Man or Human Self-Test
By Anna Von Reitz
Many have been asking, okay, well.... I can accept based on my observation and experience that
there are at least two different kinds of humanoid beings here on Earth, but which one am I?
Mankind comes from the Ancient Builder Race. As the name suggests, they built the Earth and it is
their nature to build and nurture. To the extent that they destroy things, they destroy to make space,
to remodel, to improve, to build something new. It is never destruction for the sake of destruction.
Humans destroy simply because they enjoy the release of energy and sense of power it gives them.
There is no particular rhyme or reason, and no specific intention to do anything beyond destroying
something.
Mankind enjoys "the journey" of life and the whole process of "getting there" with various activities,
because they understand the necessary steps and the "un-foldment" of creative processes. Thus,
each step in a long process is fulfilling, quite apart from the ultimate result. This gives them the
patience to nurture others and the world around them.
Mankind are good gardeners, for example, because they enjoy the process of preparing the ground,
selecting the seeds, planting, weeding, watering and whatever else needs to be done to bring forth
the harvest.
Humans are "instant gratification" junkies. They want the harvest results, but have no patience and
take no satisfaction in all the steps it takes to get the harvest. It's all wham, bam, thank you, Ma'am.
They don't know how to nurture themselves, much less anyone or anything else, with the result that
they always feel needy and cheated and are prone to blame others for this ----not knowing how to
give what they need to themselves.
Mankind takes delight in the Natural World and is easily thrilled by the thunder of the surf, soothed
by the sound of falling rain, entranced by the smell of a pine forest, touched by the beauty of a single
flower. They are aware of the beauty of all the colors and textures of the Earth and Heavens --- able
to drink in and appreciate the blooming tapestry of the forest floor in spring time and the palette of
the sky. Even without any intention to do so, they notice everything about the Natural World ---
dandelions growing in the cracks of a sidewalk, the sound of a dog barking.
Humans are relatively insensitive to any of this and are more attuned to geometric relationships
--lines and shapes instead of textures--- and tones rather than colors. They have an ability to close
themselves off from the Natural World and live in relatively colorless stone and cement and metal
environments.
Mankind feels a distinct loss when cut off from the Natural World and will often bring the Natural
World with them in the form of aquariums and table top gardens, window boxes, potted plants, etc.
Humans use fake potted plants as "harmonious design elements" --- again emphasizing their
sensitivity to visual patterns and form, but not any deep connectivity to life and the nurturing of life.
Mankind is poetic and their use of language is poetic. They are sensitive to rhyme and meter, sound
and balance of language, quality of sound, and frequency of sound. Humans notice different things
about sound and language -- they see language as a means to achieve ends and exert power, but
don't show any natural poetic proclivity or appreciation.
Mankind is naturally unassuming and straight-forward, seeing no need or value in falsehoods, ego, or
deceit. Mankind is self-accepting. Their viewpoint is turned outward most of the time, with their
inward-turning devoted to self-discovery and spiritual contemplation.
Humans by contrast are obsessed with lies, deceits, secrets, and issues of power and pride. Most
humans do not accept their nature, which leads them to feel alienated from themselves as well as
the rest of Nature. Their viewpoint is turned inward most of the time, to serve their sense of isolation
and separateness. Their inward-turning moments are not for the purposes of self-discovery or for any
deep spiritual contemplation, but rather to calculate the odds of outcomes and the best means to
achieve their ends.
Mankind is inclined to nurture and to share everything. Humans are inclined to mindlessly hoard
whatever they have, even if it is junk. Nurturing, even nurturing their own children, is foreign to
them, and they often look at their children in terms of something to satisfy their own needs --- which
can range from sexual needs, to need to feel power over someone else (bullying), to needs to excuse
themselves for bad behavior (blaming), to needs to find-fault (shaming).
Mankind accepts differences of skin color, temperament, religion, ethnicity, language, culture, and
other factors as part of nature of things --- and not any aberration or breaking of any rigid pattern of
sameness. It delights Mankind that there are hundreds if not thousands of different kinds of grass,
trees, flowers, fish, insects, gemstones and other manifestations of Creation, so they readily accept
all the different colors and kinds and variations among people, too, without assigning any particular
"value" to one over another.
Humans have rigid pecking orders in line with their predilection and affinity for patterns. Everything
and everyone has to fit in a rigid pattern and if you don't fit their pattern, you are "bad" or "suspect"
or "uncivil" or "sub-human". They encourage herd behavior to reap the benefits of manipulating it
and use labeling and name-calling as a means to establish their pecking orders. As such, "political
correctness" is a human manifestation foreign to Mankind.
Mankind feels natural compassion for suffering and disease of any kind. This is because they have
empathy --- an extra sense that allows them to substitute themselves into the other person's
situation, know how they would feel, and that then prompts them to help and assist others and even
other species.
Humans do not, generally speaking, have this ability to "bi-locate" their sensory perception or "walk
a mile" in anyone else's shoes. This is critical in that it undermines their ability to feel sympathy and
also their ability to "step outside themselves" to observe their own behavior. They are limited to a
focus on themselves and their own benefit and condition in the same way as a single-focus lens is
limited to one depth of field, compared to a zoom lens which can move from one depth of field to
another with ease.
This limitation -- some would say a "hobbling of their hearts" -- also leads to Humans having little
natural sense of conscience. Mankind feels what is right and what is wrong instinctively and has a
natural sense of justice, but Humans learn these things by rote, by rules that are externally imposed,
and can only be held to moral behavior by a continuing application of rewards and punishments and
definitions.
You could sell a Human the proposition that it is okay to eat dog dung, or murder people with red
hair-- but it is impossible to similarly influence Mankind.
Humans are comfortable letting someone else do their thinking for them, and if anything is too
complex, they will actively seek commentators to tell them how to interpret things. They will also
actively seek group opinion --- the larger the group the better --- because they lack the critical
thinking skills to form and justify their own opinions for themselves.
Humans are the original "group think" sources, the ones who make un-examined generalities, like
"everybody does it" and "everyone knows that" and "everyone wants a Lexus".
Mankind insists on thinking for themselves and making their own evaluations and does not regard
the opinions of others as any determining factor.
In the same way, any wildly immoral behavior can be introduced into a Human population and they
will have no internal moral compass to prevent them from adopting practices that Mankind would
immediately recognize as insane.
This makes Humans very malleable and open to suggestion compared to Mankind, which is desirable
from the standpoint of those who created Humans to function as slave laborers.
Finally, Mankind is possessed of more graceful and fluid and yet, also substantially weaker body
forms than Humans. Mankind has less muscle mass, less bone density, smaller teeth, less sheer
energy, less hormonal activity, and lives longer on average than Humans. You might call Mankind
"late bloomers" as they mature more slowly in all respects and have slower metabolic systems
overall.
Humans tend to physically mature early, to have abundant, thick hair, and proportionally, big feet,
big sexual organs, and big hands. These are all consequences of genetic engineering to create
laborers that reproduce fast, are built to do physical work, and survive in difficult climates and
conditions.
Mankind is most comfortable and happy living in relatively small communities close to Nature.
Humans are more comfortable and happy living in cities and are not greatly bothered by population
density.
Are you a Man or a Human? If you have read this, you probably already know.
If you are Human, it won't immediately bother you to know the truth.
The loss is something you won't truly comprehend, because you have never known any other way of
being, and if the rulers of this world have their way, you never will know any different or better
condition.
If you are one of Mankind, you are probably feeling a combination of relief and alarm--- relief because
you finally know that you are different and why you are different, and alarm because you now realize
for sure that you are living in a world heavily populated by comparatively crippled slave laborers.
Crippled mentally and crippled emotionally, Humans are victims of a Master Plan promoted by
adherents of Eugenics and Master Race ideas--- ideas that are as harmful as poison and easily
connected to their modern source --- Nazism and False Aryan narratives.
The truth is that Humans and Mankind both occur in all kinds of colors and variations.
There is no "Master Race", there are only beings aligned with Ego and those aligned with our Creator,
those who have been mentally and emotionally castrated to serve foul masters--like Tolkien's Orcs,
and those who have to put an end to the mad dreams of David Rockefeller, Prince Philip, and others
who have purposefully created these horrors.
The Holy Roman Empire is now rising as the Fourth Reich. As Voltaire observed, it isn't holy, it isn't
Roman, and it isn't an Empire. It is a crime syndicate formed around a base of false ideas and evil
sentiments, implemented via institutionalized and carefully compartmentalized crimes against
"humanity".
And what is "humanity"? Both Mankind and Humans are included in the moniker, "humanity",
because Humans came from Man. They were developed using our DNA and our energetic templates.
Swindle School 101
By Anna Von Reitz
When I was young we had a rash of land ownership scams based on abuse of Quit Claim Deeds. The
fraud artist would offer to sell you this beautiful piece of land and deed it over to you via a Quit Claim
Deed.
The problem was that the purported Seller never had any valid ownership in that land to begin with,
so his Quit Claim was meaningless.
For only $50,000 I will gladly give you a Quit Claim to all the land I own in Florida.
The Municipal United States Congress has been doing the same thing.
They don't actually represent you, but they let people assume that they do, and then they act as if
they had the authority to do all the things they have done--- when in point of fact, they don't.
They have no valid interest--- no land in Florida. So all their works and ways are invalid from the start
and as if they never existed since 1860 with respect to us. The technical legal term is: void for
fraud.
We have our republics, if we occupy them. We can, if we get moving and organized, "reconstruct"
our Federal States of States and impose sanity on this asylum.
The complete fraudulent nature of this entire situation is made clear from the fact that the
perpetrators endlessly describe their aberrant, renegade government of, by, and for corporations as
a "democracy" -- and they have never yet had a mandate of 51% of anyone voting for anything.
They proclaim that they are a democracy, albeit one without any mandate to exist.
That's like claiming to be a milk cow without an udder, or a cat without claws, a bird without feathers,
or a snake without scales. You might as well claim that your wife is a hat, as to claim to be a
democracy without a mandate.
You need look no farther for any explanation or fact. The entire house of cards falls apart on the first
defect, and there you have two (2) defects that are completely unanswerable: (1) their United States
Congress does not represent our United States; (2) their democracy can't exist without a mandate,
and so far as we can determine, they have never had a mandate to do anything at all.
Bottom line, the whole circumstance is nothing but a criminal Breach of Trust and Swindle owed
immediate correction and cessation.
800,000 "Non-Essential" Employees?
By Anna Von Reitz
If they are "non-essential" why are we paying for their services?
Just sayin'.
If we don't need them....what are they doing on our payroll?
Also bear in mind that we have the better part of a million "non-essential" employees on our payroll
at the same time that those responsible for this situation are poor-mouthing about their "National
Debt"?
Well, if they have an insurmountable National Debt and 800,000 employees we don't really need, the
answer to the problem seems obvious enough to me as an Employer.
First, make the Pink Slips permanent.
Second, deport the two million or so Bar Attorneys, confiscate their ill-gotten assets, give their homes
and retirement accounts to the 800,000 unemployed federal workers, use the rest of the gross
largess to pay down the "National Debt" and everyone (except the Bar Attorneys) will go home
happy.
Very happy.
Talking about humanitarian crisis and borders and forced immigration --- what will the Lord Mayor
and the Queen do with two million or so unemployed British Merchant Marine Shipping Clerks when
they all come home to roost?
You think Europe has trouble with Muslims? And we have trouble with Mexicans and Hondurans? Just
think about two million angry disinherited lawyers hitting the streets and unemployment lines in
London?
Makes me smile.
Tune in tomorrow for "As the World Turns (and I Vomit)".
No comments:
Post a Comment