two Israeli nationals posing as “furniture movers” were stopped by military police in Oak Harbor, Washington, near the Whidbey Island Naval Air Station. Police searched their vehicle and, according to Fox News, a “bomb-sniffing dog first detected explosives on one of the men and inside the truck.” High-tech equipment “was used later to confirm the presence of TNT and RDX plastic explosive.” (Carl Cameron, “Police Seize Rental Truck With TNT Traces,” Fox News, May 13, 2002.)Fox News also acknowledged that “Government officials said the roadside stop was so close to the naval air station that military personnel took part in the initial arrest and naval intelligence has also been involved in the subsequent investigation.” (Ibid.) Were these two Israelis planning an attack on the Whidby Naval Air Station? And did they intend to have it blamed on Muslims to perpetuate the myth of the ‘Al-Qaeda terror network’? That is a real possibility, but this event too was quickly hushed up. 

Since 9/11 there have been a number of large-scale terrorist attacks in different nations across Europe, Asia and the Middle East. All of these bombings were designed to drag other countries into Israel’s proxy wars against the Islamic world. It is beyond the scope of this book to analyze all of these attacks in depth. However, I suspect that the twin train bombings in Madrid, Spain in 2004 and London, England in 2005 were Israeli-engineered atrocities, bearing all of the traditional hallmarks of Mossad involvement. The coordination and sophistication of these attacks certainly required the expertise of an intelligence agency and military professionals. Like 9/11, these attacks were officially blamed on ‘Al-Qaeda’-affiliated Muslims as is usually the case with false-flag ops committed by the Mossad. The evidence, however, leads us to Israel’s doorstep in both cases. I believe a legitimate investigation into these events would reveal Israeli guilt and complicity. An extensive report put out by the Take Our World Back website entitled “A Comprehensive History of Zionist Crimes”  provides a detailed analysis of the evidence which shows that those two attacks, among other less prominent acts of terror, were the handiwork of Israel’s Mossad with the help of pro-Zionist forces in the CIA, MI6 and other corrupt intelligence agencies.

CHAPTER TEN 

The Anthrax Letters: 

A Zionist Scare Tactic 

To further ensnare Americans into a submissive state of abject fear and paranoia, the Zionist organizers of 9/11 cleverly created the “Anthrax scare” shortly after their assault on the Twin Towers. In a diabolical effort to terrorize and traumatize the American public into acquiescing to the Zionist agenda in the Middle East, Israel unleashed a biological attack against the people of America. 

One week after the September 11 attacks, beginning on the 18th of the month, several letters containing a deadly strain of weaponized Anthrax spores showed up in the mail of news media offices and two Democratic U.S. Senators, killing five people and infecting 17 others. On the first day of the Anthrax onslaught the Jewish-owned press promoted a series of lies intended to implicate Iraq and Al-Qaeda as the culprits behind the mailings. Reports surfaced in the mainstream media alleging that five months before 9/11 Mohammad Atta had met with an Iraqi official named Ahmed al-Ani in Prague wherein Atta was given a “flask of Anthrax.” (Daniel McGrory, “Hijacker ‘Given Anthrax Flask By Iraqi Agent’,” London Times, Oct. 28, 2001.) The original claim about this supposed meeting between Atta and al-Ani and the transfer of a vial of Anthrax was based entirely on the spurious, less-than-reputable word of the Israeli Mossad. (Ibid.) This invention of Zionist propaganda was picked up and spread by Jewish neocon commentators and top Bush administration officials in a deceitful campaign to frame Al-Qaeda and Iraq for the Anthrax mailings. (“Bush Administration Claims vs. The Facts,” Leading To War Website)  Czech intelligence officials originally went along with this fallacious story, but later acknowledged that it could not be corroborated. In August 2002, Czech foreign intelligence Chief František Bublan publicly backed away from the claim that Atta met al-Ani, saying that rumors of such meetings “have not been verified or proven.” (Kate Swoger, “Intelligence chief casts doubt on Atta meeting,” Prague Post, July 15, 2002.) The Prague Post reported that “Bublan said that promoting a so-called ‘Prague connection’ between Atta and al-Ani might have been a ploy by U.S. policymakers seeking justifications for a new military action against Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein.” (Ibid.) 

The Anthrax spores used in the mailings were of an extremely rare quality that is only produced in the United States. So where did it originate from? The strain of weaponized Anthrax used in the attacks, known as the “Ames strain,” narrowed the search for the perpetrators down to a few U.S. labs. (“Army Working on Weapons-Grade Anthrax,” Washington Post, Dec. 13, 2001.)  Eventually it was traced back to an American biowarfare lab called the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute for Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) in Fort Detrick, Maryland, proving the Anthrax attacks were an “inside job.” Since neither ‘Al Qaeda’ nor Iraq could possibly have managed to smuggle Anthrax spores out of this American military lab, the story abruptly changed and all mention of Al-Qaeda and Iraq quietly disappeared down the rabbit hole. Now all eyes were focused on an insider within the U.S. biodefense establishment named Bruce E. Ivins. A White Christian scientist, Ivins doesn’t exactly fit the stereotyped profile of a violent, deranged terrorist. From the outset of the FBI campaign to label Ivins as the lone culprit, many journalists and other commentators began to raise serious doubts about the FBI’s narrative. The FBI’s own genetic consultant Claire FraserLigget stated that the failure of authorities to find any Anthrax spores in Ivins’ house, vehicle or on any of his belongings seriously undermined the case. (“The Anthrax Files,” Frontline PBS)

Most of Ivins’ colleagues at the Fort Detrick lab were doubtful of his involvement from the beginning. Jeffrey Adamovicz, one of Ivins’s supervisors in USAMRIID’s bacteriology division, stated, “I’d say the vast majority of people [at Fort Detrick] think he had nothing to do with it.” (Michael Isikoff, “The Case Still Isn’t Closed,” Newsweek Magazine, Aug. 8, 2008.) Dr. Meryl Nass, a former colleague of Ivins, documented the farcical basis of the FBI’s case against Ivins. She pointed out that the FBI could not place Ivins in New Jersey on the dates that the letters were mailed, and that he was only one of one hundred employees in the USAMRIID lab who could have potentially handled the type of Anthrax used in the mailings. (“Beyond a Reasonable Doubt?,” Anthrax Vaccine Blogspot, Aug. 6, 2008.) Henry Heine, a microbiologist who worked with Ivins for years at USAMRIID, testified to the U.S. National Research Council about the Anthrax attacks. Heine told the panel that it was impossible for the deadly spores to have been produced undetected in Ivins’s laboratory, as the FBI maintains. He testified that it would have taken a year of intensive work to produce the high quantity of Anthrax spores used in the letters and that this type of work would not have escaped the attention of his co-workers at the facility. No other scientists or lab technicians reported any anomalies regarding Ivins’ work leading up to the attacks. Furthermore, Heine asserted that where Ivins worked biological containment measures were inadequate to prevent the Anthrax spores from floating out of the laboratory into animal cages and offices, resulting in the deaths of animals and people, which did not happen.  (Scott Shane, “Colleague Disputes Case Against Anthrax Suspect,” New York Times, Apr. 22, 2010.)

Despite the fact that the FBI failed to produce any credible evidence linking Ivins to the Anthrax mail attack, they ferociously pursued him as the lone suspect. As the FBI readied an indictment against Ivins, he allegedly took his own life by overdosing on Tylenol at the Frederick Memorial Hospital in Maryland on the 29th of July, 2008. (“Anthrax scientist commits suicide as FBI closes in,” Associated Press, Aug. 1, 2008.) Bruce Ivins’ attorney said his client’s death was the result of the government’s “relentless pressure of accusation and innuendo.” (Ibid.) Journalist Glenn Greenwald opined that “Ivins’ death meant that the FBI’s allegations would never be tested in a court of law.” ” (“Serious doubt cast on FBI’s anthrax case against Bruce Ivins,”  Salon, Feb. 16, 2011.) Indeed, Ivins’ untimely death conveniently saved the FBI from an embarrassing time in court trying to prove a case that they knew they could not make. No formal charges were ever actually filed against Ivins for the Anthrax crime for the simple reason that no evidence of his guilt ever existed. He served as another scapegoat for Zion. 

In any case, even if we presuppose for hypothetical purposes that the allegations against Ivins were true, what would have been his motive to do this? What would he have to gain? Absolutely nothing. It is, however, interesting to note that as an evangelical Christian, Ivins was a philosemite who believed that Jews are “God’s chosen people.” The Frederick (Md.) News Post republished letters from Ivins in the wake of his suicide. In one letter he praises a rabbi for refusing to engage in dialogue with a Muslim cleric, expressing his Zionist supremacist view that, “By blood and faith, Jews are God’s chosen, and have no need for ‘dialogue’ with any gentile.”  (“Ivins believed Jews were God’s chosen,” Jewish Telegraphic Agency, Aug. 4, 2008.)

There is another glaring problem with the Bruce Ivins ‘lone nut’ narrative. The letters that accompanied the Anthrax were written to appear as if the authors were Arab Muslims plotting revenge against America and Israel. Some of the letters read: “Death to America. Death to Israel. Allah is Great.” If Ivins was behind the Anthrax mailings, why did he try to make it appear as though the letters and thus the Anthrax assault itself was the work of Muslims? Did he dislike Muslims so much as to risk his career and his very life to frame them for an act of bioterrorism? With no known history of anti-Arab or antiMuslim prejudice, it seems highly improbable that Ivins would resort to such extreme criminality just to give Muslims a bad name. The official story acknowledges that no Arab or Muslim took part in this crime — so what are we to make of these fake letters and the person(s) responsible for their creation? It should be exceedingly obvious by now that whoever was actually behind the Anthrax attacks had a precise agenda aimed at having Muslims blamed for terrorism against the U.S. to facilitate a political end, such as a war against Iraq, Afghanistan and other Muslim nations in the Middle East. Mike Rivero explained that, 

“In short, the entire look of the letters is a contrived fake, creating what they thought a letter from a third world middle eastern terrorist would look like, so that the phrases “Death to Israel”, and “Allah is Great” (a real Muslin says either “Allah Achbar” or “God is Great”) would point the finger of blame for the Anthrax at the middle eastern Arabs. Except that we know for a fact that the Anthrax didn’t come from the Middle East. It isn’t Saddam’s or Osama’s, it’s the very best high quality mil-spec Anthrax home grown at Fort Detrick, Dugway, and USAMRIID. It’s our Anthrax. And that means that all the slanted writing, the extra crossings on the  “T”s, the references to Allah and Israel are a carefully crafted hoax, designed to trick Americans into thinking that Arab Muslims from the middle east were to blame for the Anthrax letters. The above letters are not evidence of a terrorist attack but of a deception against the people of the United States; a deliberate frameup of middle eastern Arabs perpetrated by the same party who owns the Anthrax. That a plan exists to frame Arab Muslims for the crimes of another party is now a proven fact.”  (“The 9/11 Anthrax Frame-Up,” What Really Happened)

Aligned perfectly with the modus operandi of the Mossad, the Anthrax episode appears to be just another component of a broader Zionist deception. To unravel this mystery we have to take a look at a man named Philip M. Zack, a microbiologist and Lieutenant Colonel in the U.S. Army. Zack worked as a biowarfare researcher at the Fort Detrick complex where Ivins also worked. Dr. Zack was having an affair with another employee of USAMRIID named Dr. Mariam Rippy. In the early 1990s, the pair were embroiled in a scandal involving the harassment of another scientist at the Fort Detrick lab, named Dr. Ayaad Assaad. An Egyptian-American, Assaad was the victim of racial harassment from Zack, Rippy and others who formed a clique within the lab called “the Camel Club,” with the explicit intent to torment and verbally abuse Dr. Assaad. In 1991, Assaad discovered an eight page poem in his mailbox written by Zack and his cohorts which mocked Assaad’s Arabic heritage and made lewd references to a “rubber camel.” The Hartford Courant ran a story which noted: 

“Assaad said he was working on the Saturday before Easter 1991 when he discovered an eight-page poem in his mailbox. The poem, which became a court exhibit, has 235 lines, many of them lewd, mocking Assaad. The poem also refers to another creation of the scientists who wrote it — a rubber camel outfitted with sexually explicit appendages. The poem reads: “In (Assaad’s) honor we created this beast; it represents life lower than yeast.” The camel, it notes, each week will be given “to who did the least.” The poem also doubles as an ode to each of the participants who adorned the camel, who number at least six and referred to themselves as “the camel club.” Two — Dr. Philip Zack and Dr. Marian Rippy — voluntarily left Fort Detrick soon after Assaad brought the poem to the attention of supervisors.” (“Arab scientists recount hostility and harassment at military anthrax lab,” The Hartford Courant, Dec. 19, 2001.)

In December 1991 Philip Zack left Fort Detrick. Shortly thereafter, 27 specimens, including Anthrax, Ebola and the hantavirus, disappeared from the lab.  (“Anthrax Missing From Army Lab,” The Hartford Courant, Jan. 20, 2002.) A 1992 inquiry into the incident uncovered that suspicious individuals had continuously entered the lab late at night to conduct unauthorized research involving Anthrax. (Ibid.) Two former scientists there told reporters that it wouldn’t have been particularly difficult for someone with a security clearance to smuggle specimens out of the lab. The Hartford Courant reported: 

“Dr. Mary Beth Downs told investigators that she had come to work several times in January and February of 1992 to find that someone had been in the lab at odd hours, clumsily using the sophisticated electron microscope to conduct some kind of off-the-books research. After one weekend in February, Downs discovered that  someone had been in the lab using the microscope to take photos of slides, and apparently had forgotten to reset a feature on the microscope that imprints each photo with a label. After taking a few pictures of her own slides that morning, Downs was surprised to see “Antrax 005″ emblazoned on her negatives.” (Ibid.) 

Documents from the inquiry into the disappearance of specimens at the facility — including Anthrax — revealed that on the night of January 23, 1992, a security camera recorded Philip Zack, who was no longer working there at the time, being let into the lab by his mistress Dr. Marian Rippy. Zack apparently made routine unauthorized visits to the lab to reminisce with his former colleagues, and possibly to engage in more sinister activities. (Ibid.) A few days after 9/11, before the Anthrax-tainted letters started to arrive in people’s mail, an anonymous letter was written and mailed to the FBI which falsely accused Dr. Ayaad Assaad of being “a potential biological terrorist.” The writer of the letter claimed to have worked with Assaad and “heard him say that he has a vendetta against the U.S. government and that if anything happens to him, he told his sons to carry on.” The letter went on to urge the FBI to stop him.  (Laura Rozen, “Fort Detrick’s anthrax mystery,” Salon, Jan. 26, 2002.)

On October 2, 2001, Assaad was called in for an interview with the FBI, who then proceeded to question him about the accusations made against him in the anonymous letter. According to Assaad’s testimony, only a former co-worker of his could have been privy to the personal information about him that was detailed in the letter. The FBI quickly cleared Assaad of the accusation that he could be a bio-terrorist, but showed little interest in talking with him further or in finding out who sent them the erroneous letter to begin with. Assaad was left puzzled by this, seeing as the letter turned out to be incredibly self-incriminating because it revealed an eerie foreknowledge of the imminent Anthrax attacks. The timing of the letter makes it quite apparent that whoever was behind the attempt to frame Assaad, was actually behind the Anthrax-tainted letters that turned up in the mail a short time later. “The whole world wants to talk to me, except the FBI… Something’s wrong here,” Assaad told the online publication Salon. (Ibid.) Assaad and his attorney Rosemary A. McDermott believe there is a very close connection between the unsigned letter accusing him of being a bio-terrorist and the person who actually sent the Anthrax to two U.S. Democratic Senators, NBC’s Tom Brokaw and others. Ms. McDermott said, “The person who wrote that letter knew intimate details of my client’s life and his professional history, and about the Fort Detrick operation. I don’t think that is a coincidence.” Assaad posited his own theory about the attempt to frame him, suggesting that his Arab background and expertise in biological and chemical agents made him the “perfect scapegoat.” (Ibid.) Assaad strongly suspected that whoever wrote and mailed the letter to the FBI knew in advance what was going to happen and created “a suitable, well-fitted scapegoat for this action.” (Justin Raimondo, “Cold Case,” The American Conservative, Sept. 25, 2006.) 

Why was the FBI so reluctant to pursue this huge lead in the Anthrax investigation? The malicious author of the frame-up letter was a former colleague of Dr. Assaad who harbored a huge grudge against him. The only person who fits that description better than anyone else is Lt. Col. Philip Zack, the anti-Arab bully who tormented Assaad at the Fort Detrick lab in the early 1990s. The same lab where Zack was caught on a security camera making unauthorized visits late at night shortly before Anthrax spores had gone missing in 1992. The same lab where Bruce E. Ivins, the Anthrax patsy who allegedly committed suicide, also worked. The same lab where 100 the Anthrax spores used in the letters originated from. It really is an open and shut case. The real reason that the FBI refused to track down Philip Zack and question him about his very guilty and incriminating pattern of behavior surrounding Anthrax, Dr. Assaad and the Fort Detrick biowarfare lab, is because he is Jewish. And judging by his vicious anti-Arab racism, he appears to be a radical pro-Israel Zionist, a terrorist sayan for the Mossad. (Hector Carreon, “FBI Closes in on Anthrax Terrorist: Prime Suspect is a Zionist,” La Vox De Atzlan, Feb. 26, 2002.) Commenting on the debacle surrounding Dr. Assaad, Le Vox De Atzlan opined that the USAMRIID lab had been overtaken in the early 1990's by a rogue network of Jewish-Zionist conspirators led by Lt. Col. Philip Zack, who were endeavoring to steal Anthrax from the lab to use in a biological attack and have it blamed on Arabs. Hector Carreon explained: 

“The racist and bigoted attacks on Dr. Ayaad Assaad by Zionist Philip Zack and others started while he worked at the Army’s bioweapons lab at Fort Detrick in Maryland during the 1990′s. This is when a vicious racist vendetta was launched against the scientist of Arab descent. A group of coworkers led by then Army Lt. Col. Philip Zack began a hateful campaign to harass and get Dr. Assaad fired from his duties. The Zionists apparently wanted to get rid of anyone that could uncover their sinister plans which consisted in stealing “weapons grade anthrax” and other deadly viruses used in biological weapons.” (Ibid.) 

Although it cannot be proven for certain that Philip Zack personally sealed and mailed the Anthrax letters, the circumstantial evidence surrounding Dr. Zack, Dr. Assad, USAMRIID and the anonymous frame-up letter sent to the FBI that was designed to implicate Assaad in the soonto-happen Anthrax attacks, paints a convincing picture that Lt. Col. Philip Zack is the guilty party behind all of this chaos and subversion. All of the facts of the case have yet to be uncovered, due to the deliberate failure of the FBI to properly investigate the matter, but the evidences compiled here form a narrative that certainly makes a lot more sense than the bizarre Bruce Ivins storyline. The initial propaganda had it that Al-Qaeda and Iraq were behind the Anthrax attack. When that flimsy narrative fell apart the real perpetrators needed a scapegoat to take the fall, which is why Bruce Ivins’ alleged suicide proved to be a godsend for the FBI and their cover-up of what really happened. A clear pattern of Federal protection of Dr. Zack leads me to believe that he was part of a covert Mossad operation to orchestrate the Anthrax terror scare. Beholden to Jewish power, the FBI has shown itself to be nothing more than a corrupt conduit of the Zionist Lobby in America, routinely ditching extremely substantial clues that lead to Jewish, Zionist and Israeli suspects, while relentlessly pursuing phony leads that cast suspicion upon Arab and Muslim patsies. If Zack had been properly investigated and shown to be the criminal mastermind behind the Anthrax attacks, the entire facade of Israeli deceit behind 9/11 itself would have come crashing down. The Jewish overseers of the American government and media establishment simply could not let that happen, and did everything in their power to prevent it. 

In addition to propping up Jewish war propaganda to justify the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan and a war against the entire Muslim world, the second underlying motive behind the Anthrax terror scare was to intimidate the U.S. Congress into rubber-stamping the war agenda in the Middle East and the erosion of civil liberties on the home front through the U.S. “Patriot Act,” which was introduced in Congress on the 2nd of October, 2001. The Bush administration pressed 101 the Congress to pass the freedom-killing “anti-terror” legislation within a one week timeframe but encountered obstacles in two Democratic Senators, Tom Daschle (the Senate Majority Leader) and Patrick Leahy. Anthony York of Salon noted that Patrick Leahy, the Senator from Vermont, was “one of the president’s most outspoken critics since Sept. 11, as the administration has moved aggressively to curtail civil liberties in its war on terrorism.” (“Why Daschle and Leahy?,” Salon, Nov. 22, 2001.) Daschle, as Senate Majority Leader, was in a key position to block or slow the passage of the Patriot Act, and was intent on doing so until certain events transpired that changed his mind, namely, the Anthrax attacks. It just so happens that both Daschle and Leahy were both personally targeted by the Anthrax mail terrorist, although both managed to avoid being harmed. The Anthrax hysteria resulted in the hurried passage of the Patriot Act through Congress. Most Congressmen did not even read the legislation before signing it into law, fearing another 9/11 or more Anthrax letters. 

The LA Times made the honest observation that, “The anthrax attacks, coming on the heels of Sept. 11, had enduring effects. They deepened fears of terrorism and helped advocates of a U.S. invasion of Iraq make their case to Congress and the public. They prompted an expensive and risky expansion of federally funded biodefense laboratories.” (“The anthrax killings: A troubled mind,” Los Angeles Times, May 29, 2011.) Glenn Greenwald, writing for Salon, noted the significance of the Anthrax scare to benefit the Bush administration’s “War on Terror” crusade and their desire for unlimited defense spending, stating: 

“It is hard to overstate the political significance of the anthrax attacks. For reasons I’ve described at length, that event played at least as much of a role as the 9/11 attacks in elevating the Terrorism fear levels which, through today, sustain endless wars, massive defense and homeland security budgets, and relentless civil liberties erosion's. … in essence, it was anthrax that convinced large numbers of Americans that Terrorism was something that could show up without warning at their doorstep — though something as innocuous as their mailbox — in the form of James-Bond like attacks featuring invisible, lethal powder. 

Moreover, anthrax was exploited in the aftermath of 9/11 to ratchet up the fear levels toward Saddam Hussein, as ABC News‘ Brian Ross spent a full week screeching to the country — falsely – that bentonite had been found in the anthrax and that this agent was the telltale sign of Iraq’s chemical weapons program, while George Bush throughout 2002 routinely featured “anthrax” as one of Saddam’s scary weapons.” (“Serious doubt cast on FBI’s anthrax case against Bruce Ivins,” Salon, Feb. 16, 2011.)

Much like 9/11 itself, the only beneficiaries of the Anthrax attacks were Israel, the U.S. Federal government and the out-of-control U.S. defense establishment. The people who benefited least of all from the event were Arabs and Muslims who have been on the receiving end of U.S. depleted uranium bombs; and Bruce Ivins, who ended up dead in a hospital with too much Tylenol in his stomach. Evidence that some top officials in the White House may have had foreknowledge of the Anthrax attacks came to the surface in October of 2001. On the night of the September 11 attacks, the White House dispensed an antibiotic known as Cipro to its staff. This drug is  effective in combating the Anthrax virus. Sandra Sobieraj, a writer for the Associated Press, reported: 

“On the night of the Sept. 11 attacks, the White House Medical Office dispensed Cipro to staff accompanying Vice President Dick Cheney as he was secreted off to the safety of Camp David, and told them it was “a precaution,” according to one person directly involved. At that time, nobody could guess the dimensions of the terrorists’ plot.” (“White House Mail Machine Has Anthrax,” Washington Post, Oct. 23, 2001.)

How did the White House know to give out this drug a full month before any trace of Anthrax turned up in Washington? Were they tipped off? Indeed they were, according to the Winter Patriot Blog, which reported that “on September 11, 2001, Jerome Hauer advised the White House to begin taking Cipro, an antibiotic which is effective against anthrax.” (“Meet Jerome Hauer, 9/11 Suspect Awaiting Indictment,” Winter Patriot Blogspot, Feb. 26, 2007.) We should have another look at this slimy character. As a national security adviser of the National Institute of Health (NIH), Jerome Hauer directed that organization’s response to the Anthrax scare, and was thus in a prime position to know what was really going on throughout the duration of the biological terror campaign. Why did Hauer tell the White House staff to take Cipro if he wasn’t aware that something bad was about to happen involving Anthrax? The Winter Patriot explained further: 

“Jerome Hauer received relatively good information for tracking down the origin of the anthrax. He even got a list of people from various institutes, including USAMRIID at Fort Detrick. But his response was slow and hidden behind a public relations campaign spreading Orwellian claims like “Suspects are Osama bin Laden and his Al-Q’aeda network and sympathizers to US right wing extremists”. Why would he act so slowly, and in such an inappropriate fashion? Perhaps because Jerome Hauer knew someone whose name was on that list? Stephen Hatfill, at one time considered a prime suspect in this still-unsolved case, had worked for USAMRIID at Fort Detrick. Strangely, perhaps, he had also worked with Jerome Hauer, for Scientific Applications International Corporation, at the Center for Counter terrorism Technology and Analysis.” (Ibid.) 

Hauer’s hands just keep getting dirtier and dirtier. He has had a long career as a specialist in the field of bio-chemicals, bio-weapons and infectious diseases. (“Who is Jerome “Jerry” Hauer?”, 911 Omission Report Website, Mar. 13, 2004.)In the early 1990's, Hauer participated in the Johns Hopkins Working Group on Civilian Bio Defense, where he wrote various articles about a possible bioterrorist attack. In 1998, he lobbied Rudy Giuliani to develop a vaccine for the West Nile virus a year before the virus broke out in New York, upon which he subsequently spearheaded the West Nile spraying operation in NYC. He routinely gives lectures about bioterrorism and writes scripts envisioning terror events that cause mass causalities and mass panic. He has participated in and organized all kinds of bioterror “drills” and “war games.” In 1999 he put together a conference in New York for journalists and leading bioterrorism ‘thinkers’ which he named “Reporting on Weapons of Mass Destruction – Responsibility, Reliability, Readiness.” On November 6, 2001, Hauer took part in the “Independent Task Force  on America’s Response to Terrorism” at the Jewish-run Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). He contributed to a paper that was produced by the group entitled “Improving the US Public Diplomacy In the War Against Terrorism”. Their agenda, eight weeks after the 9/11 attacks, included the following sinister objectives:  

-Release a White Paper explaining our goals and rationale for the war in Afghanistan, and outlining the evidence that the al-Qaeda network was responsible for the 9/11 attacks. 

-Disseminate stories of particular victims to convey the range of people killed in the 9/11 attacks — stress range of religions, races, income levels, etc. 

-Counteract myth that Mossad was behind the attacks by showing Jews killed, etc. 

-Routinely monitor the regional press in real time to enable prompt responses. 

As this report shows, Hauer and his Jewish elitist friends immediately mobilized to push their agenda of war against the Islamic world and to suppress the truth about Mossad's hand behind most of this monstrous malfeasance. Hauer positioned himself into multiple influential posts to coordinate the attacks and the response to them. He was a top official of Rudy Giuliani's "Office of Emergency Management" in NYC, the director of the NIH response to the Anthrax attacks, a close confidant of Larry Silverstein, a managing director of Kroll Associates (the WTC's security company), and made guest appearances on TV spewing Orwellian propaganda that "fires and jet fuel" caused the collapse of the Twin Towers and that Al-Qaeda was responsible for 9/11. Hauer, a Zionist Jew born and raised, is supremely guilty of terrorist crimes and treason against the American people. When and where will he be put on trial for this unspeakable evil? 

The 9/11 attacks and the Anthrax terror scare were part of the same covert operation. This foreboding conspiracy to terrorize the people of America into a paranoid state of paralyzing fear and helplessness was spearheaded by a terrorist network of Zionist Jews. All of the known facts collectively point in the direction of Israel, the Mossad and their helpers in America. The purpose and intent of this pernicious plot boils down to one thing: the Zionist quest to conquer the Middle East and have the ‘goyim’ do the dirty work. Israel’s leaders have the audacity to call their rogue nation ‘America’s greatest friend.’ That begs the question: with friends like Israel, who needs enemies?

next

The Cover-Up: Zionist Insiders in Key Positions

FAIR USE NOTICE

THIS SITE CONTAINS COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL THE USE OF WHICH HAS NOT ALWAYS BEEN SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED BY THE COPYRIGHT OWNER. AS A JOURNALIST, I AM MAKING SUCH MATERIAL AVAILABLE IN MY EFFORTS TO ADVANCE UNDERSTANDING OF ARTISTIC, CULTURAL, HISTORIC, RELIGIOUS AND POLITICAL ISSUES. I BELIEVE THIS CONSTITUTES A 'FAIR USE' OF ANY SUCH COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL AS PROVIDED FOR IN SECTION 107 OF THE US COPYRIGHT LAW.

IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107, THE MATERIAL ON THIS SITE IS DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PROFIT TO THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED A PRIOR INTEREST IN RECEIVING THE INCLUDED INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL CAN BE REMOVED ON THE REQUEST OF THE OWNER.