PART 2 OF 2:HITLER'S GENEALOGY

Hitler's Genealogy

 

by Miles Mathis

So let's move on to Rudolph Hess. This is also ridiculously easy. His maternal grandmother is listed at Geni as Adelheid Ferber. Ferber is a Jewish name. See famous author Edna Ferber, admitted to be Jewish. She wrote Giant, Cimarron, Show Boat, and so on. Adelheid's mother was a Gladitsch, also probably Jewish. We also find the names Munch, Richter, Hertel, Prohl, and Buhler. Hess was married to Ilsa Prohl, also spelled Proehl. Proehl is Jewish. See Friedrich Gutmann's  Wiki page, where we find he was head of Proehl and Gutmann, a large bank in Amsterdam, after WW1. He was also a major art collector. His father had founded the massive Dresdner Bank, and the family was Jewish. Although he was a claimed convert (at Wiki we are told his father Eugen had converted from Judaism), he was allegedly murdered at Theresienstadt by the Nazis for being a rich Jew, although we should now find that suspicious. We will have to unwind it another time. 

Notice the name Hertel. It should probably be Herzl, which we already saw above. This would mean Hess was related to Theodore Herzl, which is not at all surprising. Herzl's genealogy doesn't go back that far [1745], but in another coincidence, Hess' Hertel is named Johanne Hertel. 

Herzl's wife was named Johanne Herzl. What about the name Richter? Jewish again. A search on this raises some hackles, with people chiming in to scream Sviatoslav Richter wasn't Jewish, and so on. But he was. Just go to his Geni pages, and find his maternal grandmother. She has no ancestry herself, but they do tell you she was a Reinke. That is Jewish. See here. What about Gerhard Richter? Also Jewish. Richter was a protege of Heinz Lohmar, Jew and Communist. Richter's mother is a Schonfelder and his wife is a Moritz. His ex-wife is a Genzken. See Erich Schonfelder, co-screenwriter with Ernst Lubitsch. Lubitsch admitted he was Jewish. As you search on it, also include Schoenfelder, Schoenfeld, and Schonfeld. As for Moritz, see billionaire Michael Moritz, number one venture capitalist in the world in 2006-7 according to Forbes. He is from Wales and is Jewish. 

We should also remember that Moses Hess, who we saw above, is also known as Moritz Hess. We should also think of Ernst Moritz Hess an allegedly baptized German Jew who commanded Hitler's regiment in W.W.1. Although allegedly squashed during W.W.2, he was a judge before and after Hitler's rise, and later became a very wealthy railroad tycoon. He was President of the German Federal Railways Authority by 1949. That's very curious, and deserves a later look. We are told his mother was Jewish, but we aren't told her name at any of about 50 sites. 

How about the name Genzken? Also probably Jewish. 

That is Isa Genzken, ex-wife of Gerhard Richter. In fact, this name ties neatly into this paper, since the alleged head of the medical service of the Waffen SS was Karl Genzken. He was accused in the Medical Trial after the war. Curiously, although he was found guilty of horrific crimes—including mass human experimentation and many murders—and sentenced to life in prison, his sentence was later reduced to 20 years. He only served six (if any). No biographical information is given for him at Wiki or any other place. I also found no biographical information on Isa Genzken. 

So, am I claiming that everyone with all these German names is actually Jewish? No, not anymore than I am claiming that everyone in the US with the name Jones or Morris is a crypto-Jew from the major lines. I am simply pointing out that in cases where we already have an avalanche of red flags all pointing in the same direction, we should assume these names like Richter and Hess are Jewish. When the mainstream assures they aren't, we shouldn't take their word for it. We should do our own research, and not pass over any clues. That is all I am doing. Like Sherlock Holmes, I am combing the ground for clues with a magnifying glass, and I am not letting myself be diverted when passersby assure me the signs don't mean anything. I will decide what they likely mean by weighing what I find, and by no other method. 

What about other famous Richters? Andy Richter? Well, his Geni page is ridiculously scrubbed and might as well be white. But we again get the old adopted dodge. That is red flag number one. Geni tells us he was adopted, Wiki doesn't. His mother is née Palmer, red flag number two. His dad taught Russian and later came out as gay, red flags three and four. Richter's Geni page is managed by a Schoenberg: red flag number 5.

What about physicist Burton Richter?  Oh, nice, he is admitted to be Jewish. His mother was Fanny Pollack, which ties into our research above. 

What about the artist Gustav Richter, who painted Emperor William I? Well, his wife was Cornelie Meyerbeer. She was admitted to be Jewish, being the daughter of opera composer Jacob Liebmann Beer, later Giocomo Meyerbeer. Richter's lines are otherwise scrubbed, although his sister married a Kraus. That is very often Jewish. 

What about writer and publisher Milan Richter? Admitted to be Jewish. 

What about Argentine “scientist” Ronald Richter? He was from Austria and apparently his education is unsubstantiated. Richter was called to Argentina by German industrialist and ex-Nazi spy August Siebrecht. Richter was hired by Juan Peron personally for government projects, although we are told Peron had to override Argentine law to do so. What? What law was that? Was that a law against fleeing Nazis or fleeing Jews? Either way, it is a problem here. Peron wanted him to work on an atomic project, we are told. Wiki admits he faked his work there, which is not surprising: we have found that all atomic work is a cover for something else. So all signs point to Richter being Jewish. 

They also point to Juan Peron being Jewish. Check out his Geni pages. Despite being President of Argentina for over nine years, he has almost no bio in several lines. His maternal line is scrubbed past his grandfather Juan Sosa. His paternal line is even stranger: his great-grandmother is listed as Ann Hughes MacKenzie of London, daughter of Steven Hughes and Elizabeth MacKenzie. But of course if those are her parents, she wasn't a MacKenzie, and the name is wrong. But the punch is in Peron's maternal line, of course. His great-grandmother in the main maternal line is given as Victoria Pinero. That's Jewish. See the Jewish Encyclopedia, where we find Arthur Wing Pinero,  English dramatist who worked with Henry Irving! He is admitted there to be Sephardic. He married a Moore. Wiki admits Pinero was Jewish through his paternal grandfather. . . who would have also been named Pinero. The Jewish Encyclopedia admits the name was originally Pinheiro, so we should search on that. At the University of Minnesota we find that the Jewish family Pinheiro was prominent on Nevis and Barbados for nearly 150 years. It is interesting to find Barbados here, since of course we found Samuel Parris of the Salem Witch Trials came from there at the same time. Before that the Pinheiros were from Madrid and Amsterdam. Also see here. Also here, where we learn of the Pinheiro's involvement in the slave trade in the early 1700's. 

Also notice that the name Peron is a slur of Pinero. Just move the “n” to the end, and Pinero becomes Pieron. But Peron is supposed to come from the paternal line while Pinero comes from the maternal line. This indicates Peron's parents were cousins.

Surprisingly, the name Sosa may also be Jewish. JewornotJew.com, run by Jews, admits it. We have Gaspar Castano de Sosa, called a borderline Jew, but admitted to be a slaver and Jew and friend of slaver and Jew Luis de Carabajal. Also Mercedes Sosa ,singing at this link in Hebrew during a visit to Israel. The mainstream admits she was a Peroniste, but does not admit she was Jewish. Also does not admit she was probably related to the Perons. The Perons were Sosas, as we just saw at Geni. There was also a Thomas de Sosa denounced as a Jew in Zacatecas, as you see here. Also here, where we find Abraham de Sosa (Souza) as a licensed Jewish merchant in New York. At the same link, we find a Domingo de Sosa a Jewish victim of the Cartagena Inquisition. 

What about Eva Peron? First let's look at Juan Peron's third wife, Maria Martinez. Geni scrubs her past her parents. No grandparents known for this famous person, Presidente of Argentina! As for Eva Peron, her grandfather was a Uhart or Huarte. The line is scrubbed beyond that. Why? Because it is Jewish. See Le Realidad Historia de Espana, 1954, p. 549, where it is admitted. Do you want to guess who wrote it? A Castro. Americo Castro. You will remember that the only mainstream person who admits that Fidel Castro is Jewish is. . . Fidel Castro. Also see Julio Caro Baroja, Los Judios en la Espana Moderna y Contemporanea, vol. 1, 1986, p. 100. 

On her mother's side, Eva Peron is descended from Juan (of Florida) Ponce de Leon. Although it is clearly in her posted genealogy, apparently I am the only one to ever find it. Hit that page and go forward and back to make the link. I Google searched on it and nothing came up. Why? Could be because the de Leons are now admitted to be Jewish in many lines. See the other conquistador Pedro Cieza de Leon, now admitted to be Jewish. His ancestry is scrubbed, but they deny he was related to Ponce. I smell more misdirection, however. “Cieza” just means church, being a Spanish spelling of the Italian “Chiesa”. Why would Pedro be named “Church of Leon”? There are two Cieza towns in Spain, and neither is in Leon. My guess is Pedro's name was changed to scrub his link to Ponce de Leon. In support of that, we find the Ponce de Leons are from Villagarcia de la Torre. Pedro Cieza de Leon was from Llerena. The distance from one place to another is . . . wait for it. . . about 3 miles.

Regarding this question, it is also worth mentioning Daniel de Leon, who we saw in my paper on Eugene Debs. He was a Marxist and one of the founders of American Socialism. He is admitted to be Jewish. So he is probably related to the Perons through Eva's maternal ancestors. This is why they don't mention that Eva is descended from the Ponce de Leons. 

Anyway, this could be why Madonna played Evita. You may think Madonna is Italian, but think again. She was married to Sean Penn, grandson of rabbi Moishe Daniel Pinon.** After that, married to Guy Ritchie,  whose home now has a mikvah—a bath used by Jewish women for ritual cleansing. I'll give you a hint: that has nothing to do with Kabbalah. Kabbalah isn't about mikvah. Gentiles who get into Kabbalah don't install mikvahs in their houses. Besides, the article at that link is from 2013, and Ritchie split with Madonna in 2008. So he didn't do it for her. I'll give you another hint, Ritchie also comes from Stewarts, which indicates the Ritchie name was changed from Rich. Guy Ritchie probably descends from Richard Rich and that lot. He probably has ancestors or current cousins in the peerage. 

Here is Madonna's dad: 

Italian? I don't think so. 

But back to Rudolf Hess. We saw the name Munch in his genealogy. Also probably Jewish. It is admitted, for instance, that most of the patrons of painter Edvard Munch were Jewish and that he was descended from the painter Jacob Munch and historian Peter Andreas Munch. A search on “Jacob Munch genealogy 1776” shows us that his mother was a Krefting and his wife a Barclay. His maternal grandmother was an Arbien. He is also descended from Felbers, which is a variant of Ferber (see above). The Felbers were related to the Helmichs. All those names are Jewish. But perhaps the biggest red flag there is the name Barclay, which obviously isn't Norwegian. We have looked at Barclays Bank before, which was both Quaker and Jewish—the Quaker name hiding the Jewish roots. See my paper on the Quakers The Barclays were big into the slave trade in Jamaica, which links us to others in this paper. Here is an engraving of David Barclay:

That's not really an English nose, is it? I doubt he got it from Norway, either. 

OK, let's move on to Goebbels.

 

Are we there yet? Can I quit? I am feeling a little nauseous. I liked these guys better as evil Nazis than as gay Jewish actors. At least then there was something solid. 

To get us started on this one, I send you to this 2016 article at The Guardian. Goebbels' 105-year-old secretary leads the interview with this: 

The only thing you can say about Goebbels is that he was an outstanding actor. 

They post a video of her, and that quote is used as the subtitle. Wow. I recommend you read that several times, and note the precise wording. She doesn't say that “one thing” you can say about him is that. She says “the only thing”.

She also says this, “He'd trip up the steps like a little Duke”. And, “He probably had a manicure every day”. 

Later, speaking of his performance at Berlin's Sportpalast in 1943, she says, 

No actor could have been any better at the transformation from a civilized, serious person into a ranting, rowdy man. 

So she is sure to tell you twice in this short interview he is an actor. 

She also confirms he had a limp. I think we will need to check the footage for that one: was it a limp or a sashay? 

There's another clue on that page at The Guardian. Notice at the bottom we have four “more on this story” links. The last one is to an article by Roy Greenslade entitled “How Wartime Britons were easily swayed by the Propagandists”. Were they indeed? Sort of like now? 

OK, now for the genealogy. The first thing we find is that Goebbels wife's birth name was Ritschel. I'll give you a second to see what I saw. . . . 

Did you see it? Remember Guy Ritchie? Coincidence, right? I'll bet you dimes to donuts it isn't. My guess is they are both related to the Rich family in the British peerage. They have scrubbed everything around this question, as you can imagine, so it would take a lot of work to prove. Oskar Ritschel is a ghost, which makes it hard. But we do find an Oskar Ritschel, merchant, who came to the US in 1891. Even better, we find a Ritschel on this page for the Frankel family. Other surnames on the page include Meyer-Halevi, Schloss, Guggenheim, Fischl, Brandeis, Wehle, Goldmark, Weisz, Wolf, Spiro, and Dembitz. Oooo, what could it mean? This takes us to the leading rabbis of Prague in the 17th and 18th centuries, some of whom were named Ritschel. But it almost doesn't matter, because Wikipedia now admits Magda Goebbels was adopted by her “stepfather” Richard Friedlander, who was “a Jewish leather goods magnate”. As of this year, they also admit this: 

In 2016, it has been reported that Friedlander may be Madga's biological father. Friedländer's residency card, found in Berlin archives, stated that Magda was his biological daughter.[10] The card was discovered by author Oliver Hilmes [11] 

 Wow. So, either way, Magda's dad was Jewish. Why the recent change in the story? Probably because someone suggested it was better to let the name Friedlander take the fall than the name Ritschel. They wanted to prevent someone from doing what I just did—tying the Ritschels to rabbis in Prague and through them to the Riches of England. 

What about Magda's mother? She is given as a Behrend, but no parents are listed. Also Jewish. See Isaac Behrend Lehmann, a famous Jewish banker who worked for the court of Augustus the Strong II of Saxony. He was also a HaLevi. See also Jeanne Behrend, Jewish pianist, a protege of Josef Hofmann.

 

Also see General Hermann-Heinrich Behrend of the Wehrmacht in W.W.2, not admitted to be Jewish, of course, but we know better. His Wiki page is very curious, since although he was a lieutenant during W.W.1 and a major general in W.W.2, his “career section” only mentions W.W.1. 

Also Genevieve Behrend, another obvious spook. Nothing is known of her early life or her parentage, apparently, although she lived until 1960. I guess her records were destroyed in the San Francisco earthquake or in a fire set off by a flash grenades. She started out as a protege of Mary Baker Eddy, always a red flag. She then switched to Abdul Baha and the Baha'i faith—another big fake, but at least it links her to Israel. That still wasn't spooky enough for her, so she switched to Thomas Troward and Mystic Christianity. He inspired the 2006 movie The Secret, which is damnation enough for any researcher. 

Also Friedrich Jacob Behrend, not admitted to be Jewish at Wiki, but linked to the Jewish Encyclopedia, where he has a listing. Just so you know, the Jewish Encyclopedia is a “descriptive record of. . . the Jewish people”. 

Also photographer Katarina Behrend, admitted to be Jewish here.  

So, basically, every person listed on the Wikipedia page for Behrend. 

It is also worth recalling that  in my recent paper on Mark Twain we found that Magda Goebbels half sister was a woman named Ariane Tebbenjohanns, who came to America and married a spook named Sam Sheppard [not the current actor]. She was the daughter of a wealthy industrialist from Dusseldorf. Who was he? None other than Oskar Ritschel, who we saw above. So her maiden name was not Tebbenjohanns. That must have been her first husband. Regardless, Ariane is admitted to be very wealthy at that last link, which of course means Magda Goebbels was, too. So we may assume Goebbels married her for her money or already had a lot—and probably both. But of course that conflicts with the given bio, which tells us Goebbels' dad Fritz was a factory clerk. How did the son of a factory clerk with five siblings afford to go to university for six years and then marry a wealthy debutante? He married her in 1930, and had done nothing up to that time but work for the Nazis. You don't get rich editing newspapers and giving free speeches for a workers' party. She didn't marry him for his looks. It also wasn't for his power. In 1928, N.S.D.A.P pulled about 2.5% of the vote, sort of like the Green Party now. Do you think officials in the Green Party currently draw beautiful wealthy debutantes to their gatherings? I can tell you by experience: they don't. You will tell me he married her after the elections of 1930, but they met and got engaged before the elections. So the success in those elections couldn't have influenced her. 

As more proof of that, notice that on Goebbels' Wiki page, they call her Magda Quandt. That's pretty strange. Since she was divorced, her name wasn't legally Quandt anymore. That was her ex-husband's name. But they shouldn't have given us that name, either, because it means we can find Ariane's first husband Quandt. Assuming she was a super wealthy deb, we should look for a rich guy born before 1900.

 

That would be Gunther Quandt, b. 1881, whose father Emil Quandt married the daughter of a textile millionaire and took over the company [Reichswolle AG]. So Gunther was 20 years older than Magda. The Quandts supplied the German army with uniforms during WW1. By that time, the Quandts were one of the richest families in Germany: their descendants still make up 8 of the richest 100 Germans. And indeed, we find Magda Goebbels on his page, so my guess was right. His son Herbert became head of AFA, the battery company, which in 1890 was part of Deutsche Bank conglomerate with Siemens AG and AEG. A 2011 report concluded “The Quandts were linked inseparably with the crimes of the Nazis". But we now know that requires a further twist to read it right. What is that twist? 

Before we go any further, I want to be sure you understand what we just uncovered. Joseph Goebbels married Magda Quandt in 1930, when she was 29 and he was 33. Her previous husband was a billionaire, one of the five richest men in Germany—and he was heavily tied to many military contracts. One of his three sons was hers: Harald Quandt. So she remained tied to that family after the divorce. And yet we are supposed to believe Joseph Goebbels was an editor and speaker for a workers' party? This billionaire's ex-wife just happened to marry an up-and-coming speaker in the Workers' Party? Do I need to remind you that workers were the political enemy of the billionaires? The Quants are known to have used slave labor in their factories. See the 2007 German documentary Silence of the Quandts, shown on German public TV station ARD. So the Quandts would not have supported the planks of a workers' party, would they? 

I have shown you much evidence in previous papers of the billionaires infiltrating and blowing workers' parties back to the early 1800's. That is what Marxism was about, and that is what American Socialism was about. Most times, they simply manufactured fake workers' parties as misdirection, and that is what we are seeing here again. N.S.D.A.P was built from the ground up by agents of the billionaires. Like Hitler, Goebbels is a very obvious agent, and I doubt that he was even married to Magda Quandt. The whole thing now looks like theater—as Goebbels' 105-year-old secretary tried to tell us. Magda was playing a part just as much as Joseph, and the children were likely plants as well.

So let's return to the final twist on the Quandts: we just saw the Quandt money came out of textiles. For more, we have to go to the Quandt genealogy. The woman Emil married was a Draeger (Dräger). His son married an Ewald. His grandson married a Bruhn and Brobelt. Other names in that family include Klatten and Wolf. Another grandson married a Bandekow. Their children have these surnames: Geller, Rosenblat, Halterman, and May-Thies. Bruhn is of course just a variation of Braun, which links us back to Eva Braun. Despite several Bruhns being assigned to play anti-Semites in the run-up to the Wars (for example Wilhelm Bruhn), we may assume they were just controlling the opposition. 

To see how the Bruhns really fit into this, go to this page at yadvashem.org on Maria Helena Friedlander (Bruhn). There we learn that Paul Citroen (Jewish) was friends with Henri Friedlander (also Jewish), and that his wife was Maria Helena Bruhn. She pretended to be a Nazi and they still pretend she was a Gentile. She later emigrated to Israel with her husband. Are we given any evidence she wasn't Jewish? No. 

Does she have a genealogy or bio posted? No. Also remember that Rudolph Nureyev's lover was Erik Bruhn, said to be Danish, but his mother was an Evers. That is often Jewish, a variation of Ebers. See Raphael Evers, Rabbi of Rotterdam. That family was also prominent in Amsterdam for centuries, as you see here.  

What about the name Ewald? Also Jewish. See Heinrich Ewald, son of a linen weaver. Wiki doesn't admit he was Jewish, but the Jewish Encyclopedia pretty much does. Also see there listings for Ferdinand Christopher Ewald, who worked for the London Jews Society and founded the Wanderers Home there for Jews. And Johann Ludwig Ewald, German advocate of the Jews. Also H. A. G. Ewald, who wrote a History of Israel. 

What about the Quandt name itself? Where does that come from? The lines are scrubbed, but it is probably a respelling or variation of Kant. The philosopher Immanuel Kant was from Prussia, and his mother was a Reuter. His genealogy is scrubbed. They used to claim his father was from Scotland, but Wikipedia doesn't even bother trying to sell you that hooey anymore. They admit there is no evidence of it, which means the centuries-old claim is a big red flag. But we do get two big clues with Kant. One, he knew Hebrew early on, and changed his name from Emanuel to Immanuel, blowing somewhat his parents' effort to hide his roots. Two, the name Reuter, which is Jewish. See Paul Reuter, founder of Reuter's News Service. Although it is admitted his father was a rabbi, they tell us his mother was a Betty Sanders, and a Gentile. Unlikely. Reuter was born Israel Beer Josephat, which of course links him to opera composer Giocomo Meyerbeer (originally Beer) above. I will be told Josephat changed his name to Reuter, which doesn't necessarily link him to Kant, which is true, but it is curious a Jew would allegedly convert and then change his name to another Jewish name. I suspect it was his mother's name. Geni neither confirms nor denies that, since it gives his mother's maiden name as both Reuther and Seibel. It is impossible to tell what they are telling us there. To discover who the Reuters really were, we have to go back before that, to Kant's time. The Reuters were Reuthers, related to the Ackers. Many Ackers and Ackermans are Jewish. See novelist Kathy Acker. I will be told she was born Lehmann, but her husband Acker was also Jewish. The Lehmann name links her to banker Isaac Behrend Lehmann above. She was a protege of William S. Burroughs and the Black Mountain College spooks, which tells you all you need to know about her. Well, it also helps to know she was born in 1947. Who else? For a general slamdunk, you can visit this page, which lists the Ackers of Eastern Poland. In the front page sampling, all are Jewish.

For more on Reuther, see Walter P. Reuther, union leader not admitted to be Jewish, but Jewish. Just type in “Reuther Jewish” and see all the links he has to Israel, Jewish libraries, and so on. This ties in strongly to our current research, since although he became head of the UAW, Reuther was a Communist at least until 1939, when he was told to switch gears a bit. He came in at the founding of the UAW in 1935, becoming its president almost immediately. For this reason, we can assume he was doing the same thing that Debs had done before him and that Goebbels would do in the same years: infiltrate the labor movement at the behest of the billionaires and blow it from the inside. But I will have to hit Reuthers in a separate paper: he would swamp this one.

So anyway, the point of all that was to show the Quandts were also Jewish, related to the crypto-Jewish Kants before them. I may have more to say about Kant another time as well. 

What about Goebbels himself? He is scrubbed past his father on the paternal side, which is a red flag. His mother was an Odenhausen and his grandmother a Coerver. Here, we find the Odenhausens related to the Cossmanns, Halfmanns and Appels. All Jewish names. How do I know? Because this is a page for Holocaust records from Czechoslovakia. Searching on Coerver, we find an article in the 1976 American Jewish History Quarterly on Neiman-Marcus by author Don Coerver. We find an Anna Coerver at Jweekly.com in 2011 getting Bat Mitzvahed. And so on.

In a previous paper on Lenin, I found that Goebbels was an early protege of Max Freiherr von Waldberg, an admitted Jew who was his teacher in Heidelberg in 1920. They also admit Goebbels was a protege of another teacher, Friedrich Gundolf, also Jewish. Waldberg recommended Wilhelm von Schutz as the subject for Goebbels' PhD thesis, and he went that way. Since Schutz is another composer, that fits in with one of the themes here. This person is scrubbed at all genealogical sites and Wikipedia, but German Wiki tells us his father was a Jacob Schutz, raised to the aristocracy in 1803. This is the same name as a family of painters at the time. What you may not know is that the name was originally Schutzjude, meaning protected Jew. It was later shortened to Schutz (“protected”). It is a common Jewish name to this day. See Israeli writer David Schutz. Also American poet Susan Polis Schutz, admitted to be Jewish. Also physicist Bernard Schutz, probably Jewish since another Bernard Schutz is on the wall at the Holocaust Museum. We find the obit of another Bernard Schutz here at Shalom2.com. We find a Jozef Schutz listed here in the Polish Ghetto in Krakow. And here we find a Mrs. L. Schutz at The Advocate: America's Jewish Journal sandwiched in between a Schiff and a Shabad. Then we have the writer Friedrich Schutz, grandfather of physicist Wolfgang Pauli. This Schutz is listed in Wininger's Great Jewish National-Biography. Pauli himself said he was ¾ Jewish [Physics Today, April 1995, p. 86]. See also Alfred Schutz, banker and philosopher who worked with Husserl. And many others. I think you can see now why Goebbels wrote his dissertation on Schutz. 

In those years we are also told Goebbels was in love with Jewish Else Janke, but that just means she was his beard in college. 

All this is another big problem for the given storytellers, since Goebbels was allegedly already writing anti-Semitic things in these early years. And yet he had no problem with Waldberg, Gundolf, or Janke. Strange. I suggest to you those early writings were faked later to fit the story. 

I have destroyed Goebbels, so let's move on to the last big name I will hit here: Heinrich Himmler. His maternal grandfather was Franz Alois Heyder, so we have that name again. These grandparents are a wall, but we are told the grandmother was a Hofrichter. So we are supposed to believe that the mother of this famous person didn't know who her grandparents were. His paternal grandmother is given as a Kein, otherwise scrubbed. That is probably a fudge of Klein. However, we do find his great-grandfather was a Hettinger, not a Himmler, so once again we have a famous Nazi hiding behind a fake name. It looks like the name Himmler comes from his paternal great-grandmother, but why would that be? Wikipedia has nothing to say about this oddity.

[Added January 25, 2017. Why does that matter? Because it means Himmler should be a Hettinger. They are hiding that for this reason: The ketchup king was H. J. Heinz, as you may know. They admit Donald Trump is related to him fairly closely. A Heinz in his line married a Trump just a few generations back. At about the same time in the Heinz genealogy, we come to a Johann Georg Heinz. He married Anna Henninger, daughter of Nicholaus Henninger. Could they be the same family? If they are, then I will have linked Trump and Heinz to Himmler. In fact, they are linked, as we find at these pages for the Oberst family. Those pages are worth studying, since we find links to many curious surnames, including Lanza. .Remember  Adam Lanza?? We also find Schicks, Ackermans, Görungs (Görings), Hammers, Kaisers, Rudolphs, Zimmermans, Brecht(el)s, Jungs, Barths, Meyers, Webers, Vaughans, Brauns, Vogels, Feils, Hoffmans and Mullers. But the first sign of Henninger we get is when Elisabeth Oberst marries Johann Henninger in 1825 in Unterowisheim, Baden. Both are of that town. In 1849, Susanna Oberst marries Jacob Hettinger of. . . wait for it. . . Unterowisheim, Baden. In 1851, Michael Oberst marries Katarina Henninger, again in Unterowisheim, Baden. In the 1920s, an Olga Obrist marries an Edward Hedinger. I suspect these are all variants of the same name, but even if they aren't, we have just linked the Henningers and Hettingers through the Obersts. They are from the same town in the same years, and are linked to all these obviously Jewish families. To salt that in, we also get the Görings and Brauns and Hoffmanns. Also the Schicks. Hitler's grandmother was a Schicklgruber, remember? So not only have we just linked Trump and Heinz to Himmler, we have linked Himmler to Goring, Braun, and Hitler. It looks like they were all cousins. 

I will be told I have linked some Henningers and Hettingers, but we have no evidence they are the same people. But we do. We just found the Henningers in the Oberst genealogy living in Unterowisheim, Baden. There, they were related to the Mullers. Well, if we go to Heinz' genealogy, we find his Henninger was from Kallstadt. Guess what, Kallstadt is in Baden. Not only that, but it is about 20 miles from Unterowisheim. Both are near Heidelberg, one being about 10 miles NW and one being about 10 miles S. For more, we find Anna Henninger was the wife of Johann Georg Heinz I. His son, Johann Georg Heinz II was married to Anna Muller. We find the same with Himmler's Hettinger family, which was also from Baden. On Himmler's pages, the Hettingers fail, but we can search on Johann Hettinger for more. At these pages,, we find them in Bofsheim in those years, about 20 miles east of Heidelberg.] 

And we get other huge red flags that no one bothers to follow up. Himmler was named Heinrich for his godfather, Prince Heinrich of Bavaria: 

 

From Wiki: 

at Christmas the Himmlers regularly received a visit from the prince and his mother..."[2] 

I'm sorry, am I the first person to ever study history? Has no one ever read these sentences for sense before I got here? Does this guy seem like a logical godfather for the official of a Workers' Party? Hello? Is anyone home? By the way, the link for that quote is to Longerich p. 15. 

Himmler was in a fencing fraternity in college and its leader and many members were Jewish. Although we are told he was already anti-Semitic, this didn't seem to bother him. Strange. We are told Himmler tried to pursue a military career in college, but was not successful. With the Prince and his mother as personal friends, how believable is that? He joined N.S.D.A.P at age 22.

That's taken straight from Himmler's Wiki page. It is supposed to be a young Himmler in early SS uniform. But it is an obvious fake. Compare the blacks in his shadows to the blacks in the background: not even close. The least shadow analysis destroys this photo in about 3 seconds. And is he supposed to have a beard there, or what is going on? I wasn't aware the German army allowed beards. Regardless, his lapels tell us he is already a Brigadier General. Doesn't look like a Brigadier General to me, since he is out of his coat. Do military men actually buy this, or are they ordered to play along all over the world? 

Most of the photos of Himmler are poorly faked. Here's a few:

 

Just awful. On the first, notice the line where his neck meets his collar. It's an obvious paste-up. On the second, notice how wide his neck is, and compare it to other pictures of him. He never had a neck that wide. He was not an athlete, he was a gay actor. Also note the lapel insignia's, which look added to both photos. Study them on all posted photos of Himmler: they always look fake. 

These two, posted together, make the fake very obvious. In the first, his neck is rather short. In the second, his neck is extremely long. He has gained about three inches of collar clearance. That's a really bad paste job. I recommend you use that clue to study all the photos of Himmler online. In the set, his neck goes from short to very long and from wide to narrow, despite no great weight gains or losses

That's another paste job. Two things to look at first: one, the hat-brim shadows don't match. His friend's brim is casting a dark and sharp shadow about an inch wide, while his is casting a dim shadow about half as wide. Two, the face edges don't match. Himmler's face is fairly sharp where it meets the background, while his friend's is blurrier. And notice how his friend's chin isn't casting any sensible shadow down onto his collar. Finally, notice how Russian-Jewish he looked when young and thin. 

That's another ridiculous fake. Why are their uniforms three different shades of dark? Did the Brig. General to your right [Kaltenbrunner] wash his uniform in too much Clorox, or does the sun only shine on him? And the positions of the lapel pins doesn't match, either. Kaltenbrunner has his pinned to the right, while Himmler is pinned to the left. I see three different pocket pins, too. The Nazi theater department seems a bit sloppy. Someone seems to have recognized this problem, because we also find this:

 

You see what they did there? They had someone photoshop it, cropping it and equalizing the contrast, so that their uniforms match. Unfortunately, doing that led to a further problem. Look at the background. It is now very obvious the background is fake. 

Himmler was involved in the Beer Hall Putsch hoax, which I have already deconstructed. It makes no sense on any level, as you can see there. 

Honestly, after that, the rest of his bio isn't even worth reading or analyzing. It is fiction from the first word. It is more useful to return to his genealogy. So let's return to Himmler's father for a moment. His full name is given as Johann Konrad Clemens Matthaus Himmler. Reminds us of Samuel Clemens, doesn't it? So where did Himmler get that name? We aren't told. The lines end soon after that at Geni, and we get no other clues. But this might tell us why Mark Twain was in Heidelberg and Europe so much before the first World War, supposedly working as a reporter.

We also find some interesting information here, where Himmler's great-niece is interviewed in 2007 by a Buckinghamshire newspaper The Northern Echo. There, it is admitted that she is “the wife of an Israeli Jew”. Pretty curious by itself. We are supposed to believe this family turned 180 degrees in one generation? Unlikely. At the end of the article, we find this Katrin Himmler has written a book The Himmler Brothers, published by Fischer in Germany and Macmillan in the UK. We can be sure it is misdirection. Why? To start with, she won't name her husband. She implies this is for his protection or something, but that is ridiculous. I assume she is hiding his name because it would blow the whole the story.  

[Addendum January 28, 2017: a reader from Germany sent me a link today that is gold, in support of the above paragraph. It is a 2008 article  from The Guardian in London. It is the curious tale of how the sons and daughters of top Nazis converted to Judaism and moved to Israel. No, “curious” is a vast understatement. I encourage you to read it closely, because—unspun—it acts as clear proof of everything I have told you above. The first interview is with Rabbi Aharon Shear-Yashuv, whose father was a Nazi in the Waffen SS. I reread the article several times to see if he had changed his name, but nothing is there in answer to that. So it begs the question: what was his German name? Did he even have one? It is a very important part of this story denied us. All the other names of those interviewed are also denied us, which is convenient for the story. With the rest, we don't even get Israeli names. Nothing. So we can't do a search on them to confirm their stories. But just ask yourself this: do we have any indication this whole story isn't spun away from the far more likely truth, that being that these people—though real children of Nazis—were always Jewish? And that their parents were, too? That would explain this “phenomenon” immediately, wouldn't it, without the need to interview psychologists and make up a whole new clinical category for it. Have you ever heard of Occam's Razor? It is the default position that most things should be explained in the simplest way possible. Given two theories, always go with the simplest one unless you have a very strong reason not to. The odds will always be heavily in your favor.

Given that, I think you can see how bold the storytellers are. I think we could call it reckless, were it not for the fact that it seems to work brilliantly. These writers for The Guardian put the truth right in front of your face, and then spin you off it. The liars have become so confident from past successes, they know they can wave the truth in front of your face, then remove it and continue the lie. You will go on as before, burying the truth for them because it doesn't suit the larger story they have trapped you in.

And they don't just tell you what they have done in the past; they tell what the future will be, too. The Rabbi tells us Germany is being wiped off the map by its low birthrate, and he exults in it. But that reminds us that to be wiped off the map in such a situation, the country in question has to allow unchecked immigration. I guess you are aware what is going on in Germany and other parts of Europe right now, and less so in the US. The borders have been opened, expressly to allow this influx. The European people can't understand why their leaders are allowing it, but the Rabbi just told them why. In previous papers, we have seen the top Jewish families warring with the Holy Roman Empire for centuries. In the 20th century, they won the last stages of that war. In the 21st century, we are seeing the mop-up. 

Some still won't understand what these Jews have against Germany, or why I said this is happening “less so” in the US. It is because these families have no grudge against the US. As we have seen, they have owned us from the beginning. Israel isn't the primary Zion: the US is. Israel is just an outpost. In these new articles, they tell us Jews hate Germans for recent crimes, but we know that isn't true. They have been warring against Germany for centuries, so the grudge is very old. This war has been going on for a thousand years or more. The Rabbi and the writers for the Guardian obviously consider the war won. We are thoroughly subjugated, and can now just be toyed with. 

That is what is happening when the author says again and again, “something seems to be missing from this story”. He is mirroring back to you your own unease and disbelief, which he knows you will be feeling. But he is so sure he can control it, he can tell what he is doing while he does it. He even says this: 

They talk about despising the Trinity and the terrible things that the Germans did to the Jews, but it seems like they are talking a genocide that doesn't exist, even in their memories. 

All I can say is, WOW. It takes some balls to put that in this article. The new writers don't just put the truth in front of your face, they put it halfway down your throat, almost to your stomach, before they pull it back out.

But I can prove this story in The Guardian is false. I can do that because I can do math. The last interview is with a guy claiming his step-grandfather was Hans Hitler, son of Alois Jr. He says in the interview that when his mother came home after the Allied victory, she was denounced as a Nazi and her flat was seized. That would have been 1945, right? If she had a flat, that indicates she was not a child. So we can assume she was born sometime before 1925. Her grandfather was Alois Jr., born in 1882. We know from his bio above that he returned to Austria from Liverpool in 1914, at which time he took a second wife. If we assume that is where this Hans came from, then Hans couldn't have been born before 1914. If we search on Hans Hitler, we find nothing. But there is a Heinz Hitler, born 1920. He can't be the father of this woman, unless he had her when he was about five years old. Even if we go back to 1914 and insert another son Hans in here, it still doesn't work because that only makes Hans eleven years old. We would have to go back before Alois went to England and married the Dowling woman. Unfortunately, there are no records of a child, legitimate or not, in that period. If the Guardian wishes to rewrite history, it should present some evidence beyond the word of this unnamed man in Israel. 

One more thing I found in this research. In a related article from 2013  at the Jewish magazine Aish.com, we get an update, learning that Hans Hitler's wife was allegedly Erna Patra Hitler. We also learn she changed her name after the war to Hiler. Sort of corroborates my guess above, doesn't it? But it gets even better: in an article from the same year in Die Zeit on the same guy, it says that Erna actually changed her name to Hiller.] 

[Addendum February 16, 2017: more confirmation of the above analysis has been sent in by my guest writer Josh from Israel. He has discovered that the Israeli man above claiming to be a step relation of Hitler is Michael Mach of Tel Aviv University. Problem is, Josh also found this page at Wikitree, indicating Hans Hitler was really Johannes Theodor (Hans) Hitler, b. 1906. “Hans” was just a nickname, so why didn't they give us the real name to start with? Well, it could be because this Hans Hitler is not the son of Alois at all. He is listed as the son of Johann and Maria. And who are they? Is Johann supposed to be another brother of Adolf Hitler? If so, he is not listed in the current tree at Wikipedia. Of course, neither is Hans or Johannes. The only Johann listed is the grandfather of Adolf, and that Johann also married a Maria. So it looks like we are being led on another wild goose chase through make-believe relatives and recycled names. We also have make-believe photos:

 

Josh found that at Pinterest. It is tagged as Hans and Erna with Alois and Hedwig. But although I confirm the third person matches the picture given as Alois, Jr. above (just older), I confirm nothing else. The picture is an obvious paste-up, with inside-jokes included. Notice the first two people are mysteriously larger than the second two, although they are standing next to each other. And I don't mean that they are taller or fatter. I mean they are not properly scaled. We have a perspective problem here, since the first two seem (at first glance) to be forward of the second two. Because closer, they would be a few percentage points larger overall. But if you look again, you see that Erna is supposed to be joining the two men in a line. So there should be no perspective involved. Hans is simply too big for the photo, and so is Erna's head. Which leads you to study Hans' edges. Look where his coat meets the background. It's an obvious paste. And realizing that takes us back to Erna's big head. To start with, notice how her shadows are darker than everyone else's. Everyone is shadowed to your left, but Erna has a dark line down her left side. Why? Because that head was pasted in. And once you realize that, you can look even more closely. You may think that is just a really homely woman, but it isn't. It is a man. That is what I meant by “jokes included”. 

Don't believe me? Maybe this will help:

“Her” head obviously has more contrast than his head. Otherwise, his left edge would match the darkness of hers. And blown up, it is even easier to tell that is a man. That is huge head with a massive jaw. That is way beyond homely. Study the way the head goes into the neck, on the right side. Stare at it for a bit and you can start to see how the head was pasted in there. That's probably why we get it blurry. Without the blur, it would be even easier to tell it was a paste-up. 

Although Josh included that photo in his email, I searched on it myself, to see if I could find a better version. I couldn't, but I did find this:

That is supposed to be Hitler at the Schonmann wedding in 1937. Can you believe they still publish that? It's an obvious paste-up. Hitler is just floating in there as if some grade schooler pasted him in with Elmer's glue-all, and he isn't even the worst. Look at the older blonde-haired lady, fifth from your left. Now, look for her shadow. She isn't casting one, is she? The flash in this photo was positioned slightly to the left, since the shadows we can see are on the right. Everyone who was really there should be casting a shadow in the same direction. But although the guy behind is in bright white where her shadow should be, there isn't one. That means either he was pasted in or she was. My guess is he was, and he is covering what was her shadow. He is tagged as Dr. Morell, which must be Theodore Morell, Hitler's physician. They pasted him to confirm Hitler's presence, I guess. 

Need more? Can't see that Hitler is pasted in? OK, try this. The flash is from the front-left, as we have established. So why does Hitler have a dark line down the left side of his face? Note especially the dark spot where his chin on the left meets his collar. No one else has that, do they? Not even the guy right behind him. Still not enough? How about the outline of his coat to your left. Study the line from collar to shoulder, and down the sleeve. Too perfect, isn't it? The shoulder is way too sharp, and the line of the sleeve was cut with one long snip of the scissors. Still not enough? How old is Hitler there? This is August 1937, so he should be 48. Does he look 48? No, he looks about 35. Which leads us to look again at Dr. Morell. Morell was only three years older than Hitler, so he should be 51 there. Does he look three years older than Hitler in that photo? Again, no. Morell looks about 50, but he looks about 15 years older than Hitler, or more. Still not enough? Was Hitler that skinny at age 48? Not according to other fake photographic evidence. The man they have pasted in there is very svelte, with a small waist and small torso. He is also small overall. Although he is the tallest man in the photo, he is barely taller than the women around him. Those who paste up these photos don't seem to realize that men are bigger than women, not only in height but in head size. We saw the same problem in faked photos of the Kennedy family, where Joe, Jr. was always pasted in too small. These photos were faked to fool people who have never studied photos, or closely studied human anatomy. 

Still not enough? Well, let me take the photo into photoshop, just changing the saturation levels a bit. All I have done is change the contrast and saturation of the entire photo. I have not done anything to Hitler separately.[see this photoshop picture by Miles at page 43 of the PDF below DC]

See how flat he looks? The blacks in his tux have no variation. He looks like a cardboard cut-out, doesn't he? That's because he is. Also notice how some people are turning purple and some aren't. This is another indication of who was there and who wasn't. 

Here's another horrible paste-up from the same page at Fold3.com.

Terrible resolution, but an obvious fake at any resolution. Just study the women to his left and right. While the face of one is high contrast, the face of the other is low contrast. The one to your right is probably wearing white like the one on the left, but her contrast has been lowered while the other one has been raised. If you cut them out of that photo, took them into photoshop separately, and matched the contrast levels, the dresses would be the same color white. But here, it looks like the one on the right is wearing light grey or lilac or something. Why? Because this is supposed to be a wedding photo. It is supposed to be Gretl's wedding in 1944. So the lady on the left can't be wearing white as well, right? You don't compete with the bride on her wedding day. This proves the photo is fake without even looking at Hitler.] 

[Addendum March 18, 2017: My guest writer Kevin just reminded me that in his research on the Folgers, he found one of Peter's ancestors to be a Hillar/Hiller. Peter's great-grandfather Samuel Folger married a Nancy Hillar/Hiller. It was a common name in the Nantucket area at that time, and appears to be Jewish. We find several people named Levi Hiller, Moses Hiller, Hannah Hiller, Rachel Hiller, Isaac Hiller, etc. at that time and place. That page is also useful, since we find many Hillers in Holzgerlingen, Neckarkreis, Wurttemburg. This is interesting because Holzgerlinger is about 30 miles from Unterowisheim, Baden, that we looked at above with Himmler/Henninger. 

Another reader wrote in to point me to Hitler's signature:

Strange that in almost all sigs after about 1925, Hitler takes the time to cross his f and double cross his H, but fails to cross his t—leaving us with the name Hiller.] 

Then we come to the name of Himmler's grandmother: Hofrichter. We already did the name Richter above. Same song, second verse. They may have just fudged it in the genealogy. This indicates Himmler was closely related to Hess. What about the name Heyder? It is a variation of the name Haider, which we saw above in the genealogy of Hitler. So are they admitting Hitler was related to Himmler, or just toying with us again? I assume both. Either way, Heyder is another Jewish name, so they are incredibly bold. They think nothing of your intelligence. 

For more evidence of that, you may visit the page of Jorg Haider, governor of Carinthia until 2008. We are told his father Robert joined NSDAP in 1929 as a 15-year-old boy. Right. Although Robert was an officer at the end of the war, he got off with no trial. Plus, according to his bio he had already been a lieutenant by 1938. Although he fought throughout the war and was wounded several times, we are told he was never promoted, still being a lieutenant in 1945. Not believable. More likely he was decorated many times and ended the war as at least a lt. colonel. Jorg married a Hoffmann and his sister married a Haubner. Although we are told there are strict laws against anything to do with Nazism in both Germany and Austria, for some reason we are supposed to believe this Jorg Haider made a long career out of being a poorly cloaked Nazi in Austria. How could he do that? Because it is all a con: Nazism is nothing but theater, and these people like Haider are simply crypto-Jews, directly related to the same families that have been pulling this con for a century. As in the US, they create two fake parties that appear to be opposed but that are really allied fascists. They then divert your attention from any real events with a constant stream of fiction. 

In fact, I have already proved my point in this paper and don't feel obligated to say much more about Himmler. If you can read everything above and not gag on all of 20th c. history, you need to go dunk your head in some ice water. I am going to save more photo analysis of Hitler for another time, since my eyes need some rest. But on the way out I will hit a couple of minor things. The deaths of all the top Nazis have always been known to be suspicious, but I haven't looked at any of the others above. Let's take a quick look at the story of Himmler's demise. After the war he was captured. He was moved to different camps and then finally searched two days later while in medical custody. We are told he had a cyanide capsule hidden in his mouth, which he then swallowed. He was buried in an unmarked grave of now unknown location. OK. None of that makes any sense. Outside the magical world of bad fiction, things don't work that way. Himmler would have been searched immediately and asked who he was immediately. Not two days later. If he had a suicide plan as escape, he would have had to put it into action immediately upon capture, before any search, to be absolutely sure his capsule wasn't found and taken away. Beyond that, this story of an unmarked grave is absurd. We are told they knew who he was, so why would he be buried in an unmarked grave? They have used this lame story over and over throughout history to cover these faked deaths, and for some reason no one ever questions it. The bad guys are always buried in unmarked graves in a ditch outside the castle or in the armory or beside the gallows or thrown into a river. This is very convenient for the storytellers, since all evidence has been destroyed. You can't do a DNA test on Himmler's body now, can you? In the real world, it wouldn't be done that way. This is a very bad guy, one of the top enemies, so you would want to be sure people believed your story and knew where to find his remains. You would wish to build a little evil monument, warning people in the future not to be like this bad guy. You would want there to be no doubt of his existence, capture, and death, so you would do everything possible to verify it, catalog it, and memorialize it. Instead, we are supposed to believe just the opposite: the top enemies were treated as if they didn't matter at all, buried like mongrel dogs and forgotten. 

As a parting bonus, I will tell how to read one last mystery. It has never been explained where the word Nazi came from. Wikipedia tells you to this day it comes from the German pronunciation of the word “national”. Right. And you believe that? Given what we learned above, maybe now you can see the truth: Nazi is simply a shortening of the word Ashkenazi. 

*Hubbard is descended from DeWolfs, originally Wolfes. Also Potters, Morrises, Putnams, Reeds, Drapers, Pecks, Taylors, Middletons, and Holloways. The Holloways were cloth merchants in Boston. The Drapers were cloth merchants in London, as the name suggests. The Pecks founded New Haven. If we go back far enough, we find William Gascoigne, Lord Chief Justice. That line ends at the Duke de Gascoigne, in the year 965. Another line ends in the Barons Vavasour in 995. They were related to the Perrys, who go back to the same period. They were also related to the Mowbrays, who we have seen before in my paper on Daisy Ridley. Also the Darcys and Fitzgeralds. The Darcys go back to 1031 in Lincolnshire. In France they go back even farther, as the Counts of Arcis. 

**It didn't occur to me until later, but Pinon may be linked to Peron and Pinheiros, as a slurred respelling. 

http://mileswmathis.com/hiller.pdf